Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011_1014_Agenda_Meeting Packet Paul Weil Members: Chair Kurt Akamine Kathy Clark Mark Hubbard Brad Nagano Vice-Chair Warren Perry Secretary COUNTY OF KAUAI BOARD OF ETHICS NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA Friday, October 14, 2011 9:00 a.m. or shortly thereafter Mo'ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room 3 4444 Rice Street, L-ihu'e, HI 96766 CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Open Session Minutes of September 9, 2011 COMMUNICATION BOE 2011-19 Memorandum dated September 14, 2011 from the Board of Ethics to the Charter Review Commission providing input and comments regarding specific areas of concern or issues related to Article XX, Code of Ethics REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION RAO 11-005 Letter dated 9/27/11 from Councilmember Mel Rapozo requesting an opinion from the Board of Ethics as to whether conflicts of interest exist with the role of the Boards & Commissions Administrator and the Kaua'i County Charter duties and responsibilities of the Salary Commission. a. Communication dated 10/3/11 from Roy Morita testifying as an individual regarding the role of the Boards & Commissions Administrator and those duties and responsibilities to all boards and commissions. RAO 11-006 E-mail dated 10/4/11 from Bruce Pleas, Chairman of the Kekaha Host Community Benefit Action Committee(KHCBCAC) requesting a decision(Advisory Opinion) on whether KHCBCAC members are required to submit a financial Disclosure Statement to the Board of Ethics, a. E-mail dated 10/4"'ll from Jose Bulatao, Vice-chair of KHCBCAC offering testimony as to why KHCBCAC members are not required to submit a financial Disclosure Statement to the Board of Ethics and requesting an opinion. An Equal Opportunity Employer BUSINESS BOE 2011-20 Consideration of changing the November meeting date to Thursday, November 10, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. to accommodate the November holiday schedule. DISCLOSURES for review and examination by the Board of Ethics a. Nathaniel Childs (Public Access"'Open Space Commission) b. Arryl Kaneshiro (Cost Control Commission) c. Lance Kobashi-awa(Deputy Prosecuting Attorney) d. John Isobe (Boards & Commissions) EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes § 92-4 and 92-5 (a) (4), 92-9 (a)(1-4) (b), the purpose of this executive session is to receive and approve Executive Session minutes and to consult with the Commission's legal counsel on issues pertaining to the Commission's and the County's powers, duties, privileges, immunities, and/or liabilities as they may relate to this item, deliberate and take such action as appropriate. ES-7: Executive Session Minutes of September 9, 2011 RETURN TO OPEN SESSION Ratify Board of Ethics actions taken in Executive Session for items: ES 7: Executive Session Minutes of September 9, 2011 ANNOUNCEMENTS Next Meeting: Friday, November 18, 2011 —9:00 a.m., Mo'ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room 3 ADJOURNMENT NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes §92-7 (a), the Commission may, when deemed necessary, hold an executive session on any agenda item without written public notice if the executive session was not anticipated in advance. Any such executive session shall be held pursuant to HRS §92-4 and shall be limited to those items described in HRS §92-5(a). c: Mona Clark, Deputy County Attorney PUBLIC COMMENTS and TESTIMONY Persons wishing to offer comments are encouraged to submit written testimony at least 24-hours prior to the meeting indicating: 1. Your name and if applicable, your positiow I title and organization you are representing; 2. The agenda item that you are providing comments on-, and 3. Whether you will be testifying in person or submitting written comments only. 21112 Board of Ethics—October 14, 2011 4. If you are unable to submit your testimony at least 24 hours prior to the meeting, please provide 10 copies of your written testimony at the meeting clearly indicating the name of the testifier; and While every effort will be made to copy, organize and collate all testimony received, materials received on the day of the meeting or improperly identified may be distributed to the members after the meeting is concluded. The length of time allocated to persons wishing to present verbal testimony may be limited at the discretion of the chairperson or presiding member. Send written testimony to: Board of Ethics Attn: Barbara Davis Office of Boards & Commissions 4444 Rice Street, Suite 150 LThu'e, HI 96766 Email: bdavis Cd,,kauai.gov Fax: 241-5127 Phone: 241-4919 SPECIAL ASSISTANCE If you need an alternate format or an auxiliary aid to participate, please contact the Boards & Commissions Support Clerk at 241-4919 at least five(5) working days prior to the meeting. 3 P Board of Ethics—October 14, 2011 ci 4.1 un, cr "D ct cl, L J 7�1 '51 5 kr, ct 6-5 ct ct Ln 77 ct o 44 Ct tb cl CL ------------------------------------—------- 74 Minutes FT B Lrl 72 t.2 zz C-1 -z7 Ln '75 cr Ln 4- 170- C� C.2 C-1 tr 1 L4 cl 1L) In cr ci ct 4. C3 C) ej 'jz: IJ t4 Cn nt cr cn U. � Cl =. I U tfj I cl va 7:1 cn u �s La 45 cr, 72 ct !:41 ct u CJ rv� 0 ti CA ttr cl ta J 4-5 7� Cl J, Cj C's � > 'I) 0 c > 7:� -3 5 ct > clo cr, ct t4 7� 73 r4 5 54 0 ct C.1 tf) VI vi ct cu - C-1 ct g'- -r a3 al c3 t) sn. Ln ct '42 �j CA Ct = to- Lr, >e ct -4 t4; ct cn �: to Ln Cj C4 C!3 C6 cr 44 2 f4. 75) cn � cri LZ ct 2 lz� > t4ol 73 0 CS 0 4", 4.1 a) 't — 0 *�., E 'i Z c3 s 0 C-3 to C) 7= v-5 ZI t4– cr C.- 4- 75 > 0 C) cn u ct C!3 ct CZ ZA cl cl CA J2, —E - 4-1 IP cr cn -:s 'S 63, al ij ct It cn ci ct 75 V� rA 72 44 Ct Ln cn cn �> cn Ij cr Ln ;Z Ln t;n ct 4z C7 0 C It tb 73 -p u x eil t) W 't tA TO tA Z EE .�2 CI Ei ZA 0 loll F1 J- 14 Cl 0 cr co al C� CA �r r T4 C) cr 0 ;5 ,I tt, Con p w j s Z3 CZ tb 8b C-1 C-4 {u 0 0 I-D F3 4.1 0 Ic; It* a3 7� C) � 7 \ cl L. cl I ei) ct cn Paul Weil Members: Chair Kurt Akamine Kathy Clark Mark Hubbard ti 9r r 4� Brad Nagano Vice-Chair 0 Warren Perry Secretary COUNTY OF KAUA'I BOARD OF ETHICS TO: Chair Sherman Shiraishi and Members of the Charter Review Commission cc: Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr., Mayor Gary Heu, Managing Director FROM: Paul Weil, Chairperson Via: John Isobe, Boards and Commissions Administrat r DATE: September 14, 2011 RE: Comments Related to Article XX, Code of Ethics The Board of Ethics, at its meeting on September 9, 2011, considered the Charter Review Commission's request for comments and/or recommendations regarding specific areas of concern or issues related to the existing language in the Code of Ethics that the Ethics Board may have encountered during it deliberations. In response to the above, the Board of Ethics recommends that the Charter Review Commission consider the following: Section 20.03 A—provide clarifying language or a definition for the term"competitive bidding". Section 20.04 D—place the existing language into a new Section to clarify that the Council's authority to adopt supplementary provisions is not only limited to the"Disclosures"provisions of the Ethics Code. The members also discussed the need to clarify Section 20.05 C, by specifying that, "...the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members to which the board is entitled shall be necessary to take any action." This proposed revision is consistent with the provisions of Charter Section 23.02 J and HRS § 92-15. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. An Equal Qpportunity Emplqver BOE 2011-19 COUNTY COUNCIL OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK JAY FUBFA0u, CHAIR Council Services Division |0ANINa. YU8OMURA. VICE CBaIR Elections Division TlMurNUK& PETER A. NAKa0DRA, County Clerk 0[CK/F[BaNG EnUARD0T0PEN/8. JQ.. Deputy County Clerk K/PUKAIKUAL|'l OF NADINE K. NAKaNIVnA Telephone: (80m)24|-f/88 mELR»POzU 4396 RICE STREET, SUITE 2o9 Fac'/mde: (808)-141-6349 LJ8n'E. K-AUa1BavvmY'/ 96766 c'md|: comzouuoil(lkuvuinov September 27, 2011 S& 2 12011 The Honorable Paul Well, Chair 8c Members uf the County ofl{auu'i Board ofEthics c/o Office o{Boards J» Commissions 4144 Rice Street, Suite lGO Ulho'e. 8l 967G6 Dear Chair Weil and members uf the County ofI[uoa'i Board nfEthics: SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR BOARD OF ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION DnriogtbaKauaiCouoty (3ouocil'a (`^C000cd`m'`) de{iberatioms/ ouLheCouutyof I{uuu'i Salary Commission's ("Salary (]unozoieoioo`a'') Resolution No. 2011-1. questions have been raised in testimony about whether conflicts of interest exist with the role of the 8nmrde &c Commissions Administrator (''z\dooioiotrutoc'') and the Kaoa'i County Charter ("Charter") duties and responsibilities of the Salary Commission. lu the case ofSalacv Commission Resolution No. 2OII-I ('Beao|odaoNo. 201 1-l"), the public record of the Salary Commission's consideration and adoption of Resolution No. 201I'1 indicates that the Administrator was asked tn submit x proposed draft oYResolution No. 2011-1 at the request of the Salary Commission Chair before the July 26, 20 11, Salary Commission meeting. Resolution No. 2011-1 was subsequently adopted ut the Salary Commission's August 5. 2011. meeting. It was also noted iutestimony that the Salary Commission had not met since November 20IO. At this same July 2G. 2011. meeting request by Mayor Bernard P. (]urvalbo. Jr.. dated July 15, 2011, to defer his salary increase scheduled to have taken effect on July 1, 20ll (as previously authorized 6ySmlory Commission Resolution No. 2OI0'l) was oothe Salary C000nuiomioo`m agenda for discussion. Also on the Salary Cooarniomioo'o Job/ 26. 20I1. agenda was Ordinance No. 907 (listed as Bill No. 2305. Draft l, A Bill for an Ordinance to Amend Chapter 3, of the Kaua'i County Code 1987, as Amended, Relating to the Salaries of County ()O3cexn and fCmp!oyees), which had incorporated the Administrator's position under the Salary Commission's salary—setting authority, / &auu'i County Charter;Section 29,03. Resolution.The commission's salary findings shall b^adopted by resolution of the commissionand forwarded to the mayor and the council on or before Xfarch L5.Subject to Section 2805. the resolution shall take effect without the mayor's and council's concurrence sixty days after its adoption unless rejected by a vote of not less than five members of the council, The council may reject either the oo,ure resolution o,any portion of it, The respective appointing authority may set the salary of an appointee at a figure lower than the figure established byordinance for the position, Aw EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER R/\O 11 -005 September 27. 2011 Page 2oy2 Testimony submitted to the Council during its J&ecuoaioaa no Resolution Nu. 20I1'1 raised concerns on whether the actions taken by the Salary Commission might involve various conflicts o[interest, Firet, rather than independently establishing the basis ofits salary—setting decisions io public meetings, the Salary Commission appears t* be functioning uy an "arm" of the Mayor's Administration. Since the Salary Commission's authority includes elected and appointed officers within the Administration, the question raised is whether having the Administrator submit u draft ofResolution No. 2011'1 to the Salary Commission with io8urozutiuu and guidance reflecting the Administration's salary—setting objectives (including the Mayor's July 15. 2011. request Co defer his July l. 201I. salary increase) with no prior guidance from the Salary Commission would involve a conflict o[interemt. SecooJ, the appearance of onufbut of interest in the relationship between the Office of Boards & Commissions and the Salary Commission is further exacerbated by the fact that Salary Commission Resolution No. 2011'1 (drafted by the Administrator atthe ceguomC of the Salary Commission Chair) also incorporated a salary schedule for the Administrator. Pursuant to Section 20.05 D.(2) of the Kaua'i County Charter2, I would request that the County ofFCaoa`i Board of Ethics render ao advisory opinion ou whether any n{the actions taken by the Salary Commission ioadopting Resolution No. 2Ull'1 contain conflicts uy interest between the Administration and Salary Commission. Please feel free to contact me if you may have any questions, or if you may require further information. Thank you for your ticualv consideration u{this request. Sincerely, Councilmember copy: Couocilroernberm Office of Boards 66Commissions Mayor Bernard P, Cmcval&o' Jr, Alfred B. Castillo, Jr.. County �kttoroey 2 Kaua'i County Charter;Section 20.05 D. b shall he the function of the board: (%)7o render advisory opinions^r interpretations with respect to application oy the code oorequest,All requests for advisory opinions shall be answered within forty five 05)days of its filing and failure to submit an advisory opinion within said forty fiww(45)days shall be deemed u finding vfmn breach nf the code, Opinions rendered or deemed rendered shall be binding on the board in any subsequent charges concerning the officer or employee^f the county until said opinion is amended or revoked 6y the board, .............. 3 2 October 3, 2011 9 Chair Paul Weil and Members of the Board of Ethics 4444 Rice Street, Suite 150 L-ihu'e, HI 96766 RE: Request for an Opinion by Council member Mel Rapozo Dear Chair Paul Weil and Members of the Board of Ethics, I am testifying as an individual and my comments are my personal opinions and not that of the Civil Service Commission of which I am a member. Council Member Rapozo stated that each board and commission should remain as an independent body. This statement was made in response to Mr. John Isobe's assistance in drafting a salary resolution. My understanding is that Mr. Isobe was asked by the Chair of the Salary Commission to draft a resolution so that the Salary Commission members could review it and make whatever changes they wanted to. As a member of the Civil Service Commission, I have on numerous occasions met with Mr. Isobe to get his prospective on a number of issues. At no time has Mr. Isobe responded by saying "this is the Administration's view". His response was always a neutral opinion and the final decision was always left for the Commission as a body to decide. If this Board finds that Mr. Isobe was in violation by assisting the Salary Commission,who will assist the various boards and commissions should a question arise? Will the various boards and commissions be mandated to be totally independent and not be able to get information/assistance from the Office of Boards and Commissions other than secretarial support? As a volunteer for the Civil Service Commission I strongly feel that we need proper guidance at all times. If this guidance can no longer be provided by the Administrator of the Office of Boards and Commissions. who will the various boards or commissions turn to get assistance?As Council Member Bynum stated, "I don't write my communications, I have staff write them,"My point is that boards and commissions should not be charged with the responsibility of writing draft documents or communications of any sort that require a background in government laws, policies and procedures. According to § 7,06B of the County of Kaua'i Charter: "B. The administrator shall assist in providing administrative and operational T-� support to the various county, boards and commissions. Such support shall include, but not be limited to: assisting in the recruitment,orientation,education, RAO 11-005 a. and training of board or commission members regarding their powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities under the charter, especially as such powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities may relate to the particular board or commission to which they have been appointed; helping to educate such members about applicable state and county ethics laws and the State Sunshine La,,v; assisting the Office of the Mayor to fill any -vacancies on any board or commission,, being a resource to assist the various county boards or commissions in gathering such information, documents, and data as such boards or commissioms, may deem necessary to perform its farictions; serving as a communications liaison between boards and commissions and the various county departments, offices, and agencies that such boards and commissions may interact with, to help ensure that various boards' and commissions' information needs are addressed in timely fashion." Thank you for allowing me to provide this testimony. Sinceretv Roy Morita Barbara Davis From- Bruce Pleas, Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:04 AM To: Barbara Davis Cc: Beth Tokioka,- Diane Zachary Subjeict: From Bruce Pleas KHCBCAC Chair Aloha Barbara, The Kekaha Host Community Benefit Community Action Committee requests agenda time at the next Ethics Board meeting for a decision on the following question, Are the KHCBCAC members required to submit the County of Kauai Disclosure Statement(Disclosure Form April 8, 2011)to the Board of Ethics? Mahalo, Bruce Pleas KHCBCAC Chair RACE 11 -006 Barbara Davis Subject: FW-. FILING OF DISCLOSURES From: Jose Bulatao, Jr. [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 20119:40 AM To: John Isobe; Mayor; Gary Neu; Jay Furfaro; jyukimura@; Tim Bynum; Dickie Chang; Kipukai KuaIii; Nadine Nakamura; Mel Rapozo; Bruce Pleas; RJack27; MEIIiott003; Diane Zachary; Thomas Nizo; Pauline Kupo Cc: mary buzasims; Lola Cruz; Robert Sims; Dennis Eguchi; Pastor Manny; gregg holzman; Patrick Pereira; Bobbie Franklin; Tanya Nitta; Herberta Hanakaulani Montgomery; Mary Manuel; Jimmy Torio; Millie Wellington; Jason-Yoshida/ Subject: Fw: FILING OF DISCLOSURES Aloha, We have shared responsibilities regarding the Kekaha HCB Fund allocation which has been granted to this community because Kekaha is in closest proximity to the County of Kauai's municipal landfill. With that in mind. I am requesting for the following excerpts to be forwarded to the members of the Board of Ethics Commission for review and comment. With regard to the work of the Kekaha HCB CAC, the question has been raised: Are members appointed to Citizens Advisory Committees (CAC) regarded to be equivalent to members appointed to Boards and Commissions (according to the Kauai Charter)? The excerpts below may provide insights in response to that question: Briefly, Charter Section 6.03 allows for the "creation of Advisory Committees." This is under Charter Article VI, Executive Branch, and it states: Section 6.03. Creation ofjdvisoa, Committees. The mayor or department heads, with the approval of the major. may each appoint advif oo; committees. Such advisory corm trees shall not exist beyond the term of office of the appointing authority. The members qfadvi.i o�y c-ommittee.f shall not be-paid, but their authorised expenses shall be_paid_f rom ap prw_ n.a tz o lf to the appointin g .ulhori3i. AdTi sor y conunittees shag have no employces but each a p oin lin g authority=Shall e au.ce efl�ployeej of the p de partment to furnish sud).fervieef as mays be needed by the committees. Under Charter Section 23.420, "members of all boards or commissions shall serve for staggered terms of three years...7' C The members of boards or conmVssions shag serve for staggered terms of three years and untit their successors are appointed. I lovvver, no holdover lemishal,!extend beyond ninety days. RAO 11-006 a a. This is a clear area where differentiation between committee and cone-nission is noted. Staggered terms do NOT apply to Citizens Advisory Committees. Also, under Charter Section 23.02, all boards or commissions are "...vested with the power and authority as provided hereunder which are not in conflict with the provisions of this Charter: Section 23.02. Boards and Commissions. The council may create such otlger boards and ooflIfflifsionf, not provided beran, by ordinance. -A//boards and to,-,vnviffions, including those x1Vd) are f t�l -ag e- i ll ro ided for P C -P V - berein., shall be organized, appointed and vested with the power and authority as provided hereunder which are not in conRict with the provisions of this charter. This means that boards or commissions also have subpoena powers, as provided for under Charter Section 23.02K: K. All boards and commissions shall have lhepoxer to fu&poena xitneffes and administer oaths to witnesses as In all matters mithin the scope of such boards or commissions. Here is another clear differentiation. Boards and Commissions have subpoena powers. This is NOT a power that is extended to citizens advisory committees. Also, members of boards or commissions are considered "officers of the County." Charter Section 13.01 ("Definitions") states: D. The term "officer" shall include the following: (2) Any person appointed as administrative head of any agency of the county, or as a member of any board or commission. fpm basis added_1 It appears that members of citizens advisory committees are NOT considered "officers of the County." Therefore, since the "Disclosure" section of the Charter under Article XX ("Code of Ethics") requires (among others) "members of boards and commissions" to file disclosures ,with the Board of Ethics, it is SILENT at best on members of advisory committees: 2 Section 20.04. Disclofure, A. The mqj�or. cou&ioerf onf, all de parlivent heads and ie. b of boardsand 117 deputies, Mern ers conwVssions and the purchasing adminif trator. and delegated :ed to ac/on behalf ql' the director ref finance and the depu,t, director of finance i n their aki-ence shall n4thin thirty= (3Q dq qfaKutmiu g qff-ice,file with the board a list of all real_propel within the couqj�in xhich he has any right, title or interest, a li.fl olfall b`ufinefs_#roif which contract'for couq,; bufineu in Which he has any interest and all their ace.f of _pL emplqj,ment, including pad-five em plo,, enl all sources and amounts ql"in come, business oxnershp , q#i er and directorpofitions, debts, creditor interests in in.oirent busineffe.�and the names of perfonf represented before ,gonernment a ,genaef. Amendments to Me list, * cludin g ad dilion , deletion or chagef i'n fili`e� i*n teref t i*n propey or of e)v p lo�,,nienl, shall be made within thirty (30) dqjs of the occurrence of the amendment. The list shall be a matter of public Pub" record. (14mended 2010 In light of the fact that I have served on other CAC's previously, I was NOT asked to fill a disclosure form. Consequently, there is a consistency factor in making this a requirement for the Kekaha HCB CAC. It was also pointed out that the Kekaha HCB is "dealing with huge sums of County funds." In "dealing with huge sums of County funds", the Kekaha HCB CAC only does so as a conduit to encourage and empower the community of Kekaha to expend that fund through projects and proposals that are deemed to be beneficial, appropriate, affordable, and approved by the community. The mayor and council will have recommend and release the funds to those projects and proposals that have been recommended and processed accordingly. Consequently, the CAC, itself, does NOT handle any of the funding directly. Furthermore, when this CAC was organized in April, 2009, NO ONE was required to provide this information (which is standard procedure for all Boards and Commissions. Two and a half years after this CAC was formed and in operation, we were asked to fin out this form within 30 days of being notified that we had not done this at the beginning as "required". This "requirement" is questionable. Therefore, I am requesting for an opinion from the Board of Ethics regarding this issue with clear and concise explanations to support its findings. Sincerely, Jose Bulatao,Jr. Vice-chair, Kekaha Host Community Benefit Citizens Advisory Committee 3