HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-24-2010-Doc15928. /
MINUTE S
PLANNING COMMITTEE
February 24, 2010
A meeting of the Planning Committee of the Council of the County of
Kauai, State of Hawaii, was called to order by Councilmember Jay Furfaro, Chair,
at the Historic County Building, Room 201, Lihu`e, Kauai, on Wednesday,
February 24, 2010, at 9:15 a.m., after which the following members answered the
call of the roll:
Honorable Tim Bynum
Honorable Jay Furfaro
Honorable Daryl W. Kaneshiro
Honorable Lani T. Kawahara
Honorable Derek S. K. Kawakami
Honorable Bill "Kaipo" Asing, Ex-Officio Member
Honorable Dickie Chang, Ex-Officio Member
The Committee proceeded on its agenda items, as shown in the following
Committee reports which are incorporated herein by reference.
CR-PL 2010-06: on Bill No. 2342 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS,
PROCEDURES, ZONING AND
DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE LIHU`E
TOWN CORE AREA AND ESTABLISHING
EXCEPTIONS, MODIFICATIONS AND
ADDITIONS TO CHAPTER 8 AND
CHAPTER 10 OF THE KAUAI COUNTY
CODE 1987
[Approved as Amended.]
There being no objections, the Committee recessed at 11:30.
The Committee reconvened at 11:39, and proceeded as follows:
JAY FURFARO (COMMITTEE CHAIR): We're going to call the
Committee back to order here after that short recess. And I would like to go to the
top of today's Planning agenda and if you could read Bill No. 2022 and Bill No. 2323
simultaneously, I'd like to speak about those bills at the same time.
Bill No. 2022 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8
OF THE KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, AS AMENDED,
RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE [This item was deferred.]
Bill No. 2023 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER
10 OF THE KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, AS
AMENDED, RELATING TO SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
PLANS [This item was deferred.]
Mr. Furfaro: I have asked to put these back on the
Council agenda and I want to reflect a little bit here for a moment if I can, you know
•
the General Plan document here is... is our plan and I know the Mayor has
indicated that they want to identify funding to update this plan and I perhaps
would like to say that is the right way to go rather than the new plan. These two
(2) bills 2022 and 2023 are actually the vehicles that are intended to address many
of the goals and objectives that were set out in the Kauai General Plan. The bill
2022 is a bill that turns many of the items that we've been dealing with into reality
from the General Plan. For example, we're dealing with the Administrations plan
that comes over now to talk about changes in the Open space but I can make this
reference because I sat on the Advisory Committee that did the General Plan,
although I didn't finish, I was transferred to the South Pacific but I also was a
member of the Planning Commission when the previous Planning Director
introduced 2022. My predecessor as Chair has left this bill dormant for a long time
and it was made dormant until such time that we could have a workshop. In 2022,
many of the things that we are now addressing that are in the vision of the ,General
Plan, are also covered in that bill and I'll just touch on a couple of them for you. For
example, we have now come to a solution dealing with the attrition of ADU's in the
agricultural areas and we did it by first having people declare that they wanted to
have the unit and then gave a time limit. That vision of needing to do that is in Bill
2022, but we've addressed it as pars. In bill 2022 is also a specific portion that the
Administration has sent over to us to deal with Open space. The Open space
suggested pieces are in 2022, rather than working it on a separate bill. But more
importantly in 2022 which are consistent with the General Plan vision, it also
addresses the possibility of looking at density on Ag property and looking at the
smart growth principle of clustering so that we can preserve Open space. I have
talked to past members of the Planning Department and current members and I
certainly would like to see that 2022 could be presented to us in a workshop two (2)
weeks from now on a Tuesday morning, the day before this bill would come back
and maybe have some time to actually hear those principles that support the
implementation of the General Plan on Open space, Ag density, the use of
clustering as well as the attrition of ADU's, which we have already covered so the
bill might have to be modified but it would be exceptionally appropriate for us now
to deal with looking at that bill and it was deferred until it could come out of
Committee. Now as the Committee Chairman, I would like to ask for some support
to put 2022 and 2023 in a workshop. 2023 specifically deals with the portions of the
neighborhood plans in the North Shore and in the Po`ipu - Kalaheo area as it
relates to some of the suggested changes in clustering, so that is what I would like
to do in two (2) weeks is be prepared to schedule a workshop and have some past
members of the Planning Department come in and speak to us. It's a very
sophisticated kind of scale to implement Ag density and clustering but you can see
that it addresses many of the things that constantly come up because there are
policies that are in the General Plan. We have to remember that the General Plan
is not a resolution; the General Plan is an ordinance that says this is what you need
to do to set the planning goals going forward. So I would simply like to ask for your
support to schedule roughly in two (2) weeks a Planning Workshop on 2022 and
2023. Can I have any discussion? Mr. Bynum.
TIM BYNUM (COMMITTEE MEMBER): Yeah.
Mr. Furfaro: I just was reminded as I spoke that I have to
also remember the date will be subject to the two (2) Planning Tuesdays where the
Planning Department doesn't have a Planning Meeting. Mr. Bynum the floor
recognizes.
Mr. Bynum: Yeah I wanted to discuss these bills because
2
in preparation for the Open space bill you know I've spent a lot of time reviewing
the Council transcripts from 2000, 2002 and the General Plan and as the schedule
indicated... as the agenda indicated these bills were deferred in 2002, pending a
workshop, a lot has happened since 2002 and in reviewing those bills and the
discussion that happened at Council at that time, I actually prepared a presentation
if necessary to discuss that related to the Open space bill because you are actually
correct there's a lot of overlay and that... I believe was historically the Planning
Department's you know following through with the General Plan recommendations
as you indicated. So I welcome the idea of a workshop, I just would want to point
out that we've had eight (8) years of water under the bridge since then and as you
indicated while there are really good concepts in those bills, some of them may not
be as applicable as they were in 2002 but to go back to the concept of appropriately
managing agricultural lands and you know applying some of these principles, I
think is a really welcome idea. I think that these issues are very important for the
County of Kauai and I would be hopeful that if we do schedule a workshop that it
be made available to the public by recording it and making it available on Ho`ike.
You know we just had a workshop, a great workshop on the Lihu`e Town Core Plan
that we didn't make those arrangements and we kind of repeated some of that today
for the public's benefit so you know these are complex issues and I welcome... I
appreciate the leadership from our Planning Chair to put forward those concepts
because you know the Open space bill that we currently have before us is only a
portion of some of the goals that this 2022 attempted to address. A short version of
everything I just said, great idea to do a workshop, hopefully it's available to the
public and so we don't have to repeat until we bring those concepts back to the floor.
Mr. Furfaro: Just to address a couple of your concerns, I
understand you've been working on it as a member of the Planning Committee and
I want to reiterate that I've only been the Planning Chair for the last fourteen (14)
months, but I've been working on this since I volunteered for the CZO, that I served
on the General Plan update. You're absolutely correct, this bill is about
implementation of the kind of guidance that is being provided in the General Plan.
I have subsequently addressed some of the things that I'm aware of when I served
on the Planning Committee, for example, how do we successfully exit from the ADU
piece, we've addressed that. This bill that's coming up is talking in reference to the
Open space; I think it's maybe time that we revisit this. I also want to give an
explanation that I sent to many of you on this past workshop because the Planning
Department exhausted their Lihu`e Town Core Planning budget, I decided to
request within our Council budget, we pick up the travel expenses for PBR for Kimi
and bring them over for a workshop. So those are cost that we incurred because
their budget was exceeded and therefore I made the choice of having the workshop
for the Lihu`e Town Core with PBR present versus the idea that we would arrive
this week and we would be re-video presenting the maps and the scope of the
ordinance changes and so forth. So it was for that purpose in getting Kimi over
here which was a very important part of the workshop that I made those decisions,
so I heard you on the second portion and you know that is certainly a possibility but
I don't want us to think that there was any purpose in not doing video presentation
twice. The purpose was making sure that we had Kimi here to help in the
presentation. so... Mr. Kaneshiro.
DARYL W. KANESHIRO (COMMITTEE MEMBER): I just wanted to
make some clarification that possibly because it's been in the book since 2002, I was
in the Council in 2002 and I needed to let you know that moneys were appropriated
to do the CZO update with previous Council to when I came on already had a
process going where they appropriated I believe almost a hundred thousand dollars
•
($100,000) to do this CZO update. In my years I remember that even till today
currently we have about two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) appropriated to
do the CZO update so it's not that we just to wash things away, I believe there was
a process in place. The process took a little longer and so this ordinances were
provided by the Chair and brought up and the efforts that Mr. Bynum and everyone
else is doing so I still want people to understand that there was a process in place.
It took longer, we've appropriated money to have it done and if you go back and look
at all those records you can date it back to before I was even on the Council to the
1996 or 1994 we had a CZO update already in the works in regards to the Open
districts so...
Mr. Furfaro: Yes.
Mr. Kaneshiro: So I wanted to point that out that it's been
an ongoing process.
Mr. Furfaro: I think that was an excellent point to share
you know we moved the Lihu`e Town Core Plan just now out of Committee, it took
us six (6) years to get there but things don't quite move that rapidly and I do want
to acknowledge your comments because I think that the Planning Director Mr.
Costa has committed to us a September report on the updated CZO and that is on
record.
Mr. Kaneshiro: Yep.
Mr. Furfaro: And that money was there but I just would
like to get some feeling about airing these two (2) in a workshop.
Mr. Kaneshiro: And I fully support that.
Mr. Furfaro: Thank you. Any other Committee members,
comments on this? If not, thank you Mr. Bynum, thank you Mr. Kaneshiro for
those quick summaries and we will coordinate with the Planning Department when
we could have the workshop on 2022 and 2023, and we've addressed many of those
issues already but I think we should look at the Ag piece before we get to the update
of the CZO so.
Mr. Kaneshiro: I'll go ahead and make a motion to defer
pending the workshop.
Mr. Furfaro: May I have a second?
Mr. Bynum: Seconded.
Mr. Furfaro: Thank you very much. Any further
discussion? All those in favor say "aye."
Committee Members: Aye.
Upon motion duly made by Councilmember Kaneshiro, and seconded by
Councilmember Bynum, and unanimously carried, Bill No. 2022 and Bill No.
2023 were deferred.
Mr. Furfaro: Can we read the next item Bill No. 2298.
4
BILL NO. 2298 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8,
KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, AS AMENDED,
RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND SINGLE-FAMILY TRANSIENT
VACATION RENTALS [This item was deferred.]
Mr. Furfaro: Thank you. I would like to ask... I believe
that the County Attorney had circulated some comments today to us, am I correct?
ALFRED B. CASTILLO, JR. (COUNTY ATTORNEY): That is true.
Mr. Furfaro: That is true, okay. Does everybody have
those copies? And I believe what is being said here... in that copy, there's some
suggested amendments to bi112998.
Mr. Castillo: 2298.
Mr. Furfaro: 2298, I'm sorry. And I guess after I've looked
at them I still... as Chairman of the Committee I have some questions of the
principles of what makes up a substantial change and so I feel I would like to
request an Executive Session with the Committee of the Whole to review your
suggested amendments, that's where I'm at right now. But since we have it as an
agenda item I'll ask the public if there's any testimony on their part? Is there
anyone that would like to speak? Yes.
There being no objections, the rules were suspended.
BARBARA RO$ESON: Thank you Committee Chair Furfaro, Chair
Asing and Councilmembers. For the record my name is Barbara Robeson and
handing out my quick testimony regarding the TVR bill 2298. I just have a couple
of suggestions on the bill itself and I numbered these pages, they're attached to my
testimony. The first one is on page three (3) and my suggestion is to add in there
where I indicated "County building codes" and the second addition is on page four
(4) of the bill itself and that would be to add in "sworn TVR Affidavit" and that
would be to comply with the nonconforming use certificate application requirements
that are in the original bill. Now I do have some concerns about the "sworn
affidavit" which is also attached to my testimony. And as I indicated on the copy of
the affidavit that item number three (3) that the applicant swears that they have
operated a transient vacation rental on the property since some particular date.
And the TVR, the exsisting ordinance states that the in section eight dash
seventeen point eleven (a) (8-17.11a) violations of conditions of approval or
providing false or misleading information on the application etc... So my concern is
specifically to the Wainiha and Haena area at least in that area, in particular a
number of approved TVR's had applicants who claimed homeowner's exemptions on
their property taxes. And was this issue considered before the TVR in use permits
was approved. And if so or is there a violation of the TVR ordinance if they falsely
claimed information. So I just concluding quickly with a couple of questions, if the
applicant lived in their house, would it still qualify as a TVR? And the second one,
my second question is should those approved TVR's be rewarded if they provided
false information to get their permit, and that's all I have, thank you.
Mr. Furfaro: Thank you Barbara, let me see if there's any
questions. Does anybody have any questions of Barbara? No. Thank you.
5
•
CAREN DIAMOND: Aloha Council, Caren Diamond. My first
issue is one of governance and I went to a County Council meeting on Maui and was
quite happy to see that on the bottom of their paper it says "approved as to form
and legality" and so before anything comes up in front of the public, in front of...
gets listed on the agenda, it's already approved as to its form and being legal. And I
want to use it as example on a bill like this where we had to come as citizens where
it's been sixteen (16) times or how many times and we're awaiting still opinions
whether something legal or not legal from the County Attorney yet the public has to
come and I ask if in good governance if that could be added to Council before things
come up. And then in this case you know as this bill does it comply with 205A, does
it specifically comply or doesn't it. And it looks like when I read 205A there's a
special use permit that is the process and as I look at the amendments to this bill
and (d) has basically it says "upon expiration of this un-enforcement agreement
then you go ahead and follow that process, I never heard of a county implementing
an un-enforcement agreement that has the Director agreed not to enforce and if
we're talking agriculture land, the only ways these places got approved to begin
with was they said they were farms and it was a farm dwelling and so now I don't
understand it wasn't a farm dwelling, it was a transient vacation rental and now
you want to grant them grandfather status because of that? That doesn't... I don't
understand that and I don't think it complies with 205A either. The second thing I
would like to say is accountability, the vacation rental ordinances has had zero
accountability in the implementation. As citizens, we have been unable to get any
records. As the Council, we have gotten no help in actually being transparent of
what the County has approved and I don't really think that more... more things
should be given to the Planning Department to actually do until we have gotten
accountability about what has happened, has our residential areas turned into a
resort? Or now our agricultural lands going to turn into a resort. And the entire
zoning where we had resort areas and residential areas and the reasons for having
specific residential areas and the reasons for having those resort areas and if you
look at our hotel sector now, we have the lowest, lowest occupancy rates in the
hotels, while we're building the vacation rental business in our neighborhoods.
Mr. Furfaro: Caren, I'll give you an additional three (3)
minutes.
Ms. Diamond: Thank you. ITT have the capability to do an
incredible work on this, most of it was supposed to be put on the website at some
point... much of it was on the website but we haven't been able to get any
correlations, nothing to compile the data, how many vacation rentals got approved
on the North Shore, how many in Hanalei, how many in Wainiha, how many in
were there before when the reports were being compiled, and how many have been
approved now? So before you give additional work, we really like accountability of
what has transpired and the ITT website actually could be updated so that
information is available to the public because as it is now this is... we have the
secret resort and we have what is approved is secret and the inspection reports are
secret and you know did the building... is the building what it was when it was
built? It's all secret. And we're asking for more secret stuff not to get approved and
not... no additions to the TVR, ordinances until these things are straightened out. I
hear Papaa Bay is remodeling itself to be a transient vacation rental, think about
the can of worms you're going to open if you change this without putting in any
protections at all. And after saying that, I want to say I'm not against the little
cottages on farm land, a farmer who has a farm, who has a little vacation rental
cottage, that's fine. And I think the process for approval and making that legal is
6
f
already there with the State Special Use Permit which goes through the Planning
Commission and we're not against that and so if you're planning on approving
anything, we'd ask you to have a couple regulations like that they be a real farm,
not that you put in one after but that you actually already have one and you've filed
your scheduled (f's) and you have been operating as a farm and in additional I also
ask for some size restrictions so we don't have the ten (10) bedroom, ten (10)
bathroom agricultural place be grandfathered in. And the last thing I would like to
address real quickly is just the takings and you know there's amulti-prong test for
takings, it's not just you say "you can't vacation rental it" and people have a case for
takings, as long as you have the use of your property in other ways, there is no
takings. So I think that's just a bogus argument here and I ask you to think about
protecting our Ag land if it is allowed to be used as a resort, nobody's going to be
able to farm the land, we're not going to be able to afford farm land, the price of it is
just going to go up and up. Thank you for your considerations.
Mr. Furfaro: Thank you. Any questions of Caren? If not,
thank you. Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak?
KEN TAYLOR: Chair, members of the Council, my name is
Ken Taylor. First of all I would like to say that I support comments from the two (2)
previous speakers. I hope that you folks listen carefully to what they had to say.
And that you will give it some serious thought and consideration. I also think that
in this whole planning process one of the things that we need to get in place and to
protect the outlying Open areas and Ag lands is growth boundaries in all the major
communities and that would go a long ways to solving some of these problems and
until that's done, we're going to continue to 'see the areas erode into the
development of one sort or another. So please, please consider what the two (2)
previous speakers have had to say and deliberate on their comments and let's get
this thing resolved, thank you.
Mr. Furfaro: Thank you. Is there anyone else from the
public who would like to speak? If not, I'm going to call the meeting back to order
and if my colleagues would give me a few moments I just want to say that you know
I certainly believe that anytime we plant the seed about more lands disappearing
and so forth, we forget that in the General Plan... the General Plan basically said
we need to regulate vacation rentals and this was driven from an opinion from the
Deputy County Attorney and often referred to as the Kobayashi comments and
those were comments that Mr. Kobayashi shared it with the Council, I think it was
addressed at the time to Councilman Swain. It was done publicly and I think those
of us that served on the Citizens Advisory Committee for the General Plan
recognized what was being said in that letter. We recognized it to the point that the
General Plan said we need to regulate it. And I think what Mr. Kobayashi was
saying is, you need to draw that line in the sand but any new prohibition cannot go
backwards, it can't go backwards, we have to find a way to address regulating this
and at the same time you know find a way to have some attrition by setting up
certain goals that we could lawfully expect from people who were operating
transient vacation rentals. You know one of the things that's very awkward for me
and I'm going to touch on this if I can is that fact that the State often says things
kind of like in general but they don't come down with any rules. Okay we're
battling that right now in a farm workers bill. The State says in the important Ag
land piece that you can have farm worker housing but they give you no parameters
as to what a farm worker housing opportunity is. You know it says "shoot for the
moon, we don't care if you go this way, that way, this way, this way, get to the
moon" but you can have farm worker housing so I've been working with members of
7
•
the staff here to establish some of those criterias that Caren Diamond just
mentioned. There is nothing that prevents them from applying for farm worker
housing in the important Ag land bill as it stands. Farm worker housing is
something the plan says you need to have to support farming but it doesn't limit...
ah you can have three (3) dwellings but between the three (3) you get no more than
eighteen hundred (1,800) square feet, you have to provide your plan and your plan
says, you know organic farming or not. So we have to have a farm worker bill that
gives the State policy some parameters, the same is true for all of this. The State
had no dilemma about collecting the taxes, the State clearly says we couldn't
advertise the people that had vacation rentals, I used that early in another bill. In
other words you can't go backwards, so we have to set up rules. And Caren touched
on this again that the rules and the approval of form and matter should be on the
Council's agendas, that's why we have other Commissions, whether they are Fire,
Planning and so forth, we expect them to come up with those sets of rules and we
said that in the bill, we said that in the bill and in that bill it... you pointed out
some things that could have been accomplished, unfortunately weren't. We were
prepared to give extra staffing, we were prepared to give extra time but it didn't
happen so I'm just trying to appeal right now to your senseability on this you know
the keying intellectual perception of what the General Plan said to what we had to
do. We should regulate. The line is drawn in the sand for March eighth (8th) no
new vacation rentals, anywhere. The State doesn't give us clear definitions on the
Important Ag lands, we have to create that so I want to let Barbara know that I
think you gave us some good pieces here especially on the affidavit, you know
somebody swears that they're doing this, they got that kind of revenue and so forth
and notarize it, that means you're liable for your statement as far as I'm concerned
but to... please understand that this Council is now trying and yes I'm sorry Caren
it's taking sixteen (16) deferrals but we're trying to do it right, we're trying to look
at everything that's under every tree and that's why I'm saying right now I got some
questions on the principles that deal with you know substantial changes in the bill
that's why I'm looking for the deferral and that's why I want to have an Executive
Session in the Committee of the Whole that Mr. Asing will Chair, that's how I'm
feeling right now as the Planning Chairman. So Mr. Bynum, I will go to recognize
you but I'm just asking others not to be thinking that this Council isn't trying to be
accountable, heck we just appointed a Citizens Committee made up of all of those
that are looking at the Important Ag land bill. This bill says these exceptions may
only be made until the Important Ag land bill is identified, those lands anyway so
be patient so we can do it to the best of our ability. Mr. Bynum.
Mr. Bynum: Thank you Mr. Chair. I sense the... well I'll
share... I'm frustrated that we haven't... that we have a number of deferrals on this
but I think the Chair's comments are correct that we need to get it right. The...
this has been a long time coming since way before I was on the Council, this was
discussed and you talked about the Kobayashi manner and you know which is kind
of infamous now but you now some parts get left out of that sometimes he said you
know he gave an opinion and then said "and if the Council you know feels
differently or be prudent to regulate this, it would be prudent to..." and the General
Plan said regulate. That was more than just about ten (10) years ago so when we
were on the Council, everybody knows let watch this... on March seventh (7th) 2008,
as you indicated we finally in my opinion said you know what from this point
forward nobody who wasn't lawfully in use will be allowed to do vacation rentals,
TVR.'s outside of the VDA. The rub comes on... the lawful and use. That is very
complex it turns out in the State of Hawaii and as you also indicated we haven't
received clarity from the State, there were court cases in the past that might have
brought about some clarity but those cases were settled and so the courts haven't
8
~~
given clarity, the State in my opinion has not given clarity and it falls on the
County of Kauai to provide that clarity for farm worker housing, for TVR's and
we're looking at trying to resolve this issue in a way that it is fair and lawful as
possible. I like Ms. Diamond's about form and clarity and that's an issue we may
want to look at and the way we structure and the way we work things in Council
because it is kind of a routine on Maui that when a bill is introduced it's been
reviewed for form and clarity, those aren't advices or opinions, it just says... it's in
the proper form and it's you know it's lawfully constructed. We do, do that here we
just haven't formalized that process in a way that makes it clear to the public. And
so I wish that we were introducing amendments to bring that clarity but I
reluctantly concur that we need some more time in discussion. It's frustrating to
lay this thing off. The... but I really want to point out... and then Ms. Diamond
mentioned some plan to do vacation rentals at Papaa Bay, as far as I know Papaa
Bay has never had a vacation rental.
Mr. Furfaro: And I would like to clarify us that the
agenda item is not Papaa Bay today and therefore you already made the point as I
have that there are no new permits out there.
Mr. Bynum: Right. And I'll just add to that just by saying
and thank you for that clarification that I don't believe that it's anybody intent in
any way space or form that I'm aware of to not keep that line drawn in the sand,
we're just arguing about what was already out there so and it is complex and
difficult, I would hope that within two (2) to three (3) weeks we either have
amendments to this bill or a new bill to try to bring that clarity and so reluctantly
I'll be supporting the call for a deferral today.
Mr. Furfaro: Okay I'm back to looking for a deferral.
DEREK S. K. KAWAKAMI (COMMITTEE MEMBER): Move to defer.
Mr. Kaneshiro:
Mr. Furfaro:
say "aye".
Committee Members:
Mr. Furfaro:
Seconded.
Thank you Mr. Kaneshiro. All those in favor
Aye.
Thank you very much.
Upon motion duly made by Councilmember Kawakami, seconded by
Councilmember Kaneshiro, and unanimously carried, Bill No. 2298 was
deferred.
Mr. Furfaro: We are deferring this and Mr. Attorney, I
will send over my query about my early statement.
Mr. Castillo: Thank you.
Mr. Furfaro: Okay. Could we have the next item please?
No, we're done in the Planning Committee.
Ms. Simao: Bill No. 2339.
9
1 ~ ..
Mr. Furfaro: Oh shocks. I'm hungry... Okay 2339, I'm
sorry I drew a line through it earlier, my apologies.
BILL NO. 2339 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ARTICLE 8 OF CHAPTER 8 OF THE KAUAI
COUNTY CODE 1987, AS AMENDED,
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN
THE OPEN DISTRICT
[This item was deferred.]
Mr. Furfaro: Okay my earlier statement when I was... I
was hoping that we could have this workshop... (Inaudible) Excuse me?
Mr. Kaneshiro:
See if there's anybody in the public.
Mr. Furfaro: Is there anybody in the public that would
like to speak on this item? If not, I will call the meeting back to order.
Mr. Kaneshiro:
Mr. Kawakami:
Move to defer.
Second.
Mr. Furfaro: Okay it's been moved to defer and seconded,
all those in favor of the deferral please say "aye."
Committee Members: Aye.
Upon motion duly made by Councilmember Kaneshiro, seconded by
Councilmember Kawakami, and unanimously carried, Bill No. 2339 was
deferred.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,.
~_ GM ~l,~~wc~l~rn~ G(,~---
Darrellyne M. Simao
Council Services Assistant I
APPROVED at th~mmittee Meeting held on March 10, 2010:
JAYS
Chair
10