HomeMy WebLinkAbout011413 CCC Open Session_APPROVED_1m(cz)(tt)COUNTY OF KAUAI
Minutes of Meeting
OPEN SESSION
Board /Committee:
I COST CONTROLCOMMISSION
Meeting Date
I January 14, 2013
Location
Mo'ikeha Building — Liquor Conference Room 3
Start of Meeting: 1:30 p.m.
I End of Meeting: 2:56 p.m.
Present
Chair Sandi Sterker; Vice -Chair Arryl Kaneshiro; Members: Dirk Apao; Lawrence Chaffin Jr., Glen Takenouchi; and Laurie Yoshida
Also present: First Deputy County Attorney Amy Esaki; Board & Commissions Office Staff. Support Clerk Mercedes Youn;
Administrator Paula Morikami; Administrative Aide Teresa Tamura; Council Services Review Officer Scott Sato; Purchasing and
Budget Director Ernest Barreira; and County Attorney Alfred Castillo, Jr.
Excused
Absent
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Call To Order
Chair Sterker called the meeting to order at 1:30
p.m.
Approval of
Regular Open Session Minutes of December 10, 2012
Commissioner Takenouchi moved to approve
Minutes
the minutes as circulated. Commissioner
Chaffin seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Communications
CCC 2013 -01 Memorandum dated 12/13/12 from Council Chair Jay
Furfaro to Chair Dirk Apao and Members of the Cost Control Commission,
requesting agenda time to make a presentation on the financial position of
the County of Kauai as it relates to Departmental expenditures versus
budgeted amounts.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive item CCC 2013 -01.
Commissioner Yoshida moved to receive item
CCC 2013 -01. Commissioner Chaffin seconded
the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
The following three (3) communications were distributed to the members
and added to the agenda prior to the meeting:
• Memorandum dated 01/04/13 from Council Chair Jay Furfaro was
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 2
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
distributed to the members requesting for a deferral of his
presentation relating to Departmental Expenditures versus
Budgeted Amounts.
• Copy of Communication dated 12/07/12 from Mayor Bernard P.
Carvalho, Jr. to Council Chair Jay Furfaro, regarding plans to use
the Pi'ikoi space vacated by Big Save, Inc. for additional storage
and archival purposes.
• Memorandum dated 01/09/13 from Council Chair Jay Furfaro,
regarding information on a list of all vacant positions in the County
of Kauai as of December 31, 2012, and a request from Council to
the Department of Public Works, Building Division regarding the
Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity.
Scott Sato, Council Services Review Officer, stated that he is here today to
represent Council Chair Furfaro, who was unable to attend the meeting due
to a family matter. Mr. Sato began by presenting an overview of the
information, and invited the Commission to ask questions or, if needed,
request for any additional information by contacting Council Services who
would be able assist the Commission.
Chair Sterker stated that she had no specific questions at this time and
suggested that the Commission defer this item for continued discussion and
deliberation at the next meeting in February in anticipation of Council
Commissioner Yoshida moved to defer item
Chair Furfaro's return.
CCC 2013 -01. Commissioner Chaffin seconded
the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
CCC 2013 -02 Memorandum dated 12/12/12 from Chair Dirk Apao to Ben
Sullivan, Economic Development Specialist, requesting for information as
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 3
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
it relates to energy savings for County facilities.
• A copy of an e -mail dated 01/09/13 from Energy Coordinator Ben
Sullivan, regarding a response relating to the air conditioning
system in the Police Department.
Commissioner Yoshida indicated that the response from Mr. Sullivan did
not provide the answers to the specific questions regarding energy savings
for County facilities. Chair Sterker stated that she agrees with
Commissioner Yoshida, and asked whether there were plans to implement
a photovoltaic system in the Police Department facility. Commissioner
Yoshida stated that it is her understanding that no plans were initiated to
install a photovoltaic system in the building.
Chair Sterker questioned whether there was any thought to install a
photovoltaic system in the future. First Deputy County Attorney Amy
Esaki suggested that the Commission refer the question to the Office of
Economic Development. Chair Sterker requested that the Commission be
provided with information on whether the County is considering a plan to
install a photovoltaic system in any of its facilities.
Commissioner Chaffin questioned whether the Commission may want to
consider a recommendation to include a design plan as part of the Energy
Savings Performance Contract that would include installation plans of a
photovoltaic system in County facilities. If successful, this would yield
significant savings. He explained that initially, it is estimated to be more
cost effective to install a single central air cooling system at the time of
construction than it is to install two (2) separate systems because each unit
is going, in the long run, cost the County more.
Commissioner Yoshida stated that the design plan should only include
those facilities that are utilized 24/7.
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 4
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
With no further discussion, Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive
both items.
Commissioner Chaffin moved to receive item
CCC 2013 -02 and the e -mail dated 01/09/13.
Commissioner Takenouchi seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
CCC 2013 -03 Communication dated 10/26/12 from First Deputy County
Attorney Amy Esaki, to Chair Dirk Apao and Members of the Cost Control
Commission, regarding information as it relates to real property profit
organization exemption list.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive item CCC 2013 -03.
Commissioner Chaffin moved to receive item
CCC 2013 -03. Commissioner Takenouchi
seconded the motion.
Chair Sterker stated that according to Ms. Esaki's response, she indicated
that the County's real property records showed only thirty -two (32) non-
profits out of the three hundred (300) parcels listed are paying more than
the minimum tax. She asked for a listing of the 32 non - profit organizations
that are paying more than the minimum tax.
Commissioner Chaffin asked how much more than the minimum are the
non - profit organizations paying and whether it would make sense to have
everyone pay below the minimum to save the County money. Ms. Esaki
explained that the non - profits who are leasing to a private organization for
profit are getting assessed at the normal tax rate.
Commissioner Yoshida commented that it could also work the exact
opposite because there are some non - profit organizations who lease for
profit that were able to carve out an exemption based on the conditions of
their lease, which made it possible for them to be able to qualify for the
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 5
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
non - profit tax exemption.
Ms. Esaki acknowledged the request and stated that she would provide the
information prior to the next meeting in February. She advised the
Commission that since a motion had already been made to "receive" this
item, she suggested that the Commission withdraw its motion and make a
new motion to defer the matter for continued discussion in February.
Commissioner Chaffin moved to withdraw his
motion. Commissioner Takenouchi seconded
the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Commissioner Yoshida moved to defer item
CCC 2013 -03. Commissioner Takenouchi
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Business
CCC 2012 -13 Discussion on the County's travel budget, per diem polices,
and expenditures. (On-going)
• (d) Memorandum dated 12/12/12 from Chair Dirk Apao to Wallace
Rezentes, Jr., Director of Finance, requesting for additional
information as it relates to the County's travel budget.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive item CCC 2012 -13 (d).
Commissioner Takenouchi moved to receive
item CCC 2012 -13 (d). Commissioner Yoshida
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
• Communication dated 01/02/13 from Ernest Barreira, Budget
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 6
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Purchasing Director, to the Cost Control Commission, regarding
updated travel information.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive the communication dated
Commissioner Yoshida moved to receive the
01/02/13 from Purchasing and Budget Director Ernest Barreira, regarding
communication dated 01/02/13. Commissioner
updated travel information.
Chaffin seconded the motion.
Mr. Barreira entered the meeting at 1:57 p.m.
Ernest Barreira, Budget and Purchasing Director presented a report on the
Budget Travel (General & Training) original & revised. He explained that
the direct comparisons between each fiscal year are very difficult to do in
this situation because as the County continues to improve on its budgeting
process it is getting more detailed. For example, the 2012 numbers will not
allow a direct comparison between 2011 and 2010 because the way the
funds were allocated within the budget appropriations package may have
differed. Mr. Barreira stated that he would like an opportunity to visit the
Commission next year because he would be able to provide the
Commission with finite pieces of the different elements of travel from both
the funding source perspective as well as elements such as what is tuition,
actual airfare, and per diem, etc.
Mr. Barreira stated that the Budget Analyst instructions for this year, as
well as for fiscal year 2014, were made very clear to the departments that
in the upcoming fiscal year they are to budget much more specifically for
all travel related items. Mr. Barreira added that his office has allocated the
proper account numbers so that they can measure it much better because
they found it difficult to measure based on a lump sum of numbers when
they don't know how much of that is comprised of travel, and how much of
it involved per diem or other types of travel related expenditures.
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 7
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Mr. Barreira acknowledged that the data that was provided to the
Commission was not particularly useful to the Commission from a year to
year comparison, although the Commission can look at the totals and
garner an idea of what his office is doing in terms of travel patterns.
Chair Sterker asked whether it would be cost effective for the County to
have the trainer (s) come to Kauai rather than having a bunch of people
who have to travel to the conference. Mr. Barreira agreed, and explained
that in his former employment at the State level, the State was committed
in purchasing technological equipment which afforded for video
conference capabilities.
Mr. Barreira noted that the real question is whether there is a better return
on investment to achieve the same or better outcome and at the same time
be conscientious about the cost involved. Mr. Barreira explained that
there are some travels that are grant related. Once you apply for the grant
and receive grant funds partially attributable to travel related requirements,
if you don't meet those requirements it could be a violation of the grant
reward. But more often than not, for travel that is budgeted under general
funds or in special funds, the intention is to take a closer look at travel and
see if there is a better way to achieve the desired outcome without having
to expend as much money. Mr. Barreira informed the Commission that his
office has not made any decisions or recommendations to the Mayor and
that everything including travel will be looked at very closely in the
upcoming year.
Commissioner Yoshida stated that in the Budget and Travel Report she
noticed that in the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney there was very little
money spent. She asked whether that meant that the monies were lost or
whether it was money that was not allocated to make them cautious in
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 8
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
spending money that was never received. Mr. Barreira stated that he could
not provide a definite answer because it depends on the nature of the
funding source. He explained that many times there is a definite end date
for the funding and, whether it is provided by the federal or state funds, he
is not sure whether it would lapse as a result of it not being expedited for
the travel in which the funds were budgeted.
Mr. Barreira assured the Commission that his office is taking a closer look
when conducting an analysis on budgeted amounts on what was expedited
and whether there is an opportunity to address that proactively.
Commissioner Chaffin asked, in his new position as the County's Budget
and Purchasing Director, what other overall improvements could be made
in the County. Mr. Barreira explained that prior to 2012 the budget
division was handled by Mr. Alvin Honda who served in his capacity as the
County's Budget Administrator for about 40 years. At the time of his
retirement, it was determined that a division comprised of an Analyst as
well as an Administrative post would best meet the needs of the County in
terms of moving forward in executing effective and efficient budget
polices.
He further explained that his role as the County's Budget and Purchasing
Director is unusual because the position doesn't exist in both the state and
county. When he was asked by the Mayor to hold down both positions
(Assistant Chief Procurement Officer and Budget /Purchasing Director) he
agreed because he felt that every other element in the County operations is
very much related and that every dollar that is spent finds its way through
the Division of Purchasing. He stated that with the creation of a new
Budget Team, it saved the County roughly $10,000 and is comprised of
three (3) individuals which includes himself and two (2) Budget Analysts -
Ms. Ann Wooten and Mr. Ken Shimonishi
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 9
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Mr. Barreira stated that the vision for his office is to look at, not only the
County's current budgeting process in terms of revenues and expenditures,
but to also look toward budgeting for outcomes. This is a very big initiative
for his office in terms of planning, which is to find a better way to allocate
the County's resources based on a comprehensive review of what the
county does and what the charge is to the public, and to make sure that the
County allocates adequate resources to meet its highest priority needs. He
stated that the biggest challenge his department now faces is the absence of
Finance Director Wallace Rezentes, Jr., who has been with the County for
over 14 years.
Chair Sterker asked whether the reduction in training costs was due to the
increased use of social media. Mr. Barreira replied that not every training
and travel can be replaced by some technical resource because sometimes
you have to be in the same room. He added that more research is needed to
see whether social media is indeed more cost effective.
Mr. Barreira left the meeting at 2:10 p.m.
Chair Sterker stated that based on Mr. Barreira's informative presentation,
she felt that the Commission no longer needed to pursue the travel budget
for now, and suggested that the Commission wait for another update from
Mr. Barreira in the future.
With no further discussion, Chair Sterker called for the vote.
Motion carried 6:0
CCC 2012 -15 Discussion on the County's real property tax age
exemptions. (On- going)
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 10
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
• (c) Memorandum dated 12/11/12 from Chair Dirk Apao to Wallace
Rezentes, Jr., regarding a request for additional information as it
relates to Age Tax Exemption.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive item CCC 2012 -15 (c).
Commissioner Chaffin moved to receive item
CCC 2012 -15 (c). Commissioner Takenouchi
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Chair Sterker noted that she thought the memorandum should have read
age 65 and over rather than age 60 and over. Ms. Morikami clarified to the
Commission that based on its discussion at its last meeting, on a proposal
to amend the current tax age exemption by eliminating the middle age
bracket, some Commissioners shared their concerns that the
recommendation lacked certain key elements specifically on what the
ramifications would be to eliminate the middle tax age bracket. A motion
was made by Commissioner Kaneshiro to specifically request information
on the age exemption for age 60 and 60 and over in which the motion
passed.
Commissioner Kaneshiro added that the Commission had previously asked
for information on age tax exemption for age 65 and over however, the real
property tax division was not able to provide that type of information
because the age bracket was not broken out as age 65 and over.
Commissioner Yoshida asked whether the Commission would feel
comfortable to assume that majority of the 3,490 taxpayers aged 60 to 69
with home use exemptions are half that amount. Chair Sterker estimated
that at least 1700 plus taxpayers that are in the Homestead tax class would
lose their tax exemption if the Age Exemptions were broken out in two
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 11
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
categories. Commissioner Yoshida indicated that it would be hard to
adequately determine what the cost and time savings would amount to as
far as reducing on the age exemptions, and felt that there would no real
cost savings for the County.
Commissioner Kaneshiro stated that he agrees with Commissioner Yoshida
that there would be no real cost savings for the County because of the time
and effort expended by the real property tax division in processing each tax
category. Whether there is one or two would not make a difference because
it still has to be done manually.
Chair Sterker asked whether the Commission wanted to continue to pursue
a proposal to raise the minimum age to qualify for an age- related real
property tax exemption. Commissioner Yoshida stated that although the
recommendation may lessen the workload in processing time, the revenues
may not be significant for the County.
• (d) Communication dated 12/19/12 from Wallace Rezentes, Jr.,
Director of Finance to Chair Dirk Apao, responding to o the
Commission's request for additional information as it relates to
Age Tax Exemption.
Chair Sterker asked if it is the Commission's desire not to pursue a
recommendation to Council to change the Age Tax Exemption. All
members present agreed.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive item CCC 2012 -15 (d).
Commissioner Yoshida moved to receive item
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 12
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
CCC 2012 -15 (d). Commissioner Takenouchi
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
CCC 2012 -16 Discussion on the Countsspecial counsel contracts and
expenditures to date. (On- going)
• (e) Memorandum dated 12/11/12 from Chair Dirk Apao to Alfred
Castillo, Jr., County Attorney, regarding arequest for a response as
_ _
it relates to special counsel contracts.
Chair Sterker called for a motion to receive item CCC 2012 -16 (e).
Commissioner Yoshida moved to receive item
CCC 2012 -16 (e). Commissioner Chaffin
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
County Attorney Alfred Castillo, Jr entered the meeting at 2:23 p.m.
Chair Sterker reiterated the Commission's question on what are the pros
and cons on hiring more staff for a Specialized Litigation Team in the
County Attorney's Office to reduce special counsel needs.
Mr. Castillo informed the Commission that he did not provide a written
response because his response would contain a whole gambit of
information in which he felt would be better received verbally. He stated
that it has always been a dream of his to have a Specialized Litigation
Team in the County Attorney's office to assist with settling controversies
or disputes brought before a court of law by the parties involved for a
resolution.
Mr. Castillo shared with the Commission that the actual salary for a
Deputy County Attorney is about $143,000 per year and when he was
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 13
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
hired for the position of the County Attorney, one of his priorities was to
look into the need for special outside counsel mainly because they would
not have to do the work themselves and fortunately he was able to bring in
litigators.
Mr. Castillo noted that once the amount of cases began to decrease the
need for litigators became less and the burden of litigation fell upon the
deputies. He explained that this created an added burden on the deputies
and that it affected their ability to service the various departments within
the County which included the County Council.
Mr. Castillo stated that the County Attorney's Office currently handles
nine (9) cases in the U.S. District Court; two (2) cases in the Hawaii
Supreme Court; one - hundred and one (10 1) Tax Appeal cases; eleven (11)
cases in the 5th Circuit Court, twenty -three (23) cases in District Court, and
several employment cases. Mr. Castillo stated that it is difficult to quantify
the amount of work that the County Attorney's Office does because other
than the Prosecutor's Office, who keeps their own statistics on the amount
of work that they do, the County Attorney's Office does not because he
feels that it serves no purpose. However, he assured the Commission that
the County Attorney's Office is hard at work handling many cases.
Mr. Castillo stated that his greatest challenge by far, is reviewing personnel
cost to determine how many hours are dedicated to this specific issue. In
dealing with this issue, he noted that he would need at least two (2)
litigators that would remain separate and apart from servicing the
departments. He also mentioned that there is a need for more training
when it comes to personnel issues in each department. Commissioner
Takenouchi asked what specific type of training is needed.
Mr. Castillo stated that more training should be made available at the
supervisory level because a supervisor needs to have the knowledge and
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 14
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
the willingness to follow the proper procedures when dealing with
personnel issues. He explained that when an employee files a harassment
complaint for example, the supervisor must take immediate and necessary
actions to ensure that all of the proper procedures are followed. In doing
so, this will not only protect the County but prevent a lawsuit from
happening. Mr. Castillo noted that every department needs to take a more
proactive approach in doing what is right because as the Attorney for the
County he knows very well how the situation can turn into something
unpleasant.
Commissioner Yoshida asked whether the training should be also offered
to the front line people to help them gain more knowledge when dealing
with personnel issues. Mr. Castillo said in looking at personnel cost that
area alone is a huge undertaking and that training is just one of those areas.
The "bottom line" is a supervisor needs to carry out their responsibilities to
the fullest and make sure that it is followed through.
Chair Sterker asked if the County Attorney's office has a backlog of cases
and what would be more of a backlog than is expected. Mr. Castillo stated
that in terms of backlog cases, one area that comes to mind is "collections"
however, one must keep in mind that prioritizing is first and foremost.
Chair Sterker stated that one of the concerns of the Commission is the cost
of hiring outside special counsel for certain cases. She asked whether there
was any consideration in hiring a local litigation team instead of going
elsewhere.
Mr. Castillo explained that the County Attorney's office has a list of
qualified litigators that they select from and depending on the
circumstances of each case, if it is determined that special outside counsel
is needed then the proper steps are taken to secure special outside counsel.
He also shared with the Commission his concern about bringing in special
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 15
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
counsel and the reasons why however, in certain cases it cannot be
avoided. The good thing about having a dedicated specialized litigation
team is that you have control over conflict of interest cases.
Chair Sterker asked whether a litigation team could do other types of work
rather than just strictly litigation. Mr. Castillo said yes, and another good
thing about having a litigation team is that they can be involved in doing
research and writing which is a great help for the deputies.
Commissioner Yoshida asked if spending $300,000 to hire two (2)
litigators would, in the long run, save the County more money in the fees
for special counsel and/or by the reduction of the actual payouts, i.e.
settlements. Mr. Castillo said that it would have to do with the fees
because there was a case in which there was a possibility that the litigation
team had to be separated from the rest of the County Attorneys due to a
conflict of interest.
Commissioner Yoshida stated that if the Cost Control Commission
proposed a recommendation to hire a two (2) member litigation team for
consideration to the administration, the Commission would have to know
that by doing so it would save the County money in the long run by either a
reduction in the fees, which would be easier to determine, because it would
be difficult to say whether the two (2) litigators actually brought the cost
down on what would be a paid out in a case.
Mr. Castillo stated that he would provide the Commission with information
on the actual cost and how it would benefit the County Attorney's Office,
stating that they would be able to provide better, more effective service to
the departments because it would alleviate the time spent on litigation that
could be used towards doing something else.
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 16
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Chair Sterker agreed and felt that having background information would be
useful to the Commission in making a meaningful recommendation. Mr.
Castillo acknowledged the Commission's request and stated that he would
do his best to provide the Commission with the information he has.
Commissioner Chaffin asked whether it would be appropriate for the
Commission to ask the County Attorney's Office for suggestions or a
recommendation on whether the department should maintain, increase or
reduce its staff to make way for more outside counsel, and which is the
least expensive.
Commissioner Yoshida said that she does not think the County can
completely eliminate special outside counsel because there are going to be
cases where special outside counsel is absolutely necessary. However, if
the County Attorney's Office is using special outside counsel specifically
for workload because there is not enough time for the attorneys to take on
additional cases, then there is a conflict or the conflict could be reduced by
having separate teams to easily offset the cost. Mr. Castillo said that his
office does not have the expertise to practice in Federal Court but is
looking into it. Commissioner Chaffin asked whether outside special
counsel have different firms with different expertise. Mr. Castillo said yes.
Commissioner Chaffin stated that he still wants either a suggestion or
recommendation that would help reduce the cost to the County. Mr.
Castillo stated that he would address the question in his next
communication to the Commission and would include the pros and cons of
having a specialized litigation team.
Mr. Castillo left the meeting at 2:55 p.m.
Announcements
Next meeting — February 11, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. at the Mo'ikeha Building,
Liquor Conference Room 3.
Cost Control Commission
Regular Meeting - Open Session
January 14, 2013
Page 17
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Adjournment
Commissioner Chaffin moved to adjourn the
meeting. Commissioner Takenouchi seconded
the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
The meeting adjourned at 2:56 p.m.
Submitted by:
Mercedes Youn, Staff Support Clerk
(X) Approved as circulated on February 11, 2013.
( ) Approved as amended. See minutes of meeting.
Reviewed and Approved by:
Sandi Sterker, Chair