HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013_0924_Minutes Open_APPROVED COUNTY OF KAUAI
Minutes of Meeting
OPEN SESSION
Approved as amended 10/22/13
Board/Committee: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Meeting Date I September 24, 2013
Location Mo'ikeha Building, Liquor Control Commission, Meeting Room Start of Meeting: 3:00 p.m. End of Meeting: 3:48 p.m.
3
Present Chair Cathy Adams; Vice-Chair John Low. Members: Lath Aranio; Richard Jose; Karen Matsumoto; Roy Morita
Also: Deputy County Attorney Marc Guyot; Personnel Services Manager Thomas Takatsuki; Boards & Commissions Office Staff
Support Clerk Barbara Davis; Administrative Aide Teresa Tamura; Personnel Services Manager Thomas Takatsuki; HR Specialist
Janine Rapozo
Excused Member: Gilbert Maerina
Absent
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Call To Chair Adams called the meeting to order at 3:00
Order/Roll Call p.m. with 6 members present
Approval of Open Session Minutes of August 27, 2013 Ms. Aranio moved to approve the minutes as
Minutes circulated. Mr. Morita seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Business CSC 2012-29 Implementation of the Human Resources Department
(Ongoing
b. Update from the Director of Personnel Services on the Transition Plan for
the Implementation of the Human Resources Department (On-going l
Mr. Takatsuki said they have completed the recruitment and examination
meetings with all the departments and agencies. The next step in that process
will be to update the departments on the classification and pay section. These
meetings are basically held with the department heads, deputies, and
appropriate staff There will be a meeting to recap the recruitment and exam
process to determine what needs to be followed up on based on the meetings
with the departments.
Chair Adams asked for the status on the files from the Prosecutor's Office and
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 2
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
the Water Department. Mr. Takatsuki advised the Commission that the
Department will be working on getting the HRIS back on track now that the
Deputy Director of Finance is back to work. With reference to the Water
Department, Ms. Rapozo met with David Craddick, Manager and their HR
Specialist Debra Peay who questioned what benefit they would gain by
bringing over the personnel files. Ms. Rapozo explained that was not the
reason they were meeting; the reason was how to get the files moved over.
Ms. Rapozo told Mr. Craddick and Ms. Peay that it was agreed they would
bring over the medical files; they will make minor files for their office, and
they will turn over the files. In turn, when there are new hires DPS will make
copies of their personnel records for the Water Department. Ms. Rapozo then
followed that meeting up with an email but that is not what came back from
the Manager. He said they would do the medical files, but the personnel files
were still in question and he still wants to know what they will gain from it.
Mr. Morita asked if the Commission could request a response to the memo sent
to the Board of Water. Chair Adams stated that Mr. Nishimura told her the
Board is putting together a response as a result of their last Board meeting.
She was under the impression that the Department was supposed to be turning
over their records, but she has not received that letter to know exactly what it
says. Mr. Takatsuki said they have not heard anything from the Board or Mr.
Craddick. Ms. Rapozo said her last email to the Manager warned him that the
official files are with DPS, and if they are not turned over he may be
jeopardizing any grievances with the union if they ask for the official
personnel files; there has been no response to that email.
Chair Adams suggested the Commission wait to see what response comes from
the Board of Water and from there determine what needs to be done. A. Low
agreed to wait for the response but not forever; if nothing is received by the
next meeting the Commission should write a letter of concern to the County
Attorney asking if we are following what we are supposed to follow legally.
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 3
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Attorney Guyot said this is more of an internal issue than a legal one. The
only significant legal part is what Ms. Rapozo stated about the official files
being held at DPS. Should there be a grievance, it puts the County in a very
precarious position as there can only be one official file. Perhaps the
Commission might want to consider a short follow up letter indicating that as
of this date you have not received any files, and ask for a response as soon as
possible. It is possible that this issue may have just missed the cut-off date for
the agenda. Mr. Low said that is why he suggested waiting one more meeting,
but then it has been a year. By not doing anything about this, Mr. Low asked
if the Commission was putting the County in any type of liability in terms of
those employees if something comes up and their files are not available.
Ms. Matsumoto said H.R.S. §76-28 gives the Director of Personnel Services
the authority over the forms regarding employment and the Director is
designating the department heads to be the appointing authority but that can be
taken away by the Director. Ms. Matsumoto said that is why she is not clear
why it is not a legal thing when the H.R.S. supports the Director on this by
law. She further asked why the department head is not complying with what
the Director has stated. If one department head does this what will stop the
rest of them from doing it in a different way.
Attorney Guyot said that is another legal aspect they could look at in that
context. It is an internal situation but there is that legal component. This
Commission's Chair has been in contact with the Boards's Chair. The Mayor
has been in contact with him so things are happening.
Ms. Aramo said if they do send another letter she suggests it be stronger with
"teeth" so it is a clear message; it is final and there is support behind it. The
going back and forth, dragging it out, and changing his mind without there
being consequences is disrespectful and unprofessional. If the H.R.S. can
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 4
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
support the Commission's action that is what she proposes they do when they
send the next letter. Asked who Mr. Craddick reports to the response was the
Board of Water and the Mayor to which Ms. Matsumoto added that the
Department is not autonomous, it is semi-autonomous. Attorney Guyot
advised the Commission that pursuant to H.R.S. §76-28, at the direction of the
Director of Personnel Services, the Commission is requesting these documents
which is within their power. Chair Adams said that would be part of the letter
that goes out if a response is not received. Mr. Morita concurred with his
fellow Commissioners, but said if they are going to wait the one month he
would like to request the Attorney's Office to research H.R.S. §76-28.
Attorney Guyot said it did not need researching; it is within the power of the
Director of Personnel Services to decide these things.
Mr. Jose wanted to clarify that the DPS was requesting the documents to assist
with doing their job. Mr. Takatsuki explained at one time DPS gave up the
files to the departments, which was allowable under the Statute. Now the sub-
committee's recommendation is that all personnel files and folders should
come back to the Department of Personnel Services where it is supposed to be
as part of the new HR. In 2012 a communication was sent requesting all
personnel files come back to DPS as the keeper of these files.
Chair Adams asked if a motion was needed to indicate the Commission would
wait for a response from the Board of Water before addressing this formally.
Mr. Low moved that if nothing is forthcoming, a
communication should be sent saying that the
Commission understands the Board of Water just
recently met and a response is expected by the
Commission's next meeting, otherwise further
action will be taken to bring DOW into
compliance. Mr. Morita seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 5
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Mr. Takatsuki said they are getting the files from the Prosecutor's Office, but it
is piecemeal. Ms. Matsumoto asked if the classification and pay meetings that
will be held with the departments will include the organization and
reorganizationpolicy and procedures. Mr. Takatsuki said they are looking at -I Deleted: of
it, but they have not gone into the particulars. DPS has been working on the
reorganization, but at the same time there are so many questions popping up in
regard to the actual position description, but it is being worked on.
CSC 2013-13 Update on Act 208 as relates to the County of Kauai Park
Security Officers (On-goingl
A. Takatsuki was in touch with the Director of Parks and Recreation who said
he said he was not planning to take any action at this time. Secondly, he stated
that he did request that the County Attorney's Office provide an interpretation,
which was verbal, but he wants something in writing. He also indicated he is
willing to appear before this Commission to explain his position and answer
any questions.
Ms. Aranio said the resorts have also been dealing with this, and it is their
understanding that the law is very explicit in the requirements of anyone who
performs functions or duties as described within the law as a security officer is
required to apply for the guard card. The State DCCA (Department of
Commerce and Consumer Affairs) is backlogged, and the resorts are still
waiting for cards and approvals, but the application process needed to be done
which includes the 8 hours of classroom training, the FBI fingerprinting and
then submitting the application directly to DCCA.
A. Takatsuki said they did meet with KCC to find out if there were any
classes being given that these individuals could attend. There were classes
scheduled in August that they could take so they can at least qualify; the rest is
the background checks that are required. Because of the time frame they were
not able to get into the first set of trainings, and have not done any of the
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 6
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
application work at this time.
A. Low asked if there had been any action or response from the federal
agencies that would be affected by this such as the military bases. Attorney
Guyot said they apparently have made no noise about this whatsoever. Ms.
Aramo said the resort industry was with the counties in this because they
already provide training. She said things were included in this law that they
have already been doing, in addition to their LPOs (Loss Prevention Officers)
being certified so they are able to provide the training for the resort teams.
Ms. Matsumoto said the County is only looking at the one department, but it is
affecting lots of businesses and people on Kauai. Attorney Guyot said the
Police Chief has been in favor of this from the beginning; he did not want to
exclude state, county or federal departments from it. There is some legal
concern that the DCCA, which oversees guards and private investigators,
protects the public from the misdeeds of businesses. Government is not
defined as a business so should they even be allowed to make rules for them.
Unfort unately all the other counties, state and federal seem to think so.
Another interesting aspect is the sanctions that can be given do not affect state,
county or federal agencies.
Chair Adam asked if this could increase the County's liability if someone
claimed its people were not properly trained, even though there are no fines or
penalties. Attorney Guyot said most likely not, but the County is responsible
for the action of its employees.
Mr. Morita said the Charter does not allow the Commissions to get involved in
the day to day operations. If this were a complaint or an appeal before the
Commission that could be discussed he would be more inclined to ask
questions. In this case, is the Commission getting involved in the day to day
operations of a department? Attorney Guyot said to a certain degree they are
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 7
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
discussing Parks and Recreation, which normally would be beyond the
Commission's reach, except for the fact that there is an implication on some of
the County employees even though there is not a current matter before this
Commission relating to such an incident.
Mr. Low said he understood the need for guard cards for both government and
private, but the functions are different and he is not convinced that one overall
training class or program covers everyone. Government should train their own
people and private industry should train their people because they are looking
at different issues. Attorney Guyot said that was right; it is a broadly written
rule and in most ways does not apply to our Park Security/Permit Officers.
Basically the majority of their job is to confirm that park permits are valid for
people who are camping and using our parks; otherwise it is just observe and
report. For their own protection and reporting purposes they have access to a
police radio and carry a badge so that starts to give people the impression that
is what they do.
Chair Adams said if there is no real clear understanding of a penalty and no
increased liability then the Parks and Rec Department has to make its own
decision and this Commission should not be involved.
Director's CSC 2013-15 a. Weekly Report Ending August 15, 2013
Report b. Weekly Report Ending August 23, 2013
c. Weekly Report Ending August 30, 2013
d. Weekly Report Ending September 6, 2013
Chair Adams asked for an explanation of what Rank for Rank stands for. Mr.
Takatsuki said that concept belongs to Firefighters Bargaining Unit 11 . Rank
for Rank applies to vacation in which only the same rank can take their place
on an overtime basis. Firefighters are on a 24 hour basis so a captain has to
replace a captain; a Firefighter III has to replace another Firefighter III.
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
September 24, 2013 Page 8
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Ms. Aranio asked about the exit interviews. Mr. Takatsuki said the County has
always had an exit interview process, but it has always been a hit and miss
situation. When a person was retiring or leaving the County by the time the
Department notified DPS or the payroll certification was received that person
most likely had already left. Now that Ms. Ponce works directly with the
departments and agencies, she is receiving that notification and can get the
employee to come in and complete the process. We are now catching 90% to
100% of the individuals that are leaving. Ms. Aranio moved to receive the Director's
Reports. Mr. Jose seconded the motion. Motion
carried 6:0
Mr. Morita asked to include an Executive
Session item for October to include the
evaluation, hiring and promotion of personnel
positions within DPS.
ES-01 2 Executive Session Minutes of August 27, 2013 Ms. Aranio moved to approve the minutes as
circulated. Mr. Low seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0
Announcements Next Meeting: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 At 3:00 p.m.
Adjournment Mr. Morita moved to adjourn the meeting at 3:48
p.m. Ms. Aranio seconded the motion. Motion
carried 6:0
Submitted by: Reviewed and Approved by:
Barbara Davis, Staff Support Clerk Catherine Adams, Chair
O Approved as is.
O Approved with amendments. See minutes of meeting.