Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0ct 4 KHPRC AGENDA MEETING OF THE KAUA'I COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2012 3:00 p.m. Lihu'e Civic Center, Moikeha Building Meeting Room 2A/2B 4444 Rice Street, Lihu'e, Kaua'i AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 6, 2012 MEETING MINUTES A. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS B . COMMUNICATIONS 1 . Letter (9/29/ 12) from Ron Agor, Architect, Agor Architecture, LLC requesting a courtesy presentation of the reconstruction plans of the Hanalei Pier Pavilion to the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission. C . UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 . Letter (6/ 19/12) from Barbara Shideler, AIA, Mason Architects, Inc . requesting input on the Pre-final Design Guidelines for the Historic Kokee, Halpmanu and Puu ka Pele Camp Lots (Kokee and Waimea Canyon Recreation Residences Historic District) = State of Hawai 'i, Division of State Parks. 2, Certified Local Government (CLG) Status a. Presentation by Mike Gushard, Architectural Historian/CLG Program Coordinator, State Historic Preservation Division. b. Appointment of investigative committee members and discussion to scope tasks for an investigative committee to identify properties for nomination to the State and National Register of Historic Places. Once formed and the tasks completed, the investigative committee will present its findings to the Commission in a duly noticed meeting for decision-making. October 4, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Agenda Page 2 D. NEW BUSINESS 1 . Letter (9/12/12) from Glenn. T. Kimura, President, Kimura International, Inc. requesting input/consultation in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 on the Lydgate Park to Kapa` a Bike/Pedestrian Path (Phases C&D), Waipouli, Kawaihau District, Kauai, TMK: [4] 4-3 -001 , 002, and 007 : various = County of Kauai, Department of Public Works. 2. Appointment of investigative committee members and discussion to scope tasks for an investigate committee to identify potential amendments to Article 2;5 , Chapter 8 of the Kauai County Code, 1987 as amended, including to but not limited to changing the name of the Commission and clarifying the role of the Commission. Once formed and the tasks completed, the investigative committee will present its findings to the Commission in a duly noticed meeting for decision- making. E. SELECTION OF NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS ( 11/ 1 /2012) F . ADJOURNMENT EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Commission may go into an executive session on an agenda item for one of the permitted purposes listed in Section 92-5(a) Hawaii Revised Statutes ("H.R.S."), without noticing the executive session on the agenda where the executive session was not anticipated in advance. HRS Section 92-7(a). The executive session may only be held, however, upon an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members present, which must also be the majority of the members to which the board is entitled. HRS Section 924. The reason for holding the executive session shall be publicly announced. Note: Special accommodations and sign language interpreters are available uj)on request five (5) days prior to the meeting date, to the County Planning Department, 4444 Rice Street, Suite 473, Lihue, Hawaii 96766. Telephone: 2414054. KAUAI COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION Lihue Civic Center, Moikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A/2B MINUTES A regular meeting of the Kauai County Historic Preservation Commission (KHPRC) was held on August 2, 2012 in the Lihue Civic Center, Moikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A/2B . The following Commissioners were present: Kuuul.eialoha Santos, Chairperson, Pat Griffin, Vice Chairperson, Danita Aiu, Stephen Long, Patsy Sheehan, and Randy Wichman. The following Commissioner(s) were absent: Jane Gray and David Helder. Commissioner Stephen Long was sworn in before the meeting was called to order. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Santos called the meeting to order at 3 : 00 p.m. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA The agenda was approved as circulated. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES The Minutes of the August 2, 2012 meeting were approved as circulated. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS Commissioner Griffin reported that the draft of the State Historic Preservation Division Plan is out and comments are due by September 17"'. Commissioners can go htt p://hawaiihistoricpreservation.com to review the document online. Ms. Griffin reported that she appreciated getting the meeting agenda packet via email and requested that copies of the recommendation memoranda be provided at the following meeting. COMMUNICATIONS There were no communications. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 2 UNIFINISHED BUSINESS Re: Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant Update Chair: Now we are on the CLG status. So Myles do you want to give an update? Mr. Hironaka: Yes as Patsy was saying Mike Gushard who we really was hoping was going to be here today can't. He is in attending the meeting in Maui. So hopefully he comes by at our next meeting. The importance of that, I have some good news and some potentially bad news for the Commission. We did receive in the mail the grant agreement that we secured the $50,000 for the CLG grant. We got that from the state. So we are forwarding that through our process to get it executed. The bad news on that is I thought that we would have up until 2014 to do the project cause it's usually a two year period. Mr. Wichman: What' s the deadline? Mr. Hironaka: September 2013 which is less than a year away. Again it' s going to be another one of those races to the finish. Ms. Aiu: To finish the project? Not encumber? Mr. Hironaka: No to finish the project. Mr. Wichman: And the final report written by September. Chair: Did you talk to Mike about that? Mr. Hironaka: I talked to the Assistant Administrator, Randolph Lee who is really a nice person and he was very accommodating. When I received the grant and I saw that the deadline was September 2013 1 kind of freaked out, So I called and asked if we could extend that and unfortunately that's when, so I misunderstood when they fiscal year 2012 it is actually going from 2011 to 2013 . Not 2012 to 2014 . So we are in that situation. So unfortunately we missed the annual publication for our professional services. So I did speak with Ernest Barreira and we can submit an individual request for professional services to get a consultant on board. So that is something I am working with him and we will get the publication out as soon as possible. Unless of course we want to go a different route which is why I was hoping that Mike Gushard would be here to speak to this commission, I think he was mentioning that. Mr. Wickman; To open up parameters for processing . . . Mr. Hironaka: He mentioned to you that he had some ideas about how to the project. September 6, 2012 IC.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 3 Mr. Wichman: There is a quick way of allocating the funds to it and getting through. Mr. Hironaka: Of that $47,000 is for the inventory itself. $3 ,000 is set aside for training which is no problem. Training shouldn't be an issue for us. We should be able to get that done well before the September deadline. Ms. Sheehan: So what do you do with this grant? You got the grant agreement and now what happens? The County has it and then where does it go? Mr. Hironaka: What we need to do is Mr. Jung: I have it now to review. Mr. Hironaka: So we need to procure that. Have our people on our side execute the document and then send it back to the State but I don't have to wait. I can start with the publication for the professional services. Now this is very broad and I don' t know if you want to look at this and if you have any comments we can circulate what we would be sending to the Purchasing Division. They will publish this and then the consultants will be giving us their resumes. So if you wanted to . . . Ms. Aiu: I have to read it but I will call you. Ms. Sheehan: Do you have a problem about not signing it? I mean you have it in your hands now but is it just protocol? Mr. Jung: Well we have to sign all contracts. Ms. Sheehan: Yes but it' s not going to take a month or two? Mr. Jun : No, no I have it right here. I just have to go log it in. We have signed the same gne before I just got to make sure everything is lined up correct. So it will probably get out of our office tomorrow. Mr. Aiu: And then Myles we just call you if we have any comments. Mr. Hironaka: Yes so it's very general. It' s just asking if, giving the scope of it which is doing the inventory and then asking. . , the professional services is really specific in that you have to look at specific professional. Either architect or community planning but I think in parenthesis I have indicated that they have to have some experience with historic review of buildings and structures and so forth. So that' s kind of like in that, what we call an RFQ. So as soon as I can get this out to Ernest Barreira he can then publish that and then we can. The other stuff is just standard stuff. It's just the front page. September G, 2012 K.I-I.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 4 Ms . Aiu: On the description of the person that we want did you put that they should have capability of taking photographs. I think that is kind of important. We want nice photographs. With the cameras now days anybody can but I just want to put it in. Ms. Sheehan, You have $47,000 and you say there is a deadline does that mean the person just doesn't work by the hour. The faster they do it the better it is for them. I don't know if $47,000 is a lot or not for this kind of project. Mr. Hironaka: It' s not going to, as I indicated in the past . . . Mr. Wichman: The intended amount for that dollar amount in bringing our inventory up it will get it going. Chair: And then we can always apply next year again. Mr. Hironaka: Well I guess we would wait two years. Well it would be next year already actually. Chair: We apply next year again for another $50,000. Mr. Hironaka: Now what I am doing is I am setting this in motion but it doesn't necessarily mean that we have to go through with this round. But if I don' t do this you know, I am saying we are already behind. So I am setting this in motion but when we do meet with Mike from State Historic Preservation Division and he has some better ideas and process on how we can do the inventory that is different from this . That is fine. Chair: Alright. Re: Presentation by Mike Gushard, Architectural Historian/CLG Program Coordinator, State Historic Preservation Division. Mr. Mike Gushard was unable to attend this meeting as such this matter was deferred to the October 4, 2012 KHPRC meeting. Re: Discussion to scope tasks for an investigative committee to identify properties for nomination to the State and National Register of Historic Places. Once formed and tasked completed, the investigative committee will present its findings to the Commission in a duly noticed meeting for decision-making. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page S NEW BUSINESS Letter (7/27/12) from David Shideler, Cultural Surveys Hawaii requesting for consultation regarding a draft Presentation Plan for Pooku Heiau State Site #500 30-03439, Hanalei Ahupuaa, Halelea District, Kauai Island, TMK: (4)5-3-0Q:016. Chair: Letter from David Shidelei, Cultural Surveys Hawaii requesting for consulation regarding a draft presentation plan for Pooku Heiau, State Site #50-30-03- 139, Hanalei Ahupuaa, Halelea District, Kauai Island, TMK: 4-5-3 -00-016 . Come on up. Mr. Wichman: Madame Chair I need to recuse myself from this subject matter because I have been working on the project a while now. Chair: Ok. Mr. Jiro Fields: I am Jim Fields. I am the landowner. David Shideler is not here today but Nancy is here to report. (Inaudible). I brought along helpful summaries of the preservati plan. It' s bullet points, the preservation plan is a little intense of a document. Chair: Fabulous. Mr. Field: And also I brought along somewhere here in my pile the (inaudible) of our inventory survey (inaudible) . What would be best? I want to be respectful of your time. I heard there is actually a plane commitment. I can do this. I am not Bill Clinton. I cannot be spell binding for 48 minutes. I can actually be spell binding for ten minutes. But I am happy to either go through tht summary, a summary of the summary, or longer. It s really what is most helpful to you I am happy to do or I can just start digging in and you can look through the summary. Whatever the best way to help you. Chair: I think it was the ten minute version and then if we have more questions. Mr. Field: Ok we will use this summary as (inaudible). The first page of the summary, I am not sure if you all know where the heiau is . It' s kind of been ignored for the last 100 years. So it's just east of Princeville about 1 ,000 feet of Kuhi ` d Highway on Kapaka Street. Kapaka Street is where Church of the Pacific is and where the old Princeville stables are. If you go up that street it is very, very close to the highway. The property that I ov4m starts at the corner of I apaka and Kizhi ` o highway and runs up the canyon up past the water tower. In some places it's very thin and in some places its fat and the beginning of it is the heiau area. There is also along Kuhi` d Highway there used to be, where Princeville had its nursery there right along the highway. So that' s the area. What we are trying to do in the simplest is to restore and protect the heiau and it seems like the last 100 years at least from what I can tell is that it I neglected. Neglected it is probably worst. You can go to the heiau and I invite you to do so but the top of the heiau is flat you wouldn't even know that you are looking down on Hanalei Valley. The hau is so thick. The Christmas September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 6 berry and strawberry guava is three feet high. It is just a sea of invasive growth. The other thing that is more sad about that is there is some remaining stone work from the terrace but the hau has pushed into the work and is pushing all the stones left down the hill. So now is very, very good time to fist clear that area and start. There has never been much there. It seems like the archeological report dates back early in the last century say that there was not a lot of stone work but there is some and it can be preserved and we need to get on it. So preserve and protect. Protect I go by there almost every day. It's just a hill and there it is. It's on the map and then you can find everything like kids going up with a case of beer to tourists pulling up on their bikes saying where is the heiau. What can we see and my view I am talking to lots and lots of folks. Folks wondering up there and sitting on top the heiau isn't an appropriate use of an important cultural resource. So at this point preserve and protect. What we have proposed and we described in the archeological inventory survey is to take the whole side of this hill which is about two acres and really that is the census here. It is not clear completely where the structures might have been but if you say well let' s just take the whole two acres and that's the most sensitive. Then we take the five acres around so that it that it sort of slopes around it and that seven acres we would create as a preserve. We would take that and the last two years that we have been working on creating what is a CPR unit and dividing it. We take the whole, we are going to CPR out this area and create a separate property interest which is the preserve the seven acres and I am proposing to take that and transfer ownership of that in perpetuity to a new charitable organization. And that organization would be dedicated solely to managing this and having stewardship for this . I am not part of that organization. I want that to be run by community folks and a number of people have stepped up to do this and they would like to be involved in restoring and managing this resource. My involvement, I am happy to support it and go through some of the things to help support it but it' s really not appropriate. I really don't have that sensitivity that' s appropriate and so we have got some very good folks who raised their hand. So its seven acres and then we would contribute those seven acres ownership of that. Their goals would be to initially clear that anq get the invasives. Clear the area. Start planting the natives around the buffer and on the summit. We can go through them, maybe I will skip page four here if you go to page seven, it' s right after page six it doesn't have a number on it so it' s not helpful but it' s sort of a schematic of what we plan to do . It' s called the heiau preserve landscape plan but it' s much more than that. The center of that is the summit the stuff with the hatching. This is on the summary book, page seven. It doesn't have a page number on it but it's after page six which does. The little dots around on the side are what we call the heiau preserve . The dots around the outside are where we are proposing to plant the hala barrier all the way around to create a true preserve area cause we need to get control over the property. So we are proposing a hala barrier all the way around then in the center where you see the hatching that' s the two acre summit. That' s the area we are proposing to clear. There is a little path running up to Kapaka Street, we want to insure a safe clean path up to the Kapaka to the summit. September G, 2012 K.II.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 7 We are proposing to put in a very small parking lot. This is not to be a tourist attraction. This is for people coming to work here can park their car safely and not leave them on Kapaka Street which may not be the best idea. We have a legal right to do that anyway. So we are putting a chemical/portable restroom. I understand it' s not appropriate to use a heiau as a restroom which makes sense to me. So we will use a portable restroom and a small plant shade house so that we can start growing our own native species there and then finally a meeting hale about a thousand square feet so that people can meet and plan what they are doing on the site. So we will enclose the site. Put some facilities so that people can park and work. Keep tools there and that's the basis of the start of the preserve. The other things that I think you might get a look at, if you go to the picture on page four, no number but it' s after three. There is a picture there and you can see the aerial photograph from 2409 and tell what this looks like. The center red is actually the summit and that's the two acres and the dotted red/black are the boarder of the preserve and you can see how that works . We have really used the roads as the boundaries of the preserve. Kapaka Street the big nursery road That is in there and there is a road on the valley side as well sort of defining that and creating natural boundaries and we are going to plan hala around it. The next sort of question for us is really access and that is something that is and use and I think the best description of what they are proposing is a cultural preserve. This shouldn' t be a tourist attraction and I don't think we have the resources to man a tourist attraction. Instead it should be a preserve which is dedicated to study and practice Hawaiian traditions that are associated in small groups. That seems to make sense. Once we have cleared the top people can be brought out. Whether it' s hula or the appropriate activities can be done in there and that would be an administered by the board. One of the things that was brought up was should one group be the owner of the property. I think answer we came to was no . It should be owned by the community and used by all groups who have a legitimate use for it and hopefully the people we identify are the kind who have the judgment to sort our appropriate uses from inappropriate uses. We have, on page 11 , some things we certainly don't want done here. We don't want dwellings. We don't want stays. I shouldn't be a camp ground. We don't want alcohol or drugs used on the premises. No large open fires and weapons. These are silly things that are obvious but Historic Preservation Division wants these things laid out as to what' s going on. So we have tried to lay a list of things that are prohibited from the site. We have also laid out some parameters for use and access and that' s on page 12. Where our thinking is (inaudible) during the day time hours but to a limited amount of people. It can't be freely because everybody we want control. I think once we clear that top if we made it freely open and just left the gates open I think we would have hundreds of people and I think that was not really what we wanted. We don't want people wandering up there unescorted on the heiau. So the theory here is the control aspect. Have it fenced in and have appropriate numbers and people in groups to be allowed in during daytime hours. There will be evening sessions and opportunities for bigger events quarterly. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 8 So that' s the quick of it. To set up the seven-acre preserve. Close it so it is protected to create . a (inaudible) not only owned by the community but administer it and to keep access control such as an appropriate cultural preserve. I am there to support it but in a sense my involvement is early ended. It should be the community's to take and restore and not mine. I don't see how it is appropriate for me owning a heiau. I don't know if that get' s everything but at least that the eight or nine minute version. Ms. Sheehan: I think it is wonderful gesture on your part and more than that you are putting your action in order to develop the other side. How would you fund this? Mr. Field: There is three parts to fund it. Initially I have committed to doing the development of the parking lot and the other part planting hala and the clearing so that we will get off the ground and it would be there . We are going to put residences, just five, along that arep and in the CPR documents we put a charge, a CPR fee of $ 15 ,000 a year aggregate to go to support. That doesn't go to support everything but that' s a good start and I told people who are better at this than I am that this is a great opportunity for grantsmanship and grants will be obtainable especially once you can show here is you got it cleared and you have got parking. We really got a start to something to fund . The bottom line it's just a huge amount labor to clear all this acreage. There are old photos. It was a beautiful clear plain with views out over the bay. Not anymore. It' s a huge knot of hau, it's a shame. Ms. Sheehan: Do you propose bathrooms at all? Mr. Field: Yes we thought we should have some kind of portable toilets down by the parking lot that the servicer can come in. I have been informed that it's just not the right idea to be using the heiau as a restroom. And I wouldn't do it where I worship so I assume that' s acceptable. Ms. Sheehan: So it will be down by the parking lot? Mr. Field: Yes. We are going to keep all that stuff, the tool shed by the street so that it' s easily accessible and the summit as pristine as we can. Ms. Aiu: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to look at this. I read this whole thing. I read portions several times that I was a little confused about. Nancy you never took me here. Nancy and I have been everywhere. I don' t know this spot at all and the reason I don' t know it too is probably cause it' s so over grown that I have no idea in passing it. So it's wonderful that you are going to clean it up and you are going to make it accessible. We just cleaned our family heiau down in Hauula and I know you said and I read in here and was wondering ok what is left cause when we started we only found a few rocks yea. And then as we cleared each weekend wow, wow, wow, and then things that we couldn't recognize. So things will come up. Things will happen. The five acre parcel is really a lot cause I am a Wailua person and we don't have (inaudible) . I pass that heiau everyday and maybe I have three feet from the road to the heiau. So very generous offer that you are doing. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 9 Like Pat my only concern and then I saw your name was here and this happens in Wailua you know getting people to kokua and I am guilty as charged too cause I don't get out there with the weed whacker and do things but I think that' s going to be your problem. The other thing I see is ownership and liability. Those things go together. I don't know how you are going to work that out cause we had tried with our heiau to cut it out from our acreage cause there is 23 heirs so we have to sell. Cut it out from our acreage and try different entities to give it to and grant it to like how you folks want to do. We were not able to find an entity to take that responsibility and I can well understand that, So that's the only thing that I see. Good job Nancy on this and what was worked on. And thank. you for doing this. Mr. Field: Can I show you one thing. Ms. Aiu: Yes. Mr. Field : Here is a place that has been dragged for farming. People have been down there. Nancy and Cultural Surveys people were just walking along kicking over leaves . So I think you are absolutely right. When we get in there and start doing what we are supposed to be. doing who knows what we will find. This was just sitting on the ground and there are people all over that place. You know there is hope that we might be pleasantly surprised. As to insurance that is part of the reason for the new entity and I think we will be able to get an insurance policy for the new entity as long, insurers are concerned about open gates. As long as we keep it as a cultural preserve with limitation and incorporate signs and don't come near here unless you are permitted in. I think that will help us . I can' t guarantee it but they have said that they will give us a policy which is important. For the moment it' s being insured. So they are insuring it now and we have no provisions. Why won't you insure it for if I protect it, fence it. So I am hoping (inaudible). Ms. Aiu: Best wishes. Thank you. Ms. McMahon: I guess Danita you didn' t go on my heiau survey around the island during one of the archeology weeks many, many year ago. We actually took a bus load of people. We took about 30 people up to several sites from Kapinao all the way down to the end of the road. So I guess you must have missed out on that. Sorry about that. So but I will gladly take you up there if you would like to go . Ms. Aiu: I probably will. Ms. McMahon: It' s a very interesting site to go look at, to read the literature on it and this was sort of a Jim O ' Conner and I get called in to help out the situation with Jim Fields and I wanted him to come. I asked him to come today to present to you cause I think it' s in like 20 something years sitting on this board hearing from the applicant themselves on what they are envisioning is probably the most important thing than talking to a bunch of consultants that give out abstract ideas of what happened. So I wanted you to hear that. I think what we have been to a lot of people and ideas it' s been a two year process trying to do the right thing for this site. It opened up a bigger eye to me that there is a lot of sites like this. We September G> 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 10 kind of went back to this idea that LaFrance had started with burial treatment in Walpouli CPR or actually that's a subdivision in this case the parcel out so that it doesn't get entwined with legal issues if the project goes bankrupt. It' s going to have a separate ownership . It will be a separate parcel and therefore how we deal with that is to get a board together to manage that and that they can decide which groups they want to help clean the site and work because there may be a lot of groups and could decide which groups outweigh one another and some may not do what we think they should so we got this board to kind of do that idea. So that was the intent. So it' s probably the first really interesting curatorship to do it this way a little different and hopefully this idea will work. I think what LaFrance's idea of having a separate parcel to do sites and buffers is the first step in that process and so you know I would like to make sure this project sort of moves on so that the rest of it can work. So we came to you for comments because it's part of SHPD' s rules actually to get comments from community groups and that' s what we are after. So if you could provide comments to us. We could revise the plan or add to the plan if we need to . Ms. Grifflin: (Inaudible). Ms. McMahan: It was identified and Randy has been doing some research on some of the oral traditions that shows up in the chants and things like that and some other place names for it. Bennet talks about: it. He has driven to summit. There is also trig station up there and we have taken some of the rocks and reformed that. Kikuchi came out in the 70s when Princeville was very operational. One of the things we went back to was Kapaka Road and how its place was put in there because the landlord actually wanted it to be paved. Fortunately it makes a buffer on that side. You can't make it a bigger buffer because you have a road there for the Princeville Subdivision and that was to pass (inaudible). So that' s how Kapaka Road was set up. As far as archeology Kikuchi went out there several times to nursery itself and the church area. It's listed as a earthen heiau on an earthen terrace. I do see some of the terraces. Aid then on the Hanalei side you actually have, where there is a jeep trail now it used to be a horse trail, there is rock walls and rock placements and the (inaudible). And that' s what the rocks are kind of there for because it is pretty hot and dry on the other side but again we changed the runoff and the way things flow because you have the road I there and the development. So I can't tell you what it looked like. I can try to recreate some kind of land structure. So I think there is an importance to that there. And pretty much Bennet' s survey was the two acre and then Kikuchi was there for the road and also there used to be the fake tree cell tower that was actually blocking the view. Mr. Field: Putting a cell tower next to a heiau. It was the wofst fake tree I have ever seen. It' s gone now. September G, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 11 Ms. McMahon: So it is now off and out of the view plane. And so part of that was to try to get that taken care of. Once it' s clear the view plane should (inaudible). So that' s sort of the early onset. We haven't done a lot of excavation (inaudible). Chair: Anyone else? Mr. Long: I have a general question and a comment. Nancy what' s the historical practices on the heiau? What do they do there historically? Ms. McMahon: Hopefully we are not going to do . . . it' s something very traditional but L . . Mr. Long: I'm just curious. Ms. McMahon: I think more cultural activity for gathering if they are gathering. Mr. Long : No historically what did the Hawaiians use this particular heiau for? Did it have special significance? Mr. Wichman: I can answer that later for you. Mr. Long: Ok and my comment is I heard you mentioned and I see in the drawing the toilets and storage at the end of the parking lots . I heard you mention portable toilets which in themselves aren't very aesthetic and one question could a permanent toilet facility with a small septic system be installed on the property as opposed to portable toilets? Mr. Field: I have no problem. We originally thought about this . Nancy' s concern is once you start digging SHPD we go through a whole other process of permits from SHPD and that' s something we should probably work towards but in the mean time we use the portable. What I was thinking for the portables we would actually build a little hale around it so at least aesthetically, they are really awful, ultimately that would be great we were just worried that the digging was going to create a whole nest of issues with SHPD . Mr. Long: With the digging you are creating a parking lot. That's more surface. The Hale. Mr, Field: We would have to have very limited four posts basically. I mean you are right. It' s just a question of degree. Mr. Long: That' s just a question. I Mean how can you provide a slightly aesthetic toilet facilities. Ms. McMahon: The area that we are actually looking at. The parking lot actually several people have used, besides the Princeville nursery, Kauai Nursery had actually been placing dirt fill on top of that area already and sort of graded that area out without permits or anything anyway. So it's pretty much darn flat and nothing is growing on there we thought it would be fairly easy to keep it sort of the gravely look to it and not do anything to make run off an issue there. September G, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 12 Mr. Field: But in the long run to be really nice to have nice facilities as apposed to . I have got so many battles that I am fighting with this I didn't want to fight another one. Mr. Long: Yes I understand. Mr. Field: But it would be great. Once we get this set up I think then we can say what' s the plan for this . We can get the archeology done appropriately and do its Mr. Long : I have a further comment. Regardless of whether they are portable or permanent or portable with a screen around it, my thought is on an architectural aesthetic basis is you drive by there and you enter into a parking lot you have a perimeter. So it might be nice not to be looking at the toilet facilities/storage and be driving into the parking lot and they form a visual barrier to the meeting hale. That might be nice to be exposed when you look through the parking lot and its there with the services and the toilet more off to the side. Mr. Field : That's absolutely right. We can set it (inaudible). Ms. McMahon: There is port-a-potties that I was involved in that we put on Kaho` olawe. They didn't even dig into the ground at all whatsoever. They are just pretty darn expensive. So it just depends on the budget and that really makes the whole business and how you set it up. Chair: Any other comments? Ms. Sheehan: One other question. Do you envision the hala being a barrier and not putting up a fence or are you going to do both? Mr. Field: I starting with a fence. Then everybody said. you are going to do a what? And so the hala was the substitute for the fence. It may be in the short run. We will only put up a fence if we need to . I guarantee when we take the hau off the top people are going to be flocking up there. You can see it from all around. You know it' s going to be beautiful. So we are going to need containments. We may need to put a temporary fence until the hala gets out. That judgment is to are we doing something inappropriate and I will go to my experts. Ms. Sheehan: Yes I think with all the dogs and cats and different things that it would be really until you can monitor this cause this is this is a huge project for even some able bodied people here. It' s going to take a lot of monitoring and being in the valley I certainly don't expect it to be lit up or anything like that. There is going to be need for some electricity. There is going to be a need for you know someone who comes up there at night until the rules are set and you have a plan. But I think it' s wonderful. I can't answer everything completely but we won't let you go without bringing you back and reminding you. Mr. Field: We do also have a couple members of the board who have a lot sway with the younger folks in the community. And they have assured me that when they put the word out that you are not to go, that that' s now where you bring your date. Then that will be, most will honor that. You September G, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 13 are right. We can only do so much. The expression this is perfect as the enemy of the good, and I don't want that to be the case here cause I think we can get this done. Ms. Sheehan: I think your intentions are wonderful and I wish you luck. Chair: Alright. I think we are good. Thank you very much. Do we need a motion? Mr. Wichman: Pre-consult? Oh good. Chair: Yes. Thank you very much. Tom's Place (Gwendolyn Hamabata) TMK: 1-941 :08 3645 Hanapepe Road, Hanapepe, Kauai Proposed demolition. Chair: Next on the agenda, Tom' s Place, Gwendolyn Hamabata, TMK: 1 -9A I : 08, 3645 Hanapepe Road, Hanapepe Kauai, proposed demolition. I guess no one is here for that today. I have been to this. It is so bad. It is terrible. It' s really scary. Things are constantly falling down from the ceiling. It's pretty bad. It's all open. So they just have caution tape around the front. It' s right where you turn to go into Hanapepe Valley, it' s right on the comer and the river house is right across it. They redid the river house. Mr. Hironaka: Just for the, I thought someone would be present today but apparently they couldn't make it I suppose but in your packet you do have a letter from the Department of Public Works where they have indicated that the owner of this property was deemed to be an unsafe building. Their instructions is either to come in and apply for demolition of it or to renovate the building. What we have received from the applicant or the owner of the property is a building permit and zoning permit to demolish. I guess also, I thought, in speaking with the representative, I thought they mentioned that they did do some of the HABS type of documentation and photos but I think they mistook it for this hazardous material survey which they submitted. We have instructed them to contact the State Historic Preservation Division also on this. I don't think they received anything from SHPD. So that's all that we know at this time. Mr. Wichman: Are there any basements in this house? Underground storage. You know these older houses sometimes that was part of it. No tanks? They have never used underground tanks in this scepter? Chair: It' s built a little bit high off the ground. Not really high but this high off the ground and it's built like right into the mountain. Mr. Wichman: It's such a prominent corner of that river as you come off that bridge. I understand the demolition aspect of it. Just for a second my mind jumped ahead after the fact it is September G, 2012 K.I1.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 14 demoed what goes back in there. How would we, that look of that comer kind of forces certain parameters or maybe I am not sure the long term. Mr. Hironaka: And this is on the State Register of Historic Places. Ms. Sheehan: I don't think it' s savable. Mr. Wichrnan: No I don't think so either but then it comes down to adaptive reuse. What can be reused if any of it like all the little door knobs and hinges and. things can be recycled back into the community. So in one sense I know it adds another layer of things but some of the hardware within the house itself would be of interest to certain people. To make an effort to salvage the hardware, do the best you can and this is just you know. There must be little bits and pieces in there that could be either reused or recycled. Right now at this point it is not a recommendations for HABS . So that's not on the table as far as a final documentation for the record of this structure. But however let's keep that open. Ms . Griffin: Looking at the Spencer Mason, that' s 18 years ago and it was already in very poor condition as it states but I do believe that it is appropriate to ask a history and survey even though at this stage taking interior photos may be too late for that. But the building does have a history. It' s 81 years old and the development of Hanapepe, the west side, and the east side of the river were developed very differently and by different ethnic groups and what this building, which was a commercial store, did and how it was used and it' s influence on the town is something that is worth documenting and I don't think that it' s unreasonable given that it would be demolished to have that requirement as determining factor given that even it were in great shop we could not stop the demolition legally. So the question is how do we as a preservation review commission, how do we gather what information we can and for me that is part of our portfolio I think that that is what we can ask is a document about the life of this building and it' s relationship to community around it. Ms. Sheehan: From the owners? Ms. Griffin: Yes. Mr. Wichman: Which would be kept at Hanapepe Library. Ms. Griffin: All the usual. The Kauai Museum, the Historical Society, the Libraries, certainly it would be archived and SHPD as well. Mr. Wichman: It shows up in the SOS survey, Save Our Sights that was done in the 70s ended up in many file cabinets full of the SOS survey. So probably within the Hanapepe core being in the SOS survey a lot of this is there already. So it could be from just that point. No oral histories have really been done like Koloa. I know the overall histories were done in the 60s in Koloa but I don't know if Hanapepe has done an oral history project that included in soope of the core of it. September G, 2012 K.I•I.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 15 Ms , Griffin: Well it' s on the State Historic Register. So there is already a body of information to start with. I think if it were my task I would start there and build from that document. Ms. Sheehan: Want to motion? Ms . Griffin: Sure. Chair: Please. Ms . Griffin: I move that the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission recommends that before demolition that a document be prepared discussing the history of the site and the use of the building and its relationship to the community. That elements that are still salvageable within the building be recycled and that all documentation be archived with the Planning Department, Historical Society, Kauai Museum, and appropriate libraries. Chair: Can I get a. . . Mr. Wichman: I will second that. Mr. Chair: All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote.) All right. Re: Discussion about potential amendments to Article 25, including but not limited to changing the name of the commission and the addition of a tenth non-voting student commissioner. Chair: Discussion about potential amendments to Article 25 , including but not limited to changing the name of the commission and the addition of a tenth non-voting student commissioner. I brought this up at the last commission meeting and I think that it would be a good thing to have a student commissioner sit on the commission and not be a voting member. This student can do a lot of the research we need to do if we are going to start adding things to the register. So we would go to the school . . . Mr. Jung: I think what I kind of want before I start drafting something up for you guys and for Mike to look at I wanted to see if you wanted a high school student or a college. Chair: High school . I would like a high school student. Mr. Wichman: We can't do KCC? Chair: We could but. . . Mr. Wichman: They are a little bit more mature I guess and able to have the research aspects we are asking them to research. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 16 Chair: The only reason why I wanted a high school student is because I think that it is extremely important to get our youth involved in our community and I think that college students, I think, that if you reach a student before they graduate they have a better understanding of you know our culture and our history and all of that kind of stuff. So that's the only reason I wanted to stick it with the high school student and I don't think high school students are that bad. I mean if you get somebody between the ages, you could open it from ages like 16 to 18 . You know that age. Mr. Wichman: How about . . . Ms. Sheehan: I think you. might want to get somebody that can drive and somebody that can just come and go on their own. I mean there is a little bit of you know the freshman and the sophomores you know. Chair: 16 to 18 . Ms. Sheehan: I mean you have to also a high school person who is looking at staying here and going to KCC . So I just don't think even for me you can learn much in one year. You know hopefully you can get them for like two years and they want to come back and they want to be interested but it just takes time to learn what you need to learn because we only meet once a month. You know 'it' s not, I don't think, it would cut into their grades or anything but I also think you want to get them interested and you want them to stay interested not just do something and then go to the mainland and then go to school. I feel like if there are people, you know high school level, who really want to know that they are going to stay here they might be more interested in making that transition from high school to college. You know you lose them. Mr. Wichman: There are increments you can take to get to that level. One would be, just as an example, the commission has two open seats for guests at which the commission invites from the high schools, colleges, and different businesses and things to sit with the commission but in these two guests seats and for the year 2013 we have two guest seats in which we are' asking and then at the end of 2013 we review the people who attended and then the nature of the enthusiasm and then at that point we can take the next step from there. Before we actually put pen to paper I was just wondering just within a simple aspect of just two guest seats we see what 213 brings on that and then take it up the next. Invite all the high schools and the teachers . There is a little bit that goes out to the high schools to generate the first level of interest and see what comes out of it. Ms. Sheehan: I think you have to do a job description but really tell them what we do . Be really specific cause I am not sure that you can ask, high school kids unless they are doing so already to do too much research and we only meet once a month. I feel like it takes a long time at once a month to get you hooked. Mr. Wichman: But at that age it's good to be exposed to some of the community responsibilities, we all have to assume when we get rich and happy. And that we all owe community service in our lifetimes and the fact that even though at 18 they are not ready to take on that kuleana but maybe 25 or 30. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 17 Chair: It is a requirement now for high school students to do community service. They have to do so many hours of community service. I know Island School is 100 hours of community services to graduate high school. So this could be hard and whatever research they do could be considered within their community service. So I mean it' s up to you guys. It' s just my suggestion to kind of get our youth involved in what we do and I think it is important. Mr. Lon When I was a graduate student at the University of Oregon getting my masters in architecture I took a course in historic preservation and the requirements of that course were to write up and do the research; write up the application; have accepted on to the National Register of Historic Buildings two structures within Oregon community. So I have been thinking you know as part of our work with the Commission that maybe there will be an opportunity within the community college to provide a course and I don't know how that happens . Mr. Wichman: UH has it in place in Honolulu. There is a good historic preservation curriculum in Honolulu. Mr. Long: Yes so if we can have that happen. I think there is a way we can use or having students participate in our classes. and also taking advantage of their energy and thirst for knowledge. Mr. Wichman: Would be dependent on an individual within the KCC administration to bird dog it if we go into KCC. The same goes through for high school. An individual in the high school is the point man that points and organizes within the high schools. Mr. Long: I would just offer that I would personally and professionally be interested in doing that. You know and I don't want to be paid professor or however that happens but I do have some experience in this area. So maybe there could be some course given or the high school curriculum and special. Chair: What have you got over there? Mr. Jung: I was just looking at the Charter. It says each commissioner shall be at the time of his or her appointment a duly qualified resident elect of the County. So I think they have to be over the age of 18. But I gotta double check that. Chair: Are you sure? Cause I thought when we talked, well they wouldn' t be official because they wouldn't be voting. Mr. Jung: Well that still and that' s why I wanted to clarify what your intent was in terms of looking at a high school student because we could style it as not necessarily an appointed commissioner but some kind of participating member. Chair: And what I was thinking high school. That' s kind of the theory I was going for cause I . . . September G, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 18 Mr. Jung. Cause then they would have to serve the three years. Mr. Wichman: Now you have to include KCC. Chair: I guess so. Mr. Jung: Yes it says appointed commissioner has to serve a three year term. Mr. Wichman: So there is no possible way it can be official. Chair: It would only be for a school term like from the beginning of the school year. Ms. Griffin: If we wanted to do something with any age student would that necessitate a change in the Ordinance 496? Mr. Jun- t I think it depends on the context. If we are actually going to get another commissioner then we would have to change it to some kind of ex-officio, non-voting in addition to the Mayor. Cause the Mayor is technical, he can come be an ex-officio member any time. So would be the salve status . But if you guys wanted to create some kind of like guest, I don't want to call it commissioner, but guest something or other that can come here and participate in discussion then you guys could technically suspend your rules and then entertain the guest topic and you can suspend the rules and allow them to come up and discuss items with you here. So there is a way to do it without having to go into an ordinance change but then we are still looking at the other element and changing the name and that kind of thing. Ms. Griffin: So do any other boards or commissions have an adjunct person? Mr. Jung: No . Chair: We would be the first one. Ms. Griffin: Ok. I would suggest, because there are I think Kuulei brought up some important kind of philosophical questions for us about what this commission does, who we are which is imbedded in the name and so forth and some of that, as she says, really will cause a change to the ordinance. You all probably took a look at the ordinance again too in the last month. But I would recommend what you suggested Ian last month when this discussion came up . I think that this is a broad enough discussion and an important enough one that we establish a P I G to go through it and have you help out and do some sort of draft because this ordinance is over 25 years old and there are so many things that don't, that were good at its conception but we don't really think in terms of historic districts these days the way it's all listed in our purpose. We do talk about education so I think we would be better off to establish a small group to go through the ordinance. Look at it and what's no longer, what no longer gives us life and also look at the things like how the name represents who we are, and what we should be doing, and how September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 19 we can bring in youth to it, and where we are in relationship to the ordinance. I think it will be a lot more productive than taking it piece meal. Mr. Wichman: So create a P I G? Ms. Sheehan: But then you are ultimately, I guess the impression is that this is an outdated document and by the time you rearrange it or see the discrepancies to where we are and what it is you are asking for changes. Chair: Well one thing that I wanted to add to this was culture. I think that culture is not defined in . . . Ms. Sheehan: So we come up with the P I G to set our recommendations . . . Mr. . Wichman: Not necessarily in changing the entire document. We are only looking at the aspect that allows us to have educational opportunities for youth. Ms. Sheehan: And the name change. Chair: But I wanted to add. . . ` Mr. Wichman: The name change is another subject that needs to be. Ms. Griffin: What I am saying is that we have an opportunity because these questions are significant enough and may change our operation that we should take the time to look at the entire ordinance and see how it fits together and I know that the CZO is in the process of being updated anyway. So I think this is a good time to do it. Mr. Wichman: Are we suggesting to review the entire ordinance? Ms. Griffin: Yes all three pages of it. I don't know if we are redoing it. We are reviewing it. You know and the review starts with are we the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission or . . . Ms. Sheehan: Another name. Ms. Griffin: Dot, dot, dot. Ellipses here. Ms. Sheehan: Well it fits in with, I just keep asking whether in reviewing a bigger document which would take a little longer and that's a process. So we are hitting the points that Kuulei was questioning. Students, name, you know. Chair: And the only thing with the name was that the fact that like Maui for example, they have the word cultural in their name and I think it' s important. I think that, that's part of what we should. So that's my whole purpose of bringing that up. September 6, 2012 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 20 Mr. Wichman: I would separate the discussion cause the name change is very different than bringing youth in as guests . Things like that. Chair: Well let' s start with the youth first. Are you guys opposed to having youth involved in our commission? Mr. Wichman: As guests is definitely, yes I think we could try it out as invited guest in some way without being too bureaucratic about it in the beginning 4nd then at the end of this 2013 we can review it again about this participation. If we could do that and then that subject is over. The second subject is are we going to consider the name change. Then what are all the options. So to explore all the options and the ramifications of a name change, again that' s a very serious subject. Then there is the third one which is . . . Chair: Then we can appoint a P I �G to explore all of that. Mr. Wichman: The third one would be to actually review the entire ordinance again and maybe or maybe not recommendations will be forthcoming for the overall document. Ms. Griffin: Well the name change would change the law. So if we are going to change the law with one little thing, then we should look at the whole thing. I am totally confused about what a guest, a young guest, would do. I don't know how it fit in. Chair: Do you want to . . . Mr. Jung: I have got to take a look at it cause you know one, I am thinking ok how are we going to get parental consent; and two, what type of level of involvement they would have. Cause technically they could come up here and discuss with you guys but obviously no vote because they are not a commissioner. So I just have to think in my head, now that we know that it' s going to be high school we can move forward. Chair: High school of KCC. Looks like we are moving to KCC. Mr. Wichman: Think KCC version. Chair: And one of our goals is supposed to nominating things and then getting it on the list. Is that right? That is one of our requirements. Mr. Jung: Yes and I think you could. Chair: So wouldn't that student help to do the research for that. Ms. Griffin: But then who is going to manage that person and what kind of, you know, I have been around long enough to have seen a lot of groups who want to involve students but all volunteer labor is expensive and without having a very specific agenda for this person or persons September G, 2012 K.I-LP.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 21 and some way for them to take it back and respond. You know what are we asking of this person, and what are we expecting from them, and who is going to manage them . I think, I can tell this is, I am not expressing myself but all of that gets into what the ordinance says who we are and are we going to expect Planning Department staff to put in X amount of hours to deal with this person and so I don't think you know I haven't heard a specific thing on what we are expecting of theirs and what we intend for them. Ms. Aiu: If this isn't on the floor for a vote but if it was on the floor for a vote my vote would be no . I am definitely not against kids learning history. I have a picture of my six grades which I took after school. Nobody ever knew the Historical Society and what they did and there is my little kids with their gloves going through papers. I do not think that education of the young is the role of this commission and I don't want us to get distracted. I already see how distracted we are from the role of the commission which is not education: cause it is going to put another, like you said, who, what, when, where right. And I have gone through many teenagers so I know the store. They are really busy. I think that the concept that you wanted is good. I think the motors of the (inaudible) is not where we want to be. We sure do want to do historical education but I think that when we were formed we were formed as historic preservation and it has a legal aspect when we say things here it' s all recorded. We have to make sense. To me it' s just too distracting. I think let's stay with what we are. Your second part about changing the name. I think that's already an involved thing too. Like you say. Today I was going through a lot of old papers. You know me I have all the old papers and I was trying to look more on the heiau and I think you said you might be giving us more information cause I found so little information. And then names change and places change and I am trying to figure out is it here. Is it there? Sometimes I call any sister. How did they use this term. So I looked at how many things I had. I had files of stuff that say KHPRC and I am thinking ok somebody in the future like me from long ago and look at something and say oh what happened. And my sister asked did the newspaper change its name. Well yea there the Holomua and then they went to this or that. So for a person just trying to go through from the historical aspect, I hate name changes they just get me so confused in my research. But I am not against it, I am just saying wow this thing. But I am again having, at first I thought yea and then after that I just went no, no when I started to really think about all the you know you brought up so many good points. Ok are these kids are really going to come. You talk to my granddaughter I hardly every see her. She got band. She got football. She got this. She got that. A they are so busy these kids . Chair: What about college then? Ms . Aiu: Ok I not sure about college students. I think if you guys have some ask some people in mind. Talk to some kids and see what they think about it. Would they be interested in sitting at a meeting for three or four hours. You know what I mean. Chair: Ok one last thing what about adding cultural? September 6. 2012 KILP.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 22 Ms. Aiu: I am not against that part. We got to look and wb need advice. Ms . Griffin: That' s a change of law and I continue to say it needs to ; we need to look at the entire law and how it all fits together if we are changing any of that. And it is worth doing because it says who we are and what our responsibilities are. All of us should know this ordinance. Ms. Sheehan: What if, you were taking earlier about a P I G, a group, a committee to look at that and I didn't get a sense that there was a timetable but what if we approached the seniors in high schools all the schools and say that this is a project that they could spend hours on as a community project. We need to review what this commission does and you will learn about what this commission does by not sitting in these meeting but being on a committee and then they can come to these meetings and just listen because that always helps. But they might be able to do one specific thing which is help this committee of us review this document. Ms. Griffin: You know when I, as you all know I owned an advertising agency for many years and one of the things that would just set my teeth on edge is, it happened a lot on non-profits and never happens in for profit corporations but people would say they need a logo and say let' s have a contest. Well it's like asking for a contest for your will. You know it' s a professional thing and who knows an entity better. Why put that out to chance for people who don' t know the entity at all at this stage. And I think that's what you are asking if it ju.>t gets broadcast out like seeds on the wind. I think that people that are involved with the current law and people who are sitting and responsible for the you know to function under it are going to have a much better sense than people who have no training. No experience. No sense. No idea of what 106 is or 4F of the transportation act, or 36E. Ms . Sheehan: It' s a learning experience for them. I mean they have to go look it up. What is 106? Ok they go home and look it up. Ms. Griffin: I think it's great for education. I just don't think it' s good for law making. Mr. Wichman: The normal conduit is through UH, the historic preservation program. When and if such a day KCC gets an historic preservation class together then we would cooperate and help with it but all of that would be directed through the KCC course requirements and all of that. Once that infrastructure is over there on the academic level then we are ,just there to support essentially and then. we would go on with our business to help them. So that structure is there. Ms. Sheehan: To get the kids to come and have something specific to do besides just sit at this panel which I think they will get lost. Mr. Wichmaw What you said at the beginning was within the KCC program, the historic preservation classes. Start that. Put the bug in their ears and maybe in a few years it could exist and then we would easily accommodate their requirements for their course load. Chair: Ok so do we want to create a P I G to go over our article 25 or no? September 6, 2012 K.1-1.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 23 Ms. Sheehan: I guess I don't have a sense of whether that is going to take so much longer that we have to do it anyway with the name change . . . Chair: Or just to review that if we want to add to it. Ms. Sheehan: So that would entail, if we decided when we review that when we wanted to change our name that would be part of the review and part of the recomnlendati.on to you know we would like to add this and delete this. Is that what we are doing with this document? Kind of reviewing it and . . . Mr. Wichman: Those who are not familiar with it. . . Mr. Jung : I think if you did want to, you guys could certainly do it collective if you want. But if there is three or four of you that want to come together and meet on it and then I could certainly make myself available to make sure we are in compliance with the grant process and what not. We could do it. We just did it with our Open Space Commission where they relooked at how and what their role is and redefine themselves in terms of how they can operate under their charter provision that established them. Chair: How did that go? Mr. Jung: Good. I mean it took about three years but it' s because it started out and stalled and then we regenerated it about a year ago and then got it complete and got Council to approve it. So from start when we restarted it, it took about 10 months . Because when you go through the legislative process the Planning Director introduces it to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission to full hearing and then got to referred it up to the Council. Council has got to introduce it and then you got to go first reading and send to committee. Do a public hearing and the send it to second reading. So the life span of a bill at its quickest is about three months up at Council. Adding in to the Planning Commission where you have to generate a report based on what changes you are doing that adds another two months. So you are looking at five, six months span time. So it does take a while but if you guys start the process now we can iron out all the kinks here it might move a little faster. Chair: Instead of doing the P I G do you guys want to go over section by section during the meeting and block out 15 minutes? No . Ms , Griffin: Well the thing is we get to this important stuff at the end and there are always other things that come first and then people leave and they didn't show up this time but next time they will and 15 minutes and then we forget what happened before and it seems to be that having concentrated focus on a single issue event. Now the other question is do we want to have a second meeting in the month. When I suggest a P I G it's only because I don't know how much my fellow commissioners would want to meet for this. But I think and I don' t think we are going to be our most productive doing manini little stuff after every monthly meeting. September 6, 2012 IC.II.P.I2.C. Meeting Minutes Page 24 Mr. Wichman: It ends up, I remember the conversations when this commission was formed through Barnes, my grandmother, and others who were the first commissioners and when the name actually carne out and was discussed and hwy the chose the name that we have today. Long story short the only thing that was considered by them at that point was to drop the name review and become a full blown commission. That was the only the only thing considered at that point. The reason they did that and they way it was named and some point the name review would fall and long story short the minute that word drops from the title then under non-compliance issues this commission would have the authority to issue cease and desist orders. So the whole dynamics of the commission changes from a review to a full. blown. Now those are the discussions that are at the heart I think of the original intent of the name to begin with. Barnes would be able to say yes when are you going to be able to drop the review because it was definitely one of his bits graduating into a full blown commission. And whether or not we are prepared to entertain what that means I don't know. But I dream about it. Chair: Ok so what would you guys like to do? I say let' s do a P I G. That' s ,just my personal opinion but it' s up to you guys. Mr. Jung: If we do, do a P I G we got to notice the scope next meeting and then you can appointment the members when you are defining the scope. Chair: What are your guy' s feelings? Ms. Sheehan: The choices are more than one meeting a month. Ms. Aiu: I am not saying anything because I feel that when you talk you should be willing to put it up and say ok I am willing to be a member and I am not willing to be a member. I have the inventory already right and I put myself there and I said that I would do this. So that's why I am not saying anything. (Laughter in the background). Mr. Wichman: I want to volunteer for the P I G. Ms. Griffin: Well fortunately we don't have to decide that this month. Chair: Ok so we can ,just think about it and put it on the agenda for next month. Let' s all think about it right and let's all review this Article 25 long and hard and then we will come back next month and talk about it. How does that sound? Mr. Wichman: That's sound great. Chair: Does that sound great? Does everybody have Article 25 ? Shan can you send an email to everybody with Article 25 please. Fabulous so does that sound good? All right moving on. September 6, 2412 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes Page 2.5 SELECTION OF NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS The next KHPRC meeting was scheduled on Thursday, October 4, 2012 , ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4 :45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ; ' 04 IMIee U. Jimenez Secretary S.g ? 2 8 2012 Date: 425 Ena Road, Suite 206A 3501 Rice Street, 200A Honolulu, Hawaii, 96815 Lihue, Fli 96766 (808) 927-2467 651-5764 (803) 632-2467 e-maim = ranagorarsEiiteeturc.com DATE: September 26, 2012 TO: Michael Dahili.g, Planning Director 4444 Rice Street Lihue, Hi 96766 RE: Hanalei Pier Pavilion KHPRC Presentation Dear Mr. Dahilig, We are requesting to be on the KHPRC 's agenda to present the demolition and reconstruction of the Hanalei Pier Pavilion for the 4"' of October. The Hanalei Pier Pavilion has been designated as unsafe and is being scheduled to be removed by the Department of Land and Resources (DLNR). It is anticipated that the state may take at least a, year before funding could be make available for the reconstruction of the pavilion. The procurement process may extend the reconstruction process for eighteen to twenty four months at minimum. The North Shore Community, led by the Rotary Club, is concerned that the community Will not have the Hanalei Pier Pavilion to enjoy for an extended period of tune. Therefore, they took it upon themselves to raise the funds for materials and organized a workforce to vol charily re- build the pavilion. My office, Agor Architecture, volunteered the plans and engineering for the reconstruction. The work will be observed by my office throughout the reconstruction period. The demolition anal reconstruction is presently scheduled to start on the first week in November. On October 4"', we would. like to do a courtesy presentation of the reconstruction plans of the Hanalei Pier Pavilion to the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Committee. Attached you will find the proposed floor plan and elevations . Should you have any questions, please contact me at the above contact information. RerAgg dly ubmitted, F t` Ro r, ri c. c. Mayor' s OCT 0 4 2012 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT BI-MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT Grant Recipient: Grant #: _ Report for months of: Contact Person. Daytime Phone #: Describe the progress made during this 2 month period toward accomplishing the goals of your project. Refer to work elements and products listed in the Exhibit C-contract scope of work. Is the project currently on schedule? If not, please explain. Describe any significant problems encountered this month which may impede the successful and titt2ely completion of your project. Return by the 5` of every two months to: (email is recommended) Email Electronic Copy to the State Proieet Manager and CLG Coordinator: Or Mail Hard Copy to: State Historic Preservation Division 601 Kamolika Ka olei, Hawaii 00 s OCT 0 4 2012 Itemized Project Match Category Column I Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Match accumulated Value of match Total match Amount of match this month (hours, accumulated this accumulated to date committed to per mileage, etc.) month (Column 1 x (including this contract (Exhibit D) unit cost) month A. Volunteer hours $ $ $ hours B. Staff/other hours $ $ $ hours C. Mileage $ $ $ miles D. Room use and $ $ $ rental E. Contributed $ $ $ Materials F. Contributed $ $ $ Communication G. Contributed $ $ $ Services KIMURA INTERNATIONAL INC. September 12, 2012 Ms. Kuulel Santos, Chair Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission c/o Kauai Planning Department 4444 Rice Street, Suite 473 Lihu` e, HI 96766 Dear Ms. Santos : Subject: National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 Consultation Lydgate Park to Kapa`a Bike/Pedestrian Path (Phases C&D) Waipouli, Kawaihau District, Kauai TMK : [4] 4-3-001 , 002, and 007 : various Kimura International is the planning consultant for the Kauai Department of Public Works (DPW) for Phases C&D of the Lydgate Park to Kapa` a Bike/Pedestrian Path. As pall: of the Section 106 consultation process required for this project, we are requesting a place on the agenda for the Commission' s October meeting. The DPW is conducting an environmental review for Phases C&D of the path, which extends from Papaloa Road (north of Kauai Sands Hotel) to Waipouli Beach Resort on the north side of Uhelekawawa Canal, a distance of 6, 100 to 6,500 feet, depending on the final alignment. The proposed alignment is predominantly along the coastline. The County will own and operate the path and provide a portion of the project' s funding. The Federal Highway Administration (FliWA) will also fund a portion of the path, thereby triggering compliance requirements under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Department of Transportation Act (Section 4f) . More detailed project information is provided in the enclosed supporting document. At the October meeting, we would like to present an overview of the project and will respond to questions. In accordance with Section 106, we are seeking the Commission' s input based on your knowledge of historic properties in the proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE), including issues related to the project' s potential effects on historic properties If you have any questions, please contact my associate, Nancy Nishikawa at nnishikawa @L<imurainternational .com or Ph (808) 944-8848, or the County' s project manager, Douglas Haigh, Kauai Department of Public Works at Ph. 241 -4849 . Sincerely, Glenn T. Kimura President 1600 Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1610 Honolulu, Hl 96814 Tel: 808 944-8848 • Fax: 808 941-8999 oc 0 4 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path , Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Supporting Documentation for Section 106 Consultation Project Background and Purpose In 2007, the Kauai Department of Public Works (DPW) completed an environmental assessment (EA) for a bike/pedestrian path from Lydgate Park to Kapa` a (Lihi Park) and made a finding of no significant impact. The preferred alignment identified in the original EA included a section located mauka of Kuhi6 Highway and along the Waipouli drainage canal, shown as Phase E in Figure 1 . The EA was followed by more detailed design studies which determined that crossing Kuhio Highway and the temporary bypass road would not be optimal for path users. Because the bike/pedestrian path will extend as far north as Coconut Marketplace (via the Papaloa Road spur) and as far south as Uhelekawawa Canal, the County reexamined options to connect these two points. The most feasible option was a makai route that had been proposed and studied in the Draft Environmental Assessment for the original path project—to locate the path within portions of the beach reserve owned by the County. The DPW is currently preparing a supplemental environmental assessment (SEA) whose purpose is to reevaluate the "makai alternative." Referred to as Phases C and D or the "Waipouli connection," this section of the bike/pedestrian path will measure approximately 6 , 100 to 6,500 feet, depending on the final alignment. The project' s primary objectives are to provide a safe and inviting facility that will expand opportunities for non-motorized travel and recreation; provide connectivity to shopping, dining, and resort areas; and lateral coastal access . Project Description and Location Consistent with the overall facility, the bike/pedestrian path will be 10 to 12 feet wide and allow movement in both directions. It is intended to accommodate a wide variety of users; however, motorized vehicles will not be allowed with the exception of motorized wheelchairs, emergency vehicles, and maintenance vehicles. The path will be constructed from concrete with graded shoulders. Under some environmettal conditions, the path's design and construction materials may vary to address 'issues of context sensitivity . No new parking areas will be provided; however, the project will include rehabilitation of an existing County parking area located behind. Kapa` a Missionary Church. Construction of a small comfort station is being considered at the parking lot. One stream crossing will be needed at Uhelekawawa Canal, but the crossing will not require work in the water. Because the path will traverse developed areas, it may be necessary to relocate and/or replace existing facilities or plant life--actions that are included in the project description. Other construction and design elements appurtenant to the bike/pedestrian path include grading, walls, railings, fencing, landscaping, signage, and amenities, such as trash receptacles, benches, water fountains, and shielded security lighting. The decision to incorporate specific feature; Will be made during final design. Sec 106 Supporting Document 1 September 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path , Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Figure 2 shows the project location. The SEA will focus on a preferred alternative that extends from Papaloa Road, between Kauai Sands Hotel and Islander on the Beach, then north through the County' s beach reserve and along the coastal bench makai of three undeveloped parcels and Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach. The preferred alternative continues between Mokihana of Kaua` i/Bull Shed Restaurant and the Village Manor condominiums., then along the southern bank of Uhelekawawa Canal (currently a landscaped strip) to Kuhio Highway. The path will cross Uhelekawawa Canal as a cantilevered attachment to the existing highway bridge or an independent single-span bridge, where it will connect to the existing bike path fronting Waipouli Beach Resort. On the northern end of the Waipouli connection, the SEA will also assess the use of an existing beach access located south of Kapaa Missionary Church and the right-of-way adjacent to and makai of Kuhio Highway between the beach access and Uhelekawawa Canal (approximately 580 feet) . Project Area and Land Jurisdictloil The Waipouli connection passes through portions of three ahupua `a: South Olohena, North Olohena, and Waipouli. The Waipouli coastal stretch today is largely composed of resort (hotel, condominium, timeshare) and commercial properties, including the Kauai Sands Hotel, Islander on the Beach, Kauai Coast Resort, Courtyard Kauai, Mokihana of Kauai, Village Manor condominiums, and Waipouli Beach Resort. The Coconut Marketplace shopping complex is on the south end, and the Waipouli Town Center and Kauai Village Shopping Center are just mauka of Kuhio Highway on the north end. Three large, coastal properties are undeveloped, but they are zoned for resort development and have obtained Special Management Area (SMA) permits for resort-oriented development. In addition to the larger properties, there is a cluster of smaller parcels located south of Uhelekawawa Canal consisting of residences, small businesses along the highway, and the Kapaa Missionary Church. From the Papaloa Road "start" point, the County has an easement located between Kauai Sands and Islander on the Beach. The path will be located within this easement. As the path heads north along the coastline, it will be located within a County-owned beach reserve which extends as far as the Kauai Coast Resort. Although a beach reserve has not been set aside north of the Kauai Coast Resort, development conditions are in place requiring existing (in the case of Courtyard Kauai) and future resort development to provide lateral coastal access that would be satisfied by the proposed bike/pedestrian path. Along the southern boundary of Mokihana of Kauai, there is an existing mauka- makai beach access. The path Will be located along the length of this access to Kuhio Highway or, alternatively, take a jog parallel to the coastline then along the south bank of Uhelekawawa Canal. The latter alignment will require acquisition of privately owned land. Sec 106 Supporting Document 2 September 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path, Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Figure 3a and 3b show the path alignment on tax maps for the area. Figure 4 identifies the TMKs and property owners in the County of Kauai tax assessment records as of January 2012. Historic Preservation Regulatory Context As a project that is partially funded by the County, this undertaking must comply with Hawaii State laws for environmental review (Hawai` i Revised Statutes [HRS] Chapter 343) and historic preservation review (HRS Chapter 6E-8 and Hawaii Administrative Rules [HAR] Chapter 13 - 13-275). Additionally, because the path is expected to receive funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), it is federal undertaking requiring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Section 4(f) of the U.S . Department of Transportation Act, Section 106 consultations were conducted as part of the original Lydgate Park-Kapa` a Bike/Pedestrian Path project and resulted in the SHPD, the FHWA, and the County of Kauai being signatories to a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The MOA affirmed an "effect" to significant historic properties in the project area, including the Wailua Complex of Heiau, cultural deposits, and inadvertently discovered burial sites. Specific, mitigation measures are stipulated in the MOA and include the following, some of which have been implemented already. • Archaeological monitoring plan appropriate for each path section to be implemented during construction. The archaeological monitoring plan is to be reviewed and approved by the SHPD before project implementation and a follow-up monitoring report. submitted upon completion. • Burial treatment plan to address the preservation of any burials or other human remains in the event of inadvertent discoveries of iwi • Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documentation for the Wailua Cane Haul (makai) Bridge—completed • Preservation/interpretive plan addressing interpretive signage along the path— completed for the Wailua River crossing section. The MOA will continue to remain in effect, but may be amended as a result of additional consultations related to project-related 'impacts in Phases C and D. Sec 106 Supporting Document 3 September 12 , 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path, Phases C&D (Waipoufi Connection) Proposed Area of Potential Effect (APE) The proposed APE, shown in Figure 5, includes a 50-foot wide corridor•, 25 feet on either side of the center line. The exact placement of the path will not be determined until the final design phase. However, the path, including paved surface, shoulders, fencing, and landscaping is not expected to exceed a width of 20 feet. Based on a 50-foot wide corridor, and alignment ranging from 6;100 to 6,500 feet in length, the APE would include an area of 7.0 to 7. 5 acres. Historic Property in the AP Potentially Affected Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Inc. conducted an archaeological assessment for the Lydgate to Kapa` a bike/pedestrian path (Hammatt and Shideler 2001) and a cultural impact assessment for Phases C & D of the path (Vogeler et al 2012). The information in this section is based on those studies. Figure 6 shows the locations of historic properties. In previous archaeological work along the beach terrace of Waipouli, cultural layers and human burials have been uncovered both at the Coconut Plantation Resort area and the Uhelekawawa area (designated Sites 50-30-08-791 , 1800, and 1801 ). Dates for the use of these sites are the 15th century for the former and the 16th century for the latter. Archaeologists believe that the Coconut Plantation area was a recreational area due to its extensive layer, but paucity of artifacts. The Uhelekawawa area has a thick cultural layer with traditional artifacts representing activities such as tool manufacture for fishing and woodworking and for weapons. The abundance of these tools suggesting the area was a work site rather than a permanent habitation site. During fieldwork for the original path project, a concrete WWII era military structure (designated Site 50-30-08-891 ) was located fronting the shoreline within a vacant lot adjacent to the southwest side of the Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The brick and reinforced concrete structure, measuring 3 .4 by 3 . 8 m with four metal posts for mounting equipment, is believed to be a former military pillbox or rnachme-gun emplacement constructed to defend against coastal invasion by enemy forces. Sec 106 Supporting Document 4 September 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path, Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Table 1 : Summary of Archaeological and Historic Sites that May be Affected by the Undertaking Site General Location Function Site Constraints Reference No. 50-s0- 08 791 Northeast end of Cultural layer Extends inland Perzinski ee al. 2001 coastal South and burials (2) approximately 150 ft. Olohena from the coast; archaeological monitoring in area proposed 891 Coast near North WWII bunker Coast near North Hammatt and Otohena/Waipouli Olohena/Waipouli Shideler 2004 boundary boundary; interpretive potential 1800 Northeast end of Cultural Iayer Extends inland Rosendahl and Kai coastal North and burials (2) approximately 120 ft. 1990 Olohena from the coast; a.rclhaeological monitoring in the area proposed 1801 Adjacent to coast, Cultural layer Archaeological Rosendahl and Kai south central and burials (5) monitoring in the 1990; Hammatt Waipouli, 200 in area proposed 1991 a, 1991 b; makai of Kuhi6 Toenjes et al. 1991 Highway Historic Property in the Vicinity of, but Outside the Proposed APE Two historic sites are located in the vicinity of the project area, but outside the proposed APE. The bike/pedestrian path is not expected to adversely affect these sites. Kukui Heiau. The heiau, located at Alakukui Point was placed on the Hawaii Register of Historic Places on June 13 , 1986, and was placed on the National Register on May 18, 1987. The site extends from high water up and into the Lae Nam Condominium parcel. The earlier planning effort for the bike/pedestrian path studied an alternative extending along the back of Kukui Heiau. However, based on public concerns about potential adverse effects on this significant historic property, any alternative transiting the coast at Alakukui Point was dismissed. The proposed alignment for the Waipouli connection veers inland from the coast approximately 360 feet from Kukui Heiau. Establishing a well-defined and signed bike and pedestrian route is expected to diminish undesired intrusions upon the heiau. Sec 106 Supporting Document 5 September 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path, Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Central Waipouli Cultural Layers and Burials. Site 1836 is located on the north side of Uhelekawawa Canal. Referred to as the Golding property in earlier archaeological studies, a large portion of the property has been developed into the Waipouli Beach Resort. Hammatt ( 1992) and McCurdy and Hammatt (2008) report a total of 50 burials unearthed at the site and 396 artifacts recovered. A cultural preserve has been established within the resort area. The proposed path alignment would be physically separated from Site 1836 by Uhelekawawa Canal. And because the cultural preserve is located on private property with access is supervised by resort personnel, the path is not expected to adversely impact the site. Table 2: Summary of Archaeological Sites in the Vicinity, but Outside the APE Site General Location Function Site Constraints Reference No. 50-30- 08 108 Alakukui Point, Kukui Heiau Extends from high Thrum 1906; central South water to Lae Nani Bennett 1931 ; Davis Olohena on coast Condo property; and Bordner 1977 ; proposed path Kawaehi 1993 alignment avoids heiau and diverts foot and bicycle traffic away from the heiau 1836 Central Waipouli, Waipouli cultural Cultural preserve Folk et al. 1991 ; strongest expression layer and burials established on the Folk and Hammatt at coast, extends to ( 15) Waipouli Beach 1991 ; Hammatt and Kuhi6 Highway Resort property Folk 1992; Hammatt et al . 2000 ; Ida et al. 2000; McCurdy and Hammatt 2008 Wailua Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) Boundaries have been delineated for the TCP of Wailua (also known as Wailuanuiaho` ano and Wailua Kai) extending makai of Mauna Kapu (Kalepa) and Nounou ridges and encompassing a portion of Wailua Bay. Given the extensive coverage of the TCP, the coastal path from Lydgate Park to Kapa` a cannot avoid passage through the district. In the culturally rich Wailua Beach section, the footprint of the bike/pedestrian path was minimized to fit within a widened shoulder area immediately makai of the existing highway. Phase D of the bike/pedestrian path is located along the northern boundary of the TCP, which runs mauka-makai between Kauai Sands and Islander on the Beach (see Figure 7). Sec 106 Supporting Document 6 September 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path, Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Cultural (Archaeological) Resource Inventory Survey An archaeological inventory survey has been conducted by Cultural Surveys Hawaii to assist in evaluating the undertaking' s potential to affect National Register-eligible cultural resources. The effort included a systematic pedestrian inspection to identify surface cultural deposits, preliminary investigation with ground penetrating radar', and Q. series of hand and mechanical (backhoe) excavation. The Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) report is being drafted at this time, and will be provided as soon as possible. References Bennett, Wendell C. 1931 . The Archaeology of Kauai, Bishop Museum Bulletin 80, Honolulu, HI Davis, Bertell D. and R. M. Bordner. 1977. Archaeological Investigation at Kukui Heiau, South Olohena, Puna, Kauai Island. Unpublished Ms, Archaeglogical Research Center Hawai` l, Inc. ARCH 14-98, Honolulu, HI Folk, William H., Rodney Chiogioji, Matthew J. McDermott, Hallett H. Hammatt. 1991 . Archaeological Survey and Subsurface Testing at Waipouli, Kauai, State of Hawaii Site No. 50-30-08- 1836, Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Folk, William H. and Hallett H. Hammatt. 1991 . Addendum to Archaeological Survey and Subsurface testing at Waipouli Kauai, State of Hawai` 1 Site No . 50-80-08- 1836. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Hammatt, Hallett H. 1991a. Archaeological Testing Results for a 12-acre Property, Coconut Plantation, Waipouli, Kauai. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Hammatt, Hallett H. 1991b , Archaeological Subsurface Testing for the Proposed Kapaa Sewerline, Wailua, Olohena, Waipouli and Kapaa, Kauai. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Hammatt, Hallett H, and William H. Folk. 1992, Archaeological Subsurface Testing of a One-Acre Parcel: Waipouli, Kauai TMK 4-3 -06 :01 . Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Hammatt, Hallett H. and David W. Shideler. 2004. Archaeological Assessment of Alternative Routes Proposed for the Lydgate to Kapaa Bike and Pedestrian Pathway Project within the Ahupua` a of Wailua, South Olohena, North Olohena, Waipouli, and Kapaa. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Hammatt, Hallett H., David W. Shideler, John Winieski, and David Perzinski. 2000 . Archaeological Data Recovery for a 12 Acre Parcel (The Golding Property) at Sec 106 Supporting Document 7 September 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path , Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Waipouli, Puna, Kauai, (TMK 4-3 -08 : 1 ), Volume 1 . Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Ida, Gerald, David W. Shideler, and Hallett H. Hammatt. 2000. Documentation of Burial Disinterment and Re-interment at the "Golding Property," Waipouii, Kawaihau, Kauai (TMK 4-3 -08 : 1 ) . Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Kawachi, Carol T. 1993 . Archaeological Monitoring of the Kuhio Highway Widening Project, Wailua, Kawaihau, Kauai, State Historic Preservation Division, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu, HI McCurdy, Todd and Hallett H. Hammatt. 2008 . Archaeological Monitoring Report for the Waipouli Beach Resort (SIHP #50-30-08- 1836), Waipouli Ahupua` a, Kawaihau District, Kauai (TMK: [41-4-3 -0 8 : 1 ), Cultural Surveys HAVai`i, Kailua, HI Perzinski, David, David W. Shideler and Hallett H. Hammatt. 2001 . An Archaeological Monitoring Report for Renovatiosn at the Kauai Coast Resort, State Site #50-30- 08-791 , Ahupua` a of South Olohena, Kawaihau District, Island of Kauai (TMK 4-3 -02 : 14) . Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Rosendahl, Paul H. and Victoria K. Kai. 1990. Archaeological Inventory Survey Coconut Plantation Developemnt Sites 4 and 6, Lands of Olohena and Waipouli, Kawaihau District, Island of Kauai (TMK: 44-3 -02 : 16, 44-307 :27), PHRI, Hilo, HI Thrum, Thomas G. 1906. Heiau and Heiau Sites Throughout the Hawaiian Islands, Kauai, in Hawaiian Almanac and Annual 1907, pp. 36-48 , Honolulu, HI Toenjes, James H. Rodney Chiogioji, William H. Folk, and Hallett H. Hammatt. 1991 . Results of Archaeological Data Recovery for a 12-acre Property at Coconut Plantation, Waipouli, Kauai, (TMK 4-3-07:27) . Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, HI Vogeler, Kuhio, Margaret Magat, and Hallett H. Hammatt. 2012. Cultural Impact Assessment for Lydgate Park-Kapa` a Bike & Pedesstrian Path Phases C&D, CMAQ-0700(49), South Olohena, North Olohena and Waipouli Ahupua` a, Kawaihau District, Kauai Island, TMK: [4] 4-3 -001 , 002, and 007 : Various. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, Hi Sec 106 Supporting Document 8 Septembbr 12, 2012 Lydgate Park-Kapaa Bike/Pedestrian Path, Phases C&D (Waipouli Connection) Figures I . Overall Bike/Pedestrian Path Alignment in Pleases 2. Project Location 3a. Tax Map 4-3-002 3b, Tax Map 4-3 -007 4. Land Ownership 5 . Aerial with Proposed Area of Potential Effect (APE) 6. Historic Properties 7. Wailua Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) 8 . Photo Locations Sec 106 Supporting Document 9 September 12, 2012