HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 5, 2013 MEETING OF THE
KAUA'I COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER S, 2013 '13 AUG 30 P 3 *646
3 :00 p.m.
Lihu'e Civic Center, Moil{eha Building
Meeting Room 2A/2B
T
" " . t ,z
4444 Rice Street, Lihu'e, Kaua'i CoUp.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 1 , 2013 MEETING MINUTES
A. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS
B. COMMUNICATIONS (None)
C.
D . UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 . Class IV Zoning Permit Z=IV-2013 -17, Project Development Use Permit PDU-
2013 - 15, and Use Permit U-2013- 14 to develop a research complex facilitating
research in various dormitory buildings, various accessory structures, and
provision for off-street parking, Tax Map Key: 5-2-013 :001 , Kilauea, Kauai,
Hawaii = The Resonance Project Foundation .
2, Certified Local Government (CLG) Status
E. NEW BUSINESS
1 . Letter (8/14/13) from Michael Hunnemarm, KAI Hawai'i, Inc. requesting to
present plans for partial repair of the timber Kapaia Swinging Bridge on behalf of
the Department of Public Works, County of Kauai.
September 5, 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Agenda
Page 2
E . SELECTION OF NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS ( 10/3/2013)
F. ADJOURNMENT
EXECUTIVE SESSION : The Commission may go into an executive session on an agenda item for
one of the permitted purposes Iisted in Section 92-5(a) Hawaii Revised Statutes ("H.R.S."),
without noticing the executive session on the agenda where the executive session was not
anticipated in advance. HRS Section 92-7(a). The executive session may only be held,
however, upon an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members present, which must also
be the majority of the members to which the board is entitled. HRS Section 92-4. The
reason for holding the executive session shall be publicly announced.
Note: Special accommodations and sign Ianguage interpreters are available upon request
five (5) days prior to the meeting date, to the County Planning Department, 4444 Rice
Street, Suite 473 , Lihue, Hawaii 96766. Telephone: 241-4050.
KAUAI COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION
Lihu` e Civic Center, Mo ' ikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A-2B
MINUTES
A regular meeting of the Kauai County Historic Preservation Review Commission (KHPRC)
was held on August 1 , 2013 in the Lihu` e Civic Center, Mo ' ikeha Building, Meeting Room
2A-2B.
The following Commissioners were present_ Danita Aiu, Chairperson, Stephen Long, Vice
Chairperson, Pat Griffin, Patsy Sheehan, Jane Gray and Althea Arinaga.
The following Commissioner(s) were absent: Kuuleialoha Santos.
The following staff members were present: Planning Department — Shanlee Jimenez, Myles
Hironaka, Dale Cua; Office of Boards and Commissions — Cherisse Zaima, Teresa Tamura;
Deputy County Attorney Ian Jung.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 3 : 07 p.m.
Council Administrative Assistant Eddie Topenio gave the Oath of Office to new member Althea
Arinaga.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
On the motion by Patsy Sheehan and seconded by Jane Gray to move Unfinished Business
to the end of the meeting, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote,
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
The Minutes of the May 2, 2013 , meeting were approved as circulated.
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS
There were no announcements or general business matters .
COMMUNICATIONS
There were no communications.
August 1, 2013 K.H.P.RC. Meeting Minutes
Page 2
NEW BUSINESS
Re : Class IV Zoning Permit Z4V-2013-17, Project Development Use Permit PDU201345,
. and Use Permit U-201344 to develop a research complex facilitating research in
various dormitory buildings, various accessory structures, and provision for off-street
parking, Tax Map Key: 5-2-013 : 001, Kilauea, Kauai , HawaN = The Resonance
Project Foundation,
The Commission received testimony from Jonathan Chun, representing the Resonance Project,
who stated he was seeking a review on the proposed project at the Kilauea Plantation Manager' s
house. He received comments from the State Historic Preservation Committee and asked if the
Commission had a chance to review them.
Chair Aiu replied they had not received them.
Mr. Chun explained that based on the comments, the client will be making some changes but he
is not certain what those changes are yet. If the Commission has apparent concerns, questions or
comments, Mr. Chun will include those for consideration in the overall redesign or revision.
Chair Aiu asked if Planning Director Mike Dahilig was present to which Mr. Hironaka replied
that he could not make it.
Mr. Chun stated that he is aware that there will be a redesign of the garage portion, though he
does not know what it is going to look like. He has asked the owners to consider the comments
of SHPD (State Historic Preservation Division) which they agreed to do. They also discussed
moving the construction of the underground structure to the second phase. Mr. Chun stated that
SHPD did not comment on that structure and feels it is because they are more concerned about
the renovation of the garage and how it impacts the overall historic context of the garage, wash
house, and main house; those three structures are on their list for historic preservation.
Mr. Long stated that he is aware this is a difficult project with many pieces to it and asked if the
Commission will be reviewing this again to which Chair Aiu added that she thinks it should
come back to the Commission with more detailed information.
Mr. Chun stated that it would be up to the Department and how they schedule it, but he would
support and recommend that it be brought back to the Commission especially if there will be
revisions or amendments.
Mr. Long asked about the dome structure that is partially visible from the house, its purpose,
whether it' s a geodesic dome, and what the significance of the geodesic aspect is.
Mr. Chun explained that the dome structure is going to be a lecture hall which, at one point in
time, had an outdoor deck associated with it; that has since been removed. He noted that they
tried to move it as far down the slope as possible so it would not be visible height-wise; the dome
is 25-feet high to be placed at an elevation 28-feet below the elevation of the maul house. Mr.
' I
August 1 , 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes
Page 3
Chun stated it is a geodesic dome, though he is unsure of its significance. He is encouraging the
client to put some kind of landscaping around it in addition to the elevation change.
Mr. Long asked Mr. Chun to make a note that the Commission is interested in learning about that
when the applicant returns.
Mr. Long also noted that with the proposed agricultural activities there was discussion on four
containers and agricultural sheds, noting that it is a lot proposed for what is a very sensitive
property and core historical resource of Kilauea. He is confident that the architects are
historically competent and hopes they will be sensitive to the aesthetic, historical aspects of the
property.
Mr. Chun stated that is understood and is one of the main reasons they plan to move the dome
lower. He further noted that because the construction of the underground structure is being
moved to a later phase, they need to address the original plan to put in six to eight temporary
storage containers . Although the containers will eventually be incorporated into the underground
structure, if they will not be constructing the underground facility until a later phase, the
containers should not be placed there yet. He further suggested asking for an explanation as to
what purpose the containers will be serving and how long they will be there, as they do not lend
themselves to the historical property.
Chair Aiu asked the Planners to clarify the reason for the prices of rooms and expressed her
concern that this project is a guise for a scientists ' vacation rental.
Mr. Cua explained that his understanding from the pre-application meeting is the applicants will
be operating very similar to what NTBG (National Tropical Botanical Garden) does for their
visiting scientists and botanists who come to do research at their facility. In this case, they will
be hosting visiting physicists to do research by invitation only; it will not be open to the public.
Ms. Griffin asked if the applicant' s were charging, would that be a different permit to which Mr.
Hironaka replied that the Department specifically said there would be no charge to their guests
and that by doing so it would raise the specter of a TVR.
Ms. Griffin highlighted several places in Kilauea that are on the national register such as the
lighthouse, the head bookkeeper and head luna homes, the Kong Lung store, the school and the
plantation manager' s house, which is a very unusual and important structure being made of
stone. She farther noted that oral histories have talked about its creation and that the national
register nominations speak specifically of the full grown trees, extensive lawn that slopes toward
the Kilauea River and a stone cistern which was used by children for swimming. Ms . Griffin
noted that the managers were responsible for a lot of entertaining, which is evident in the house' s
very large living room and kitchen areas as well as the large sweeping lawn. She listed the
numerous proposed structures and their respective square footage, which she feels may
negatively impact the setting for what the house and grounds were. Ms. Griffin asked about the
shade house, stating that it looks as though it is being entirely reconstructed.
August 1 , 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes
Page 4
Mr. Chun stated that it seems to be that way and that all they did was change the walls and put a
form of roof on it.
Ms. Griffin provided some history on shade houses on the island in the 20 ' s and 30 's, noting that
changing the shade house to a walled structure would change the feel of the house and yard,
which is a concern to her. She feels that it is an important responsibility for them to discuss how
the new things work with the historic landscape.
Mr. Chun stated that his understanding is that the Commission would like to encourage the
applicants to further refine the look of the proposed buildings. He feels those are very legitimate
concerns and he will emphasize that to his clients.
Ms. Griffin asked for clarification on ownership of the property and whether they were paying no
tax because of historic preservation credit or non-profit status; she noted that Wicklewood, the
owners listed on the property tax, is a for-profit entity.
Mr. Chun stated that he is unsure of their tax status, but surmised that because Resonance Project
is the long-tern lessee, they qualify for the real property tax exemption as an owner of the
property, and because they are a non-profit organization they are probably getting the tax break
based on that; not the historic preservation credit.
Mr. Long stated that although he has not studied the plans in-depth, his gut feeling is that there is
a lot of new construction happening in a very small area and it' s not just the physical,
architectural structure being impacted. Based on these concerns, he questioned how all this will
be done.
Chair Aiu requested a motion for the applicants to return to the Commission with more detailed
plans and a presentation, which Mr. Chun stated he will try to arrange; further adding he will
provide pictures of what is being proposed.
Mr. Long requested the Architect be present as well.
Ms. Griffm commented that she thinks it important to include how at least two of the new
structures would compromise the setting of the lawn and adversely impact the historic property.
Mr. Long noted that this is also being brought before the Planning Commission and he's sure
there are concerned individuals in- the community who would benefit from a visual presentation.
Mr. Chun stated that the Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for August 13 at which time
the revisions will be presented and public testimony will continue; they will not be asking the
Planning Commission to take any action so there will be time for the applicants to come back to
this body.
Ms. Sheehan agreed with Ms. Griffin and shared her additional concern about some of the old
trees that she feels are very significant. She asked how they fit into the scale of what is being
August 1 , 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes
Page S
done and further mentioned that she hopes no trees will be pulled out just to put up a building.
She is also concerned about what the building will turn into, noting that the footprint could be the
same but the inside could be changed. She commented on the significance of the stairs and the
rooms and feels the Commission could learn a lot more from another presentation.
Mr. Chun stated that some trees are noted, but if there are others that the Commission would like
to preserve, they can let him know and he will go back and check whether there are any plans for
those.
On the motion by Pat Griffin and seconded by Patsy Sheehan to have the Resonance
Project return with more specific plans that address the concerns of the Commission and
the State Historic Preservation Division, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
RE : Kaumuali'i Highway Damage Repairs at Hanapepe River Bridge, Project No. HWY-
KM-2013-06, District of Waimea, Island of Kauai, Hawaii = State ofHawai`i,
Department of Transportation, Highways Division.
Fred Reyes of the Department of Transportation Highways Division updated the Commission on
the plans to repair the 1938 Hanapepe Bridge. He provided copies of photos and plans and
explained how the bridge was damaged by a drunk driver back in 2009, extensively detailing the
extent of the damage and what the repair work will entail .
The Commission received testimony from Dorothea Hayashi of Hanapepe who stated that they
always knew that bridge was dangerous and asked Mr. Reyes whether the concept for this bridge
could be used to strengthen the 1911 bridge.
Mr. Reyes stated that they are not strengthening the bridge; they are repairing damage to the rail,
noting that the two bridges have different types of railing.
Mr. Jung stated for clarification that one is a State bridge and one is a County bridge, and the
engineers from those agencies will work on their respective bridges .
Ms . Griffin stated that there is a Committee started by the State DOT that is doing an inventory
of all State and County bridges, and suggested they use the historical inventories as a guide to
when the railings were established to determine whether or not to go back to KHPRC and SHPD
with a repair possibility; if it is from an earlier bridge, it' s important to replace it in-kind.
A member of the public asked whether the 1938 bridge was registered State Historic register or
Kauai to which Ms. Griffin replied she does not believe it is registered with either but it is
eligible and will be considered in the same way as if it were a historic bridge.
On the motion by Pat Griffin and seconded by Jane Gray to concur with SHPD on the
Hanapepe bridge repair work, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote,
August 1. 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes
Page 6
Re: NEW Taro House (Gaylord Wilcox)
TMK: 5-4-03 : 1
Hanalei, Kauai, Hawaii
Complete Demolition of House and Sheds.
Ms. Sheehan recused herself from this portion of the meeting.
Roger Decamp, General Contractor representing Gaylord Wilcox, stated that he is seeking a
demolition pen-nit for an old, local shack located on Wilcox Trust property across from Hanalei.
Liquor store. He clarified that this property has mistakenly been identified as the Miiki house
and provided an explanation of where the Miiki house actually is based on information received
from Hanalei residents. He stated that this shack is destroyed, wasted and is a hazard that needs
to be removed.
Chair Aiu asked whether someone was living there as there are a lot of cars on the property.
Mr. Decamp stated that someone is living there but was supposed to move out. He explained the
mother of the woman currently living there passed away in January or February and the woman
was supposed to move out by August; however she just had a baby and was granted an additional
month. He provided photos and gave an overview of the property and the condition of the
structure, noting that he was unsure of its historical significance but believes it was just a local
house built in the 30 ' s .
Ms. Griffin noted that on the historic resource profile, which was done in the 80' s and 90 ' s, calls
it the Miiki Taro house. She asked whether this house is across from the Dolphin Restaurant
near Postcards .
Mr. Decamp replied no, this house is across from Hanalei store which is about two to three
blocks away. He is hoping to speak to Yoshi Harada who stores his taro equipment on the Miiki
Taro house property to try and clarify this information.
Mr. Decamp described how the shack has been added to over the years and how old and rotten it
is, leaving nothing that is salvageable, and commented on a piece of plywood that covers a
cesspool, which is a dangerous situation that needs to be taken care of
Ms . Griffin stated that there are no laws allowing the Commission to stop demolition, but she
would like to explore how to mitigate this loss for the future and asked that pictures be taken.
Mr. Decamp agreed that it should be documented and offered to take more and better pictures .
Mr. Long asked where the historical documents had been reposited to which Mr. Hironaka
replied there are copies in their profile and that could be forwarded to the Kauai Historic
Society. Mr. Long requested along with that, a dimension floor-plan of the original structure.
August 1 , 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes
Page 7
Ms . Arinaga stated that if this is not the Miiki Taro House, perhaps the name should not be used
for this project to which Mr. Decamp replied he would investigate it and try to straighten it out.
On the motion by Pat Griffin and seconded by Jane Gray to accept the demolition request
as stated, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Ms. Griffin further stated that along with that she would like to request that the Planning
Department be provided with archival work that includes the actual name of the house as it' s
been known in the community, photos that give an indication of the structure and its placement
along the highway, and a floor-plan and/or plot-plan that shows the footprint and oral histories as
Mr. Decamp can gather them.
RE : Hanama` ulu Trading Company (Deane B. & Joaquina Abben)
TMK: 3-8-2 : 11
Hanama ` ulu, Kauai , Hawaii
Joaquina Abben representing the Hanama'ulu Trading Company asked that the Commission
accept their proposal for the reconstruction due to fire damage, stating that they would like to
start the construction as soon as possible.
Ms. Griffin asked how long Ms . Abben has owned the property to which Ms. Abben replied her
husband bought the property in 1977. At that time, it was just a big shell and everything was put
in after they purchased the building; it was used as storage for the Bhu` e Plantation for
merchandise they had in their store.
Ms. Gray asked whether the post office was going to reopen.
Ms. Abben explained that the post office is in the process of closing down; however it has to go
to the Federal level and be approved by Congress in order to do so. The Hanama'ulu community
is fighting it as well as residents in Kapa` a, and Wailua Homesteads and Houselots since many
of them utilize the Hanama'ulu post office as opposed to Lihu ` e, which they say has no parking.
On the motion by Stephen Long and seconded by Pat Griffin to accept the plans as
submitted, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
August 1. 2013 K.H.P.KC_ Meeting Minutes
Page 8
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Re: Certified Local Government (CLG) Status
Update on County Ilistoric Resource Inventory project by Anna Marie R.
Grune (Consultant) from the firm of Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.
Anna Grune stated that she works for the firm Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, located in
Honolulu, and has been commissioned to do a survey on Kauai ; focusing on areas — Koloa,
Po ` iptt, Kalaheo, and Lihu`e. They are doing a reconnaissance survey, which consists of taking
photographs of buildings and providing brief descriptions based on the features of the house such
as foundation, cladding, windows, roof and type of materials. She stated that there are many
more properties to be surveyed and the process has become much more labor intensive than
originally anticipated. Ms. Grune detailed the process of her data collection.
Ms . Sheehan asked if they were looking at any old inventories to which Ms. Grune replied that
since the inventory they looked at was so old, they are essentially starting from scratch. Ms.
Grune explained how they are using the ARC GIS global positioning system to map out where
the properties are and how it is beuig compiled into a database.
Ms . Sheehan asked for clarification on what they do if they find a house that is 35 years old and
then has been added on to .
Ms . Grune stated that those are being documented as well and gave some examples of how that
is done.
Ms . Sheehan asked what the timetable is in terms of months to which Ms . Grune replied they are
doing the survey portion in a little over a week and then a report will be done.
At the request of Mr. Long, Don Hibbard and. Ms . Grune explained the definitions of some
abbreviations, further explaining that they will all be detailed in the final report.
Mr, Long asked whether any additional information will be provided for the structures that have
been deemed no good or ineligible to which Mr. Hibbard replied no .
Ms . Grune elaborated by stating that areas that require more work and more historic research will
be documented.
In response to Ms . Griffin, Ms. Grune explained the deliverables to the Planning Department will
include a database of the survey information, GPS coordinates and information on the property
along with photographs, as well as a contextual study.
Ms . Griffin asked if it will be available online.
August 1 , 2013 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Minutes
Page 9
Mr. Hironaka replied that he thinks SHPDs intent is for this to be used in a GIS system, so it will
be formatted for that purpose. He further mentioned that SHPD will have to review the
consultant' s report prior to it being submitted to Planning.
Ms. Grune added that their whole scope of work had to be approved by SHPD and the National
Park Service.
There was discussion between Ms. Griffin and Ms . Grune on documenting historically
significant or unique elements of a property such as landscaping, lava rock archways, intricate
Japanese gardens, hollow tile designs and windows.
Mr. Long asked how the survey coordinates with the Planning Department' s permitting check
system.
Mr. Hironaka explained that if the database provided by the consultants is in Excel or Access, it
can easily be put into a GIS system and be configured to allow the planners to look at what type
of permits have been issued for the property, the history of the property, as well as historical
information.
Ms. Sheehan noted that the K61oa area has many cultural things like stone walls and trees and
asked if they are surveying those as well.
Ms. Grune replied that they are only doing houses, but if they do see something they feel is of
historical significance, they will photograph it. She noted some of the other properties they are
working on such as. the Kilauea gym and Wilcox Hospital.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS
The next meeting was scheduled on September 5, 2013 .
Ms. Griffin pointed out that some agenda items that were on the June agenda were not on this
agenda and asked what the reason was for that, specifically the Parks and Recreation item on the
Hanalei Courthouse.
Mr. Jung explained that the Planning Commission had already taken action on that item, adding
that it could be placed on next meeting' s agenda for discussion, but that the permit had already
been approved.
Ms . Griffin shared that she and Mr. Long had attended Section 106 training.
Mr. Hironaka reported that Mike Gushard of SHPD, who was to do a presentation on CLG
funding, was unable to get a flight to Kauai today.
August 1, 2013 K.H.P.RC. Meeting Minutes
Page 10
Mr. Long shared additional information on his experience at the Section 106 training. He asked
if the Commission would like to acknowledge and thank the County government and the Mayor
for sending them to the training and reaffirming their position to support the Section 106 process.
Mr. Hironaka added that SHPD and the National Park Services should also be acknowledged.
Mr. Jung stated that they could send a thank you letter and could delegate authority to the Chair
to issue it.
Chair Aiu stated that Mr. Long could write it and she would sign it.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Cherisse Zaima
Commission Support Clerk
Date:
{ ) Approved as circulated.
{ ) Approved with amendments. See minutes of meeting.
?f
I HAWAII Ken K, Hayashida, P.E.
srAucruRAL roaehssc ENGINEERS Michael P. Hunnemann, P.E.
August 14, 2013
Michael Dahilig, Planning Director
County of Kauai Planning Department
4444 Rice Street, Suite 473
Lihue, Hawaii 96766
Attention : Mr. Myles Hironaka
Subject: KHPRC Meeting, September 5 , 2013
Kapaia Swinging Bridge Repairs
Dear Mr, Dahilig,
KAI Hawaii , Inc . respectfully requests to be placed on the September 5, 2013 Kauai Historic
Preservation Review Committee (KHPRC) meeting agenda to present to the Commission our
plan for the partial repair of the timber Kapaia Swinging Bridge . The presentation is proposed
by the consultant team that is representing the Department of Public Works, County of Kauai.
The purpose of the project is to remove the damaged main support towers from the bridge piers
and construct new, in-kind piers that will utilize the same size and shape of timber members as
what currently exists , None of the other damaged members of the bridge are to be replaced as
part of this project. The replacement of those members will be in a subsequent project.
Attached please see our design plans for this repair.
Thank you for the opportunity to present information about this project to KHPRC. Should you
have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
j
Michael Hunnemann
KAI Hawaii, Inc .
(808) 791 -3980
31 North Pauahi Street, Second Floor * Honolulu x Hawaii * 96817
Telephone: (808) 533-2210 * Facsimile: (808) 533-2686 * E-mail Address: mail alkaihawau.com �
SEA' 0 5 2013
I
I
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
COUNTY OF KAUAI
� By r��"'1 n i
H A N A L E CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS
I
FOR
r ;M1, K A U ` x,a AII: AUMe�', tl� KAPAIA SUSPENSION. BRIDGE
SITEL°CATION
A I M E A EMERGENCY REPAIRS
LIH UE
� � 6 r w,
ia:
wnn u..
esA,a A.rri
e..
Ps[VGa �� Main% .
K` 0 0 A LIHUE , KAUAI , HAWAII
PLANS PREPARED BY: I
KAI HAWAII , INC .
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
I
I
SHEET N0. DESCR[PTION
i /�<�as Lam¢ \
``� �-''L -_-_J� T-1 TITLE SHEET
,�o0 aA wf��� MANAMAUIU
L /j�1� �� �; BEACH PARK S-1 GENERAL NOTES
S-2 BMP PLAN AND DETAILS
it 1i`�w`w S-3 BRIDGE LAYOUT PLAN, DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION AND DETAILS
I PROJECT S-4 NEW TOWER ELEVATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
I LOCATION OALCOK
f r]]r)IIAEMORIAL
NOT TO SCALE HOSPITAL
I
UTA SI �z(/ I
111111�f.'!n�J] jJJ]—LJJ—An�u� r�-
LHUE AIRPORT
I I f l
1
Y a I V )
s m¢ in a a.
a
' Y oW wo 01
Im 4 Zl>- Z
o aU < g '�
ZF DOW
5 � Nww
It (�
R <
a a
W
r] gg
M
y 5 ,. .
o
:s
a
e 9e
an
If In
pre a ��
_° _� .. s z 14, Ill
'Sl�n < w �t2 � � _ a z = o gns
E m
� ��„ y� ga c'S 3:iUN Z .1
iz <=Sp'i<n in <v. .. z >- Y 'm'n'< �'z`e oum o of ?C CA
]: bg rLL � yKa2< <re9 Y� ; may WWI,
ACA m � y w . .wK7 _' 6� � __ . z
6 � <iT:QQ},ya ���S5V i �043 !.$w��1w6 a u �= Kra yy � (U¢[WO_=Dill y � �_ u � F �md#9„ d <�u � 2Z3 ¢<^gsur v yuKno < =' w4J < lu� V vi
4lJ <` y3ga.„.i i$ n �,y<v w K.f=3, w : _ ' u Ill CIP yy a`5 i�foz�irc r� le F
<JTnk = �v p3-�„i° �u JS o�`g' W < >•" }nY o7 d r� 2 zl `> I s
b>a:' < ° �,� 'm'rir cS z 'x x�a Z m <F < a .
waw
6 a J IS Jet If y�
Utx <-3.M2 m w `� .. ,^n k rX' 4n ` .3 j$ v5r p;� §` r�imz w"Vme
€J u� n 3'Mr � .4 i e w pQ '<-n�`K' vr O ysz gs
VJ Fr
�_ � Ym �%x :o z.'^i z 5 6�z' a a� w :LL9'm_5- .,`$, °�'igY o,� mT<y`}3 �`_ -
'lvS. ^ n 5 : lac{ = oot < €: ar
�z Yo G k'q .: va�. 32,�.i _ < p y<Ncp oz
: ,°z< m n o�. rye g
If W
vi
zoo n - zR r. „� A % k J, QF- OF A " i < Gg ty w< m go � '- <'S° t �yl' 3 „s - gc{ raIi
3 A Yz #o w - z �l� " e < W F9 �o�o,°Y1• w �SY
W } < c k ' gg °;=,'rs rg u, m3 W. WWA =°czK J% m <+ _ i.>;� <,
F ,9'S r ' Op y3 gg0 Y, u F 5 Y i N r 6 # (.?Y<S' mSl •� � < E.,°pStwFY
3oox czs �m k5 E n a '� o � '< . W2 < 'm$ c vs,..',6„ <
d � f, y w < mi? c '• Y { . o-r ma r , > �'j s z j:l 1A 41.o i i�.j �. ,, s " iFOaa C'5;' r `� ," '^0 7 ]S"�'-' .. `_^i3z< < < '�81'. _ = X�•x51 41
;'$ F <LL= Kz _-�', xz di, h - ,m < <LL o." k s 3� x ' cTi sc$S <d _, .:acs 3 IC
IIJ�. � _ gg - yak yr `g ati V Jo =� �le�o _ 'z`' 5zK'F' �l „.is3 °z yzuy'gm f�m
` �mm = g3 x 'd ma dE i"<_<_ p? � � K' � c{g " `s mow. ° _ Q� U �w'�jGd ice€^ �FYpF-V ' �m f, k��$j, =�i 3{„<
y' F �i .., w L" x `y^v, R F < % ¢ Z ^_�'. `ar�`-''<�SZ ar"' :'i�Y aC'i' "di0 F - ZiAe�i.III G m en z� ae ;e tm z� € m MM w
ti at atl
k - N m
t4 S = w
c
' xLL. r`r % < ` fi $ = g`F'66ry„zr= y am - 5 d_ d
o2 .°. >^ 6 � fai°sd, ,n, 3° 5 m $s ie &: p �e
J.X of 0 h-m3 gw ,a �k. _ t+.1 a+ < w5oN`5 F : 2 H C E]a�D15 a wt 4n
`¢w' '1- $ ��^w �,. d air;,.: `s IC zg
mar tl,s °«� ttl bFy>�$s ALL. �� ��ea � � �E�to
= maymmm .�RF na^Fc & �o � i "aPR. i � �v�,:f INtmIll
mdjE T-. K 3m mV FW= '�- W F
bW kpi
u in JO ,c y, 5s & s �r �">• �' ti F �nO w �3 m'� 9sm
IC z
'x S` 5' k gym _ Y g � " c X., a b a m IC IN 8 elf I-I
an.dK K$ 2�` r Y $n i . a ` e{ z i' .'
br ow 1. ` '`' i 3 �q Ei�„'z><xYOS ie �+ mO" ze 8< w V•w{E c.fa 'e�
.-'SI` c s 3R E ¢ mr: < y'y `3A � _ . far of ' ,z� rJ�
LLI J3i 23IC �k � <ffi'ml" c JAE .
ti Off
If
°FDP95? G$ s of y < � �,., ° �n c 9<F-, oz R •}, _{ � OY ! N vSf ' °"gi g$all
k „c-' �i X 'p^ 3' S O 3 mmi 5 Ui 8 m o rn�a�am `
°.< `,'c- :tqg= c;n' @ °'^a 4r'3ds z g &A � 8' S d § ^z � q F< gg i � � �` �3 Mm
f� � ;�° 3z a„ '3 m gr xza^_ N � _ x azzLLw r m oz ero�=
almm"_ -W2z �s o '''ff° {�% y�" " 5 ' °„cv_d'y � N z m * °a° 'sP',.ris b - o� y"='us=
L ° § = " a =� o�m x E z^ mow _ F _I.
rc oLL M , W tr�4 0 ,` z .� esi ° p � Z> Cs' E. $ a n IC �mw,,, ° � ..Y`= <W
mai°, ���.'s�..„ $ mpx do < `_.fi9� �} Ma '<' .� `_ 1,1 b..- M S $•:off c, � u '$m 11 yx� =3g4 d= ' °.,' �u.=, 3a zj' _ '<'] fz' � zs 2 F9> • °w ga+k' ' On 'd _ L.- sm m< F '-%' oC
_ y _ Sl S�' LT'r Taus w V �u K z =uNl < v,y S.Yn',e° 2
a I�'� a olgize ? i � �cc�� mur gEl r - I:I i �'s v�'r°.
i~+ .. 'p l'.z3�� g o o't :i o y $v�y,my H !:` " Y PMIA o° 'al �V°,"
znz' s'22 .` 6 mz K8 3tV•e'• ° op„ 3rd ��o. ; :?�� L A - z � nz umw_
z� n9=ye ° a 'aye= ° �p� ban g a � a ys ;�3 ' m - _� � _ i �:e'o
k� ° tea o: ma 'ps9$$ = yYr < < : Tm .
Y LL. mm,z,`, �, .9,ng zk_8^Zr. .�i,t � •°,,� mgw�,z,';-` - _ �o`k`'. 0<2 w - a� <
uos ,ya - zo _� y > yr:c, z zmoe ` Y °�,�ets ,o.c '��oa <dq <„°-,d �qK'�-'� �.°<§ g �. `�' �` m` J� Lr. � wz' - W�Ig tj
= W y FmW _
gg > 5dv 8sh c' T �°k< 'i^ �s � F.r _ $ m�`4mza;� �i=`m nK � Ewyp�< N,ra,In gd .< m3
C! '1loigo $ ,+ < �� _ Sdg = p gaoP> � i3zN � 7 oil "-' '{ �Z � 3RS a- E
;snKp � z ',6_ Nn ,n '< Ntijq 1-, ^ <o"u°z F '.r �,.�ntt 3a ra,�: SSzmz F "' a 6' .a_..z_, ...W� z& , .
UNr.. a3 �.z Ttifh <m,:L"Ca< Fwd �` °l $5�'t- ova I'l
9J ��'�$` p �9°F�<.(.�. 0 gF �`� b =U zyg{�.�z.. ��r{S�'��'.wc� da''�eex]°���� �6`pYzy' $ < ��g�' sz$ Ell � �yLL�S`W<'i':y � o
q Cd t Gc75F rl azS sC��'s �< am ri i'HL'' ¢ a , cU^!NU KX' � < " d Ut.1 dm < F°= _
° _F r 4 Illo .t oaaaaa L^��cs � § y<=,'O.° � ., .s '�'o ` Y..r °owt �` :i� 'ro° 5, , a''o°vm��
asp � � i �a ,z� s x_e� g �� � =a_rv � a¢ *a. x� € ?� <W d
91 < m <a n t I.- ,. r, - 1 m as n ,.. u r , { , t ti c 1
3
EAISMS rMLE
4NOW iiit
1 BRIDGE LAYOUT PLAN
S-3 SCALE: 1 /9" or 1' -0"
} TO%%R N0. 2
21 - -Y
PRR 2 PFA �._
tfmfR No, 2
E)V.ING CALVE
ANCHOR (LOOK ENSIDN:
PER .1
2 DOWNSTREAM BRIDGE ELEVATION
S -3 SCALE: 1/8" = l' -0"
EXIST
SLISPEIJ" SPAN _•..
SPIN
EXIST :Ys C*BLZS -
I
r
iNSU1I cneLCs
PILR 2 "��i� T�✓S %�.5v
f
STEW
SCI¢K NO, 1
�IX6NC
Plot 1
_ �— ENSiRK: cAPA.F.
ANCHOR BLOCK
CMI w BNBf€
FOIRt]AJON
YXISIING CAH.E
AYOIOR CLOCK
wtr COUNTY 'OF KAUAI
PL Kf DEPARWENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
s
woFmo,r 4 KAP M SUSPENSION BRIDGE
EMERGENCY REPAIR
BRIDGE LAYOUT PLAN, DOWNSTREAM
ELEVATION AND DETAILS
Lihue. Kuuui. Huwuii u
room wkm,r "AM 3