HomeMy WebLinkAbout 01/31/2013 Housing & Transportation Committee Workshop minutes re Poipu Parking COUNTY COUNCIL .,5 -° OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
Jay Furfaro,Chair Of`
Nadine K.Nakamura,Vice Chair rr
I`�'` "' } Ricky Watanabe,County Clerk
s
Tim Bynum ? q. Jade K.Fountain-Tanigawa,Deputy County Clerk
Gary L.Hooser '�"/4
Ross Kagawa \,.‘.p.> T'OAR 1S f Telephone(808)241-4188
Mel Rapozo Fax (808)241-6349
JoAnn A.Yukimura Email cokcouncil @kauai.gov
Council Services Division
4396 Rice Street,Suite 209
Lihu`e,Kauai,Hawai`i 96766
MEMORANDUM
May 8, 2013
TO: Jay Furfaro, Council Chair
and Members of the Kaua`i County Council
FROM: JoAnn A. Yukimura, Housing & Transportation Committee Ch. r
RE: JANUARY 31, 2013 HOUSING & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT: PO`IPU PARKING WORKSHOP
On January 31, 2013, the Housing & Transportation Committee held a
non-decision making informational Committee Workshop at The Shops at
Kukui`ula, to bring together stakeholders in the Po`ipu-Koloa area to learn about
best practices in parking management and policies and to discuss possible solutions
for parking problems in the Po`ipu Resort area. The workshop was facilitated by Jim
Charlier of Charlier Associates, Inc. who was the consultant for the
2006 Koloa-Po`ipu Area Circulation Plan, as well as the recently completed County
of Kaua`i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan.
Attached for Council information is a summary report submitted by
Mr. Charlier that includes a summary of the identified parking problems, overview
of breakout group presentations, recommended next steps, and additional
considerations and comments from Mr. Charlier.
A copy of the summary report of the January 31, 2013 Housing &
Transportation Committee Workshop is available electronically (located on your
computer V: drive, MINUTES folder) and in the Council Services Office for your
review. This summary report will be submitted for your approval at the
May 15, 2013 Committee Meeting.
The Housing & Transportation Committee wants to thank Council Chair
Furfaro and the Council Staff for their support of this new format of information
gathering and public outreach. We would also like to thank Po`ipu Beach Resort
Association for their assistance, Stacie Chiba, and The Shops at Kukui`ula for the
generous donation of venue and assistance with coordinating the workshop, and
Living Foods Market & Cafe for the provision of refreshments.
YS:aa
Attachment
cc: May 15, 2013 HT Committee Meeting Agenda
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 1
A workshop was held in Po`ipu on January 31, 2013 that was attended
by about forty (40) people, including Council Chair Jay Furfaro, Housing &
Transportation Committee Chair JoAnn A. Yukimura, Committee Vice Chair
Gary L. Hooser, Councilmember Tim Bynum, Councilmember Ross Kagawa,
Council staff, County Administrative personnel, residents, business and
property owners, and others. A sign-in list from the workshop is attached as
Appendix A.
Jim Charlier, Charlier & Associates, was present to facilitate the
workshop. Mr. Charlier was the consultant for the 2006 Koloa Po`ipu Area
Circulation Plan and the Kaua`i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan. Prior
to the workshop, Mr. Charlier's firm conducted an online survey, which a
summary is attached as Appendix B. During the workshop, Mr. Charlier
presented a PowerPoint presentation that included possible long-term and
short-term solutions, which is attached as Appendix C.
Attendees of the workshop were asked to divide into five (5) breakout
groups following the presentation. The groups were given approximately one
hour to identify the top issues regarding parking in Po`ipu, three (3) possible
short-term solutions and three (3) possible long-term solutions. A summary
of the breakout group presentation is attached as Appendix D.
This memorandum offers observations about the parking issue along
with potential next steps based on the workshop discussion.
OVERVIEW
A few overarching points from the workshop are emphasized here:
• The upcoming update of the Koloa-Po`ipu-Kalaheo area Community
Development Plan (CDP) represents an important opportunity for
area stakeholders. Any access or circulation projects or programs
that stakeholders would like to see completed in the future — a
transit circulator, bike lanes on Po`ipu Road, sidewalks on area
streets, and completion of Hapa Trail as a non-motorized corridor
linking Po`ipu to Koloa, etc. — should be identified, mapped and
prioritized in the CDP. This is critically important. Stakeholders
should not assume the CDP will automatically incorporate all of the
recommendations of the Koloa-Po`ipu Area Circulation Plan.
Stakeholders should recognize that anything not identified, mapped
and prioritized in the CDP may be unlikely to happen for many
years.
• The Koloa-Po`ipu area is one of several areas on Kaua`i where
lodging and tourism activities are concentrated. The
Hanalei-Princeville area on the North Shore is the most obvious
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 2
similar situation (although different in many ways, too). The
County should weigh the merits of potential policies, programs, and
projects in the Koloa-Po`ipu area in the context of being precedents
or prototypes for what might be done in other areas.
• Kaua`i County is a rural place with a small population and as a
result the County budget is limited. Needs of the resident
population will be difficult to meet, especially given the expected
reduction in the flow of Federal funds to Hawai`i. Tourism is a
major source of employment and income and is the island's most
important industry. However, the unique needs specific to tourism
areas will be impossible to meet entirely with County general
funding. It is reasonable for the County to guide and encourage its
resort destination areas in the formation of districts or p artner
organizations to share in the funding and management of localized
needs related to tourism.
• Land uses, resorts, businesses and home owners in the Koloa-Po`ipu
area are part of a tourism region with a high level of
interdependence and intertwined economics. While there are a few
shopping districts along and near Po`ipu Road, the destination
appeal of the resort area depends significantly on the authentic
plantation town vibe of Koloa Town. Koloa Town itself benefits
from proximity to the resort lodging and vacation homes with the
resulting demand for shopping and dining. Today the area appears
significantly to be thriving. But it will grow and change g y in the
out.future as approved development projects bu it dou t This g rowth
will demand a proactive approach to addressing access and
circulation needs. The effectiveness of such efforts would be
significantly enhanced if the area could pull together and work
cooperatively across localized geographic boundaries and business
sectors.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 3
SUMMARY OF THE PARKING PROBLEM
• The existing "parking problem" identified by area stakeholders
includes vehicles parked along Po`ipu Road primarily in three
general areas.
o Just north of the roundabout, visitors patronizing Outfitters
Kaua`i park along Po`ipu Road across from the small strip
center and are shuttled to various daytime activities by the
tour operator, including kayak trips, zip-lining, paddle
boarding, downhill bicycling, whale watching boat trips, and
so forth. The problem is exacerbated by the relatively small
amount of parking for the shops in the strip center, which
encourages shoppers to park along the street. Parking along
the east side of Po`ipu Road at this location has been
"improved" at some point in the past (see photo). An area of
the
shoulder k, - ,
has been V`\ 4
widened "
and
stripes �.
have been -
painted in
an f
attempt
to organize the parking. However, vehicles are being parked
on the dirt behind the striped paving and many are parked at
odd angles, which reduces the effectiveness of the pavement
markings. Some sight lines for parking drivers are obscured
by vegetation. Finally, pedestrians crossing the street are at
risk from vehicles exiting the roundabout.
o Near Po`ipu Shopping Village, employees of shops in the
Village and the nearby Koa Kea Hotel & Resort park along
Po`ipu Road during the day and customers of the restaurants
park there during the evening. This spillover problem
appears to be related to limited parking supply within the
shopping center, popularity of the shops and restaurants
located there, and the lack of parking for Koa Kea Hotel &
Resort employees. Parking occurs on both sides of Po`ipu
Road,
near the . w �_,
west and i.r 7:1111100' ' 4
.:, , stiiii ctrk,
east rE
COYS PCSRi1 6.#R dk(d8l '� a.•
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 4
entrance to the three (3) resorts in the area, generating
pedestrian crossings at Kiahuna Plantation Drive. There is a
crosswalk across Po`ipu Road at this location but no
sidewalks on either Kiahuna Plantation Drive or on Po`ipu
Road. The roadside parking is informal and unpaved (see
photo). On weekdays in January 2013, there were about
twenty (20) cars parked in the right-of-way at this location.
Impacts include visual blight and safety issues associated
with pedestrian crossings and parking maneuvers.
o Near the Grand Hyatt Kaua`i Resort & Spa (Grand Hyatt),
employees park in the Po`ipu Road right of way on both sides
of the street. Based on discussion with Grand Hyatt
management and comments made at the workshop, this
appears to be "for convenience" of employees rather than
because of a parking shortage within the hotel site.
Apparently there was a dirt parking lot on the mauka side of
Po`ipu Road for a while that was used by Hyatt employees,
but that was closed due to the County requiring permits that
would make the improvements too costly. Most parking on
the
makai
side of .:; ;
Po`ipu °
Road is
formal, t
paved
and
"official.,, z5s
Parking
on the mauka side is informal and unpaved, although heavily
used. Because parking on the mauka side requires
pedestrian crossings of Po`ipu Road to access the Grand
Hyatt, there is a pedestrian safety issue at this location. (See
photo.) This roadside parking also negatively impacts the
visual aesthetics of the otherwise beautiful entrance to the
Grand Hyatt.
• Each of these areas is different enough from the others to warrant
different approaches, although the County should act within an
overall, integrated and comprehensive policy approach. Overall,
the County should regard the safety issues associated with
pedestrian crossings as a high priority. The increased potential for
vehicular crashes along Po`ipu Road related to vehicle maneuvers in
and out of the informal, unpaved roadside areas should also be a
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 5
concern. Although the road is posted for twenty-five miles per hour
(25 mph), many vehicles travel at higher speeds than that,
something that is encouraged by the rural design of the roadway.
Finally, negative impacts to visual character of Po`ipu Road are not
insignificant. (See discussion of Po`ipu Road Corridor below.)
• Implementation of "no parking" areas along Po`ipu Road could
presumably "solve" the problem in the areas of the Grand Hyatt
and the Po`ipu Shopping Village. However, routine enforcement
would be required (see below for more discussion of enforcement.)
Also, as discussed later in this memorandum, prohibiting parking
along Po`ipu Road in the Po`ipu Shopping Village area could affect
Village businesses, since adequate parking is not available on site.
The problem in the area north of the roundabout seems more
intractable and might require an approach with multiple elements.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 6
WALKING AND BICYCLING
• Resort regions across the Country (and the World) have begun to
feature walking and bicycling in a way that moves beyond
organized "recreational activities." Terms like "walkable place" and
1 "pedestrian village" are now part of marketing for countless resorts
and resort towns. Many destinations promote bicycling, not as an
"adventure," but as a convenient, enjoyable way to move around the
resort area. The trend is that visitors and tourists are choosing
destinations where they can be active in simple ways — walking to
breakfast, bicycling to a shopping district, or simply going for a
stroll.
• If the Koloa-Po`ipu area is to be competitive as a vacation
destination, fundamental improvements in the caliber of the
walking and bicycling environment will be required. The Po`ipu
Road corridor represents an untapped opportunity in this respect,
as does the historic Hapa Trail. Many of the shopping centers,
restaurants, hotels, beaches and homes in the Koloa-Po`ipu area are
within easy walking distance of each other. Today, however,
walking — particularly safe walking for trips of more than a few
hundred feet — is almost completely unavailable within the area.
Sidewalks are intermittently available, but poorly connected. Many
sections of Po`ipu Road have no sidewalks or crosswalks.
• Walking is a choice activity. To quote Yogi Berra, "If the people do
not want to come out to the ballpark, nobody is going to stop them."
Providing for an active pedestrian environment requires more than
sidewalks. Generally, four (4) criteria must be met: the pedestrian
environment must be useful, safe, comfortable and interesting.
Meeting these criteria requires integrating walk facilities
(sidewalks, crosswalks, walkways) with streets and traffic, transit,
and abutting land uses. The walk environment must bestow
elevated and preferred status on pedestrians. Once a significant
number of people are out and about in the public spaces, that
attracts even more people.
• "Nobody will walk here; it is too hot." Anyone subscribing to this
point of view has not watched tens of thousands of people walking
around World Showcase Lagoon at Epcot Center in Orlando, in
Florida's humid heat, all summer long, year after year or walking
the Blue Track between the villages of Italy's Cinque Terra in
sweltering Y
Mediterranean humidity. The walk distances in these
world-class destinations (among many others) are similar to the
separations between many places in the Koloa-Po i p u area make it
useful, safe, comfortable and interesting and people will walk much
farther than we expect.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 7
• The vacation resort activity enjoying the most explosive growth
today is bicycling. From tourism oriented bike share systems
(Boulder CO, Washington DC, Seville SP, Paris FR, Honolulu HI,
among hundreds of others) to hotels providing free bikes for use by
guests (common throughout the US), to California and Florida
beach towns with their ubiquitous fleets of cruiser bikes, bicycling
has gone mainstream and is no longer just for the fit and brave.
While there are existing "tours" that haul people in vans up
Waimea Canyon for the downhill ride back to the van that is a tiny
part of the potential market. Koloa-Po`ipu could offer something
much more appealing and valuable — the opportunity to bicycle
safely and conveniently, directly from a condo or hotel room without
having to drive to a trailhead. Again, Po`ipu Road could play a key
role in making this possible.
• Resorts often believe that the best business model is to provide
everything the visitor needs on site. But that is going against the
market. Today the most successful destinations are places where
people are out and about and mingling, with convenient walk and
bike access to shopping, dining, beaches, and other daily activities.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 8
TRANSIT
• Another common feature of destination resort regions is convenient
local transit for circulation within the area. The immediate goal
usually is not to replace rental cars, although reduced rental car
volumes eventually can be one measure of success. Rather, the goal
normally is to enhance the quality of the visitor experience while at
the same time providing convenient transportation for employees.
As with walking and bicycling, transit has become one of the
fundamentals that successful destinations provide and highlight in
their marketing. The Koloa-Po`ipu area could be ideal for a
circulator, due to the orientation of the area roadways and the
proximity of multiple destinations. This opportunity was described
in more detail in the 2007 Koloa-Po`ipu Area Circulation Plan.
• Although there is a recent private sector initiative to provide
transit service from the airport to Po`ipu, that will be a difficult
market to serve well. Why would someone ride a bus to the resort if
one of the first things they need upon arrival is a car? Many
regions have found that starting with local circulation and moving
out from there works better. Rental cars are generally necessary
for many of Kaua`i's visitors, but the amount of value conferred for
the price is only modest. For example, most visitors come with
families and/or friends. While they share many activities, they also
go different directions at times. One person will be golfing, another
shopping, and others kayaking. One rental car cannot serve all of
these needs. The availability of local transit circulation is an
addition to the list of guest services more than it is a replacement
for a rental car.
• Some resorts in Hawai`i operate shuttles specifically for their own
guests. For example the Starwood properties on West Maui operate
a shuttle system to high volume destinations —primarily a couple of
popular local luaus and downtown Lahaina. These are operated as
guest shuttles and are not used by employees. However, this
approach is expensive and difficult for any but the largest resorts to
accomplish. A more feasible approach is to coordinate service to
multiple destinations, funded from multiple sources in some sort of
partnership arrangement.
• The Kauai Bus (TKB) is an efficient, public transit system operated
by Kauai County. It has grown rapidly in its short life. It could
play a variety of roles in providing a Koloa-Po`ipu circulator. TKB
could operate a circulator as a County transit service— part of the
island transit system. Since the Agency already exists, with
established contracting, operations, maintenance and related
capabilities, a Koloa-Po`ipu circulator could be integrated readily
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 9
into the network, with significant operational efficiencies.
However, the recently completed Multimodal Land Transportation
Plan determined that transit demand in Kaua`i will grow rapidly
in the coming decades and the County will be challenged to meet
the demand, given funding constraints. With over-capacity
commuter routes already strained by surging demand, the County
would find it difficult to fund a new resort area circulator out of
County general funds.
• Other possible approaches would include having the County
contract (through The Kaua`i Bus) with a private sector operator,
which would offer a means of avoiding the capital cost of new public
buses by incorporating those costs into the contract. Another option
would be for a Koloa-Po`ipu area special district or partnership to
contract for service by a private operator, although no suitable
district or partnership exists currently. In any service scenario the
funding issue would have to be addressed and probably would
require private sector participation.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 10
PARKING MANAGEMENT
• Po`ipu Road is under County jurisdiction and the County has the
authority to prohibit parking in roadside areas based on safety,
congestion or visual blight reasons — all of which are present to
some degree in this corridor. Prohibiting parking, however, would
give rise to new issues, including:
o To be effective, "no parking" areas along Po`ipu Road would
require steady, routine enforcement. Under the existing
County organizational structure, parking enforcement would
be the responsibility of the Police Department. It would be
difficult for the police to give parking enforcement high
priority or even routine attention, given budgetary
constraints and community needs.
o One possible way to discourage parking in roadside areas
(and reduce enforcement needed) would be to introduce.
barriers using natural materials (rocks work well). These
would have to be set back from the road for safety.
o For the area along the Grand Hyatt, restricting parking
along Po`ipu Road (outside of designated areas) might be
feasible as a stand-alone strategy (with enforcement). But in
the area along Po`ipu Shopping Village and in the area near
the Kaua`i Outfitters (north of the roundabout), simply
prohibiting parking in the street right-of-way might create
unintended consequences, including potential business
impacts. There could be opposition to this approach. Many
of the elements described in this memorandum (walk and
bike accommodation, transit service, etc.) could play a role in
mitigating these business impacts. For example the Po`ipu
Shopping Village restaurants would be a logical destination
for circulator shuttle service. But these might take years to
implement.
o In the area north of the roundabout, where aesthetic impacts
are perhaps not as urgent as in the section of Po`ipu Road
east of the roundabout, it might be possible to simply
improve the informal parking on the east side of the street
(pave, drain, stripe) and provide a crosswalk for pedestrians
along with appropriate road signs. However, this could be
seen as a precedent: if we provide formal on-street parking
in one area, why not in another?
o These will be hard choices to make in the absence of a long-
term vision or plan for Po`ipu Road. Do we envision this as
an urban street with storefronts and on-street parking or as
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 11
a scenic semi-rural road with green setbacks on both sides of
the road? Do we anticipate turning Po`ipu Road into a four-
lane or six-lane highway? Should we add sidewalks, or
multiuse pathways parallel to the street? Would we ever
install urban drainage (curb, gutter and pipes) or do we want
to preserve the semi-rural look? The need for a coherent
vision and plan for Po`ipu Road is discussed more in the next
section.
o It might be possible for a formal resort district entity to
provide funding for parking enforcement, or even to
undertake parking enforcement directly through an
agreement with the County. This would make the most
sense if the resort district was also directly addressing
transit service needs and other aspects of an integrated
multimodal approach to providing for the area's access and
circulation needs.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 12
PO`IPU ROAD CORRIDOR
• Po`ipu Road is a scenic corridor stretching from Koloa Town
through the Po`ipu area and serving as the "front door" for many
businesses, resorts, hotels, golf courses and homes. The appearance
and functionality of this "county road" are critically important to
the future of the area. One has only to look at the
Wailua-Waipouli-Kapa'a area on the East Side for an example of
how increased traffic and lack of design intervention can impact the
visual character and "windshield appeal" of a resort region. A
question for area landowners and businesses might be: In the
future, will Po`ipu Road add or subtract value from abutting lands
and businesses?
• The Koloa-Po`ipu Area Circulation Plan (KPACP) completed in
2007 did not recommend adding multi lanes to Po`ipu Road, relying
instead on a multimodal package of projects and programs with an
emphasis on improved connectivity across all modes. Today Po`ipu
Road is a two-lane street with turn lanes at intersections. East of
the roundabout, a wide right-of-way is available for possible
expansion, and eventually the County will be asked to consider
widening the street to four lanes (or more — see next point below).
Note that most of the recommendations in the KPACP have not
been implemented.
• The 2000 Kaua`i General Plan mentions 4-laning of Po`ipu Road
(p. 7-6) as a "needed improvement" although the General Plan does
not specifically call for 4-laning of Po`ipu Road. Given the
development entitled in the Po`ipu area since 2000, the state DOT's
updated traffic modeling will probably again indicate a low level of
service letter grade for Po`ipu Road — perhaps beyond what even
4-laning could accommodate. This will be an issue the County will
have to address in its General Plan Update and in the CDP Update
(currently underway).
• Po`ipu Road should be thought of as a major public asset for the
Koloa-Po`ipu area. It is in the area's interest to have a build-out
corridor plan for this street that implements a vision embodying the
hopes, wishes and ambitions of the area landowners, businesses
and residents, as well as County leadership. In the absence of
proactive planning, the prospects for sidewalks, bike lanes and
transit service will fade, to be replaced by the default outcome of
inexorable road widening. A Po`ipu Road corridor plan should be
prepared either as part of the CDP Update for the area or
immediately following adoption of the CDP.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 13
• Elements of a modern corridor plan include (estimated project cost:
two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000):
o Extensive, collaborative public involvement;
o Development of a clear, compelling vision leading to goals
and objectives;
o Multimodal framework, including complete streets and
future transit;
o Traffic forecasts (although congestion relief is just one among
other goals and there should be no need for expensive traffic
modeling);
o Traffic demand management options, including ridesharing, •
remote parking, commuter and visitor transit, and promotion
of walking and biking;
o Build-out cross section including pedestrian realm, setbacks,
and right-of-way requirements (ten percent (10%) conceptual
design drawings);
o Access Management Plan;
o Areas for formal roadside parking or new surface parking
lots, if any;
o Intersection configuration details for permitted intersections;
and,
o Implementation cost estimates at programming level of
accuracy.
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 14
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS .(Kaua`i County Council and Council
Staff with Support from Administration as needed)
1. Convene next steps workshop with County Council (part of regular
meeting schedule). Invite organizations (PBRA, Malama Koloa,
and others as appropriate) and ask them to offer ideas, desires,
objectives and approaches on behalf of their organizations. Discuss
potential steps suggested below. Modify these steps as appropriate.
2. Interim measures — Po`ipu Road east of intersection with Ala
Kinoiki Bypass Road to just past the Grand Hyatt entrance:
a. Confirm with Department of Public Works (Public Works)
the specific steps involved in posting County road shoulders
for no parking. If action by Council is required, schedule
that. If action can be taken administratively, communicate
request to Public Works and avoid unnecessary Council
actions.
b. Before any physical changes or legal steps are taken,
determine how public notice of any changes will be
communicated.
c. Request that Public Works review and reply back to Council
on possible use of physical barriers in areas to be posted for
no parking.
d. Confer with Police Department about enforcement program
and level of effort.
e. Post Po`ipu Road for no roadside parking except where
formal, designated parking is permitted. Request that Public
Works determine sign placement to ensure current informal
shoulder parking areas are clearly closed to parking.
Implement physical barriers if appropriate.
f. Request Public Works and Police Department to report back
to Council in sixty (60) days concerning implementation and
compliance.
3. Interim measures — Po`ipu Road north of roundabout:
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May, 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 15
a. The general approach recommended here is to continue to
allow parking in the right-of--way on the east side of Po`ipu
Road north of the roundabout as an interim use. The visual
impacts here are important, but less so than further east in
the corridor. The business impacts of closing the roadside to
E es
,I QA
r
wwY
parking, on the other hand, would be potentially significant
for the outfitter and the shops.
b. Request a proposal from Public Works concerning
modification and further improvements to the semi-formal
parking area on the east side of Po`ipu Road across from the
shopping strip. This should include determining where the
right-of-way line is and whether Public Works feels adding a
crosswalk from the parking spaces to the parking lot of the
strip center would improve safety. (There is no sidewalk on
either side of Po`ipu Road at this point in the corridor.) From
on-site observation it looks like there would be a need to
provide deeper parking bays and to provide barriers to
prevent parking behind the paved parking spaces. (See
photo above.)
c. Ask Public Works to clear some of the vegetation blocking
sight lines on the north side of the semi-informal parking
area and also to keep the paint striping reasonably fresh.
d. Finally, there should be some contact between the County
and the businesses in this area to ensure everyone
understands what is happening and why - and that the
businesses are aware of how the private sector could help the
County ensure the area is used as intended and is safe for
their customers.
. ,,,,,,,,
. .. ....... .. ...... . ...
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 16
4. Corridor Plan
a. Program a Po`ipu Road Corridor Plan as a CIP project as
early as possible. If it would be possible to coordinate this
with the CDP Update, that would be ideal. But if not, the
CDP should state that details of the future of Po`ipu Road
will be resolved through a corridor planning process and
amended into the CDP later.
b. Approach the business community in the Koloa-Po`ipu area
for cost participation in the Po`ipu Road Corridor Plan.
c. A preliminary list of tasks for a scope of services for the
Corridor Plan is provided under "Po`ipu Road Corridor,"
above.
d. The parking steps described above should be intended as
interim improvements that ultimately would be replaced or
changed once a Corridor Plan is developed, approved and
implemented. This includes the proposed parking in the
roadside area north of the roundabout. It should be clear
that these are interim improvements, not permanent.
5. District or Partnership
a. There is a need for creation of some entity that can represent
the landowners, businesses and other stakeholders in the
Koloa-Po`ipu area on access and circulation coordination and
implementation. This will be important for the Po`ipu Road
Corridor Plan, but also for implementation of a transit
shuttle.
The district or partnership organization should establish a source for
its own funding. This could either be as a taxing district authorized by the
County or as a membership organization with dues, although the former
would be preferable. What the County needs is an active partner that
represents a reasonable cross section of stakeholders in the area, is actively
engaged in the corridor planning process, is involved in the development of a
transit circulator as called for in the Koloa-Po`ipu Area Circulation Plan
(2007), is active as a transportation demand management organization for
commuting workers, and can provide matching funds for major projects and
programs.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS AND COMMENTS
• Recommended Next Step 2 calls for prohibiting parking in the
Po`ipu Road right-of-way east of the Ala Kinoiki Bypass Road
intersection. This seems a reasonable approach for the area at the
Grand Hyatt because comments offered at the workshop by Hyatt
representatives and others indicated that parking along Po`ipu
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 17
Road tends to be "for convenience" rather than the result of
inadequate on-site parking. However, the situation is different at
Po`ipu Shopping Village. During the week of the parking workshop
in January 2013 there were routinely as many as twenty (20)
vehicles parked in the right-of-way at this location and it is clear
that this occurs because parking demand is greater than the on-site
parking supply. Over the long-term, it should be possible to reduce
parking demand with a Koloa-Po`ipu area transit circulator and
better pedestrian and bicycle provisions along Po`ipu Road.
However, in the short-term it is clear more parking is needed to
support the shops and restaurants in the Village. The
recommendation to prohibit parking in the right-of-way of Po`ipu
Road in the area of the Village (and throughout the corridor east of
the Ala Kinoiki Bypass Road Intersection) was based on safety
concerns for the pedestrian activity associated with informal
parking and the negative impacts of roadside parking on the
character of the area. There may be options for managing this
parking shortage in the short-term. For example, it appears from
aerial photography that land might be available for use to develop
additional parking on the east side of the Village. However, it is
possible this recommendation will be controversial and will be seen
as creating a hardship for the Village businesses.
• Several workshop attendees were interested in the idea of
developing a remote parking location served by a transit shuttle as
a way to reduce parking demand at commercial and lodging sites.
This was not included in Recommended Next Steps (above) because
of concerns about its feasibility as a short-term solution. The
concept would be most viable as a way to reduce on site employee
parking demand at specific destinations like the Grand Hyatt or the
Po`ipu Shopping Village. It would be very difficult to make such a
strategy work for shoppers or other casual visitors. But even for
commuting employees, this would be challenging to implement
successfully. There is no current source of funding either for
development of a parking lot or for operations of a shuttle serving
it. For this to work, shuttle service would have to be frequent and
would have to extend late into the evening — both significant cost
factors. There is no current interaction between employers and
workers relative to employees' commuting needs or habits and no
existing mechanism for routine communication or enforcement.
Over the long-term, remote intercept parking for destinations in the
Po`ipu area could be feasible and should be evaluated as part of the
recommended corridor plan (Next Step 4, above).
J �t F dJ `^��.MSei_�.:c_..2.;s< ,M .-. ... �_ �� .. .� .,...s _.... .�✓.._. ... a r._ -..-...,..2 aem..A .—x .L
Po`ipu Parking Workshop May 8, 2013
Workshop Summary and Next Steps 18
• If parking is prohibited along Po`ipu Road outside of designated
parking areas, routine and rigorous enforcement will be required
for this approach to be successful. Consideration should be given to
these questions;
o Is there an alternative to having County Police provide the
enforcement?
o Do current County ordinances provide for escalating fines for
repeat offenders?
o Do current County ordinances allow for "friendly reminders"
to be given to first-time offenders?
o Are there peak times when enforcement would be most
effective?
Po'ipu Parking Workshop Stakeholder Contact List
January 31,2013
Name Title Company
Adelia Fuller Owner Commercial Property Owner
Amy Esaki First Deputy County Attorney Office of the County Attorney
Barbara Pendragon Housing Planner Housing Agency
Economic Development Specialist IV-
Ben Sullivan Energy Office of Economic Development
Bev Brody Facilitator Get Fit Kaua`i Health&Built Environment
Carolyn Caylor General Manager Po'ipu Kai Association
Celia Mahikoa Executive on Transportation Transportation Agency
Chris Gampon General Manager Outrigger Kiahuna Plantation
Chris Moore Boardmember Koloa Community Association
Chris Steuri General Manager Koa Kea Hotel&Resort
Christina Gabriel General Manager Marriott's Waiohai Beach Club
Danny Aki Human Resources Director Koa Kea Hotel&Resort
Fredy Ramirez Executive Committee Malama Koloa
Gary Hooser Councilmember Kaua`i County Council
Jay Furfaro Council Chair Kaua'i County Council
JoAnn A.Yukimura Housing&Transportation Committee Cha Kaua'i County Council
Jody Kono Kjeldsen Executive Director Po'ipu Beach Resort Association
Ken Posney Owner Koloa Trolley
Kevin Arnold Resident Po'ipu Kai
Lee Steinmetz Transportation Planner Planning Department
Lindsay Crawford Project Manager Kukui'ula Development Company
Lyle Tabata Deputy County Engineer Department of Public Works
Malia Thain Resident
Marie Williams Long Range Planner Planning Department
Mark Domingcil Safety&Security Manager Marriott's Waiohai Beach Club
Marvin Otsuji Owner Kaua`i Seasport
Mike Belles Resident
Mike Tresler Sr Vice-President Grove Farm
Natural-Lee Garcia General.Manager Roy's Po'ipu Bar&Grill
Peter Baldwin Trustee Eric A.Knudsen Trust
/ Rick Haviland Owner Outfitters Kaua'i
7! Rick Shaw Resident
Robert Westerman Fire Chief Kaua'i Fire Department
Roberta Charles Resident
Ross Kagawa Councilmember Kaua'i County Council
Roy Thompson General Manager Kiahuna Beachside-Castle Resorts
Stacie Chiba Marketing Manager The Shops at Kukui'ula
Terry Kamen Resident
Terry Kuribayashi Owner Kukui'ula Store
Tim Bynum Councilmember Kaua'i County Council
Tom Shigemoto Sr Vice-President A&B
NAI Chaney Brooks&Company(Po'ipu Shopping
Valerie L.Roland(5) General Manager Village)
Wally Kudo Dept.of Public Works-Engineering
APPENDIX A
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey
Question #1: I am . . . (check all that apply)
An owner or manager of a business ,.,. 10
in the Koloa-Poipu area
Other interested party 9
A resident of the Koloa-Poipu area 1111118
An owner of land in the Koloa-Poipu
6
area
A visitor or guest from off-island 0
Number of respondents
Total responses = 25
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
Appendix B
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey
2
Question #2: Have you observed parking problems along Poipu
Road and/or Lawai Road?
No
off.'
,a.
Yes,
920o
Total responses = 24
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey 3
Question 3: If you answered yes to question 2, where do parking
problems occur? (check all that apply)
Along Poipu Road near Poipu Shopping
Village 86%
Along Poipu Road near the Marriot
Waiohai and Koa Kea 82%
Along Poipu Road near the Grand
Hyatt 82%
Along Lawai Road near Lawai Beach 55%
Along Poipu Road just mauka of the
roundabout 55%
Along Lawai Road near Prince Kuhio
Park 36%
Along Lawai Road near Kukuiula Boat
Harbor 32%
Along Poipu Road near Poipu Kai and
the intersection with Ala Kinoiki Road 23%
Along Lawai Road near Spouting Horn
Beach Park 18/
Along Poipu Road near Koloa Landing 18%
Percent of respondents who selected each location
Total responses = 22
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey 4
Question #4: Please estimate what percentage of the vehicles
parked alongside the roadways are in each of the following
categories:
Cars parked by employees of
resorts, shops and restaurants 49%
Cars parked by customers of shops
and restaurants 22%
Cars parked by customers of
outfitters and tour companies
16%
Rental cars parked by guests and
other visitors to hotels and resorts 11/
Other I1%
Average of all responses
Total responses = 21
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey 5
Question #5: Please rank the following potential issues in order
of importance to you.
(1 = most important; 4 = least important)
1 Most Important
Average rank of each choice is shown here
Pedestrian safety of people walking
along roads with no sidewalks 1.8
(people who ranked this #1 = 10 )
Traffic safety because of cars 2.1 2
blocking sight lines at intersections
(people who ranked this #1 = 8 )
Impacts to scenic character of the Koloa- 2 8
Poipu area from cars parked along roads
(people who ranked this #1 = 5 )
3
3.2
Impacts to business viability because
of inadequate parking
(people who ranked this #1 = 2 )
4 Least Important
Total responses = 25
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey 6
Question #6: Which of the following potential solutions do you
think would be most effective for solving the parking problems?
(check up to three choices)
Increased parking spaces in new surface lots
60%
away from roadways
New sidewalks, walkways and crosswalks
48%
along Poipu Road
More stringent enforcement of illegal
parking along roadways 48%
A Koloa-Poipu bus transit circulator
connecting destinations within the area 32%
More signs prohibiting parking along
roadways 32%
Other(see below) 28%
Remote parking lot connected to Poipu
destinations by a bus transit circulator 28%
New sidewalks, walkways and crosswalks
16%
along Lawai Road
Percent of respondents who selected each choice
"Other" responses:
• Improved maintenance of public roadside right-of-way for parking purposes
• Make business take care of their employee parking
• Tour co. shuttle customers from their own offsite staging area - work with
landowners who have unused land for parking
• Need accountability by police and business owners
• Proper parking stalls along one side of Poipu Road
• Designated diagonal on street parking in select areas
Total responses = 21
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
Survey Results v2 January 31,2013
Poipu Parking Survey 7
Question #7: What entity do you feel should take the lead in
addressing parking and transportation issues in the Koloa-Poipu
area?
Don't need
an entity for
this—
individual
businesses
and property
owners can
address these
issues
or future County of
organizatio Kauai
54%
"Other current or future organization"suggestions:
• PBRA in partnership with County and stakeholders
• Poipu Beach Association
• Initially County; then depends on solution sought
• All resort and business owners in Poipu
• Individual businesses and County in a partnership
• PBRA
• County of Kaua'i, Community and Holo Holo Shuttle
• Police should ticket people (signs and more parking will not help)
• Should be an effort of all parties concerned
Total responses = 24
Kauai County Council Housing and Transportation Workshop
.. ,,
Aloha
Poi u Parking Workshop
p
..,...,.. ..- ,,,,.,
...
._
, _
4 _.,.. ....
.. .
_ __ __. ...... .,
. _ _ .
. __ _ _ _ ___ . ..
..4,,,,,... . _Y _
b
. , ,
...... , . .
f _
. 4. 4 _ ..
...
. ,
......i. .: . , _
..
y
- gk A ...
R
-J
-. I
-,
'4' r
r ,
43110e1,-: , Virr .
lik
for County of Kauai 1/31/2013
/w /1/\/ .--./ . °11\\aa*
,---...-7-
Charlier Associates, Inc.
J __--L -- ,
. LL_
.. P -:"'-' •:'.-.9* - 7:_._- 4.-4* - 1.." - ' _... - ..iii ,_ -
1
NOIt
PARKIN
.... ,.. .. .,
, _ .s.,
fi PRIVATE .PARKING
SUEOKA'S CUSTOMER PARKING ONLY
I UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES WILL BE
-....'-vim TOYED AWAY
AT DRIVER'S OR OWNER'S EXPENSE
-------- THERE IS A
30 MINUTE TIME ! I " `
FOR PARKING,IN THIS AREA.
,o.
CS
®am
CO 0
■
■
2
, 0 u
1
, 0 .
1 .......
1
a.,)
ro ,
CL-
1
0
CD Z
CIS CD U
Today's Agenda
1 :00 - 2 :00 Presentation
• s
2 :00 • Breakout Groups
3 :00
3 : 30
WARNING
•
CHALLENGES
AHEAD
doLisvoM • £
saiBalea}S ' Z
sanpadsaad . Z
UIfl. flQ uoieuosoJd
L
CD
CD o cu 0
F-- O
N
N
-I—' 4� Q E
C C - F
o
o -1--, - •i or ,r,..41 U QUO 4)
a)
C - - D
LE=EO CU
co
— >
CU (13 — o
v
E
(...9 L4---
o
N.
! , red .114 4 c` "? * �€ rr t v:,
1 i iii'� r ''',,_,..":-.-t;
.....^ .. ,� 1 A * , F „nom i
�, _ 4 -^- �� 1
7 °' :716 r
litfrabigt
.
r 'I - ' r j }
Elp.. W P ! °fir` � —.4
. 1 . il i, 1, 1 h ,. // M
...„....
�1 A .f v A iI e .� i3 !_ , .,(..........,.7 _i a \II ,
. , •
... ,
, _6
9' ,s , ,,„, , . : , v. 00
r
. . .
t',
. .
. •
ut
/` .
^ r
_y *, . r 1'
i
R
;•.,, ii,1,
i
Why are there 4 parking spaces for
every car ?
Hotel
Shops visitors Cafe
Beach
zueanelsab
*Jam U sal sdoyg
Nr--,4814 /IF
awoH
aJeDAJA a
ao�
seds Igupisied ti alain aie AqM
Parking Accumulation
Restaurant
Supply
L
ru
u
v
03
0_
4_
0
v
-?
D
z
12am Gam noon 6pm 12am
W1 wd9 uoou we9 wezi
v,
Aiddns
Ie ! uP ! s
alj
uo ! e , nwncnv SUPIJBd
Parking
-lotel
Supply
6pm 12am
weN wd9 uoou we9 well
'' ) 1
z
rD
0
-o
co
-S
o_
n
co
- N
AiddnS
II elai
UOIBflWflDD\j Ou
" Shared
P
% reduction in total parking demand
based on accumulation curves
wezT wd9 uoou we9 weft
' \\\ rD
ro
AiddnS
aa11.41no aanluanpd
uoiejnwnDD\y 2upIJed
O
I I
p
LC)
0
O
Q
0�� 1V
0 -�
•
eL
V '
v
ir
` ril.' ___ __________________ _ _
•
n.
0.
. _ ,- ''
1 _ G
l
S/+r S
evr
-,. a
.',
4.444,44-4''
I=
'' ''..' •
, . . (
I ,
. , 1 i
,
I
,
i
,
,
,
.
I : : ,
, ,
, ,
, „,
,,r
•
•1'
, ,• •
.
, , ,
:: 1 1. i
.,: , ,
si
'
, S. f :,
„
. .
404 ea. , Alibi
....
s. li., ,•••,,%. ....
,,, ' „,„,,,,.•-•• ,, ,
4? 4 • 4111W
..
,..„„.
.,
": ,
Y
■ A f i.ix,
.,
.,
1)1:11111 , •, .
,.,'• '.','" '-,...- ';`) ,
.
,
'
,, 4 , ,,‘,1710;i• .0
!
1.
, :
: :
, r...,..
m
F t.A ' f's°I
. ,,, i„,'• # ,,,,, *,.. 00 -.
..„
4.• , ' ft,
yt
Jr,
t i' ' i ''f-,,t , 4fi
.41 ' °11” ,it /*•' '''''
t .•
„sr „fis,
4 i
i 1 ...
00
1 t.. 4.1°.
' . ,
.,,0 4 *'
*” . tit, 1 I '
I*
,. ,. A '
.,,,
' t *
.. ,
,t.
1 ' '4
, .
to
r”
?
}
| � | ` |
} . .
} � �
\ \ AJeuoipeH
} � .
)
\ �
\ . �
\ � �
)
sanssi .Oul >ped salpeaddy omi
Two Problems With the
Reactionary Approach
1 . Parking is like a balloon
uoomeq I ! I s ! u ! Jed • T
qeodd AJeuo ! peod
aye swqoJcj onnl
Two Problems With the
Reactionary Approach
2 . Parking is expensive
r Capital costs
Maintenance costs
Land opportunity costs
There is no "free" parking . . .
• • • parking spaces always cost
somebody something
. 4w - 7- , _
The
High Cost
of
Free Parking
DONALD SHOUP ..
PSE _ parking Space Equivalents
$$$
Mode Build
Shift
More
Parking
# of People Mode Parking Parkin Parking
g g Surplus/Shor
Present Share Demand Supply
tage
r.
;rn.
1„,,v
xr.
(11
From Kauai Multimodal Land Transportation Plan
Population Economy
Travel Demand
Transit Service Pedestrian Setting
Mode
Bike Facilities Choice Road Capacity
Traffic Growth Public Energy Household
Vehicle Miles of Travel Health Consumption Economics
(VMT) Safety+ Active Living Petroleum Imports H + T Index
Chapter 5 . Scenarios
Figure 5-9:Mode share
Baseline Mode Share - All Trips
2010 2020 2035
Walk Bicycle Walk Bicycle Walk Bicycle
Transit 4.5% 2.0% Transit 4.5% 2.0% Transit 4.5% 2.0%
0.4% 0.5% 0.5%
MOA MOA MOA
38.7% 38.7% 38.7%
P I V o t .
mode share
Preferred Mode Share - All Trips
2010 2020 2035
Walk Bicycle Walk Bicycle Bicycle
Transit 4.5% 2.0% 7.6% 3.6% 7.6%
0.4% Transit
13% Transit
3.6%
MOA MOA
38.7% 38.3%
MOA
37.9%
JL
�r 1 V .� ry
•
.J
41 @"G' k ..
� �
s •''
P
__ /- . 1 '- .r+ ,r /.,
1 F i /
G---- J
Ill'
J,'
r f.=
•
t.
,
.e _`ice d
.
., _, •
- '
( , ry.te�`• O�
Pi'
1■1■1■
`
L. k i�• = Y
.%. So ,i110.11' g f% r;k1
1 ICI)
•�
j 1
,..,.' '''''''''.:'" , , '.. . 4.,,,/,:i,
a) ,, 1.., ; - - •
,
C
' "d
`
' ( f I
-!-41:i.
* )' / l , L' A "a-} i.f' ._ .�� '11 Te n '. L
IV
MG
r
,y
t x>,
tk\tt.
I
I\ .f ,„..„, ,,„.,,,,
Nt ,.„ „, 4
N\ \
'1\\\\ „„,,.,:77,':::,',. ,
11: a
s ,.
_.... .. .
..._, ... .
,. .
,.._
,..1„...„,,avr,„:„..
,,e.„,,,,,.. ,
\sill ,,,,.„040,,
.„,, ....:
..,„..
s , . .
„....„ ... ,
P !rx
, \ .,,,„„ ,.„
„, , ,
1
.t
h i \ „,,
ws
li
s ,4 Y , \
t
i
I'
!Y
ii
1{
ii
:
fie-
_
s'
qN
2 . Strategies
4-J
W
W
L—
V
0
• amnia
F.% W
4-1
cia
s..
„..
0
a--+
N
(10
tap
L i _
cu
tZ0
ca
cC)
r z
o
rill C
0 0
QQ-
n
....s Ord
O 0
cl. v'
(LI (--i-
D—
•
...is
(ND
0.,)
,....
f.,, _:)
.......,;:t
..
..„,....
.., ,
,,,,,.,, ,t,i:. :
. .
.... ..
,,,,, ..
,,,,;‘, i. 3
. ., ,
4 .
0
4
t
`
k
-,?",,,4:2,. ' rt)
•
sanssi
sueialsapad a2eanoDsip ,d Siui>iaed lenuilum .-i
SlSO3 il'lId2J ON ■/
aU.IOJUI UMmUMOp
aapeaeyp '8 saes pelaa aDnpaa
AliunuauaoD aol peq / aDuasaad
AS'aauAs sseu !snq Mod � ueialsapad Iium
2ui1aed wauadowapaa
ui puel pnua ooh .-r 78 Nu ! aS'eanoDsip �
wnouae
< y�nua oo} lN�!a y�noua you � >
Aiddns Jo UflOWV 1. 115Th
ZEOZ zioz
puewaa
Aiddns
puewaa
LpeoJddV d
. S
zEOZ ZTOZ
puew a
Aiddns
LpeoJddV pseI - ueId .
It.e
kill'LI 1111
IMP
• uaa , doffs euuo sApoqou
'›iaed eq aye ol no wo o
ol ueM 1 , uop aidoad ji
Cti
CD
3
_.
rt.
P't•
V
r--F
rF (!)
•
O
r--I-
rn
MINIM •
O �
n
�D
3
�D
4
sauil 2ui1eleD sa — snn� ���o�s •
aDi }ou al1ua2 — saapua�.�o auai� �sai� •
(sJijjo Mel you ) saaDaoJua AIpu !J � •
��ep pJeoq - uo/pq pueq — Aoouq uaapow •
sAaN luauaaDao�. u3
C
Q)
E
U a)
L
U
0
. _
b w
(1)
cD
-I- )
C
_� o
a
Q NJ
47)
4-
CO
cu
ham^
^ ,J \
W I'
E
a
cuo
C
ro
Demand Reduction Techniques
• Mode share (transit, bicycles)
• Park once
• Mixed use/internal capture
likihil'ab, INVOIRM
VS- .. ...
' 14 44- ill&
f/
s I 110' • f41100 0
sta
l f. j
tto
_C
4;
L
vl ^^0
� �..L
4...)
r) a) v)
L
U
C
c (13
O a) .>
U E -5
-1-; a)
C o-
(1)
a) D a)
E to ro co
U
C ai a
(1) '- E cn
too c tuo
U C
co L
U
• — CD (1)t�0 Ste.
4...) a) (I) •-
a_ a_ 0
• • • •
1
3 co
...1 _ • _<
0
. • .<
0
m- arl
c ‹....,
(--1-
0
rD
D ■ •
D 0_
MI
0 CM 0
0
f'1" ■. D r—t-
0 IQ C7 e4- r -
ri)
("D xl• 0
(.11
= ET
r-f- a„)
0
m- c rD
(D &
, c
-,s
rcl
* (ND
• %< m- ' N
o al
_is ri)
a DJ
10., ,
.f., .--:0: i •<
A w' c c
3 . Workshop
apis LIDea luasaad `uieuaaa saDuaaajnp aaaynn —
aaage —
aaeduaoD 'asodoad —
aapisuoD `ssmsip —
: ypeoadde snsuasum dnoag .
aadaa> aLUq. dnoaS Apluapi
aalaodaa dnoa Apluapi .
sdnoJ
Grou p Assign ments
phrase Identify two most important near term issues
L Short phrase 1
2 . Short
e Identify trip purpose associated with each issue
e Propose two near term strategies
L Short phrase 1
2 . Short
Propose two long term strategies
1 . Short phrase
2 . Short
v
a
«3
LBO
A •e �
affinlingninin ammo
CID (10)
0
MEC LIMA
. 44tik\
•
I P ";
. • • '. - • ''%!
a4
qua
V
r
. '11\if "4 ....'
sr
,� ^^
,. , �f `a- ellP ' r- .rya
is
"Tk 56_ , (thelle5
411.;
AtIr
Ertl , \
4
:-i
`as
,
,max '
.t =
T
04.,,,,Pr MO 9,-...
- - 0 T it. t �LE1
'7'.1 r.)
,;*''''',.. ,..„: , .,#. # , , , , .,„ , .4 $.- -J
riR4 OIv 4 �a Al. -
g .ma.,Y `e�z,..na 'c,_. __ r. R"#ar - ,Y. .,;Frs',i ?� .:-„$,. _ �F'„�.�°a^:, x• '�w `.�
4
5i z�
A t:-
w
5`.+K
. -
, 6,, gu\tz. lEp.....14,..\ t 6oi/'
L 4 5b1
' (;) eirN5e,--1,1 '4( R*1 .4740- sit,4.51 KE,1.40 fits) -1.6 pl .4%itr.v:.,,k#44....
(et) o t � t .
/ ' -F o
1-.,,,. .,
v,y
- uilloty i
,,` s :. .- t
4-'r 1 • 4
kites 1 . ATst
41) (:iivtriNtiv 0..r...-4,1:.0044-,; skt,e,, To Pfx,c,„i iNt...,_ ArysktLiAtlE, 4
s L1 klE c?44.K I
F' z F—1 41
.'. 15_9_111 ' ---i -1E oit c.„ ,,
•
r- £ Cc) (,tip` I ;L L 1 t,: , .� ° , t . arc 4 T
-......i.. . k..7, 7b3,..-T or-- -1.v...'i. --.0s-t.,,t..4.N / NI P ic,,,I i V.L4.(--ktkC`4e41 A$4.1*%..--.1.-' -. i....*Srs.,..- ,
1 , (Z. . E1) . 3. k IC 6t ,... �' i " ° '5; ` `1.I
, . „. ( ...„----1-77-) .. i 1 ...----) -AL- -4,
.0,-,..i '. , I -,...,f- r \ .,..j - , .. ...
y
' r . ' ..
,
$1104;‘,. ,,,,, ! . 114 Yfre;g"..:..10-4V-WA10-.2,-.1L:i-'',.'1.'”
•
`� E
i
i
1
..ii / „,t.,.:„... .,,,. ,.
....
1 ., ) 1 ,,....
.....,
„.
..„. ..
„:„...„..,,,...,...,,..„,.'ii',17'.:'''''t,:,
a
4
z
+
Isk, ;.Xik,,,_ '/ i 1. / t
f
_ s�
t
/z S srf,-,
e t
sa
,. :,,,,,,:„.44„..4.:4-t-'5...,..;-:..,,,,,:=,.'*,,;::...„...f-,..
[ 441 ..,;!.--, 4 ' ' ' 4,...., 4 - T " - 4
f a
. # g , p
<
0.
.'
pry
a
-f _'
� � i:k N �• { � 6t F
;L, #n,,,.r.1'f'.,.'"+-,.5 @' y,' u'"f ,i<Y, .,,'.,'7 3«^+.R„ : «,,;%* ?...,J.,„,,,, i Y-�.i.9?//,:..:, /y""'°,:,:. ^"5' .n'n'?:4 ,+e n.....
v;,;� F