Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015_0825_AgendaPacketRoy Morita Chair John Low Vice -Chair Members: Nancy Golden Elizabeth Hahn Jeffrey Iida Richard Jose Karen Matsumoto COUNTY OF KAUA'I CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA Tuesday, August 25, 2015 3:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter Mo'ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room 3 4444 Rice Street, Llhu'e, HI 96766 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Open Session Minutes of June 23, 2015 BUSINESS CSC 2015 -06 Discussion on adopting Guidelines for Implementing Civil Service Commission Procedures for the Selection, Evaluation and Dismissal of the Director of Human Resources and possible decision - making to schedule a Public Hearing on adding such Rule Changes as Subchapter 7 (On- going) DIRECTOR'S REPORT TO INCLUDE ANY UPDATES ON THE TRANSISTION PLAN CSC 201543 July 2015 Director's Report a. Report 15 -01 from the Office of the County Auditor on the Audit of County Hiring Practices, January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 b. Report 15 -02 from the Office of the County Auditor on the Audit of County Payroll System, January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013 CSC 2015 -14 August 2015 Director's Report a. April -June 2015 Quarterly Report to the County Council EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes § §92-4 and 92 -5 (a) (4), 92 -9 (a)(1-4) (b), the purpose of this executive session is to receive and approve Executive Session minutes and to consult with the Commission's legal counsel on issues pertaining to the Commission's and the County's An Equal Opportunity Employer powers, duties, privileges, immunities, and/or liabilities as they may relate to this item, deliberate and take such action as appropriate. ES -014 Executive Session Minutes of June 23, 2015 Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes § §92 -4 and 92 -5 (a) (2) (4), the purpose of this executive session is to consider the hire, evaluation, dismissal or discipline of an employee or officer of the County where consideration of matters affecting privacy will be involved, provided that if the individual concerned requests an open meeting, an open meeting shall be held; and to consult with the Commission's legal counsel on issues pertaining to the Commission's and the County's powers, duties, privileges, immunities, and/or liabilities as they may relate to this item, deliberate and take such action as appropriate. ES -010: RFA 2015 -01 Commission's consideration of rescheduling a Communication filed 2/17/15 appealing applicant's disqualification for the Civil Engineer II and Civil Engineer III position by the Human Resources Department (On- going; awaiting Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law from Attorney General's Office) RETURN TO OPEN SESSION Ratify Commission actions taken in Executive Session for items: E&014 and E&010 ANNOUNCEMENTS Next Meeting: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 — 2 :00 p.m., Mo'ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room 31 ADJOURNMENT NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes §92 -7 (a), the Commission may, when deemed necessary, hold an executive session on any agenda item without written public notice if the executive session was not anticipated in advance. Any such executive session shall be held pursuant to H.R.S. §924 and shall be limited to those items described in H.R.S. §92 -5(a). c: Deputy County Attorney Nicholas Courson Civil Service Commission — August 25, 2015 Page 12 PUBLIC COMMENTS and TESTIMONY Persons wishing to offer comments are encouraged to submit written testimony at least 24 -hours prior to the meeting indicating: 1. Your name and if applicable, your position/title and organization you are representing; 2. The agenda item that you are providing comments on; and 3. Whether you will be testifying in person or submitting written comments only. 4. If you are unable to submit your testimony at least 24 hours prior to the meeting, please provide 10 copies of your written testimony at the meeting clearly indicating the name of the testifier; and While every effort will be made to copy, organize and collate all testimony received, materials received on the day of the meeting or improperly identified may be distributed to the members after the meeting is concluded. The length of time allocated to persons wishing to present verbal testimony may be limited at the discretion of the chairperson or presiding member. Send written testimony Civil Service Commission Attn: Barbara Davis Office of Boards & Commissions 4444 Rice Street, Suite 150 Llhu`e, HI 96766 Email: bdavis @kauai.gov Fax: 241 -5127 Phone: 241 -4919 SPECIAL ASSISTANCE If you need an alternate format or an auxiliary aid to participate, please contact the Boards & Commissions Support Clerk at 241 -4919 at least five (5) working days prior to the meeting. Civil Service Commission — August 25, 2015 Page 13 A A 1 *14 1 '1A IRA J, Minutes of Meeting OPEN SESSION Board/Committ ee: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Meeting Date June 23, 2015 Location Mo'ikeha Building, Liquor Control Commission, Meeting Room 3 Start of Meeting: 3:00 p.m. End of Meeting: 4:18 p.m. Present Chair Roy Morita; Vice Chair John Low. Members: Nancy Golden; Elizabeth Hahn (3:01 p.m.); Jeffrey Iida; Richard Jose; Karen Matsumoto Also: Deputy Attorney Nick Courson; Boards & Commissions Office Staff: Support Clerk Barbara Davis; Administrator Jay Furfaro; Director of HR Janine Rapozo Excused Absent SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION Call To Chair Morita called the meeting to order at 3:00 Order/Roll Call p.m. with 6 members present. Chair Morita asked to take the agenda out of order and instead of going into Executive Session he would like to start with Open Session first. Approval of Open Session Minutes of May 26, 2015 Mr. Iida moved to approve the minutes as Minutes circulated. Mr. Low seconded the motion. Motion carried 6:0 Ms. Hahn entered the meeting at 3:01 p.m. Business CSC 2015 -04 Review Department and Commission's procedures and forms for filing appeals (On- going) Staff suggested tabling this item until such time as the Attorney and Director have time to work on the forms and to bring it back at that time. CSC 2015 -06 Discussion on adopting Guidelines for Implementing Civil (}� Service Commission Procedures for the Selection, Evaluation and Dismissal of the Director of Human Resources and possible decision -makin to LA Civil Service Commission Open Session June 23, 2015 Page 2 SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION schedule a Public Hearing on adding such Rule Changes as Subchapter 7 (On-going) Attorney Courson noted he anticipated completing this item faster that CSC 2015 -04 and it can be left on the agenda as on-going, Director's CSC 2015 -012 June 2015 Director's Report Reports Ms. Rapozo summarized that it has been a very busy time for HR with new hires for the summer enrichment program as well as the Mayor's Office internship programs. It has also been busy with classification changes due to the separation of the Solid Waste Division and the Roads Division so a lot of time was spent with Public Works to get all of the positions converted. With the approval of the contracts for HGEA's units 2, 3, and 4 along with the SHOPO raises for the police officers and the Hawaii firefighters raises that are all due on July 1, the focus has been working on payroll certifications for almost 1,000 employees at this point. Chair Morita asked if HR is looking at filling their 2 other vacant positions to which Ms. Rapozo said yes, an HR Specialist I and an HR Specialist II position have been posted; depending on the response received will determine what level they will be hiring at. There is also the vacant dollar funded position, which will focus on the HRIS system that was approved in next year's budget, so there are two vacancies we are able to hire for and they have been posted. Ms. Matsumoto asked if the HRIS specialist will be an HR specialist or an IT person. Ms. Rapozo said they have it as an HR specialist, but the applications coming in are not looking favorable so we may need to re- evaluate that. Ms. Hahn asked if the HRIS platform is going to be around for the County for a while, or are we astill trying to patch something that is outmoded, and if so is there any alternative? Ms. Rapozo said when she first came on board it was determined they would not be purchasing a new system, and they need to look into how to maximize the usage of what the County has. The IT manager is taking the lead on this and at Civil Service Commission Open Session June 23, 2015 Page 3 SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION this point he feels it is doable. The system was geared towards the payroll side so we need to make sure we maximize the HR side. Chair Morita questioned if the 58 workers' compensation claims noted under the Employee Development Health Services were for the calendar or fiscal year. Ms. Rapozo said that is what they reviewed with their 3' parry administrator for the quarter so they are active claims. We average around 10 claims opened per month, and try to close out claims as we go along so there is an active list of a little over 100 at any one time. These 58 cases are what we reviewed with our carrier and are more roblematic cases we want to see how we can move forward. Executive Mr. Jose moved to go into Executive Session at Session - 3 :10 p.m. Mr. Iida seconded the motion. Motion carried 7:0 Deputy Attorney Nick Courson read the Hawai'i Revised Statutes detailed on the agenda to take the Commission into Executive Session for ES- 013, ES -010: RFA 2015 -01 and ES -012: CSC 2015 -11. Return to Open Ratify Commission actions taken in Executive Session for items: The motion and second to return to Open Session ES -013, ES -010: RFA 2015 -01 and ES -012: CSC 2015 -11. Session at 3 :47 p.m. was withdrawn to allow the Commissioners to also evaluate the Director. The meeting resumed in Open Session at 4:17 p.m. Mr. Low moved to ratify the Commission's actions taken in Executive Session. Mr. Iida seconded the motion. Motion carried 7:0 Announcements Next Meeting: The July meeting is cancelled. August meeting will be held on the 25th at 3 :00 p.m, Civil Service Commission Open Session June 23, 2015 Page 4 SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION Adjournment Ms. Hahn moved to adjourn the meeting at 4:18 p.m Mr. Iida seconded the motion. Motion carried 7:0 r Submitted by. Reviewed and Approved by: Barbara Davis, Staff Support Clerk Roy Morita, Chair Approved as circulated. ( Approved with amendments. See minutes of meeting. Guidelines for Implementing the Civil Service Commission Procedures for the 1. Implementing n m,1"s Selection of the Human Resources Director For Steps 1, 2, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c) the Commission should do the following regarding the Human Resources Director Position Description: 16 Commission to post agenda item for the review of the position description. ► 2. Commission to determine if changes are to be made to the position description. 3. Commission to vote on a motion to accept amended position description if changes are made. 4. Commission to develop interview questions. All candidates shall be asked the same questions. Step 1: Nominated Candidates by the Commission 19 Commission to Post executive session agenda item for nomination process. 2. Commission members, including ex- officio members, who are interested in recommending nominees, shall obtain the resumes of the potential candidates. In Executive Session: 39 Commission members, including ex- officio members, to nominate candidates for consideration. 4. Each Commission member shall be allowed to nominate no more than one candidate. S. Resumes of nominated candidates shall be forwarded by the Commission in a confidential memorandum to the Commission Select Committee, in care of the Office of Boards and Commissions, for review to ensure that 1 CSC 2015 -06 minimum qualifications set forth by the County Charter are met. 6. Commission to request that the Office of Boards and Commissions schedule interview(s) with the qualified nominees. 7. Commission to post agenda item for the selection of the Human Resources Director, 80 Commission to take action on a motion to select the Human Resources Director from the list of qualified nominees. 9. Commission to inform the Mayor of its selection. Step 2: If no selection is made in Step 1, then the Commission will move to Step 2 and utilize option available under Step 2. Ste 2 a : Recommendation of Candidates by a Select Committee 18 Commission to post item on the agenda to appoint Select Committee members and identify the scope for a three - member permitted interaction group. (The Chairperson appoints the Select Committee members and the Commission defines the scope of the tasks for the Select Committee at a noticed meeting). 2. The Select Committee will establish all advertisements and chose the publications for any such advertisements. 30 The Select Committee will review all applications /resumes. 4. Resumes of applicants shall be forwarded by the Select Committee in a confidential memorandum to the Commission for review to ensure that minimum qualifications set forth in the County Charter are met. S. The Select Committee may interview the candidates deemed qualified by the Commission. 6. The Select Committee may select up to five finalists for the Commission's review and prepare a report on the finalists. 2 CSC 2015 -06 7. Commission to post executive session agenda for acceptance of the Select Committee's report and recommended finalists. 8. Commission will review the report, may accept the report, and if necessary conduct additional interviews with the finalists. 9. Commission to take action on a motion to select one of the recommended finalists at a noticed meeting. 100 Commission to inform the Mayor of its selection. Ste 2 b : Recommendation of Candidates by Consultant 16 Commission to post agenda item to take action on selecting a consultant to provide a list of candidates. 2. Commission will delegate the procurement obligations to the Office of Boards and Commissions. I Office of Boards and Commissions will define the scope of work for the consultant and prepare the procurement documentation. 4. Office of Boards and Commissions will determine who will sit on the review and selection committee to select the consultant and advertise for resumes through the Department of Finance /Purchasing Division, S. Office of Boards and Commissions to draft the consultant contract. 6. Legal review by Office of the County Attorney. 70 Review and Selection Committee meets to review resumes and rate the consultants. 8. Consultant is selected and executes contract with the County. 9. Consultant will establish all advertisements and choose the publications for any such advertisements. 109 Consultant will review all applications /resumes. 3 CSC 2015 =06 11. Consultant shall forward resumes in a confidential memorandum to the Commission for review to ensure that minimum qualifications set forth in the County Charter are met. 12. The Commission shall submit in a confidential memorandum a certified list of the qualified candidates to the consultant. Be Commission to post agenda for acceptance of the consultant's report and identification of qualified candidates. 14. Commission will review the report, may accept the report, and, if necessary, conduct interviews of the qualified candidates. 15. Commission to take action on a motion for appointment of any of the qualified candidates at a noticed meeting. 16. Commission to inform the Mayor of its selection. Ste 2(c): Commission Developed Selection Process 1. Commission to post agenda item to discuss and develop its own process to select the Human Resources Director. 2. Commission to take action on identified selection process and follow procedural requirements designed in the process to select the Human Resources Director. 39 Commission to take action on a motion for appointment at close of the selection process at a noticed meeting. 4. Commission to inform Mayor of its selection. II. Implementing RPPC Rule 1444, Provisions for the Evaluation of the Human Resources Director Evaluation Procedures: 1. Commission to post agenda item to discuss the evaluation procedures to fulfill annual evaluation requirement of the 4 CSC 2015 -06 Human Resources Director's performance as required by the R ,?,,PC Rule -14 -5. 2. Commission to distribute evaluations as provided in the Administrative Policies and Procedures of Human Resources, 3. Commission to post executive session agenda item to discuss the performance of the Human Resources Director to conclude the evaluation. 4. Commission to administer evaluation with the Director of Human Resources and create a memo to personnel file attaching the evaluation. M. Implementing RPPC Rule 144 -6, Provisions for the Dismissal of the Human Resources Director Dismissal Procedures: 1. Commission to post executive session agenda item to discuss dismissal of the Human Resources Director, 29 Following discussion in executive session, unless waived by the Human Resources Director to hold an open session, Commission may take action to dismiss the Human Resources Director by majority vote of the Commission without an adjudicatory hearing. IV. Authority for the Director of Human Resources to Appoint a Deputy: The Director of Human Resources may appoint a Deputy Director of Human Resources to assist with his or her duties. The Director of Human Resources shall develop and periodically review the position description for the Deputy of Human Resources position. A copy of the position description shall be kept on file with the Department of Human Resources. 5 CSC 2015 -06 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR'S REPORT TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION JULY 2015 As the end of the fiscal year came to a close, the department completed all of the necessary payroll certifications to ensure the processing of pay raises for all employees in bargaining units 2, 3, 4, 11, and 12. In addition, the County's contributions towards premiums for the Employer's Union Trust Fund (EUTF) were adjusted to provide for additional payments to employees' health premiums. Costs for health insurance continue to rise and thus, both the County and employees will see increases in payments towards insurance premiums in the upcoming fiscal year. PKF Pacific Hawaii LLP completed both the County's Hiring Practices Audit and the Payroll Audit this month. There were three (3) findings in each of the audits to which the department provided responses that are included in the audits (see attached). The audits were presented to the County Council on July 8`h and both the auditors and the Administration were present to respond to questions. The audits covered periods from January 2009 to December 2013. As such, changes have already been made when the department transitioned to the Department of Human Resources (HR) in July 2012 that addresses some of the findings. Similarly, central payroll functions were not moved to HR until July 2014 and therefore, many of the findings have already been addressed especially with regards to the retention of documents. The department found it necessary to repost for the Human Resources Specialist I and Human Resources Specialist lI positions due to the lack of applicants. The second posting closed on July I 01 and applications received are being reviewed for qualifications. A variety of workshops and trainings were provided this past month in response to specific departmental needs and in working with increasing our efforts to provide needed support for our supervisors. A one -day new supervisory training was held for fourteen (14) of KPD's newly promoted Sergeants, Lieutenants and Officers -in- Charge. In addition, Supervisors in all departments were also able to sign up for "A Day in the Life of an Effective Supervisor" workshop and attend "Creating a Respectful Workplace" and "Behavioral Styles & Interpersonal Communications" workshops to provide skills in dealing with co- workers, subordinates and supervisors. Following are highlights and statistics from the various divisions: Administrative Services and Benefits • Workwise Hawaii was selected to continue to provide services for the County's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for the upcoming year; contract no. 9249 was executed effective July 15` + An amendment to FIRMS' (First Risk Management Services) contract no. 8504 for the continuation of third party administrator services for workers' compensation claims was executed for the upcoming fiscal year. • The County of Kauai's Compensation Plan 2015 was distributed to all jurisdictions and County departments. • Processed eight (8) pre -tax applications for transit passes for the upcoming fiscal year. • New Hires: Automotive Mechanic I Building Permit Clerk Bus Driver - substitute (2) (exempt) Customer Service Representative Deputy County Attorney (exempt) Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (exempt) Lifeguard (6) Lifeguard -on -call (exempt) Payroll Clerk (exempt) • Exit Interviews Conducted: 2 of 4 • TDI Applications I (approved) • Leave Sharing: 3 • Reference Checks:. 9 * Transactions: New Hires 8 -Separations 5 Reallocations 3 Promotions 14 Demotions 0 Transfers 4 Pay Increase II Suspension 0 Leave Without Pay 28 Other 63 Seasonal 63 Classification and Pay and Labor Relations • UPW Arbitration Hearing regarding a Department of Water employee who did not receive call out credit and overtime was continued to July 7`l. • Reallocations Processed: Accountant II to Accountant I OA Baseyard Attendant I Laborer II Community Services Program Assistant to Community Service Worker Grounds Helper to Tree Trimmer Grounds Helper to Tree Trimming Heavy Truck and Aerial Platform Operator Human Resources Specialist II to Human Resources Specialist III (3) Lifeguard to Water Safety Officer II Legal Clerk II to Senior Clerk Legal Clerk III to Senior Clerk Police Officer II to Police Officer I Police Officer I to Police Services Officer (4) Police Services Officer to Police Officer I (8) Records Management Analyst I to Records Management Analyst II Recreation Leader II to Recreation Leader III Recreation Worker I to Recreation Worker II Water Safety Officer I to Water Safety Officer II Water Safety Officer II to Lifeguard (8) Recruitment and Exam • Staff in the recruitment division attended various trainings including NEOGOV's on- boarding process, updating of the County's website format including departmental web pages, Behavioral Interviewing, A Day in the Life of an Effective Supervisor and Creating a Respectful Workplace,. • Assisted in providing responses to the County Hiring Practices Audit. Recruitments: Account Clerk Community Service Worker Deputy County Attorney (exempt) Equipment Operator II Human Resources Specialist I Human Resources Specialist II Police Services Officer Project Manager Program Specialist II (Aging) • Lists Referred to Departments: Agricultural Land Use Inspector Beautification and Parks Maintenance Supervisor Code Enforcement Officer Deputy County Attorney (exempt) Emergency Services Dispatcher I Maintenance Worker I Summer Youth Programs (exempt) k3 Written Exams Administered: Payroll Youth Summer Enrichment Program (seasonal) (exempt) Beautification Parks Maintenance Supervisor Emergency Services Dispatcher I Maintenance Worker I Police Services Officer • Staff continues to make progress in reconciling accruals in the AS400 system for all employees; activated additional payroll codes to accurately reflect accruals for those employees on workers' compensation. Assisted in providing responses to the County's Payroll Audit. • Worked with KPD to properly pay retroactive amounts to three (3) Officers based on the recent Supreme Court decision regarding promotions arbitrated back in 2007. Employee Development and Health Services Workers' compensation claims and liability claims continue to be reviewed through the completion of safety assessments and follow up with respective departments for further action including changes to operational policies and procedures, disciplinary action or further training, • Coordinating the use of a federal mediator as part of a grievance for the Finance Department. • Equipment/Driver Training: Hook -Lift Tandem Truck (Peterbilt) #158 (1 Public Works' employee) PC 27 MR Excavator #30093 Komatsu -Small Excavator (2 Public Works' employees) Automated Refuse Truck - single and double axle -Auto Car Truck (1 Public Works' employee) Other Training; A Day in the Life of an Effective Supervisor (24 employees) .Behavioral Styles & Interpersonal Communications -two sessions (31 employees) Creating a Respectful Workplace -two sessions (42 employees) KPD New Supervisory Training (14 employees) M 4k AUDIT OF COUNTY HIRING PRACTICES Cs� Submitted by Office of the County Auditor County of Kauai State of Hawaii Report No. 15 -01 PREFACE This audit assesses whether the County of Kaua`i's hiring practices are in compliance with laws, statutes, rules and regulations and is efficient and effective. This performance audit of the County's hiring process was designed to examine County procedures to hire, promote, transfer and reallocate employees fairly and without bias. We would like to thank all who contributed data to this report, especially the Information Technology section of the Department of Finance and the Department of Personnel Services. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER I Introduction Background Audit Objectives and Scope The County of Kauai Hiring Procedures Audit Methodology CHAPTER 2 Audit Findings and Recommendations 1 3 5 5 5 5 6 im 12 Finding 1. The County did not consistently adhere to HRS and County policies when hiring and conducting promotions, transfers and reallocations. 12 Finding 2. The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to the risk of non - compliance with bargaining unit agreements, internal policy and HRS. 13 Finding 3. A lack of controls surrounding certain procedures and DPS' IT systems subjects the County to fraud risk. 15 AUDITEE RESPONSE 2 iGel EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PKF Pacific Hawaii LLP ( "PKF" or "we ") has completed an audit of the County of Kaua`i's ( "County ") hiring practices under contract with the Office of the County Auditor. The performance audit examined the County's hiring procedures from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. The audit was designed to answer: • Is the County in compliance with applicable rules and regulations related to the hiring of civil service and exempt personnel? and • Does the County have sufficient controls in place to ensure fair, uniform and transparent selection of the best qualified employee for the position? The audit findings and recommendations are summarized as follows: Finding I: The County did not consistently adhere to Hawaii Revised Statutes ("HRS") and County policies when hiring and conducting promotions, transfers and reallocations, The Department of Personnel Services ( "DPS ") did not conduct physical examinations for two of the employee numbers in our sample. DPS also delegates certain procedures to the appointing authority but does not require formal documentation to show the procedures were actually performed. Recommendation: DPS should reassess current procedures and controls to ensure compliance with HRS and County policy to establish fair and consistent hiring, promotions, transfers and reallocations. Because HRS assigns much of the policy - making authority to the Director of DPS, most procedures may not be specifically required by statute. Nonetheless, internal policies should be reviewed for best practices, clearly written, regularly communicated to DPS staff and held to the same standard of authority as HRS. DPS should not completely remove themselves from any personnel action procedure. If DPS decides to empower the departments, it should at least act in the capacity of record - keeper to keep itself involved with the process and maintain segregation of duties. This will allow DPS to monitor the appointing authority to ensure all procedures are sufficiently followed. 3 Finding 2: The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to the risk of non - compliance with bargaining unit agreements, internal policy and HRS. We noted 64 instances where DPS was unable to provide documentation for one of our hiring, promotion, transfer or reallocation testing procedures, including four files that were missing in their entirety. Recommendation: DPS should maintain an audit trail of sufficient documentation to support all personnel activity during an employee's career with the County. All documents should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record - keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate its adherence to HRS and County policies for future audit examinations, comply with employee requests to exercise their right to inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible dispute with employees. There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. Finding 3: A lack of controls surrounding certain procedures subjects the County to fraud risk. In accordance with internal policy, DPS is allowed to designate certain positions as "unskilled labor," which permits the appointing authority to bypass the interview process during recruitment. However, we noted there were insufficient approval and monitoring controls surrounding the assignment of this designation, which potentially allows the interview process to be circumvented for all county positions. Recommendation: DPS should ensure sufficient controls and procedures are in place for all types of personnel action, in particular for those that allow civil service requirements to be bypassed as these subject the County to the greatest amount of risk. Ell e Introduction This audit was conducted pursuant to the authority of the Office of the County Auditor, as provided in the County Charter. Background - This performance audit examines the County's hiring practices, including promotions, transfers and reallocations. Performance audits provide information to improve program operations and facilitate decision making. For a complete definition of performance audits see Government Auditing Standards section 2.101 Audit Objectives and Scope The audit was designed to answer the following questions; • Is the County in compliance with applicable rules and regulations related to the hiring of civil service and exempt personnel? and Does the County have sufficient controls in place to ensure the fair, uniform and transparent selection of the best qualified employee for the position? The period under examination spanned from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013, Our scope included all hires, transfers, promotions and reallocations that occurred during this time period. Controls within the County's NeoGov IT recruiting and hiring system ( "NeoGov ") were also considered. 5 The County of Kauai Hiring Procedures Background There are two primary types of hiring categories in the County: civil service and exempt.. Each is comprised of several sub -types of hires such as contractors, temporary and emergency hires. Civil service employees are hired based on the State of Hawai'i's merit system and principles. According to HRS §76 -1, the merit principle is "the selection of persons based on their fitness and ability for public employment and the retention of employees based on their demonstrated appropriate conduct and productive performance." The County must adhere to the merit system unless specifically exempt by statute or a request for exempt status is approved. Civil Service Hires According to County policy, after the Department of Finance and the Mayor approve the availability of funds, the County may begin to openly recruit applicants either publicly or internally from the County's existing personnel. Those who pass a preliminary screening are issued an exam developed by DPS. These exams are tailored based on the position description to determine whether minimum qualifications are met. Applicants who pass are ranked by exam score and compiled to form an Eligible List, the pool from which the appointing authority may select to interview. Known as the "Rule of Five," DPS submits batches of five applications per vacancy to the appointing authority. Additional applicants may be requested as needed by the appointing authority but every applicant received must be contacted for interviews. Interviews are conducted by a panel of two or more people, including the position's direct supervisor. In addition to interviews, the appointing authority performs reference checks for each applicant. Although no formal policy exists, DPS will review the position description and requirements to determine whether a background check is required (e.g. position required working with children, handling money, etc.). The appointing authority notifies DPS of their final decision and files the basic employment documents (e.g. W -4, I -9, etc.). Pending a drug test, pre - employment physical examination and Mayoral approval, the applicant is considered an employee of the County. Exempt Hires Exempt employees may bypass the standard civil service recruiting procedures. To qualify for exempt status, a position must be specifically excluded by statute (HRS chapter 76 -77). These positions include those in the office of the mayor, elected officials; department heads and their assistants; deputy county attorneys, corporate counsel and prosecuting attorneys; law clerks and district judges among others. R J Alternatively, certain emergency, temporary or contracted positions may be classified as exempt if the appointing authority can show normal civil service recruitment procedures are not feasible. A properly approved request to fill vacancy is still required as well as an approved request for exempt status by the appointing authority. Although no formal policies exist, if enough applications are received, DPS will generate an eligible list and will remove applicant names prior to sending to the appointing authority. Typically, DPS only receives one or two applicants or the appointing authority notifies DPS a specific individual is sought for their position and no eligible list is formed. The remaining hiring and screening procedures are ultimately left to the discretion of the appointing authority. Transfers Transfers occur when an employee moves from one County position to another of similar duties and pay grade. Approval from both the department transferring the employee and the department receiving the employee are required. Reallocations Occasionally, departments will review position descriptions to determine whether they still adequately reflect position requirements and duties. If changes are necessary, consideration is given to whether title and pay grade should be adjusted as well, If the position is vacant, the department will initiate the appropriate recruitment process. Alternatively, if the position is already filled, DPS will reassess whether the incumbent meets the minimum qualifications of the updated position description, 7 Audit Methodology We developed an overall audit plan and risk -based strategy to approach and address the audit objectives, which included three distinct stages: planning, fieldwork and reporting. The planning stage involved obtaining an understanding of the County's hiring, transfer, promotion and reallocation process. Through telephone conferences and written requests, we reviewed documents prepared by DPS including memoranda of agreement, circular agreements, department policies and guidelines, HRS and other documentation to familiarize ourselves with the hiring, transfer, reallocation and promotion processes, identify areas of risk and determine the rules and regulations by which the County must abide. We also reviewed the County's organizational chart and position descriptions to select those to interview and walk us through each process to identify areas of risk and key controls to test. On November 18, 2014, we met with the Acting Director for DPS and two HR Specialist Its to discuss the hiring, promotion, transfer and reallocation processes, NeoGov and internal controls, including segregation of duties, within the department. To review internal controls within DPS' IT systems, we requested a listing of those who have access to NeoGov and the AS400, the payroll processing software used by DPS, along with their user rights and permissions in each system. We compared the lists to determine whether anyone had access to both systems and if proper segregation of duties had been implemented. Once we established our understanding of the processes surrounding each type of personnel activity, we identified a population from which to sample. We defined the population as all personnel activity during the period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013. Employee numbers were ultimately the easiest way to track personnel activity during the period. As such, we requested a list of all County employee numbers and all personnel activity for each number for the period under scope. We removed any duplicate line items and scanned the listing for any unusual activity. We also removed all activity involving elected officials as DPS was not involved with their hiring or employment. The list was categorized into six groups based on activity and each group was weighted based on the frequency of activity. We selected a sample for each based on their weighted values and a sample size of 40. A summary of the population and our sampling methodology is displayed below. E61 POPULATION AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 1 ,r�: � Y �- 6 I service hires 453 14% t hires 1,327 42% 17 Temporary hires _ 217 7% 3 Promotions 312 10% 4 Transfers 468 15% 6 Reallocations 388 12% 4 Total 3,1651 100% 40 Based on our interviews and review of DPS' internal policies and HRS, we developed procedures to test for compliance and the implementation of key controls. Exempt hires were deemed high risk because 1) civil service procedures are typically bypassed and 2) the departments hiring the exempt workers are given autonomy when recruiting for these positions. We followed -up on any issues and noted any mitigating circumstances or controls. Remaining findings that still posed a risk were summarized in Chapter 2 of this report. The procedures we performed and documents reviewed for each type of employment activity are listed in the tables below. CIVIL SERVICE HIRES V - � 1 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's Request to Fill Vacant Position, Approval request to fill vacancy. History from NeoGov). Z Noted position availability was properly advertised Detail Job Posting (County website). by DPS. 3 Noted minimum position qualifications and exam Eligible Candidates Listing (from score were met. NeoGov). Noted applicant was included in the list of eligibles Eligible Candidates Listing (from 4 and list of certified applicants sent to appointing NeoGov). authority for consideration. 5 Noted proper interview procedures were Referred Candidates (from NeoGov). performed. No documentation available at DPS. 6 Noted reference checks were performed. Noted physical and drug examinations were issued Doctor Evaluation, Pre - Employment 7 and passed. Examination Results Letter, Drug Test Results. Hire/Personnel Action Form (from 8 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's final selection notification to DPS. I NeoGov). V EXEMPT HIRES EXEMPT HIRES FOR PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS Noted proper approval of appointing authority's DPS AS -1. 1 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's Request to Fill Vacant Position, Approval History (from NeoGov ). request to fill vacancy. History ( from Ne_oGov). DPS AS -1. 2 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's Contract, DPS AS -1. request for exempt hiring status. year and properly approved. 3 Noted position was specifically exempt under HRS 76 -16. Doctor Evaluation, Pre - Employment HRS 76 -16. issued and passed. Examination Results Letter, Drug Test Noted physical and drug examinations were Doctor Evaluation, Pre - Employment 4 issued and passed. Examination Results Letter, Drug Test issued and passed. Examination Results Letter, Drug Test Results. 5 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's Hire /Personnel Action Form (from Noted proper approval of appointing authority's final selection notification to DPS. NeoGov). EXEMPT HIRES FOR PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS TEMPORARY HIRES 1 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's DPS AS -1. 1 request for exempt status due to special and request to fill vacant . History (from NeoGov ). unique services. Noted proper approval of appointing authority's 2 Noted duration of contract was limited to one Contract, DPS AS -1. year and properly approved. civil service recruitment. Noted physical and drug examinations were Doctor Evaluation, Pre - Employment 3 issued and passed. Examination Results Letter, Drug Test Results. TEMPORARY HIRES 1 For civil service promotions, see civil service procedures above. Request to Fill Vacant Position, Approval Noted proper approval of appointing authority's 2 request to fill vacant . History (from NeoGov ). Noted proper approval of appointing authority's DPS AS -1. 2 request for exempt status due to impracticality of civil service recruitment. 3 Noted employment term is less than 90 days with Payroll Certification, DPS AS -1. up to a 90 day extension. Noted physical and drug examinations were Doctor Evaluation, Pre- Employment 4 issued and passed. Examination Results Letter, Drug Test Results. 5 Noted proper approval of appointing authority's Hire/Personnel Action Form (from final selection notification to DPS. NeoGov ). PROMOTIONS 1 For civil service promotions, see civil service procedures above. See civil service procedures above. 2 For exempt promotions, see exempt procedures above. See exempt procedures above. 10 REALLOCATIONS ffla Noted position being transferred to had a similar Noted proper approval of revisions to position Classification Summary Audit Report, 1 description. Memo from Director of Personnel Noted proper approval from transferring and No documentation available at DPS. Services. receiving departments and that position was If revisions necessitated a change in pay grade, Classification Summary Audit Report, 2 noted proper approval. Memo from Director of Personnel Services. 3 Noted appropriate hiring procedures were See civil service or exempt procedures rformed if nosition was vacant. above. Noted minimum qualifications were met with Classification Summary Audit Report, 4 proper approval if position had an incumbent. Memo from Director of Personnel Services. TRANSFERS 1 Noted position being transferred to had a similar Payroll Certification. position description and pay grade. Noted proper approval from transferring and No documentation available at DPS. 2 receiving departments and that position was vacant. We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Information deemed confidential under the Hawaii state open records law (HRS chapter 92F) was omitted from this report. The determination of whether information was confidential was based on Office of Information Practices ( "011"") Guideline No. 3, effective September 7, 2011 and OIP memorandum dated May 1, 2002, "OIP Guidance Regarding Disclosure of Agency Records and Information to Auditors." Under the guidance of these documents, the following were omitted as confidential: employee social security numbers and actual base rates of pay and gross salaries for employees covered by or included in bargaining units as defined in the Hawaii collective bargaining law (HRS chapter 76). CHAPTER 2 Audit Findings and Recommendations Finding 1. The County did not consistently adhere to HRS and County policies when hiring and conducting promotions, transfers and reallocations. To ensure the best fit is hired for each position and a thorough recruiting process is implemented, HRS chapter 76 requires the application of the merit principle and acts as broader guidance for DPS when recruiting for civil service and exempt positions. Much of the statute, however, empowers and relies upon the Director of DPS to implement policies and procedures that will uphold the merit system. Exempt positions were deemed a high -risk area due to the number of civil service procedures waived during recruitment. With few procedures in place for the recruitment for exempt positions, there is a higher risk that unqualified applicants are accepted or that the appointing authority is able to use bias in its selections. All positions, including those exempt from civil service procedures require a physical and drug examination. We discovered two of the 17 exempt positions had no physical examinations performed. We also observed certain civil service procedures were delegated to the departments themselves. For these procedures, DPS did not require formal substantiation from the departments that the procedures were actually performed. DPS was therefore unable to provide any support as no documentation was maintained at DPS. A summary of the outsourced procedures is displayed below. PROCEDURES PERFORMED BY APPOINTING AUTHORITY Civil service hires i 6 6 W Reference check Transfers 6 I 6 Transfer approval between Total 1 12 1 12 12 Recommendations DPS should reassess current procedures and controls to ensure compliance with HRS and County policy to establish fair and consistent hiring, promotions, transfers and reallocations. Because HRS assigns much of the policy- making authority to the Director of DPS, most procedures may not be specifically required by statute. Nonetheless, internal policies should be reviewed for best practices, clearly written, regularly communicated to DPS staff and held to the same standard of authority as HRS. DPS should not completely remove themselves from any personnel action procedure. If DPS decides to empower the departments, it should at least act in the capacity of record -keeper to keep itself involved with the process and maintain segregation of duties. This will also allow DPS to monitor the appointing authority to ensure all procedures are sufficiently followed. Finding 2. The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to the risk of non - compliance with bargaining unit agreements, internal policy and HRS. All County BU agreements include a clause providing employees the right to inspect their personnel files. One of the most prevalent and pervasive issues during our testing was the lack of documentation. Three exempt hires and one temporary hire, who was also considered an exempt employee, had their entire employee files missing. There were a total of 64 instances in which DPS was unable to provide documentation to support a personnel action. We have summarized them below. 13 MISSING DOCUMENTATION DETAIL Recommendation: DPS should maintain an audit trail of sufficient documentation to support all personnel activity during an employee's career with the County. All documents should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record- keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate their adherence to HRS and County policies for future audit examinations, comply with employee requests to exercise their right to inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible dispute with employees. There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. 14 Vacancy 0 11 2 1 N/A N/A 14 Request A roval AS -1 Request N/A 14 2 1 N/A N/A 17 for Exempt Status PC /AS -1 Less N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A 1 than 90 Day Term Interview 1 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A 1 Documentation Physical/Drug 2 3 2 N/A N/A N/A 7 Screening Final Selection 1 11 2 3 N/A N/A 17 Approval Contract N/A 3 0 N/A N/A N/A 3 Reallocation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4 4 Approval Documents Total 4 42 9 5 0 4 64 Instances Noted Total Sampled 4 16 3 3 0 2 28 Items Affected j Sample Total 6 17 3 4 6 4 40 Recommendation: DPS should maintain an audit trail of sufficient documentation to support all personnel activity during an employee's career with the County. All documents should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record- keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate their adherence to HRS and County policies for future audit examinations, comply with employee requests to exercise their right to inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible dispute with employees. There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. 14 Finding 3. A lack of controls surrounding certain procedures subjects the County to fraud risk. We discovered interviews were not conducted for two of the six civil service hires tested. Although this was in compliance with Selection Procedures Circular No. 86 -30 dated May 16, 1986, which states "When selection is made from unskilled registration lists, all eligibles need not be contacted for an interview," we noted DPS had not implemented adequate controls to approve and monitor which positions were deemed as "unskilled labor." DPS explained only certain positions were given this designation based on their position description and included golf course groundskeepers, groundskeepers, land fill laborers, laborers, park caretakers and janitors. Without proper controls in place, however, DPS could potentially bypass the interview process for any position they designated as unskilled. Recommendation: DPS should ensure sufficient controls and procedures are in place for all types of personnel action, in particular for those that allow civil service requirements to be bypassed as these subject the County to the greatest amount of risk. 15 AUDITEE RESPONSE Finding 1: The County did not consistently adhere to HRS and County policies when hiring and conducting promotions, transfers and reallocations. Recommendation: DPS should reassess current procedures and controls to ensure compliance with HRS and County policy to establish fair and consistent hiring, promotions, transfers and reallocations. Because HRS assigns much of the policy- making authority to the Director of DPS, most procedures may not be specifically required by statute. Nonetheless, internal policies should be reviewed for best practices, clearly written, regularly communicated to DPS staff and held to the same standard of authority as HRS. DPS should not completely remove themselves from any personnel action procedure. If DPS decides to empower the departments, it should at least act in the capacity of record - keeper to keep itself involved with the process and maintain segregation of duties. This will also allow DPS to monitor the appointing authority to ensure all procedures are sufficiently followed. Auditee's Response: Agree. Prior to the restructuring of the Department of Human Resources (HR), individual departments were empowered with much of the recruitment and hiring decisions. In addition, prior to 2011, the NEOGOV online recruitment system was not used consistently among all departments. With the recent restructuring of the Department of Human Resources (HR), duties formally performed at the individual department level are now being done at HR for greater consistency and standardization. HR conducts reference checks for all employees new to the County (excluding sworn Kauai Police Department (KPD) staff), contacts selected applicants with conditional offers of employment, and schedules all necessary pre- employment requirements including drug tests, physicals, and background checks for those positions requiring this assessment (excluding sworn KPD staff). HR agrees that duties that remain with departments (interviewing, etc.) still require substantiation from the departments that proper procedures are followed. As such, HR will begin to require individual departments to submit the necessary documents to HR to ensure that necessary procedures were adhered to. 16 In addition, since 2011, all requests to fill vacant positions must go through the NEOGOV online recruitment system ensuring proper approvals occur prior to eligible applicant lists being referred to departments. A review of internal recruitment and hiring practices is underway that incorporates best practices, adheres to HRS and that will be communicated to all departments and HR staff once completed. Finding 2: The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to the risk of non- compliance with bargaining unit agreements, internal policy and HRS. Recommendation: DPS should maintain an audit trail of sufficient documentation to support all personnel activity during an employee's career with the County. All documents should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record - keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate their adherence to HRS and County policies for future audit examinations, comply with employee requests to exercise their right inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible dispute with employees. There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. Auditee's Response: Agree. With the recent restructuring of the Department of Human Resources (HR), employee files related to employment, pay and benefits are now centrally maintained at HR. The County Attorney's office is already working on a comprehensive policy regarding document retention for not only HR but all County departments with regards to varying public and personnel files. This policy will set the guidelines for HR and all departments to maintain necessary documents. The HRIS (Human Resources Information Systems) Task Force has been meeting for over a year now and continues to look at ways to streamline documents including new software that will assist with electronic recordkeeping. 17 Finding 3: A lack of controls surrounding certain procedures subjects the County to fraud risk. Recommendation: DPS should ensure sufficient controls and procedures are in place for all types of personnel action, in particular for those that allow civil service requirements to be bypassed as these subject the County to the greatest amount of risk. Auditee's Response: Agree. A review of HR's current positions that have been designated as "unskilled labor" as defined in the "Rules of the Director" will be undertaken and incorporated into revised internal recruitment and hiring practices policies and procedures and communicated to all departments and HR staff. HR agrees that aside from maintaining internal controls within HR, duties that remain with departments (interviewing, etc.) still require substantiation from the departments that proper procedures were followed. As such, HR will begin to require individual departments to submit the necessary documents to HR to ensure that necessary procedures were adhered to and not bypassed. Although exempt positions as defined under the HRS are exempt from civil service procedures, HR agrees that sufficient controls and procedures should be in place for all types of personnel action. With the recent restructuring of the Department of Human Resources (HR), all exempt positions go through the approval process via our NEOGOV online recruitment system. HR will begin to update policies and procedures to address controls and procedures for exempt appointments as well, and will be shares with all departments and HR staff. V J! AUDIT OF COUNTY PAYROLL SYSTEM Submitted by Office of the County Auditor County of Kauai State of Hawaii Report No. 15 =02 L� sc as �s -i3 b. ;, PREFACE This audit assesses whether the County of Kaua`'s payroll system is in compliance with rules and regulations and uniformly applied. This performance audit of the County's payroll system was designed to examine County programs to ensure accurate reporting, appropriate application of pay scales and to identify areas for process improvement. We would like to thank all who contributed data to this report, especially the Information Technology section of the Department of Finance and the Department of Personnel Services. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 Introduction Background Audit Objectives and Scope The County of Kauai Payroll Process Audit Methodology CHAPTER 2 Audit Findings and Recommendations 1 3 6 6 6 6 7 8 10 10 Finding 1. The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to the risk of non - compliance with bargaining unit agreements. 10 Finding 2. employees. The County applied incorrect pay or benefit rates resulting in overpayments to 12 Finding 3. Certain County personnel have the ability to make changes in both the hiring and payroll systems, resulting in a lack of proper segregation of duties. 13 AUDITEE RESPONSE 0 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PKF Pacific Hawaii LLP ( "PKF" or "we ") has completed an audit of the County of Kaua`i's ( "County") payroll system and procedures under contract with the Office of the County Auditor. The performance audit examined the County-wide payroll system during the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. The audit was designed to answer: • Are the County's controls and policies related to payroll activities adequately and appropriately operating to assure the County is in compliance with applicable rules and regulations? • Are the County's policies and procedures uniformly and consistently applied throughout the County to ensure that pay and benefits are accurate, appropriate, earned and paid to its employees? and • Has the County established appropriate rules, policies and procedures to safeguard County assets, provide appropriate checks and balances and ensure the accountability of government? The audit findings and recommendations are summarized as follows: Finding I: The amount of supporting documentation maintained by Department of Personnel Services ("DPS") is inconsistent and could expose the County to risk of non- compliance with bargaining unit agreements, Employee files are not centrally and securely maintained. There were many instances of missing documents due to lack of record retention and poor transitions of duties and responsibilities as payroll personnel turnover occurred. Documentation for benefit elections were not maintained prior to 2013. Recommendation: DPS should maintain accurate and complete employee files, especially when it comes to benefit elections. All documents related to employment, pay and benefits should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record - keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate changes in rates or benefits for future audit examinations, employee requests to exercise their right to inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible disputes with employees. i;3 There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. Further, there likely would not have been as many instances of missing documents had the County adequately transitioned the duties and responsibilities of payroll personnel as turnover occurred. It was frequently noted during our testing that documents could not be located due to uncertainty regarding their location as previous payroll employees may have had a different filing system, record retention policy or documentation maintenance system. Procedures should be consistently applied from one employee to the next to avoid this confusion. A sufficient transition period and training would ensure that the organization consistently follows best practices regardless of employee turnover. Finding 2: The County applied incorrect pay or benefit rates resulting in overpayments to employees. Pay rates and benefit elections are not timely updated and documentation for the changes are missing or unsecured. Recommendation: Pay rates and benefit elections should be updated in the County's AS400 Payroll system ( "the AS400" or "the payroll system ") in a timely manner and documentation for all such changes should be maintained in the employee's file in a secured location. We recommend that DPS monitor benefit payments and evaluate these instances of overpayment to see if adjustments need to be'applied. Finding 3: Certain County personnel have the ability to make changes in both the hiring and payroll systems, resulting in a lack of proper segregation of duties. Certain employees outside the payroll function are capable of creating positions requisitions, adding new users and updating user permissions, among other user rights. They also have the ability to reapply base rates, rebuild hours, override and make pay adjustments. Though they cannot create new employees themselves, personnel outside of the payroll function should not have the ability to adjust an employee's pay rate due to the potential for fraud. ll Recommendation: Though the merging of the hiring and payroll processes under the same department itself does not violate the principles of segregation of duties, the IT systems for the human resource ( "HR ") and payroll functions should remain completely segregated from each other. Those who have access to one should be limited to read-only rights in the other. The involvement of a department in the payroll process should be limited to time reporting and reviewing and approving the preliminary payroll report.. Payroll should be the only personnel with the ability to adjust an employee's pay rate. This should ensure no one with the ability to hire an employee has the ability to pay them as well. With adequate internal control and segregation of duties remaining a priority, DPS should consider establishing and communicating at definitive vision and business plan as well as re- analyzing its operations and structural hierarchy. DPS should subsequently determine if integrating certain aspects of the payroll and hiring processes could improve efficiency and reduce costs now that both are under the same department.. 5 Introduction This audit was conducted pursuant to the authority of the Office of the County Auditor, as provided in the County Charter, Background This performance audit examines the County payroll system for compliance, efficiency and accuracy. Performance audits provide information to improve program operations and facilitate decision making. For a complete definition of performance audits see Government Auditing Standards section 2.10. Audit Objectives and Scope The audit was designed to answer the following questions: • Are the County's controls and policies related to payroll activities adequately and appropriately operating to assure the County is in compliance with applicable rules and regulations? • Are the County's policies and procedures uniformly and consistently applied throughout the County to ensure that pay and benefits are accurate, appropriate, earned and paid to its employees? and • Has the County established appropriate rules, policies and procedures to safeguard County assets, provide appropriate checks and balances and ensure the accountability of government? The period under evaluation spanned from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013. Our scope included all pay periods during this time period. Controls and access rights in the AS400 were also considered. rol The County of Kauai Payroll Process DPS has been processing payroll since July 1, 2014. Three employees who process payroll were transferred to DPS as of July 2014; the Central Payroll Accountant, Accountant III and the Payroll Specialist. Prior to this, the payroll function and positions were part of the Department of Finance. The County begins its payroll processing once each department has entered its time in the AS400. The AS400 is a password protected payroll- processing software that contains a digital profile of all county employees including the employee's department, position, pay grade and benefit elections. DPS uses this system to process their payroll. Updates to employee data are made by the Payroll Administrator and Accountant III when an EC4 form is received and signed by the employee and departmental personnel officer. Out of.19 departments, nine submit a signed, detailed summary of their employees' hours to the DPS. The Payroll Specialist enters the time in the AS400 on the departments' behalf, while the remaining departments submit their time via the AS400. A signed Hours Proof Listing is submitted by all departments to DPS, which summarizes the department's hours by pay code. Changes to hours input can be made up until the Preliminary Payroll report is generated by the Central Payroll Accountant. The Preliminary Payroll report is sent to each department's payroll clerk for review but are only returned if errors are noted by the payroll clerk. At this point, the departments are unable to make any further changes in the AS400. Additional corrections may be made with approval from the Payroll Administrator and Accountant III up to two days prior to processing payroll. When the final payroll register is run, DPS compares it to the signed Hours Proof Listing to ensure no unauthorized changes were made during payroll processing. After payroll is finalized, a fiscal officer from the Department of Finance authorizes the release of County funds. The EUTF bills DPS for the benefits who, in turn, bills the individual departments. The IT Department prints the payroll checks, which are housed and issued by the Department of Finance. For the employees who have not elected direct deposit, their department must sign for, and pick up, the checks at DPS. Checks issued are for the work performed in the prior period as the County is on a one period pay lag. Pay rates and benefits are negotiated between the County and the individual BUs. The BU agreements list employee rights, grievance procedures, types of pay, types of leave, allowable expense reimbursements and types of benefits and their rates. Non -BU employees receive comparable rates based on the BU agreements or individual service contracts. The table below lists the types of BUs associated with the County. N COUNTY OF KAUA'I BARGAINING UNITS 1 Blue collar workers 2 7 Blue collar supervisors 3 White collar workers 4 White collar supervisors 11 Fire fighters 12 Police officers 13 Professionals and scientists Audit Methodology We developed an overall audit plan and risk -based strategy to approach and address the audit objectives, which included three distinct stages: planning, fieldwork and reporting. The planning stage involved obtaining an understanding of the County's payroll system and process. Through telephone conferences and written requests, we reviewed documents prepared by DPS including payroll process checklists, memorandums and executive orders among other documentation to familiarize ourselves with the County's payroll process. We also utilized our employee benefit plan and financial audit resources to help identify key controls and high -risk areas in the payroll process, as well as establish a benchmark against which to test. We reviewed the County's organizational chart and position descriptions to select key personnel to interview and walk us through the payroll process. On November 18, 2014, we met with the Payroll Administrator and Accountant III to get a better understanding of the payrol l process, the AS400 and internal controls, including segregation of duties, within the department. To review internal controls within DPS' IT systems, we requested a listing of those with access to the AS400 and those with access to NeoGov, the hiring and personnel software used by DPS, along with their user rights and permissions in each system. We compared the lists to determine whether anyone had access to both systems and if proper segregation of duties had been implemented. We randomly selected five departments, one for each pay period in our sample to test hours input procedure within the payroll process. For each department, we reviewed the hours proof listing for proper sign -off by the Payroll Clerk and agreed the hours to the payroll register for each pay period. We also reviewed the Fiscal Officer's approval of the release of funds for each pay period in our sample as part of our test of the overall payroll process. To test the accuracy of employee pay and benefits, we identified a population from which to sample. The population was defined as all pay periods within the time period under scope. We randomly selected one pay period from each year and requested a comprehensive list of county employees along with their salaries and bargaining units (`BU "). We randomly chose one employee from each BU and one non -BU employee from each pay period for a total of 40 unique sample items to test payroll reporting. We recalculated the pay and benefits for each employee in our sample using the hours reported on the payroll register and the salary schedules from the BU agreements. We used the grade and step from the employee's Payroll Certification ( "PC ") as of each pay period sampled to determine the correct rate on the salary schedule. For each employee in our sample, we agreed the employer portion of benefits paid per the payroll register to the Hawaii Employer -Union Health Benefits Trust Fund ( "EUTF ") Monthly Insurance Premium Rates schedules based on the employee's EC -1 benefit election form. We followed -up on any issues noting mitigating circumstances and controls. Remaining findings were noted in Chapter 2 of this report. To test the overall payroll process, we reviewed the fiscal officer's approval of the release of funds for each pay period in our sample and randomly chose one department from each period and agreed the hours per the signed Hours Proof Listing to the payroll register. We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Information deemed confidential under the Hawaii state open records law (Hawai`i Revised Statutes ( "HRS ") chapter 92F) was omitted from this report. The determination of whether information was confidential was based on Office of Information Practices ( "OIP ") Guideline No. 3, effective September 7, 2011 and O1P memorandum dated May 1, 2002, "OIP Guidance Regarding Disclosure of Agency Records and Information to Auditors." Under the guidance of these documents, the following were omitted as confidential: employee social security numbers and actual base rates of pay and gross salaries for employees covered by or included in bargaining units as defined in the Hawaii collective bargaining law (HRS chapter 76). E CHAPTER 2 Audit Findings and Recommendations Finding 1. The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to the risk of non - compliance with bargaining unit agreements. Despite multiple follow up requests for support, one of the most prevalent and pervasive issues during our testing was the lack of documentation maintained by DPS, in particular for benefit elections. DPS disclosed to us that documentation for benefit elections had not been maintained prior to 2013. Of the 40 employees we tested, 38 had at least one benefit or pay item where DPS was unable to provide supporting documentation for a total of 81 instances. The details of our findings are presented in the table below. INSTANCES OF UNSUPPORTED BENEFIT ELECTIONS OR PAY H Benefit Ret Other Pst Benefits paid to cover employee 38 Ret- Medical medical expenses after retirement. Benefit Retirement Employer contributions for 23 (Regular employees who participate in Employee, Fire, the State retirement system. Police Pay Temporary Additional pay for employees 12 Assignment who temporarily fill and serve _ _ in a position above their own. Employee's election for life B enefit Health Fund 5 Life Ins insurance. Pay Fire Rescue Additional pay for employees 2 Specialist; who serve in search and rescue Hazard missions and hazardous Assignment Employee's Pay Base salary paid to employee. 1 Basic Pa H Though there appeared to be adequate authorization and review of changes in employee status, pay rates and benefit elections, there did not seem to be an independent verification of time entry. Departments ultimately certify their own time input during the preliminary payroll approval process. Without independent verification or support to show approval of additional hours, the County is left susceptible to both error and fraud. Further, all County BU agreements include a clause providing employees the right to inspect their personnel files. Based on our findings, the County may have risked violating the BU agreements if a dispute over benefits had arisen, or if an employee had requested to see any of the missing support in the table above between 2009 and 2013. In addition, six of 39 EC -1 benefit election forms were signed after the pay period we selected for testing. Although the benefit elections matched the rates reported on each employee's payroll register, there was no way to confirm these were the actual benefits elected at the time payroll was processed as they were signed after the fact. As we tested the overall payroll process, we noted discrepancies between the billings from the EUTF to DPS and the subsequent billing from DPS to the departments. DPS partially substantiated this by explaining the EUTF is not always up to date and, for example, will continue to bill for benefits for an employee who terminated. DPS noted, however, the EUTF will usually correct their error on subsequent billings. After several requests, DPS was ultimately unable to reconcile and quantify the difference in billings. Finally, we noted eight instances where both BU and non -BU employee pay could not be substantiated beyond their PC. The PC acts as the County's input sheet into the AS400 for basic employee data including position title, class and grade, pay rate and other demographic information. It is derived from various source documents including the BU agreements and is signed by both the appointing authority and the Director of DPS. Though we agreed the employee's pay from the payroll register to their PC, we were subsequently unable to use their step and grade from their PC to vouch their pay to the salary schedule from their BU agreement. We were therefore unable to verify the accuracy of their pay and determine the extent of any potential over or under payments by the County. Recommendation: DPS should maintain accurate and complete employee files, especially when it comes to benefit elections. All documents related to employment, pay and benefits should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record - keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate changes in rates or benefits for future audit examinations, employee requests to exercise their right to inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible disputes with employees. There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. Further, there likely would not have been as many instances of missing documents had the County adequately transitioned the duties and responsibilities of payroll personnel as turnover occurred. It was frequently noted during our testing that documents could not be located due to uncertainty regarding their location as previous payroll employees may have had a different filing system, record retention policy or documentation maintenance system. Procedures should be consistently applied from one employee to the next to avoid this confusion. A sufficient transition period and training would ensure that the organization consistently follows best practices regardless of employee turnover. Finding 2. The County applied incorrect pay or benefit rates resulting in overpayments to employees. Our testing revealed a total of 43 instances in which pay and benefits were improperly applied to the 40 employees in our sample. Nine of the findings were due to incorrect application of rates for various types of pay, which affected five of the 40 employees we tested and resulted in approximately $1,400 in overpayment by the County as shown in the table below. INCORRECTLY APPLIED PAY RATES The remaining 34 instances were comprised of benefits that, according to the employee's EC -1, were applied but not elected or had a rate assigned from either the wrong type of plan (e.g. two -party vs individual vs family plans, etc.) 12 Rate applied does not 7 $118.63 Employee's basic pay, leave appear in BU salary without pay, standby pay, night schedule. alarm a and rest period pay. Wrong pay class or 2 $1,265.50 Employee's basic pay. grade applied. Total Pay Rates 9 $1,384.13 Net overpayment. Applied Incorrectly. The remaining 34 instances were comprised of benefits that, according to the employee's EC -1, were applied but not elected or had a rate assigned from either the wrong type of plan (e.g. two -party vs individual vs family plans, etc.) 12 or the wrong BU agreement. The 34 instances affected 10 of the 40 employees who had an average of 3.4 benefits incorrectly calculated out of a possible seven different benefit elections. As mentioned in the prior finding, DPS did not maintain documentation for benefit elections prior to 2013. Breakdowns of the various types of errors encountered are provided below. INCORRECTLY APPLIED BENEFITS Recommendation: Pay rates and benefit elections should be updated in the AS400 in a timely manner and documentation for all such changes should be maintained in the employee's file in a secured location. We recommend that DPS monitor benefit payments and evaluate these instances of overpayment to see if adjustments need to be applied. Finding 3. Certain County personnel have the ability to make changes in both the hiring and payroll systems, resulting in a lack of proper segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is a key component of effective internal control and consists of the Authorization, Custody and Record Keeping functions. The principle behind segregation of duties is to isolate key operating functions in a business so no single individual or entity is able to bypass internal controls or perpetrate fraud. During our review of IT controls, we noted 23 employees who have access to both the AS400 and NeoGov. Eight of these employees are representatives from requesting departments that are classified as Hiring Liaisons in NeoGov. These employees are capable of creating position requisitions, adding new users and updating user permissions, among other user rights. The eight liaisons also have access rights to the hours entry function in the AS400, which 13 Rates from wrong BU 19 ($64.31) Medical, drug, dental and and wrong plan applied. vision coverage, Medical, drug, dental and Rates from wrong BU 8 $79.47 plied. vision coverage. Did not elect benefit on 6 $1,191.41 Life insurance, retirement EC -1 but was given contributions, retirement anyway. medical contributions, drug coverage. Life insurance. Benefit elected but not 1 ($2.08) aid. Total Benefits Applied 34 $1,204.49 Net overpayment. Incorrectly. Recommendation: Pay rates and benefit elections should be updated in the AS400 in a timely manner and documentation for all such changes should be maintained in the employee's file in a secured location. We recommend that DPS monitor benefit payments and evaluate these instances of overpayment to see if adjustments need to be applied. Finding 3. Certain County personnel have the ability to make changes in both the hiring and payroll systems, resulting in a lack of proper segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is a key component of effective internal control and consists of the Authorization, Custody and Record Keeping functions. The principle behind segregation of duties is to isolate key operating functions in a business so no single individual or entity is able to bypass internal controls or perpetrate fraud. During our review of IT controls, we noted 23 employees who have access to both the AS400 and NeoGov. Eight of these employees are representatives from requesting departments that are classified as Hiring Liaisons in NeoGov. These employees are capable of creating position requisitions, adding new users and updating user permissions, among other user rights. The eight liaisons also have access rights to the hours entry function in the AS400, which 13 gives them the ability to reapply base rates, rebuild hours, override and make pay adjustments. Those with the ability to create an employee should not be able to pay them as well. Though Hiring Liaisons are incapable of creating new employees themselves, personnel outside of DPS should not have the ability to adjust an employee's pay rate. While we did not observe any lack of segregation of duties within DPS, we did note during our interviews that no formal action plan had been established either prior to or during the merger of the payroll and hiring functions under DPS to ensure a seamless transition. Both functions appeared to continue to operate independently of each other without a clear direction of the goals or vision of the department. Recommendation: Though the merging of the hiring and payroll processes under the same department itself does not violate the principles of segregation of duties, the IT systems for the HR and payroll functions should,remain completely segregated from each other. Those who have access to one should be limited to read -only rights in the other. The involvement of a department in the payroll process should be limited to time reporting and reviewing and approving the preliminary payroll report. Payroll should be the only personnel with the ability to adjust an employee's pay rate. This should ensure no one with the ability to hire an employee has the ability to pay them as well. With adequate internal control and segregation of duties remaining a priority, DPS should consider establishing and communicating a definitive vision and business plan as well as re- analyzing its operations and structural hierarchy. DPS should subsequently determine if integrating certain aspects of the payroll and hiring processes could improve efficiency and reduce costs now that both are under the same department. 14 Finding 1: The amount of supporting documentation maintained by DPS is inconsistent and could expose the County to risk of non - compliance with bargaining unit agreements, Recommendation: DPS should maintain accurate and complete employee files, especially when it comes to benefit elections. All documents related to employment, pay and benefits should be aggregated and maintained in a single, secured file for each employee. These files should be kept on hand for record - keeping purposes and not be replaced with updated versions or discarded after an employee terminates. The County would consequently be able to substantiate changes in rates or benefits for future audit examinations, employee requests to exercise their right to inspect their personnel file and resolve any possible disputes with employees. There are numerous sources of governance that dictate document retention and maintenance requirements at the federal, state and county levels. DPS should consult with the County Attorney to implement a comprehensive policy that ensures compliance with these standards. Further, there likely would not have been as many instances of missing documents had the County adequately transitioned the duties and responsibilities of payroll personnel as turnover occurred. It was frequently noted during our testing that documents could not be located due to uncertainty regarding their location as previous payroll employees may have had a different filing system, record retention policy or documentation maintenance system. Procedures should be consistently applied from one employee to the next to avoid this confusion. A sufficient transition period and training would ensure that the organization consistently follows best practices regardless of employee turnover. Auditee's Response: Agree. With the recent restructuring of the Department of Human Resources (HR) including the transfer of central payroll functions, employee files related to employment, pay and benefits are now centrally maintained at HR. Cross training is already in progress at HR to ensure seamless transitions when employees separate from the County or on extended leaves. 15 The County Attorney's office is already working on a comprehensive policy regarding document retention for not only HR but all County departments with regards to varying public and personnel files. Finding 2: The County applied incorrect pay or benefit rates resulting in overpayments to employees. Recommendation: Pay rates and benefit elections should be updated in the AS400 in a timely manner and documentation for all such changes should be maintained in the employee's file in a secured location. We recommend that DPS monitor benefit payments and evaluate these instances of overpayment to see if adjustments need to be applied. Auditee's Response: Agree. With the recent restructuring Department of Human Resources (HR), payroll transactions are now being generated centrally at HR (versus at the various departments). A flowchart that depicts the work flow processing has been developed and anticipated payroll transactions are tracked to be processed one (1) month before the effective date. Reliance on departments for operational changes still present a challenge for timely processing. Payroll staff will monitor and audit transactions including benefits during every payroll cycle to ensure accurate payments. Departments will be required to submit a summary of payroll entries as a check to the payroll hours proof form that is already being submitted. Payroll staff will continue to work with the Employer -Union Health Benefits Trust Fund (EUTF) to obtain accurate and detailed billing information to ensure that health insurance premiums paid out correctly reflect the County's financial obligations. Finding 3: Certain County personnel have the ability to make changes in both the hiring and payroll systems, resulting in a lack of proper segregation of duties. Recommendation: Though the merging of the hiring and payroll processes under the same department itself does not violate the principles of segregation of duties, the IT systems for the HR and payroll functions should remain completely segregated from each other. Those who have access to one should be limited to read -only rights in the other. The involvement of a department in the payroll process should be limited to time reporting and reviewing and approving the preliminary payroll report. Payroll should be the only personnel 16 f with the ability to adjust an employee's pay rate. This should ensure no one with the ability to hire an employee has the ability to pay them as well. With adequate internal control and segregation of duties remaining a priority, DPS should consider establishing and communicating a definitive vision and business plan as well as re- analyzing its operations and structural hierarchy. DPS should subsequently determine if integrating certain aspects of the payroll and hiring processes could improve efficiency and reduce costs now that both are under the same department. Auditee's Responses Agree. The Department of Human Resources (HR) has been working diligently with the Department of Finance-Information Systems to develop appropriate security access for the various HR functions while maintaining an adequate level of backup support. Changes have aleady been made to provide read -only access to specific HR staff who are not involved with personnel and payroll transactions. The HRIS (Human Resources Information Systems) Task Force has been meeting for over a year now and continues to look at merging the different aspects of payroll and personnel, thereby creating greater efficiencies. Auditor's Comments While DPS is taking steps to ensure the appropriate security access and internal controls are in place to prevent payroll fraud, DPS should remain vigilant of the inherent risks associated with combining payroll and personnel functions under the same department. In addition, payroll personnel should leverage resources from the Department of Finance for any complex tax issues and other payroll- related compliance measures to the extent needed. DPS should further ensure that its personnel have the appropriate experience and training to carry out its implementation plan. This includes having adequate succession planning procedures in place in the event of the attrition of key personnel.: 17 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR'S REPORT TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AUGUST 2015 The final quarterly report for the fiscal year 2014 -2015 that included new hires, reallocations, promotions, transfers and vacancies for the period April 2015 -June 2015 was submitted to the County Council (see attached). With the passage of the budget ordinance for fiscal year 2015 -2016, the County Council included additional requirements in the budget proviso, Section 19 with regards to this quarterly report on new hires, reallocations, promotions, transfers and vacancies. Unfortunately, due to privacy rights of applicants and employees of the County of Kaua` i, an amendment is currently at the County Council to amend Section 19 of the budget proviso to narrow the scope of the report as well as to provide the report only during appropriate times during the fiscal year when the information is most useful (December and March). The County Council requested additional information in response to PKF Pacific Hawaii LLP's County Hiring Practice Audit and Payroll Audit. Responses to their questions are being completed for review by the Managing Director for submittal to the County Council. Because the scope of the audit looked at a particular snapshot in time, many of the findings were corrected in subsequent payrolls but were not addressed by the auditors. Interviews for the Human Resources Specialist I and Human Resources Specialist II positions were conducted recently with recommendations for hire forthcoming. A meeting was held with HR Directors, Mayors and the Governor to discuss negotiations strategies and issues as we begin to enter into the next round of contract talks for all bargaining units. Other meeting topics included the Unit 14 (HGEA) arbitration and the Unit 11 (HFFA) reopeners being discussed. Following are highlights and statistics from the various divisions: Administrative Services and Benefits • An additional amendment to FIRMS' (First Risk Management Services) contract no. 8504 for the continuation of third party administrator services for the remainder of the fiscal year workers' compensation claims is being processed with FY2016 funding. • Final meetings with the HRIS On- Boarding module implementation consultant were completed this month; anticipate going live with this system in September. • Departments were notified of the annual pre - retirement workshop which is scheduled for September 8, 2015. Invitations were extended to state agencies as well including the DOE, HHSC, KCC and the Judiciary. • New Hires: Agricultural Land Use Inspector Deputy County Attorney (exempt) Field Operations Clerk (exempt) Fire Fighter Trainee (5) Information Technology Project Coordinator Police Services Officer (7) Recycling Specialist Trainee Senior Account Clerk Exit Interviews Conducted: 5 of 10 • TDI Applications 2 (approved) • Leave Sharing: l(approved) • Reference Checks: 10 • Transactions: New Hires 7 Separations 6 Reallocations 35 Promotions 3 Demotions 0 Transfers 7 Pay Increase 563 .Suspension 1 Leave Without Pay 26 Other 402 Seasonal 13 Classification and Pay and Labor Relations • Step II class grievance filed by UPW regarding the Standard Operating Procedures for Stand -By Pay for the Department of Water; hearing was held on August 5ch • Reallocations Processed: Commission Support Clerk to Planning Program Manager Development Plan Project Assistant to TVR Permit Enforcement Research Specialist Long Range Planning Contract Management Specialist to 2 Development Plan Project Assistant Fire Fighter I to Fire Fighter Trainee (5) Groundskeeper to Tree Trimmer Lifeguard to Water Safety Officer II Police Services Officer to Police Officer I Real Property Appraiser II to Real Propert y Appraiser I Refuse Collection Crew Leader to Refuse Collection Equipment Operator (2) Refuse Collection Crew Leader to Solid Waste Worker II (3) Refuse Collector to Refuse Collection Equipment Operator Refuse Collector to Solid Waste Worker I (8) Refuse Collector to Solid Waste Worker II Risk Management Insurance Coordinator to Real Property Appraiser I Solid Waste Worksite Attendant to Solid Waste Worker I (11) Truck Driver to Refuse Collection Equipment Operator Water Safety Officer II to Lifeguard Recruitment and Exam • Assisted in preparing responses to the County Council regarding the Audit of County Hiring Practices' findings including researching with other jurisdictions regarding their pre - employment physical/drug screening requirements, exempt hiring and labor registration processes. • Assisted KPD and Public Works with the development of interview questions and participated as a interview panelist for one of KPD's positions. • Recruitments: Accounting Assistant Community Service Worker County Auditor (exempt) Deputy Manager- Engineer (exempt) Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (exempt) Emergency Services Dispatcher I Human Resources Specialist I Human Resources Specialist 11 Liquor Control Investigator Trainee Long Range Division Project Assistant Plumber I Police Services Officer Program Specialist II (Aging) Sewer Maintenance Repairer I Supervising Building Plans Examiner • Lists Referred to Departments: Account Clerk Bus Driver (exempt) Deputy County Attorney (exempt) Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (exempt) 3 • Written Exams Administered: Payroll Human Resources Specialist I Human Resources Specialist II Long Range Division Project Assistant Police Services Officer Project Manager Real Property Appraiser I Senior Clerk Community Service Worker Liquor Control Investigator Police Services Officer Senior Clerk * Assisted in preparing responses to the County Council regarding the Audit of County Payroll System's findings including researching with other jurisdictions regarding their handling of EUTF billing security requirements. • Working with various departmental payroll staff to stress the importance of payroll processing and verification of hours entry to prevent overpayments and future adjustments, • Processed pay increases. effective July 1, 2015 for HFFA, SHOPO and HGEA Units 2, 3, and 4. Employee Development and Health Services « Workers' compensation claims and liability claims continue to be reviewed through the completion of safety assessments and follow up with respective departments for further action including changes to operational policies and procedures, disciplinary action or further training. • Due to the fatal accident of one of our employees at the landfill, staff assisted the department with reporting the accident to HIOSH, collecting the requested documentation for the HIOSH investigator, and also coordinated counseling sessions with our Employee Assistance Program (Program) vendor for the employees involved. • Conducted investigation into employee complaint of workplace violence, harassment, and retaliation. • Working with Kauai Medical Clinic regarding the issues that the County faces with back dated doctor's certificates and lack of information on doctor's certificates. • Session with federal mediator for situation at Finance was cancelled due to one of the employee's resignation; scheduling another session with the federal mediator for another session at another department. • Equipment/Driver Training: Truck Tractor #151, #138, #144, and #139 (2 Public Works' employees) E4 I Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr. Mayor Nadine K. Nakamura Managing Director July 20, 2015 TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES County of Kauai, State of Hawaii 4444 Rice Street, Suite 140, Lihu`e, Hawaii 96766 TEL (808) 241 -4956 FAX (808) 241 -6593 Chair Mel Rapozo, County Council Janine M.Z. Rapozo, Director of Human Resources Nadine K. Nakamura, Managing April -June 2015 Quarterly Report Janine M.Z. Rapozo Director As per Section 19 of the FY 2014 -2015 budget ordinance, attached is the April -June 2015 quarterly report that includes new hires, transfers, reallocations, promotions and vacancies for the fourth quarter. Thank you. Att. ANEQUAL OPPORTUNITYEMPLOYER BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 -JUNE 2015 [a: C TI.II:kM Position Number Department/Wvision Current-PositlonTide Current�'Salanj Rahn Current Annual J4stiflcation Fundinfl Source Effective Oate E -8 Council Services County Clerk EXEMPT 114 848 Vacant since 05/01 15 General Funds 05/06 15 E -9 Council Services Deputy County Clerk EXEMPT $98t748 Vacant since 05/06/15 General Funds 05/06/15 747 Fire-Ocean Safe Lifeguard SR -13 32,460 Vacant since 04 /01/15 General Funds 06/1611S 748 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR -13 $32,460 Vacant since 06/01/15 General Funds 06/16/15 1863 Fire-Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR -13 $32,460 Vacant since 04/02/13 General Funds OS OS /15 2524 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR -13 32,460 Vacant since 02/01/15 General Funds 05/01/15 LT -2534 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR -13 $32,460 Vacant since 02/26/15 General Funds 06/16/15 10468 Fire-Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR -13 $32,460 Vacant since 02/01/15 General Funds 06 /16/15 2206 Liquor Senior Account Clerk SR -13 $32,460 Vacant since 02/25/15 Liquor Fund 05/01/15 E -80 Mayor's Office Executive Assistant to the Mayor EM -5 $99,840 Vacant since 03117/15 General Fund 05 /01/15 E -81 Ma oes Office Boards & Commissions Admnstr EXEMPT $96,000 Vacant since 05/01/15 General Fund 05/01115 E -61 OED Economic Development IV SR -24 75,960 Vacant since 05/01115 General Fund 05/01/15 E -98 OED Economic Development IV SR -24 $67,512 Vacant since 12/31/14 General Fund 051 01/15 1885 Parks & Rec -Maint Park Caretaker I BC -2 $35t964 Vacant since 12/31/14 General Fund 04/16/15 1982 Parks & Rec -Maint Park Caretaker I BC -2 $35,964 Vacant since 9/30/15 General Fund 04/16115 1893 Parks & Rec -Rec Pool Guard SR43 $32,460 Vacant since 08/1S/14 General Fund 06/16/1S E -27 Planning Deputy Planning Director EXEMPT $98,748 Vacant since 02/21/15 General Fund OS/01/15 362 Police Secrete SR -16 $36,468 Vacant since 11/11/13 General Fund 05/19/15 491 Police Police Evidence Custodian I SR -14 33,720 Vacant since 12/09/14 General Fund 05/26115 E -94 Prosecuting Attorney First Deputy Prosecuting Attorney EXEMPT $105,660 Vacant since 06/01/15 General Fund 06/01/15 9091 Prosecuting Attorney Special Prosecuting Attorney EXEMPT 75,000 Vacant since 06101/15 General Fund 06/16/15 2807 Prosecuting Attomey Legal Clerk III SR44 $371980 Vacant since 03/03/15 General Fund 05/01/15 2826 Prosecuting Attorney l Clerk Ill SR -14 $33,720 Vacant since 04/16/15 General Fund 05/18/15 2827 Prosecuting Attorney Legal Clerk II SR -12 31,236 Vacant since 03 16/15 General Fund 05/18/15 1016 Public Works-Bldgs Plumber 1 BC -10 $50,052 Vacant since 10/29/14 General Fund 05/01/15 1429 Public Works-Eng Engineering Support Tech III SR -17 $37,980 Vacant since 07/09/14 General Fund 1876 Public Works -En Civil Engineer V SR -26 $75,960 Vacant since 02/14/15 General Fund 9332 Transportation Payroll Clerk SR -10 $28,872 Vacant since 02/18/15 General Fund 9456 Transportation Transit Fleet Mechanic BC -8 $45,024 Vacant since 08/18/14 General Fund H04/01/15 2305 Water Customer Service Re resentative I SR -11 $29,988 Vacant since 03 14/15 Water Fund 2499 Water Clerical Assistant SR -15 $35,112 Vacant since 10 3/14 Water Fund 2449 Water Automotive Mechanic I BC -10 $50 052 Vacant since 12/31/14 Water fund Excludes short-term (on -call, seasonal, 89 -day) Building Revolving Fund and Project Funded positions Page 1 of 1 BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 -JUNE 2015 TRANSFERS Position.XumbiK Dgwnm"t(DM,(slotl Current P4sitbnTitle Current a ift Rating. Current " - euaf SalaOr (ustifl ®tior► � dipgSaaree Effective,Qate 716 799 Fire Fire Fighter III SR -21 $68,796 Change In Battalion General Fund 06 /01/15 725 (774) Fire Fire Fighter III SR -21 $6B,796 Change in Battalion General Fund 04 /01/15 774 (798) Fire Fire fighter III SR -21 $71,556 Change in Battalion General Fund 04 /01/15 798 720) Fire Fire Fighter iii SR -21 $71,556 Change in Battalion General Fund 04 /01/15 606 636 Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $54,384 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 607 (628) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change In Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 625 (731) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change In Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 627 (794) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $58,812 Change in Battalion General Fund OS 01/15 628 (625) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $54,384 Change In Battalion General Fund 05 01 /15 629 (765) Fire Fire Fighter i SR -17 $54,384 Change in Battalion General Fund 05 /01/15 631 (767) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $52,308 Change In Battalion General Fund 05 /01/15 636 (632) Fire Fire Fi ter I SR -17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund OS /01/15 731(629) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change In Battalion General Fund 05 /01/15 735 (630) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR-17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 765 (606) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 767 (631) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 770 (775) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05 /01/15 773 (607) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $52,308 Chan a in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 775 (780) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 780 (770) Fire Fire Fighter I SR-17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 787 (773 ) Fire Fire Fighter i SR -17 $541384 Change In Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 791(735 ) Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 $52,308 Change in Battalion General Fund 05/01/15 794 (627) Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 $521308 Change In Battalion General Fund OS /01/15 1650 (10468) Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR -13 $36,468 Change in Position Number General Fund 06 /01/15 1829(2S25) Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer 11 SR -17 $39,492 Change In Tower General Fund 56 /01/15 2525 1650 Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer I SR -15 35,112 Change in Tower General Fund 06 /01/15 2528 (1829) Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer II SR -17 $390492 Change in Tower General Fund 06/01/15 2530 (748) Fire-Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer II SR -17 $39,492 Change in Tower General Fund 06 /01/15 LT -2533 (1829 ) Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer II SR -17 $39,492 Change In Tower General Fund 06/22/15 10470 (2530) Fire-Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer 11 SR -17 $39,492 Change in Tower General Fund 06 /01/15 2002 (2021) Planning Land Use Permit Technician SR -15 $36,468 To General Fund position General Fund 06 /01/15 23 (371) Police Assistant Chief of Police EM -7 $116,652 Change in Bureau General Fund 06/07/15 371(23) Police Assistant Chief of Police EM -7 $119,868 Change in Bureau General Fund 06/07]15 417 (430 ) Police Police Sergeant (Detective) PO-11 $85,764 Change in Bureau General Fund 06 /07/15 430 (417 ) Police Detective (Police Sergeant ) P10011 $69,708 Change in Bureau General Fund 06 /07/15 504 (396) Police Detective (Police Sergeant ) PO -11 $75,516 Change in Bureau General Fund 06/07/15 376 (7-478 ) Police Police Services Officer P0-S $54,924 To General Fund position General Fund 06 /16/15 520 (T -476) Police Police Services Officer PO -5 $54,924 To General Fund position General Fund 05/01/15 580 (T -477) Police Police Services Officer PO -5 $54,924 To General Fund position General Fund 05/01/15 Includes changes in position numbers Information In parentheses represents former department /division, position, salary rating, salary, or funding Page 1 of 1 BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 -JUNE 2015 REALLOCATIONS Position•.f caber Department /Division Current Position7itfe Currenkplary Rat)ng Current Annual Salary Justification F4nliing$ource Effective Date 141 Eldedy Affairs Community Services Worker (Community Services Program Asst ) SR -9 (SR -13) $27,768 ($32,460 ) Recruit at lower level General Fund 247 Finance- Driver's License Driver License Clerk 11 (Driver License Clerk 1) SR -12 SR -11) $32,460 $31236) Career progression State Funds 106/16/15 04 /01/15 301 Finance - Driver's License Driver License Clerk II (Driver License Clerk I) SR -12 SR -11) $32�460($310236L Career progression General Fund 04/01/15 242 Finance- MVR/Treasu Senior Clerk (Vehicle Titles & Registration Technician ) SR -10 (SR -13 ) $28,872 ($420684 ) Recruit at lower level General Fund 05 /16/15 278 Finance- MVR/Treasu Vehicle Titles & Registration Technician (Treasury Support Clerk SR -13 (SR -11 ) $37,980 ($35j 112) Career progression General Fund 05/16/15 287 Finance-MVR/Treasury Treasu 5 ort Clerk Senior Clerk SR -11 SR -SO $290988 $280812 Career progression General Fund 05/16/15 627 Fire Fire Fighter I (Fire Fighter Trainee) SR -17 (SR -15 ) $520308 ($4813 8 Career progression General Fund 0S /01/15 628 Fire Fire Fighter 1 jFire F' hter Trainee SR -17 SR -15) M308 ($480348 ) Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 629 Fire Fire Fighter 1 Fire Fighter Trainee SR -17 SR -15 $52,308 $48,348) Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 630 Fire Fire Fighter I Fire Fighter Trainee SR -17 SR -15) $52,308 ($481348 ) Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 631 Fire Fire Fighter 1 Fire Fighter Trainee SR -17 SR -15) $520308 ($48 348 ) Career progression General Fund 05 /01/15 632 Fire Fire Fighter 1 Fire Fighter Trainee) SR -17 SR -15 $52,308 ($48,348) Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 767 Fire Fire Fighter I (Fire Fighter Trainee) SR -17 (SR -15) $52,308 ($480348 Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 735 Fire Fire Fighter I (Fire Fighter Trainee ) SR -17 (SR -15 ) $52,308 $480348 Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 739 Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer 11 (Water Safety Officer 1) SR -17 (SR -15) $39,492 $360468) Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 1036 Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer I I (Water Safety Officer I ) SR -17 (SR -15) $37 980 $35112 Career progression General Fund 05/01/15 1654 Fire-Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer II (Water Safety Officer I ) SR -17 (SR -15 ) $37,980 ($35,112) Career progression General Fund 05 /01/15 10470 Fire -Ocean Safety Water Safety Officer II (Lifeguard) SR -17 (SR -13 ) $39,492 ($32460) Operational needs General Fund 06/01/15 740 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer 11 SR -13 (SR -17 ) $35,112 $39,492 Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /01/15 747 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer II SR -13 SR -17) $32,460 $46,188) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /01/15 748 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer 11) SR -13 (SR -17 ) $32 460($3%492) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06/01/15 1650 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard (Water Safety Officer I ) SR -13 SR -15) $32,460 ($35,112) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /01/15 1829 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer II SR -13 (SR -17) $32p460 $390492 Recruit at lower level General Fund 06/22/15 2521 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer II) SR -13 SR -17 $320460 ($39,492) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06/01/15 LT -2532 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer 11 SR -13 SR -17 $32,460 ($39,492) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /01/15 LT -2534 Flre -Ocean Safety Lifeguard Water Safety Officer it SR -13 (SR -17) $32,460 $39,492 Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /01/15 9655 Housing Accountant I (Accountant 11 ) SR -18 (SR -20 ) $37,890 $43,812) Operational needs General Fund 06 /01/15 E -98 OED Economic Development Specialist IV Sustainabil' -Green Manager) SR -24 (EM-5) $67,512 ($98,796 Operational needs General Fund 05/01/15 1985 Parks & Rec -Maint Tree Trimmer Grounds Helper) BC-4 BC -1) $38,472 ($35 484) 1 Operational needs lGeneral Fund 05 /01 /15 1986 Parks & Rec -Maint Tree Trimming Heavy Truck & Aerial Platform O Grounds Het r BC -7 (BC -1 ) $43t272 $31484 Operational needs General Fund 05/01/15 Page 1 of 3 BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015- JUNE 2015 REALLOCATIONS Position Number Departmgnt/Divislon CurfentPositkmTitle Current Salary Raking Current Annual Salary Justification Funding,$ouEce Effectlw.Data 1666 Parks & Rec- Recreation Pool Guard (Swimming instructor SR -13 SR -10) $35,112 ($31,236 ) Career progression General Fund 04 /01/15 1893 Parks & Rec- Recreation Pool Guard Recreation Worker 1) SR -13 SR -11) $32,460 ($291988) rational needs General Fund 05/20/15 1897 Parks & Rec- Recreation Recreation Worker 11 Recreation Worker I SR -13 (SR -11 ) $32,460 $291988 Career progression General Fund 04 /01/15 2009 Planning Planner III (Planner II ) SR -20 SR -18 $45,576 $42,168 Career progression General Fund 01/16/15 23 Police Assistant Chief of Police (Deputy Chief of Police ) EM -7 EXEMPT $82 272 $105,660) Operational needs General Fund 04 /16/15 309 Police IT Project Coordinator (Program Support Technician I ) SR -24 (SR -11) $55,236 ($29,988) Operational needs General Fund 04/06/15 363 1 Police Police Officer I Police Services Officer PO -7 PO -5 $57,096 ($54,924) Career progression General Fund 05/05/15 366 Police Police Officer I Police Services Officer 130-7 (PO S) $57,096 ($54,924) Career o ression General Fund 05/05/15 368 Police Police Officer I Police Services Officer PO-7 PO -5 $57,096 ($54,924) Career progression General Fund 05/05/15 401 Police Police Officer I I Police Services Officer) PO -7 (PO -5) $571096 ($S4,924) Career progression General Fund 05/05/15 437 Police Police Officer I (Police Services Officer ) PO-7 PO-S) $57;096 $54 924 Career progression General Fund 05/05/15 510 Police Police Officer I Police Services Officer PO -7 PO -5 $57,096 $54,924) Career progression General Fund 05/05/15 531 Police Police Officer I Police Services Officer) 130-7 (130-5 ) $570096 $540924 Career progression General Fund 05/05 15 576 Police Police Officer I Police Services Officer) 130-7 (PO -5) $57,096 $54,924 Career progression General Fund 05/05/15 376 Police Police Services Officer Police Officer 1) PO-5 130-7 $540924 ($S7,096) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06/16/15 407 Police Police Services Officer Police Officer I PO -5 (PO -7) $54,924 ($570096 ) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06/16/15 512 Police Police Services Officer Police Officer I PO -5 PO -7 $54,924 $57,096) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06/16/15 520 Police Police Services Officer Police Officer i PO -5 130-7) $54,924 ($57,096) Recruit at lower level General Fund 05/01/15 547 Police Police Services Officer Police Officer 1) PO -5 (PO -7 ) $54,924 $57 096) Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /16/15 580 Police Police Services Officer Police Officer I PO -5 PO -7) $54,924 ($57,096 ) Recruit at lower level General Fund 05/01/15 T -2825 Prosecuting Attorney Victim/Witness Counselor Trainee ictim/Wintess Counselor II SR -18 SR -22 $400548 $47 400) Recruit at lower level Federal Funds 05/16/15 2827 1 Prosecuting Attorney i Clerk 11(Legal Clerk III ) SR -12 (SR -12) $31,236 ($33,720) Recruit at lower level General Fund 04 /01/15 2827 Prosecuting Attorney Senir Clerk (Lega I Clerk II) SR -10 (SR -12 ) 1$28,872 ($31236 ) 1 Recruit at lower level General Fund 06 /16/15 Page 2 of 3 BUDGET ORDINANCE • SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL2015 -JUNE 2015 REALLOCATIONS Position Number Department/Divisl *, Current PositkmTkle. Curtent.SalaryRating. CutrentAnnuaLSa(ary . Justiflcatlon FurlditSource Effe*6wQate'. 1849 Public Works -Bids Plumbing Inspector (Supervising Plumbing in ctor ) SR -19 (SR -23) $39,480 $46,176 Operational needs General Fund 04/16/15 1876 Public Works-Eng Civil Engineer V Civil Engineer it SR -26 (SR -20 ) $57,720 $430812 Operational needs General Fund 05 01/15 843 Public Works -Roads Laborer I Laborer II) BC -2 BC -3 $35,964 ($360972) Recruit at lower level Highway Fund 05 /01/15 901 Public Works -Roads Laborer I (Laborer II ) BC -2 (BC -3 ) $35,964 $36,972 Recruit at lower level Highway Fund 05/01/15 930 Public Works -Roads Equipment Operator I (Tractor Mower Operator) BC-6 BCC $41604 ($381472 ) Career progression Highway Fund 05/16/1S 1542 Public Works -Roads Traffic Signs & Markings Helper Laborer it BC -5 BC -3 $40,008 $36,972 Career progression Highway Fund 05/01/1S T -1980 Public Works -SW Recycling Specialist I (Recycling Specialist Trainee ) SR -16 SR -18) $37,464 ($40,548 ) Recruit at lower level General Fund 05/01/15 9332 Transportation Payroll Clerk Accountant iii SR -10 SR -22 $28,872 $47,400 Recruit at lower level General Fund 04 /01/15 Excludes temporary reallocations Information in parentheses represents former department/division, position, salary rating, salary, or funding Page 3 of 3 BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 -JUNE 2015 PROMOTIONS Positiop Number Department/Dhrislon, Currant Position Title Curren $alary Rating Curren Annum Salary Justification Funding .So" Effective Date 205 (290 ) Finance-Accounting Accountant III (Fiscal SpeciallsO SR -22 SR -1 5,488 $49 308 Accountant III position vacant since 01/31115 General Fund 06/01/15 153 (242) 740 (1666) Finance- MVR/rrea Fire -Ocean Safety Departmental Accounting Technician (Vehicle Titles & Registration Technician) lifeguard (Swimming Instructor) SR -15 (SR -13 ) SR -13 (SR -10 ) $46,188 20684) $35 112 $31,236 Departmental Accounting Technician position vacant since 12/31/14) Lifeguard Position vacant since 04 12/15 General Fund General Fund 04 16/15 06/16/15 10468 (1653) Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard (Swimming Instructor SR -13 SR -10 $36,468 ($32o460) Lifeguard position vacant since 02/16/1S General Fund 04/01/25 289 2465 Human Resources Human Resources Manager I (Human Resources Specialist II) EM -03 (SR -22) $67t692 $476400) Human Resources Manager position vacant since 02/01/15 General Fund 05/01/15 23 350 Police Assistant Chief of Police (Police C twin ) EM -7 I EM -3 $119,868 ($104,232 ) Assistant Chief of Police position vacant since 01AVIS General Fund 06 /07/15 3SO (416 ) Police Police Captain Police Lieutenant EM -3 I PO.13) $98,412 ($89,460 Police Captain position vacant since 12/01/14 ) und 06 /07/15 403 (410) Police Police Captain Police Lieutenan EM -3 (PO-13 $98,412 $89,460 Police Captain Position vacant since 06/07 15) und 06 /07/15 405 (442 Police Police Lieutenant Pollce Sergeant) PO-13 PO -11 $BS,764 $78,756) Police Lieutenant position vacant since 07/31/14 und 06/07/15 410 504 Police Police Lieutenant (Police Sergeant) PO -13 PO -11 $890460 ($82,212 Police Lieutenant position vacant since 06/07/15 und VGeneralFund 06/07/15 416 431 Police Police Lieutenant (Police Sergeant) PO -13 (PO -11 $82,212 ($75,516) Police Lieutenant position vacant since 06 /07/15 und 06/07/15 446 (400) Police Police Lieutenant Police Ser ant PO-13 PO.11 $85,764 $78 756) Police S eant osition vacant since 05/26/14 nd 0610711S 390 (376 Police Police Sergeant Police Officer PO-11 PO.7 $78,756 ($69v708) Police Sergeant position vacant since 01/19/15 und 06/07/15 406 40 Police Police Sergeant Police Officer I PO -11 PO- $72,564 $61,764) Police Sergeant position vacant since 05/26/14 General Fund 06/07/15 431 512 Police Police Sergeant (Police Officer Q PO-11 (PO-7) $69,708 ($596460 ) Police Sergeant position vacant since 06/07/15 General Fund 06/07/1S 1849 1S39 Public Works-Buildings Plumbing Inspector Plumber 11 SR -19 WS -10 $56,172 ($53 004 ) Plumbing Inspector position vacant since 11/01/14 General Fund 05101/15 B74 8 Public Works -Roads Equipment Operator 11 (Equipment Operator I BC -9 (BC $48,216 $41604 Equipment Operator II position vacant since 11/01/14 Highway Fund 04/16/15 810 954 Public Works -SW Solid Waste Worksite Supervisor (Solid Waste Working Supervisor) F -110 WS -10 $55t740 $53 OD4 Solid Waste Worksite Supervisor position vacant since 01/01/15 H hway Fund 04/06/15 1840 (1077) Public Works- Wastewtr Wastewtr Plant Op IV ( Wastewtr Plant Operator Assistant ) BC -13 BC -5 $55,824 ($400008) Wastewtr Plant Op IV position vacant since 12/31/24 Sewer Fund OS/28/15 12.602 (2464) 1 Water Senior Account Clerk (Account Clerk) SR -13 (SR -11) $330720 ($31,236) Senior Account Clerk position vacant since 01/01/15 Water Fund 06 /01/15 Information in parentheses represents former department/division, position, salary rating, salary, or funding Page 1 of 1 BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 - JUNE 2015 VACANCIES Page 1 of 4 Po Year FlswlYertFV14- Po Cdc"a CurrentAnnuil TotatDeswaNd FAeeba OepeleeelVDIWIen cwfwftNNTW sawyft a 101111" Cannwft F+Ndin85ow= o WA �� M� 00"vasat sebm;s volts General Fund E -74 Auditor's Office Auditor 114 EXEMPT $42,500 _ - ;r'.,� -` �.r ice•,: v,. (1/201541 General Fund 01/0111113 904 365 4 E -73 Auditor's Office Interim County Auditor* EXEMPT $47,500 �' + 1 X15• GeMral Fund 62,424 General Furl 13 699 365 47,500 2500 Chit Defense Administrative Officer EM -3 05/01115 61 61 $ 15 891 2501 Civil Defense Emergency Mgt Administrative Officer EM -3 102AIIIS 150 150 $ 25,654 2708 Council Services Council Services Administrator EM-5 51 General Fund 110/18/1 1352 365 N/A E-W Councit Services Council Services Review Officer EM -3 $908000 ,� Genanl Fund $35,112 - General Furd $1 General Fund 1 General Fund $ 454 ;; =r "- General Furl ::4� ,. � - 994,454 ';rr' ' •,v - General Fund $67,512 ':i " ' • s„ General Fund General Fund S47.400 State Funds Temporarily f01ed with short-term hire OS 15 56 56 $ 13 808 E -2701 Council Services Council Services Assistant EXEMPT 10/27 14 I 247 247 23,761 E -2714 Council Services Secretarial Assistant EXEMPT 12/31/13 547 36S N/A NEW County Attorney EXEMPT 07/0 14 365 365 N/A E -16 County Attorney EXEMPT 1 12/ 9114 194 194 50,203 E -SO Cou C Attorney EXEMPT 06/2 15 8 8 $ 2 070 135 Elderly Affairs Program Specialist 11 SR -22 1;VS1114 182 182 $ 33,664 241 Elderly Affairs Community Service Program ASSistant SR -13 01/31/15 151 151 $ 15,087 9557 Eldeft Affairs t3mra m Ilst II SR -22 05 /30/15 32 32 $ 4 156 2108 Finance - Administration Risk Management Insurance C4ord ;SR-26 2,140 Accountl Assl General Fud 1 31/14 182 182 $ 40 %7 290 Finance - Accounting Fiscal Specialist 1 $490308 General Fund $61,660] +` General Fund 06/01/15 30 30 $ 4,053 207 Finance- BdgVPrchsg Budget Analyst EM-3 02/16/15 135 135 $ 30,203 1v is 234 Finance Driver License Driver License Clerk II SR -12 $39,492 General fund 05/01/15 61 61 600 ` _ 219 Finance-Realproparly Reel Property Tax Services Supervisor _ SR -24 $68,412 : General Furl $40,548 'l- General Furl 1 14 182 182 $ 34,112 220 Finance -Real Property Real Property Appraiser II SR -18 01/10/15 172 172 $ 19,108 S"1470 w a t r r ry t General Furl 36468 4 . �." °«'s ^ � r , < ,+ f ,r General Fund $294988 - s t ., .F'1*,. General Fund 28,872 ` "•_ - S'� z}�; y+°� f'� General Fwd 105,660 _`jp"n --''`- General Fund $82,056 ,•Jig >u General Ftad �i 1 222 Finance -Real Real Appraiser V SR -24 10/01/13 638 365 44,470 263 Finance -Real Rural Land Use SR•16 15 177 177 $ 17,684 275 Finance -Real Property Senior Clerk SR -10 04 27/15 65 65 $ S,340 242 FlnanceavlVR Sena Berk SR -30 04 16 15 76 76 012 E -84 Fire Deputy Fin Chief EXEMPT 02/16/15 135 135 $ 39 080 626 Fin Fin Prevention L'[Of It SR -23 10/01114 273 273 $ 61,373 720 Fire Fire Fighter III SA-21 $61,160 �'� .; + -" General Fund 03/1 15 107 107 17930 799 Fla Fin ter III SR -21 SR -17 _ 164�fi ., ^� t , ei General Fund $52,308 ;ay �' -, - General Fund 52,308 A General Fund $52,308 t1' r ti .4'{ General Furl $32,460 General Fund $32,460 �f`4. p General Fund $32,460 General Fund 12/ 14 182 182 $ 30,498 _ 630 Fire Fire Fighter l 05/3015 32 32 $ 4,586 632 Fire Fire Fighter I SR -17 12/31/14 182 182 26,082 777 Fire Fire Fighter 1 SR -17 02/19/15 132 132 $ 18,917 1829 Fire -Ocean Safe Lifeguard SR -13 06/22/15 9 9 $ 800 $ 130340 _ LT -2532 Fire- OceenSafety Lifeguard SR -13 02/01/15 150 150 2521 Fire -Ocean Safety Lifeguard SR-13 02/01/15 150 150 $ 13,340 9537 Housing Planner V SR -24 $1 `� .„tr ' -' Federal Furls 1 ,� ` ,S *`�y,. s � a � y� :�`�., K N° f" Federal Funds Si Federal Funds 103/01/14 v'., $7 ie8 -:; r' �vx ' ;� < Federal Furls 12/01/13 S77 365 365 N/A N/A 9539 Housing Housing AsstSpocwnst IN SR -20 07/01/11 2461 9563 Housing Pub His & DvIpmM Prgm Speclatilst 1 SR -20 487 365 N A %64 tors" Pub N & Dv ntSpecialist 111 SR -24 12/31/14 182 182 $ 34 998 -w, $1 .k^Y"J '�%?; ?r. �'fh Federal Funds 9541 Housing Senior Clerk SR -10 07101/13 730 365 N/A $113,268 ., ,s " -t`".p �T ; Genets Fund $1130268 's -'i , ` General FUrd «'�� 800 Human Resources MR Manager 11 EM -3 11/01/14 242 242 $ 75,098 2101 Hunan Resources MR Manager It EM-3 12/31/14 182 182 $ 56,479 05 /01/15 61 61 $ 7,922 2465 Human Resources HR specialist 1 SR -22 $47,400 .ry- :,`'L -` General Fund $1 ;li, General Furl 212 Human Resources F81 ciellst I SR -20 07 /0 u 1095 365 A a $70,188 `'�>r "' } ` �. v ` General Fund $33,77D ' l.; >a z azr,�� �.,.z... ,�`� , . Liquor Fwd E-45 Mayor's Office-B & C Administrative Aide SR -24 10/16/14 2S8 258 $ 49,612 2205 Liquor !;quo Control Inve to Trainee SR•14 04125115 67 67 $ 6,190 127 OED Economic Development Specialist IV SR -24 $734032 General Fund 12/31/14 182 182 $ 36,416 Temporarily filled with short -term him 9210 OED Clerk-Typist I SR -8 $1 ]Program Compliance SpeclaRsu General Fund 04/01/14 456 365 N/A NEW OED Enforcement ist SR -24 SOAM General Fund Part time sltbn Golf Fund 112L31114 07/0 14 365 365 50000 1958 Parks & Rec -Golf Course _ Cosier I SR -10 1$191740 1 182 1 102 1 5 90843 Page 1 of 4 BUDGET ORDINANCE - SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRL 2015 - NNE 2015 VACANCIES Pqe 2 of 4 FbW Vaal Fiscal rw "1A- Ta4al OaTavwrrt (, '>N3+I -TMM W*w �- carr"tposki aTight S��K SWWv Cermrtods FBI Saw= Do 44W/*WS �. VacatK SAM Salary ;SatMngt 1988 Parks & Rec -Golf Course Golf Course Marshal SR -8 $16,B60 Part time position Golf Fund 22/31/14 182 162 $ 8 407 1625 Parks & Rat -Main Beautification & Parks Maint F -205 349,020 _ General Furl si; General Fund " �` N General Fund %57 General Fund 03/02/15 121 121 1 250 1740 Parks &Rec -Main[ Grouralskeeper BC -2 $350 964 06/06115 03/01/13 25 852 25 365 $ 2,463 N/A 1916 Parks & Rec -Main Groundskeeper BC -2 $1 1827 Parks & Rec -Mamt Heavy Truck Driver BC -7 $42,426 12/29/12 914 36S S 42,426 07/01/14 365 365 36,972 1985 Parks & Rec -Malnt Troe Trimmer BC-4 36 972 :r General Fund General fund 1986 Parks At Re Mnn Aerial Truck Operator BC -7 $41,952 07/01/14 365 3fi5 S 41,952 1649 Parks & Rec - Permits Parks Permit Clerk SR -11 $48,024 ;?�;,' General Fund 7. General Fund 12/31/14 182 182 $ 23,946 1653 Parks & Rec - Recreation Swimming Instructor SR -10 $32,460 04/01/15 91 _ 91 S 8,093 3666 Parks &Rec- Raueauon Pool Guard Sp -13 $35,132 General Fund federal Funds 'y- , � - General Fund General Fungi 06/16/15 15 35 $ 1,443 2021 Planning Land Use Permit Technician SR -15 06/(11715 30 30 $ 2,886 2008 planning Planner V SR -24 $600012 05/01 /15 61 61 $ 100029 2004 Plannirm Pbnner VB• SR -28 tAA ,424 1/20150 111/25/13 583 365 44424 Temporarily filled with short-term hire (f VR 2010 Planning Planner VII SR -28 $64,920 Pertnk Enforcement Research SPI General Fund 07/01/L2 1095 365 $ 64,920 TemporaHN filled with short-term hire 2031 Planning Records Management Analyst SR -18 $1 (Enforcement Cs Mgt Sp( General Fund 07/01/12 1095 365 N/A 1317 Pdke Polka SerAcm Officer PO-5 $56,604 Federd Funds b•'i1 +¢ -�F(" -- .r. -. r: Federal Funds 01/23/14 524 365 $ S6,6D4 1318 Polka Polka Services Officer P0.5 $56,604 01/23/14 524 365 5 56,604 1319 Pdke Polka Services Officer Pas $56,604 ' =h Federal Funds 01/23/14 524 365 $ 56,604 ' -�y`< Federal Funds Federal Funds 1320 Polka Police Services Officer PO-5 $56,604r�" 01/23/14 524 365 $ 56,604 1321 Polka Police Services Officer Pas $560604`' 01/23/14 524 365 $ 56,604 ttUy Federal Funds 'Y�Y - General fund 1322 Police Polka Services Officer PO-5 35604 01/23/14 524 365 $ S6,604 361 Police Pdice Services Officer Pas 554,924 06/16/15 15 15 $ 2,257 General Fund 407 Polka Pdke Services Officer PO.S $54,924 06/07/15 24 24 $ 3,611 512 Police Police Services Officer Pas $54,924 06/07/15 24 24 $ 30611 -. .;,�,` General Fund „ Y; �# , :': <;- General Fund 547 Polka Polka Services Officer P0-5 5540924 06/01/15 30 30 $ 4,514 r'• "ry',.' General Fund % . <' t General Fund 543 Police Police Officer I Pal 1,764 04 /13/15 79 79 $ 13,368 312 Police Polka Sergeant Pail $664864 12/31/14 182 182 $ 33,340 400 Police Police Sergeant P0.11 $780756 �' - , ri G General! Fund i'" r u,* fe.1 �' ;� Wltz.; General Fund ILL >.k} <t . 4w GanaralFUd General Fund a' 06/07/15 24 24 $ 5,178 396 Police Police ant PO-11 75,516 06/0715 24 24 $ 4, %5 442 Pollee Police Serpent P0.11 $78,756 06/07/15 24 24 5178 309 Polke IT Technology Project Coordinator SR -24 $55,236 01/16/13 8% 365 $ 55,236 532 Polka Accountant Trainee SR-16 $37,464 a �, { ly ` �. c ;,; General Fund ° yk,,u State Funds 06719/13 02/0 15 742 365 $ 37,464 T -565 Police E Services Di tcher I SR -16 $36,468 150 1SO $ 14 987 $36468 ', , _�b r i? Stem Funds 150 $ 140967 T -56G Police Emergency Swvkn Dispatcher l SR -16 01/15 1SO 1301 Polka School Crossing Guard SR-5 $6,357 General Fund 09 /25/13 644 365 S 6,157 Tempera IN filled with contract Nn (Pollee 1305 Police School Crossing Guard SR -5 $6,157 Computer Systems Tech( General Fund 03/13/09 2301 365 $ 60157 1308 Pdke Scholl Cm Guard SR -5 SG,157 General Fund 113 699 365 $ 6,157 $ 6,157 1307 Pdice School Crossing Guard SR -S $66157 General Fund 04/01/08 2647 365 Tamporsr8y flUed with short-term hire 1309 Polka Schad Crossing Guard SR -5 6157 null Inve ator General Fund 04/01/08 2647 365 $ 61157 _ TemptsnrlN fl0ed with short-term hire 1310 Police School Crossing Guard SR -5 $6,157 (Background Investigator CST General Fund General fund 04/01108 06/11/13 2647 750 365 365 $ 6,157 $ 615_7 1311 Polka School Crossing Guard SR -5 $64157 1314 Police School Crossing Guard SR -5 1S7 Temporarily filled with short-term hire General Fund 07/01/14 365 365 61157 _ I(Background 1315 Police School Craning Guard SR -5 6157 Investigated General Fund 04/01 2647 %5 $ 6 157 Pqe 2 of 4 Wr ORDINANCE -SEC ION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 - JUNE 2015 VACANCIES Page 3 of 4 DepartMM/olahloa GtareutPmklanT,ltle CurreM $eb"ftt4t Current" uial. Salary Centralism FsndPL$ewta EBacUve or" TOW am" V*Cmt Ww 70X+. aa• es.gAsy!sitasss Fbal Yew 4-15) 4s a1 1>e1sV>tNgllst Fbol Yw (fY106- 151- .Evtlnld ad SatarySadnga 1316 Ponce School Crossing Guard SR -5 Temporanly filled with short-term hire $6,157 Ieantgrosad Inve a General Fund 04 1/OB 2667 365 S 6157 2827 Pro Attorney Senior Clerk SR -10 $28,872 v General Fund $40,548 .. ` "' ,,"` -�i. s, ��Q- ' ^��5 =- Federal Furb $49,074 '� t g �-� �r s{" 4, Highway Fund ,r- Highway Pursd $371716 <; c , General Fund $60,012 :=: �•`'�'•� General fund $33,720 General Fund $474268 General Fund $47,268 General Fund $1 $49,068 i� �• �,��. General Fund $1 r '`• General Fund $96.tEl6 General Fund $1 '? General Fund $1 , .t General Fund $480216 „c ; ` - � _ ��' , �' Highway Fund $41,604 '/' -r` via r 5� ,. �� Highway Fund $35,964. +�,r�` r rs Highway Fund $35,966 v .. •,� , .. .: Highway fund $1�` ^} ^%1 -^� "� ,� v -' Highway Fund $42,420 -_ " *• . . r Highway fund $102,966 .z �+) SW/Sewer Fund i:-T -•. rY �.v .... $57,948 Fes,: '" - .,�,$+ _ SW fund $53,004 h. ' SW Fund '9!r 540.791 . r v � .. SW Furl $400788 „u" "'" SW Fund $420664;r�z. SW Fund $47,268 _ "_'`'5 SW Fund ` r�r,'" ` -. .. SW Fund $1 >. � _ ,.r..` 't;E $1 SW Fund $41 *064 ;s"!• ^ � •' �' �'}� SW Fwd $40,S4B -� Y ,.�� „r.' State Funds $40,008 �'i�K ., y 4 � .y' Sewer Fund 548,216 . >i.ale, x Sawer Fund $29,988 . ? , Federal Funds ; =.'� '�K'v,�,�,? .. .ti General Fund Y - '= "� 598,748 . ri. .p�.ys�,yjy Water Fund 547,400 Water Fund -'� 'i4' Water Fund $40.548 i` ^ C� °;'.. , .. ., Water Fund $31,236 - , ;j::., ,,.. $32,460 .. 5 :�. - - "d' Water Fund $79,104 �, �,. �''.` Wetet Fund t�` $75,%0;rz +- -. .,,�o+S,^� Water Fund $42,132 s = k4'' �, 5-u t� X ��' Wain Fund $554500 j jti h, .:7c .lrta" Water Fund $40,548 "�. •'S.s.� ^tis. y;.% Water Fund $51,312 Water Fund $46,176 ,1 Water Fund $41,964 a 47 -' : Water Fund $39,228 Water Fund 15 26 26 S 2 057 T-28251 Prosecuting Attorney Victim Witness Counselor Trainee SR -18 04/11/14 446 365 $ 40,548 1332 Public Works -Auto Auto Mechanic I SC -10 BC -10 12/31/13 547 365 $ 49,074 1342 Public Works -Auto Body 6 Fender Repairer 11/01/09 2068 365 N/A 1543 Public Works- BuUdings Janitor Working Supervisor WS-2 03/01/15 122 122 $ 121606 1527 1439 Public Works- Buildings Public Works - Buildings Code Enforcement Officer Building Permit Clerk SR -26 SR -13 11/01/14 242 242 $ 39,789 03/14/15 109 109 $ 10,070 1533 Pubkk Works - Buildings Maintenance Worker 1 BC-9 01/06 /35 176 376 $ 72,792 1535 Public Works- Buidings Maintenance Worker I BC -9 07/31/14 1 A: 335 $ 43,383 1856 Public Works-Buildings Else- Electronic Equip Repairer Plumber I BC -11 BC -10 N/A 142 Public Works - Buildings 02/11/15 08 /01/13 140 1 699 140 365 $ 18,821 N/A 1427 Public Works -Eft En8 Draf ing Technician I SR -13 1431 Public Works -Eng Land Surveyor III EM-3 06/01/15 30 30 $ 7,948 9052 Public Works -Erq Civil Engineer i SR -18 10/16/11 11/15/08 1354 2419 365 365 N/A N/A T -1977 Public Works -Eft Construction Inspector If SR -19 BB8 &3111 Public Works -Roads Pubic Works -Rwds Equipment Operator 11 Equipment Operator 1 BC -9 BC-6 05 /30/15 32 32 $ 4,227 04 116/15 76 76 $ 84663 843 901 Public Works -Roads Pubic Works -Roads laborer 1 Laborer 1 BC -2 9C -2 01/05 /IS 177 177 $ 17,440 09/01/14 303 303 $ 290855 939 Public Works -Roads Laborer If BC -3 03104/14 484 365 N/A 17M Public Works -Heads Traffic Marker 8C•7 03/01/15 Ofi /IS /SS 122 16 122 16 $ 14,179 S 4,514 1443 1055 Public Works -SW Pubic Works -SW Environmental Services Officer Landfill Worisite Supervisor EM-5 F -112 12/32/14 182 182 $ 28,895 954 Public Works-SW Solid Waste Working Supervisor Msrx WS-10 04 /07/15 85 85 $ 12,343 SW Pubic Works -SW Refuse Cdlsctar 8C-6 06/16/14 3110 365 $ 40,792 %2 Pubic Works -SW Refuse Collector BC-6 10/26/14 248 248 S 27,713 1855 Public Wods•SW Senior Account Clark SR•13 05 16/14 10/01/14 411 273 365 273 $ 42,684 $ 35,354 869 Public Works -SW Refuse Collection Crew Leader 8C•9 1064 Public Works -SW Refuse Collection Crew Leader BC -9 09 /0511 1395 365 N/A 1927 Public Works -SW Sdld Waste Workdts Attendant BC -5 04/01/14 06/01/35 456 3D 365 30 N/A $ 3,375 1947 Public Works-SW DerallW bandored Vehicle Coordinator SR -14 T -1980 Public Works-SW Recycling Specialist l SR -18 05/01115 61 61 $ 60777 10771 Public Works•Wastewtr WastnwV Treatment Pint Op Asst BC -5 05/28115 34 34 $ 3,727 1079 Public Works-Wastewtr Equipment Operator It BC-9 06/04/15 27 27 $ 3,567 9441 Transportation Field Operations Clerk SR -10 03/28/15 95 95 $ 71805 9298 Tratoporutlon Utility Worker BC -5 IS39.22111 11/15/14 225 229 $ 24,504 E -30 2497 Water Water Deputy pu Manager near Procurement & Specification Spec IV ORDINANCE SR -22 12/19/14 194 194 S 52,485 11 /06/13 602 365 S 47,400 2488 Water Accountant I SR•16 02/01/14 515 365 $ 40,548 2464 Water Account Clark SR -21 06/01 /I5 30 30 $ 2,56T 2492 Water Computer System Su Tech I SR•13 06 /01/15 30 30 $ 2,668 2350 2358 24SS Water Water Water Civil Engineer VII Civil Engineer V Civil Engineer ll EM-7 SR -26 SR -20 12/31/05 3469 366 $ 79.104 02/01/14 515 365 S 75,960 06 /25/10 1863 365 42,132 2476 Water Civil Engineer V SR -25 11/16/13 592 365 $ 550500 2455 Water Civil Eftlreer l SR -18 11/16/14 227 227 $ 25,218 2351 Water Waterworks Project Manager SR -24 11/16/12 957 365 $ 51,312 2483 Water Supervising Waterworks Inspector SR-23 03/16112 1202 365 $ 46,176 2484 Water Project Assistant SR -18 03/16114 03/03/15 472' 120 120 'f41,964 41,964 $ 12,897 2405 Water PlpeitterHel r BC -5 Page 3 of 4 BUDGET ORDINANCE -SECTION 19 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 2015 -JUNE 2015 VACANCIES Excludes short -term (on-call, seasonal, 69 -day) BuildMB Revolving Fund and Project Funded positions .... :. .. ... . ..... .,.. 6end j INld mf ° .{ ItoFFRM GN Fwd oomy � SuNd Wtpsla: ... $"w FWAL W.au fisTold Total N of vou" Padumn F Furled) 127 74 14 , 2 6 6.5 1.5 22 Total N of Yaxaft poswels r+dni Funded 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 - jti ��gshw l,Ay�.>,��"'Y�r, � atd M vawtt PoaNian IIII� •. �� t t ��� 19 11 4 0 a 2 2 � i' � t��LL: 4"" is t �}Y ♦ � � �Yd�iRi+�:��L/iS�iLLi A�5iy3+s �j� {K.\n i'Y,Fiy �Yyi�z ^�.�'��YWiiiY-iraaaaaaaa����� 9 Total N d vacant PosNians II� � LLYS'� �{L��� Gta! 151 ® 1g - 2 8 9.5 2.51 22 I� 'aEatMrotd 5glVV SavMNs - AN VtlW* FW*/F*daft FWU64 PosklonS �® (Fetbll VW- 07iUJ/20J4mWAR4,IWJI $ 3,452,063 $ 205,11M wr, S 6,190 S 19,250 $ 123496 $ 19314121$ 945501S 949,122 Excludes short -term (on-call, seasonal, 69 -day) BuildMB Revolving Fund and Project Funded positions .... :. .. ... . ..... .,.. 6end j INld mf ° .{ ItoFFRM GN Fwd oomy � SuNd Wtpsla: ... $"w FWAL W.au fisTold Total N of vou" Padumn F Furled) 127 74 14 1 2 6 6.5 1.5 22 Total N of Yaxaft poswels r+dni Funded 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 atd M vawtt PoaNian (Daft Funded] 19 11 4 0 a 2 2 0 9 Total N d vacant PosNians Gta! 151 6R 1g IL_ 2 8 9.5 2.51 22 'aEatMrotd 5glVV SavMNs - AN VtlW* FW*/F*daft FWU64 PosklonS (Fetbll VW- 07iUJ/20J4mWAR4,IWJI $ 3,452,063 $ 205,11M $ 466,767 S 6,190 S 19,250 $ 123496 $ 19314121$ 945501S 949,122 1eSovings as shown may not be fully redpred due to Jundino of short•term and other positions to meet opemtbnal requimmems Page 4 of 4