HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-3-24SubdivisionCommitteeMeeting (2) webKAUAI PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEETING
March 24, 2015
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission Subdivision Committee of the County of Kauai
was called to order by Committee Vice Chair Sean Mahoney, at 8:36 a.m., at the Lihue Civic
Center, Moikeha Building, in meeting room 2A -213. The following Commissioners were
present:
Mr. Sean Mahoney
Mr. Louis Abrams
The following staff members were present: Planning Department — Kenneth Estes, Duke
Nakamatsu; Deputy County Attorney Ian Jung
CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chair Mahoney called the meeting to order at 8:36 a.m.
ROLL CALL
Staff Planner Kenneth Estes noted two committee members were present constituting a
quorum.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
On the motion by Louis Abrams and seconded by Sean Mahoney to approve the
agenda, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
MINUTES of the meeting(s) of the Subdivision Committee (None)
RECEIPT OF ITEMS FOR THE RECORD (None)
HEARINGS AND PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public testimony.
GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS (None)
V:A2015 Master Files\ Commissions \Subdivisions \2015 -3 -24 Subdivision Committee Minutes
UNFINISHED BUSINESS (None)
NEW BUSINESS (For Action)
Tentative Subdivision Action:
Subdivision
Application
No.
S- 2015 -09,
George
Tsukamoto,
et. al. Proposed 2 -lot
Subdivision, TMK:
(4)
4 -6- 010:004
por., 005 por.,
035,
036, Kapaa
Homesteads, Kauai,
Mr. Estes stated that the primary intent is to consolidate a portion of a pipeline right of
way and a ditch right of way from the State of Hawaii with the applicant's abutting property. It
is unclear whether parcel 35, proposed lot 187a, and parcel 36, proposed lot 187b are two lots of
record. Prior to tentative subdivision action, the applicant shall provide documentation that
addresses this issue. Once resolved the Department recommends approval with agency
requirements.
Dennis Esaki representing the applicant stated that they are two parcels separated by two
more parcels; one a ditch right of way and one a pipe right of way. The applicant has an
easement over the right of ways from the State and is in the process of purchasing the right of
ways. Parcels 35 and 36 are under separate ownership. They are requesting tentative approval
subject to providing proof of ownerships as opposed to waiting.
Attorney Jung noted that it is a ditch stream and railroad right of way issue where it is an
open question as to whether or not it is an easement or a fee lot. The County was at odds with
the State's interpretation. It primarily affected the agricultural district and not necessarily the
residential district. In this case they have the ability to subdivide and create two new lots of
record. The State will provide a quitclaim deed asserting interest in the property without
identifying whether or not it is a fee lot. They can come in and do the consolidation without
having to say what ownership status that ditch or stream lot /easement may be. The State will
consolidate it and put a condition that they still have to go through the County subdivision
process. The subdivision makes sure that the two new created lots are up to County standard.
Mr. Estes stated that upon tentative approval the Department will work with the applicant
in resolving the issue.
Vice Chair Mahoney questioned if that satisfies the Department's concern to which
Attorney Jung replied it's more of a concern when dealing with the ag district because of the
one -time subdivision restriction where you can't further subdivide. In the residential districts if
there is space to create the subdivision it's not that big of an issue as long as it meets the
standards.
On the motion by Louis Abrams and seconded by Sean Mahoney to approve, the
motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
2
V:A2015 Master Files\ Commissions \Subdivisions \2015 -3 -24 Subdivision Committee Minutes
Subdivision Application No. S- 2015 -10, Kenneth C. Medeiros & Timothy M. Medeiros,
Proposed 2 -lot Subdivision, TMK: (4) 2 -7- 005:015, Omao, Koloa, Kauai
Mr. Estes stated that the proposed development establishes two lots within the residential
district. He noted that the applicant was unable to attend the meeting.
Vice Chair Mahoney asked if there were any concerns to which Mr. Estes replied there
PAWOW44
Attorney Jung questioned if the applicant was okay with the tentative condition to which
Mr. Estes replied he forwarded the report to the applicant and he had no objections.
On the motion by Mr. Abrams and seconded by Sean Mahoney to approve, the
motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Final Subdivision Action
Subdivision
Application
No.
S- 2011 -21, Kukuiula Development Co. (Hawaii) LLC., Proposed
33 -lot
Subdivision, TMK: (4)
2 -6- 019:022,
023, 024, Koloa, Kona, Kauai
Mr. Abrams asked for an update on the provisions of the tentative approval. He
questioned the progress on the 20 acre park to which Lindsay Crawford, representing the
applicant, replied that the community park is a process they have been working on for a long
time. The planning process needs to go through a bit more and they are probably looking at
2017 before they are in a mode to construct it. There is an affordable housing project across
Poipu Road that might lend some impetus to bring the two projects along together.
Mr. Abrams questioned the dedication of easements over all of the project's bicycle and
pedestrian ways to the County to which Mr. Lindsay stated that he can provide a progress exhibit
that shows some of the trails that have been built but not yet dedicated. They come piecemeal
with each of the subdivisions. This particular subdivision doesn't have a place where there is a
public trail going through it.
Mr. Abrams questioned how they plan to dedicate the trails and whether it will be done at
the very end to which Mr. Lindsay replied they have not yet dedicated any easements to the
County. Many are private roadways that will have the entire roadway dedicated as a public
easement. It is a process they need to get into with the County to formally dedicate.
Attorney Jung noted that the process would be to go to Council for approval because of
the indemnification provisions.
V:A2015 Master Files\ Commissions \Subdivisions \2015 -3 -24 Subdivision Committee Minutes
Mr. Abrams noted that the provision states prior to final subdivision map approval the
applicant shall meet with the Planning Department to resolve the applicable requirements of the
sections of the Ordinance.
Attorney Jung asked whether there were any trails on this subdivision to which Mr.
Crawford noted there were none.
Mr. Jung noted that on the new ones that come through, under the new Administrative
Rules, any public pedestrian access will have to go through the Open Space Commission for
identification on where the easement should go. In a subdivision context they have to configure
lots to maximize the density.
Mr. Abrams questioned if this provision will be on every subdivision and if it will be
woven into subdivisions that are already built to which Mr. Crawford replied that there is an
exhibit showing the concept of how the trails would work. Some have changed noticeably. To
actually create them and dedicate them on the map has not worked so they executed a path and
trails declaration with the County that outlines a different process where they come in not as a
prerequisite but during the mapping process and shortly thereafter create the easements. The
formal dedication is yet to go.
Attorney Jung noted that it is a relatively new concept in terms of mauka access. For
makai access it is a little more involved where there is an SMA application before the
Commission.
Mr. Abrams questioned the dedication of a 20 foot wide lateral public beach access along
the Kukuiula Bay shoreline to which Mr. Crawford replied that it is in the same 2017 timeframe
as the community park. They need to meet with the public and discuss what needs to be
developed.
Mr. Abrams questioned the shoreline recreation resources and if the easement was ever
acquired to which Mr. Crawford replied that the County couldn't perfect trying to acquire the
easement they were looking at so they paid the County an in lieu fee.
Attorney Jung pointed out that the access through the former Hoban property that was
before the Open Space Commission never materialized so the monies based on the EIA fees
lapsed and went to Poipu Beach Park improvements.
Mr. Abrams noted that condition IF states that prior to final subdivision approval the
applicant shall disclose whether the lots will be further developed and if so the layout may be
revised. He questioned if this is the revision to which Mr. Crawford replied this is the final
subdivision map.
Mr. Abrams stated that he was not quite sure why the condition was there relating to
unique shaped lots to which Mr. Crawford replied there were some long slender lots in this
subdivision. They worked with the Department to adjust the lots to make sure they meet the lot
width ratios.
M
VA2015 Master Files\ Commissions \Subdivisions \2015 -3 -24 Subdivision Committee Minutes
Mr. Abrams questioned drainage revisions. He noted that is a continual source of
discussion and sometimes the drainage backs up along Lawai Road. Mr. Crawford noted this
subdivision is not the Lawai Channel. This goes through the center of golf course area and the
drainage there is working fine.
Mr. Abrams noted that 2E says that all interior roadways shall remain private. He
questioned where they would get into what is interior and what is not to which Mr. Crawford
replied this subdivision only crates one or two small residential roadways, the same as Kukuiula.
Attorney Jung noted they worked on the 20 acre park agreement and questioned the status
to which Mr. Crawford stated he thinks it has been reviewed by the Parks Department but he is
not sure if it was actually executed.
Attorney Jung stated that they will follow up on it.
Mr. Abrams stated that with the two main parks there was dedication of some and there
was a maintenance issue. He would curious to follow up.
On the motion by Louis Abrams and seconded by Sean Mahoney to approve, the
motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
ADJOURNMENT
Vice Chair Mahoney adjourned the Committee meeting at 9:03 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
r '
Duke Nakamatsu,
Commission Support Clerk
5
VA2015 Master Files\ Commissions \Subdivisions \2015 -3 -24 Subdivision Committee Minutes