HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016_0318_AgendaPacketRyan de la Pena
Chair
Mary Tudela
Vice -Chair
Secretary
COUNTY OF KAUA'I BOARD OF ETHICS
NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA
Friday, March 18, 2016
1:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter
Mo`ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room 3
4444 Rice Street, Lihu'e, HI 96766
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Open Session Minutes of February 19, 2016
REOUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION
Members:
Calvin Murashige
Brad Nagano
Warren Perry
Maureen Tabura
RAO 16 -002 Request from Sally Motta, Deputy Director of Finance, requesting an
opinion as to whether there is a conflict to provide a testimonial on behalf
of Atlas Insurance Brokers, the contracted insurance broker for the County
of Kauai
BUSINESS
BOE 2016 -01 Election of Secretary for remainder of calendar year 2016
DISCLOSURES
1.
Deatri Alexis Nakea (Historic Preservation Commission)
2.
Glenda Nogami - Streufert (Planning Commission)
3.
Michael Carlton Curtis (Board of Ethics)
4.
Fely L. Faulkner (Civil Service Commission)
5.
Tyler Rand Radighiero (Cost Control Commission)
6.
Lisa Ruth Arin (Candidate for Prosecuting Attorney)
7.
Laurie LK Yoshida (Cost Control Commission)
8.
Ted K. Blake (Open Space Public Access Commission)
9.
Althea K. Arinaga (Historic Preservation Commission)
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes § §92 -4 and 92 -9 (a)(14) (b), the purpose of this executive
session is to receive and approve Executive Session minutes and to consult with the
Commission's legal counsel on issues pertaining to the Commission's and the County's powers,
duties, privileges, immunities, and or liabilities as they may relate to this item, deliberate and
take such action as appropriate.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
ES -003: Regular Executive Session Minutes of February 19, 2016
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
Ratify Board of Ethics actions taken in Executive Session for items: ES -003
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Next Meeting: Friday, April 15, 2016 - 1:00 p.m., Mo`ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes §92 -7 (a), the Commission may, when deemed necessary,
hold an executive session on any agenda item without written public notice if the executive
session was not anticipated in advance. Any such executive session shall be held pursuant to
HRS §92 -4 and shall be limited to those items described in HRS §92 -5(a).
c: Nicholas Courson, Deputy County Attorney
PUBLIC COMMENTS and TESTIMONY
Persons wishing to offer comments are encouraged to submit written testimony at least 24 -hours
prior to the meeting indicating:
1. Your name and if applicable, your position/title and organization you are representing;
2. The agenda item that you are providing comments on; and
3. Whether you will be testifying in person or submitting written comments only.
4. If you are unable to submit your testimony at least 24 hours prior to the meeting, please
provide 10 copies of your written testimony at the meeting clearly indicating the name of
the testifier; and
While every effort will be made to copy, organize and collate all testimony received, materials
received on the day of the meeting or improperly identified may be distributed to the members
after the meeting is concluded.
The length of time allocated to persons wishing to present verbal testimony may be limited at the
discretion of the chairperson or presiding member.
Send written testimony to:
Board of Ethics
Attn: Barbara Davis
Office of Boards & Commissions
2 1 P a g c
Board of Ethics - March 18, 2016
4444 Rice Street, Suite 150
Lihu`e,11I 96766
Email: bdavis @kauai.gov
Fax: 241 -5127 Phone: 241 -4919
SPECIAL ASSISTANCE
If you need an alternate format or an auxiliary aid to participate, please contact the Boards &
Commissions Support Clerk at 241 -4919 at least five (5) working days prior to the meeting.
3 1 P a g e
Board of Ethics — March 18, 2016
COUNTY OF KAUAI .4 Nil Toft
US
Minutes of Meeting
OPEN SESSION
Board/ Committee:
BOARD OF ETHICS
Meeting Date I
February 19, 2016
Location
Mo`ikeha Building, Liquor Conference Room 3
Start of Meeting: 1:00 p.m.
I End of Meeting: 1:58 p.m.
Present
Chair Ryan de la Pena; Vice Chair Mary Tudela; Secretary Addison Bulosan. Members: Calvin Murashige; Brad Nagano; Warren
Perry; Maureen Tabura
Staff. Deputy County Attorney Nicholas Courson; Boards & Commissions Office: Support Clerk Barbara Davis; Administrator Jay
Furfaro
Excused
Absent
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Call To Order
Chair de la Pena called the meeting to order at
1:00 p.m. with 7 members present.
Approval of
Regular Open Session Minutes of December 18, 2015
Ms. Tabura moved to approve the minutes as
Minutes
circulated. Mr. Nagano seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:1 (abstain - Tudela)
Communication
BOE 2015 -22 Proposed Charter amendment from the Board of Ethics on
11 /13i 15 to the Charter Review Commission regarding Article XX for the
Kauai County Charter
�O
a. Section 20.02 E was received for the record by the Charter
Commission and will not be moving to the ballot
s
Staff explained the Charter Commission felt this proposed amendment was
not clear enough and it did not explain "undue detriment'. The
Commission was initially going to ask the Chair or the Attorney to come
forward at their upcoming meeting to clarify the terminology, but
subsequently felt with so many proposals possibly going before the voters
�-
they would not move this forward.
V1
Attorney Courson said to clarify, when he looked at various other Codes of
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016 Page 2
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Ethics there is the idea of detriment, but it is so difficult to explain that he
did not see it done anywhere by the Charter. It was done by a code where
they could really explain what was meant. The reason he picked "undue" as
a qualifier was if anything was ever done bad to anyone, whether it was due
or not, we would be in violation of the Code of Ethics so he could not just
say detriment. In trying to clarify this it was becoming so long it would not
belong in something like the Charter. If the Board wants to explore the
concept of prohibiting detriments it would be better done through Ordinance
and asking the Council to adopt it. Mr. Perry asked if that would be in
conformity with the Charter. Attorney Courson said the Charter allows the
Council to supplement via Ordinance, so they could as long as it is not in
contradiction to anything. Mr. Perry asked if the statement the Council can
enact Ordinances was not under the section on Disclosures. Attorney
Courson said that was a very good point, but to the extent it is read that way
that is strict constructionist viewpoint, but so too are the "Penalties" under
the Disclosure section with the concept the Mayor, the Council and the
Board of Ethics being responsible for enforcement of provisions. Attorney
Courson suggested to clean that particular portion up might be a worthy
goal the next time they can get something on the Charter noting he did not
think it was the intention to bury all that stuff under Disclosures.
Mr. Perry moved to receive BOE 2015 -22. Mr.
Murashige seconded the motion. Motion carried
7:0
Disclosures
a. Louis Edmund Abrams (Planning Commission)
b. Mary Kathleen Hertog (Police Commission)
C. Sherman Shiraishi (Board of Water)
d. Kevin Thomas Mince (Police Commission)
e. Karen S. Matsumoto (Civil Service Commission)
f. Ted K. Blake (Open Space, Public Access)
g. Dorothy Roberts Bekeart (Board of Review)
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016
SUBJECT
Page 3
DISCUSSION
h. Althea K. Arinaga (Kaua`i Historic Preservation Review
Commission)
i. Shoshana Rachel O'Brien (Deputy County Attorney)
j. Anne Karen Schneider (Kaua`i Historic Preservation Review
Commission)
k. Kipukai L.P. Kuali`i (Candidate for County Council)
Chair de la Pena noted there were two disclosures requiring clarification for
either missing income or potentially incomplete income (h. and f.)
Mr. Perry suggested at some future point adding the requirement on the
Disclosure form to specify the State for which the TMK is listed as the
street address may not be indicative of which State the property is located
in.
Request for an RAO 16 -001 Request from Angela Anderson, former Planning
Advisory Opinion Commissioner, as to whether there is a conflict for HILT (Hawaiian Islands
Land Trust) in which she is the Kauai Island Director to enter into a
contract with the County of Kauai to assist with facilitating acquisitions for
the Open Space Program
Ms. Angela Anderson was present to give background information to the
Board and answer any questions they might have. Ms. Anderson explained
she was representing herself in terms of her former position and to make
sure everything was clear. Ms. Anderson serves as the Kauai Island
Director for HILT (Hawaiian Islands Land Trust) in which there is an
Executive Director and they are a non -profit so the ultimate decisions are
made at the Board level. Ms. Anderson said her correspondence was out of
an abundance of caution and to make sure there is full disclosure. Ms.
Anderson's previous position was on the Planning Commission for the
ACTION
Mr. Perry moved to receive disclosures a.
through e., g., and i. through k. and deem them
complete. Ms. Tudela seconded the motion.
Motion carried 7:0
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016 Page 4
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
two years and she stepped down at the first Planning Commission hearing in
January (2016). The Hawaiian Islands Land Trust is an organization she has
worked with in varying capacities as a volunteer, served on their Island
Council, and did pro bono work for them. They are a non - profit that does
land acquisitions for conservation. HILT was approached by the County
about the possibility of serving in a role of assisting them in facilitating
open space acquisitions. Because of her former role she wanted to make
sure as they proceed in going forward with that potential contract that all the
requirements are met. Her assumption was that the County would make
sure that whatever their end process was, was correct, but she requested the
Advisory Opinion to make sure they move forward in a transparent way.
Ms. Tabura said with Ms. Anderson having been on the Planning
Commission do they not have any interaction with the Open Space
Commission. Ms. Anderson said she is clear in terms of the direct
relationship. The Planning Commission can make recommendations. Prior
to serving in her role at HILT there was a question regarding a public access
and because the recommendation from the County Attorney was that was
not a condition they could put for that particular permit but if the County
wanted to explore doing some sort of easement we could refer it over to the
Commission. In terms of Ms. Anderson's experience that was the only
direct involvement where (the Planning Commission) referred things to the
Open Space Commission, and that occurred at a different time than when
she served in the capacity of Kauai Director. She was aware there could be
potential conflicts in terms of her role as Chair this last year and in a
situation where HILT owned a conservation easement she would recuse
herself from those situations. That was very clear to her.
Mr. Perry stated that Ms. Anderson cited a couple of Articles of the Charter
and the Code of Ordinances in her letter and she is not a present employee
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016 Page 5
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
or officer or board member. It seems like the question is the subject matter
of the contract. It may involve § §20.03 B and 3 -1.8. Subject matter of the
contract is from the Code and in the matter with which the contract is
directly concerned and he asked Ms. Anderson to elaborate on that — what is
the subject matter of the contract.
Ms. Anderson said she would have to give a caveat because her background
is in law and she is a practicing attorney however, for her role with HILT
she is not an attorney and is not representing them in a legal capacity. In
terms of exactly what that entails that is where any gray area we are here to
make sure that this particular contract, which would move forward, would
not fall under that and she did not believe it did. The subject matter of the
contract — and again the contract has not been finalized and is on hold prior
to getting the Advisory from the Board — is about facilitating the acquisition
of specific parcels so that is determined by the Open Space Commission.
The Open Space will hear testimony or take public input and provide a list
of areas that are priorities for acquisition. The role that HILT would play
would be to assist the County in negotiating those transactions. The reason
why HILT is in a good position to do that is because this is the work that
HILT does. The purpose of our organization is to be able to either purchase
properties in fee or have conservation easements on property. We hold
those conservation easements and ensure the conservation values that have
been set aside as being important for those areas that we monitor those and
make sure that development is not happening on those parcels. We have a
model where we primarily do conservation easements and that is something
that is fairly new to municipalities, which is why we would assist that. A lot
of times rather than do a fee simple property acquisition it can be a
conservation easement. We can help in terms of what would be appropriate
or give input into going forward if there are a limited amount of funds and
how to best leverage for the biggest bang for the conservation here on
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016
Page 6
SUBJECT I DISCUSSION ACTION
Kauai.
Mr. Perry asked what the present role was of the Planning Commission and
the Open Space program. Ms. Anderson said she was unsure what that role
is for the Planning Commission. There has not been, in her experience, any
oversight she is aware of from the Commission and she has never appeared
before Open Space. From her part because she took this position with
Hawaiian Islands Land Trust she was aware she could not go before the
Open Space Commission so purposely did not get involved in any matters,
not that any matters came before her but she chose not to get involved in
those matters for that reason.
Chair de la Pena called for a motion.
Attorney Courson asked the Board to articulate the logic for the basis of
their decision. Mr. Nagano said Ms. Anderson no longer represents the
County of Kauai and he does not see any conflict with her being involved
in the County and HILT. Ms. Tabura said there is a one year provision and
they cannot participate for one year. Chair de la Pena said Ms. Anderson
recused herself from the subject matters that would be under that one year
provision. Mr. Perry said she is no longer an employee and the subject
matter of the contract is not directly involved. Ms. Tabura said she is not an
employee or Planning Commission officer anymore but with the proposed
contract or the relationship with the County does it look like she would
benefit? Attorney Courson did not think the prohibition was as simple as if
you worked or served for the County you can't do anything with the County
for one year. It really does matter (inaudible) what the subject matter is
versus what her role was and if there is no overlap in the (inaudible) within
the year that should not matter.
Executive Session
Mr. Nagano moved that the Board find there is
no conflict. Ms. Tudela seconded the motion.
Motion carried 7:0
Attorney Courson cited that the Board would
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016 Page 7
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
into Executive Session pursuant to the Hawaii
Revised Statutes for ES -001 and ES -002: BOE
16 -001 as fully described on the posted agenda.
Mr. Perry moved to go into Executive Session at
1:40 p.m. Ms. Tudela seconded the motion.
Motion carried 7:0
Return to Open
Ratify Board of Ethics actions taken in Executive Session for items: ES-
The meeting resumed in Open Session at 1:55 p.m.
Session
001 and ES -002
Mr. Perry moved to ratify the Board's actions
taken during Executive Session. Mr. Nagano
seconded the motion. Motion carried 7:0
Announcements
Next Meeting: Friday, March 18, 2016 — 1:00 p.m.
Mr. Bulosan announced his resignation as of March 15, 2016, from the
Board of Ethics. Looking at the timeline and the nature of 2016 and holding
his position at the Pacific Chiropractic Center and being consistently
solicited to be part of things that might be in conflict with the Board of
Ethics he is taking the safe route and removing himself from the Board so
he does not find himself in sticky situations. Mr. Bulosan stated he has
enjoyed being on the Board and wished he could stay.
Mr. Furfaro stated that Mr. Mike Curtis has been identified as a candidate to
replace Mr. Perry and will be going before Council in the next week.
Adjournment
Chair de la Pena adjourned the meeting at1:58
p.m.
Board of Ethics
Open Session
February 19, 2016
Submitted by:
Page 8
Barbara Davis, Staff Support Clerk
Reviewed and Approved by:
Ryan de la Pena, Chair
( ) Approved as circulated. ( ) Approved with amendments. See minutes of meeting.
Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr.
Mayor
Nadine K. Nakamura
Managing Director
March 9, 2016
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
County of Kauai, State of Hawai'i
4444 Rice Street, Suite 280, Lihu'e, Hawai'i 96766
County of Kauai Board of Ethics
C/O Boards and Commissions
4444 Rice Street, Suite 150
Lihue, HI 96766
Re: Request for review of Draft Testimonial
Dear Ryan De La Pena. Chairman
Ken M. Shimonishi
Director of Finance
Sally A. Motta
Deputy Director of Finance
i I i ; 1'N'lffl
9 2016
i - .�I
I have attached a copy of a draft testimonial I have been requested to sign on behalf of Atlas
Insurance Brokers, who is the contracted Insurance broker for the County of Kauai.
The information in this testimonial is accurate and possibly would be incorporated into an RFP
(Request for Proposal) Atlas Insurance may be submitting to another government body and since
this testimonial would be executed on behalf of the County of Kauai, I am requesting a review to
determine if Section 20.02 is applicable.
Mah lo,
Sally A. Motta
Deputy Director of Finance
Cc: Ken Shimonishi, Director of Finance
Nadine K. Nakamura, Managing Director
Mauna Kean Trask, County Attorney
gH6 l6- ooh.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Testimonial excerpts from
Sally Motta
Kauai County
Deputy Director of Finance
808.241.4281
smotta@kauai.aov
Atlas Insurance saved our lives. The staff and account team are simply phenomenal
When our risk management employee retired — taking much of the institutional
knowledge with him — our Atlas broker, Bill Sandkuhler, walked us through
everything we had, step -by -step, patiently answering all our questions in a way that,
as lay- people, we understood it and could make decisions.
Atlas helped us sort our insurance certificates with the State, and went above -and-
beyond to make sure all our filings were current and in order
It was a potentially frightening time for us, realizing how much we didn't know and
how much we had to learn. The folks at Atlas were our first phone call, and fifteen
minutes into the call, we were breathing again. They were immediately available —
calm and professional and with all the information right at their fingertips. I can't
say enough good things about them.
Being on a neighbor island, it's sometimes more difficult to get face -to -face time
with Oahu -based vendors. Not with Atlas. They routinely fly over to do training with
our staff and are available whenever we need them. And their customer service is
simply incredible — always available, always able to answer our questions, always
able to follow up on things that need further attention.
Some vendors insist on working with one point -of- contact in the office, which might
make it easier for them to streamline communication, but it's not always the most
efficient way for us to do business. The Atlas team has no problem working directly
with our various department heads, answering their questions as they arise and
explaining issues that need clarification. I always feel like I'm asking too much of
Bill, but he always responds with the same answer: "Not at all. That's what I'm here
for."
As elected and appointed officials, we rely on the civil service employees to keep the
office steady between elections and appointments. Now, with Atlas as part of our
team — even extending their contract one year past the election cycle to ensure
continuity — we feel comfortable that those who follow us will find it seamless and
easy to pick up where we left off.