HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-0423-CRC Open Sess Draft.doct� t3 "'M;1-_J1mi J
COUNTY OF KAUA I ��` v .. v
Minutes of Meeting
OPEN SESSION
Board/Commission:
I CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION
Meeting Date
I April 23, 2018
Location
Mo'ikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A/2B
Start of Meeting: 3:00 p.m.
I End of Meeting: 4:15 p.m.
Present
Chair Carol Suzawa; Vice Chair Jan TenBruggencate; Members: Ricky Watanabe, Marissa Sandblom, and Patrick Stack
Also: Deputy County Attorney Adam Roversi; Boards & Commissions Office Staff. Administrative Specialist Lani Agoot and
Administrator Nicholas R. Courson
Excused
Virginia Kapali and Galen Nakamura
Absent
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Prior to the start of the meeting Administrative Assistant to the County Clerk Eddie Topenio gave
the Oath of Office to new Commissioner Patrick Stack.
Call To Order
Chair Suzawa called the
meeting to order at 3:00
p.m. with five
commissioners present.
Approval of
Minutes
Open Session Minutes of March 19, 2018
Mr. TenBruggencate
moved to approve the
Open Session minutes of
March 19, 2018, as
circulated. Mr. Stack
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 5:0.
Executive Session
ES-007 Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes Sections 92-4 and 92-5(a)(4), the purpose of this
Mr. TenBruggencate
moved to go into
Executive Session at
3:01 p.m. Mr.
Watanabe seconded the
motion. Motion carried
5:0.
executive session is to consult with the County's legal counsel on questions, issues, status, and
procedural matters. This consultation involves consideration of the powers, duties, privileges,
immunities, and/or liabilities of the Commission and the Copp as they relate to CRC 2017-08, a
,
proposed Charter Amendment to Amend Article XIX, Financial Procedures, Section 19.15(C),
relating to Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Fund, expanding the
permissible uses of the fund to include the improvement and maintenance of acquired lands or
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 23, 2018
Page 2
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
property entitlements, and existing public beach accesses. (deferred 11127/17, 12118117, 1122118,
2126118, 3119118)
ES-008 Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes §92-4, §92-5(a () 4),§92-9(a) (1-4), the purpose of this
executive session is for the Commission to approve the Executive Session meeting minutes of
March 19, 2018, and to consult with its attorney on issues pertaining to the Commission's powers,
duties, privileges, immunities, and/or liabilities as they may relate to this agenda item
Return to Open
Ratify Commission actions taken in Executive Session for items: ES-007 and ES-008.
The meeting resumed in
Session
Open Session at 3:19
p.m.
Mr. TenBruggencate
moved to ratify the
actions taken in
Executive Session for
ES-007 and ES-008. Ms.
Sandblom seconded the
motion. Motion carried
5:0.
Business
CRC 2017-08 Proposed Charter Amendment to Amend Article XIX, Financial Procedures, Section
19.15(C), relating to the Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Fund,
expanding the permissible uses of the fund to include improvement and maintenance of acquired
lands or property entitlements, and existing public beach accesses. (deferred 11127/17, 12118117,
1122118, 2126118, 3119118)
Deputy Planning Director Ka`aina Hull stated that the Open Space Commission met on Thursday
and upon reviewing the proposed Charter amendment that was approved by the Charter Review
Commission, they had some concerns regarding the phrases "and maintenance" and "or
maintenance." Their concern was that the Open Space Fund could potentially be used solely for
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 23, 2018
Page 3
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
maintenance purposes and not land acquisition. He said there is a recognized need for initial
improvements to some of the Open Space Commission's projects and potential accesses that already
exist only on maps. Mr. Hull stated that the Open Space Commission has made it their task to —
should the proposal be adopted — attempt to secure some form of community organization or
commitment from a State agency to maintain the site once the initial improvement was complete.
He said the Open Space Commission's recommendation is to remove "and maintenance" from C.1
and "or maintenance" from C.3.
Chair Suzawa asked if there is a projection with regard to the portion of the fund that would be used
for improvements to which Mr. Hull said the funds that would be used for improvements to existing
coastal accesses would be to identify, survey, and demarcate accesses. He said one problem with
existing coastal accesses is that oftentimes homeowners in the area will remove the demarcation;
however, he didn't think a large portion of the fund would be needed to improve and/or demarcate
coastal accesses. Mr. Hull added with regard to improvements to other property acquisitions, it
would be up to the Open Space Commission and ultimately up to Council to approve or deny any
proposed improvements. Chair Suzawa stated that she would be more comfortable if the amount to
be used for improvements was limited to make sure there would be sufficient funds for acquisition.
Mr. Hull stated that he wasn't in a position to object or support putting a cap on the funds for
improvements and would have to take Chair Suzawa's concern back to the Open Space Commission
for further discussion. He said whether or not the funds are capped, the intention is that if the
community feels a particular improvement is appropriate and Council agrees, it would be incumbent
upon Council to either approve or deny the proposal.
Ms. Sandblom asked Mr. Hull if it was the Open Space Commission's intention to define
improvement on a case -to -case basis to which Mr. Hull clarified that should the proposed
amendment be adopted, a recommended ordinance amendment would be required and further details
would need to be flushed out regarding what would constitute an improvement.
Chair Suzawa asked if it was difficult to create a percentage for improvements because she felt it
would give the community a better sense that the fund would be available for the purpose it was
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 23, 2018
Paged
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
created for. Mr. Hull stated that right now the Open Space Fund has 6.5 million dollars. If 25%, for
example, of the fund was used for improvements, it would leave a significant amount for land
acquisition. However, currently Council has a draft bill on their agenda to expend 5.6 million
dollars for a parcel at Black Pot Beach Park, which would fairly deplete the fund, leaving very little
for improvements based on a 25% cap. He added that he couldn't speak to a specific percentage
amount for a cap, but if the Charter Review Commission wanted to propose a specific percentage, he
would take the proposal to the Open Space Commission for their input.
Ms. Sandblom stated that when the proposed Charter amendment first came before the Charter
Review Commission, a 25% cap was discussed. She said part of the discussion was that checks and
balances exist to ensure that the fund wouldn't be abused. Mr. Hull said the checks and balances are
that any appropriation of funds for improvements would have to be agendized, go through a
budgetary process, a public hearing, a committee referral at Council, action at the committee, and
then sent to full Council for decision -making. He said the Open Space Commission understands that
the proposed amendment is the process they need to move forward with acquisitions because there
have been hurdles in the past where an acquisition may have been possible but there was no ability
to improve the site; therefore, it would be an acquisition in which the site would remain derelict.
Mr. TenBruggencate asked for further clarification regarding the proposed acquisition of the Black
Pot Beach parcel to which Mr. Hull explained that the acquisition was initiated at Council in
Executive Session while dealing with the condemnation proceedings of another parcel in that area,
which is why, during the negotiations, it couldn't be referred to the Open Space Commission
because it was confidential. Once a settlement was reached, the proposed acquisition went on
Council's agenda and the Open Space Commission found out about it. He said the Open Space
Commission Chair voiced his opposition to the proposal taking place without the Open Space
Commission's review. Council then forwarded their proposed draft bill to the Open Space
Commission for review, and the Commission made a recommendation that the proposal for the
acquisition is in -line with four of the Open Space Fund's objectives and recommended approval of
the acquisition. Mr. Hull added that the recommendation includes that any acquisition should not
exceed the assessed valued of the property, and anything beyond the assessed value should come
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 23, 2018
Page 5
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
from another funding source.
Mr. TenBruggencate
moved to amend CRC
2017-08 by removing
"for maintenance" in C.1
and "or maintenance" in
C.3. Mr. Watanabe
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 5:0.
CRC 2017-13 Proposed Charter Amendment allowing the Salary Commission complete authority
establish the salaries of all elected and appointed officials. (deferred 1122118, 2126118, 3/19/1 &
Mr. TenBruggencate stated that he recalled from the last meeting that Human Resources Director
Janine Rapozo was satisfied with the decision that the Commission not add language into the
Charter referring to County agencies that are not in the Charter and allow the Salary Commission the
latitude to add those positions as they see fit.
Mr. TenBruggencate
moved to approve CRC
2017-13. Mr. Watanabe
seconded the motion.
Mr. Courson provided that 23.01(D) doesn't have a list of Chartered department heads and read the
following: "(1) The term officer shall include the following: mayor, prosecuting attorney, and
members of the council; (2) Any person excluded from Chapter 76, HRS and the position
classification plan who is appointed as administrative head of any department or agency of the
county or as a member of any board or commission; (3) Deputies appointed by the administrative
head of any department or agency of the county who are excluded from Chapter 76, HRS and the
position classification plan. "
Mr. TenBruggencate stated that based on the language provided by Mr. Courson and the legal
opinion that was given to the Salary Commission, the agencies not included in the Salary
Commission's list should be included.
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 23, 2018
Page 6
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Mr. Courson said that interpretations differ with regard to who is excluded from Chapter 76, civil
service law, and what exclusion means. He said he has never seen a legal opinion or the logic, but if
those positions — specifically the Executives on Aging and Transportation — could accurately be
described as excluded from collective bargaining and administrative heads, they would fall under the
definition of officers as defined.
Ms. Sandblom stated a key point is that the amendment also includes the addition of the Director of
Human Resources and the Director of Finance to ensure the Salary Commission doesn't set
inappropriate salaries.
Mr. Stack voiced his concern that the amendment would allow the Salary Commission "complete"
authority, saying that complete authority is not something that works in a democratic society.
Mr. TenBruggencate provided clarification regarding the proposed language, saying that for many
years the Salary Commission has gone through a long process of comparing salaries, doing research,
and providing salary recommendations to Council for approval just to have Council reject their
proposals. He said the goal is that once the Salary Commission goes through their process, their
recommendation becomes law without Council's approval.
Mr. Courson provided that the Salary Commission would only have the complete authority to set a
maximum salary; the actual amount that any person would get paid would be at the discretion of
their respective appointing authority.
Ms. Sandblom stated that the Commission had concerns when the amendment was initially proposed
and through the course of discussions and opinions, the language is more to nullify a potential
political problem. She said when you look at the proposed language, also inserted was the need to
have the Director of Human Resources and the Director of Finance as part of the process.
Mr. TenBruggencate said the word "complete" is to make it clear that the authority is no longer
shared with Council; however, he wouldn't object to removing "complete" from the proposed
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 23, 2018
Page 7
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
amendment.
Mr. TenBruggencate
moved to amend CRC
2017-13 by removing the
word "complete." Mr.
Stack seconded the
motion. Motion carried
5:0.
Motion, as amended,
carried 5:0.
CRC 2017-14 Proposed Charter Amendment to Amend Article VII, Subsection 7.06 by_giving the
Mr. TenBruggencate
Administrator of the Office of Boards and Commissions the authority to appoint or procure a
moved to approve CRC
hearings officer for the County of Kauai (deferred 3119118)
2017-14. Mr. Watanabe
seconded the motion.
Motion carried 5:0.
Announcements
Next Meeting: Monday, May 21, 2018, 3:00 p.m., in the Mo'ikeha Building, Meeting Room 2 AB
Adjournment
Chair Suzawa adjourned
the meeting at 4:15 p.m.
Submitted by:
Lani Agoot, Administrative Specialist
() Approved as circulated.
() Approved with amendments. See minutes of
Reviewed and Approved by:
meeting.
Carol Suzawa, Chair