HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018_1207_BOE OP Minutes DRAFTCOUNTY OF KAUAI
Minutes of Special Meeting
OPEN SESSION
MAIPT 101 A j
0110, ,�pgrjgu&
Board/Commission:
I BOARD OF ETHICS
Meeting Date
December 7, 2018
Location
Mo`ikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A/2B
Start of Meeting: 1:00 p.m.
I End of Meeting: 1:21 p.m.
Present
Chair Michael Curtis. Vice Chair Maureen Tabura (entered at 1:03 p.m). Secretary Mia Shiraishi. Members: Susan Burriss, Dean
Toyofuku, and Ryan de la Pena.
Also: Office of the County Attorney: First Deputy County Attorney (former Administrator of Boards and Commissions) Nicholas R.
Courson and Deputy County Attorney Mark Bradbury. Boards & Commissions Office Staff: Support Clerk Darcie Agaran.
Excused
Mary Tudela
Absent
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Call To Order
Chair Curtis called the meeting to
order at 1:00 p.m. with five
members present which constituted
a quorum.
Approval of
Open Session Minutes of October 19, 2018
Minutes
Hearing no changes, corrections, or additions, Chair Curtis entertained a motion to
approve the minutes.
Mr. de la Pena moved to approve
the Open Session minutes of
October 19, 2018, as circulated.
Ms. Burriss seconded the motion.
Motion carried 4:0:1 (Abstention -
Ms. Shiraishi).
Communication
There was no communication.
Request for an
Request for an AdvisoryOpinion from Ellen Ching regarding her appointment as the
Administrator of Boards and Commissions
Advisory
Opinion
Board of Ethics — Special Meeting
Open Session
December 7, 2018 Page 2
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Ms. Ellen Ching thanked for the Board for convening a Special Meeting. She noted that
she submitted a letter dated November 23, 2018, disclosing her reasons for her request,
and that she was open to any questions from the Board.
Ms. Tabura entered the meeting at 1: 03 p.m.
Chair Curtis stated he understood there was a potential conflict of interest with Ms.
Ching's husband, Mr. Belles, representing several clients before various boards and
commissions. He asked if Ms. Ching was capable of administering the Boards and
Commissions without a conflict of interest and recusing herself if there was one to
which Ms. Ching replied, "Absolutely."
Ms. Shiraishi asked, for clarification, if Ms. Ching's function as the Administrator was
not to influence any board or commission members as to how they vote or decide, and
that her function would be administrative and operational to which Ms. Ching replied
yes.
Hearing no further questions, Chair Curtis entertained a motion.
Mr. de la Pena moved to find no
conflict of interest. Ms. Burriss
seconded the motion. Motion
carried 6:0.
Disclosures
1. Donald G. Kolenda — Board of Review
2. Felicia E. Cowden — County Council
3. Luke A. Evslin — County Council
4. Ellen M. Ching — Administrator of Boards and Commissions
Chair Curtis noted that Mr. Kolenda listed "Carol" as his spouse and assumed that her
last name is "Kolenda" as well. He asked if that presumption could be made. Ms.
Burriss didn't think they could and suggested that they do a conditional approval.
Board of Ethics — Special Meeting
Open Session
December 7, 2018 Page 3
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Mr. de la Pena noted that Ms. Ching's disclosure didn't include her new position's
income. Chair Curtis stated that she wasn't approved for it yet and that she will have 30
days to update her disclosure.
Chair Curtis entertained a motion to receive Donald Kolenda's disclosure statement as
complete, subject to the confirmation that his spouse's name is "Carol Kolenda."
Ms. Burriss moved to accept
Disclosure 1 as complete, subject to
the confirmation that his spouse's
name is "Carol Kolenda." Ms.
Tabura seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0.
Chair Curtis entertained a motion to approve Disclosures 2, 3, and 4 for Felicia Cowden,
Luke Evslin, and Ellen Ching, respectively, as complete.
Mr. de la Pena moved to accept
Disclosures 2, 3, and 4 as complete.
Mr. Toyofaku seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6:0.
Business
BOE 2018-17 Explicit recommendation on the steps to be taken at the Charter level and
the administrative level to improve the existingcounWyide disclosure requirement
coupled with a fine schedule for non-compliance
First Deputy County Attorney and former Administrator of Boards and Commissions
Nicholas Courson reiterated that he felt an ordinance was the easiest way to implement a
fine schedule, and that it was consistent with what the other jurisdictions have done. He
explained that they would need a sponsoring councilmember, which should be easy if
the work was done prior to it being sent to Council. Mr. Courson stated that the Board
could ask its new counsel, Deputy County Attorney Maryann Sasaki, to draft the
proposed bill for the Board's consideration. Once the Board agrees with the proposal,
then it could be submitted to Council for their consideration.
Chair Curtis asked the Board how they wanted to move forward.
Board of Ethics — Special Meeting
Open Session
December 7, 2018 Page 4
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Mr. de la Pena pointed out that there was a suggested fine schedule included in their
meeting packet.
Ms. Burriss moved to adopt the
recommended fine schedule. Mr.
de la Pena seconded the motion.
Discussion:
Instead of saying "first class mail," Ms. Shiraishi suggested to revise it to say "certified
restricted delivery" so that they could obtain confirmation that the person received the
notification.
Ms. Shiraishi moved to amend the
fine schedule to change "first class
mail" to "certified restricted
delivery." Ms. Tabura seconded the
motion.
Discussion:
Ms. Burriss noted that she had a problem with certified mail on the first go -around as
there is a lot of admin and costs involved.
Ms. Shiraishi felt that it was important to be informed that the person received the
notification and the date they received it for tracking purposes since the penalty would
be assessed after the loth day.
Mr. Toyofuku asked who the responsible entity to monitor the fines was. Mr. Courson
stated that with the disclosure requirements being triggered upon material change, it will
be hard to be proactive. He added that the fine schedule was more of a reactive thing
when it's brought to the Board's attention that someone did not update their disclosure.
Mr. Toyofuku asked if the disclosure requirement could be changed to which Mr.
Courson replied yes, but that it would entail a charter amendment, so it was not as easily
done. However, the easy path in that situation would be to approach the Charter Review
Commission for a possible amendment on the 2020 ballot.
Board of Ethics — Special Meeting
Open Session
December 7, 2018
Page 5
SUBJECT
DISCUSSION
ACTION
Ms. Tabura noted that it would be voted on by the public, so there was no guarantee that
the amendment would pass.
Chair Curtis requested for a list of the positions and appointees responsible for
submitting a disclosure statement, as well as the notification that a new disclosure is
required within 30 days of any change in the items required to be disclosed, so that the
rules and penalties are spelled out for everyone.
Hearing no further discussion, Chair Curtis called for the vote on the amendment.
Motion carried 6:0.
Chair Curtis called for the vote on the main motion.
Motion carried 6:0.
Executive
There was no Executive Session.
Session
Announcements
Next Meeting: Friday, January 18, 2019 — 1:00 p.m., Mo`ikeha Building, Liquor
Conference Room 3
Adjournment
With no objections, Chair Curtis
adjourned the meeting at 1:21 p.m.
Submitted by:
Darcie Agaran, Staff Support Clerk
() Approved as circulated.
() Approved with amendments. See minutes of
Reviewed and Approved by:
meeting.
Michael Curtis, Chair