Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember17,2016KHPRCAGENDAPACKET2MEETING OF THE RECEIVED KAUA'I COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2016 3:00 p.m. (or soon thereafter) ' �� L hu'e Civic Center, Moikeha Building Meeting Room 2Al2B C t� pf- 4444 Rice Street Llhu'e Kaua'i PIE CC U4TY CLERK COUNTY UE KAUAI AGENDA A. CALL TO ORDER B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA C. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 27, 2016 MEETING MINUTES D. PUBLIC COMMENT - Individuals may orally testify on items on this agenda during the Public Comment Period. Please call the Planning Department prior to the meeting or notify Commission Staff at the meeting site. Testimony shall also be accepted when the agenda item is taken up by the Commission. However if an individual has already testified during this period, additional testimony at the agenda item testimony may be allowed at the discretion of the Chair. Testifiers shall limit their testimony to three (3) minutes, but may be extended longer at the discretion of the Chair. Written testimony is also accepted. An original and twelve (12) copies of written testimony can be hand delivered to the Planning Department or submitted to Commission Staff at the meeting site. E. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS F. COMMUNICATIONS G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS National Historic Preservation Act, Section t06 and Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 6E, Memorandum of Agreement Discussion Hanapepe Bridge Replacement Project, Project No. 141 STP SR50(1) Waimea District, Kauai Island, Koloa Ahupuaa TMK: [4] 1-9-007: 001 Hanapepe Canal, [4] 1-9-007:013, [4] 1-9-007:034, [4] 1- 9-007 Kaumualii Highway Right -of -Way, [4] 1-9-010:015, [4] 1-9-010:014, [4] 1-9-010:046, [4] 1-9-010:050, [4] 1-9-010 Kaumualii Highway Right-of-way November 17, 2016 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Agenda Page 2 2. Presentation by the Planning Department Regarding Overview of the General Plan Process and Schedule Moving Forward, and a Review of the Draft Heritage Resources Map. 3. Proposed draft Rules of Practice and Procedure of the County of Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission. 4. Discussion on the status of the Certified Local Government. H. NEW BUSINESS 1. Kilauea Elementary School TMK: 5-2-009:006 2440 Kolo Road, Kilauea, Kauai Renovation of Building B. 2. National Historic Preservation Action Section 106 Consultation Lihue Town Core Mobility and Revitalization District of Lihue, Island of Kauai, Ahupuaa of Kalapaki Federal -Aid Project No. TGR 0700 (073) Project involving Right of Ways of Eiwa Street, Rice Street, Hoala Street, Pualole and Malae Streets, and the Shared Use Path from the Lihue Civic Center to the War Memorial Convention Hall. I. COMMISSION EDUCATION COMMITTEE J. KAUAI HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY UPDATE COMMITTEE K. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PUBLICITY COMMITTEE 1. Update on the permitted interaction group (PIG) for publicizing historic preservation efforts. November 17, 2016 K.H.P.R.C. Meeting Agenda Page 3 L. DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS (December 22, 2016) M. ADJOURNMENT EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Commission may go into an executive session on an agenda item for one of the permitted purposes listed in Section 92-5(a) Hawaii Revised Statutes ("H.R.S."), without noticing the executive session on the agenda where the executive session was not anticipated in advance. HRS Section 92-7(a). The executive session may only be held, however, upon an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members present, which must also be the majority of the members to which the board is entitled. HRS Section 92-4. The reason for holding the executive session shall be publicly announced. Note: Special accommodations and sign language interpreters are available upon request five (5) days prior to the meeting date, to the County Planning Department, 4444 Rice Street, Suite 473, Lihue, Hawaii 96766. Telephone: 241-4050. KAUA`I COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION Lihu`e Civic Center, Mo`ikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A/2B MINUTES A regular meeting of the Kauai County Historic Preservation Commission (KHPRC) was held on October 27, 2016 in the Lihu`e Civic Center, Mo`ikeha Building, Meeting Room 2A/2B. The following Commissioners were present: Chairperson Anne Scluzeider, Vice Chair Victoria Wichman, Larry Chaffin Jr., Charlotte Hoomanawanui, Stephen Long, and Deatri Nakea. The following Commissioner was absent: Althea Arinaga, Pat Griffin, and David Helder. The following staff members were present: Planning Department — Kaaina Hull, Shanlee Jimenez, Myles Hironaka, Leanora Kaiaokamalie; Office of the County Attorney — Deputy County Attorney Jodi Higuchi Sayegusa; Office of Boards and Commissions — Administrator Jay Furfaro (left at 4:22 p.m.), Commission Support Clerk Darcie Agaran. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. Deputy Planning Director Kaaina Hull: Good afternoon, Chair and members of the Commission. First agcnda item is Roll Call. Commissioner Arinaga is excused. Commissioner Chaffin? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Here. Mr. Hull: Commissioner Griffin is excused. Commissioner Hoomanawanui? Ms. Hoomanawanui: Here. Mr. Hull: Commissioner Long? Mr. Long: Here. Mr. Hull: Commissioner Nakea? Ms. Nakea: Here. Mr. Hull: Commissioner Schneider? Ms. Schneider: Here. Mr. Hull: Commissioner Wichman? October27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 2 Ms. Wichinan: Here. Mr. Hull: We have quorum. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Mr. Hull: The second agenda item is Approval of the Agenda. Chair, given that there are some applicants on Kauai today from other islands, we recommend moving our Unfinished Business, G.1. and 2., to after K so that we can accommodate theirs at a sooner time. Ms. Schneider: Do I have a motion to adjust the agenda as stated? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I'll snake the motion. Ms. Schneider: Do I have a second? Ms. Wiclunan: Second. Ms. Schneider: Any discussion? All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Motion's approved 6:0. APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 25, 2016 MEETING MINUTES Mr. Hull: Next on the agenda is Approval of the August 25, 2016 Meeting Minutes. Ms. Wichman: Move to approve the minutes. Ms. Nakea: I second. Ms. Schneider: All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Anybody opposed? No? Motion carries 6:0. NEW BUSINESS Re: Honolulu, Ltd TMK: 3-8-04:14 4479 Rice Street, Lihu`e, Kauai Proposed New Roof for Existing Restaurant Building. Mr. Hull: Okay. With the adjustment to the agenda, the next agenda item is H, New Business. Business Item No. 1, Honolulu, Ltd., TMK: 3-8-004:014, 4479 Rice Street, Lihu`e, Kauai, a proposed new roof for existing restaurant building. Is the applicant here? October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 3 Ms. Schneider: Is the applicant here? PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Hull: Excuse me, Chair, the attorney is reminding me that we actually skipped the Public Comment Period, so bear with me. (Laughter) Agenda Item D, Public Comment. Individuals may orally testify on items on this agenda during the public comment period. Are there any members of the public that would like to testify on agenda items? Ms. Schneider: Guess not. Mr. Hull: Thank you, Jodi. (Laughter) NEW BUSINESS (Continued) Re: Honolulu, Ltd TMK: 3-8-04:14 4479 Rice Street, Lihu`e, Kauai Proposed New Roof for Existing Restaurant Building. Mr. Hull: I would recommend ... because I believe that the applicant's representative for the restaurant building did plan to appear, so perhaps we could table that agenda item. Ms. Schneider: Do we need a motion for that? Deputy County Attorney Jodi Higuchi Sayegusa: Could you please get a motion for that? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I'll make a motion to approve... Mr. Hull: Oh, it would be a motion to table Agenda Item H.1. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Thank you. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Ms. Wichman: Second. Ms. Schneider: All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Motion carries 6:0. Re: National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 and Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 6E, Memorandum of Agreement Discussion October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 4 Hanapepe Bridge Replacement Project, Project No. HI STP SR50(1) Waimea District, Kauai Island, Koloa Ahupua`a TMK: [41 1-9-007: 001 Hanapepe Canal, [41 1-9-007:013, [4] 1-9-007:034, [41 1-9-007 Kaumuali`i Highway Right -of -Way, 141 1-9-010:015, [41 1-9-010:014, [41 1-9-010:046, [41 1-9-010:050, [41 1-9-010 Kaumuali`i Highway Right -of -Way Mr. Hull: So the next agenda item is H.2. National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 and Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 6E, Memorandum of Agreement discussion concerning Hanapepe Bridge Replacement Project, Project No. HI STP SR50(1), Waimea District, Kauai Island, K61oa Ahupua`a, TMK: 1-9-007:001 Hanapepe Canal, and TMKs: 1-9-007:013; 1-9- 007:034; 1-9-007 Kaumuali`i Highway Right -of -Way; 1-9-010:015, 014, 046, 050, and 010. I believe the applicants are here. If you guys could speak into the microphone and at least identify yourselves for the minutes, and then... Thomas Parker: Thomas Parker, Environmental Specialist with the Federal Highway Administration. Mike Will: My name is Mike Will. I am the Engineering Program Manager with the Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Division. Mr. Hull: Sorry, gentlemen, for the sake of the minutes, if you could, while giving the presentation, speak into the microphone. Thank you. Mr. Parker: I apologize. It's a little out of focus. Good afternoon. We wanted to meet with the Commission regarding the Hanapdpd... the State 1938 Hanapdpd River Bridge and the proposed replacement, and to discuss the Memorandum of Agreement that has been initiated with the State Historic Preservation Division to see if the Commission would like to be a concurring party to that Memorandum of Agreement. So for those familiar with the 1938 Hanapdpd River Bridge, it is located in Hanapepd Town and it has been identified as a structurally deficient, scour critical structure that is in desperate need of replacement. We have recently completed the HEPA/NEPA process and all approvals for the replacement of this structure. We understand that the County is also working on a 1911 bridge. I don't want to confuse it with the county bridge just upstream, so that's the location of this structure. Some of the structural deficient natures find the foundation deterioration. It currently doesn't meet load or seismic requirements for this type of structure as well. Here are just a few snapshots of the existing state of the structure and its debilitated nature. Ms. Hoomanawanui left the meeting at 3:07 p.m. Mr. Parker: So the goals of the project are to, obviously, maintain a safe and functional stream crossing given the high usage of this bridge while maintaining design similarities with the existing October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 5 historic structure. So that's the existing structure and its current view shed, and then this is a rendering of the proposed replacement structure. Mr. Long: Are you not focused? Mr. Parker: I don't know why this... Ms. Schneider: It's hard to see the detail. Mr. Parker: We do have a view ... a better rendering of the actual rail. This is more the ... you can see the shape of the arched girders... Mr. Long: No. I can't. Mr. Parker: Okay. Mr. Long: I can't. I can't see anything. There you go. Mr. Parker: Let's go back. That's the existing structure. Obviously, some of the aesthetics of the existing girders are hidden by a debris shield which protects a utility line on the structure that was added post -construction. Our current design places utilities in a safer location between girders so that they aren't at risk of impact from debris coming downstream; so there is a sewer line and a water line that are ... that cross the river on this structure. Here's the rendering of the proposed replacement. Obviously, without the debris shield, you can actually see the arched girders and some of those aesthetic treatments for that structure. Mr. Long: Can you put them side -by -side? Instead of going back and forth, can you ... can we look at them together? Mr. Parker: Currently, it's in a PowerPoint, but I can do a quick manipulation if that's beneficial. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I have a question while you are working on that. Mr. Parker: Of course. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: We have a submittal for H.2. that's about a quarter half -inch thick. Ms. Hoomanawanui returned to the meeting at 3:09 p.m. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Is this your executive summary of this? Mr. Parker: No, the Memorandum of Agreement was included with the letter, so that's the actual Memorandum of Agreement that's been executed with the State Historic Preservation Division. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I don't think that answers my question. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 6 Mr. Parker: No, an executive summary was not provided with this. I believe my predecessor who ... Nicole Winterton had met with the Commission to discuss the project in its past, but she has taken a new position and I'm stepping in as her replacement. So it was my understanding that the Coirunission had some briefing in the past regarding the proposed structure. Mr. Long: When was that? Mr. Will: It was probably a year and a half ago perhaps. Ms. Schneider: Yes. It came before us before. I think the question was the spacing of the balustrade and how it was going to look. Mr. Long: Well, thank you. That was really (inaudible) of you to do that. Mr. Parker: So ... I mean, one thing of note on the existing structure, baluster spacing is irregular. Towards the center of the existing structure — I don't know if I can show you with the mouse — but on the right side, you'll notice in the center span there are three (3) balusters which are irregularly spaced. The proposed design would be a more uniform spacing. One main criteria is that the existing rail does not meet current crash -testing or safety requirements. There are several protrusions on the inner ... or extend beyond current standards. So we chose a crash -tested rail that would closely mimic the existing rail, and I do have a more close-up visual. Ms. Schneider: It's really hard to see in this... Mr. Parker: No, and that one, of course ... so this is a more close-up view of the proposed rail and baluster spacing. Mr. Long: And how does that compare to the existing? Like the before/after. Can you just go back to before? Mr. Parker: Yeah. So the existing does have a slightly different window opening. Mr. Long: Right. Mr. Parker: But that existing design doesn't currently meet the same standards. Mr. Long: Do you have a picture of it? I mean, I can't see it. A picture of the existing and ... I mean, no, a picture of the rail and the window. Are you... so you don't have it? Mr. Parker: No, we are not replicating directly (inaudible). Mr. Long: Right. But you don't have a picture of the two (2) to compare? Mr. Parker: No. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 7 Mr. Long: We've run into this issue before and the engineers have been able to come up with something that's similar, but since you don't have a photo here for us to talk about... Mr. Parker: Well, no, I understand, but ... so the problem with modifying a rail is that crash -testing standards are quite rigorous. So modifying a crash -tested rail, even slightly, can trigger physical crash -testing, which is a labor-intensive and cost -intensive proposal. So the standard position when you are proposing a replacement structure... especially when we did a rehabilitation analysis and given the major structural deficiencies of this, preserving the character -defining features of this structure is not possible. So just to restore the foundational elements would require demolition and damage and adverse effects to those historic character -defining features. So we did a full replication analysis in coordination with the State Historic Preservation Division to make sure we were fully vetting that alternative. It was identified that we are obviously having an adverse effect of this historical property. Mr. Long: Yeah, and aren't there, like, standard details developed? I mean, there are standard Federal/State Highway details. And so I just want to know that since you don't have a photo here for us to look at, before and after — you have the after, but you don't have the before — we can't really comment on it, but to ask you, are there a number of different profiles that you examined would that fit within that crash... Mr. Will: So just to give you an idea, we reached out nationally; comparing various types of rails, looking for something that ... I mean, you are never going to replicate something that doesn't meet a standard, but found something that compliments it and that's ... you know, that's as close as we got. Really, there are two (2) goals here. When we went out to the public with our first public meeting, you know, the bridge is scour -critical and it's got severe deficiencies with the foundation. The truckers communicated to us, as they are going across the bridge, this bridge is spongey and it's scary, so there's an apparent urgency to advance the construction of this project. So when we go back and we starting looking at crash -testing bridge rail, I know that's kind of a good fallback to try and get a closer look, but what happens is the engineers, when they go through and design something that replicates it, you think you've got something that might pass, you'll run through this whole process. It could take two (2) years to find out that you are still not meeting the right crash -test level, so then you have to circle back, redesign, and (inaudible). Mr. Long: Yeah, thanks a lot. You answered my question, so I'm satisfied with that. Thanks. Mr. Will: Okay. Mr. Long: This element here, are you replicating that in any way? Mr. Parker: The end monument? Mr. Long: Yes, end monument. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 8 Mr. Parker: So the current end monuments, as you can see, have a large protrusion, and so our proposed end monument provides a safer transition for an errant vehicle that could contact the rail or the W-beam guardrail. Mr. Long: Can you go back? Mr. Parker: Of course. Mr. Will: So our safety folks are (inaudible) that 3-foot notch -in (inaudible) laid against those kinds of features within the clear zone that's... Mr. Long: Okay, so ... after? Mr. Parker: Of course. Mr. Long: Okay. So here's a question for you. I understand that that end monument pedestal needs to be flush with the guardrail for safety purposes. Yet, couldn't it look more like the before? I mean, go back to before. See, that's got a flush face on it, you know, with some fancy little scroll and this and that. Couldn't one replicate that and still adhere to the flush crash codes? Ms. Schneider: Without the (inaudible). Mr. Long: Yeah, just move it this way. Mr. Parker: So, the existing rail has several notches and protrusions to give some of this ... in the center photo, you can see there's several chamfered edges. In discussions with our safety engineers and standards, even a magnitude of inches is a consideration that we must look at because curbs and protrusions within these rails can result in rapid deceleration of a vehicle or snag hazards if a vehicle encounters... Mr. Long: If you go to after, basically what you have is a guardrail that comes in and tenninates at some kind of flushed surface that's flushed with the face of the guardrail. Mr. Parker: Correct. Mr. Long: So, you even have part of that new end monument that goes past the rail; you have it rectilinear. I mean, it doesn't do anything to protect the safety of cars going over the bridge or crashing. So I'm asking, why can't your rectilinear end monument have some scroll curvilinear aesthetic feature that doesn't interfere with the function? Mr. Parker: So I think one important distinction is to note that the final structure is proposing standard roadway shoulders as well, which... October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 9 Mr. Long: Why couldn't you just add this ... see this... So what I'm asking is, if this element here, the curvilinear element, cannot even just be stuck onto the new proposed — right here — behind the new proposed guardrail to maintain the aesthetic feature without impacting your safety concerns. Mr. Parker: No, I understand your point. I think a primary criteria is that, currently, W-beam has to be bolted and secured for that continuity at this location as well, which currently does not exist on the existing structure. In addition, standard roadway shoulders have been added to bring this bridge up to code. So an important note is, if you look in that photo...sorry, that photo there, you have the roadway lane going straight into the sidewalk. The existing structure is a multi -modal design which accommodates a proper roadway shoulder which could facilitate bicyclists and then a grade separated sidewalk, so it is a wider structure as well, which helps provide some of the additional safety considerations for the structure so that errant vehicle doesn't immediately contact a curb. I mean, I understand this half-moon shape at the end of the structure, but it does tie to the bolting point to that W-beam. Mr. Long: I don't think you heard me. Did the other gentleman understand what I said? Mr. Will: Yeah, I think I understand what you're saying. (Inaudible) Mr. Long: Okay. Could you help me out a little bit? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Perhaps maybe, you know... Mr. Long: Because every single word you said doesn't address anything that I'm concerned about, so if we have a miscommunication (inaudible) graphically. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Perhaps you can direct your questions through the Chair. Mr. Long: Okay. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: And then the Chair can control, you know, the course of the meeting, and perhaps we can allow the presenters to finish their presentation. Mr. Long: Okay. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Thank you. Mr. Long: Go ahead. Ms. Schneider: Go ahead. I understand Stephen's concerns, and if you can illustrate in some way how it could be accomplished, or if it could be. Mr. Will: Okay, so I think what you're trying to ask is, is there a way to add some of the more aesthetic features to that end terminal to what we're proposing, and we did some of that. I mean, we've got this little indentation to allow for the naming of the bridge, the stamping of the year of October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 10 the bridge ... of the new replacement structure. As far as the end section goes, you know, it's ... those curvilinear aspects, they create rolling hazards if a vehicle ramps up on it. Tri-beam rail has deflection, right? So the tri-beam rail is going to deflect as a vehicle hits it. I think there is some potential safety concerns. I don't think it's something that cannot be designed. It's something that we certainly could take a look at and speak with our safety folks. I'm not quite sure the benefits. I know where you're going with it. I mean, there's always a desire to create more of an aesthetic feature that compliments the historic nature. I think we've gone through a pretty exhaustive effort focusing on the main component of the bridge, which is the rail itself. The transitional section replicates transitions on other quadrants of the bridge. The quadrant that you're looking at ... we were there this afternoon looking at that and I did see that arched shape. You know, it's more for the structural and safety folks. I don't know, because that tri-beam is going to be this thick, that you're really going to be able to see the arched shape because it's going to have to be ... the rail is going to have to be mounted in front of it, so I don't know that you'll truly get the benefit that you're seeking from an aesthetic standpoint. Mr. Long: Maybe not from the bridge, but from outside looking in you would. Ms. Schneider: The other side, yeah. Mr. Will: From the outside looking in. Ms. Schneider: And it would look more finished. Mr. Parker: The other important consideration, if I may, is that on one portion of this project on the mauka, eastern edge, you have a flood levee wall that ties into the end of the bridge, which is an important connection point for continuity of the stricture into this flood protection levee. And the existing half-moon shape, you know, you're discussing is a harder connection point in that flood transition, especially at this point. They have had to retrofit that in, if you visit the stricture. Mr. Long: Madam Chair? Ms. Schneider: Yes. Mr. Long: Could I ask if the applicant could put the two (2) photos together — before and after — like on the other one? Ms. Schneider: Could you do that for us, please? Mr. Long: Excuse me. I really don't mean to be giving you a hard time, but it's ... I'm looking at it and I think that we can all do a better job, you know, combining the aesthetics and the structural and the safety concerns. It's just a feeling. I think if we talked about it a little bit more, I think we might be able to... Mr. Will: Yeah, you know, and we value the aesthetics. We heard from the community the significance of the aesthetics. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes' Page l I Mr. Long: Okay. Mr. Will: So we also heard from the community the significance of the aesthetics. And just to, kind of, give you a little chronological timeline on the process, traditionally, when we approach bridge work, we look at the function initially. So when we went to the public, we presented two (2) different bridge types. It's significantly less expensive to build a traditional, straight girder bridge that could be constructed significantly faster, significantly cheaper, but we heard that the arched shape was very prominent... was a very prominent feature, so we honed in on that. Those girders that we're proposing are all going to be custom cast girders. The bridge rail, again, that was a national search to try and find something that replicates. Mr. Long: Okay. So I'm just winging it here, but what I see here is this element at the beginning of the end monument. That element and that element are similar, you know? They're ... they mark an end and they're rectilinear and they stick up above the railing, and you have a step on it. Now, your step is only stepped on two (2) edges, not on four (4) edges. Mr. Parker: Correct. Mr. Long: Such as that and I don't know, you know, if taking away a little bit of concrete on the edges, you know... Ms. Schneider: Could we do a cast repair? Mr. Long: So that's one ... that's just one small, you know, detail that one might consider. Then, you come over here. I see this recessed panel here and here, but on the existing, I see another end monument that sticks up above the railing height. So I don't know why one couldn't take, in the new example, this element here and repeat it right here. Mr. Will: Because that's a higher elevation. We need to transition from the top of the guardrail to the top of the bridge rail and it needs to be a (inaudible) transition. Mr. Long: I understand. Could it be this much higher? So the pedestal doesn't have to come all the way straight on. I understand that you have to transition it, but couldn't one put another vertical end monument element like that that's similar? I mean, I see one, one, one, one. And then on this curvilinear element, it's really just taking off part of that or extending it. And also, I see that the ledge, here, at the bottom of your railing on the existing extends all the way across, so it kind of forms like a base and so, here, on yours is just straight and disappears. So in my looking at it, there's maybe five (5) or six (6) small aesthetic changes that one could consider and balance with the safety. Mr. Will: Sure. And, again, you know, those minor changes ... I mean, absolutely. They are something we could take a look at. I think there's... Ms. Schneider: I think that that would make... Octobei 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 12 Mr. Will: I'm sorry? Ms. Schneider: I think it would improve the design, somewhat, at the end and give it a little bit more look as the original did. Mr. Will: Sure. So from a Federal Highways standpoint, historically in the past when you have a crash -tested rail that has been given a certification passing of various test level, in the past, Federal Highways would allow minor modifications to that rail to address some of the aesthetic features. More recently, they pulled back on that due to liability risk. The second you modify an existing design that has been crash -tested, you're sticking your neck out for liability. You lose that certification. As it relates to the transition rail, whether or not that's a standard transition rail or if that's a specifically designed transition rail, that's something I'm not sure about. I'm questioning it just because of some of the features associated with it. It doesn't appear to be a standard transition rail, and if that follows the same process that we deal with with regards to the actual bridge rail in itself. Mr. Parker: The Commission's comments are noted and it's something that I think we can take back to our safety experts and design group to see what thresholds exist. Ms. Schneider: Go ahead, Stephen. Go ahead. Mr. Long: Yeah, and just in closing, thank you very much for listening to me. I really believe that we're just ... I mean, what you propose, those chamfered steps on top of that pedestal, if you can do it there, why can you not do it at something that looks similar down at the other end? And the other ... the curvilinear thing could just be a tack on. I mean, literally, just ... you got your break wall here, just stick it; it just goes ... a curvilinear tack on. And that way you see that from the other side ... I mean, from the ... outside the bridge elevations and it's a prominent feature. Mr. Will: Sure, and we'll take a look at that. Mr. Long: Thank you. Mr. Will: We'll take a look at that. I just ... I know where our safety folks sit sometimes and that's a critical element in the crash effectiveness of the bridge because it is transitioning from a flexible barrier to a rigid barrier. Mr. Long: When you do comeback in front of us, could you please have... Ms. Schneider: A before and after. Mr. Long: Not like this, but could you have elevation drawings, not just that. Ms. Schneider: Yeah, (it'd) be much clearer for us because this is... Mr. Will: Sure. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 13 Mr. Long: Elevation drawings, you know, existing and proposed, so then we can start lining up the bases and some of those elements that you can push and pull. Mr. Will: Sure. Mr. Long: Thank you. Ms. Schneider: Thank you. Mr. Parker: The main purpose for our attending this meeting, as well as to see if the Commission wishes to be a current party on the MOA and some of those... So, the temporary... given the structural deficient nature of this, a temporary bridge is anticipated with advertisement this winter as a bypass around this structure, and with a pennanent bridge advertisement in 2017 of sometime to be determined. Ms. Sclmeider: And how long would it take to build this bridge? Mr. Parker: Approximately eighteen (18) months total is what we're estimating at this time. It's a very complicated site. It's a ... the temporary structure has to go above the existing flood wall to ensure continuity and protection of the community throughout construction. It's a multiple -span temporary structure. Obviously, in addition to historic resources, there's a concern for endangered species, water quality, and all of those require even more diligence on our part for construction oversight and management, so... Mr. Will: Again, back to the urgency, you know, we're actually advertising for the temporary bridge. That solicitation's planned to go out by the end of the week; maybe early next week. So there will be a temporary bridge construction mauka of the existing bridge between the county bridge and the state bridge, okay? That is anticipated to start in late January. At the completion of that, I believe, we're still waiting on funding direction from the State, but with the temporary bridge going in, there's a desire to immediately follow up with the pennanent bridge contract. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I assume you have all the roadway right-of-ways in place. Mr. Will: We are in process, so there's offer letters with the owners. If there's issues, the functional need and the need for the transportation project is there to support any activities that would be necessary to make sure that we can continue with that action. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: That may take longer than you anticipate.... suspect. Mr. Will: We've just gone through that with our Saddle Road project on the Big Island. It's funny how obligation of Federal funding in the millions of dollars tends to nurse things along. (Laughter in background) Mr. Parker: During our consultation with the State Historic Preservation Division, we did initiate and executed a Memorandum of Agreement with numerous stipulations regarding HAB/HAER October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 14 documentation of the existing stricture, and obviously ensuring that that documentation is provided and cataloged with the National Park Service, as well as ... more importantly to note that we identified a potential interpretation possibility by salvaging existing seginents of rail and an end monument with the name or end date that could be used in an interpretation to ensure that that historic design does have some continuity going forward. So this E stipulation is speaking about a larger interpretation that could be available, not only about the bridge, but it's setting within Hanapepe Town, the river, that valley, and it's history. So it's ... it even provides a possibility where you could include interpretation of the upstream 1911 bridge and how they relate to each other. We've even discussed possibilities of mounting an interpretation plaque on the outside of the rail, so that pedestrians walking across the sidewalk would have an interpretation opportunity on the bridge. So that is one of the main mitigation measures in addition to the design considerations that were given to the structure. And a lot of the layout and formalization of that interpreted material is to be done in a collaborative manner with all concurring parties, so if the Commission elects to be a concurring party and participate in those discussions, then they would be a party at the table along with other members. Ms. Schneider: So you have our concerns. (Laughter) Mr. Parker: Yes. Ms. Schneider: Our resident bridge expert is actually not here today who has been able to comment on many bridges and it would be good if she was here. Mr. Parker: And I know that there was initial consideration that the Commission did give during the HEPAINEPA process on this project and those considerations were taken into account during development of the design that you saw. Ms. Schneider: Thank you. Commissioners, any questions? Do we have a motion? Do we need a motion? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Yes. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I have, not a question, but a comment. I think this submittal that was in our packet could've been or should've been an executive summary because going through all this, it's time consuming and (inaudible) questioning (inaudible) this large stack of papers. Mr. Parker: Understood. Ms. Schneider: Stephen. Mr. Long: I have another comment, and that is that what the public sees are the really curvilinear ends and the bridge end. There's nothing in this package that we were given today ... the slides that you showed us aren't in this package, so there was no way for us to prepare ourselves, you know, for the presentation; that's why I went on (inaudible). October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 15 Ms. Scluieider: Right. There were no elevations, no sections, no ... of the bridge. Mr. Parker: No, understood. Ms. Schneider: Yeah. Mr. Parker: And, you know, I'll apologize for that. It was my understanding that some of the initial design material had been provided to the Commission as part of the initial reviews and discussions regarding the status of the project. Ms. Schneider: Right, but that was some time ago and commission members may have changed, so they're not all ... been privy to the original. Mr. Will: And, really, the purpose for us coming in front of the Commission was to talk through the MOA and the desire for... Ms. Schneider: Memorandum. Mr. Will: Yeah. For the Coirunission to participate in some of this mitigation work that we are going to be working on. Mr. Long: I have a question, Madam Chair. Ms. Schneider: Go ahead. Mr. Long: From this meeting, has the applicant proposed that they're going to go back and take a look at some of the design features we discussed and come back and show us or tell us what you found out? Mr. Will: We can certainly do that. We can certainly do that. Again, I feel like it is off -topic, though. Ms. Schneider: Are we taking you off your timeline? Mr. Parker: Just so the Commission is aware, final design had already been completed on this project as part of this replacement bridge, so, you know, the comments require reopening that component of the project. As part of our completion of the HEPA 106 and 6E process and those numerous components of this project, the FONSI was signed for this project in September of this year, and as Mike indicated, the temporary bridge was the first component moving forward just given the urgency of the structure, but the permanent replacement was proposed shortly thereafter. Mr. Will: So it was more of a courtesy to check -in. Mr. Parker: On the MOA and, specifically, the mitigation measures that had been identified through consultation with SHPD, especially on the development and what those interpretation October 27,2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 16 materials could look like; locations. Obviously if we salvage a large section or section of rail and an end monument, those are very large, bulky components, so where that is housed and what that interpretation looks like have a lot of options. Mr. Will: And that's where your input would be appreciated as being a party to that. Ms. Schneider: Yes, Larry. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I have a specific comment on your mitigation measures on the second page on the back. It says FHWA shall ensure that all documentation activities will be perfonned or directly supervised, and I don't approve that directly supervised by architects; we observe, we don't supervise. So I think that word should be changed. Mr. Hull: Commissioner, I would restrict the comments more towards the historic preservation aspect of it. While I think we can definitely appreciate the professional insight that you can give to the proposal, given the body's role in reviewing and addressing projects, we would ask that you restrict the comments more to the historic preservation. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Well, if that's the case, why submit this to us and ask us to go over it if we're not going to comment on it. Mr. Hull: Well no, it is definitely for you to comment, but within the realms of historic preservation. I mean, there's things like urban planning and engineering technicalities in here. We definitely wouldn't expect this Commission to bring an engineering perspective to it, and while you may have ... like I said, we can appreciate the professional guidance you can lend on it. Given that this is an official body of the County of Kauai reviewing this proposal and the purpose of this body is for historical preservation purposes, there are a fair amount of historical preservation things that can be reviewed on this and that's all I'd ask is that you kind of hold the comments to the historical preservation aspect. Mr. Parker: And I will note that several of the stipulations regarding the HAER documentation came directly from the National Park Service and were inserted verbatim per their review and request, so some of that language could (inaudible). Ms. Schneider: Commissioner Wichman. Ms. Wiclunan: I have a question, please. The question is to Kaaina. Does this Commission have a precedent for signing MOAs? Have we done that before? Or is this something new? Mr. Hull: To tell you the truth, I'm not that familiar with it. I would actually look back at the applicants (inaudible). Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Your mic. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 17 Mr. Hull: Sorry. I, personally, have never presided over a Commission while it's done this. Now, I'm going to look at the applicants, actually, to see how often they've come to various Historic Preservation Commissions or something similar to get a concurrence with an MOA. Mr. Parker: It doesn't happen that frequently. I actually have never had a Commission sign an MOA as well. (Laughter in background) So we're both in uncharted territory to some extent, but I understand your role (inaudible). Ms. Schneider: So we might to research this first? Mr. Will: And again, it's a courtesy, right? Mr. Hull: The Commission can ... just in an action, can concur with the MOA. As far as actually signing off on it, yeah, that ... we might have to have a legal... Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Yeah, I mean ... well, I'm just going back to the powers of this Commission and one of it is to advise and assist the Federal agencies in carrying out your duties under ... to preserve historic preservation, but whether that is an actual sign -off on an MOA or being a concurring party, I mean, I think I would advise the Commission that, you know, they can provide you some guidance and some suggestions on your project, but I would hesitate to go ... to ordain signing off on an MOA. Mr. Parker: Understood. It's a non -binding signature, obviously, because there's no stipulations within the MOA that have direct action other than advising by the Commission. There are no actions within it that require you to own a portion of that other than advising on the interpretation, etc. of that. And as such, the MOA was executed the moment Federal Highways and State Historic Preservation Division signed as signatories to the MOA. Concurring party is a different classification of signature on the MOA. Ms. Wiclunan: May I? So I saw that Historic Hawaii Foundation has signed on the MOA as well. Mr. Parker: As a concurring party as well. Ms. Wichman: As a concurring party. Mr. Parker: Correct. And that is so that they can provide guidance and assistance in the interpretation as well. Ms. Wichman: Oh I see. Okay. Thank you. Ms. Schneider: So Jodi, what is...? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: I can review the document. I just didn't have time to closely look at it. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 18 Ms. Schneider: I think we'll have to let our attorney review it before we take any action. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Yes. Mr. Parker: Of course. Ms. Schneider: Thank you. Anything else? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: You could even take a short recess and I can take a look at it now if you wanted to. Ms. Schneider: Sure. Do you want to take a 5-minute recess? Ms. Higuchi hi Sayegusa: Unless Kaaina had something else. Mr. Hull: No. You think you'll be able to determine in the next five (5) minutes? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: I haven't fully closely read it. Mr. Hull: One opportunity is —because they also have another presentation from the General Plan. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Okay. Mr. Parker: And if the Commission needs snore time, obviously, this isn't the last time that we can discuss this with you. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Yeah. Mr. Parker. We're not unreasonable folks. (Laughter in background) Ms. Nakea: Can I just kind of sum up for myself to make sure I'm understanding what's going on? Ms. Schneider: Go ahead. Ms. Nakea: Your purpose of the visit was to see if we would like to be concurring signatories on the MOA. Mr. Parker: Correct. Ms. Nakea: The bridge, as designed as you showed us, is going forward ... is moving forward. Mr. Parker: Correct. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 19 Ms. Nakea: Okay. And now we're trying to figure out whether or not we can actually be those concurring ... a concurring member on the letter? Mr. Parker: Yes. Ms. Nakea: Okay. I understand. Mr. Hull: And Commissioner, historically, something like this, the Commission would just issue a memorandum of saying agreement or approval; however, these concerns... look at this. So generally, we would just ... this body would just issue a memorandum to that effect. So taking it a bit further to actually signing off as a concurring party is what they're requesting in this situation. Ms. Schneider: Like I said, we'd have to let our attorney research it first before we can take any action on it. Myles? Staff Planner Myles Hironaka: Hi. Myles for the record. So if the Commission were to be a ... I guess a concurring or a signatory party to this, what would their obligations be? Mr. Parker: It would be participation in concurring party and signatory meetings to discuss execution of the stipulation. So obviously, HAER documentation is not a stipulation that you'd have to participate in, but interpretation material concepts and layouts, etc., interim design reviews because obviously, interpretation sites and plans can take many shapes, they could be placards and the layout, etc. of those. Ms. Schneider: So it would be beneficial for us (inaudible). Ms. HiQuchi Save usa: Well... Mr. Hull: And how would you anticipate this body being a participant in those discussions? Would, essentially, it have to send a representative? Or would, say, you folks come to this Commission during those discussions to have it with the full body? Mr. Parker: I think it would be coming to the Commission while also including representation from SHPD, HHF, etc. to make sure all signatories and concurring parties on the memorandum can discuss those materials. Ms. Schneider: Commissioners, is anybody... Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Well, just as an overarching caution that's why, we have to conduct meetings pursuant to Chapter 92, HRS Sunshine Law, so we need to have meetings agendaed, notice... publicly noticed, and quorum, and discuss and vote on certain things as a body. So, I mean, that's one of the concerns, but, you know, without having reviewed the MOA and exactly what it's obligating the Commission, I mean, I can't speak to that. But as you describe it, yeah, I mean, it would ... you would have to come here and discuss it with the body. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 20 Mr. Hull: So I guess the next question, Jodi, is would you need, like, the next thirty (30) minutes? Or would you need a few more days? (Laughter in background) Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Ideally ... I mean, yeah, couple days would be ideal for me. Mr. Parker: Understood. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: And more thorough. Mr. Parker: And there's no obligation to sign, obviously. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Okay. Ms. Schneider: Well, thank you for your presentation. Mr. Parker: There is no obligation. And like I said, the moment SHPD and Federal Highways signed, the MOA became active because of the two (2) primary signatories. Ms. Schneider: But if we want to be a party to it... Mr. Parker: Yes. Mr. Hull: For all intents and purposes, Commission, it sounds like they want to include you more in the discussion, which you could look at after Jodi reviews the form and legality of the document. But from what it sounds like, they want to include you more in the process. Ms. Schneider: Sounds good. So I hope you'll come back to us ... or we'll get back to you. Mr. Parker: You can twist my arm to come back. (Laughter in background) Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: But for the purposes ... I mean, if I'm able to take a look at it and it's, perhaps, maybe deferred to the next meeting, I mean, how would that affect your timeline? Mr. Parker: Well, I guess ... you all meet every 4t1i Thursday, I believe. Ms. Schneider: The next meeting is November 17"i. Mr. Parker: November 17t1i. Ms. Schneider: If you could come back at that meeting, hopefully Jodi will have an answer and we'll be able to take some action. Mr. Will: To give you an idea, I think that the commitment in the MOA is for us to have this plan constructed and completed prior to the end of construction. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 21 Mr. Parker: Correct. Mr. Will: Of the permanent bridge. So that's the commitment. How we get there... Mr. Parker: With an 18-imonth... yeah, with an 18-month anticipated schedule, there's obviously time for development of interpretation materials throughout the life of that period of the project. Mr. Hull: And as I understand it, because this is put on hold for the Commission, this doesn't ... you guys are still moving forward on your process. Mr. Parker: Correct. (Inaudible) Mr. Hull: So, essentially, the longer we take is just the less time this body can potentially participate in the process, right? Yeah. Ms. Schneider: Well, thank you very much. Mr. Will: Thank you. Mr. Parker: Thank you. Ms. Wichinan: Do we need to make a motion to defer? Mr. Hull: Yeah, so a motion ... if that is the intent of this body, a motion for deferral would be necessary. Ms. Schneider: Can I get a motion? Ms. Wichman: 1 move that we defer the discussion of the MOA with Federal Highways until our next meeting in November. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Second. Ms. Schneider: All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Anybody opposed? No? Motion passes 6:0. Mr. Hull: Thanks you guys. Ms. Schneider: So we'll see you on the 17th, I think it is. Re: Presentation by the Planning Department Regarding Overview of the General Plan Process and Schedule Moving Forward, and a Review of the Draft Heritage Resources Map. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 22 Mr. Hull: The next agenda item is presentation by the Planning Department regarding overview of the General Plan process and schedule moving forward, and a review of -the Draft Heritage Resource Map. And the Planner just stepped out of the room. Ms. Schneider: We'll take a 5-minute recess and hopefully she'll return. 5-minute recess. The Commission recessed this portion of the meeting at 3:55 p.m. The Commission reconvened this portion of the meeting at 3:58 p.m. Ms. Schneider: Call the meeting back to order. Mr. Hull: Again, sorry, as previously stated, we are now on Agenda Item H.3., presentation by the Planning Department regarding overview of the General Plan process and schedule moving forward, and review of the Draft Heritage Resources Map. Leanora is our planner today. Staff Plainer Leanora Kaiaokamalie: Lea Kaiaokamalie for the record. Thank you, Commissioners, for having me here this afternoon. I have a 20-slide presentation — hopeftilly I can move through it pretty quickly — of the Kauai General Plan. I'm just wondering how many of you were involved in the last General Plan Update; that one was done in the year 2000. Yay. Okay, one (1) person. (Laughter in background) That's good, that's good. Ms. Kaiaokamalie presented a PowerPoint Presentation on the Kauai General Plan and the Draft Heritage Resources Map for the record (on file with the Planning Department). Ms. Kaiaokamalie distributed the General Plan Update — Draft Policies document and the Heritage Resources — Draft Actions document to the Commission (on file with the Planning Department). Ms. Schneider: That's something we're working on right now. Ms. Kaiaokamalie continued with her PowerPoint Presentation. Ms. Schneider: Can you partner with outside (inaudible)? Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Yes, that it could say something like that because then you can turn back and say this is something that the General Plan is directing us to do. Ms. Kaiaokamalie continued with her PowerPoint Presentation. Mr. Hull: Lea, correct me if I'm wrong, but also in the Heritage Resources Map, it does identify the National and State Registry process. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Yes. In fact, I'm getting there. Mr. Hull: Oh okay. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 23 Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Perfect. That is perfect. Ms. Kaiaokarnalie continued with her PowerPoint Presentation. Administrator Furfaro left the meeting at 4:22 pan. Ms. Scluleider: Thank you. Commissioners, any questions? Mr. Hull: So it was a lot of inforination, Commissioners. Ultimately, at the end of the day, the General Plan, as Lea was discussing, is the document of documents. It guides everything from Engineering Divisions to Historic Preservation Divisions to, even, capital improvements to regulations. It is the guiding document Of the island. And all the various State, County, Federal agencies, as well as non -profits and property owners look at this document as we move forward. So Lea is just here to see if you guys have any initial comments you want to give to the document as far as inclusion of, say, certain types of policy recommendations... Ms. Schneider: I think you guys have done a great job. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Thank you. Mr. Hull: The — I think she talked about it earlier — the first rough draft ... the first preliminary draft will be coming public in about two (2) weeks, and that's when I would imagine everybody's... that's when, really, people are going to start swarming as they begin to try and red line it and look at edits that they want made, and I think the Commission will definitely have a stab at it then as well. But before we get to that ... before we even release it, we just wanted to kind of run it by you folks to see if there's anything on the onset at the very beginning that you wanted to, as a body, include, potentially, in that document. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Or questions. Ms. Schneider: I think we should give a handout for historic preservation that... Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Okay. Mr. Hull: Oh yeah, on a separate note, while we're doing the General Plan outreach in various places, what Lea is alluding to is the fact that the Open Space Commission has asked if they could tag along; not just only to participate in the community meetings, but as well as to have a table there to let the public know what the Open Space Commission is. So I believe the Commission Chair or somebody from the Commission will be there to represent the Open Space and what it does. So kind of what Marisa and Lea have decided is to say well, we should also make that offer to KHPRC to see if anybody from the Commission would like to participate in the General Plan process, but also, if interested, to just serve as a liaison or cheerleader for preservation. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Talk story with people. October27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 24 _ Ms. Schneider: Commissioners? Mr. Hull: So that's one side, and the other side is the General Plan itself and whether you guys have comments. Ms. Schneider: Any Commissioners ... Stephen. Mr. Long: I would be interested in doing that at one of the public meetings. I mean, I'm north shore so... Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Okay. Mr. Long: Kilauea. Ms. Schneider: Kilauea. Me too. Mr. Long: But we should ... I feel that we should have a presence at all of those public meetings. Ms. Schneider: If possible. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Absolutely. You're very welcome to come. Ms. Nakea: I would be willing to help, too, in Kapa`a or Uhu`e. Ms. Wichman: Yeah, I'd be willing to help, too. Mr. Long: Okay. Ms. Schneider: So just email us. Ms. Nakea: But I'd be terribly nervous to do it by myself. (Laughter in background) Ms. Wichman: We can team up. Ms. Nakea: Okay. (Laughter in background) Ms. Kaiaokamalie: It should be very lively. We are definitely being very ... our policies are bold and how that translates into recommended land use changes is probably going to be very interesting (laughter) to take up discussion with our community. Ms. Schneider: Stephen. Mr. Long: Did we fill the slots for all of those public meetings? Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Do I work with Staff? October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 25 Mr. Long: What was solicited? Ms. Schneider: Kilauea, Lihu`e. Mr. Hull: We can have ... Shan or myself can shoot an email to you folks to see. Yeah, to let you know the exact dates and the times. Ms. Scluieider: That would be great. Mr. Long: And we'll sign up, and who wants to be there, and we'll cover it. Ms. Schneider: Yeah. Mr. Long: Thank you. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Thank you. Ms. Scluieider: Thank you. Mr. Hull: So — I just want to make sure — so concerning the actual General Plan itself, did you folks have any comments at this time that you wanted to create? Or ... because what you have before you folks right now, what Lea handed out, was the draft actions, so those are various things that are currently within the draft plan. You guys are getting a sneak peek at it because nobody else has really seen it. Nobody has seen the full document itself, but this is just a portion of the preservation side that's being included, so if you folks had any issues with these particular recommendations and/or did you have any specific additional things you folks might want to see in there right now. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Yeah, and of course I alluded to some of the ideas that I had for you folks based on the CAMP workshop, but it's up to you. Ms. Schneider: Well, we'd like to see the inventory reflected in this for sure. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: And if there's any way to make the actions stronger — the language on it — I think that that's where we, internally, struggle with ... you know, we have what we think it should be, but you guys are working on it. Ms. Schneider: Stephen. Mr. Long: I know that historic preservation's covered with its own section and yet, I think that past comment about having historic preservation as part of, you know, the 1 through 21 items could be a good thing. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Is that something you want Staff to work on? Or is that something you guys would like to provide language for? I guess that was my question. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 26 Mr. Long: Oh, I'm sorry. Personally, I think you're doing a great job (inaudible). Ms. Schneider: Yeah, I think it's more in your realm to provide the language than for us. Ms. Nakea: I appreciated how you highlighted everything that was... pertained to the historic preservation and that you pulled things from CAMP. The language really does carry over, yeah? Not only to historic preservation. Ms. Schneider: And thank you for coming to the CAMP training. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Oh, no, that was really good. Keeping a rural lifestyle is one of the biggest policies that we have here, and that is so much in line with what was being talked about during the training and I was like ho, well, this is just perfect. (Laughter) There's so many places that we can definitely meld and it doesn't have to be, you know, a double effort on the part of the Planning Department and the Commission itself to get things done because it kind of works together with some of the things we're already looking to do anyway. Mr. Hull: Other than that ... oh. Ms. Schneider: Stephen. Mr. Long: I'rm just looking here. Item No. 7, Build a Balanced Transportation System, and you have a little blurb about that. It might include something about historic nature of some of our transportation systems, like, the north shore (inaudible). Ms. Schneider: Bring back the train. (Laughter) Mr. Long: (Inaudible) National Heritage Road. So, you know, we're just trying to plug in historic preservation wherever we can. Ms. Kaiaokammalie: We ... comments are not, you know, due until, like, the 2nd of December. don't know if you guys want to take some time with it and then bring it back to... Ms. Schneider: Yes. Mr. Hull: Yeah, and in fact, I think ... that's exactly what I was going to recommend is that you guys are just getting this now. It's a little hard to say, like... Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Yeah, I was not expecting... Mr. Hull: Do you have any policy changes for the island of Kauai for the next twenty (20) years? Ms. Kaiaokamalie: No. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 27 Mr. Hull: Give it to us now. (Laughter) So I think if you guys want to sit with this document, let it digest, we can put it on the November 17t1i agenda, as well as ... or the December agenda. I think we can work with both Lea and the Chair to figure out when it would be most appropriate. And then you guys can possibly come back with more comments, and if... Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Comunents in the form of specific language is always welcomed. (Laughter) Kind of at our wits end coining up with, you know, exciting generalities. (Laughter) Ms. Wichman: True. And then during the public meetings, we might hear other things as well. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Yes. Ms. Schneider: Yeah, I'm sure we will. Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Yes, so it should be lively. (Laughter) Ms. Schneider: Cone to the north shore. You'll hear ... (laughter) Ms. Kaiaokamalie: Thank you. Ms. Schneider: Thank you. Ms. Wichman: Thank you very much. Mr. Hull: Technically, you need a motion to defer or... Ms. Schneider: Commissioners, do we have a motion to defer? Ms. Wichman: I move that we defer providing comment for the Kauai Kakou General Plan Update until our next meeting. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Second. Ms. Schneider: All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Any discussion? No. Motion carries 6:0. Mr. Hull: No discussion needed (inaudible). Re: Honolulu, Ltd TMK: 3-8-04:14 4479 Rice Street, Lihu`e, Kauai Proposed New Roof for Existing Restaurant Building October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 28 Mr. Hull: So the.:.I think to go back to the tabled item for that agenda is Agenda Item H, New Business. Honolulu, Ltd.; TMK: 3-8-004:14; 4479 Rice Street, Uhu`e, Kauai; proposed new roof for existing restaurant building. So we have been infonned that the representative did not actually intend to appear before the KHPRC. He just submitted the letter, pictures, and renderings for your review. Ms. Schneider: And based on the pictures, we... Mr. Hull: Oh, and — excuse me — and then also what was placed at your seats prior to the meeting is the Kauai Historic Resource Profile for this historic structure. Ms. Schneider: So does ... we feel that the metal roof is not in keeping (inaudible)? Mr. Hull: Yeah, go ahead, Chair. (Laughter) Ms. Schneider: The proposed metal roof is certainly not the original material that they're saying they are going to reroof with. We would rather see the original material, which is the shake. Mr. Long: What was the original material? Ms. Schneider: We think it was the shake. Mr. Hull: The earliest picture we can find, at this point, in the 1960's shows the wooden shingles. Mr. Long: Shingles or shakes? Ms. Schneider: Not really sure. Mr. Hull: Sorry. Shakes. Mr. Long: Okay. Mr. Hull: And so, this roof has, of course, been altered. It has composite shakes and what they're proposing is a metal roof now. Ms. Schneider: Which is a completely different change of material. Yes, Stephen. Mr. Long: Well, the existing roof with the existing cedar shakes has been modified somewhat with the Hardie plank... Ms. Schneider: Right. Mr. Long: Top as a repair and maintenance quick -fix issue. So the fact is is that most of the building still has the original roof on it; original -type roof, if not the original roof if this was built in... when? October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 29 Mr. Hull: 1943. Mr. Long: 1943. Because cedar shake roofs last a long time. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a recommendation or a motion? Stephen. Mr. Long: As I'm looking at it, I think that the materials, specifically cedar shake roofing material, is a distinctive design feature of the original building that a substantial part of maybe even that original roof still exists with a minor repair with the Hardie shake. So on a historical basis and aesthetic basis, I personally would like to see theirs replace the roof as it was installed originally with cedar shake. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Ms. Nakea: I second. Ms. Schneider: All in favor? Ms. Nakea: Well, I had to think about how this works, about the order, because there's still a discussion that can happen. Mr. Hull: Yeah, after the second, there's a discussion. Ms. Nakea: (Inaudible) not going to be discussed if there's... okay. Ms. Schneider: Any discussion? Because if they change it... Ms. Nakea: I wish I had the Interior Standards in front of me right now, but it does say something about using original materials if possible. Ms. Schneider: Yes, I have it right in front of me. A property will be used as historically or given a new use that requires minimal change to the distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spacial relationships. Ms. Nakea: Okay. Thank you. So then it makes sense that that's what we should recommend as ... because that's our job. Ms. Schneider: Yes. From the restoration will be retained and preserved. The removal of materials or alteration of featured spaces and spacial characterized the period will not be undertaken. So in keeping with the original material, that's in line with... Mr. Hull: I'll say that, traditionally, this Commission has generated... when a recommendation or proposal is adopted, it's automatically submitted to the applicant as the action of this Commission. I would actually, in this situation and as we begin to progress as a Commission, but in this situation, I'd actually request that you snake a concerted effort to have this not only submitted to the October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 30 applicant, but submitted as recommendation to the Planning Department because ultimately, the Planning Department will be reviewing the pen -nit for this and our action on this, we can use your comments, in effect, as we go through the pennitting actions. Ms. Schneider: So what should we do at this point? Mr. Hull: Well, I would just recommend that, if you guys are adopting that language, that it both be not only issued to the applicant, but also issued to the Planning Department. Ms. Schneider: Sounds good. Ms. Nakea: In the motion that we make, or...? Mr. Hull: A motion was made. Ms. Nakea: Okay, okay. Ms. Schneider: And seconded. Mr. Hull: And seconded. Ms. Schneider: So now ... did we vote on it? Mr. Hull: So, Jodi, how would that...? Ms. Higuchi Sayepusa: You could modify, but I would ... maybe for clarity sake, maybe you could retract your second, retract your motion, and then make a new motion. Mr. Long: Okay. First of all, I should retract that last statement. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: I'm sorry, so... Mr. Long: Now, I would like to make a motion. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Oh, wait. Sorry. Ms. Nakea: I retract my second. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Okay. And then... Ms. Schneider: Make your new motion. Mr. Long: Thank you. I would like to make a motion that in considering the applicant's proposal, that the original cedar shake type roof that was used on the original constructed structure and which October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 31 may also still be substantially in place be the roofing material which is used to reroof this historical structure, and that this recommendation be given to both the Planning Commission and... Mr. Hull: Planning Department. Ms. Scluieider: Planning Department. Mr. Long: The Planning Department. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Ms. Nakea: I second. Ms. Schneider: All in favor? Oh, any discussion? Ms. Higuchi Save usa: Further discussion, yeah. Ms. Schneider: Any discussion? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Yes. Are we setting ourselves up for some legal action if the roof catches fire, they can blame it onto us? Ms. Schneider: I couldn't make that detennination. (Laughter) Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: I mean, they can always make ... we get sued all the time. (Laughter in background) But whether it's a prevailing claim, I mean, there's a lot of assumptions in that. (Laughter) It'll probably be a negligence action, but, you know, I can't analyze exactly. It's factual circumstance. And it is also just a recommendation by you folks. Ms. Schneider: Yes. We are only advisory. They can probably go do whatever they want. Mr. Hull: Yeah, the Commission is advisory, and that's why I asked that the motion be made to both the applicant, as well as to the Planning Department because as we move forward, and we've talked about before, there hasn't been much teeth in the actions of this body when it hears applications because those recommendations are ultimately made and the applicant is able to kind of nod and agree, or disagree if he or she wants to and move on. As we move forward, in looking at trying to further implement historic preservation, the Department — and that's why some of the officialdom has been created for this body — the Department is looking at and intends to implement you folks' actions and take your recommendations and seriously look at imposing them as conditions of approval during zoning permit review. So this is a particular structure where we would look at putting, say, a condition of that type onto their approval. So ultimately, if they do have to change it, it's because the Planning Department says so. Ms. Schneider: So all in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Anybody opposed? (None) October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 32 Mr. Hull: I don't know if you wanted to check if there's a little bit more discussion. (Laughter) Ms. Schneider: Is there any more discussion? Nope. All in favor? (5 ayes) Nobody opposed? Passes. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I oppose. Ms. Schneider: Oh, Larry opposes. It still passes, right? Mr. Long: Okay. What does that do? Mr. Hull: Yeah. Ms. Schneider: Yeah, still passes. Motion carries 5:1. KAUAI HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY UPDATE COMMITTEE Re: Report from investigative committee (Permitted Interaction Group) to discuss and explore draft update of the Kauai Historic Resource Inventory. Mr. Hull: Okay. The next agenda item is the ... Agenda Item J, Kaua`i Historic Resource Inventory Update Committee. A report from investigative committee, a Permitted Interaction Group, to discuss and explore draft update of the Kauai Historic Resource Inventory. Ms. Schneider: Stephen. Mr. Long: I have an update on that interaction group's activities. And once again, with the support of Myles and the extent of the documentation and photographs and charts and snaps that he brought with us, it made our job efficient and professional, so thank you, Myles. Ms. Schneider: Yes. Mr. Long: What I have to report is that of the 500 historic structures that were identified by the consultant, we've reviewed 341 of those; both on slides, on Google, and in the car going around the neighborhoods and site visits. Of the 341 that we've looked at, we have a net loss of 80 being removed from the survey. So we have a remaining of 160 properties to review; both in the meeting room and then out in the field, which we should have done, hopefully, by the very first of the year. Ms. Schneider: Thank you, Stephen. And thank you, members of this group. Mr. Hull: So I think you'd need a motion to receive that report. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a motion to receive the report? October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 33 Mr. Chaffin Jr.: I'll make that motion to receive the report. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Ms. Nakea: I second. Ms. Scluleider: Any discussion? All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Motion passes 6:0. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PUBLICITY COMMITTEE Re: Update on the permitted interaction group (PIG) for publicizing historic preservation efforts. Mr. Hull: The next agenda item is Agenda Item K, Historic Preservation Publicity Committee. Update on the Pennitted Interaction Group for publicizing historic preservation efforts. I believe this was specifically requested to be placed on the agenda by Commissioner Griffin. So ultimately, I would recommend deferring at least in respect to her to be able to have her chime in when she returns, but if you guys have any discussion for it before then. Ms. Schneider: Do we need a motion to defer? Mr. Hull: Ultimately, you need a motion to defer. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a motion? Mr. Hull: I would check to see if you have discussion first. (Laughter) Ms. Schneider: Any discussion on this item that... publicizing? Mr. Hull: Oh, correct. I stand corrected. (Laughter) Before the deferral happens, I'll also notify you guys. I believe Shan sent you the email of the ... Sarah Blane helped the Department and the Commission draft an article for The Garden Island Newspaper celebrating thirty (30) years of the Kauai Historic Preservation Commission's establishment and fifty (50) years of the Historic Preservation Act. So you guys got that email. It was a nice piece that Sarah did. Ms. Schneider: Right. And it was in the newspaper. Mr. Hull: Did it get picked up? Ms. Schneider: Yes, it was in the newspaper. Mr. Hull: It did get picked up. I didn't even see the newspaper. So thank you guys for that. That was initiated here for ... you folks had instructed the Department to go ahead and do that October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 34 publication, so that was the ... thanks to you folks. (Laughter) Okay, so I think you're looking for a motion to defer. Ms. Schneider: So we need a motion to defer. Ms. Wiclunan: I move that we defer Item K. L, the update on the Pennitted Interaction Group for publicizing historic preservation efforts, until our last meeting or until Pat Griffin returns. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a second? Ms. Nakea: I second. Ms. Scluzeider: Any discussion? All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Motion carries 6:0. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Re: Proposed draft Rules of Practice and Procedure of the County of Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission. Mr. Hull: Okay. Next agenda item going back to the moved Agenda Item G, Unfinished Business. G. I., proposed draft Rules of Practice and Procedure of the County of Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission. So the Commission is in receipt of the draft parliamentary rules that the Department submitted over. Both Jodi, myself, and Chance Bukoski of our staff worked on these draft rules. So all commissions in the County of Kauai generally have administrative rules on how they ... the procedures are rolled out on how practices are. This is the one commission that doesn't. So we went to the official capacity of drafting these rules for you folks. They are strictly parliamentarian procedures. Absent these parliamentarian procedures, we've been relying on a de facto set of rules under the Robert Rules of Parliamentary Procedures. So we are officially submitting these to you folks for your review for, hopefully, ultimate adoption so that you have these rules in place. If there's any discussion, we can definitely discuss them today. It's more or less being submitted to you folks for your review because ultimately, Jodi and myself, should you want to move on a set of rules, whether it's these or an amended version, have to take them to this Small Business Regulatory Review Board on Oahu. It's a requirement of Hawaii Revised Statutes that any administrative rules first be reviewed by that entity, and then we can bring it back to you folks for official public hearing. But before we bring it to them, we would like you guys to hopefully work on it so that you're all kind of on the right track of where it wants to go. Mr. Long: My only thought is — and I brought it up before — is now the time to take a look at the number of commissioners on the Commission because we have more commissioners than other commissions and we sometimes have a difficulty snaking quorum. Mr. Hull: I think we can work with Staff on that, but that's not a function of the rules. Unfortunately, or fortunately, it's actually a consequence of the ordinance itself, so we'd have to actually propose an ordinance change that was reviewed and ultimately acted on by County October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 35 Council. I think that issue is definitely one of merit, Stephen, so I think we can look into that because there have been several meetings where we just can't make quorum. So we would want to work with Jay's office, but I'll follow up on that. Mr. Long: Yeah, and while we're going through it, you know, creating humbug, administrative humbug, there's the name — Kaua`i Historic Preservation Review Commission — which might have one more word in it than it might need. So if we're going to do this, maybe it's the time we take a look at both sides of it; the rules, which I don't have any comment about, and other issues. Mr. Hull: Okay. I think we can look at ... because if we did send something up to the County Council, it would be reviewed by you folks first and would have to ultimately take your approval. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: There is a typo on 1-2-23; several pages into it. Computation of Time. In the third line, it says "...that act, event, or default, and includes the last say of the period..." It should be "day". Mr. Hull: Sorry. Excuse me, Commissioner, where was the typo? Mr. Chaffin Jr.: 1-2-23, third line down in the middle. "...that act, even, or default, and includes the last say of the period..." Mr. Hull: Okay. (Laughter) We'll definitely work on that. Thank you. Ms. Scluleider: Anything else? Ms. Wichman: I have a question. Just something that I'm not sure about. What does it mean when rules are silent? It says, "For good cause, the Commission may vote to suspend the rules." I'm not quite sure what that means. Mr. Hull: What section are you looking at? Ms. Wichman: 1-2-27. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: So, I mean, if there's a situation where the rules don't technically govern or direct how to engage in ... or how to go forward, then the Chair can suspend the rules and just sort of attempt to do it beyond the rules. (Laughter) Mr. Hull: It is essentially where, procedurally, if something arises that is not specifically covered by the rules, and it's real rare of course because these things are fairly thorough. But in the case of some parliamentary proceedings — I know it's happened on the Planning Commission a few times — where the rules don't explicitly say what to do in a particular situation and therefore, the Chair can just suspend the rules, so that they can proceed forward as the Chair essentially sees fit. Ms. Schneider: There's no executive session? October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 36 Mr. Hull: No, an executive session is a different issue. Ms. Schneider: Yeah. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: And also, the rules do specify the role that the Chair plays in which the Chair has discretion on how to conduct the meeting and go forward. Mr. Hull: Because technically, right now, you folks are operating, essentially, under silent rule right now. There is no rule, period. So you've essentially... Ms. Schneider: Robert's Rules of Order. Mr. Hull: Yeah. Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: The default rules are the Robert's Rules, so I mean, technically, right now we're engaging the meeting under Robert's Rules. And procedurally for the rules, we do have to go to the Small Business Regulatory Review Commission [sic] for their review on the rules' effect on small businesses in general and then we'd have to do a forinal public hearing, which will be noticed thirty (30) days prior to a meeting. And then at that meeting we could ... you folks could choose to adopt the rules or amend them, etc. but... Ms. Schneider: And the public hearing is in this agency? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: It would be conducted here. Ms. Wichinan: Are there other commissions that are doing the general provisions as well? Or are we the only one that doesn't have one of these? Ms. Higuchi Sayegusa: Have rules? We ... Kaaina and I went through and did a recent amendment to the Open Space rules, but this is... Mr. Hull: I believe you folks are the only to not have a set of administrative rules. Open Space has had some for several years now. We just went in and had to tweak it because some of the parameters in which they operated wasn't working, so we (inaudible) clear the way for them. So I guess it would be up to you folks if you want to defer it to ... for you folks to digest it and come back at a later meeting with, perhaps, insight. Ms. Schneider: I think we need a motion to defer it, so that we have a chance to read them over well (inaudible). Mr. Long: I have a comment. Mr. Hull: Yeah. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 37 Mr. Long: Discussion. I believe we've deferred this already once; the rules. Mr. Hull: No, this is the first time you guys have them. Mr. Long: Okay. Mr. Hull: Yeah-. Ms. Schneider: Do we have a motion? Ms. Nakea: I move that we defer Item G.1. of instituting the new rules for our Commission to a later date ... the next meeting ... to the next meeting. Ms. Schneider: Second? Ms. Wichman: Second. Ms. Schneider: Any discussion? All in favor? (Unanimous voice vote) Motion passes 6:0. Re: Discussion on the status of the Certified Local Government. Mr. Hull: The last agenda item is G.2. Discussion on the status of the Certified Local Government. Of course the SHPD Staff isn't here to discuss that with you folks. They are still traveling around the State, or resting from all the travel around the State. I did speak with Anna yesterday. The two (2) applications we had for CLG funds ... one (1) has not been submitted to theirs yet; that's concerning the repository. And there was just a question as to whether or not the Commission, which is essentially attached to the hip to the Planning Department, can apply for funds that will then be given to a different agency, the Parks Division, to administer those funds. So Anna is checking to see if there can be a third party agreement established in which the Department would take that money, hand it over to the Parks Department, and that third party agreement would be established. So that's just why that's still stuck in limbo, so she's checking on that now. The second application for CLG monies for the Hanapepe Bridge was submitted to SHPD. They did deem it complete and acceptable, so it has been forwarded on to the... Ms. Schneider: Oh, great. Mr. Hull: Well it has been forwarded on to the National Park Service, so we haven't been awarded it yet, but it was deemed complete and acceptable. Ms. Schneider: Does the State have the CLG money? Mr. Long: That's a big deal. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 38 Mr. Hull: No, they don't have ... they have not been awarded the CLG money. So ultimately, the National Park Service has to detennine whether or not they are going to approve the application, but it was deemed complete and ready to review. Ms. Schneider: That's a step in the right direction. Mr. Hull: So it's a step in the right direction, but it does not mean the monies are... Mr. Chaffin Jr.: A baby step. Mr. Hull: Yes. (Laughter in background) Mr. Long: And who prepared that application? Mr. Hull: Myles and myself. Mr. Long: Excellent. Thank you. Ms. Schneider: Thank you very much. Ms. Wichman: Yeah, thank you. Ms. Schneider: I'm sure the people of Hanapepe really appreciate it. (Laughter) Mr. Hull: Yeah. We're moving along, so hopefully we'll have good news shortly on that. And then lastly and finally, I will say that we have had the Planner position, the Historic Preservation Planner position, now listed online for several months and we have not had a single applicant. So much of what the Commission can do and so much of what they are talking about in the CAMP is contingent upon having an actual plarmer for this position, so it's something that... especially Anne's been on the Commission, I think, for as long as Larry has been on it, and that this Commission has wrestled with not having an actual staff member has really (inaudible) with the Department to get a staff member assigned. Finally, this year we were able to get the monies for that and put the position out... Ms. Schneider: But we can't get anybody to fill the position. Mr. Hull: But we can't get anybody. It has been listed on the County website, it has gone to various places on the mainland because — I'll be quite frank — I mean, if there is a planner of that level in Hawaii, we would love to see them apply for it, but I am of the suspicion that there may not be, so we're fine with it being advertised even on the mainland, but we still have not had any bites. So this is somewhat of my plea to you folks, if you folks know anybody because I'll be quite honest, of... Ms. Schneider: What are the qualifications? What are they asking for? October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 39 Mr. Hull: There has to be four (4) years of experience in planning. There has to be years of experience within the preservation field. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: Education requirements? Mr. Hull: There is...there was a college degree level. There is a college degree level of...it can be architectural, it can be planner, it can be preservation -oriented. Ms. Scluieider: But they need the five (5) years' experience. Mr. Hull: Four (4)... they need the four (4) years' experience. It's at a higher pay ratio as well. Ms. Wichman: So is it a BA? Or a MA? Mr. Hull: What is the salary (inaudible)? Ms. Schneider: I think it was ... it was good with the salary. Mr. Hironaka: The person would have to meet the minimum qualifications of having professional planning work of at least four (4) years of experience, and some of that can be covered through education like having a Master's in Planning may cover for so many years of experience, but then there would actually be a minimum of at least two (2) years of work with historic preservation, so of that four (4), two (2) years must be involving historic preservation. Now, what Kaaina was saying, we've posted this advertisement for several months now; well, actually I would say ... I think around July is when we started. We were successful though. It was an entry level position, a Planner IV, but we were able to convince the Human Resources to allow us to hire at a higher range at a higher series in order to attract. Ms. Schneider: How much is the salary? Mr. Hironaka: About $60,000 is what we have for Planner IV. Mr. Hull: Planner IV. So four (4) years' experience is at about $60,000 salary. Mr. Hironaka: That's the highest range that we could go. Mr. Hull: And so the reason I bring it up... Ms. Schneider: Just in case anybody knows anybody. Mr. Hull: One, it is kind of a last, desperate plea. If you folks know anybody... we've been pleading with people at SHPD if they know anybody, sending it to people, you know? If you know anybody, because I got to be quite honest folks, it can last only maybe a month or two more up there. After that, the position more than likely will be lost. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 40 Mr. Long: First of the year? Mr. Hull: Yeah, it has to get looked at being readjusted, and that's why I just want to be honest with you guys. We fought hard to get it for you guys and we fought even harder with HR to get that salary higher, but it's still not enough to attract anybody at this point, so if you know anybody, or just even a whim of somebody... Ms. Schneider: Stephen. Mr. Long: In addition to people that we might know, can we suggest that you expand your advertising? Mr. Hull: We have. It's not just ... we've put it on National websites, National that would deal both with the planning and preservation industries. Mr. Chaffin Jr.: How about the schools? Mr. Long: Yes, that's what I was going to say. What about universities on the west coast? Ms. Schneider: Yeah, but you get somebody who's just graduating. (Laughter) Mr. Long: Well, no, you get somebody with a Master's and that's two (2) years, and then they worked here and there for a couple of years and they qualify that, so they're younger (inaudible). Mr. Hull: We can definitely look into it further, yeah. Mr. Long: That would be my recommendation; would be to also market the planning departments on all of the west coast schools from Nevada west, and send theirs to the department heads and let them know. Because what we're really looking ... it's a great opportunity for somebody with four (4) years of experience right out of college to make $50,000 on Kauai if we can (inaudible). Mr. Hull: 60, 60. Ms. Schneider: 60. Mr. Long: 60? Mr. Hull: 60. Mr. Long: Oh. Ms. Wichman: I might apply. (Laughter in background) Ms. Schneider: Go ahead, Victoria. You'd be perfect. October 27, 2016 KHPRC Meeting Minutes Page 41 Ms. Wiclunan: Also, UH at Manoa, they have the urban planning. Mr. Hull: Yeah, and we even have a staff member currently getting her Master's at that (inaudible), so she's had (inaudible) out there as well. Mr. Long: Thank you. Ms. Schneider: Thank you. Mr. Hull: Yeah, thanks. DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS (November 17, 2016) Mr. Hull: So the next agenda... excuse me. The next date of the Commission, because of the Thanksgiving interruption, will now be November 17, 2016. Ms. Hoomanawanui: 17? Mr. Hull: November 17. Ms. Schneider: Are we adjourned? We're adjourned. See you on the 17`n ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:04 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, eZrcie Agaran Commission Support Clerk Date: 1 m I I b Chapter 1. General Provisions 1-1-1 Purpose. The intent and purpose of the rules of practice and procedure of the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission is to provide a systematic and democratic method of conducting meetings and hearings in order to insure that all persons and. parties will have an opportunity to participate in an open, productive, and orderly manner. 1-1-2 Definitions. As used in these Rules, except as otherwise required by context: (1) "Agency" means the Planning Department of the County of Kauai or its authorized representative. (2) "Commission," "Chairperson" and the "Commissioner" means the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission of the County of Kauai, State of Hawaii, its Chairperson, and a member thereof, respectively. (3) "Director" means the Planting Director of the County of Kauai. (4) "Ex parte communication" means private communication or arguments with members of the commission or its hearing officer as to the merits of a proceeding with a view towards influencing the outcome of a proceeding. (5) "HRS" means Hawaii Revised Statutes (6) "Meetings" means the convening of the Commission for which a quorum is required in order to snake a decision or to deliberate toward a decision upon a matter over which the Commission had advisory power. (7) "Person" means when appropriate to the context, not only individuals, but corporations,.firnrs, associations, societies, and federal, state and county departments of agencies. (8) "Presiding Officer" means and shall include any member of the Commission or hearing a hearing officer duly designated as such. Unless otherwise designated, the Chairperson shall be the presiding officer. (9) "Proceeding" means any matter that is brought before the Cornnission in which it has advisory authority. (10) "Public Record" means the same>as defined in Chapter 92, HRS, and shall include maps, rules and regulations, written statements of policy or interpretation formulated, adopted or used by the commission meetings and records of any docket on file with the Commission but shall not include records which invades the right of privacy of an individual. ci's z NOV 17 2016 0 C NT7 2 6' (11) "Rules" means the Rules of Practice and Procedure before the Commission. Chapter II. Organization & Parliamentary Riles 1-2-1 Organization. At the regular September meeting of each year, the Commission shall elect a chairperson and Vice -Chairperson from among its members. They shall serve for a tern of one year or until their successors are duly elected. No member shall succeed himself or herself as chairperson. In the event the Conunission is not able to elect a regular Chairperson or Vice - Chairperson fiom among its members at its first September meeting, the incumbent chair may serve on a hold -over basis for a tern not to exceed -ninety (90) days. 1-2-2 Meetings. (a) Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held every fourth Thursday of the month or on such day as the Commission may designate. The Place of meeting shall be the Lihue Civic Center, or such other place as may be designated by the Commission. (b) Subject to the conditions prescribed by these rules, special -meetings may be called at any time by the chairperson, director, or a majority of the commission, who shall state the subject thereof, and the acts and business of the commission at such special meeting shall be confined to such matters. (c) Each member shall be given oral or written notice at least (5) worlcing days prior to a special meeting, unless waived by such member. (d) The Commission shall prepare and post an agenda for all meetings of the commission and its committee's identifying the date, time, place, and subjects to be considered in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 91 and 92, FIRS. 1-2-3 Ad'ourrunent. Meetings may be adjourned at any time by vote, and unless otherwise specified in the motion, every adjournment shall be deemed to be the next meeting of the Commission. 1-2-4 Quorum and Number of Votes Necessary for a Decision. Unless otherwise provided by law, a majority of all the members to which the Commission is entitled shall constitute a quorum to transact business, and the concurrence of a majority of Commission members present shall be necessary to make a Commission decision valid, failing which there shall have been no valid action talcen. 1-2-5 Continuation of Decision Making. Any matter which fails to be validated by maj ority concurrence of Commission members present may be continued to any subsequent regular meeting. 1-2-6 Effective Date of Commission Decision. Unless a specific effective date is set forth, the effective date of a decision rendered by the Commission shall be the date of the meeting at which such valid decision was made. 1-2-7 Minutes and Transcripts (a) Meetings. In accordance to HRS 92-9, the commission shall keep written minutes of all meetings, Unless otherwise required by law, neither a full transcripts nor a recording of the meeting is required, but the written minutes shall give a true reflection of the matters discussed at the meeting and the views of the members. (b) Copies of Recordings. In cases where copies of prerecorded tapes are requested, a fee $5.00 per hour (rounded off to the nearest half hour) of recording time shall be assessed in addition to the costs of the tapes used (rounded off to the nearest $.50). Charges may be waived or modified when the requesting person provides the recording equipment, tapes, and performs the recording subject to conditions and supervision by the planning department. 1-2-8 Officers and their Duties. (a) Presiding Officer. The Chairperson shall be the presiding officer of the Commission and the Vice -Chairperson shall be the presiding officer in the absence of the chairperson. The presiding officer shall: (1) Open all meeting of the Conunission at the appointed hour by taking the chair and calling the meeting to order; (2) Call for the approval of the minutes of any preceding meetings when a quorum is present; (3) Maintain order and proper decorum; (4) Announce the business before the Commission in the order prescribed by the rules; (5) Review all matters properly brought before the Commission, call for votes upon the same and announce the results; (6) Appoint all committees unless otherwise ordered by the Commission; (7) Authenticate by signature all acts of the Commission as may be required by law, unless delegated to the Planning Director; (8) Do and perform such other duties as may be required by law, or such as may be properly appertain to such office; T (9) Make lu own all rules of order when so requested, and to decide all questions or order, subject to an appeal to the Commission; (10) Take into consideration such matters as shall not be within the scope of the duties of powers of any standing committee of the Commission; or as may be referred by the Commission, and to report thereon, together with such recommendations relative thereto as deemed advisable; and (11) Represent the Commission in all functions, not otherwise directed by the Commission as the titular head of the Commission. (b) Clerk. The Planning Director shall serve as Clerk of the Commission and shall be directly responsible, or through staff members, to provide the following services; (1) To receive, submit, and coordinate all matters properly brought before the Commission in consultation with the chairperson; (2) To provide the agenda support materials for all meetings. (3) To read bills, resolutions, and other matters to the Co=ission, as so required;. (4) To forward at once to the proper parties all conununications and other matters, either directly or through a committee, as the case -may be; (5) To deliver immediately to the chairperson of the appropriate committee all petitions, resolutions, bills or other matters as may be duly referred to such committee; (6) To serve in all matters as ex-offrcio clerk of the Commission and to do and perform all clerical duties and services pertaining to such position as the Commission shall from time to time direct, and such as shall by law or the rules, or rules hereafter adopted, be assigned or such as properly pertain to such position; (7) To have charge of all records of the Commission and be responsible for the same. 1-2-9 Committees. There shall be two kinds of committee: (1) Standing Committees, which shall not exceed five members each. (2) Select Corntnunities, which shall not exceed five members each. 1-240 Committee Organization. (a) All committees of the Commission, contemplated under these rules, shall be appointed by the Chairperson subject to confirmation by a majority vote of the members of the Commission. (b) The first person named on a comanittee shall be the chairperson unless otherwise designated. The Committee Chairperson shall tail and preside over committee meetings, and may designate temporary alternate members in order to achieve a quorum and to take action in cases where members are absent. (c) No member shall serge as chairperson of more than one Standing Committee of the Commission. (d) No committee shall meet while the Commission is in session. (e) Comnnittees shall be under the control and subject to the orders and appropriate rules of the Commission, and shall faithfully carry out such orders. (f) Vacancies on the standing committees shall be filled by the Chairperson of the Commission unless otherwise designated in subsection (b) above and no member of the standing committee shall resign therefrom without the consent and approval of the Commission. (g) A majority of the entire membership to which the committee is entitled shall constitute a quorum and the majority vote of the membership present shall be necessary to take any action. 1-2-11 StandingCommittees. The Commission may establish the necessary standing coma- ittees to further the responsibilities and functions of the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission, 1-2-12 Select Committees. A Select Committee shall consist of up to five (5) members, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission and shall be appointed from time to time as the occasion requires, serving until discharged after finally reporting on the special matter referred to it. 1-2-13 Committee Reports. (a) Every committee shall be responsible for writing and submitting a meeting summary to include a list of attendees, topics covered, decisions and/or recommendations to the Commission as whole. (b) Committee chairperson or other committee members shall report to the whole Commission at its meetings about the Committee's work on matters referred to them. (c) Select Committees shall report as required by the Commission upon all matters referred to them, unless further time is allowed by vote of the Commission. (d) Whenever any matter is referred to a committee, it shall be the duty of such comimittee to make diligent inquiry into all of the facts and circumstances connected with such matter. If necessary, the County Attorney may be consulted, documents and. records searched, and everything done to bring all facts pertaining to such matter before the Commission. (e) The report of the committee on any matter shall provide an evaluation and recommendation as to the disposal of such matter. 1-244 Voting.. (a) There shall be three methods of ascertaining the decision of the Commission upon any matter: 1 sti by call of the members and a record made by the Clerk of the vote of each member; 2nd, by viva voca vote; 3", by unanimous consent. (b) Whenever the Commission is ready to vote on any questions, the Chairperson after stating the question, shall put such question to a vote, then announce the result of the vote to the commission. Upon the request if any member of the Commiission, the Cleric shall call the role. Unless a member is excused from voting, his silence shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. (c) No member shall refrain from voting unless excused by the Commission. (d) Whenever the ayes and noes are called, no one, without the unaniinous consent, shall be permitted to explain his vote; and after the announcement of the result, no one shall be permitted to vote or to change his vote. - 1--2-15 Standards of Conduct. (a) Disclosure of interest. Whenever a possible direct personal financial interest on any matter pending before the Commission or any of its committees becomes apparent, the affected member shall promptly make a disclosure to the Commission. When a member had made a disclosure of interest and is deemed by the Conunnission to have as conflict of interest, such conflict shall apply to all subsequent actions relating to said matter. A member with conflict of interest shall refrain fronn voting except where the member's vote is required to constitute a quorum to act in which event he shall be pernxitted to vote. (b) Code of Ethics. All Commission members and officers and employees of the Agency shall be subject and comply with the provision of Chapter 3, Article I, of the Kauai County Code, as amended. w 1-2-16 Petitions and Submittals to the Commission. Any person may petition the Commission. Petitions and other submittals shall be in writing, signed by the petitioners or persons presenting them. 1-2-17 Motions and Amendments. Motions and armendrnents may be verbal, but shall be reduced to writing if requested by the chair, and shall be read from the Clerk's desk, if so desired. 1-2-1 S Motions and Priorities. (a) No motion shall be received and considered by the Commission until the same has been seconded. (b) After a motion is stated or read by the chair, it shall be deemed in the possession of, and shall be disposed of by vote of the Conunission. However, it may be withdrawn by the mover with the consent of the second at any time before a vote or amendment. (c) Whenever any question shall be under discussion, the motions in order relative thereto prior to a vote shall be: first, to table; second, to previous question; third, to modify debate; forth, to postpone definitely; fifth, to commit or reconiniit; and sixth, to amend; which motions shall have precedence in the order named. The first four motions shall be decided without debate, and shall be put as soon as made. (d) When any of said motions shall be decided in the negative, the same shall not be revived at the same meeting relative to the main question under discussion. If all are negative as aforementioned, the only remaining question shall be as to the passage or adoption of the application or any other main question.. (e) No member shall speak longer than five (5) minutes, nor more than twice on the same question without leave of the Commission, unless the member is the mover of the question pending, in which case the member shall be permitted to speak in reply, but not until every member choosing to speak shall have had the opportunity to'speak. 1-2-19 Reconsideration. When a motion has been once made and carried in the affirmative or negative, only a member who voted with the prevailing side may move, at the same meeting, or at the next meeting, to reconsider it, and such motion shall take precedence over all other questions except a motion to adjourn. 1-2-20 Order and Decorum (a) No person shall sit at the desk of the presiding officer or clerk except by permission of the Chairperson, or at the desk of any commissioner, except by permission of that commissioner. (b) While the Chair is putting any question or addressing the Commission, no one shall walk out of the meeting room or across the floor; nor shall anyone entertain a private discourse, or pass between the member and Chair while the member is speaking. (c) When member are about to speak, they shall address themselves to the Chair, and shall confine their comments to the question under discussion, avoiding personalities, (d) If any member, in speaking or otherwise, transgresses these rules of procedure, the chair, or any member, may call him to order, and when so called to order, he shall immediately quiet down. The Chair shall then decide the question or order without debate, subject to an appeal to the Commission. In addition, the Chair may call for the sense of the Conunission on any question of order. (e) Whenever any person shall be called to order while speaking, the member shall be deemed to be in possession of the floor when the question of orders is decided, and may proceed with the matter under discussion within the ruling made on the question of order. (f) No unauthorized person shall enter the floor of commission except by penmission of the presiding officer. The teen "floor of Commission" shall mean that portion of the meeting room general occupied by the Commission and as may be specifically designated by the presiding officer. The presiding officer shall determine, with concurrence of Commissioners, when members of the public may speak on topics being discussed and whether any time limitations per speaker will be set. (g) Any person or persons who willfully disrupt a meeting or hearing to prevent and compromise the conduct of the meeting may be removed from the room. 1-2-21 Order of Business. (a) After roll -call and the approval of the agenda and minutes, the Presiding Officer shall call for business in the following order: 1. General business matters before the commission and announcements 2. Communications 3. Committee Reports 4. Unfinished Business or Old Business 5. New Business (b) The Commission may, by previous motion, direct that any matter be made a special order of business, which shall take precedence as indicated in the order. (c) The unfinished business or old business in which the Conuuission was engaged at the time of the last adjournment shall have the preference in the order of the day except for general business and announcements, communications, and committee reports, and invited speakers, and no other business shall be received until such unfirlished business is disposed of, unless by special leave of the Commission. (d) All questions relating to priority of business to be acted upon by the Commission shall be decided without debate. 1-2-22 Question or Order. A question of order may be raised at any stage of the proceedings, except during a calling of the roll when the ayes and noes are called for. Such questions shall be decided by the Chair, without debate, subject to an appeal to the Commission. 1-2-23 Computation of Time. In computing any period of time under the rules herein, by notice, or by any order or regulation of the Colhinission, the time. begins with the day following that act, event, or default, and includes the last say of the period unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday in which event the period runs until the close of the business of the next day which Is not a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday. 1-2-24 Attendance. No member shall be absent from the service of the Commission, unless the member has so advised the Chair prior to the meeting or be sick and unable to attend. 1-2-25 News Reporters. News reporters wishing to take notes of the business of the Conunission may be assigned such places by the Chair without interfering with the convenience of the Commission. 1-2-26 New Rules and Amendments. No rule of the Commission shall be altered or rescinded, nor shall any new rules be adopted without the affirinative vote of at least five (5) members of the Commission. 1-2-27 When Rules are Silent. For good cause, the Commission may vote to suspend the rules. 1-2-28 Seyerability. If any provision of these Rules and Practice and Procedures or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of these Rules of Practice and Procedures which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of these Rules of Practice and Procedures are severable. Chapter III. Public Records, Inspection and Availability 1-3-1Inspection of Public Records. All public records shall be available for inspection and copying by any person during established office hours and within reasonable timelines unless public inspection of such records is in violation of any other state or federal law. 1-3-2 Where Available. (a) The Public may obtain information on matters within the jurisdiction of the Planning Department and Commission for the County of Kauai, by inquiring at the principle place of business of the Planning Department. All rules, orders or opinions of the agency are on file and available for public inspection at this office during business 4444 Rice Street, Suite A473, Lihue, Kauai 96766-1326. (b) Inquiry may be made in person at the agency during business hours or submitting a request for information in writing to the Planning Director, Planning Department, Kapule Building, 4444 Rice Street, Suite A473, Lihue, Hawaii 96766-1326 1-3-3 Copies of Public Records. Copies of public records printed or reproduced for persons other than goverrinaental agencies shall be given to any person provided the applicable fees or costs for publication, research, and postage are paid. 1-3-4 _Denial of Inspection. Any person aggrieved by the denial -by the officer having custody of any public record of the right to inspect the record or to obtain copies of extracts thereof may seek enforcement action pursuant to HRS Chapter 92. Chapter IV Rule Adoption, Amendment, or Repeal Procedures 1-4-1 Initiation of Rule -Making Proceedings. (a) Motion by Conuni�sion. The Commission may, at time on its own motion, initiate proceeding for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any rule or regulation of the Commission. (b) Petition by person or Agency. Any interested person may petition the Commission for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any rule or regulation of the Commission. Petitions for rule making filed with the Commission will become matters of public record. 1-4-2 Form and Contents. Petitions for rule making shall contain the name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner; the signature of each petitioner; a draft of the substance of the proposed rule or a designation of the provisions the repeal of which is desired; a statement of the petitioner's interest in the subject matter; a statement of the reasons in support of the proposed rule, amendment, or repeal and shall deposit with the County funds sufficient to cover appropriate meeting publication costs. 1-4-3 Action on Petition. The Commission'shall, within thirty (30) days after the filing of a petition for rule making, either deny the petition in writing, stating its reasons for denial or initiate proceedings in accordance with Section 91-3 HRS. (a) Denial of Petition. Any petition that fails in material respect to comply with the requirements herein of that fails to disclose sufficient reasons to justify the institution of public rule -making proceedings will not be considered by the Comin.ission. The Commission shall notify the petitioner in writing of such -denial, stating the reasons thereto. Denial of a petition shall not operate to prevent the Commission from acting, on its own motion, on any matter disclosed in the petition. (b) Acceptance of Petition. If the Commission determines that the petition is in order and that it discloses sufficient reasons in support of the proposed rule -making to justify the institution of rule -making proceedings, the following procedure set forth and applicable statutes and law shall apply. 1-4-4 Notice of public Hearing to discuss Rule Adoption, Amendment or Repeal. (a) Publication and mailing. When, pursuant to a petition therefore or upon its own motion, the Commission proposes to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule or regulation, a notice or proposed rulemaking shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general - circulation which is published and issued within the County of Kauai; and such notice shall also be mailed to all persons or agencies who have made timely written requests for advance notice of the Commission's rulemakulg proceedings at their last recorded address. The notices shall be published at least thirty (30) days prior to the date set for public hearing. (b) Form. A notice of the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule or regulation shall include the requirements set forth in HRS Chapter 91-3 . 1-4-5 Commission Action. The Commission shall consider all relevant testimony and documents of record before taking final action in a rule -making proceeding. Final action should be taken within forty-five (45) days after the end of period for submission of written comments or recommendations. 1-4-6 Effective Date. All rules shall be filed and take effect pursuant to HRS 914 1-4-7 Emergency Rule Making. Notwithstanding the foregoing rules, the Commission may adopt emergency rules in accordance to the provision of HRS 91-3 and 4 if the Commission finds that an imininent peril to public health or safety requires adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule or regulation upon less than thirty (30) days' notice of hearing, and states in writing its reasons for such finding, it may proceed without prior notice or hearing or upon such abbreviated notice and hearing as it finds practicable to adopt an emergency rule or regulation to be effective for a period not longer than one hundred twenty (120) days without renewal. The emergency rule shall become effective upon filing with the County Clerk. KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RENOVATIONS OF BUILDING B 2440 KOLO ROAD KILAUEA, KAUA` I, HAWAI ` I TAX MAP KEY: (4) 5-2-009:006 JOB NO. Q41000-14 FOR THE : BY THE: KAUA`I SCHOOL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAI`1 ARCHITECT: MASON ARCHITECTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: TANIMURA & ASSOCIATES, INC 119 MERCHANT STREET, SUITE 56i 925 BETHEL STREET #309 HONOLJJW, HI 96813 HONOLULU, HI 96813 CIVIL ENGINEER: AKINAKA & ASSOCIATES MECHANICAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENTERPRISES, INC APPROVALS: 3375 KOAPAKA STREET, SUITE 3266 501 SUMNER STREET J503 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96819 HONOLULU, HI 9ES17 FOB, PUBLIC VYORKS ADMINISTRATOR DATE D EPAFFTMENT OF EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTAL: EMET ENVIRONMETEO SERVICES ELECTRICAL ENGINEER., ELECTECH HAWAII, INC. STATE OF HAWAII 94-520 UKEE STREET 1100 WARD AVENUE, SUITE 750 WAIPAHU, HAWAII 96797 HONOLULU, HAWNI 96814 OT PROJECT LOCATION P�` 4, 'fir �J v / e0� /'E •\ \'� 7 4 i KILAUEA ANAHOLA 1"a - DIrxv HIT VENA Isrex^? p .T.D.A. S.T.D.N. S.N. AS PACIFIC MISSILE STATION KAPA'A RANGE FACILITY o R a \a BARKING SANDS S &• / / \$ ,{ HANAMA` ULU WAIMEA KALAHEO�..� PROJECT O 4 \ KEKAHA S LIHL1'E LOCATION c� Exlmxc rur cvum KAUMAKAN€ HANAPEPE— o �? as DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ®r w STATE 4F HAWM 9 1 luMarp �1 .,� PROrFS9CMl1 kU`h7a BUILDING B KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HY� AREAOF WORK / ' rv=.mn * RENOVATION OF BUILDING 6 S P KILAUEA, HAWAII 4tt'AII, 5 TMK: (415-2-009A08 _ 1 This work wes prepared by TITLE SHEET. PROJECT TEAM, VICINITY MAP, LOCATION MAP, REFERENCE REFERENCE CAMP MAP, GENERAL SCOPE OE WORK ISLAND OF KAUF1 NI NORTH "—` -fir NORTH me or under my supervision W � TOWN 9F KILAUFA amla — J33M NORTH and construction of this MASON ARCHITECTS, INC. E°eF0. VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL T-01 WEST EAST WEST EAST WEST EAST project will be IFndsY my GM GM EC NOT ID SCALE SOUTH NOT TO SCALE NOT TOPICS MAP servaf on. Oati�oD-z< {� ewwxar R SONEH i 4l3a7pt8 1 sOUiH N.B. Spa EapGatMn Oam dtls u-anse ewe MARCH 2O16 AS Na7EP 55Tin 0V 11 t O 1-1 25' o � P N O I P EXIST FH EXIST BOLLARDS j' NEW CONC J'ALKWAY SEE DETAIL; A/S201 A2 �x~x� x� N INSTALL DUST SCREEN SEE DETAIL C-007 —81, THICK TEMPORARY INSTALL SILT FENCE - STABILIZED SEE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION C-00'2 ENTRANCE t a,7s' NEW STAIRS SEE ARCH r DWGS 3 � NEW STAIRS- SEE� ARCH DWGS.. NEW CONC WALKWAY SEE DETAIL A/S2U1 EXIST WATERLINE, 0 b.y APPROX LOCATION 1 \ V O 0 o -- ACCESSIBLE RAMP ARCH DWGS BUILDING B NEW IWS SYSTEM, SEE SET C-201 FOR PLAN & PROFILE 1000 GAL -SEPTIC TANK ' 319.72 319.59 ��y'dL 5:0�' 319.22 319.0� 319.69 319.4 Jx / / INSTALL DUST SCREEN SEE, ETAIL 2 / � -0U EXIST 1-1/4' / WATERLINE PER DOE JOB NC. ',// P4i805-08 / / / f , SEE MECH DWGS FOR CONN ,x` _ vJ - �v� LEGEND 378.26 / EXISTING PROPOSED 318.34 a WATERLINE -F�I— i �� 0 318.31/ �' SILT FENCE —x x— // 31&32' aQ PROPERTY LINE ! AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAY / DUST SCREEN BUILDING 0 MIN CONCRETE / NEW SCALE. SLOPE 7b STAIRS 318.87-�, OAYLIGH CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Q V 1 O' D 1 D' 2 O' SCALE: t" = 10'-0" ADD 2 A ADD CO ENTRANCE, REUESE 51LT/OUST FENCE 4/25/16 AA ,a omamnoa '" w.E xnwa a— C.. TA4 f DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF HAWAII o=ti UGENSED KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7 p * PROFESSIDNAL * ENGINEER RENOVATION OF BUILDING B N°.r,eF�c �qwp° KILAUEA, KAUAT HAWAII Sr TMK: (4) 5-2-009:006 SITE PLAN SITE PLAN This work was prepared by SCALE: 1" = 10' me or under my supervision and construction of this MINAKMASOCWTE$ LTD. m•a,a project w[Il be under my observation C-101 GHK JCT OL1000.11 GHK �m u1t �s as 4/30I2016 — ASNOTm -7,,, L�- N,YZCH2NO 56 _ DRAWING CONVENTIONS ABBREVIATIONS INDEX TO DRAWINGS BUILDING SECTION LETTER INDICATES BUILDING SECTION SHEET NUMBER WHERE SECTION IS FOUND DETAIL SECTION NUMBER INDICATES DETAIL SHEET NUMBER WHERE DETAIL IS FOUND DETAIL ENLARGEMENT12 NUMBER INDICATES DETAIL J SHEET NUMBER WHERE DETAIL IS FOUND TITLE SYMBOLS LEFLER INDICATES BUILDING SECTION NUMBER INpICATES ELEVATION, WALL SECTION OR DETAIL SHEET DRAWN ON GRID LINE 1 BUBBLE ALPHA HORIZONTALLY GR NUMBERS VERTICALLY AMP ADJ ALUM & APPROX A5 & BLKG BD BS HOT BLDG OLD COMPR GONG CMU CENT DEL DEFS DO DS EA ELEC EQ EPDM EXIST EXITEKTERIOR FAI FIN FF FD FS FT FRZ GALV GA GEN GYP HW ITT H ACRYLIC MODIFIED POLYESTER ADJUSTABLE ALUMINUM AND APPROXIMATELY ASPHALT SHINGLE AT BLOCKING BOARD BOTH SIDES BOTTOM BUILDING CENTER LINE CEILING COMPRESSOR CONCRETE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONTINUOUS DETAIL DIRECT APPLIED EXTERIOR FINISHSYSTEM DOOR OPENING DOWNSPOUT EACH ELECTRICAL EQUAL ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE MONOMER EXISTING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FINISH FINISH FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR SINK FOOT, FEET FREEZER GALVANIZED GAUGE GENERATOR GYPSUM HARD WOOD HEIGHT HIGH KIT LAM LAV MANUF MAX MECH MET MIN NO OC OF01 PTO PEAS PLYWD PVC # R REF REQ NO 5ND SCHED SHT SIM SC SAFB 55T STL STRUCT SATC TEMP THK TPD T&G TYP UNO WC WR W WO W/ WD KITCHEN LAMINATE LAVATORY MANUFACTURER MAXIMUM MECHANICAL METAL MINIMUM NOT IN CONTRACT ON CENTER OWNER FURNISHED OWNER INSTALLED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER PLASTIC PLYWOOD POLYVINYL CHLORIDE POUND RADIUS REFRIGERATOR REQUIRED ROUGH OPENING SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL SCHEDULED SHEET SIMILAR SOLID CORE SOUND ATTENUATION FIBERGLASS BATT STAINLESS STEEL STEEL STRUCTURAL SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILING TEMPORAIRY THICK TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TONGUE AND GROOVE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE WATERCLOSET WATER RESISTANT WIDTH WINDOW OPENING WITH WOOD DRAWING N0. SHEET ND. SHEET TITLE GENERAL 01 7-01 TITLE SHEET, PROJECT TEAM, VICINITY MAP, LOCATION MAP, CAMPUS MAP, GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK 02 T-02 CODE INFORMATION, DRAWING CONVENTIONS, INDEX TO DRAWINGS, GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS CIVIL 03 C-001 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS, DEMO NOTES, ENERGY EFFICIENCY CAI -CS 04 C-002 ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN 05 C-101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - NEW WORK, DUCT SECTION 06 C-201 SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 07 0-601 LIGHTING PLAN - NEW WORK Ob C-602 POWER PLAN -NEW WORK ARCHITECTURAL 09 AD101 DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN 10 AD201 DEMOLITION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NORTH & WEST 11 AD202 DEMOLITION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SOUTH & EAST A-101 FLOOR PLAN 13 A-102 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 14 _ A-103 ROOF PLAN 15 A-104 FURNITURE PLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY 16 A-105 ENLARGED RAMP AND ENTRY PLAN - EAST 17 A-106 ENLARGED STAIR PLANS -WEST & NORTH 18 A-107 DOWNSPOUT DRAINAGE PLAN 19 A-108 FLOOR FINISH PLAN 20 A-201 EXTERIOR FLFVATIONS - NORTH & WEST 21 A-202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -SOUTH &EAST 22 A-203 RAMP ELEVATIONS 23 A-301 BUILDING SECTION 24 A-302 BUILDING SECTION 25 A-401 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 26 A-402 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 27 A-403 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 28 A-501 RAMP DETAILS 29 A-502 STAIR & RESTROOM DETAILS 30 A-503 ROOF DETAILS 31 A-504 COUNTER DETAILS 32 A-505 WINDOW DETAILS 33 A-506 WINDOW & DOOR DETAILS 34 A-507 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 35 A-601 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULE & TYPES 36 A-602 COLOR & MATERIAL SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REASONABLY DESCRIBE THE INTENT OF THE QUALITY AND SCOPE OF THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROJECT. WHERE DETAILS ARE NOT SHOWN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROCEED FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTED QUALITY STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN THE STATE OF HAWAII FOLLOWING THE GENERAL INTENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CLARIFICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER FOR REVIEW BEFORE PROCEEDING. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK AND SHALL. NDTIFY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER OF ANY DISCREPANCY AND/OR CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT HIM/HER FROM FULFILLING THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT. WHERE EXISTING CONDITIONS REQUIRE DETAILS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS TD VARY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE CDNTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER IN WRITING AND PROPOSE ALTERNATE METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR CONSIDERATION, ARCHITECT/ENCINEER SHALL REVIEW ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS & PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE APPROVALS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITING ANY REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. SUCH CHANGES TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, 4. QUANTITIES SHOWN AND/OR SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL QUANTITIES, 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTALS AND COORDINATE THE WORK OF THE VARIOUS TRADES TO FIT ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND MAKE INTERFACING ADJUSTMENTS AS REOUIRED. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE DURING BIDDING TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS; BID SHALL BE WED ON ACTUAL CONUITIONS. 7. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC), ADAAG, AND OTHER APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT_ S. DIMENSIONS: DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO FACE OF FRAMING MEMBERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 9. (E) MEANS 'EXISTING'. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONFIRM SIZES. 10. "REPLACE' MEANS TO REMOVE EXISTING AND TO FURNISH AND INSTALL "NEW" ITEM TO MATCH THE EXISTING DESIGN, SUCH AS MATERIAL, THICKNESS, COLOR, QUALITY, CONSTRUCTION, ETC.. UNLESS 07HERWI5E DETAILED OR NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDRION AND DESIGN PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 11. ALL EXISTING ITEM5 AND/OR FINISHES SCHEDULED TO REMAIN, BUT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND OVERPRINTED EX[STINC MATERIALS, SHALL BE CORRECTED TO MATCH THE EXISTING MATERIAL AND FINISHES AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE STATE AND TO THE STATE'S SATISFACTION. 12, ALL MATERIALS, ITEMS, WORK, NOTED IN THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE "NEW", UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AS EXISTING. 13, 'PROVIDE" SHALL MEAN FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW ITEMS) AS DETAILED OR NOTED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 14, WHERE WARRANTIES ARE SPECIFIED, CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE FULL COMPLIANCE OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THE WARRANTIES. WHERE THE MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS VARY FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE STRICTER OF THE TWO PROVIDING REQUIREMENTS DO NOT VOID WARRANTY. CONTRACTOR SHALL INFORM THE CONTRACTING OFFICER IN WRITING, PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS, AND AS -BUILT DRAWINGS WHERE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL DEVIATE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 15. THE CDNTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL ITEMS, IN AND ABOVE GROUND WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM SETTLEMENT AND DAMAGE. SETTLEMENT AND DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS, SIDEWALKS, UTILITY LINES (PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, DATA, ETC.), LANDSCAPING, LAWN, HOSE13I55, ETC., BY THE CONTRACTOR, THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, AND EQUIPMENT, SHALL BE REPLACED AND/OR REPAIRED AT NO EXTRA C05T TO THE STATE. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL SURFACES EXPOSED FROM CUTTING AND/OR REMOVAL WORK. PATCH SHALL MATCH THE MATERIAL AND FINISH OF ADJACENT SURFACES, 17. ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISP05ED OF OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF THE STATE'S PROPERTY DAILY. AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL ITEMS AND EQUIPMENT TEMPORARILY REMOVED OR RELOCATED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS SHALL BE REINSTALLED €N THE SAME LDCA7ION PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL, OR IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AS NOTED IN THE DRAWINGS, DR IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE OWNER. 15. PAINT APPLICATION SHALL BE BY BRUSH AND ROLLER ONLY. SEE SPECIFICATION FOR SAND FINISH PAINT REQUIREMENTS, 19, FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION OR DEMOLITION SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 57 OF THE 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 20, ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS INCLUDE INFORMATION FROM CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR GENERAL INFORMATION AND COORDINATION. 21, THE DEMOLITION PLAN REPRESENTS ONLY GENERAL DEMOLITION. ALL ITEMS TO BE REMOVED, TEMPORARILY REMOVED AND REINSTALLED, ETC. ARE NOT NECLSSAR€LY SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED DEMOLITION REMOVAL, TEMPORARY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT, CUTTING, PATCHING, ETC., AS REOUIRED TO FACILITATE THE SUBJECT CONSTRUCTION WORK COMPLETE. VERIFY AND COMPARE ALL DRAWINGS (ALL DISCIPLINES) FOR THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, TEMPORARY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT, CUTTING, PATCHING, ETC. WORK. STRUCTURAL 37 5-101 GENERAL NOTES 36 5-201 FOUNDATION PLAN 39 5-202 1 FLOOR AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN 42 M-1 GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND, ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE --- 43 M-2 PLUMBING DEMOLITION PLAN 44 M-3 NEW PLUMBING PLAN AND DIAGRAMS 45 M-4 NEW MECHANICAL PLAN 46 M-5 MECHANICAL SCHEDULE, DETAILS ELECTRICAL 47 E-001 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS, DEMO NOTES, ENERGY EFFICIENCY CALCS 45 E-100 ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN 49 E-101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - NEW WORK, DUCT SECTION 50 E--200 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN 51 E-201 LIGHTING PLAN - NEW WORK 52 E-262 POWER PLAN - NEW WORK 53 E-203 SIGNAL PLAN - NEW WORK 54 E-5U0 LUMINAIRE DETAILS 55 E-501 DIAGRAMS. SCHEDULES AND NOTES CODE INFORMATION: TMK: 5-2-9:6 & 46 KAUAI COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE: LOT SIZE: 353,437 SF (&34 ACRES) ZONING; R-4 HEIGHT LIMIT. 30 FT FLOOD ZONE: BUILDING CODE: IBC 2006 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-B OCCUPANCY: B ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 9,000 SF BUILDING AREA: 2,347 SF COVERED LANAI AREA: 174 SE Amy ® ITEVLSEn INDEXT0DRAWING8 41Z5'78 "�� v.aorvi wr �nnm: 4}Iu (J uets� DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF HAWAII KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL .Z111T T * ca<on RENOVATION OF BUILDING B y4�AII, \3"- KILAUEA, HAWAII 7MK:(4)5-2-099A08 OODP INFOI I MATION, DRAWING CONVENTIONS, INDEX TO DRAWINGS, GENERAL NOTES,PBBREVIATIONS This work was prepared by me or under my supervision MASON ARCHITECTS, INC. wcm'a �6 and ocris ctlonofthis project will be under my T�02 �rcGM a„c,mrr; G1d 0rvadonn... � - n410Ou-14 MARCH 2O16 55 _ sk;.— Eatntia. mn° tre lbm AS NOTED c NEW CONC A,20Q WALKWAY Ai A-105 C - m o G.IL — — — — — — — — — — — — — � 4 I I 0 DS&Ss — - 2. STORAGE . - - -� - - STORAGE _ 3. 4. t,9 tat D I I I II v SINK STORAGE Ll - ® 114 - v j� im V — 503 — 77 tas �. ,oa 1 W tvfl �� 24" x 44" x 4" THK 2HK 9 FE SLAB BELOW n rs I — I SLAB BELOW] ,3a 3'C 4" \ PRINCIPAL RE5 RWOMEOOM OFFICE 10'-fl" x 14'-6" OFFICE ca ,oa I I FE (1e0SF) ( , 4° _ e CLEAR ,6s I'! ta5 Wd Al I c I 73g 140 T-O 141 ,42 143 199 145 7'$y4 14a ,99 tv9 B'-1f" V-79/4^ 4 AS A408 79a MEETING ROOM Aafl1 � 1Ve iur A� LOBBY ui GENERAL OFFICES 0 '� 6" WD STUDS tze O (260 SF) „e SASA MEN'3 — 4'8" HIGH PTN _ ,]AN RESTROOM SS - -._-rt WALL &MULLION a LAV ROUTE DS UNDERBLDG O SEER-107 NEW 7x4T&G i 6'�" _ 4 q" EXISTING DECK - m — — — — WALL & ROUTE DS - MULLION UNDER BLDG NEW STONE — WALLS NEW RAILINGS EXIST ASPHALT PAVING APPROXIMATE EDGE OF EXISTING ROAD - FLOOR PLAN eGALE-.114.. = i'a' REF FROM: WALKWAY A Q A, 6 A�1;t c INT ELEV KEY E PLAN 5 NORTH 1N a p' 4' 1. NEW 1 x6 T&G CLG w1 VJT EXIST E j MOLDING € L FT L I II ,k.-......_4.5 u PARTIAL HT WALLS BELOW I____------- G1 € V �- C----I TT W Li I I I I ----7 C----� REMOVE CANEC, INSTALL ,4A"�- --g.-p'-.�.. NEWGYPBDAFTER - INSTALLING Rig INSUL NEW ROLL -UP BLIND - _...... _ 2.3,E 2'-0" C----C 4 N � NZ. 8'-0" 0.'�" 2C x 22" ATTIC Aso2 ACCESS PANEL N 4° N 7-0" 8'-0" 7-4- 4A" rn I I I ip ' ris i C3 --I PARTIAL J / FAN ! LIGHTS WALLS BELOW J� REMOVE & REINSTALL EXIST NEW 314" QUARTER HISTORIC MOLDINGS IN LOBBY ROUND CORNICE MOLDINGS, TYP ALL ROOMS, EXCEPT AT LOBBY AS NOTED EXIST T&G CLNG TO REMAIN (PAINT) REFELCTED CEILING PLAN SCALE:114" =1'-0" REFFROM: LEGEND 0 EXISTING SINGLE WALL TO REMAIN NEW FULL HEIGHT WALLS - 2 x 4 STUDS @ iB" OC wI s/8' GYP BD EA SIDE & 3" ACOUSTICAL INSULATION NEW 1 x B T&G WOOD CEILING NEW GYPBD CEILING, TYP THROUGHOUT L -1 SUSPENDED CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE CEILING FAN I LIGHT ® AIRCONDITIONER n � + rn. �ewe,prr °Xf u,e rmw� DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION n�EA STATE EF HAwar KIL4UEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RENOVATION OF BUILDING B y v 4k'Alr, KILAUEA, HAWAII fig. TMK:(4)5-2-009:006 This work was Prepared by REFLECTED CEILING PLAN me or under my supervision NORTH 5 End OOristructiGn of this MASON ARCHITECTS, INC. - - - Prejecl will be under my mm�rer. �+ .r. A-102 W serYStlnn. l/r GM GM Q41ODD-14 0 24' B' 'l `� l� 1 ^" 2`"-- a39rzu76 m SEC, AW wrnwrflm XX oNr= r�r �13 s'a'"k'B-w�+4�on ode ma,e Lwnes AS NOTEC MARCH 201E - 55 92 INSTALL NEW REMOVE EXISTING ROOFI14G- ASQ3 GUTTER INSTALL NEW SINGLE PLY e2 INSTALL NEW ROOFING Ab63 GUTTER REPLACE ROOF DECK W1 NEW 1 x 6 TO MATCH EXISTING REPLACE SHEATHING Wf REMOVE EXISTING ROOFING - --- SHEATHING aW PLYWOOD INSIDE, INSTALL NEW SINGLE PLY _ I x 6 T&G OUTSIDE ROOFING I- - - �- NEW ROOF 3'-0' REPLACE SPLIT RAFTER A308 REPLACE 3FA2xB RAFTERS r' .. .- m EL t E [ 11 I pg IM Aao3 IN NEW GUTTER i --......... f o o RD E i i E — F 3HIN3 � I ILL 11 ' T - _ RZ REMOVE EXISTING CORRUGATED METAL ROOFING AND WOOD SHINGLES BENEATH - INSTALL NEW CORRUGATED METAL ROOFING LI-0" on ommrmi E. w- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LC-k9ro GTATE OF HAWAIi KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL xann RENOVATION OF BUILDING B Y P RI%AII, KILAUEA, HAWAII u5 TMK: (4) 5 2-009:008 _ This work was prepared 6y ROOF PLAN me or under my supervision PL.Ar! �g and eons6,beundFr MAS9N ARLHfTELTS. INL, R��I ��� NORTH p,dJaot will be and®r my my o�ncr. cNxFew: A-143 041000-14 W servsUoonn.. �;,I 1 GM GM 0 2 4' e /1 a _, m 7 wt E Ec, nw Kx �14 REF FROM: a3azo,e =�^6�B tpb¢[no ¢¢�dn+e �saroo acne AS NOTED MARCH 2016 55 STORAGE c" q J� STORlGE tiN STORAGE — 2L] r TABLE COPIER / OFFICE OMENS RSTROOM A �W (160 SF) OFFICE a PRINCIPAL--- 11,x10'-g"TM -- m ' GENERAL OFFICES MEETING ROOM - (2505E) LOBBY (250 SF) z 3 ____ SASA �_ — __ I {JI JAN MEWS ti '� Jf� STORAGE REST EXISTING DECK ® DN -- -' C7 c� c C� a I - $ i f � E 1 1, e a ADD 2 ® FLOOR FINISH PLAN 9 OF 2 4/25/15 st—, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF HAWNI KILAUEq ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RENOVATION OF BUILDING B KILAUEA, HAWAII TMK. (4) 5-2-0091)06 E This work was prepared by FURNITURE PLAN - FOR REFERENCE ONLY me or under my supervision PLAN - weoaw onaw��n FURNITURE PLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY NORTH ,_ - s arsdmnsillbeunaFth3s Mayo ancyrEcrq, i�c.� project will be under my �,goo_, 4 W SeYvaGtln. GM GM A-1 04 0 2' 4B'' 9VLE: 9f9"=9'-0" ��— 4130r2U98 EC X% 15 REF FROM: s4i'�^' ���i[�sorme�komc —•z AS NOTED MARCH 2015 55 , ASSUMED 0.0 LEVEL 0.17 4 4 a Q a 1 4 A a - A301 0.22 022 4 4 d i1 5,-0" C.J.CLE 4 4 4 n 4 0.27 0.27 A1A A< 4 * T 2 n U G 4 �033 a 4 x 51 41 6 - LOPE _ - - MAX 1:12.6 4 4 4 A1A - 4 ud 0.33 4 G- - �1 x 6 T&G PECKING c+ 13.42 1' ^ JIry U � Al MAX 112 x N + T-B" } ZZ-o" 5,-0, 5'-3" 4 �C 4 4 v 4, a a 4 v a � a x6 O_ ft !R m m I — — I �s E. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION p Lrfuso STATE OF HAWAA gaFFtisnwnl KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ne.mrs RENOVATION OF BUILDING B P KILAUEA. HAWAII Rk'Aik U`' TMK:(4)8-2-00"06 This work was prepared by ENLARGED RAMP AND ENTRY PLAN - EAST me or under my supervision and construction of this MASON ARCHIIECIS, INc, glacLw311heundarmy a®AIM m�aanrc 041000-14 A-1055 ENLARGED RAMP AND ENTRY PLAN - EAST oes®„atim, - AI SCALE T4--1'-0" mwn er: w� ex�r Q 1' 2' 3' MAW � XR REF FROM: X101 9�"O�°-�i��r"�OOrd10I 140 AS NOTED MARCri 2016 a 55 ,,,,a REMOVE EXISTING PLYWOOD. INSTALL NEW 1 n6 T & G DECKING DS & SB BELOW EXISTING POSTS & RAILS NEW THRESHOLD Ct STEPS & PORCH Z_ SAIj2° W (N) 44 POST BELOW NEW RAIL 4� EXISTING POSTS & RAIL (N) STONE WALLS SLOPE @Y IFTAWAY FROM BOTTOM RISER TO 40" AWAY FROM RISER Ai C9 A� ENLARGE® STAIR PLAN - WEST Al SCALE:34 =1'-0 0 11E' 8' REF FROM: A-1e1 GUARDRAIL ENLARGE® STAIR PLAN - NORTH REF FROI AA91 reawx e. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION C�" LtFNsro STATE OF HAWAII mo�eavcr2a aaciil,TCT KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RENOVATION OFBUILDING B h W 4k'41I 5 IILALEA, HAWAII TMK: (4) 5 2-009A08 This work was prepared by ENLARGED STAIR PLANS - WEST & NORTH me or under my supervision and construction of this MASON a GRITEcTS, INC wreww °6I��C pro)ect will be under my , ��GMoGM -614 observation. aat000-ta V V a.'zola mariar: Alvxx v: u,. aiQr tT 8gyeWm F Wmolma Lbnm °�� AS HOTEL' MARCH 2016 55 n� I I I I I I Y�-TYP FOR e I ' I / I ROUTE DS UNDER BLDG ROUTE 4" ABS DRAIN L114ES ROUTE DS UNDER BLDG. SUPPORT FROM UNDER TYP DS & SPLASHBLOCK. FLOOR @ MAX B'-0" OC TP BLDG SEE PLAN & ELEVATIONS SPLASHBLOCK AT DAYLIGHT L_J AMBq+ i1V. wasvgl Art` W� pRcrE A a_ e DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION a AA03 STATE OF HAWAII pAOFE49pFlM1 �xcnnEcr KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL E�mrs * RENOVATION OF BUILDING H INT ELEV KEY h, w KILAUEA, HAWAII 4j%'Arl, %3y TMK: (4) 52-000UOS E ,LAST This work was prepared by DS DRAINAGE PLAN NORTHes me or under my supervision and construction of this MASON ARCWTECTS, INC.proj mi na mxx�cn PLAN OF ®S DRAINAGE W obse«w€Ilbeundermyervation. a R.cA �� cM A-107 obsQafoao—ia pEFFROM:AllA-10i 4; 30EC Xx PMe �'�°a emaelenowoemelm� AS NO -FED MARw 2016 55 LEGEND NEW IY4" Pl. NEW 1)ie l Al rLVVR f IIV1�7f1 l—Lf'11V sraLE: va' = r-0' REF FROM: E PLAN a NORTH W 0 2' a- S. RESILIENT FLOOR TILL CERAMICTILE PAINTED s/" PLYWD PAINTED 1X6 T&G w N W It O O O DOOR STOP BEYOND VINYL TILE FLOORING EXIST FLOOR DOOR PEMKO196B THRESHOLD CER TILE THRESHOLD DETAIL UJ REF HIOM: ACD-2 ® I—FINI8HP— 1OF2 I —I. 0.W Yi M. VmIVIGH ar""- �1F NAW� �aN E. p ucclscu DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF HAWAII KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PPar�ssnau axcnTcr RENOVATION OF BUILDING B S E" 4�A+4 U y KILAUEA, HAWAII TMK: (4) 5-2-099:D66 FLOOR FINISH PLAN This wont was prepared by me ar under my supervision MA$HN ARCHITECTS, INC and COnstiuclion OT thla projac€ wil€ be under my ,observation. 9a10ao-1a A_108 „- , GM — „ m GM ETsxx ur MARCH 2016 atB 55 ,, 9�ncGxe F. �.YalM onicamaW ea �°e AS NOTED NEW C EXIST WEST ELEVATION o 1 z 4 C1 eraEE:va°=,� FIEF FROM: EXIST VENT TO oraren.i oroi A — REPLACE CORN HOARDS REPLACE ONE B NORTH ELEVATION_ ter % SCALE: Vf =r-0' .., ..,, .-.,..... REFFROM: ML L V WALKWAY 'OND O RENOVATED KEYNOTES 1. NEW BOARD & BATTENS 2. NEW RIM BEAM 3. NEW DRIP 4. NEW CASING TO MATCH EXIST 5. NEW GUTTER S. NEW DOWNSPOUT T. NEW FLOOR STRUCTURE AT CLOSET 9, NEW WINDOW 9, NEW SINGLE PLY ROOFING 10. NEW CORRUGATED ROOFING 11. NEW 1X8 S48 APRON TYP, LION w. a� a� xeweu k OSTATE nG�� DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF HAWAII KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RENOVATION OF BUILDING B H t' gh'AII, u s KILAUEA, HAWAII TMK: (4) 5-2-009:06 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- NORTH & WEST This work was prepared by me or under my supervision MA50N ARCHITECTS, INC. and construction of this project will be under my A-20.a off GM c•u mer. GM observation. Na,aoo-,a rmw.r XK drz MARCH 2O G ex.rT 14 a�3o.`zo,e�EC AS NOTED *NDOW SCHEDULE DOOR SCHEDULE WINDOW NUMBER ROOM NAME SIZE HEAD HEIGHT TYPE DETAILS REMARKS ODOR NUMBER ROOM NAME DOOR FRAME FINISH HARDWARE GROUP REMARKS WIDTH HEIGHT HEAD JAMB SILL SIZE TYPE MATERIAL DETAILS 101 PRINT ROOM 0 O O A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 WIDTH HEIGHT THICKNESS HEAD IAMB THRESHOLD 102 PRINT ROOM O O O A A2/A-505 A2/A--505 A2/A-505 101 ENTRY 6'-0" 7'-0" 1-3/4" A WOOD 34/A-506 54/A-505 BS/A-507 1 103 PRINT ROOM O O O A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 102 OFFICE 2 '-9" 7'-0" 1-3/4' B WOOD B5/A-506 Sim E5/A-505 - 2 104 PRINT ROOM O1 O1 O1 A A2/A--505 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 103 GENERAL OFFICE 3'-0" 2'-8' 1-3/4y C WOOD -- B4/A-504 - 3 105 OFFICE O O1 O1 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 104 OFFICE 3'-0" 7'-G' 1-3/4" B WOOD --/A-506 - 2 106 OFFICE O O1 �1 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 105 PRINCIPAL 3'-0" 7'-0" 1-3/4' B WOOD --/A-506 - 2 107 OFFICE O Oi 01 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 105A STORAGE/KTCH 3'-0. 7'-0" 1-3/9" B WOOD A4/A-506 A4/A-505 - 5 108 PRINCIPAL (D (D (DA A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 106 RESTROOM IE I I 3'-0" 7'-0" 1-3/4" B WOOD A4/A-506 A4/A-505 C5/A-507 4 109 PRINCIPAL O CI O1 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 107 RESTROOM 3'-0" 71--0' 1-3/4" B WOOD A4/A-505 A4/A-505 C5/A-507 4 110 STORAGE O2 OP E C Bl/A-505 E1/A-506 B7/A-506 1D8 STORAGE 3'-0' 7'-0" 1-3/8" B WOOD A4/A-505 4/A-505 - 5 lx2 CASING INSIDE, lx6 CASING OUTSIDE 111 STORAGE O2 O2 E C B1/A-506 Bl/A-506 B1/A-566 109 ENTRY 6'-0" 7'-0" 1-3/4" A WOOD 64/A-506 34/A-506 135/A-507 1 VERIFY EXIST OPENING SIZE 112 STORAGE OZ O2 E C B7/A-506 0l/A-506 B7/A-506 110 MEETING ROOM 3'-0' 7'-C" 1-3/4" B WOOD (E) (E) -- Z ADD 5/B" x 1 1/2" STOPS 3 SIDES 113 STORACE 2'-1O" 31-6" 7'-0" B A2/A-5U5 SIM A2/A-505 SIM A2/A-505 Sim NEW WINDOW ill STORAGE 3'-0" T -0 1-3 B" / B WOOD A4 A-506 /" A4/A-506 - 5 1x4 CASING BOTH SIDES 114 RESTROOM 2'-10" 5'-1" - B - - - EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE RIGHT !NT STOP 112 STORAGE 2'-8" 7'-C" 1-3/4" D WOOD (E) (E) B5/A-507 6 13 STORAGE 2'-10" 6'-9" 1-3/4" 0 WOOD (E) (E) 55/A-507 7 116 RESTROOM E E E A - - - REPLACE LOWER SASH w/OBSCURE GLASS. REPLACE LEFT JAMB 117 RESTROOM E E E B - - - REPLACE 2 PANES OF LOWER SASH w/ XXXXXXXX. REPLACE SILL & NEW SASH CORD 118 RESTROOM 2'-10" 5'-1" E A - - - REPLACE UPPER AND LOWER SASH DOOR TYPES 119 GENERAL OFFICES 3'4 2'-9" 5'-0" F -/A-506 -/A-50B -/A-506 INTERIOR WINDOW, NEW �F—SIZE SIZE SIZE J �r 1/4"SAFETY �� -�� t/Z" HARM120 atass PANEL SIZE - 5„ 04 % ASM o V O WOOD DOOR PANFIN FLOOR ENTRY EL-"- OSOLID CORE DOGR O GATE pO WOOD WOO WOOD CENERAL OFFICES O (D (DA A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 121 GENERAL OFFICES O1 O O1 A A2/A-505 A2/A-595 AZ/A-505 122 GENERAL OFFICES O1 O O1 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 123 GENERAL OFFICES (DO (DA A2/A-5D5 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 124 GENERAL OFFICES O O O1 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 125 GENERAL OFFICES (D O1 (DA A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 125 MEETING ROOM O O O A A2/A-5D5 A2/A-595 AZ/A-505 I % N D O YY TYPES yPES 127 MEETING ROOM O1 O 01 A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 AZ/A-505 5IZE SIZE S S S I� w � L �P g 4 w - i z Q aw FIN FLOOR O DOUBLE HUNGWINDOW WINDOW BLE O E O NING HOPPER O O JALOUSIEFIXED O WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW 128 MEETING ROOM O O (DS A A2/A-5Q5 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 129 MEETING ROOM O O2 - C Al/A-506 Al/A-506 Al/A-ME 130 MEETING ROOM O O - C Al /A-506 Al/A-506 A1/A-506 13l MEETING ROOM O2 OZ G Al/A-506 Al/A-596 Ai/A-506 132 STORAGE O O - E - -- - STRIP JALOUSIE IN EXISTING 133 STORAGE O2 O2 - E - - - STRIP JALOUSIE IN EXISTING 134 OFFICE O1 O1 O A A2/A-505 A2/A-50E AZ/A-505 135 OFFICE O1 0O A A2/A-505 A2/A-505 A2/A-505 136 OFFICE EXISTING A Al/A-505 Ai/A-505 Al/A-505 EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE SCREEN DOOR NOTES 137 OFFICE EXISTING A Al/A-505 Al/A-505 Al/A-505 EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE SCREEN 1. DOORS ARE ALL NEW ADD-3 ® WINDOW NOTES 5/2/16 138 MELTING ROOM EXISTING OPENING A AI/A-5Q5 A1/A-505 Al/A-505 METING WINDOW, REPLACE SCREEN 39 OFFICE 3'-1Y" 3'-0" 4'-2Yz° tll'-7" D - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WIDTH Gya� E d' �necr • e;".mn s �A�l v This work was prepared by me or under mysupervisgn d ill b t we under my andconstrud(onofthis projec,E,a,,,: r� - 1911 (- asozois DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF NAWAII 140 OFFICE f2--6" 2'-4" 4'-2Yz" f11'-7" D - - - VERIFY WIDTH 141 OFFICE 3'-lY" 3'-0" 4'-2Y2" T1l'-7" D - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WIDTH KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RENOVATION OF BUILDING B KILAUEA, HAWAII TMK: (4) 5-24.,OD6 42 PRINCIPAL 3'-1Y" 3'-D" 4'-2Yz" f11'-7" D - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WIDTH n vv �e1 NDOW NOTESyq 143 PRINCIPAL 3'-lY" 3'-U" 4'-2Y," T11'-7" D - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WIDTH O NEW WINDOWS. MATCH EXISTING IN ALL DETAILS AND SIZE. ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS SHALL HAVE DOUBLE STRENGTH GLASS TO MATCH EXISTING. SALVAGE AND REUSE SASH WEIGHTS. NEW TRANSOM WINDOWS 119, 139 - 146 SHALL HAVE 1#4" LAMINATED GLASS. WINDOWS SHALL BE SET IN EXISTING FRAMED OPENING. DOOR& WINDOW SCHEDULE&TYPES 144 PRINCIPAL 3'-1Yz" 3'-O" 4'-2Yz' t11'-7" D - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WIDTH MASON AMTTECTS. ING, Qgrgp�rq nr� A^6U1 45 PRINCIPAL 3'-1Yz" 3'-0" 4'-2Yz" T11'-7" D - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WfDTH a,q,�; Ec xX MARCH 2MI 34 c= 55 ,",� 146 PRINCIPAL 3'-lyz" 3'-0"�,�2)j- L11'-7° p - - - SASH WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR WIDTH s4mme �ye.umr wwftu ° As No En COLOR I MATERIAL SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER+PRODUCTIPATTERNiSTYLEICOLOR T - EXTERIOR (COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING) EXTERIOR BODY COLOR AND EAVES "NAV"O WHITE" DOORS, WINDOWS, SASH AND TRIM, "CHOCOLATE` RAILINGS, POST AND DECKING COLORS SHALL BE SELECTED FROM MANUFACTURERS STANDARD BY CONTRACTING OFFICE - FLOORING RESILIENT FLOOR TILE TARKETT OR EQUAL #1367 "SIERRA BEIGE' 12" X 12" TILE CERAMIC FLOOR TILE DAL -TILE OR EQUAL WINDMILL PATTERN *DK20, WITH #0175 "ELEMENTAL TAN SPECKLE" AS BODY, AND #D201 "URBAN PUTTY SPECKLE' AS DOT BASE AMERICAN OLEAN C•813 COVE BASE CB-613 INSIDE CORNERS GROUT LATICRETE 027 "HEMP" OR EQUAL WALLS CERAMIC TILE WALLS DALTILE OR EQUAL, MODERN DIMENSIONS SERIES 4Ya" x BYx" TILE SET IN RUNNING BOND COLOR: #D761 "MATTE URBAN PUTTY" GROUT LATICRETE #40 "LATTE" OR EQUAL n. cri erv. oawvin: eX of — 6E� DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF HAWAA KILAUEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PPO 0 ULL �xRE� # * RENOVATION OF BUILDING B y P' u5' 'ILAUEA, HAWAEE TMK: (4) 5-2-M.,006 COLOR & MATERIAL SCHEDULE This Work Was prepared by me or under my supervlsAn MASON ARCHITECTS, INC. and construction orthis prbosj�ect Y41I be under my ry ,V""�" 4973013078 pg,00¢1a A-602 er GM m GM ow.wim EC AS NOTED MARCH 2016 M ft� Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr. Mayor Wallace G. Rezentes, Jr. Managing Director November 7, 2016 Anne Schneider Lyle Tabata Acting County Engineer DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WO1kS -' 1 27 County of Kauai, State of Hawaii ``a 4444 Rice Street, Suite 275, Llhu`c, Hawaii 967W TEL (808) 241-4992 FAX (809) 241-6604 Kaua'i Historic Preservation Commission c/o County of Kauai Planning Department 4444 Rice Street, Suite A473 Lihu` e, HI 96766 Subject: National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation L-ihu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization District of Lxhu` e; Island of Kauai; Ahupua` a of Kalapaki Federal -Aid Project No. TGR 0700 (073) Tax Map Keys: See attached list Dear Anne Schneider, On behalf of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT), the County of Kauai Department of Public Works (CoK-DPW) would like to invite you to participate in Section 106 consultation for the Lihu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization project. The proposed project is located at: 1) `Eiwa. Street between Hardy Street and Rice Street; 2) Rice Street from approximately midblock west of Haleko Road to approximately mid -block beyond Ho`olako Street; 3) Kalena Street between Hardy Street and Ho`ala Street, and Ho`ala Street from Kalena Street to the Ltiu`e Court Townhomes entrance; 4) Ho `olako Street from Rice Street to Vidinha Stadium, 5) a shared use path alignment from the Civic Center to Kauai War Memorial Convention Hall (Convention Hall); and 6) Malae Street from Hardy Street to Puaolc Street, and Puaole Street from Malae Street to Ho`olako Street. This proposed project is a federally funded County project. It will be considered a federal action and undertaking, as defined by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended (2006). Therefore, the FHWA will require compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, NHPA, and other federal requirements. The FHWA has authorized the HDOT and the CoK-DPW to act on behalf of the FHWA regarding the N1 PA Section 106 notification and consultation. We would like to invite you to participate in Section 106 consultation for the proposed project in accordance with Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 900.3. An Equal Opportunity Employer 4 NO V 17 2016 National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Litiu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization November 7, 2016 Page 2 of 7 Overview of the Undertaking The project consists of six project components, which are described below and shown on the enclosed project components plan. 1. `Eiwa Street Transit Hub The `Eiwa Street transit hub includes a 10-foot wide pedestrian promenade, bus turnouts and shelters, one 10-foot wide travel lane, and two-way bike lanes. Planting and irrigation is included. The first phase (approximately 200 lineal feet) of the `Eiwa Street transit hub was completed as apart of the Hardy Street project. The remaining 500 lineal feet will be constructed as a part of this project. All of the proposed construction is within previously disturbed road right-of-way. 2. Rice Street The proposed Rice Street design extends from Haleko Road to approximately mid -block beyond Ho`olako Street, where Rice Street becomes a State road. The total length of Rice Street in the project area is approximately 4,600 feet. Proposed improvements include curb extensions at select locations, reconstruction of some driveways, lane reconfigurations (pavement striping), minor landscaping and site furnishings, small medians, bus shelters, signage and some drainage modifications. All of the proposed construction is in the previously disturbed and paved road right-of-way. 3. Ho`ala Street and Kalena Street Sidewalks The proposed project will construct approximately 2,000 lineal feet of sidewalk on Ho`ala and Kalena Streets. Proposed sidewalks (approximately 5 feet wide) will connect to recently constructed sidewalks along the frontage of Kaniko`o senior housing, and will complete sidewalks on Ho`ala Street from Kalena Street to the Uhu`e Court Townhomes entrance, and on Kalena Street from Rice Street to just past Ho`ala Street. All of the sidewalk work will be in previously disturbed right-of-way. Crosswalks will also be striped on existing pavement, and signs will be added at crosswalks. 4. Ho`olako Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities The project will construct an 8-foot wide sidewalk on one side and bike lanes on both sides of Ho`olako Street from Rice Street to Vidinha Stadium, approximately 2,300 feet in length. The project will include related intersection and crosswalk striping and signage. All of the work will be in previously disturbed right-of-way. 5. Civic Center to Convention Hall Shared Use Path The project will construct a concrete shared use path that will connect transit and other services at the Civic Center, the `Eiwa Street transit hub, Wilcox Elementary School, Lihu`e Ballfields, and Convention Hall/Creative Technology Center. The shared use path will allow for better parking management of existing parking resources at the Civic Center and Convention Hall. The shared use path is generally 10 feet wide. Along `Umi Street, the "path" will be a sidewalk widened to 8 feet with adjacent on -street bike lanes. The total path length from the Civic Center to Hardy Street is approximately 2,100 feet. The existing drainage swale at the Lihu`e Ballfields National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Lihu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization November 7, 2016 Page 3 of 7 and Convention Hall parking lot will be regraded, and culverts maybe added along portions of the drainage swale. 6. Puaole/Malae Bicycle Boulevard This project component consists of the addition of shared lane markings on the existing pavement and limited signage. All of the work will be on existing pavement or within disturbed right-of-way. Approximate construction depths All of the proposed work will be in previously disturbed rights -of -way. For the above project components, approximate construction depths are as follows: Sidewalks: 4-6 inch depth, with base material depth of 0-12 inches Curb and gutter: 6 inch depth with base material depth of 6-12 inches Bus shelters: No footings Irrigation: Trench depth of 12-24 inches Planting Areas: Soil preparation to a depth of 6-18 inches Signage: Post hammered into ground 3 feet deep, no footings Site furnishings: Surface mounted with anchor bolts, no footings Drainage facilities: To be determined Grading of shared use path: Depth from 0-4 feet New road pavement: depth of pavement and base 12-24 inches Road pavement repair: Match existing pavement depth Wayfinding and gateway Signage: Footing depth 0-4 feet; Lighting: maximum trench depth, 24' ; Footing depth, 3-6 feet; Final construction depths will be determined during preparation of final construction documents. Area of Potential Effects (APE) The project's Area of Potential Effects is approximately 102.4 acres and includes the following rights -of -way (ROW): Street Name Approximate ROW Length (in feet) Approximate Average ROW Width (in feet) 1. `Eiwa Street 500 50 2. Rice Street 4,600 56 3. Ho`ala Street/Kalena Street 2,000 30/38 4. Ho`olako Street 2,300 88 5, Civic Center to Convention Hall Shared Use Path 2,100 10-20 6. Puaole Street/Malae Street 2,200 40 Please refer to the enclosed APE location map. The proposed APE was reviewed with the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD). SHPD concurred with the APE on October 14, 2016 (SHPD Log No. 2016.02421; Doc. No. 1610AB04). National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Lzhu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization November 7, 2016 Page 4of7 Tax Map Keys A Tax Map Key list is attached and includes all TMK's within the proposed APE. Project construction is limited to the areas shown on the attached Project Component map. Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Background According to Lxhu `e Root and Branch of a Hawai `i Town by Pat L Griffin: "Its [Lihu`e Town's] origins are rooted in the early days of the sugar industry. Over time, this once obscure hamlet branched out to become the island's county seat, commercial core, and transport hub — the heart of Kaua`i..." "The heart of Kauai is young. Some towns may bustle on foundations as ancient as human life itself in Hawaii. Not so Lihu` e. The island's county seat is barely a century and a half old; no buildings within the central core of the town are known to predate the twentieth century. In ancient times ka po `e kahiko chose to live close to the rich ocean and along the lush valley streams in this part of the Puna District. For hundreds of years, even the trailways that traversed the island passed near Kilohana crater rather than through the land once known as Kalaiamea, the place we identify today as the Lihu`e plain... Humankind visited only sporadically..." While Lihu`e Town includes a historic district registered on both the National and State Registers of Historic Places, and several historic buildings, there is little known prehistoric -era archeological record within the APE due in part to the apparent lack of prehistoric human habitation noted above, and the severe grading and land modification that occurred through sugarcane plantation operations and construction of Lihu` e Town. Summary of Archaeological Sites within the APE The following documents were reviewed to determine what historic resources, if any, are known to occur within the APE. All of the sites listed are within the APE. Lahu `e Civic Center Site Improvements Master Plan Final Environmental Assessment, 2007 As noted in this Environmental Assessment: "By the early 1900's, Lihu`e Plantation and Grove Farm Plantation had established Lihu`e as a profitable sugarcane production area ... Ndwiliwili Harbor became the main port... and the Historic County Building was built in 1912, literally cementing Lillu`e as the civic seat of the island... Since then, the surroundings have changed dramatically, undergoing a series of transformations as a community and civic center have developed around it. Despite changes over time, there are still several historic buildings and a historic district within and near the Llhu`e Civic Center... The LThu`e Civic Center Historic District is listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places (Site Number 30-11-9351). It comprises all but the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Lihu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization November 7, 2016 Page 5 of'1 State Office Building ... The Historic County Building, built in 19121, and the County Annex Building, built in the 1930's, are included within this Historic District. The Historic District also encompasses the County Lawn and its double row of royal palms as well as the State Courthouse. Also listed on the State and National Registers ... is the Kauai Museum's Albert Spencer Wilcox Building (Site Number 30-11-9344). It was added.to the two lists in 1979. The Lihu`e Post Office, located across Rice Street from the Civic Center, was included on the National Register in 1989 and is listed as Site Number 30-11-9342... The entire site has been previously disturbed during historic and modern ground -altering activity..." Hardy Street Categorical Exclusion, July 26, 2012 The Section 106 consultation associated with this Categorical Exclusion identified two historic properties on Hardy Street: • A portion of Wilcox School constructed in 1958, and • The ILWU building at 4154 Hardy Street, also constructed in 1958 The Section 106 Determination was "No Adverse Effect." Final Environmental Assessment Kauai County Ho using Agency Affordable Housing for Rice Camp Parcels, August, 2013 This project is of relevance as it is adjacent to the proposed sidewalks on Hoala and Kalena Streets. Two historic -era sites were identified, an irrigation tunnel and a burial site, but both historic sites are to the west and outside of the proposed project area. An Archaeological Inventory Survey was also performed which found the following: "During subsurface testing, a total of 19 stratigraphic trenches of variable length and depth were excavated on the parcels... Testing predominately revealed homogenous silty clay strata. The parcels are the former location of Rice Camp, once occupied by migrant workers in the early 1990's. Given the vast amount of clearing on the parcels, cultural materials were likely below the surface. Only one historic element was identified to be an ink bottle... grubbing and grading of the parcel following camp occupation has removed almost all traces of the camp. It is presumed that when the parcel was cleared, surface cleared, suface and upper subsurface soils were bulldozed to the south, over a small adjacent slope that leads down to Nawiliwili Stream. Modern garbage and possible historic materials were mixed into the large silty clay matrix along the slope. That these lands were utilized for a lengthy duration for sugar cane also reflects the lack of cultural materials..." 1 According to the plaque on the building, the Historic County Building was constructed in 1913, and completed and dedicated in 1914. National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Lthu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization November 7, 2016 Page 6 of 7 Lzhu `e Root and Branch of a Hawai `i Town by Pat L. Griffin, 2014 Ms. Griffm's seminal book on Lihu`e describes the effect of the sugar plantation on the project area: "By the 1870's, little was evident of the wooded land Lee and Rice had described. Writing in Koamalu, Ethel Damon accused `two improvident generations' of having `literally devoured' the forests of Uhu`e... Those forests were destroyed to provide firewood for whaling, sugar boilers, and other industry ... but also cleared to plant crops and despoiled by introduced animals." In addition to historic properties described previously, several other buildings and structures are noted in Griff n's book: • A horse trough, purchased by Lihu` e Plantation president Hans Isenberg and his wife in Italy in 1909, and now located near the intersection of Rice Street and Haleko street. • The Lihu`e Shopping Center, now the Lihu` e Civic Center, designed by John Graham Jr., with its signature "round building". The first phase of the shopping center was completed in 1964. This was also the site of the Lihu`e Store. This concrete building from 1912 no longer exists. • The Bank ofHawai`i building, which has undergone many renovations. • The First National Bank building (now First Hawaiian Bank), and the Lihu`e Plantation Administration building, both constructed in the 1960's. • A series of Art Deco buildings in the commercial core on the site of the Rice Dairy, constructed in the 1930's and 1940's, including the following: — The Kress building — Kawakami Store (now Lee's furniture) — Royal Theater — Waimea Garage (now the Kauai Beer Company) — Filipino News building (now Masa's) • The Hale Nani Business Tract, encompassing the blocks defined by Rice, `Umi and `Ewalu Streets, and including the buildings currently occupied by Prosser Realty, Kiibo and Lihu`e Missionary Church • The Uhu`e Plaza Building at the corner of Rice and Streets. (Central Pacific Bank) • Several buildings located on the north side of Rice Street, including The Uhu`e Plaza building (at the corner of `Umi Street) The Motel Lani (at the corner of Hardy Street), Don's Camera and Fine Jewelry Center, and the TSA building • The Kauai War Memorial Convention Hall on Hardy Street, completed in 1964 Consultations A Section 106 notice/advertisement will be included in the Garden Island newspaper and the Honolulu Star -Advertiser. Native Hawaiian organizations and Native Hawaiian descendants with ancestral, lineal or cultural ties to, cultural knowledge or concerns for, and cultural or religious attachment to the proposed project area are asked to provide a response within 30 days of National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Li iu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization November 7, 2016 Page 7 of 7 notification. Section 106 consultation letters have been sent to the attached list of organizations and individuals. The Section 106 consultation notice and attachments will also be posted to the County's TIGER website at httpa/www.kauai.gov/Govermnent/Office-of-the-Mayor/TIGER- Grant. We welcome any comments you have on this project's proposed improvements. We are particularly interested in any information you may have on the historic and cultural sites that have been recorded in the area or any other historic or cultural sites about which you may have knowledge. In addition, if you are acquainted with any persons or organizations that are knowledgeable about the proposed project area, or any descendants with ancestral, lineal or cultural ties to or cultural knowledge or concerns for, and cultural or religious attachment to the proposed project area, we would appreciate receiving their names and contact information. We would appreciate a written response within 30 days from the date of this letter, to the County ofKaua`i Planning Department via email at pllankauai c,kauai.goy (include TIGER in the Subject line), or by US Postal Service to County of Kauai Planning Department, 4444 Rice St. Suite A 473, Lihue, HI 96766. The HDOT project manager for the subject project is Larry Dill and he can be contacted at (808) 241-3006, or by email at lawrence.j.dill Rwhawaii.goy . The County's project manager is Keith Suga and he can be contacted at (808) 241-4906, or by email at ksuga cr,kauai.gov. The County of Kauai Section 106 coordinator for this project is Lee Steinmetz and he can be contacted at (808) 241-4978, or by email at lsteirunetz@kauai.go_y_. Please feel free to contact any of them for additional information or if you have any questions. We look forward to working with you and the State Historic Preservation Division on these needed improvements. Sincerely, ing County Engineer Enclosures: APE map; Project Component map; TMK list; Consultation contact list cc: Larry Dill (HDOT); Keith Suga and Mike Dahilig (CoK); Kahaa Rezantes (FHWA) Lihu'e Town Core Mobility & Revitalization Area of Potential Effect (APE) Map If 0 250 500 Feet Registered Historic Places (National & State) Q APE TIGER PROJECT COMPONENTS 1.'Eiwa Street Transit Hub 2. Rice Street 3. Ho'ala/Kalena Sidewalk 4. Ho'olako Street Bicycle/ Pedestrian Improvements 5. Civic Center Shared Use Path 6. Pua'ole/Malae Bicycle Boulevard WEr .F 'ihu— r State , r Lis- 04fice'., �� 1. 1= Civic Bwid , Wilcox Elementary F !!l Center._ �r Schaoi- r Ue <� War Memorial ,, ' i>� Corwen tiona1 Hall JI vidinha; ,�. S#adium G Senior Housing-. U hu Court` Townhousesf- LIHU'E TOWN CORE MOBILITY & REVITALIZATION It] 0 250 500 Feet PROJECTS IN PROGRESS (No TIGER funding) A. Hardy Street B. 'Umi Street C. Haleko Street D. Ho'ala - Rice Shared Use Path -TIGER PROJECT COMPONENTS 1. 'Eiwa Street Transit Hub 2. Rice Street 3. Ho'ala/Kalena Sidewalk 4. Ho'olako Street Bicycle/ Pedestrian Improvements S. Civic Center Shared Use Path 6. Pua'ole/Maiae Bicycle Boulevard COKPLWO51815 Lihu`e Town Core Mobility and Revitalization Project Section 106 Consultation Contact List Abigail Spencer, AIA Honolulu Aha Kiole Kaua'i Aikane Alapa'i, Kaieie Foundation and Halau Palaihiwa o Kaepuuki Alicia K. Smith, Makawalu Foundation Alison Chiu, DOCOMOMO Anna Broverman, State Historical Preservation Division Anne Schneider, Kaua'i Historic Preservation Review Commission Antoinette K. Mallow, Hawaiian Civic Club of Hilo Barbara Say, Kaua'i Ni'ihau Island Burial Council Beverly Muraoka Blossom Feiteira, Association of Hawaiians for Homestead Lands Canen Hookano D. Kaliko Santos, Na Kuleana o Kanaka `Oiwi Dennis W. Ragsdale, Kingdom of Hawai'i Dennis W. Ragsdale, Order of Kamehameha I. Devin Forrest G.W. Naliko Kahualii Markel, Hawaiian Kingdom Dept. of Interior Gilbert and Lehua Kahele, Hawaiian Kingdom Hannah Reeves Hawley Iona, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Helen Wong- Smith, Kauai Historical Society Hope Kailai, Kilauea Neighborhood Association/ Malamamol Jane Gray, Kaua'i Museum Jeff Gilbreath, Hawaiian Community Assets, Inc. Kai Markell, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Kaiulani Edens, Hawai'i Private National Citizen Kamana`opono M. Crabbe, Ph.D., Office of Hawaiian Affairs Kauanoc M. Hoomanawanui, Historic Preservation Division Burial Sites Specialist Kawika Riley, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Kehaulani Kekua, Kaieie Foundation and Halau Palaihiwa o Kaepuuki Kehaunani Abad, Ph.D., Office of Hawaiian Affairs Keith Yap, Kaua'i Ni'ihau Island Burial Council Keola Lindsey Kiersten Faulkner, Historic Hawaii Foundation Kippen de Alba Chu, Friends of `Iolani Palace L. Laakea Suganuma, Royal Hawaiian Academy of Traditional Arts Leilani Kaleiohi Lisa Victor, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Lisa Watkins- Victorino, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Mahealani Cypher, Koolau Foundation Melvin Soong, the I Mua Group Miles Nishijima, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Mililni B. Trask, Na Koa Ikaika Ka Lahui Hawaii Nancy McMahon, County of Kaua'i Napali Woode, Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement Napali Woode, Native Hawaiian Economic Alliance Paige Kapiolani Barber, Nanakuli Housing Corporation Pat and Leah Pereira, Queen Deborah Kapule Hawaiian Civic Club Pat Griffin, L-lhu`e Business Association PiiIani Hanohano, Kamehameha Schools- Community Relations and Communications Group Puanani Rodgers, Hookipa Network Rayne Regush, Wailua Kapa`a Neighborhood Association Robin Puanani Danner, Sovereign Councils of the Hawaiian Homelands Assembly Rupert Rowe, Hui Malama o Kaneiolouma Sara Collins, Society for Hawaiian Archaeology Sharlene Chun-Lum, Papa Ola Lokahi Sophronia Noelani Josselin Susan Lebo, State Historical Preservation Division Sylvia M. Hussey, Native Hawaiian Education Council Sylvia Mahelani, Ni'ihau/Kaua'i Ahamoku Ahapuaa Taffi Wise, Kanu o ka `Aina Learning `Ohana (KALO) Valentine and Elizabeth Ako Waldeen K. Palmeira, Hui Na Makaiwa o Wailuanuiaho'ano Parcels, Uhu'e TC (APE) 093016 TMK TMK 1 436023003 2 436023004 3 436023005 4 436023006 5 436023007 6 436023008 7 436023009 8 436023010 9 436023011 10 436023012 11 436023013 12 436007021 13 436007023 14 436007024 15 436007027 16 436007028 17 436007029 18 436007031 19 436007032 20 436007033 21 436007034 22 436007035 23 436007036 24 436007038 25 436007040 26 436007043 27 436009001 28 436009008 29 436009010 30 436009011 31 436009012 32 436009013 33 436009025 34 436009026 35 436009027 36 436009028 37 436009029 38 436009030 39 436009031 40 436009032 41 436009033 42 436009D34 43 436009035 44436009036 861 436003070 871 436003073 88 436003074 89 436004009 90 436004013 91 436005001 436005002 436005003 r9594 436005005 436005006 96 436005010 971 436005011 98 436005018 99 436005019 100 436005020 101 436005021 102 436005024 103 436005027 104 436005028 105 436005030 106 436009014 107 436009015 108 436009016 109 436009017 1101 436009018 111 436009019 112 436009020 113 436009021 114 436009023 115 436009024 116 436018010 117 436018011 118 436018012 119 436019001 120 436019002 121 436019003 122 436019004 123 436019005 124 436019006 125 436019007 126 436019008 127 436019009 128 436019010 1291 436019011 45 436009038 46 436009039 47 436009040 48 436009041 49 436009042 50 436005009 51 436003017 52 436005008 53 436003061 54 436002003 55 436002005 56 436002009 57 436002010 58 436002011 59 436002019 60 436002021 61 436002022 62 436003001 63 436003010 64 436003012 65 436003013 66 436003014 67 436003015 68 436003018 69 436003019 70 436003020 71 436003021 72 436003022 73 436003023 74 436003026 75 436003047 76 4360D3046 77 436003048 78 436003049 79 436003050 80 436003058 81 436003062 82 436003063 83 436003064 84 436003065 85 436003066 130 436019012 131 436019013 132 436019014 133 436019015 1341 436019016 1351 436019017 1361 436019018 137 436019019 138 436019020 139 436019021 140 436019022 141 436019023 1421 436019024 143 436019025 144 436019026 145 436019027 146 436019028 1471 436019029 148 436019030 149 436019031 150 436019032 151 436019033 152 436019034 153 436020001 154 436020002 155 436020003 156 436020004 157 436020005 158 436020006 159 436020007 160 436020008 161 436020009 162 436020010 163 436020011 164 436020012 165 436020013 1661 436020014 167 436020015 169 436020016 169 436020017 170 436020018