HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly19,2018KHPRCAgendaPacketMEETING OF THE
KAUA'I COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION
THURSDAY, DULY 19, 2018
3:00 p.m. (or soon thereafter)
Llhu'e Civic Centex, Moikeha Building
MEETING ROOM #2A/2B
4444 Rice Street, Llhu'e, Kaua'i
AGENDA
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
D. APPROVAL OF THE JUNE 21, 2018 MINUTES
*18 A 12 M2 =5-
E. HEARINGS AND PUBLIC COMMENT - Individuals may orally testify on items on this
agenda during the Public Comment Period. Please call the Planning Department prior to
the meeting or notify Commission Staff at the meeting site. Testimony shall also be
accepted when the agenda item is taken up by the Commission. However if an individual
has already testified during this period, additional testimony at the agenda item testimony
may be allowed at the discretion of the Chair. Testifiers shall limit their testimony to
three (3) minutes, but may be extended longer at the discretion of the Chair. Written
testimony is also accepted. An original and twelve (12) copies of written testimony can
be hand delivered to the Planning Department or submitted to Commission Staff at the
meeting site.
F. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND GENERAL BUSINESS MATTERS
G. COMMUNICATIONS
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Kilohana Plantation (Wilcox Homestead)
TMK: 3-4-005-001, Llhu`e, Kauai
Proposed construction of a living room lanai.
a. Director's Report pertaining to this matter.
2. Discussion on the status of the Certified Local Government.
July 19, 2018 K.HT.R.C. Meeting Agenda
Page 2
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Memorandum of Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration and the
Hawaii State Historic Preservation Officer and the Hawaii Department of
Transportation Regarding the Oma`o Stream Bridge Replacement Project, Koloa
Ahupuaa, K61oa District, Kauai Island, Hawaii.
2. Child and Family Services
4-1112 Kuhi6 Highway, TMK: (4) 4.5-003:017, Kapa`a, Kauai
Installation of a concrete parking lot, addition of pavement for an ADA accessible
area, and enclosure of the existing porch/lanai for more storage or office space.
a. Director's Report pertaining to this matter.
J. COMMISSION EDUCATION COMMITTEE
K. KAUAI HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY UPDATE COMMITTEE
L. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PUBLICITY COMMITTEE
M. HANAPEPE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMMITTEE
N. SELECTION OF NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA TOPICS (August 16, 2018)
O. ADJOURNMENT
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Commission may go into an executive session on an agenda item for
one of the permitted purposes listed in Section 92-5(a) Hawaii Revised Statutes ("H.R.S."),
without noticing the executive session on the agenda where the executive session was not
anticipated in advance. HRS Section 92-7(a). The executive session may only be held,
however, upon an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members present, which must also
be the majority of the members to which the board is entitled. HRS Section 92-4. The
reason for holding the executive session shall be publicly announced.
Note: If you need an ASL Interpreter, materials in an alternate format, or other auxiliary
aid support, or an interpreter for a language other than English, please contact Lani Agoot
at (808) 241-4917 or lagoot@kauai.gov at least seven calendar days prior to the meeting.
Minutes
To
Follow.
Via Emal
(Hard copies will be provided at the meeting)
KA glimpse of Kauai's past...
June 18, 2018
Mr. James Guerber, Chair
Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission
c/o County of Kauai Planning Department
4444 Rice Street, Suite A473
Lihue, Hawaii 96766
Dear Chair Guerber:
We sincerely appreciate your putting Kilohana Plantation on your agenda for
June 21, 2018. The following are the reasons for Kilohana's request to build a patio
accessible from our main living room.
We signed a lease with the Gaylord & Carol Wilcox FLP at the the end of 1985 and
opened Kilohana Plantation to the general public in June of 1986. We have maintained
and operated Kilohana for over 31 years. In our lease, we are responsible for the
upkeep of the 16,000 sq. ft. main home, along with five other homes and two guest
cottages. In order to maintain these dwellings, we need to continually generate profit
from our shops, restaurant, luau and our plantation railway. Fortunately, our entities are
all producing net income, with the exception of our restaurant.
Up until 2011, Gaylord's was a leased entity and we received a percentage rent. At that
time, the restaurant called 22 North, was losing a substantial amount of money and it
was mutually decided upon that Kauai Kilohana Partners would acquire the restaurant to
ensure its continuation and attempt to turn it around. Kilohana changed the name back
to Gaylord's Restaurant and was able to control most of the losses. At this time,
Gaylord's is, at best, breaking even. Gaylord's biggest financial challenge is the increase
in wages, medical insurance and benefits. It is becoming progressively critical to increase
revenue in order to pay for the operations and maintenance of the buildings
alone. When we took over Gaylord's Restaurant, we made two changes that helped to
increase revenue.
4
IV
'JUL 19 2018
p i� . .
F-!1 t1 N t_
� , ci�St�
P.O. Box 3121, Lihue, Island of Kauai, Hawaii 96766 / (808) 245-5608
KAUAI HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION
JUNE 18, 2018
PAGE TWO
We added a Gazebo (the architect was Tim Bradley) to the exterior of the courtyard and
a working bar in the living room. Both have been extremely well received by our local
customers and our visitors. The living room is a very beautiful room, but people tended
to take a quick look inside and leave. Since the addition of the living room bar, people
have enjoy the ambience and music, and it has increased our liquor sales by 35%.
In order to commit to what is needed to make Gaylord's financially viable, we have come
to the realization that we need a larger area that could be used as a lounge and for
private parties. We've spent over a year working with our architect, Tim Bradley, to
create & design a space that would enhance the overall atmosphere of the living
room. Mr. Bradley created a roof line that complements the roof lines of the home. He
designed the interior of the patio roof to flow seamlessly from living room to
patio. We are very confident that the outcome of this addition will be one we can all be
proud of.
It's been over 26 years since Hurricane Iniki and Kilohana has many serious financial
issues to contend with when it comes to the main home and cottages. To redo the roof
of the main home and its two cottages, replace the flooring throughout the main home,
upgrade a 100-year old water system requires hundreds of thousands of dollars. This
addition would enable us to maintain this historic building. As the General Partner of
Kauai Kilohana Partners, it is also my responsibility to make sure our 160 employees
receive a pay cheek every two weeks and my partners get a return on their
investment. I have a similar responsibility to our tenants who, combined, represent over
175 additional employees.
Kilohana has grown up a lot since 1986. We have added a railroad, Luau, shops, tours,
etc. All have been done in good taste and well received. We would sincerely
appreciate your support in helping us to make Gaylord's Restaurant a viable entity on
Kauai. I sincerely Tool: forward to representing Kauai Kilohana Partners at our hearing on
June 21, 2018 and answering any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Fred Atkins
General Partner
Kauai Kilohana Partners
Sul- ,, ".:, In
ti
OAK -
el
E kk\
F
.. rr
.�t
y;
4
d
'k r
=1
t v ♦�
:'►'� 40 ,
If i .
r
l
r_
OHIO
s
A-
r! �
5 A i >ri`i'k•/FE i° �ErII�
r
1
T & M ARCHITECTURE, LLC. Phone: (808) 821-9727
P. O. BOX 797, KAPA,N, KAUAI, HI 96746 Fax: (808) 821-9726
June 20, 2018
Fred Atkins at Kilihana.
3-2087 Kaumualii Highway RE: Proposed Livingroom Lanai Addition.
Lihue, Hawaii 96766 Design Intent
Dear Fred:
The purpose of this le u.-er is to document the thought process which led to the design
decisions involved with the Lanai Addition.
With the current use of the Living Room of Kilohana having a bar and live music in the
evenings, it became apparent to you that more floor space was needed. The concept of
a covered lanai, accessed from the existing balcony doors was determined to be a
practical solution.
As the architect asked to help, we determined that the character of the 1935 design
should be maintained, but disturbed as little as posible. To this end, it was decided to
attached a new floor system to the living room foundation wall at the balconies for a
seamless circulation to the new outdoor space, but not connect the roof of the new to
the existing. The intent here was to allow for the future removal of the lanai addition
without causing any i-eparable damage to the existing elements.
The next set of decisions involved replicating the design details of the 1935 design into
the new construction. The curved exposed eave rafters, roof pitch and brick work
column bases were duplicated in the new structure. The result is a front elevation of the
whole of Kilohana having one more roof element, consistent with the existing, making
it appear as if the covered lanai had always been. there. The additional 1290 sq. ft. of
outdoor covered floor space is a visually small added element compared to the entire
1935 construction.
The 1935 building, when viewed from the right side (Northeast), is somewhat ackward
in appearance. The Livingroom wing has a Mansard style flat roof with an extremely
tall brick chimne attached to it to be tail enough to direct smoke away from the two
story section of the building beyond. In my opinion, the 26` high ridge of the proposed
lanai addition helps mitigate the existing imbalance of the massing of Kilohana.
I would go so far as to say that the addition has a positive impact on the existing
property and should not be considered a detached structure ((since the floors are
attached) subject to an increased setback.
Sincerel ,
Tim Bradley, Authorized Representative
T & M Architecture LLC.
SCHOOL
PLANTAIION RELDS
MAUAI COMMUNITY CCLLEGE
COFZAUA'1
CHAPTER [; MUA'I 001 EIIDl1 NG COD£
FAUV[ COUMY CODE 1"?. AS AhG24=
AR.T =6-D[ EM CODE
I_,3, 4 Wodetl�uiu av�Eas.NdDmVColeyetieaZ b�
9sum 12b.)Ad*F ed b=m d5o+P Cm�eral®Cc3 ACC]
8> Ib4A lael A.m nft ®LC
9ig-� D�= 9L„
1511r f�lC�l� INM/f
1
®®®�
4�
I on=GE
.
�
_KAUWUAUI HIGHWAY JlT� ------ ______ --— — — — — — — -----
A /.
YMCA LOCATION
�.
L ITT.
'�4G
Yansi>uR..EW4L
- NN�P1y:Z{
'
I
I
19
�2'" .Pulf�N
"m
IffiF4
�fy�.v GP
-
E
`y
Fw--�-
I
IT
LTb. I i
�
VI
, y
7� I •
JUL 1 9 201IL
L,
CYYi an'rf � a
a
r4
00
� 0
N
x �n
U
xR
H
m
x
to
lioMLon
4
Q I2 4
b V]
es
arc�c
P; cis 4
DATE REY. ISSUED FOR
MAt. MAbY
DRAWING NUMBEA
1
SHEET I OF
4
�
r
e�
Rx
f
1
I P j
INS
III e 1
kl I
f
I 1
m
b
i
o ProsedLivin Room Lanai for:
P
Gaylords at Kilohana
T & M ARCHITECTURE, LLC.
THI$wpRNWw51,rRVAAF°PrMF ��+M a
c°Hsrn°urnoH afi +sraoiEci a *�
ti RECISffRED C`
velFl If DeNFP MI $VffRvglpH, F
. 6VIEP VISION p1 COHSrRUCI'IOu FRDFFSSIOIVA[ .[
m
m
Ir
3-2087 Kaumualii Highway, Uhue, Kauai, Hawaii
P.D.BOX 797, KAPAA, KAUAI, HI 96746
TE OEIIHEO I EELTIOH I. IH Of ARCHIr[[E
ni eoLuo w°InofEsi'o sFO' s114
p
o
Tax Map Key (4th) 3-4-05:1
Phone: (808) 821-9727 Fax: (808) 821-9726
VfY00.50 °`"'Y� S Fw° Sul".
Michael A. Dahilig
Director of Planning
COUNTY OF KAUA'I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Ka`aina S. Hull
Deputy Director of Planning
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Kauai County Historic Preservation Review Commission
I. SUMMARY
Action Required by KHPRC: Consideration of the subject parcel and existing
historic structure for proposed living room lanai.
II. PROJECT DATA
PYt01 . O ?;41VI 'ION
Parcel Location:
LThu`e
Tax Map Key(s):
(4) 3-4-005:001
Area: 34.12 acres
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS & VALUES
Zoning:
Agriculture (A)
State Land Use District:
Agriculture
General Plan Designation:
Agricultural
Lessee:
Kauai Kilohana Partners
Owner(s):
Wilcox Family LTD Partnership
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND USE
BACKGROUND
The subject lot of record is located at 3-2087 Kaumuali`i Highway in LThu`e. The subject
lot of record is approximately 34.12 acres (1,486,267 sq ft) in size, and is located on the
boundary of Nawiliwili and Puali Ahupua'a, Puna Moku, Kauai Island, Hawaii. It is
located within the County of Kaua`i's Agriculture (A) Zoning District, State Land Use
Agriculture District, and General Plan Designation Agricultural.
The lot of record is located at the Kaumuali`i Highway and Nuhou Street intersection. The
adjacent lot to the southwest is the University of Hawaii Kauai Community College
campus, and to the north is Grove Farm property, The Kilohana Plantation is located in the
Puhi area.
4.0 1,Q-V
JUL 19 2010
TMK: (4) 3-4-005:001
June 21, 2018
Page 2 of 5
EXISTING STRUCTURES & PERMIT HISTORY
Based on the information gathered by the Planning Department, the subject building was
constructed circa 1935. The residence was originally built on the same site of the Albert
Wilcox home, for Gaylord Parke Wilcox (and Ethel Kulamanu Mahelona Wilcox),
successor to founder of Grove Farm Plantation, George Wilcox. The residence was
designed by architect Mark Potter, AIA, in the English country house style. The residence
encompasses nearly 30,000 sq ft and is two-story. Construction cost $75,000 — the most
expensive home built on Kauai at the time.
Kiloliana, also known as Wilcox Homestead, includes the Gaylord P. Wilcox House and
the associated cottage. The two buildings are listed on the Hawaii Register of Historic
Places as SIHP #30-11-9339.
IV. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS
Per The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with
Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings
(Revised 2017):
"A new exterior addition to a historic building should be considered in a
rehabilitation project only after determining that requirements for a new or
continuing use cannot be successfully met by altering non -significant interior
spaces. If the existing building cannot accommodate such requirements in this
way, then an exterior addition or, in some instances, separate new construction on
a site may be acceptable alternatives.
A new addition must preserve the building's historic character, form, significant
materials, and features. It must be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and
design of the historic building while differentiated from the historic building. It
should be designed and constructed so that the essential form and integrity of the
historic building would remain if the addition were to be removed in the future."
V. AGENCY COMMENTS
None.
VI. EVALUATION
In reviewing the proposed project site for historical significance, the following should be
considered:
The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Secretary of the Interior
Standards and Guidelines, and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) should
TMK: (4) 3-4-005:001
June 21, 2018
Page 3 of 5
be considered when evaluating a property's potential for designation as "historically
significant". The U.S. Department of the Interior's four National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP) Criteria for evaluation should also be considered to insure that the
County of Kauai remains consistent with national standards.
Criteria A. That are associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of our history;
Criteria B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past;
Criteria C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess
high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity
whose components may lack individual distinction;
Criteria D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in
history or prehistory.
2. Based on the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, completed by
Boone Morrison Architects, Inc. on July 12, 1993, the property was nominated based
on the applicability of National Register Criteria C — property embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a
master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable
entity whose components lack individual distinction. The area of significance is
"architecture", the style is classified as a "Tudor Revival with Pacific influences", and
the period of significance is circa 1935.
The proposed addition of the new living room lanai, as an attachment, is an alteration to
the existing historic building. The proposed attachment will result in a change to the
visual appearance, design, balance and proportion, and historic architectural character
of the existing listed building. Consequently, the addition may have a negative effect on
historic property. Mitigation measures and Secretary of Interior Standards and
Guidance should be applied to avoid permanent negative effects to the historic integrity
of the building.
4. The subject property is also subject to HRS 6E-10 review for concurrence or non -
concurrence with the Applicant's determination of effect on historic properties. Per
§6E-10(a) Privately owned historic property,
"Before any construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature,
by, for, or permitted by a private landowner may be commenced which will affect
an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall
TMK: (4) 3-4-005:001
June 21, 2018
Page 4 of 5
notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement
of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the
proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on
the historic property. The proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or
improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the event it has already
begun, continue, until the department shall have given its concurrence or ninety
days have elapsed."
5. Per Hawaii Revised Statutes §343-5(a)(4) Applicability and Requirements, "Except as
otherwise provided, an environmental assessment shall be required for actions that:...
(4) Propose any use within any historic site as designated in the National Register or
Hawaii Register, as provided for in the Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Public Law
89-665, or chapter 6E".
VII. CONCLUSION
Based on the information contained in the Report's Findings and Evaluation, the Planning
Department concludes that the proposed construction of the living room lanai may
negatively affect the historic aspects of integrity of the existing structure, with respect to
design, workmanship, and feeling.
VIII. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing evaluation and conclusion, the Planning Department recommends
that the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission SUPPORT the proposed
construction of the living room lanai, provided that the Applicant adheres to the following
conditions:
Applicant shall construct the proposed building as a "detached accessory building," and
adhere to the applicable requirements set forth in the County of Kauai Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Applicant shall be cognizant of the ten (10) feet minimum setback requirement between
the proposed detached accessory building and the existing historic building.
3. Prior to construction, Applicant shall submit the proposed scope of work, building
plans, building permit application (if applicable), photos, and 6E submittal form (under
"Forms" on SHPD website) to SHPD — Architecture Branch for review. Submittals may
be sent via email to DI.NR.lntake.SHPD(a),hawaii.yov, or mailed to State Historic
Preservation Division, 601 Kamokila Blvd. Suite 555, Kapolei, Hl 96707. Any
outstanding issues with SHPD shall be resolved with SHPD.
The Commission is further advised that this report does not represent the Planning
Department's final recommendation in view of the forthcoming public hearing process
TMK: (4) 3-4-005:001
June 21, 2018
Page 5 of 5
whereby the entire record should be considered prior to decision making. The entire record
includes but is not be limited to:
a. Government agency comments;
b. Testimony from the general public and interested others; and
c. The land owner's response.
By
ALEX WONY
Planner
Approved & Recommended to Commission:
By
KA`AINA 9. HULL
/Deputy Director of Planning
Date:
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG THE
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND THE
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
AND THE
HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING THE
OMAO STREAM BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OF OMAO STREAM BRIDGE
KOLOA AHUPUAA, KOLOA DISTRICT, KAUAI ISLAND''�Y, HAWAII
DATIBIune 4-9209, 2018
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) plans to provide assistance to the Project
pursuant to the Federal -aid Highway program as described in Title 23 USC § 101 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, FHWA has determined that the Project is an undertaking, as defined in 36 CFR § 800.16(y),
and thus is subject to review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16
USC § 470f and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR § 800; and
WHEREAS, the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) proposes to design and construct the Omao
Stream Bridge Replacement project (the Project), which consists of demolishing the Omao Stream Bridge
{Auuendix A} and constructing the replacement bridge in the same location as existing; and
WHEREAS, FHWA and HDOT have consulted with the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR § 800; and
WHEREAS, the HDOT participated in consultation, is the project proponent and applicant for federal
assistance, and is an invited signatory to this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA); and
WHEREAS, FHWA and HDOT have has -defined the undertaking's area of potential effect (APE) as an
18.7 acre area along Kaumaulii Highway, on the Island of Kauai, within the State of Hawaii and is further
defined in Appendix B to include staging areas and areas with temporary and permanent impacts; and
WHEREAS, FHWA has determined that the undertaking would have an adverse effect on Omao Stream
Bridge (identified in Appendix A), which is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places
(identified in the Haivati State Historic Bridge Inventory and Evaluation, prepared by Fung Associates,
Inc. for the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation, Highways Division, 2013), and has consulted
with the SHPO pursuant to 36 CFR § 800, the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 USC § 4700; and
t----- Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.01", Right: 0"
+----- Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.01"
Formatted: Indent: Left:-0,0111, Right: 0"
Commented [SALT]: Chosen not to participate in consultation
or chosen not to be invited signatories?
WHEREAS, FHWA and HDOT have consulted with local Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), further Formatted: Font: Not Itak
identified in Appendices C and D, for which historic properties within the APE may have religious or
cultural significance and has invited them to sign this MOA as invited signatories, and the invited NHOs Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
have chosen not to be invited si natorics i . Formatted: Left
---------g--------- --------------------------------------f
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
morandum of ream v cKauai ' Island. Ftaw ii Federal-Atd Pro' aNa. BR-O50-Il361
'JUG I q 2019
Memorandum
,
WHEREAS, FHWA and HDOT have consulted with the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission,
Historic Hawaii Foundation, and the community through public meetings as identified in Appendices E, F,
G, and H regarding the effects of the undertaking on historic properties and have invited them to sign this
MOA as a concurring party; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with 36 CFR § 800.6(a)(1), FHWA has notified the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP) of its adverse effect determination with specified documentation, and the
ACHP has chosen not to participate in the consultation pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.6(a)(1)(iii); and
NOW, THEREFORE, FHWA and the SHPO agree that the undertaking shall be implemented in
accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the undertaking on
historic properties.
STIPULATIONS
The FHWA shall ensure that the following measures are carried out:
I. DOCUMENTATION
iA The HDOT shall consult with the National Park Service
HABS/HAER/HALS (HHH) Coordinator in the Pacific West Regional Office as to the required type and
level of HHH documentation and on the guidelines and protocols for submission.
B. FFPVt RAL GE GY AJK, The HDOT shall ensure that all documentation a0trvities will be
performed or directly supervised by architects, historians, photographers and/or other professionals
meeting the minimum qualifications in their field as specified in the Secretary of Interior's Professional
Qualifications Standards (36 CFR 61 , Appendix A).
C. FUDERAa Q G "BR-n "Thc HDOT shall provide originals of all records resulting from
the documentation to the National Park Service.
D. Upon acceptance of the HHH documentation by NPS, >;>=PE "r "GE try "nnc,HDOT
shall provide the SHPO with the final HHH documentation and number-, and FEDERAL r A nor.rr+v
AB"HDOT shall submit the final HHH documentation to the SHPQ in digital format complete with a
State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP) request.
E. The HDOT shall complete the HHH documentation before the
start of construction,
Formatted: Indent: Left; 0", First line: 0"
Commented IYK1V21: Complete this section using this language
Formatted: Indent: First Ilne: 0"
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0", Numbered + Level: I +
Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: I + Alignment: Left +
Aligned at: 0" + Indent at: 0.25"
& Fi the Raeifk West Regional Office as to the fequired type and level of HHH documentation-afid an the
guidelines and preteee's for submission.
Memorandum or Agreement {MOAN for Resoluflon of Adverse Effects to the. Omao Stream Bridge Koloa Ahuuuaa. Koloa Dig ri Kauai
Island.Hawaii Federal -Aid Project No.BR-050-If301 •'
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
F. Jln_ addition, the HAER photos documentation for Omao Stream Bridge shall include two�r_.. Formatted: Font color: auto
nearby bridges— Lawai Stream and Waihohonu Stream Bridges— which are similar to Omao Stream Bridge Formatted: Font color: Auto
in original design and construction. Documentation of these two bridges shall be included as part of the Formatted: Font color: Auto
historic context for Omao Stream Bridge and shall be provided to SHPD for review and acceptance within Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering
six (6) weeks of completing the undertaking
Commented [OM(3]: Should this be included under Stipulation
& G. The HDOT shall update the Hmvaii Stare Historic Bridge Inventory and Evaluation 2013 Commented [MH4]: Concur.
to reflect the change in status of Omao Stream Bridge and shall provide the SHPO with a copy of the Formatted: Font color: Auto
inventory pages updated within six (6) weeks of completing the undertaking for review and acceptance. Formatted: Font color: Auto
Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering
F-. H. The HDOT Shall update the Hcnvaii State Historic Bridge Inventory and Evaluation (2013)------- iFormatted: Normal, No bullets or
to recommend that any future project that affects the existing historic railings of Lawai Stream Bridge shall
utilize new railings that match those at Omao Stream Bridge, due to similarities in original design and
construction. The HDOT shall provide the SHPO with a copy of the inventory pages updated within six (6)
weeks of completing the undertaking for review and acceptance.
II. PROJECT REVIEW
HDOT will provide the SHPO with 3914 and 6014 design subi ittslg a design narrative that clearly
summarizes how the for the replacement bridge to enstife its eempatibility is kgmpatible Nith the Lawai Commented [vKNs]: Was sot standards discussed? which
Stream and Waihohonu Stream Bridges for review and concurrence. The HDOT will ensure that the design °ne9
for the replacement bridge will be completed by or in collaboration with a professional who meets the Commented [AQ: Replacement bridge will be compatible with
Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (qualified professional) for Architecture or nearby Lawai and Waihohonu Bridges, using Sot Standards forRehabilitation: New Construction within the Boundaries of Historic
Historic Architecture. The SHPO will provide comments or concurrence with the design submittals within Properties as a guideline
thirty (30) calendar days of receipt. If the SHPO has not responded within the agreed upon time, HDOT Commented [RF7R6]: Thank you Alison!
and FHWA may assume the SHPO's concurrence and move forward to the next project stage.
HDOT will provide the consulting parties with 3086 and 60% design submittals for the replacement bridge
to ensure its compatibility with the Lawai Stream and Waihohonu Stream Bridges for review and comment.
The HDOT will ensure that the design for the replacement bridge will be completed by or in collaboration
with a professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (qualified
professional) for Architecture or Historic Architecture. Consulting parties will provide comments on the
design submittals within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.
A.
HDOT shall utilize the attached design of the existing bridge (Appendix A) as guidance for the
railings of the new bridge to fit within the context of neighboring bridges. HDOT shall ensure that
the design for the new railings will be completed by or in collaboration with a professional who
meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Architecture or
Historic Architecture. (Design of new railings and piers shall meet appropriate safety standards
while being compatible with historic character -defining features of the existing Omao Stream
Bridge, identified in the Hmvaii State Historic Bridge Inventory and Evaluation (2013), and as
follows: Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: a pt, Not Italic
Memorandum of Atuee:nent fMOAI for Resolution of Adverse Effects to then Om -au -Stream Badge. Koloa 4hMgua kjPlQJ Digji2i, K JMi-
Island Hawaii Federal -Aid Proiect No. BR-050-1f301 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
a. Geometric styling,
b. Concrete Open Arched railing type,
c. Distinct, flat concrete parapet cap
d. Three parapet segments with paneled intermediate posts defining each segment,
c. Wide end posts,
f- Bent pilasters shall be spaced similar to existing pilaster spacing, and
g. A double concrete pier configuration, with
h. Coffered super -structure and exposed structural support elements.
--------------
B. Changes in Project Scope
Commented[OM(S]: Has itbeen confirmed that this is
N•, feasible?
Commented [MF19]: Confirming that a crash -tested railing v 11
be used.
201 g-06-19 Yes, we are committed to incorporating all these design
In the event of any changes to the Project scope, the following measures shall be implemented in elements into our new bridge design
consultation with the signatories:
',J Commented [RFIOR91: Thanks Mike!
Commented [RFUR9]:
a.
HDOT and FHWA shall assess and -revise the Project APE as needed to incorporate any
additional areas that have the potential to affect historic �propertiedand shall notify
-__--
Commented [SAL12]: Should also rrotifyconsu!tingparties,
consulting parties of any proposed revisions, including potential identification o£additional
including NEW, to provide an opportunity for review and comment,
historic properties, for their review and comment prior to finalizing the revision.
including potential identification ofadditional historic properties
b.
HDOT and FHWA shall carry out additional investigations to identify historic architectural
and archaeological properties that may be affected.
c.
HDOT and FHWA shall assess the Project's effect on any )Ie -identified_historic
._- - Commented [SAL131:newly--identified
properties and explore measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate effects on these properties.
d.
HDOT and FHWA shall ensure the preparation of appropriate reports and documents,
notify Section 106 consulting parties, including NHOs, of any changes in the Project's
effect on historic properties, and provide an opportunity for review and comment.
e.
If a change in project scope results in additional adverse effects to historic properties,
HDOT and FHWA shall consult with all consulting parties to amend the MOA in
accordance with Stipulation V1I. Amendment.
III. DURATION
This MOA will expire if its terms are not carried out within five (5) years from the date of its execution.
Prior to such time, FHWA may consult with the other signatories to reconsider the terms of the MOA and
amend it in accordance with Stipulation VIE. Amendment.
IV. MONITORING AND REPORTING
Each year following the execution of this MOA until it expires or is terminated, HDOT shall draft a
summary report which SHWA shall provide to all parties to this MOA, a -summary FepeFFdetailing work Commented [oM(la]: HDOT shall draft the report and itwill
undertaken pursuant to its terms. Such report shall include any scheduling changes proposed, any problems be distnbuted througb FHWA
encountered, and any disputes and objections received in FHWA's efforts to carry out the terms of this Commented [M H15]: KAI Hawaii can include this effort as part
MOA, L ofoorPE-2contract
_
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Formatted: Font: 6 pt, Not Italic
V. POST -REVIEW DISCOVERIES & EMERGENCY SITUATIONS i, Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
A. Post Review Discoveries �s , , Formatted: Font: 8 ot, Not Italic
emorandum of A ecm - [ o m Brid K I Ah uaa Koloa Distil Kauai
v
Island. awaii Federal -Aid Project No.BR-050-1t301
k€The procedure to handle a discovery of a historic property, other than a burial site, during the
course of work on the project 0 Pis —Are d-JqGevered !hat way be signifisant OF if unanticipated effects
OR hiSt,..:.....ep ff.:aS are found, the >i'r'1r" Hj? shall FefeF tscomnly with HAR Chapter 13-280
"Rules Governing General Procedures for Inadvertent Discoveries of Historic Properties During a
Project Covered by the Historic Preservation Review IProcesi" _-
-----------------------
In the event that pfeyieusly unido..NAoA human skeletal remains are inadvertently discovered, sash
remains M be F. gated puff •ant any activity in the immediate area that could damage the remains
or the potential historic site shall cease until the requirements of HRc. ^�— mpW—6E43.6
Inadvertent discovery of burial sites) and HAR Chanter 13-300-40 (Rules of Practice and Procedure
Relating to Burial Sites and Human Remains) i3f the Hawaii Revised St have been met. aces
---------------------------------
B. Emergency Situations
Should an emergency situation occur which represents an imminent threat to public health or safety,
or creates a hazardous condition, HDO:�� `::� shall immediately notify the SHPD and the
ACHP of the condition which has initiated the situation and the measures taken to respond to the
emergency or hazardous condition, pursuant to 36 CFR §800.12. Should the SHPO or the ACHP
desire to provide technical assistance to HDOT*1.o 1.;;�r, they shall submit comments within
seven (7) calendar days from notification, if the nature of the emergency or hazardous condition
allows for such coordination.
VI. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Should any signatory or concurring party to this MOA object at any time to any actions proposed or the
manner in which the terms of this MOA are implemented, FHWA shall consult with such party to resolve
the objection. If FHWA determines that such objection cannot be resolved, FHWA will:
A. Forward all documentation relevant to the dispute, including the FHWA's proposed resolution, to
the ACHP. The ACHP shall provide FHWA with its advice on the resolution of the objection within
-]Commented [SAL16]: This pertains to 6H and the language
should reflect I MB0, don't paraphrase. This pertains to historic
properties, other than burial sites.
Commented [OM(17]: These seem to say the same thing?
FHWA would follow 36 CFR 800
Commented [MH 181: Searching through all previous versions
of the MOA4 it is not clear who added the paragraph that Meesa is
suggesting we delete. It is well documented that Meesa only wanted
the paragraphs currently included.
Commented [SAL14]: This should reference HRS 6E-43.6 and
HAR I3-300-40. Don't paraphrase.
Commented[OM(2Q]: FHWA isn't always aware ofhazardous
conditions. It should probably be HDOT
thirty (30) days of receiving adequate documentation. Prior to reaching a final decision on the
dispute, FHWA shall prepare a written response that takes into account any timely advice or
comments regarding the dispute from the ACHP, signatories, and concurring parties, and provide
them with a copy of this written response. FHWA will then proceed according to its final decision.
B. If the ACHP does not provide its advice regarding the dispute within the thirty (30) day time period,
FHWA may make a final decision on the dispute and proceed accordingly. Prior to reaching such Formatted: Font: B pt, Not Italic
a final decision, FHWA shall prepare a written response that takes into account any timely r, Formatted: Left
comments regarding the dispute from the signatories and concurring parties to the MOA, and - , Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
provide them and the ACHP with a copy of such written response. 1
Formatted: Font: 8 t, Not Italic
Memonurdum e�F, regiment tMOAI for Resolution of Adverse Efrecrs to the. Oman Stream Bridge, Koloa Ahuouea Koloa Disinct. Kauai
P
A. :.�
.,. ,
-------------
Island, Haw ii Federal -Aid Project No BR-050-1
C. FHWA's responsibilities to carry out all other actions subject to the terms of this MOA that are not
the subject of the dispute remain unchanged.
VII. AMENDMENTS
This MOA may be amended when such an amendment is agreed to in writing by all signatories. The
amendment will be effective on the date a copy is filed with the ACHP.
VIII. TERMINATION
If any signatory to this MOA determines that its terms will not or cannot be carried out, that party shall
immediately consult with the other signatories and concurring parties to attempt to develop an amendment
per Stipulation VII, Amendment, above. If within thirty (30) days (or another time period agreed to by all
signatories) an amendment cannot be reached, any signatory may terminate the MOA upon written
notification to the other signatories.
Once the MOA is terminated, and prior to work continuing on the undertaking, FHWA must either (a.)
execute an MOA pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.6, or (b.) request, take into account, and respond to the
comments of the ACHP under 36 CFR § 800.7. FHWA shall notify the signatories as to the course of action
it will pursue.
Execution of this MOA by the FHWA and SHPO and implementation of its terms evidence that FHWA
has taken into account the effects of this undertaking on historic properties and afforded the ACHP an
opportunity to comment on the Omao Stream Bridge Project, Federal -aid Project No. BR-050-1(030),
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
f Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
ure Memom dm9f Agement (MOA) for Resolution of Adverse Effects to then Omao_Symm Bridge, Koloa Ahupuaa, Koloa District, Kauai
hland. Hawaii Federal -Aid Pro1W No. BR-050-I f30J_
SIGNATORY PAGE
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING THE OMAO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,
KAUAI COUNTY, HAWAII
SIGNATORY:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Date
Ralph J. Rizzo. Division Administrator
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Memgrgndum o Acreement fMOAI for Resolution of Adverse Effects to the Omao Stream Bridge, Koloa Ahunuaa. Koloa District, Kauai t%(
_-- -------------- q- i ----
Island Hawaii Federal -Aid Project Na.BR-050-t 30__________________________________________________________________________�••
SIGNATORY PAGE
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING THE OMAO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,
KAUAI COUNTY, HAWAII
SIGNATORY:
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
Date
Alan S. Downer, Deputy SHPO
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Ital€c
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Memorandum of A .reement fMOA for Resolution -of Adverse Effects ro [ha Omao Stream Brid¢o. Kolaa Ahuouaa. Koloa Diatn�KaAai- +='
Island Hawaii Federal -Aid Proiect No.BR-050-IfJOI
INVITED SIGNATORY PAGE
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING THE OMAO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,
KAUAI COUNTY, HAWAII
INVITED SIGNATORY:
HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Date
Jade T. Butay, InteFim Director
Formatted: Font: S pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: S pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 8 pf, Not Italic
Memorandum of Aereement (MOA) f r Resoluti n of Adverse Effects to th Omaa Stream Bridge, Kol a Ahuovaa Koloe District Kauai
Island Hawaii Federal -Aid Project No,BR-O50-I(30�_
CONCURRING PARTY PAGE
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING THE OMAO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,
KAUAI COUNTY, HAWAII
141flaU/t 11 1111202 Jl IV IVF
KAUAI HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSION
Date
Victoria Wichman, Chair
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Ital€c
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 8 t, Not Italic
1Vlemorandum�,�.,.�f AereementfMOAl for Resolution of Adverse Et%c[s to [hq Omao Stream Bridge Koloa Ahuouaa Kolo pistrsc[ Kauai .....
{,.
Island. Hawaii Federal -Aid PmW No. BR-050-ii301
CONCURRING PARTY PAGE
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
HAWAII STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING THE OMAO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,
KAUAI COUNTY, HAWAII
CONCURRING PARTY:
lll..1[00[all ITAI%1IIT11601704$CO I
Date
Kiersten Faulkner, Executive Director
ARpendix A: --- Formatted: Centered
Site Photos
Appendix B:
Compiled Mays
Formatted: Centered
Formatted: Font, 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Mgqq&m pfAVAQWgnt WQN f rR l i n qfAqyAUSEMWmBri K I uQuti6 K l Di i i
Isiand.Hawaii Federal -Aid ProjectNc.BR-050-I(301--------------------------------------------------------------------------�,
Appendix C: t --- Formatted: Centered
Native Hawaiian Organization Consulted Parties
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
ffs, Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Memorandum of AarUmgnjfMQAS for Relglution of Adverse Effects to the, Omao Stream Bridge- Koloa AhuUuad- Koloa District Kauai
tsland.Hawaii Federal-AidProiectNo.BR-050-1(30]_____________________________________________
Appendix D: • ---- Formatted: centered
Representative NHQ Letter
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
1 Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
M;mgmdpm Pf AUUment (MOM for Resolution of Adverse Effects to theme Omao Stream Bridge Koloa Ahunuaa Koloa Disuict. Kauai _
Island.Hawaii Federal-AidPro'ect Nu.BR-050-lf301
Apendix E� •- Formatted: Centered
Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission Memorandum
Appendix F. - ----- Formatted: Centered
Historic Hawaii Foundation and State Historic �reservatA Division Commented [SAL21]: State Historic Preservation pivision
-------------------
Meeting Notes
Appendix G: •--- Formatted: centered
Community Consulted Parties
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
JJs' " Formatted: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
1"%"
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for Resolution of Adverse Slfkts to thr Oma,�,5tream Bride. Koloa Ahuouaa Koloa District. Kauai tH
Is1md.Ild5Yau Fed€ral-Aid Pioiest_No. SR-050-1 3300,1 _
Appendix H: w------ Formatted: Centered
Public Meeting NoLes, ---- Formatted: Font: 14 pt, Italic:
E
ed: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
ed: Left
ed: Font: 8 pt, Not Italic
ed: Fort: 8 pt, Not Italic
lvlemarandur of AMement (MOAI for Resolution of Adverse Effects to Oe 4mao Sveam eridne_ Kol�o,a Ah Ko] Distri Ka i t�
'T..Srkl oat 9.-_-P---W ------� .
Island Hawaii Federal -Aid Pfoiect No BR-050-lf301
COUNTY OF KAUAI
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4444 RICE STREET, SUITE A473
LIHUE, KAUAI, HAWAII 96766-1326
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 22, 2015
TO: Michael Hunnemann, Kai Hawaii Inc.
50 S. Beretania Street, #C-119C
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
FROM: 'k�D Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission
2��
SUBJECT: Kaumuali`i Highway Rehabilitation/Replacement of Oma`o Stream Bridge
Federal Aid Project No. BR-050-1(30)
This is to inform you that the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission (KHPRC) met on
April 2, 2015 to review and discuss your proposal for the Kaumuali`i Highway
Rehabilitation/Replacement of Oma`o Stream Bridge.
As stated in your letter of March 23, 2015, the project was previously reviewed by the KHPRC
on May 5, 2011 at the beginning stages of the Section 106 process. Based on the options
presented at that time, the KHPRC requested that the Applicant (Department of Transportation)
go back and discuss possible other alternatives that will increase safety for every traveler without
destroying the bridge. Conceptual design and cost estimates for the option of constructing a new
parallel bridge and retaining the existing bridge was presented to DOT for it consideration. The
purpose of the current presentation to the KHPRC is to present the preferred option by the DOT
which is to demolish the existing bridge and build a new bridge.
Based on the plans and testimony submitted to the Commission on April 2, 2015, the KHPRC
voted to recommend that a HAER Report be generated by the Department of Transportation for
the Omao Bridge prior to its demolition and reconstruction.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Mahalo.
cc: State Historic Preservation Division
State Highways Division, DOT -Kauai
1: . 1 .0
JUL 19 2018
VA2015 Master Piles\CommissionslKHPRCIRecomnmedations14-2-15omaobridge.docx
STRUCTURAL
Ken Hayashida, P.E. President
& FORENSIC
E N G I N E E R S Michael Hunnemann, P.E. Vice President
March 23, 2015
Michael Dahilig, Planning Director
County of Kauai Planning Department
4444 Rice Street, Suite 473
Uhue, Hawaii 96766
Attention: Mr. Myles Hironaka
Subject: KHPRC Meeting, April 2, 2015
Rehabilitation/Replacement of the Oinao Stream Bridge
Federal Aid Project No. BR-050-1(30)
Dear Mr. Dahilig,
KAI Hawaii, Inc. respectfully requests to be placed on the April 2, 2015 Kauai Historic
Preservation Review Commission (KHPRC) meeting agenda for the subject bridge project.
On May 5, 2011, we presented this same project to the Commission at the beginning stages
of the Section 106 process. Four options were presented to the Commission:
1. Do nothing
2. Widen the existing bridge utilizing a bypass bridge during construction
3. Widen the existing bridge without a bypass bridge
4. Demolition of the existing bridge and construct new bridge
The Commission requested that a 5`h option be considered which will include constructing a
new parallel bridge and retaining the existing bridge.
A conceptual design of the 5th option was completed and presented to HDOT for their
review. Estimated construction costs were prepared for all options and provided to HDOT
for their consideration.
The purpose of this presentation to KHPRC is to present the preferred option by HDOT,
which is to construct a new bridge. Attached please see a rendition of the proposed design.
APR 02 2015
50 S. Beretania Street, #C-119C I Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 1 Tel: (808) 533-2210 1 Fax: (808) 533-2686 1 Email: mail@kaihawaii.com
Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Michael Hunnemann
KAI Hawaii, Inc.
U
COUNTY OF KAUAI
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4444 RICE STREET, SUITE A473
LIHUE, KAUAI, HAWAII 96766-1326
(808)241-4050
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 24, 2011
TO: Michael Hunnemann, Vice President
Kai Hawaii Inc.
31 North Pauahi Street
Honolulu, HI 96817
FROM: 7 �Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission
/�qw
SUBJECT: Section 106 Review, Kaumuali`i Highway Rehabilitation/Replacement of
Oma`o Stream Bridge
This is to inform you that the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission (KHPRC) met on
May 5, 2011 to review and discuss your proposal for the Kaumuali`i Highway
Rehabilitation/Replacement of Oma`o Stream Bridge.
The KHPRC would like to thank the consultants and the Department of Transportation for
making the presentation of the proposed plans for the Kaumuali`i rehabilitation replacement of
Omao Stream Bridge. Based on the information and alternatives provided, the KHPRC
understands the need for traffic safety improvements but are reticent to look at replacement of
the defining characteristics of this bridge most notably the railings and piers and request that you
go back and -discuss possible other alternatives that will increase safety for every traveler without
destroying the bridge.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding this matter.
"iF1n
cc: State Historic Preservation Division
State Highways Division, DOT -Kauai
y DX
SIRUCT €1RAL & EORENSIC ENGINEERS
March 24, 2011
Michael Dahilig, Planning Director
County of Kaua' i Planning Department
4444 Rice Street, Suite 473
LThue, Hawai' i 96766
Ken K. Hayashida, P.E.
Michael P. Hunneinann, P.E.
Subject: Kaumuali'i Highway Rehabilitation/Replacement of'Oma'o Stream Bridge
(Federal Aid Project No. BR-050-1(30)), Ahupua'a ofKoloa,
Judicial District of Koloa
Dear Mr. Dahilig,
The purpose of this letter is to formally request the opportunity to make a presentation to the Kauai
Historic Preservation Review Commission (KHPRC) on May 5, 2011 regarding the above referenced
project. The presentation is proposed by the consultant team for the State of Hawaii, Department of
Transportation, Highways Division (HDOT) and fulfills a requirement of the Section 106 consultation
process. Through this consultation, we wish to receive recommendations from the KHPRC on the
proposed course of action.
HDOT proposes to replace or rehabilitate an existing bridge that crosses 'Oma'o Stream at Kaumuali'i
Highway (State Route 50). HDOT owns and operates the highway and bridge structure and is the lead
agency for this project.
The bridge is located immediately east of the community of 'Oma'o, approximately 1.5 miles west of the
junction of Kaumuali'i Highway and Maluhia Road (State Route 580). Land to the north (lnauka) and
east of the bridge is heavily forested and undeveloped. Land southwest of the bridge is developed with
single family dwellings that take access from Pune'e Road. These lands have all been subject to
Archaeological Inventory Survey (report pending).
The purpose of the project is to provide greater capacity and improved safety at 'Oma'o Stream Bridge.
The existing bridge deck is less than 28 feet wide and consists of two vehicle travel lanes and guard rails.
There are no shoulders or sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians or bicyclists.
The project was identified as a priority of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for
the fiscal years 2011 through 2014. The STIP categorizes the project as one that was identified on DOT's
Bridge Replacement Program and that addresses at least one Planning Factor from the Safe Accountable
Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU).
In addition to a "no action" alternative, three options for expanding the bridge capacity are currently
being evaluated by the consultant team. We would like the KHPRC to also evaluate these three options.
In summary, the alternatives include:
31 North Pauahi Street, Second Floor * Honolulu * Hawaii * 96817
Telephone: (808) 533-2210 * Facsimile: (808) 533-2686 * E-mail Address: mail@caihawaii.com
MAY 05 2011
Michael Dahilig
March 24, 2011
Page 2
Option 1— Do Nothing
Option 2 — Demolish Existing Bridge and Construct New Two Lane Bridge
This alternative includes the demolition of the existing bridge and construction of a new bridge. The
highway baseline for the new bridge will be the same as the existing bridge. The width of the new bridge
will be 47' and include (1) 12' wide travel lane in each direction, plus a 10' wide shoulder on each side of
the bridge. The shoulders will accommodate both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The new bridge will be
supported by new abutments and one new pier. A temporary bypass bridge would be constructed to allow
for unimpeded vehicle travel during project construction. The bypass bridge would be supported by
temporary abutments so that when the project is completed, the temporary bypass bridge and abutments
will be removed. The detour bridge will have a pedestrian walkway attached to one side of the temporary
bridge.
Option 3 — Expand Existing Bridge Deck with Temporary Detour Bridge
This alternative involves widening the existing bridge deck from 27'- 9" to 47' in width and will include
(1) 12' wide travel lane in each direction, plus a 10' wide shoulder on each side of the bridge. The
shoulders will accommodate both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. To accomplish this, both the upstream
and downstream sides of the bridge deck will be widened. Highway pavement will also be widened in
both the eastbound and westbound approaches to the bridge. Support for the widened deck would be
provided by extending the existing abutments and piers in both directions. A temporary bypass bridge
will be installed to accommodate vehicle travel during widening of the existing bridge deck. The
temporary bypass bridge will be constructed on the north (mauka) side of the existing structure. The
bypass bridge will be open for travel in both directions while the existing bridge deck is widened.
Support for the bypass bridge will be provided by temporary abutments that will be removed once the
improvements to the existing bridge are complete. The detour bridge will have a pedestrian walkway
attached to one side of the temporary bridge.
Option 4 — Expand Existing Bridge Deck without Temporary Detour Bridge
This option is similar to Option 3, except that no temporary detour bridge is proposed. To accomplish
this, the construction of the bridge will be conducted in phases, where the widening of one side of the
bridge will occur first, followed by the construction of the opposite side of the bridge. Traffic will be
diverted to the newly constructed side of the bridge while demolition and construction is conducted on the
opposite side. Two lanes of traffic will be open at all times.
Michael Dahilig
March 24, 2011
Page 3
Those in attendance at the KHPRC from the design team will include representatives from:
Project Lead/
Structural Engineer:
Historic/Archaeological/
Cultural Resources:
Civil Engineer:
Planning (EA):
KAI Hawaii
Michael Hunnemann
Scientific Consulting Services (SCS)
Michael Dega
Akinaka & Associates, LTD
Sheldon Yamasaki
Charles Jury
PBR HAWAII
Catie Cullison
The consultant team also includes a traffic engineering consultant (Austin Tsutsumi); electrical
engineering consultant (Ronald Ho & Associates); geotechnical engineering consultant (Hirata &
Associates, Inc.); landscape designer (PBR HAWAII); and, construction cost estimator (Joe Uno, Inc.).
Thank you for the opportunity to present information about this project to the KHPRC. Should you have
any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
unnemann signed by Michael
Michael Hum
DN: m=Michael Hunnemann,
email=mike@uEwii rom, o-KAI
Hunnemann
Hawaii, Inc., ou=Ergngineering, c=US
Date: 2011.04.29 0&52:00-10'00'
Michael Hunnemann
Vice President
KAI Hawaii, Inc.
31 North Pauahi Street
Honolulu, HI 96817
Z40Lu CAS BRECKENRIDGE & ASSOCIATES, INC
P0. 90.c 870)67aoea. Kauai, Harvel; 96754
Pf*w: 608.245.9154 • ErnaiT surveyorzecic@gmeif.oan • Web: w ..ksuaisurveywj.com
Darren R. Breckemidpe, PLS - Lucas Z Breckenridge, PLS - Mliam P. Sreaenndge, PLS
LGNO SYRVc,— - EW(1IM c.— - M—P— - GEOCET . C.---
PD. 12' PIPE
N 2,962.457
E 12,OT0.85'
NONOU�
zsr°3z'os• —
EP ® P
P
pop
O l
I HE
INM
z
ELECT SOX{TYP) -.
PROJECT No.: 18-027-001
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: APRIL 18, 2018
FOR: CPS Real Pmpeft Inc.
91-1841 Fort "b r Rd.
Era Beach, HI 96706
TAX MAP KEYNo.: (4th Division) 4-5-003:077
Fite Namc: 772078177 REAL PROPERTY. If
LOT 20
AC SHED
1- r,
jrii is
$UfLAfNG
fr.sv9.r,
LOT 99
11.244 $0, FT (F)
17,250 SO. FT. (R)
;Q
n
�x
A/C SHED
CONC. STAIRSEE
e=n
p�.[I
CONC. STAIRS
CONC. WALKWAY
f11+t,
,.e an,
CONC. RAMP
("..n
LONG. SLAB.•
CPS L C SURVEY DING
LEGEND:
a FOUND 1/2' PIPE (OR AS NOTED]
LOT 37
150.00'(R)
i50.06' (F)
CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYP.)
v�
441 O o
O
WOOD RAMP
(�:ra
LOT36
0
I
149.7i
150.00,09) FD. 112•PIPE J
LOT 16
MAP SHOWING
LOT COVERAGE ON
LOT 19
OF KAPAA TOWN LOTS, 2ND SERIES
HTS PLAN 3053
KAPAA, PUNA, KAUAI, HAWAII
0 20 4D 60
SCALE: 1"= 20'
LOT 35
Lucas Z. Breckenridge
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor
Lid No. LS-15956 Exp. Date 0413WO20
This work vas prepared by me
or under my supervision.
HASW ParaCtNIRE
(
HANALE)
DISTRICT
RMEE
IU1N
Dls�
Wi91MFA
DISTRICT
ia3,y4 IIHU'E
i_ DISTRICT
rr 7tLaa DIs 7CT
wR MVk
—`E PROJECT
LOCATION
ISLAND OFKAUAI: NOTTO SME
L LOKU
�x
U
O
V
44
VICINITY MAY: NOTTO SCALE
Notes.,
L Coordinates referred to Gavem avnf Survey Triangulation Station WONOU'z2
Win azimuths measured cfockwise from TRUE SOUTH.
2. The location, existence, size, depth, condition, capacity ofany drainage systems,
cesspool /septic tank system, sa"t-fine, and u57itylines on the properly is not
Part of this map. The appropriate gavemmental agency and/or urinfy agencies
should be contacted for this infarmah'on.
3. Ontyimprovemenrs shovm on this map have been field located (except as noted).
4. Map is based on monurrlenfs located in the field as shown on this map.
S. Slaveyorhas made rw investigative or indepentarlt search for easements of
recoro; encumbrances, resin ffve --nrs, c—mhlp title evidence, or any
other Facts that an accurate and current fidle search may disclose.
6. Lot Coverages Area:
Concrete Coverage (stairs, %valk Iks, slabs) = 795 s.f
budding Coverage {buildings porchs) = 1, 755 s./.
Deck Coverage (vmod ramp) 96 s.L
Toll Lot CoverageArea = 2,846 M.
SHEET OF
T •2 •
r31011 9 2018
2r272018
4-1112 Kuhio Hwy - Google Maps
https-th v,google.wmlmaps/@22.0691146,-159.3194816,3a,37.5y,60.55h,102.99Vdata=!3m6!1e1±3m4!1sGfbVb8rC3141jWW5NC7gEQ!2e0.7i13312!8f6656 A*^
Image capture: Mar 2012 0 2018 Google
213
Sur er Kin _ 1
9 4 "k1 r _ Kapaa I wS rlth-day
i '`i. r c. - AdventistChurch °-
lKahili Adventist School n
0
/^
` •.^; :G o • '�. �r,aRC/ # as Sn;eiar�- .'�• - >` �� - .i. � - s- t-t---1 -'�- `
lap _ +■+' � "OhaPaS 1326L _
- r
'Farlas M.
In
_
A
. •' ; ' Kapaa Shoppmg SeNer .--.. • i _ ' , , ; -- (. __ .
s 41112 Kuhio Highway _
_t _
yl 4
-N,
r� ) y � Kapaa Shi Pnci,B�,--
Storag 1pS'
Verde*-
Wa`vra:ian Bliza.aidip� � _ ` � -SY`�' 1; •r L ; -.
PacificSeri�cc.+"'r - -.r •"-j
u 1 &lDe`velopment - o• t
41
_ ig ar
esters nion i %La] l"--- r�,} J _ _ Y ?. -�:13 _
' 4 GOO le YPa� hiVRt7-
�-3. 9 � .- • Pan hi Rd
� "=Win'-�X"
HAL-e HO-CMAJU MOJ�G-r | § ��
A5-OUILT i
-4-1112 WHO KW. 7 12
� d�\
KAFAk KALW. =1 mll i - i, ; ii i I
§Em § $�§; k\pi 4 q4 � (D % ., I � I I "
'rMK; ( 4) 4-%-C - Phi,
il� 10 '. A 4, G ` N
anw.M rl
r..
40
w rwd r.F[uxtl
3. Enclose area for more
storage or office space.
1!IA
2. Add pavement for ADA
area
1. Parking: place concrete,
parking stalls that are marked.
t
Michael A. Dahilig
Director of Planning
COUNTY OF KAUA`I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Ka`aina S. Hull
Deputy Director of Planning
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Kauai County Historic Preservation Review Commission
1. SUMMARY
Action Required by KHPRC: Consideration of the subject parcel for the
installation of a concrete parking lot, addition of
pavement for an ADA accessible area, and
enclosure of the existing porch/lanai for more
storage or office space.
II. PROJECT DATA
PROJECT INFORAMTION
Parcel Location:
Kapa`a
Tax Map Key(s):
(4) 4-5-003:017
Area:
111,250 sq ft
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS & VALUES
Zoning:
R-20 (Residential)
State Land Use District:
Urban
General Plan Designation:
Neighborhood Center
Lessee:
NIA
Owner(s):
CFS Real Property Inc
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND USE
BACKGROUND
The subject lot of record is located at 4-1112 Kuhio Highway in Kapa`a. The subject lot of
record is approximately 11,250 sq ft in size, and is located in Kapa`a Ahupua'a, Puna
Moku, Kauai Island, Hawaii. It is located within the County of Kauai's Residential (R-
20) Zoning District, State Land Use Urban District, and General Plan Designation
Neighborhood Center.
The lot of record is located directly across the highway from the Kapa`a Shopping Center,
on the same block as the Kapa`a Seventh -day Adventist Church.
T�'q'A'
�JuL 19 2018
TMK: (4) 4-5-003-017
July 19, 2018
Page 2 of 4
EXISTING STRUCTURES & PERMIT HISTORY
According to County of Kauai Real Property Assessment records, the subject building was
constructed circa 1936. The 1,480 sq ft, 4 bedroom/l bathroom structure was apparently
built with the original intended design for residential use. Although the structure is well
over 50 years old, it is not listed on either the National Register of Historic Places or the
Hawaii Register of Historic Places. Furthermore, this property is not listed on the County
of Kauai Planning Department's inventory list of historic properties.
Below is a list of the recorded permit history:
1. Permit No. Z-IV-2002-19 and U-2002-14 — Change of use to "Outreach & Support
Family Services". Approved on March 28, 2002.
Applicant: Child & Family Service on February 13, 2002.
2. Permit No. Z-232-2012 — Demolition of garage and storage.
Applicant: CFS Real Property Inc. on October 27, 2011.
3. Permit No. Z-607-2012 — Accessory Use; construction of an ADA ramp.
Applicant: Matt Hamai for CFS Real Property Inc. on May 14, 2012.
IV. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS
None,
V. AGENCY COMMENTS
None.
VI. EVALUATION
In reviewing the proposed project site for historical significance, the following should be
considered:
I. The U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service, Secretary of the Interior
Standards and Guidelines, and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) should
be considered when evaluating a property's potential for designation as "historically
significant". The U.S. Department of the Interior's four National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP) Criteria for evaluation should also be considered to insure that the
County of Kauai remains consistent with national standards.
TMK: (4) 4-5-003-017
July 19, 2018
Page 3 of 4
Criteria A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to
the broad patterns of our history;
Based on the information on record at Real Property Assessment and the Planning
Department, this property and structure are not directly associated with any single
event or historic trend, and therefore this property does not meet National Register
Criteria A.
Criteria B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past;
Based on the information on record at Real Property Assessment and the Planning
Department, the existing structure and the property itself cannot be directly linked
to any specific, distinguished local residents who have contributed greatly to the
history of Kauai, Hawaii, and the United States. Therefore, this property does not
meet National Register Criteria B.
Criteria C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of
construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values,
or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack
individual distinction;
• Based on the information on record at Real Property Assessment and the Planning
Department, the existing structure has undergone multiple renovations and at no
point in time did the building meet the requirements to qualify for Criteria C.
Criteria D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in
history or prehistory.
• Based on the information gathered by the Planning Department, it is unlikely that
this structure, as it stands today, will yield information important in history or
prehistory. Therefore, this property does not meet National Register Criteria D.
VIL CONCLUSION
Based on the information contained in the Report's Findings and Evaluation, the Planning
Department concludes that the subject building is not historically significant, and therefore
a no adverse effect to historic properties determination is justified.
VIII. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing evaluation and conclusion, the Planning Department recommends
that the Kauai Historic Preservation Review Commission SUPPORT the proposed
construction of the concrete parking lot, ADA access area, and enclosure of the existing
TMK: (4) 4-5-003-017
July 19, 2018
Page 4 of 4
porch for additional storage or office space.
The Commission is further advised that this report does not represent the Planning
Department's final recommendation in view of the forthcoming public hearing process
whereby the entire record should be considered prior to decision making. The entire record
includes but is not be limited to:
a. Government agency comments;
b. Testimony from the general public and interested others; and
c. The land owner's response.
By
ALEX WKNY
Planner
Approved & Recommended to Commission:
By
KA`AINA 9. AULL
Deputy Director of Planning
Date: r `