HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/06/2016 Public hearing transcript on RES#2016-48 D1 PUBLIC HEARING
JULY 6, 2016
A public hearing of the Council of the County of Kaua`i was called to order by
Mel Rapozo, Chair, Committee of the Whole, on Wednesday, July 6, 2016, at
1:31 p.m., at the Council Chambers, 4396 Rice Street, Suite 201, Historic County
Building, Lihu`e, and the presence of the following was noted:
Honorable Mason K. Chock
Honorable Gary L. Hooser
Honorable Ross Kagawa
Honorable Arryl Kaneshiro
Honorable KipuKai Kuali`i
Honorable JoAnn A. Yukimura
Honorable Mel Rapozo
The Clerk read the notice of the public hearing on the following:
"Resolution No. 2016-48, Draft 1 — RESOLUTION PROPOSING A
CHARTER AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH A COUNTY ROADS
RESURFACING /RECONSTRUCTION BACKLOG FUND,"
which was ordered to print by the Council of the County of Kaua`i on June 15, 2016,
and published in The Garden Island newspaper on June 24, 2016.
The following communications were received for the record:
1. Mickens, Glenn, dated July 6, 2016
2. Nakanelua, Dayton from United Public Workers (UPW), AFSCME,
Local 646 and AFL-CIO, dated June 30, 2016
The hearing proceeded as follows:
SCOTT K. SATO, Deputy County Clerk: We received one (1) written
testimony in support from Glenn Mickens, one (1) in opposition from United Public
Workers (UPW), and we have one (1) registered speaker. The first speaker is Glenn
Mickens.
Council Chair Rapozo: Mr. Mickens.
GLENN MICKENS: For the record, Glenn Mickens. Thank you,
Council Chair Rapozo. I read this whole Resolution, but I am not sure I am one
hundred percent (100%) positive about what it says and does not say, but let me go
over my testimony. I guess you cannot correct me, but I tried. Basically, I believe
the concept of Resolution No. 2016-48, Draft 1 is very good, much needed, and I thank
Councilmember Kuali`i for introducing it. The Resolution states, "the council shall
appropriate a minimum of one percent (1%) of the annual certified real property tax
revenues and a minimum of six percent (6%) of the annual transient accommodations
tax revenues to a fund known as the County Roads Resurfacing / Reconstruction
PUBLIC HEARING 2 JULY 6, 2016
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-48, DRAFT 1
Backlog Fund." The money will be used to address resurfacing, repairs, or
reconstruction of County roads. "At any given time, no more than one percent (1%)
of this fund shall be used for administrative expenses. Any balance remaining in this
fund at the end of any fiscal year shall not lapse, but shall remain in the fund,
accumulating from year to year, for a period of 20 years from the establishment of
this fund." I believe that there should be added wording saying that all moneys
collected from the one percent (1%) property tax, the six percent (6%) Transient
Accommodations Tax (TAT), and I would hope that the fuel and weight tax are
included with these two (2), would be put in a "lock box" not be used for any other
purpose than those listed above, that for no other reason than these, can the money
be taken, used, or borrowed.
If I understand this Resolution correctly, under Section 3(D) it says, "The
allotment herein provided may be altered at any time by the mayor. The mayor shall
direct appropriate revisions in allotments to keep expenditures within the revenues
received or anticipated." If this means that the fund can by altered by the Mayor for
any other purpose other than roads resurfacing, then I would not support this
Resolution. Section 3(F) also says, "The mayor may at any time transfer an
unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof within a division or between
divisions in the same department." Again, if the wording says that money can only
be used to address resurfacing, repairs, or reconstruction, then no other language is
needed. Also, since these funds are coming from sources that were intended before
the above Resolution, then replacement funds may well require additional taxation.
In other words, the money has to come from someplace. How is that going to be unless
you tax somebody else again? Wording needs to be in the Resolution stating that
strict compliance to paving practices (American Association of Highway
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) or Hawai`i Asphalt Paving industry (HAPI))
must be adhered to—seeing that trucks have proper tonnage of asphalt concrete (AC)
when loaded and proper amounts are put down with an inspector present at the site
as Larry Dill was doing, and only those roads that are the heaviest traveled and in
the worst conditions are done on a prioritized basis and not for political reasons. Can
I finish? I do not have much more.
Council Chair Rapozo: Hold on real quick. Is there anyone else
wishing to testify? Is that the last paragraph that you have?
Mr. Mickens: Yes, you have it there.
Council Chair Rapozo: Just finish it up then.
Mr. Mickens: Okay. Again, this Resolution has the
makings of something badly needed, but let us not "ready, fire, aim" before it is
properly worded and given to the people to vote on. It should also have a monetary
breakdown of how much money will be brought in from the sources mentioned above
so that people will know how much is going to our roads.
Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you.
Mr. Mickens: Thank you, Council Chair Rapozo.
Council Chair Rapozo: Mr. Hart.
PUBLIC HEARING 3 JULY 6, 2016
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-48, DRAFT 1
BRUCE HART: For the record, Bruce Hart. I am really glad
Glenn was here because he addressed almost every concern that I had. What I would
really like to say is I just want to commend Councilmember Kuali`i for introducing
this. I want to commend the whole Council and encourage you to be proactive. We
killed the General Excise and Use Surcharge Tax (GET) and I think that is what we
should have done, but we have not stopped or just said "Well, now we are going to do
nothing." The roads do need to be repaired and I think that this is a really good option
for doing that. Again, I am just encouraging you all to continue to work on it until
you have it tight, all of the concerns are addressed, and I hope it passes. Thank you.
Council Chair Rapozo: Anyone else wishing to testify? Glenn, please
come up.
Mr. Mickens: Thank you, Council Chair Rapozo. Just
briefly, as an example of what I was talking about, these funds should have to be in
a lock box. For example, look at the social security fund. There has been enough
money put in that social security fund for the last one hundred (100) years or more
and yet we put a big pile of money in there, people borrow it, put an "I owe you" in it,
and it never gets paid back. So now we are hurting, right? We say, "We only have
enough money for four (4) or five (5) years to pay it back." In this Resolution, let us
see that the money gets put in there, but it cannot go anywhere else. Our roads and
traffic are what people are screaming about. Have the money in the fund stay there,
turn it over where it keeps on paying for itself, and any money that is not used goes
back into the fund. Again, we just keep putting funds in a thing or the Mayor can
take it across the street, and we give him the funds to use for something whatever
his project happens to be. He can use it for anything I presume. I think it is in the
Charter. It is legal. He can do it. It is not right. If the money is appropriated for
something, it should be used for that and only that. Thank you, Council Chair
Rapozo.
Council Chair Rapozo: Anyone else wishing to testify? If not, the
public hearing is now closed.
There no further testimony, the public hearing adjourned at 1:39 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
SC TT K. SATO
Deputy County Clerk
:aa