Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2nd Addition PDF FINAL Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F 1 County of Kauai Planning Commission 4444 Rice Street, Suite A473, Lihue, Hawaii, 96766 planningdepartment@kauai.gov December 7, 2020 Testimony Regarding Agenda Item I. Remand from the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit regarding Laura Bancroft Living Trust, et al. vs. Planning Commission of the County of Kauai.et al., Civil No.17-1-0029 JKW and receipt of the Fifth Circuit’s Final Judgement and Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order directing the Planning Commission to direct the Planning Department to process the Bancroft’s Application or a non-conforming use certificate pursuant to the Decision and Order. Aloha Planning Commission Chair Glenda Nogami-Streufert, Donna Apisa, Vice Chair and Commissioners and Planning Director Kaaina Hull, 1. Contradictions in the testimony: On remand to the Planning Director, please consider the testimony in Civil No.17-1-0029 JKW before the Honorable Judge Watanabe by the Bancroft’s which is in direct conflict with the County of Kauai Real Property Division records. A copy of the Bancroft’s records was obtained under a Request to Access a Government Record filed on September 10, 2020 which show the Bancroft’s claimed a Home Exemption and the Homestead Overclass from 2005-2012. Exhibit A, County of Kauai Finance Department Real Property Division records for TMK 5-8-011:010. These records are new contradictory evidence that show the property was used as a primary residence. David and Laura Bancroft returned a signed survey 5/3/2012 from the County RP Division indicating that the actual use of the house is a “primary residency with additional short term rental use.” Exhibit B, County of Kauai Finance Department Real Property Division Survey for TMK 5-8-011:010. In 2013, 2014 and 2015 the Bancroft’s still benefitted from the Home Exemption. Only after 2016 did the Bancroft’s pay vacation rental rates and not claim the Home Exemption. The Real Property records conflict with the statements made by the Bancroft’s. Here are the contradictory Findings of Facts the Bancroft’s have testified to in Civil No.17-1-0029 JKW (Agency Appeal.) and the Tax Status Timeline. 2 3 4 5 In consideration of following the directives of Judge Watanabe’s Decision and Order, the following information may be helpful. Process does not mean grant, the Decision specified: TVR Ordinance No. 864 was approved March 7, 2008, the effective date to obtain a non- conforming use certificate was March 30, 2009. TVR Ordinance No. 876 amended Ord. No. 864 January 24, 2009 (before any NCU approvals were given by the Planning Department.) This application is being “processed” under the provisions of Ord. 876. See Exhibit C, Ordinance No. 876 the pertinent provisions include: Before the Planning Director considers approval of the Bancroft application, at the minimum Ordinance 876 requires: 1. The Applicant must provide a sworn affidavit. 2. No non-conforming use certificate shall be issued without a physical inspection. 3. The Planning Director shall make available to the public at the Planning Department counter and on the County of Kaua'i website the completed application. 4. That non-conforming use certificates be given only to Single Family Transient Vacation Rentals, Multi Family Transient Vacation Rentals were not permitted and thus were not given non-conforming use certificates. 5. Providing false or misleading information on the application or in any information relating thereto at any time during the application process shall be grounds for revocation or cease and desist orders. 6 Additionally, Special Management Area (SMA) This development is in the SMA and should be required to apply for an SMA permit. The Application must properly evaluate the impacts consistent with the Special Management Area Rules and Regulations as this development increases the intensity of use resulting in cumulative impacts within the SMA area. An increase in the intensity of use in Wainiha impacts the safety of residents and visitors within the tsunami evacuation zone. Additionally, the change in the density and intensity of use of land results in cumulative impacts of which there is a significant environmental and ecological effect on the Special Management. Multi Family Vacation Rental: The Bancroft’s should not be given a Non-conforming use certificate as the Bancroft’s have been advertising and operating as a Multi Family Vacation Rental which never was a legal use under the CZO. Blaine Kobayashi’s opinion only applied to single family vacation rentals. See Exhibit E, Deputy County Attorney Blaine Kobayashi Opinion. The property is not a Single-Family Vacation Rental, as it is routinely advertised and rented to groups of 14 and16. A collection of advertisements is attached as Exhibit F. Advertisements including those on Airbnb advertising the units to accommodate 16, 14,10 and 4 people on 10/18/17,11/2/17,11/25/17 and 9/23/ 2020. The comments in the advertisements show the units to be rented independent of one another and are worth reading. The Bancroft’s routinely advertise 6- 7 different advertisements at the same time on Airbnb with multiple configurations of the units. This is a Multi-Family Transient Vacation Rental and should not be approved. Caren Diamond P.O. Box 536 Hanalei, HI. 96714 Kaimanacd22@yahoo.com 7 Area. Screenshots of advertisements advertising sleeps 16, 14 and 4: 8 9 nce