Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/13/2017-12/15/2017 Special Planning Committee minutes re Bill#2666 (General Plan Update), NOTE: 12/15/2017 meeting was canceled
SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES ON BILL#2666 (GENERAL PLAN UPDATE) 12/13/2017-12/15/2017 (Note: 12/15/2017 Special Planning Committee Meeting was canceled) 12/13/201.7 SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES ON BILL#2666 (GENERAL PLAN UPDATE) MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE December 13-14, 2017 A meeting of the Special Planning Committee of the County of Kaua`i, State of Hawai`i, was called to order by Mason K. Chock, Chair, at the Council Chambers, 4396 Rice Street, Suite 201, Lihu`e, Kaua`i, on Wednesday, December 13, 2017, at 11:32 a.m., after which the following Members answered the call of the roll: Honorable Arthur Brun Honorable Mason K. Chock Honorable Ross Kagawa (left at 4:08 p.m.) Honorable Derek S.K. Kawakami Honorable JoAnn A. Yukimura Honorable Arryl Kaneshiro Honorable Mel Rapozo The Committee proceeded on its agenda item as follows: Bill No. 2666 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 1, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE UPDATE OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF KAUAI (ZA-2017-3) (This item was Deferred to the January 25, ' Special Planning Committee Meeting.) 21E4g Committee Chair Chock: Aloha mai kakou. I would like to call to order the Special Planning Committee Meeting scheduled for December 13, 14, and 15. Please note that we have a quorum. At this time, I would like to take a personal privilege and ask us to start off the right way. Mehana will be doing an oli for us. Mahalo nui. We have the best amendments coming forward because of it. MEHANA BLAICH VAUGHAN: Aloha mai kakou. We just asked Planning Committee Chair Chock if we could start with an oli today, largely to say thank you. This General Plan process is so important for our island. Just in meeting with all of our Councilmembers, we have been really grateful for all of the time that each of you are putting into this process. Whether you are a long-time Councilmember who has been around the block a few times or it is your first time, we know you folks are learning and you all have other jobs. We have a lot of gratitude to the staff as well, like Wilma Akiona, Jenelle, and everyone behind the scenes making things happen. Thank you also to the Office of the County Attorney for all of their work, and also the Planning Department. You folks have been at this for a really long time, like Marie, Lea, Mike, and everybody. Every time a change is made, we know it comes back to you. We just wanted to say mahalo. To the citizens, it is not an easy process to participate in as a citizen; we are learning that, too. We just thank everyone who have been volunteering all of your time to participate. We just SPECIAL PLANNING 2 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING wanted to bring this into the room and ask that it continue to be a pono process and honor all of the work and also to bring a "place" into the room. We vote about places, but we do not actually often get to see them or make the decisions in the places, so when we can go and spend the time, it is so amazing; or we can bring them here with us. This is an all called "Aloha Anini." These are words that were written by Aunty Alice Namakelua when she visited Aunty Marilyn Inoa Anugu and her ohana and she sat on their porch at Wanini and wrote these words. Even though that is a very changed place, she talks about the swaying of the Coco Palms, the feel of the breeze that is so prevalent there at Kalihikai and Wanini, and the sound of the ocean. I think that is true of many places on Kaua`i that as they change, we hope that they can retain their essential character that reminds us of those who have gone before and helps us feel at home there and sustains us and guides us in all of the decisions that we make. With our aloha and gratitude for this place: (Mehana Blaich Vaughan and Jessica Fu performed an oh called `Aloha Anini.') Committee Chair Chock: Mahalo to Mehana and Jessica to helping us get off on the right foot there. I have a brief statement and I will just read it for you folks here so you folks can get acquainted with the process that we will be going through for the next few days. First of all, thank you all for being here during the Special Planning Committee Meeting. The Planning Committee will be introducing and voting on amendments to the General Plan Update draft that was approved by the Planning Commission, and then transmitted to the Council. At this time, I will ask everyone to please listen carefully as I provide an overview of the process that will be followed. Because the Planning Department's presentations have concluded a few weeks back, we will begin the meeting now with public testimony, as outlined in our rules. The way public testimony will work for this multiday meeting is that everyone has the opportunity to choose one (1) time when they would like to speak. You have two (2) options: you may either speak now or you may waive your opportunity to speak now and instead speak after all or at least most of the Councilmembers' amendments have been introduced. What will happen is that Councilmembers will be introducing various amendments, one at a time. This is a requirement of Parliamentary Procedure, which is a process that governs our meetings. As each amendment is introduced, Councilmembers and the public will receive a hard copy. However, in order to conserve paper, and because some of the amendments include maps printed in color, we ask that especially for the lengthy amendments that you try to share copies with each other or to review a master copy that staff will have available for you to borrow. Please be patient with our staff as they work to assist you with copies. We do not want to be wasteful by producing more copies than we actually need, and although I do not know the details of the amendments by other Councilmembers, I have been informed by staff that there is an extremely large volume of amendments, upwards of an amount of two hundred (200). Therefore, just leohua everyone. A Councilmember will introduce his or her amendment and a second is needed for the motion to become active. When an amendment is active, the community can then discuss the amendment and ask questions of the Planning Department and others in reference to the amendment. Normally, the vote will be taken on each amendment immediately after discussion; however, given the importance and widespread public interest on these issues, it has SPECIAL PLANNING 3 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING been decided that the Committee will refrain from voting on the amendments until all the public is afforded that one (1) opportunity to speak on the amendments that have been proposed. The way to accomplish this is by introducing the amendments and then allowing Councilmember discussion and questions, and then withdrawing the amendment before any vote is taken. We will then move on to introduce the next amendment and withdraw it before any vote. We will go through each one—which I am calling "packages" of amendments, we have about nine (9) different packages in total—until all or most of the Councilmembers' amendments have been introduced. Once that process concludes, then the second and final opportunity for public testimony will occur and will provide for anyone who did not have a chance to speak at the very front end. After the second opportunity for public testimony has concluded, the various amendments will then be reintroduced and voted on in-turn. It is my hope that we can go through the second round of amendments. Councilmembers, remain focused on the actual vote. Additionally, please be aware that the Committee Members may introduce new or altered amendments after all of the public testimony has concluded, if that is where the discussion leads. In addition, we may run into some overlap because there are so many amendments in terms of what is being presented and we will have to actually go back to the drawing board and work on those, probably in our next Committee Meeting. Please note that this may be a lengthy process and it is possible that we will not reach the second opportunity for public testimony until tomorrow or even Friday. There is no way to know when it will happen because it depends on the number of amendments and the length of discussion. Additionally, please be advised that the Council also has an unrelated Special Council Meeting scheduled tomorrow at 8:30 a.m., and again, we have a certificate at 1:30 p.m. today. Remember, if you wish to speak now before you see the specific amendment language, you may do so. Council Rule No. 11(6) remains in effect, which states that "oral testimony shall be limited to three (3) minutes per person." We thank you for your participation and cooperation. As always, it is my hope that the Committee will be as efficient as possible during the meeting days and that we can conclude no later than 4:30 p.m. each day. Also, please note that it is my goal to have all of the amendments introduced and distributed today. If we begin to approach 4:30 p.m., we will need to hold discussion until tomorrow and focus on actually introducing the amendments so they can get onto the floor. Everyone will then have a chance to review all of the materials this evening, and tomorrow morning we can reconvene and finish up any discussion, public testimony, and then vote. At this time, may I have a motion to approve and a second for the discussion purposes? Councilmember Yukimura moved to approve Bill No. 2666, seconded by Councilmember Kaneshiro. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Unless there are no questions by Councilmembers, I would like to call for public testimony. Vice Chair Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: I was just wondering if you were going to make the announcement about... Committee Chair Chock: I forgot. Why do you not do it? SPECIAL PLANNING 4 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: I think we received at least one hundred (100) E-mails on the Princeville issue... Committee Chair Chock: Actually more. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, at least, one hundred (100). I just wanted the Committee Chair to recognize that Princeville Development Corporation has decided that basically the conversation that I had with Mr. Fujiki was that they do not want to fight with the community over this and they realize that it is very contentious so they are pulling the project. They no longer want to do it. After that phone conversation, I have responded to many requests telling them that, but I still received a lot more, so I just want to make sure that we are not focused on that because that issue is done. There is no sense in continuing to argue for a point when it is already moot. It is done. Princeville no longer wants it and obviously the community does not want it. I just wanted us to remain focused on issues that need attention, not issues that do not need attention. Thank you, Chair. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Just to clarify, the confirmation is based on the fact that the developer is in agreement with removing the Princeville plateau from resort designation. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: However, it is not really done until there is a motion to remove that designation and the bill, as amended, is approved, and the Mayor signs Bill No. 2666, as amended. Committee Chair Chock: It needs to go through its process, absolutely. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, it has to go through the process. Committee Chair Chock: Any other questions? Councilmember Yukimura: But it is very good news that the developer is not opposing the removal of the resort designation and instead is going to do seventy-five (75) or seventy plus (70+) issues. If you have an issue with that, that takes an amendment of the agricultural subdivision law. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. With no further questions or objections, I will suspend the rules. Do we have public testimony? CODIE K. TABALBA, Council Services Assistant I: Yes, the first speaker is Glenn Mickens, followed by Gabriela Taylor. There being no objections, the rules were suspended. GLENN MICKENS: Thank you, Councilmember Chock. For the record, Glenn Mickens. Like Councilmember Kagawa said, this is not about Princeville, so I will talk about Hokua Place. Hopefully, you have a copy of my testimony. Let me read it for the viewing public: "Hopefully this body will do everything in their power to prohibit Hokua Place from building seven hundred SPECIAL PLANNING 5 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING eighty (780) dwellings behind Kapa'a Middle School and make sure that property is left in Agriculture. Should this project be allowed to move forward, the traffic and the activities from that development would create untold turmoil in that area. I use Olohena Road by that school on a regular basis and just ordinary traffic from parents dropping their children off for school is really bad, just getting to the roundabout. With the potential of one thousand three hundred (1,300) more vehicles coming out of the proposed development, the traffic and the turmoil would be horrendous. Even if other roads were built, getting to the bypass, that road sometimes backs up on the bypass southbound from the roundabout to Kuhio Highway, so only more gridlock would take place. We are past the tipping point now to allow more major development without first putting the infrastructure in place to handle it, as Gabriela said, `water, roads, landfill, and sewage facilities.' Obviously, our past leaders, for whatever reason, failed miserably at properly addressing these problems. Thus, they are with us today. We have a roadmap to show us what our failures are. So moving forward, let us be proactive and not reactive. Put a moratorium on all large future buildout until there is the infrastructure in place to handle it, as former Mayor Baptiste suggested we do." I think this is only common sense. If anybody has any disagreement, I would really like to hear this. If we do not do something, we are not doing anything about it and we are not getting more alternate roads or any of our roads are not getting paved properly and our traffic is getting worse and worse. If we do not take a stance now and try to do something...whatever it is, let us do something to move forward. We are not doing it. Anyway, this is my testimony, but that area up there is crowded enough as it is. There is a lot of people using that Olohena Road; it is a five mile per hour (5 MPH) road and a major artery on Kauai. I hope you do something about it. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: The next speaker, please. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Gabriela Taylor, followed by Marj Dente. GABRIELA TAYLOR: My name is Gabriela Taylor. I just want everybody to understand this amendment. This was in response to the fact that the Planning Commission had reversed the prior...the Planning Department's solution was to keep it in Agriculture and they moved it up at that point. Then this was made in the General Plan and then we amended it. This is actually in the future Land Use category, but it is specifically about Hokua Place. Glenn did a good job on the traffic; it is unbearable. Do not forget that there are three (3) already permitted resorts in the Wailua corridor, Coco Palms and the two (2) behind Longs that are going to be going up. It is diminishing our quality of life and rural lifestyle now. It is just going to be so much worse. Please have pity for us in Kapa`a. Then we get to number two— the affordable dwellings are not affordable with selling prices in the four hundred thousand dollar ($400,000) to nine hundred thousand dollar ($900,000) range. Yes, they do have...I think...I am not one hundred percent (100%) sure, but I think they have covered the thirty percent (30%) requirement with truly affordable houses, but that is questionable because they put market value next to it, which means in a period of time, like in a couple of years or three (3) years from now, they could be increasing those prices. Anyway, this encourages in-migration of mainlanders who can afford those high prices. So going against our request to decrease the population, because SPECIAL PLANNING 6 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING it is becoming out of control on Kauai. Food security and sustainably—no upzoning of Agriculture land should be allowed. Kauai now imports ninety percent (90%) of our food and we need to keep Agriculture land zoned to grow food for our residents and visitors and we need to follow the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO) directives. It seems like nobody paid attention to this, but they have said here in Article 8.1 that the purpose is to "protect agriculture lands to ensure a resource base adequate to meet needs of the present and future," which obviously means the residents; and the second one, "to limit and control subdivision." That is definitely something to pay attention to. Committee Chair Chock: Ms. Taylor... Ms. Taylor: "Limit and control the subdivision of agriculture land." Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a question. What do you mean by CZO? Ms. Taylor: The County Zoning Ordinance. Councilmember Yukimura: Oh, CZO. Ms. Taylor: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Ms. Taylor: You are welcome. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker, please. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Marj Dente, followed by Maka'ala Ka'aumoana. Ms. Taylor: Marj left, we lost a lot of people because of the time constraint here. Committee Chair Chock: Well, they can come back after lunch. We probably will not finish public testimony. Next speaker. MAKA`ALA KA`AUMOANA: Aloha Committee Chair and Councilmembers. Happy Holidays. Mahalo for this opportunity. I am going to start by thanking the Planning staff and the consultants who have worked so hard. I know your work starts now, but there have been years of effort invested by good people, including many members of the public who have participated. I appreciate the chance to acknowledge them. I am Maka'ala Ka'aumoana and I appreciate this opportunity to testify today as the Executive Director of the Hanalei Watershed Hui. Essentially, our organization implements the Hanalei Watershed Action Plan, which includes community-identified concerns and priorities, spanning issues such as water quality, SPECIAL PLANNING 7 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING agriculture, ahupua`a education, and disaster resilience. We have participated in the process of developing the General Plan Update at every opportunity afforded and are generally very pleased with the draft presented to you. I have focused my attention on two (2) specific areas: the Watershed section and those aspects related to Hanalei, including Princeville. We appreciate the recognition of our Watershed Management Plan and the Hanalei to Ha'ena Disaster Resilience Plan as examples for other Kaua`i communities to follow. Our model is collaborative and the County is an active participant. I hope we can provide useful information as you conclude your process and consider amendments that might fall within our expertise. Please let us know if we can provide information or assistance in any way. As we all know, pressures on our quality of life not only affect our people, but our places. The resources we require for our very existence are the same ones that we advertise in our brand, "The Garden Isle." Our watersheds provide our water, and for many, there are no collaborative efforts to restore and sustain them. The Hanalei watershed has very few native plants and is limited in its ability to hold water or soil. I hope this plan provides the direction and encouragement for the County to participate in this work. I support and encourage the establishment of community-based watershed councils to address these issues and provide a venue for focused discussions. In my work in the region now, I know one thing for certain: place-based management is what works. Bicultural knowledge includes human activity in the ecosystem, and it should. Our communities contain the real information and have the most at stake. This plan includes opportunities for that knowledge to work. Me ka pono. Committee Chair Chock: Mahalo. Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Elaine Valois, representing Kaua`i Community Coalition. Committee Chair Chock: Elaine? I do not see her here. Who is the next person? Ms. Tabalba: Nafisseh Soroudi. NAFISSEH SOROUDI: Aloha. Thank you for all of the hard work being done by Councilmembers, the Planning Committee, and the citizens. It has been a wonderful process by giving us the voice to feel that we are actually being heard. It is a very empowering process and I greatly appreciate the opportunity to participate in this local level. Our hopes are that, me as an individual of the public, as well as others, could actually benefit from this and see that we can make a difference. Thank you. I have spoken with Councilmember Yukimura and Chair Rapozo and perhaps you have heard about the various things that we have been proposing about the energy sector of the General Plan. Many parts of it have been well-thought through and we really appreciate that. We actually had put forward some other proposals as well. I just wanted to enumerate several key points just one more time before you actually make a decision about this. In general to begin with, we would like it to be addressed as "Energy Sustainability." That is really important as it is a standardized trend that is being used, not by our country, but at an international level. This was the greenhouse emissions being the number one goal for us to be reducing on Kauai. In accord with the Paris Agreement, which our SPECIAL PLANNING 8 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Governor has endorsed, and there was one mention of it in the General Plan and we would like to emphasize that. We got some (inaudible) after we talked to Chair Rapozo. Just to identify that greenhouse emissions be reduced by twenty-six percent (26%) to twenty-eight percent (28%) by year 2025, and in accord with that, a continued reduction to forty percent (40%) by 2035. If that is something that could be placed in,we would greatly appreciate it, since it is being endorsed by our Governor as well. In order to do that, there are several factors that had been mentioned, but not so much of a detail as would be to allow for more measurable goals. One thing, recycling—I believe it has been a rule or the law, but has not necessarily been implemented in the level that could be more beneficial for us, specifically adopting and implementing the Countywide zero waste strategy plan. So having recycling pick up at individual homes, as well as public events, and actually doing something with it, like building and maintaining a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) with staff assigned to locate markers for recycled material. Otherwise, we are going to become line Staten Island...we do not want to be living on a landfill. Where is this going to go? We need help. In terms of building designs, it is really important for us to require new buildings to incorporate economically feasible design to optimize energy sustainability. Committee Chair Chock: That is your time. Ms. Soroudi: That was very quick. Committee Chair Chock: Do you have it in writing? Ms. Soroudi: I do, may I E-mail it to you? Committee Chair Chock: Please do. Thank you. Ms. Soroudi: Will do. Thank you. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Katherine Muzik, followed by Ray Gordon. Committee Chair Chock: Katherine Muzik? I do not see her here. Next. Ms. Tabalba: Ray Gordon. Committee Chair Chock: Ray? RAY GORDON: Thank you, Councilmembers. I am here representing the Koloa Estates Community Association. Committee Chair Chock: Please state your name for the record. Mr. Gordon: Thank you, Councilmembers. Ray Gordon, President of the Koloa Estates Community Association. There is an issue with a road that goes through our community that is shown as...right now, it is a limited access, SPECIAL PLANNING 9 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING dead-end street. It is being proposed to be open to through-traffic. I had initially written a memorandum on behalf of the community in 2014, which I sent to the Council at that point. I will be sending a follow-up memorandum outlining some of the issues that I am bringing up today, later this afternoon. The connection to a limited bypass road right now is going to connect to Po`ipu Road to the western bypass road, and is something that we feel has limited traffic implications. I understand the issues of connectivity, but we feel that there are practical reasons why it would not make sense. It would also cut right through our community and open it up to a lot of traffic. Right now, there are kids playing there and it is a tree-lined street that we, in fact, maintain and are responsible for maintaining. There is no need for emergency vehicle access because the circle is where the Fire Department is so they can go right up that street. There has been no notice to the community or consultation with us on how that is going to happen or, in fact, any way of offering an alternative. The traffic coming down the highway right now will impact that intersection point because it is a forty mile per hour (40 MPH) road right now with a local street intersecting that and we find that that will be a safety issue with limited sightlines. We find that there is an initial loss of pedestrian access if there is pedestrian traffic coming across there on having cars coming through and turning at that point. Right now, there is a sidewalk that continues on north-south. There are also issues of stormwater draining runoff. Right now, storm water comes down that road and the bypass does not have any storm drainage. We have storm drainage internal to our project and if that street is open, then we see a significant amount of runoff coming down that street and will overwhelm our local drainage system. Given those issues, and even though we feel that there is probably no actual reason for having that open, we have an alternative that we would like to propose and it will be using an existing cane road just south of our street, about one hundred (100) yards south. We feel that would improve the access to the proposed recreation facility right at that location. It will provide better access to the community to that with a lot less turning motions, so it will be only one (1) turning motion instead of three (3), if you use Lopaka Paipa Boulevard. We feel that Kukui`ula Development is responsible for doing that construction and we feel that they can actually be incorporated into the construction they are required to do on that part as well. Committee Chair Chock: Mr. Gordon, is your expectation to have this recommendation in the General Plan? Mr. Gordon: I believe that that particular connection can be adjusted so that it can be located very nearby. We are not saying that you have to eliminate that connection, but simply moving that connection to another location. Right now, it is not a mapped street, so there still has to be some kind of... Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. We will address is separately. Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: Is Koloa Estates that the new subdivision just before you reach Kiahuna Golf Course, when you are going down the road on the right-hand side? SPECIAL PLANNING 10 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Gordon: If you are going down from Koloa Town to the circle, it is about halfway between those two (2) on the right-hand side. It is opposite...there is going to be an affordable housing project across the street to the left of this and we are on the right side. We are between the bypass road and Po`ipu Road. Councilmember Brun: Is that a County street? Mr. Gordon: Yes, it is a County street that has three (3) (inaudible) right now. Councilmember Brun: Thank you. Any more testimony on the General Plan? Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Dennis Hanna, followed by Al Vitale. Committee Chair Chock: Dennis Hanna left. Next. Ms. Tabalba: Al Vitale. AL VITALE: My name is Al Vitale and I first came to Kaua`i four (4) years ago, and the last two (2) years, I have spent about half my time here. I have a lot of appreciation for the people that were here before me and I guess some things surprised me when I found out how polluted the rivers and bays were. Some tourists asked me the other day what river I like to swim in and I had to dance around the question because I did not want to answer it honestly and say that they were all polluted. On the mainland, you can ship your waste to another state or something, kind of"out of sight, out of mind," but I guess I was hoping that on a small island like this, maybe there is more environmental consciousness. I guess what I am asking is that attention be put on considering an islandwide sewer system or some way to handle the waste so that the rivers are not polluted and the beauty of the island would be so tangible that you can swim in a clean river. I understand human nature and that it is easy to push these things off, like it has been done with other things, but maybe there is a way to do it in stages; at least do the Hanalei area because I understand that there are cesspools that flood in heavy rain. So maybe the whole island does not have to be done, but maybe pick target areas. Thank you for listening. Happy Holidays. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Next. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Jessica Fu. JESSICA FU: Aloha mai kahou. I am Jessica Fu. I E-mailed you folks all of my written testimony, and as I said in my E-mail, I would provide the hard copies of the petition that we created to ask for the removal of resort land use in Princeville. I do not want to waste anybody's time about that, so I will talk about something else for just a second. I would just like to show my support and thanks for you all and all that you are doing and I want to show my support for a couple of things: SPECIAL PLANNING 11 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING the mauka to makai streamflow that a lot of the amendments talk about that; open space, as in the case of Maha`ulepu, I am in support of that as well. I think with the petition that we made, there was a lot of support for the removal of the resort zoning, but in general, a lot of those people that signed the petition are just in support of different ways to utilize agriculture lands and to take better care of our resources. I just want to show my support for those things and thank you all. Committee Chair Chock: Mahalo nui. Anyone else? Would anyone like to testify now? Please come up. ANNE THURSTON: Thank you. My name is Anne Thurston. Throughout this process, I have been giving you reports on the petitions that have been signed, in favor of really just in strong support of this process for which we are very grateful. To-date, we have collected one thousand five hundred forty-seven (1,547) signatures in support of the objective of paying more attention to the issues. I want to thank the Chair of the Planning Committee, and just to pass over the latest batch of signatures to you to tell you once again that this is not a legal process; this is just an expression of community support and appreciation for what you are doing. We know that it is not legally binding and we know that some people may have signed more than once, but I do not think that takes away the real appreciation that we have. Committee Chair, I will pass these over to you and just to say that this process is still underway, even while we have been talking this morning, a whole number of new signatures have come in. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you very much. I see Marj. You do not need to sign another form. You can come up because I heard your name called earlier. We have additional people to testify as well. MARJ DENTE: Do I have to do anything to speak? Committee Chair Chock: You need to state your name. Ms. Dente: Marj Dente. Olohena ahupua a. Thank you for letting me speak, I know my name was called earlier. I do not know what the amendments are going to be, but while you are considering, I would like you to consider the following points: the population on this island is going off the wall, not from tourists. It has been admitted and it is happening because of the birthrate. I would like all of you to consider the possibility of getting Planned Parenthood back on this island to help people with their contraception needs. It is very, very important if we are talking about taking care of our keiki and grandchildren. We have no access at the middle school for Hokua Place. It is just horrible now. I live above in the uplands of Kapa`a. If I come down the hill anytime school is letting out, I have to stop on the hill coming toward Kapa'a Town and wait in line for the people picking up their students. It is an outrageous line. If I cannot wait, I have to go into the oncoming line to get past the school when school gets out. That is a very big consideration for not allowing Hokua Place to change the zoning or the State land board to change the zoning there. There is absolutely no way that access into that kind of place with that many houses can be accommodated. I do not care if it is a roundabout or what it is. I know that the County probably would never insist that SPECIAL PLANNING 12 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING the developer pay for such an entrance into that place. It will be absolutely impossible. If Hokua Place is allowed to go there, then guess what? To pay any kind of rent on a convenience store, which is being suggested there, they are going to have to sell alcohol. It is real obvious. They had to do that at the Wailua Country Store up there on the hill. They could not make it unless they sell alcohol. This is not a good idea next to a school, so please consider that in your amendments. Tiny houses— you have set a precedent here, County. Council Chair and Councilmember Brun was there for the open house. That "Tiny House" has a full kitchen and it is only four hundred eighty (480) square feet. This now should allow guesthouses at five hundred (500) square feet to have a full-size kitchen. What this will allow is for people to have affordable housing, a five hundred (500) square foot house and be able to cook their own meals, rather than to go out and get unfortunate, fat-giving meals for their subsistence. Thank you very much for allowing me to speak. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Would anyone else like to testify today? Mr. Rosa. JOE ROSA: For the record, Joe Rosa. I am here in regards that before they start any development in that area, Kapa'a uplands—why wait until the State Department of Transportation (HDOT) is going to do something that is going to cost so much money to relocate the power pole and electric post, like they did in Kukui Grove here, but money could be spent on a new highway. Like as I say, an alternate route in the backlands between Kuhio and Kamala Road area or the Olohena Road area. I worked with HDOT and the plans were on the board, but politics was involved, but it never got started. There was funding made available, but they did not use it and Honolulu grabbed it for their highway development over there. The old saying is, "You snooze, you lose." Before that development develops and gets started, they should have the infrastructure in first, like I saw this happen in the mainland in 1952, when the interstate highway was heading from east to west. I saw the Ohio-Pennsylvania turnpike be developed at that time and then I saw it as a reality later on in my years. Anything (inaudible) along with infrastructure, the highway system, the airlines, by way of the rail or the trucking. Before the development comes in, and I do not think that they should have any commercial area business in that area, because it is just one (1) mile away to Kapa'a Town. I go one (1) mile from my way all the way to Kukui Grove and I have to go through this mess again, but if they had the backroad from where I live, then I could just go scoot up in the back and go to Kukui Grove in a couple of minutes without any stoplights, because in the back there, it would be all opened speed limits because there is no residential/school areas and those kind of speed limits. Those are the kinds of things that people have to be realistic to the fact that it is high time we have some other highways leading out of Lihu`e and go to Kaumuali`i and Kuhio—there has not been any changes, other than what they did at Kukui Grove, which has hardly done anything except make that a racetrack from the way people speed up and down that area there. It is not a thirty-five mile per hour (35 MPH) area. They go zooming by. That goes for pickup trucks, regular delivery trucks, and everything. Before these developers think of coming in, do something and work with the HDOT to see that they do something with the infrastructure. We need alternate routes, because in that area if there is a tsunami, there is no passing from where they are approaching the SPECIAL PLANNING 13 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Wailua Bridge. So you folks have to think about...the Planning Department has to think about making an alternate route. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Would anyone else like to testify? Going once? Going twice? Everyone else is in for the long haul? Okay, good. At this time, I will call the meeting back to order. Members, we have about twenty (20) minutes, so I want to propose these two (2) options here. One is that we would introduce the amendments, and as I said before, we have about nine (9) different packages. The first one would be the big group of pretty much typos and technical kind of amendments that are being proposed by the consultants. Then there is a big set of amendments that are being proposed in another package by the Planning Department that they have been working on. Then we have packages by each Councilmember, if Councilmembers have chosen to...some of them have two (2) because the way we have really done some work, and if people are looking really tired from the Planning Department and our staff here, Jenelle, it is because that they have been doing a lot of work in the last few days and weeks... Councilmember Yukimura: And nights. Committee Chair Chock: Yes, and what they have been doing is really trying to get to some consensus around things that have come to this table and in discussion over the last couple of months around the General Plan in order to formulate amendments that would meet the satisfaction of the Planning Department, as well as the Councilmembers who are proposing them, as well as the community members who are asking for them. So what you will see when you get these packages is that you will have a column that actually outlines the Planning Department's approval of it, or not. I would say that about ninety percent (90%) to ninety-five percent (95%) of the amendments that are being proposed have been...I mean all of them have been reviewed by the Planning Department and about ninety-five percent (95%) of them have been approved by the Planning Department or written by the Planning Department. The options that I would like to propose is that we can try and get all of those amendments out on the table before lunch so that you have all of them, and then the community will have them also. That means we will introduce all of the packages, but we would not talk about them, or we can just start with package number one and have the discussion on it and move to package two and so forth. What is the interest of this body? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I think that we should introduce them all so that everyone can see what is on the table. Committee Chair Chock: Good. Anyone else? If not, we will do that and get them all on the table. Council Chair Rapozo: Are you talking about all two hundred (200) amendments? Committee Chair Chock: Pretty much. SPECIAL PLANNING 14 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: But some are in packages, so there will not be two hundred (200) motions. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. There will be nine (9) motions. Council Chair Rapozo: Can the staff handle that process? Committee Chair Chock: I believe so. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I start? Council Chair Rapozo: I want to make one quick comment just so that the public understands that these amendments that are being circulated today, it is going to be the first time the Members see them, so please...we appreciate your patience. We have not seen any other Members' amendments, so this is going to be the first time for all of us, including you, to see these amendments. Thank you. Councilmember Kaneshiro: This first amendment is by request, so not even I have seen it. Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 1, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, so this is the consultant's typos amendment. Councilmember Kaneshiro withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 1, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. That is one. Councilmember Kaneshiro: So I have another amendment by request and I believe this is the Planning Department's changes. Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. SPECIAL PLANNING 15 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kaneshiro withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Next. Councilmember Kagawa: Can I ask a question? Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Councilmember Kagawa: How much trees did we cut down for all of this paper? Committee Chair Chock: That is why we are asking people to share. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, you should ask how many trees we are saving by passing these amendments. Councilmember Kagawa: Okay. There she goes. Councilmember Yukimura: At least some of them. I have not seen all of them, so I should not speak for all. Chair, I will introduce this amendment that is removing the resort designation in Princeville Phase II. Councilmember Yukimura moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 3, seconded by Councilmember Kaneshiro. Committee Chair Chock: Can you withdraw, please? Council Chair Rapozo: Real quick, why do we not just vote on it and kill it? It is done. There is no reason to have to keep this going. It is a done deal and if you change your mind, you can do a reconsideration. This one has been resolved. I would suggest that we vote on this one and put this to rest. Councilmember Yukimura: Good thing I did not withdraw it. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion on this amendment? Council Chair Rapozo: Jenelle, the map is the same map? The golf course designation is the same, right? It has not been changed? Okay. I know that in Planning's amendment, you may see an expansion of the golf course zone, which I do not support. I just wanted to make sure that this one is, in fact, the same as it was in the original. If that is the case, then I am prepared to vote. SPECIAL PLANNING 16 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: These are all of the attached maps that are necessary for the amendment. Any further questions? Councilmember Yukimura: Did we need to ask if there is testimony? Committee Chair Chock: No. We are going to keep it all together. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I make a comment? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: I think the rationale for this action has been well-stated by the community over and over again, and I basically just want to thank the community; Mehana and her team, and all of you who have generated such a turnout of testimony, over hundred (100) pieces of testimony. Some are for Hokua Place, but I am guessing that those who do not want Hokua do not want Princeville Resort either. It is just such evidence of the kind of community heart there is and willingness to standup for what needs to be done. Mahalo nui loa to all of you and those who are not here, but who took part in speaking out. Thank you very much. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmembers, I realize now that we are taking this, we can essentially run this into lunch, so I do want to hear from each of you, if we could just do it quickly, that way we can introduce the rest of them. Go ahead. Councilmember Kawakami: I would like to marry those comments and also expand on them by also thanking the developer for listening to the people. Oftentimes, we are stuck in the middle with a stubborn developer and the public that has a different sentiment. In this case, it is a good example of somebody that has heard and has listened and has taken the unusual step of actually listening. I think it is a rare occasion. I think when there is good behavior, they deserve to be recognized. To Jeff Stone and that group, mahalo nui loa. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I was going to say the same thing and Councilmember Kagawa mentioned Randy Fujiki. One of the best things a developer can do on Kaua`i is to find a representative who is genuine and sincere about the betterment of the community. In this case, that has been said already. I spoke to Randy personally, as I think probably all of us have, and there was a sincere desire to accommodate the community's request, in my opinion, and that is not always the case. Like the others have said, I do want to give them the commendation that they actually did want to make this right, which they did in our opinion. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Further discussion? Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, those are the words that came out of Mr. Fujiki's mouth and our conversation with him was that they wanted to do things SPECIAL PLANNING 17 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING the right way and do not want to fight with the community. They want to be good neighbors and I commend those comments. I am glad that they did not let this Council have to decide on this issue when they decided to do the right thing on their own. Thank you. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I just wanted to remind everyone that they also took out their mauka and mahai areas and I think that is the first in the plan for people to take out designations. I do not think anywhere else in the plan that has been done. I thank both sides for working it out and not putting us in a gray situation where there will be no winner if it came to us and we had to decide. There was going to be someone that was going to be mad and there was someone that was going to be happy, so I am glad that it was resolved ahead of time. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion? The motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled`Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 3 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: This amendment passes 7:0. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 4, seconded by Councilmember Yukimura. Council Chair Rapozo withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 4, Councilmember Yukimura withdrew the second. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Kaneshiro: For this one, as we go through it, are we going to be taking this in verbatim? Committee Chair Chock: You mean seriatim? Councilmember Kaneshiro: Yes, seriatim. Committee Chair Chock: What I would like to do is once we get the amendments, and we can look at them and we will take them one package at a time, you will be able to review again what the stance of the Planning Department is. As we have our discussion and if there are ones that stand out that we do not want to SPECIAL PLANNING 18 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING have in there as the package, then we can take those out and vote on them separately, but my hope is that as much as possible we can take the bulk of them together. Council Chair Rapozo: Really, as far as for my amendments, I think I have three (3) packets that I will ask Planning to be prepared to explain their positions of nonsupport. Some of these baffle me, so I just want to have them ready and prepared to answer those questions. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 5, seconded by Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Yukimura: What is it? Committee Chair Chock: It is coming. Chair, is it single or is it a packet? Council Chair Rapozo: It is a packet. Council Chair Rapozo withdrew the to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 5, Councilmember Brun withdrew the second. Councilmember Kagawa: Can I ask a quick question? What was the difference in separating those two (2) packets? Council Chair Rapozo: I am sorry? Councilmember Kagawa: When it first came around, Councilmember Kaneshiro said, "Okay, this is the consultant's packet. The second one was from the Planning Department." So the first one was the consultant's packet, second was Planning's packet, and the third one was Princeville. Then you have four (4) and five (5), so I am wondering why the two (2) are separate. Is there a reason why? Council Chair Rapozo: These are amendments that I am introducing by request of members of the community. That is what specifies it. If you look at the... Councilmember Kagawa: So your fourth one is not by the community, it is by you? Council Chair Rapozo: Which one? Councilmember Kagawa: What is the difference between the fourth and the fifth one? The previous one that we did. Council Chair Rapozo: Princeville? SPECIAL PLANNING 19 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: Yes...no...the one after that. Council Chair Rapozo: This is my personal. Councilmember Kagawa: So that is your personal, and then the one that we have now is the one that you did by request? Council Chair Rapozo: Correct. Councilmember Kagawa: So that was the difference? That was my question. Council Chair Rapozo: Yes. Councilmember Kagawa: Thank you. Council Chair Rapozo: I have one more. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 6, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Council Chair Rapozo: I received E-mails criticizing me for introducing...I do not even know how my amendments got to the public, but it did. These are draft amendments, really for internal use only, and I am not sure how it circulated out to the general public. I received some E-mails asking, "Why are you doing this?" It was kind of bad. Some people will sit here today and say that the Planning process went extremely well and I will stand here and say that I disagree. I will sit here today and say that as I watch this thing go on in the community and the television...I never went to one meeting, but I did watch on television...I really do not think that the public had an opportunity to really voice and I think Princeville is a good example. The community said to take it out and it did not get taken out. In fact, it did get taken out and it got put back in. I do not think the community was heard as much as they should have. When this came to us, I had a long heart-to-heart with Councilmember Chock and I said, "Let us give this community an opportunity, a venue, to voice what they needed to voice." I appreciate Councilmember Chock's leadership in this in that he allowed the community to participate. All of the amendments that came to me for introduction are not going to be in this packet; some, I just could not, and I am hoping that if others did, then that is fine. But the ones that I could firmly agree with and support, I did. I would encourage others to do the same. We wanted a process that involved the community. That is the best way of saying it. This is a community document. It is not a Council or Planning Department document. I just want to make it clear that not all of the amendments that were submitted to me to introduce were introduced, and I am going to say that upfront. You will see it all today. If some are missing, I would suggest that you go see other Councilmembers and talk to them about it, but we are trying to get a document and amendments that have the best chance of success of passage and that is what I have SPECIAL PLANNING 20 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING hoped to accomplish. I just wanted to make those comments before we go forward in case people get copies of the amendments and say, "Hey, what happened to that part I wanted?" I am relying a lot on Jenelle, who has to compile all of this stuff and using her judgement as far as how many conflicting...we cannot talk to anybody with this Sunshine Law, so this is the first time we are seeing these amendments. I just really want to make it clear that hopefully all of the amendments, through some portal here on the seven-body council, will get introduced, but not everyone is going to be satisfied with the outcome. That is the process. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I just go over them to make it clear which amendment was which? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Number one was the consultant's, number two was Planning's, number three was Princeville, number four was the Chair's amendments, number five is by request by the Chair, which looks like community amendments, and number six...have we already passed that one? Committee Chair Chock: No. Councilmember Yukimura: We have just done five. Committee Chair Chock: We have just gotten six and it is a separate amendment by Chair Rapozo by request of the community. Councilmember Yukimura: Regarding housing? This is the community housing one, right? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. We need a withdrawal on this. Council Chair Rapozo withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 6, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Councilmember Yukimura: Wait, community housing was six? Council Chair Rapozo: Correct. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Do you want me to introduce mine now? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 21 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 7, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Yukimura withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 7, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Councilmember Kagawa: Councilmember Yukimura, can you explain the difference, too? Councilmember Yukimura: I need to figure this out myself. Councilmember Kagawa: If you do not know that then you can wait until later. Committee Chair Chock: Number seven was the `Ele`ele-Hanapepe boundary. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, so number seven is the proposal or the amendment to move the boundary between South Kaua`i and Hanapepe--`Ele`ele to its traditional boundary that was in the 2000 General Plan. Councilmember Kagawa: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: So that is number seven, which we have already introduced. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Next. Councilmember Yukimura to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 8, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Yukimura: This is number eight and these are my personal amendments, which are partial, but that is as far as we could get. Councilmember Kagawa: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 8, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. SPECIAL PLANNING 22 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. We have one more. Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 9, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. This is my set of amendments introduced by Councilmember Kaneshiro by request. Councilmember Kaneshiro withdrew the motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 9, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. We should have eight (8) packets. Councilmember Kagawa: Nine (9), right? Committee Chair Chock: Well, Princeville passed, so we do not need to look at that one anymore. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Number three is done with. So now everyone has the packets and we can get them to the community. We will be back for discussion and we will take each packet one at a time for discussion. When we are done with that, we will come back to testimony. Have a good lunch. See you at 1:30 p.m. There being no objections, the meeting recessed at 12:33 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 1:51 p.m., and proceeded as follows: Committee Chair Chock: Welcome back to our Special Planning Committee Meeting. We are so efficient that I think we might have to make some adjustments. At the break or right before the break, Councilmember Kaneshiro did say that it was kind of hard that we have all of these amendments now and we have to look at all of them. The other consideration is that what we have done is actually taken back all of the amendments in order for the public to have it. Therefore, it does give us the opportunity for public testimony to occur now and I see that the public is here. I just want to get a show of hands, how many people are here to testify, now that you have the amendments? Seeing none, Councilmembers, this is kind of what I am faced with and I would like your feedback on is that there are a couple of options: one is that we take public testimony now and then we introduce, discuss, and vote on amendments altogether; or we can introduce, as we have done previously and withdraw today with testimony tomorrow, so we could actually plan for that. The third option is that we could recess early today and begin with public testimony tomorrow in the morning and then move right into discussion. Those are the three (3) SPECIAL PLANNING 23 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING options that we have right now, just so you folks have a sense. We thought what we would do initially was actually introduce them all and talk about all of them, and that is not what we did, because the public would not have gotten all of the amendments. What we chose to do was introduce them all to get all of the amendments out there. At this point, what is it that you would like to entertain? Council Chair Rapozo: Just for the sake of time, I think there has to be some amendments that are everyone agrees with, and I would suggest that in the time that we do have is that we go through the ones...like packet number one is typographical, housekeeping amendments that I do not believe are substantive. As I went through them, it does not look like there is anything substantive in this, so I would suggest if we can move this one out, like we did Princeville, and then we will do the same for number two. If there are any amendments here that we believe...maybe we have Planning's concurrence and I know we can do it in seriatim, but I would just suggest that we get through as many of them as we can that the majority of the Council would support and get that out of the way today. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. What I am hearing is and what we could do, especially for the technical ones, which is packet number one, is that we just would move through them because we could probably even vote on them, just like we did Princeville today. For instance, my packet that I introduced earlier, I do have Planning's support on all of them, so we could...I guess my point is that I would actually have to introduce them again, and then if we wanted public testimony later, like tomorrow, then we would have to pull it back before the vote. The public testimony is there again for another time because people have not testified in the effort of waiting for it. So I just want to get a sense of that. I think we could definitely get through packet number one. For the others, I am not sure. Councilmember Kagawa: I agree with what Council Chair Rapozo said, as well as what you said, and I would add that it is okay also if we pass all of the ones that can be passed and if the public testifies and we find out that there are some changes that we wanted to make to the amendments that were passed previously, we could go back and open it up. I agree with Council Chair that we should knock out the ones that we can right off the bat, get those done, and the public still has time to chime in if they go over it tonight and decide tomorrow, "Hey, we do not like this certain part of the amendment that had passed." There is still that time, but if we just keep going through all of them without getting any out of the way, it is going to be even longer. I would suggest as well, like Chair said, like the ones where you have Planning's concurrence, I do not see any problem, as long as the members do not have any questions or disagreement with Planning. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I actually have a concern about the first packet, so I just want to let you know that. Committee Chair Chock: Can you share the concern? Councilmember Yukimura: I think we can... SPECIAL PLANNING 24 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: We have to introduce them again, I think, is what we have to do. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, but I am just telling you that it is not that clear-cut in everything. I do not mind passing the ones we think we agree on, except that we have to all agree that if there is testimony that comes up later, we will allow that to be taken out and discussed. Committee Chair Chock: It sounds like that is in agreement. Councilmember Yukimura: And re-voted on... Committee Chair Chock: If there is consensus that we want to do that. Council Chair Rapozo: There would have to be a motion to reconsider. That is the only way you would be able to get it done. So someone that was on the prevailing side would have to make the motion to reconsider. Councilmember Yukimura: You can always do that at the end of a meeting... Council Chair Rapozo: You can do it at the end of that meeting or at the very next meeting, but that is the only time. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. I agree. So what we will do so that it does not get any more complicated is let us reintroduce one-by-one and just pull them back as we need. That way, we will know where we are on all of them. Can we reintroduce the first one? Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 1, seconded by Council Chair Rapozo. Committee Chair Chock: Any questions or discussion on this one? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: On page number 45... Committee Chair Chock: Do you need the Planning Department here? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: So we are going to ask the Planning Department to come up for questions on page number 45. Councilmember Yukimura: It is number 45 on page 7. It is about the Plantation Camp designation and it actually raises the question about all SPECIAL PLANNING 25 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING designations, because I have not been able to really determine where we authorized those designations. As I recall before, General Plan designations used to be authorized by ordinance in ordinance language that put them...I do not know...how in our zoning...create zoning categories in our CZO, right? I have not been able to find in the ordinance itself where we have authorized the existing General Plan designations and now we are creating some new ones, like "Neighborhood General" and "Plantation Camp," until we indicated that "Plantation Camp" is not meant as a land use designation, but instead is just a descriptive place type. I do not know the distinction between a descriptive place type and a land use designation and where that is all really clarified. It is sort of the interface of form-based code, an existing ordinance, and I just have not been able to get clear about that. Can you clarify that? That would be helpful. MICHAEL A. DAHILIG, Planning Director: Mike Dahilig, Planning Director. The item that relates to Plantation Camp, the reason why we added this language in was because there was a discussion at some point during the department's presentation about the concern whether or not Plantation Camp would allow for an expansion of uses to the point where you could insert urbanized type of zoning into these areas. We added the words "descriptive place type" as a means to be very clear that we are not attempting to have Plantation Camp be an expansive or a more intensive type of development. We added that based on that discourse we had with you during our presentation. Getting to the broader question, the place types in general are actually set by what happens with the General Plan. Any ordinance that either changes or if you adopt a new CZO, all of those items have to be aligned with this. So you are correct in the sense that there is going to be a misalignment with the CZO presently because the CZO by State law has to draw its descriptive authority and consistency from the General Plan document under Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) 46-4. There will be in effect a misalignment that then pushes us, if this plan were to be passed, to then come in with another set of zoning amendments to actually align the zoning types, the stub-outs for form-based code, and those types of things. It is in effect a change of the whole organic document. Councilmember Yukimura: But it is not existent right now? Mr. Dahilig: Not existent in the sense that it is regulatory, but if this plan were to be passed, then it provides a stub-out that the ordinance is consistent with State law. Councilmember Yukimura: So where in State law or County law are the existing General Plan designations established? Mr. Dahilig: As long as it is aligned with what is perceived as the authority under 205, what it generally is with current standards is that 46-4, all that it requires is that the County adopt zoning ordinances consistent with a comprehensive general plan. That is the language. There is no further articulation so to what type of place types have to be labeled or encompassed as part of a cache of uses. SPECIAL PLANNING 26 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: So the Princeville Resort category that we just removed,where is that resort authorized in the present law? It must be in the present law somewhere. Mr. Dahilig: There is no implementing ordinance that actually enables resort usage on that property. Councilmember Yukimura: They did not have any rights at all then? Mr. Dahilig: They did not. Councilmember Yukimura: There is something crazy about this. I think the County Attorney has to weigh-in on this. I would like some confirmation on how the system works. If we want to pass this today, I would recommend taking out this section. Committee Chair Chock: The County Attorney is here if you would like to pose a question. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, if he can answer the question. Mr. Dahilig: To make it clear, we put this in as a response to Council discourse, so we have no objections if this wants to be removed from discussion. Councilmember Yukimura: But it does affect every other General Plan designation that we are talking about? I am asking for the authorization basis for the General Plan designations, including Neighborhood General. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Someone can make the motion to amend to approve all but number 45... JENELLE AGAS, Legislative Assitant: 46, too. Council Chair Rapozo: And 46. It is really...the majority of this Council will vote. If everybody has that concern, I guess you can move it forward or defer it, but I think let us move. So 45 and 46, Councilmember Yukimura is asking to take it out. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, is the County Attorney going to answer? MAUNA KEA TRASK, County Attorney: Aloha. For the record, Mauna Kea Trask, County Attorney. Can you restate the question, Councilmember Yukimura? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. For item 45 of the first packet, on page 7, there is an explanation that "Plantation Camp" is not a land use General Plan SPECIAL PLANNING 27 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING designation that carries with it...I do not know what at this point, but anyway, does not convey any indication of a future land use, and in fact, is just a place type and I have asked what statutory basis there is for General Plan designations in general, because I think that is where the distinction should be made of Plantation Camp, but I have not been able to find it anywhere in the ordinance. Mr. Trask: You have not been able to find "place type." Councilmember Yukimura: No, I have not been able to find authorization of General Plan designation. Mr. Trask: I am going to have to research that. I do not really understand the question at this point. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: Let me explain. Mr. Trask: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: We have General Plan designations in the General Plan, and then we have correlating zoning designations and I expect that they have to be authorized somewhere in the law. Mr. Trask: If I may briefly, I am pulling up the statute right now. Council Chair Rapozo: Can I ask a real quick question of Mike? You said that this was at the request of the Council. Is that what you said? Mr. Dahilig: It was in response to some of the Council discourse concerning Plantation Camp being maybe too expansive of a definition that it could intensify usage in these areas. So that is why we added the phrase "descriptive place type" so that we can ensure that it does not become a regulatory expansion. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, not so much an expansion, but a creation of urban town centers all over the place, more than we have identified in the past. Mr. Dahilig: And we concur. Council Chair Rapozo: I would suggest that maybe you amend or modify your motion. SPECIAL PLANNING 28 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kaneshiro: Should we do it all as one or individually? Is there more questions? I would rather just go through and say we are going to amend taking out all of the sections at once, whatever sections. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: So we are voting to remove this description from the General Plan? Committee Chair Chock: Just 45 and 46 at this time. Councilmember Kawakami: The Plantation Camp? Committee Chair Chock: Let me see what page this is...it is the specific language here... Councilmember Yukimura: I am not proposing to remove it, I am just proposing that the amendment itself be considered separate from this packet and considered when we have the research or the explanation back from Planning or the County Attorney. Council Chair Rapozo: I would move forward with the motion. Committee Chair Chock: Is there anything else in the package is what Councilmember Kaneshiro was asking? Mr. Dahilig: If I could just take a second and guide the Councilmembers through what I think is the rub in the document—we have designations defined and laid out between pages 54 and 60 in the plan. However, we also have place types that are defined in page 62 through 64 in the plan. However, both the designations from 54 through 60 and the place types from 62 through 64 are molded into an overall spatial policy in the land use maps. If there is a concern that the interpretation of place type is not consistent with the other land use designations that are established between pages 54 through 60...that may be what is the problem, but ultimately, what we are doing with the numbers 45 and 46 essentially was to just enhance the definition of place type to ensure that that intense urbanization was not going to be an option for future zoning amendments. Committee Chair Chock: That can be addressed separately if necessary. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I agree with the idea of addressing it separately. You described two (2) sets of pages and I see from 54 to...sorry...59, right? That is one set. Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: What was the other set you described? SPECIAL PLANNING 29 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: From 62 through 64 and the proposed amendments affect the language on page 64. Councilmember Yukimura: I learned last week that there is—and this is partly because of my lack of knowledge about form-based codes—that there are zoning designations that correlate with General Plan designations as related to form-based codes and I think it is kind of important for us to know...you gave us what the conventional zoning correlates to possibly the General Plan designations, but I understand that there are other form-based code relationships that we should know in terms of what the General Plan designation is actually forecasting as possibilities and some of that will be determined by community plans, but there still are, I learned, some relationships and formula that are connected that give people a better idea of what will be expected from the General Plan designations. Mr. Dahilig: Let us take a moment to maybe grab...maybe in a future discussion over the next three (3) days. We can grab the communication and send it over to the Council that outlaid that matrix, so I know what you are referring to. I do not have that in front of me at the moment. Then we can get back to you on that. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Any more questions on this amendment? Council Chair Rapozo: Are there any other Councilmembers' concerns regarding 45 and 46? I guess that is my question. Councilmember Yukimura: I do not see any right now. Council Chair Rapozo: No, with 45 and 46, because we are spending a lot of time on 45 and 46, but the votes may be there to leave it in. Committee Chair Chock: I think everyone is in agreement to leave it in. Go ahead. Councilmember Kagawa: I am okay with leaving it in. I am okay with it, the way Planning has recommended it to be. Pakala and Kaumakani has been a plantation camp for a very long time; I believe twenty (20) years from now, it will be a plantation camp. I do not know what the problem with the language is. Councilmember Yukimura: I do not have any objections to them, but I think we are mixing apples and oranges. Councilmember Kagawa: I do not think we are mixing apples and oranges, but you may think so. I am fine with that. Councilmember Yukimura: I am trying to really understand place type and General Plan designation, and in order to understand that, I have to know where the authorization is for General Plan designation because that is the place where we SPECIAL PLANNING 30 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING probably should make the distinction. I want to make sure that this distinction holds that, in fact, we are not creating more town cores from this designation and I would ask that at least we inquire and understand this before we vote on it. Councilmember Kagawa: I understand Kaumakani and PAkala just as well as you do. Councilmember Yukimura: I do not doubt that. That is not the issue. Council Chair Rapozo: Mr. Chair, this is very clear and it says that it is "intended as a descriptive place type and is not a land use designation with specific land use policies." I do not know how much clearer you can get. This is not a land use designation. Mr. Trask: Councilmember Yukimura, as I understand your question, the "Plantation Camp" is in line with a policy of the General Plan, which says, "To acknowledge the existence of the old plantation camps," to say they exist, they have existed, "that because of their location, centrally within large tracts of agricultural land, they are not conducive with further development and density," but we are going to acknowledge their existence, and therefore, "they are not going to be considered for future areas of potential growth." Place types do not exist in the County Code either. That is technical planning...I do not want to say "jargon," but it is a term of art. I think the clarification therefore in the amendment is well-put in that it is not a land use designation and is intended just as a descriptive. So it would be in line with the authorization in Chapter 7 to state policies. Councilmember Yukimura: Mauna Kea, I am not disputing the description and the distinction. I am asking for the mechanism, by which General Plan designations are created. I have not gotten an answer to that yet, because if you are going to distinguish it from General Plan designations, then it should be done wherever that authorization occurs. Committee Chair Chock: Which I believe we had a response from Planning that they would work towards clarification. Councilmember Yukimura: That is why I am hoping we will pull this out. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: I am just getting thoroughly confused because I see a moving target on this thing and one of the concerns I heard is that we are not just creating new urban town cores and I think it is pretty clear in the description of a plantation camp that it is not doing that. It is just saying that "it is a historic remnant of a former plantation housing camp that is not associated with the present day center and is located in a rural area, this type of cluster of houses with little or no retail or service uses, while other place types promote pedestrian-oriented development, the single-use nature of this place-type results in an environment that is primarily auto-oriented and would not be considered future areas of potential SPECIAL PLANNING 31 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING growth." So I think it is clear that this type of description is not creating these urban town centers. It is pretty clear. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: I would not be supporting taking this out. It is my goal to leave it in. I do not know if we are just looking at Kaumakani, but I could never see that growing into a big place. That is farming at its finest, where we have been our whole life. I do not know what the big concern about that place is. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Furthermore, like this whole process has been vetted previously with the Planning Department and the Planning Commission, where they actually went out to the west side communities, and I know Councilmember Kaneshiro and I went out to the west side to hear directly from them, and they are happy with the description that describes the west side and the plantation camps that are in this document. Thank you, Chair. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I think this language really validates or "reinforces," I guess is the right word, the desire not to develop, that really it is just showing it on the map and it carries no real weight as far as land use designation. I think it actually helps. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: What is the underlying zoning here? Mr. Dahilig: It is either Agricultural or Open across the island. There are so many of them that it varies, but those are the two (2) designations. Just for your reference, I just want to refer you that the communication we sent back to the Council, it was an October 13th communication over to us that we responded on October 17th. So this relates to that matrix that you are referring to. Councilmember Yukimura: You mean the corresponding zoning to the... Mr. Dahilig: Which we also confirmed that it is Agricultural or Open. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I am asking a legal question. I am not disputing the policy. I believe they are plantation camps and they have a really rich history and heritage that we all want to protect and perpetuate, even in terms of the values, so that is not what I am asking here. I am asking about the way to make the distinction legally. Mr. Trask: Let me try one more time on the record, and then if it is not satisfactory... SPECIAL PLANNING 32 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Well, you have to refer to a statute. Committee Chair Chock: Because this is a technical document here and there is a lot of other content to it, I want to move this towards if we are going to hear an amendment to take it out or not. If not, then we are going to move forward. Mr. flask: That is fine. Committee Chair Chock: If you have an answer for her...I just do not think you will at this point. Councilmember Yukimura: It has to be the citation of specific wording. Committee Chair Chock: That is right... Mr. Trask: For that, I do not think that there is...only there is no such thing as "designation," it is not defined in Chapter 7, the General Plan part of the CZO. "Designation is the act of setting aside something or devoting it to a particular purpose. In the legal planning context, it is also `the action of choosing a place for a special purpose or giving it a special status.' " So the General Plan stuff, the general authorization... Councilmember Yukimura: What are you reading from? Mr. Trask: This is just the definition off the internet of what "designation" is. Under statutory construction, if the legal definition is not provided, you use the most commonly used definition. So that was from Wikipedia, so that should be okay. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, if you are... Mr. Trask: I am sorry, real briefly...it is really Chapter 7, General Plan, County of Kauai, Kauai County Code—in total, the process of creating land use designations is the General Plan process, it is the first step in it. It is unstated because that is what it is, in total. You may be overcomplicating it is what I am saying. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. The motion on the table is to amend as circulated. Any further discussion? Councilmember Yukimura: Chair, I move to remove, for further consideration and information, items number 45 and 46. Committee Chair Chock: Is there a second? There is no second. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Motion dies for lack of a second. Council Chair Rapozo: Call for the question. SPECIAL PLANNING 33 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Okay. The motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated"June, 2017,"including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 1 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes, 7:0. We got through one (1) package. Shall we take Amendment#2, Planning? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2, seconded by Councilmember Yukimura. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Kaneshiro: It has eighteen (18) pages to it. Committee Chair Chock: Any questions of the Planning Department on these amendments? They are amending eighteen (18) pages here. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Without going through every single one, this is the first time we have seen them, so if you could just summarize what the changes were and if they were based on meetings or if you left out information that you wanted to add or something like that, just a brief description of what majority of these changes are. Committee Chair Chock: A lot of these are really added words and so forth. MARIE WILLIAMS, Long Range Planner: I think that this amendment package came together exactly as you said, it was throughout the past few months, we realized that when we were here before you and the discussion we had that perhaps some things we did not state as well as we could have and we definitely want to improve how we communicate our laws and our planning system, and some plans and programs as well. So a lot of it really does serve to clarify and hopefully improve what is already in the plan. We definitely were inspired by some of the specific testimony language that came from the Community Coalition Kaua`i (CCK) as well and that is in the tourism proposal. We also realized that in coastal section in the watershed sector that we did not clearly articulate what our federal and state Coastal Zone Management (CZM) program and the related to Special Management Area (SMA) laws, nor did we truly call out our setback laws; we thought it was important to include that. We wanted to factor in the discussion that is ongoing right now, regarding Additional Rental Units (ARUs) because we do talk about the SPECIAL PLANNING 34 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) allowance in our zoning code in the plan, but we felt that was important as well. I would not say that anything is a substantive change and that basically summarizes what we have in here, but we can answer any specific questions that you might have. Mr. Dahilig: I do want to point out, because there was a discussion concerning the Princeville amendment regarding golf course, so I do want to point out item number 31 on page 13. What we were struggling with, because we created a golf course designation to actually try to clearly delineate out from the cultural designation where we have existing golf courses, but we have this rub concerning the operations that occur on a golf course, which include things like concessions, pro shop sales, and restaurants. What we are trying to do is at least provide a descriptor to encompass what goes on in a golf course. There may be some concern about number 31, but if that is the case, then we do not have any objections to that if that is something that needs to be taken out. But what we are trying to do is actually just be realistic and articulate what is actually going on, because we have in our maps, as you may note, clearly earmarked out and separated golf course from the agricultural designation. I do also want to add that on pages 16 through 18, this is language that we worked out with the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) concerning cultural...they had approached us in discussion and we worked with their Government Relations branch to add some amendments at their suggestion, so those from OHA are also included in, between pages 16 through 18. So just as highlights for the Councilmembers' entertainment. Council Chair Rapozo: I have a question on the golf course. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Right now, the golf courses are allowed to have concession and commercial uses, correct? Mr. Dahilig: It is complicated because right now, under our current General Plan, we do not have an actual designation for golf course. Everything is in agriculture. So that commercial usage within the designation for things like concessions and restaurant seem contradictory to agricultural use, and in reality, we do not view golf course usage as a real agricultural use. That is why we created that new designation in the plan. By creating that new designation to try to split it out, we needed to describe what goes on in a golf course. In reevaluating what this language was saying, we realized that some of those activities are actually commercial in nature. We are just trying to provide a very succinct descriptor. I do realize that maybe the words "public amenities" and "related commercial uses," I could probably tighten that up. That is the attempt. Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, because this is so broad that you could have any commercial use at the golf course. I cannot support that. I just do not see why we need to make a special line in there. When they come in to apply for the golf course and they come in to get permitted, there will be conditions and explain what they are going to do. At that time, we have the opportunity to say yes or no. Basically, SPECIAL PLANNING 35 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING this gives them the right to have a commercial operation, which is just too broad for me. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Are these details not to be included maybe in zoning, but not in General Plan designations? Mr. Dahilig: The zoning has to align with the General Plan designation by state law. Councilmember Yukimura: That is when you could specify more clearly what uses and it definitely should be concessions related to golf course, not just general commercial uses. Mr. Dahilig: If it is a concern, we do not have any objections to the Councilmembers taking that amendment out of the packet. I think we understand the concern, I just wanted to make sure that was highlighted, given the discussion on the Princeville amendment. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I have another question. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: On the bottom of page 10 and the top of page 11, you are adding to a list that would set a criteria that are for a performance-based evaluation process for transportation projects, right? Mr. Dahilig: Right. Councilmember Yukimura: I was wondering why we need"c.,"which says, "Priorities identified in community plans and other planning documents." If they follow all of these criteria, then it should be the same. But if they do not, then you set up a conflict with the criteria that are evidenced-based or performance-based. Council Chair Rapozo: Councilmember Yukimura, "c." is not an amendment, it is already there. Councilmember Yukimura: I know. Council Chair Rapozo: If we are going to go through each of these and revisit and not discuss amendments, we will never finish. We have had that discussion. Committee Chair Chock: Understood. Councilmember Yukimura: I am discussing this amendment, Mr. Chair. The amendment adds on "performance-based criteria" and they do not get SPECIAL PLANNING 36 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING implemented if"c." continues to exist. So I am just asking a question after my inquiry. I may have an amendment to suggest. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. As long as we can stay on track for the amendment. Councilmember Yukimura: I am speaking directly to this number amendment. Mr. Dahilig: I think the suggestion with that phrase, "using performance-based evaluation," I think there has been a lot of discussion concerning the County's transportation system and looking at where things are given the limited resources, whether or not a route should or should not be added and I think the desire for performance-based evaluation is something that from an accountability standpoint, we have been hearing as a concern. Whether or not that is in conflict with subparagraph "c." regarding priorities identified in community plans and other planning documents, I think the planning documents are going to be locked in at any given time when they are approved by the Council. That reality of trying something in the plan and evaluating whether it works or does not work is a circular process, it is not linear. You would not say that language negates or creates a conflict in "c.," rather it harmonizes what I believe is an additional evaluation procedure to look at the transportation system and see the performance of the transportation in real time and reevaluate that as how the community plans layout as priorities. So it is one of a culmination of other items that should be looked at, but I do not believe that by adding that language "using a performance-based evaluation process" conflicts with paragraph "c." Councilmember Yukimura: So you have safety in two (2) places? Ms. Williams: I apologize, but I am realizing that the amendment is not quite...what we actually meant to do was to delete the existing"a." through "g." and replace that with items "h." through "m." Councilmember Yukimura: That would make sense. Ms. Williams: Sorry about that. Councilmember Yukimura: If there is concern, can we just pull this one and have them correct it overnight and then bring it back? Committee Chair Chock: We are going to pull them all...all the ones accumulating, we are going to have to look at that. I am anticipating that there will be others. So we will take it out now, but we can still move forward on this document. Councilmember Yukimura: On this packet? I agree. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. So I think we have two (2) so far that need to come out. Anything else? SPECIAL PLANNING 37 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: One being number 23 and 31. Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Any other questions? The Waimea Sports Complex Master Plan—is that a Planning request? Ms. Williams: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: I just want to make sure. Councilmember Yukimura: Did we get feedback about whether our park plan was adopted or not? Can we send a follow-up asking for that information? Committee Chair Chock: I do not recall a response on that one. Councilmember Yukimura: Pardon me? Committee Chair Chock: I do not recall a response on that. Councilmember Yukimura: Can we just send a follow-up? Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any other questions on this amendment? If not, I will entertain a new amendment. Councilmember Yukimura moved to remove #23 and #31 for further consideration, seconded by Council Chair Rapozo. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you for these amendments. There is a lot that I think the Members have asked for in the process that have been addressed here. The motion to remove#23 and#31 for further consideration was then put, and unanimously carried. The motion to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled"Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as amended, as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2, was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: We can go to the next packet. Packet number three passed. We are on packet number four. This is Council Chair Rapozo's first amendment. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 4, seconded by Councilmember Yukimura. Council Chair Rapozo: We could go through each one if you would like, Chair. SPECIAL PLANNING 38 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Please. These are all in support...no, sorry, they are not. Council Chair Rapozo: For#1 and#2, they are supported. It is really just verbiage changes. For #3, Planning does not support. There is no position on number... Committee Chair Chock: #3. Council Chair Rapozo: No, #3...hold on...#3 does not support... Committee Chair Chock: Oh, this is the provisional agriculture one. Council Chair Rapozo: To remove all references to provisional agriculture. I am kind of confused because when Ka aina was here, we had the discussion and he said that they had no opposition to the removal of the provisional. Has that position changed, Mike? Apparently, because he said that there was no... Mr. Dahilig: My apologies if there is some confusion. This is our position, so my apologies. Council Chair Rapozo: So you do not support the removal of provisional? Mr. Dahilig: No, we do not. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. I do not want to get into the debate of what the heck that is. I still do not know what that is, so it makes no sense. I do not know where that came from. I am not going to entertain the discussion. I just would rather... Committee Chair Chock: Well, we have had the discussion. Council Chair Rapozo: We have had it and like I said at the last discussion we had, Ka`aina, the Deputy, said that there was not an issue to remove provisional so that is why it is here and that has changed, so that is fine. For #4, there is no position. Really, just the addition...there is no position by the Planning Department. "Preserve Mand'ulepu, a wahi papa, where scenic landmarks, natural resources, and archaeological sites, including Waiopili Heiau and burials are found along and sustenance fishing, gathering, agriculture, research, education, and recreation." #5, which is a related one, which just talks about "commencing a collaborative planning effort to explore options that would make it possible to preserve the irreplaceable natural and cultural resources of Mand'ulepu..." I apologize for pronouncing it that way, that is just the way I was brought up, I still call it "Mahalepu" and I feel awkward calling it the other way... "and to sustain the special experience of this place." I did want to say before we move on that I had the opportunity to go down there yesterday, along with the Planning Committee Chair, and had a great tour and got to meet Lyda Burney as well as Beryl and the group. SPECIAL PLANNING 39 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING We walked for over five (5) miles yesterday along the beach and through everywhere, but I found out something yesterday that I did not know and it was that whole...what do you call it? Like a preserve or a reserve...there are tortoises out there, native wana, the lo`i, and the cave obviously. We have all heard about...fifty-three (53)years I have been on this earth, on this island, and it was the first time that I got to see a lot of those things that I saw yesterday. What was interesting was what I will call "The Bernie Project" because it is just amazing what is going on down there and to find out that Grove Farm...that is all Grove Farm's land...they own all of that down there, but oftentimes they are "villainized," if that is a word, and everybody just talks so nasty about them. Yesterday, what I found out is that Grove Farm provides the land for no cost and they provide all of the water and it takes a lot of water to maintain that area down there. They provide the insurance, assist with the native planting, and there are a lot of educational school tours that go on down there throughout the year through different organizations and the transportation and the snacks are all provided by Grove Farm. I only bring that up because I did not know that existed and that happened down there. What I learned yesterday...I can only imagine what those kids see when they get down there. I wish I had seen that when I was much younger and maybe my appreciation for that area may have changed or may have been just heightened. I am thankful that is going on and did want to publicly thank Grove Farm for allowing that to happen on that land, because it is quite a significant place. Councilmember Chock had been there before, but I had not. You drive down to wherever you can and go to the place you can jump off that big rock—that was the extent of my visit to Mahaulepu in the past, but yesterday we went into the deep jungles of that valley and I thought it was pretty special. This really just protects that area and preserves that area and I am hoping that we can get support for this. Thank you. That is#4 and#5. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I have a question. Council Chair Rapozo: Go ahead. Councilmember Kaneshiro: For these, there has already been approval of the South Kaua`i Plan; would you say that these are consistent with the South Kaua`i Plan? Again, the way I look at it is that the General Plan is the overarching and you have the South Kauai Plan and all of the other plans. Would you say that this language is consistent with it? Ms. Williams: Well, now that we are on#6, I will just call-out that this language came directly from the South Kauai Plan that was adopted two (2) to three (3) years ago and a lot of work with various stakeholders went into crafting that, so that is actually why we do not support removing the language related to trying to find a way to ensure permanent public access to not only the Maha`ulepu area, but privately-owned areas as well. The management of access also came from the South Kauai Community Plan. I would say that the other two (2) statements are consistent with the South Kaua`i Plan. Councilmember Yukimura: Mr. Chair, I am sorry to have to bring this up, but I think there is a potential conflict of interest. SPECIAL PLANNING 40 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: I think that those are handled in a specific way, so we will follow suit on how it is handled. So either Councilmember Kaneshiro will recuse himself voluntarily or a complaint will need to be filed. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I do not think I have a conflict. It is just general verbiage on it. Councilmember Yukimura: It still involves Grove Farm's land. This is very awkward for me to bring up, but my understanding is if you are in conflict of interest, you cannot be asking questions or even voting on it. Committee Chair Chock: Again, there are two (2) avenues for that to occur. If that is going to happen then maybe that is a consideration after that determination. For all purposes, I would like to...if that is the line of questioning that from my perspective, then I am okay to move forward on it. I think it is a general question as it relates to process. Councilmember Yukimura: It is fine if somebody else asks. Committee Chair Chock: It has been asked. Council Chair Rapozo: What I am hearing is#4 and#5 is in line with the South Kaua`i Plan and item#6 would not be? Okay, thank you. Councilmember Brun: I have a question. Council Chair Rapozo: Go ahead. Councilmember Brun: Basically on #4, #5, and #6, this is us telling Grove Farm that this is what we want on their land and telling them what they can do on their land? I am just trying to understand this. With this new language in here, are we telling Grove Farm, "You cannot do whatever you want with your land and you are going to do what we say as a County"? Mr. Dahilig: When you look at paragraph #5, we have taken a support position because that talks about collaboration and discussion. When it comes to#4, that is why we are taking no position, although we feel that there may be merit behind it that it really does get into a discussion of what happens on a particular landowner's property. So we do not have the information to weigh-in on that point, so that is why we see the merit in it, but we have not been able to go through an evaluation that would lead us one way or the other. It is consistent with the South Kauai Plan because it does look at the areas being a culturally significant area, but the word "preserve" becomes a bit...I guess we do not know how to treat the word "preserve" because of the way the language is written in here. Councilmember Brun: I guess I am struggling with that part where we are trying to tell a landowner...okay...I am not going to support that. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a follow-up question. SPECIAL PLANNING 41 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Councilmember Yukimura: By removing the resort designation in Princeville, we are telling a landowner how we see the land should be used or not used, I thought that community planning is a process that says it is in the public interest to have the land used this way because it is of such high cultural scenic and other value that that is what the goal is. Maybe we have to purchase it from the developer to achieve that goal, but from a public standpoint, this is what we see as the highest and best use of this place from a public planning standpoint. Mr. Dahilig: I think that is why the word "preserve," we are not clear as to whether it means, as you said, purchase it or approach it from a standpoint of stricter regulatory powers. I think that is why we are not entirely clear what the action, because it falls within the action matrix, what exactly is intended by the word "preserve." That is where when we look at paragraph 6 below that talks about elements through that regional planning process, those were action items that arose out of the South Kaua`i Community planning process. Again, we are not suggesting that what you mentioned is or is not of merit. What we are unclear of again is just that phrase "preserve" and in what manner, what does "preserve" mean? Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. To me, this fits with the General Plan vision of what the end in mind is, and then "preserve" means to keep it in its existing state or something close to it in park form or whatever, and how you get there is determined by actions. #6 is about access to the coastline, but it is not really a complete vision of what that place would be for the public, even though there has been a long history of that public vision. Mr. Dahilig: I think that is why we do have a designation that also talks about conservation and that is why we are saying "no position." We are not agreeing or disagreeing with any of the things you are bringing up. I think what we are saying is that that word "preserve" is ambiguous as to what action, because it is in an action matrix, prescribes as a future direction for the regulatory agencies or the legislative body in terms of appropriations. That is all we are saying. Committee Chair Chock: Vice Chair Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: For me, the explanation that Mike gave, to me, makes sense, but it may not be the answer that other Members want to hear. Are we going to try and change Planning's mind here at this table or are we just going to ask the question, accept the answer, and vote? At some point, we need to accept the words and wisdom that comes out of Planning and their work and we have the power to vote whatever way we want, whether we agree or disagree. I think it is just a waste of time to try to change their answer. I think I applaud the answer, whether it is good or bad, say what the answer is from the Planning Department, from the work that they did and let us move on. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. SPECIAL PLANNING 42 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: I just wanted to address Councilmember Brun's question about telling the landowner what to do. I think it is critical to understand that this amendment talks about preservation of Mand'ulepu, not all of Grove Farm's land. It talks about Maha`ulepu, "where scenic landmarks, natural resources, archaeological sites, including the heiau and the burials are found." That is the limit of the amendment. It is not talking about anything else other than those culturally sensitive and important areas and items. It is not talking about the valley or what else they want to do with their land. It talks about preserving...everybody knows what that word is...preserving is preserving. We want to save our cultural resource and save our heiau and burials, we want to save these areas that once they are gone, they are gone. That is all this is talking about and they also add along sustenance fishing and gathering, agriculture, research and education, and recreation. I think that is what we want to do. For me anyway, I would like to preserve those things. That is what we are tasked to do. It is not telling anybody what to do with their land, it is just saying that really this General Plan wants to preserve these types of things and I obviously agree with that. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I just have a clarifying question. I do not know if it is because the numbers ended up the way the numbers are, but is it meant for...#6 is what is currently in it and it reflects the South Kaua`i Plan that has already been passed. Then for #4 and #5, is that meant to replace #4, #5, and #6, or is that coincidence? Council Chair Rapozo: Actually, it was to replace #6, so #4 and #5 was going to replace #6. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Council Chair Rapozo: I think I understand your concern as far as the South Kaua`i Plan, so I guess that is where the decision has to be made. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: Thank you. It says page 176, so I am looking at it now and there is all of the language about burials and archaeological and the wahi pana so I think everything is in there right now, to preserve...I see a lot of "preserve." It is in general, I am just having a hard time just telling directly a person, a landowner to do something on his own land, and it is addressed already in the plan. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any further questions on these? He has more to go through. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: We can technically amend the community plan when the General Plan comes subsequent to the community plan, right? Whatever we do in the General Plan supercedes the community plan, right? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. SPECIAL PLANNING 43 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair, do you want to run through the rest? Council Chair Rapozo: #7 again is basically talking about water with our concerns of water as we went through the General Plan meetings with the Department of Water, so just some text there. Again, the Planning Department supports that language, #8 as well, just adding in"Water is held in trust by the State for the benefit of the people, public trust purposes" and so forth, and again, "specifying some reservations for the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL)." Planning does support that. #9, which is the one that I am kind of confused with, is on page 104—with this one, Planning does not support and this is where I would like some kind of explanation. If you look at (7), "Support the protection, restoration, and enhancement or surface and subsurface water resources, stream, habitats, and priority watershed areas to support; groundwater aquifer recharge; aquatic and environment processes; riparian, scenic, recreational, and Native Hawaiian cultural resources; and constitutionally-protected Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices. (8) Support mauka to makai streamflow, which is essential to the survival of native stream life. (9) Support mediated agreements, such as that in Waimea, to restore streamflows to Wailua River, Hule`ia River, and others, while avoiding costly litigation." This seems pretty reasonable. I am not sure why there is no support. Mr. Dahilig: I guess it is because we are looking at...sorry... Committee Chair Chock: Please. Mr. Dahilig: Because we are looking at it in black-and- white, our concern was one word in paragraph 7, which is the word "priority," and then the last half of paragraph 9, which is "to restore streamflows." In understanding the Public Trust Doctrine concerning how water is managed within our aquifers and within our surface water systems, there are a number of priorities that are outlined, via the pa`akai case and going through Waiola, Molokai, and the Waiahole case. It is not a rubric per se, but what we understand is that there is a balancing that needs to occur between five (5) different uses and the word "priority" in watershed may or may not run afoul of some of those public trust balancing elements. We support mediated agreements and we actually encourage them to try to resolve it, but there is a predisposition to restoring streamflows and that phrase "restoring streamflows" may or may not be consistent with the weighing analysis that accompanies that litany of case law. So whether or not the restoration of the streamflow is or is not warranted, we think that has to be included as the overall discourse with the weighing. It is not to suggest that we do not support the general genre, but we think that it may rub with some of the balancing requirements in all of these public trust case law items. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. I do not see it as that much of a problem. I think priority watershed areas, we should definitely have a priority as it relates to our watershed. I think you said you support the general genre...is that what you said? SPECIAL PLANNING 44 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, you support mediated agreements versus litigation. I think that, to me, is a no-brainer; you want to mediate before you litigate. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: Thank you, Mike. You went into your attorney lingo and now I am lost. For (7), (8), and (9), are you saying that you support it or not? Mr. Dahilig: I would support (7) without the word "priority." Councilmember Kagawa: So you do not support it, because you do not want that word in there? Mr. Dahilig: With (8) it is a given and we support that. It is a given. Councilmember Kagawa: Okay, so you support (8) fully. Okay, take out "priority" for (7). Mr. Dahilig: Number 9, we support mediated agreements and we support avoiding costs and litigation, but the mediated agreement already has a predisposition to restore the streamflow versus going through that analysis and we would encourage going through the analysis. I am sorry to be technical about it. Councilmember Kagawa: I was on the wrong one, so number 7 in 8.9, you want to take out "priority," so going back to the original, the first one from Dr. Vaughan, number 7 on page 3 of 4, you fully support that? Mr. Dahilig: Right. Councilmember Kagawa: That has not changed? Mr. Dahilig: That has not changed. Councilmember Kagawa: Number 8, you fully support that and that has not changed? Mr. Dahilig: Yes, it is reasonable. Councilmember Kagawa: So number 9, you do not support and number A.9, you have some concerns with some wording. Okay. Mr. Dahilig: I do want to suggest that there is precedent for this language, so I do not want to give the suggestion that this is not from left SPECIAL PLANNING 45 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING field; this mimics a suggestion from the research that Dr. Vaughan had done with the Moloka`i Land Use Plan. I think it is not to say that reasonable minds can differ on this, but this is not new language from somewhere. Committee Chair Chock: Yes, Councilmember Kagawa: Do you support#10? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Kagawa: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I guess for #9 and I do not really think "priority" is...I could... Committee Chair Chock: Live without it? Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, if that is the deal-breaker, then...but#9, do you not think that we should be seeking to restore streamflows? Do you not think that is something that we should be looking for as we move forward? You made it sound like it is a bad thing to restore a streamflow, but I do not see the negativity. I think that we should look to restore the streamflows, and in that process, look to mediation versus litigation. That was my interpretation. Mr. Dahilig: I agree to some extent that restoration of streamflows is a goal, but it has to be a goal consistent with what we understand as the five (5) uses aligned under the Public Trust Doctrine case law. Whether or not full restoration or partial restoration is entertained, that is where the phrase "restore streamflows" is broad. Again, reasonable minds can differ on the tightness of it. That is the only thing we were pointing out that we feel the mediated agreement, should in the spirit of it, contain that weighing analysis as outlined by the courts. Council Chair Rapozo: I do not understand a word you said. I just asked a simple question and a yes or no would be sufficient, but do you not think we are legally, lawfully, constitutionally possible...I am not telling you to go break the law or violate a Supreme Court decision. I am just saying would it not be a goal for this County to restore streamflows where legally possible, where we can? I cannot understand how we would not support that. Mr. Dahilig: We are obligated by law to restore streamflows where necessary. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay, and this just says that we would support mediated agreements versus litigation. Obviously, this does not mean to go against the law. SPECIAL PLANNING 46 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: Well, I do not want to give the misimpression that we are not supporting the intent of it. Council Chair Rapozo: No, you give me that impression because it says here "Do not support." That is how I get that impression because you are telling me you do not support it. Mr. Dahilig: I get it and I think a lot of it was in the reaction to try to be able to clearly state a position or that it was a flag. We did not articulate it much. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Could you maybe perhaps clearly explain some of the unintended consequences that could come with this? Could this perhaps dry up agricultural land that is dependent on streamflow? Could it hinder any renewable energy project? Can you help make it clear what some of the unintended consequences are? Because I know some farmers are dependent on some of the streamflows, so make it clear to us from your point of view on what some of those consequences could be. Mr. Dahilig: I think the clearest example that...it has been in the news and it was the headline this past week, was the approval of a diversion by the Board of Land and Natural Resources to move water into hydroelectric power. So that news can be characterized as consistent among the five (5) public trust uses that are priority. At the end of the day, if there is a competition between those five (5) uses, it has to go through a balancing act. So that diversion of water that is being siphoned off to create the hydroelectric power is also needed by farmers downstream to grow their halo, that want to expand the halo. Because the water is a finite resource at the end of the day, that restoration of the streamflow is a relative question that has to be weighed. That is why as much as I would like it to be a very simple thing because of the water law and how it affects everybody, the way the courts have set it up has created this intricate weighing analysis where things like the diversion for hydroelectric power and things like growing halo have to essentially be in the same form. If restoring streamflow was in a language like this, it could mean and be interpreted down the line is that, "Okay, we can prioritize growing halo and getting water downstream to the downstream users versus hydroelectric power." That is why we think that the best way to resolve that is not in court, but through a mediated discussion and avoiding litigation. Council Chair Rapozo: Which is what this says. Mr. Dahilig: Which is what it says, absent that one phrase. Council Chair Rapozo: Do you have another question, Vice Chair? SPECIAL PLANNING 47 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: For me, I am kind of struggling with this, Mike. We are having this discussion and it makes it seem as though the County Planning Department or whoever controls the streamflow, when in fact, it is the State Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM), right? Do they read the General Plan and make their decisions? I do not want to spend a lot of time worrying about a word or two when basically they will make whatever decision they come up with upon their own analysis and we are banging our heads here, as though one (1) word or two (2), like "priority" is really going to change the whole game. Mr. Dahilig: The downstream consequence of this is...as much as it may not necessarily involve our department from the initial action, the trickle-down effect of it could mean potentially that the domestic water resource could be lowering the priority and effect development. So when we look at "restore streamflows to Wailua River,"what that could mean is because there is that diversion that pulls water away, and then as it further gets down, the ditches feed the surface water treatment plant, there could be a tension where you are juxtaposing...you are rubbing this issue of how our department could be involved in being able to implement the land use map as proposed. So in general, yes, we need to be able to balance all of these issues, but what ends up happening is by making it a stated priority that we are restoring the streamflows, it could run contrary to the ability to develop some of the lands earmarked for things like housing or further items. A statement by the County, I do not think it is necessarily a bad thing, but I think it just needs to be with some caution. That is all. Councilmember Kagawa: Can you help us with some language that perhaps could bring us the win-win on this item? Mr. Dahilig: We can definitely work on something if that is... Councilmember Kagawa: I actually understood ten percent (10%) of what you said. Mr. Dahilig: Okay. I am sorry. Councilmember Kagawa: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Mike, there a hesitancy to lock-in to restore streamflows...that word is...the mediated agreement might not be to restore streamflow, but to share the streamflow. That might be the mediated agreement and I think that is what you are trying to tell us, is that that language locks us into the mediated agreement saying that it is just going to restore our streamflow and that means perhaps nobody gets any of the water. In a perfect world, we would be able to use that stream for multiple purposes, because at the end of the day, it flows right out to the ocean. So the mediated agreement might be a diversion to the kalo farmers, a diversion to the hydroelectric plant, but I think from what I am hearing from sitting here is that you do not want to lock it in that the only mediated agreement is for the SPECIAL PLANNING 48 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING restoration of the streamflow, because it could be a diversion for a public purpose and public good. Mr. Dahilig: I agree. If we were to go and suggest maybe just a slight adjustment to the language in paragraph 5, it would state "to balance the needs of all public trust users." I do not dispute that restoration of streamflow is assisting a public trust user, but there are a myriad of public trust users. So that is where I think in getting to how and who gets water, I think that balancing discussion is the best way to approach it, through mediated agreement. Councilmember Kawakami: Okay. Thank you, Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I am just going to ask you real quick, so this really is not really a Planning issue or a Planning matter at this point? Committee Chair Chock: There is some discrepancy from a legal standpoint that Mauna Kea points out. The bottom line is that we have a couple of options here: one, as introducer, you could feel willing to work with Mike and the Planning Department on these two areas. I can tell you that I am supportive of all of your amendments as it is. I will look at whatever is worked through with Planning. We could actually take these three (3) out if you wanted to and run them that way as well. Council Chair Rapozo: Again, "priority" for me is not a deal-breaker. But for 9, for me, it needs to be intact. I do not see any negative collateral damage from restoring a streamflow. I think Councilmember Kawakami kind of explained it quite well when you go through a mediation process and you agree on how you divvy up the water versus litigation. I just cannot imagine how...Mike did a great "what if' and lawyers do that. If he was going to defend my position, I am sure he could put up a good argument supporting my position. I just think we overcomplicate these things. We are trying to say, "Hey, we want to restore our streamflows and while we are restoring streamflows, we do not want to go to court, we want to do it on a table somewhere, like we usually do." That is how this thing is intended. We are going deep into the text and the potential "what ifs." I could do that with every single amendment in this pack. That is the intent. We want to restore streamflows and we want to do it without going through court. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, so just the mediated one is the one in question. Mauna Kea, it is not always we get more clarity with legal analysis, but let us try. Mr. Trask: For the record, Mauna Kea Trask, County Attorney. I just want to state that it is not correct to say that what can generally be described as environmental and non-development uses of a resource is a public trust use or commercial and development use is not. The public trust is a legal term in which the state holds the natural resources of the state, including land, water, air, minerals, and energy sources for the public. That is the public trust. Under Article 11, Section 1, it says, "For the benefit of the present future generations, the state and its political subdivision..." so it is appropriate for the County to look at SPECIAL PLANNING 49 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING public trust... "shall preserve and protect Hawai`i's natural beauty and all natural resources, including land, water, air, minerals, and energy sources and shall promote the development and utilization of these resources in a manner consistent with their conservation and in furtherance of the self-sufficiency of the state. All public natural resources are held in trust by the state for the benefit of the people." So it is not one use is not to the other, it is just all of it is within the public trust. To further back up Chair's statement regarding water resources, Article 11, Section 7 of the Constitution specifically states, "The State has an obligation to protect, control, and regulate the use of Hawai`i's water resources for the benefit of its people." Again, that is not to the exclusion of affordable housing and anything else, but "the legislature shall provide for water resources agency..." CWRM... "which as provided shall set overall water conservation quality use policies et cetera." I just want to clarify that for the record that water in a stream is not a public trust use necessarily. Water is held in a public trust. I think that is important to say. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Any further questions? Was that helpful? Councilmember Kagawa: I have a suggestion that we vote on it ad seriatim. Council Chair Rapozo: I agree. Committee Chair Chock: I would entertain a motion for that if possible. Council Chair Rapozo: Can we just finish#10? Committee Chair Chock: I am sorry, yes. Council Chair Rapozo: For #10, this one is in support and this is to just "encourage the expansion of programs and legislation supporting septic systems in place of cesspools location within 200 feet of a shoreline, perennial stream, or wetland." Again, this is like us telling someone what to do. That is what general plans...I appreciate Planning's support on this one because I think this is important. We wonder where all of this bacteria is coming from. There is really no identifiable activity in the area except cesspools. So I think this is a great addition. Thank you, Planning, for support this. Committee Chair Chock: I am forced to take a caption break right now, so we will come back to this in ten (10) minutes. There being no objections, the meeting recessed at 3:13 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 3:27 p.m., and proceeded as follows: Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. We are back from our caption break. Before we move on to any more votes, I just have to go through the process and put some things on the record. I just wanted to check-in again with the public and the process we went through because I want to establish where we need to go in SPECIAL PLANNING 50 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING providing the opportunity. So we allowed public testimony at the very beginning of the meeting this morning, and then we introduced all nine (9) amendment packets so that everyone could receive a copy to review. Then we went to lunch, and upon our return from lunch, we offered, after the certificate, to open it up for a second time for public testimony and that opportunity. At that time, I did ask and no one wanted to speak at that time. I think the interest has been, even though it was just by a show of hands, that they wanted to hear discussion to move forward. Accordingly, we announced that we would be willing to continue our work, including beginning to vote on amendments. We also explained that although we would begin voting, we would still have an opportunity to reconsider any vote that we have made. I just want to make clear that we offered to accept the public testimony before we began voting and everyone was present and waived that opportunity at that time. What we will do is the best thing for us is to accept all remaining public testimony now that everyone has a chance to receive the amendments tomorrow morning; that way, everyone has a specific time they can come back to and that will be...what time do we start tomorrow? 8:30 a.m. again? There is a Special Council Meeting first thing at 8:30 a.m. so that could take us anywhere from half an hour to forty-five (45) minutes I am thinking. So right after that, as soon as we reconvene this meeting, we will be taking the public testimony at that time, so we can expect around 9:00 a.m. or 9:15 a.m. or thereafter. Councilmember Kagawa: Can I ask that tomorrow Members be considerate, because there is going to be a lot of people that come for the General Plan, so I know that we have some issues with it, but let us try to at least get it done within half an hour, hopefully before. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Regarding? Councilmember Kagawa: It is regarding the Mayor's decision to give two (2) days for Administrative Leave to the County employees, he is being "Santa Claus." Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Speaking of Christmas, there is also the Holly Jolly event that is happening across the street and I know that the Planning Department has annually participated in that, but to whatever degree, we will have some representation to help us get through these amendments. Of course, we know that the focus and commitment is here, but I know I also wanted to be sensitive what is happening festively. Councilmember Yukimura: What time is the Holly Jolly? Committee Chair Chock: I do not know. Mr. Dahilig: 10:00 a.m. SPECIAL PLANNING 51 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Okay. That would be the second and final opportunity tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. I just wanted to make sure that was clear with everyone. I want to restate that tomorrow's Special Planning Committee Meeting will be 8:30 a.m. or thereafter, just for technically purposes. We are going to start our Special Council Meeting at 8:30 a.m. and have testimony first thing in the morning. With that, we are back to these amendments here and I think there has been some work. Council Chair, do you have a suggestion? Council Chair Rapozo: I guess the first thing is that we are going to take it ad seriatim, right? I think that was the request, so we can start with that motion. Councilmember Yukimura: For#7, right? Councilmember Kaneshiro: Would we not be taking each number in seriatim? Some say "support" and some say "do not support." Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, I would suggest doing each one. The only other thing is I made the motion to amend as circulated as it relates to #9, the Planning Director has voiced its concern about the term "priority" and I do not have a problem removing that, so I would entertain a friendly amendment to remove "priority" out of #7 before "watershed," and then as far as #9, "support mediated agreements such as that in Waimea to restore streamflows to meet public trust purposes." So to add"to meet public trust purposes" after streamflows and that would gain the support of the Planning Director and the Planning Department and I really do not have a problem with that. I think that clarifies what the intent was. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Amendment #4, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Committee Chair Chock: It was a friendly amendment to amend the amendment. Okay. I need a motion to take it in seriatim. Can I have that? Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to vote on all items in Amendment #4 in seriatim, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes to vote in seriatim. Madam Clerk, can you take us through each one of the amendments? Ms. Tabalba: Okay. This is for #1 of the Amendment, roll call vote. Committee Chair Chock: Actually, why do we not do it together and then we can take roll calls on the ones that need to. The motion to approve Item #1 of Amendment #4 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes on this. SPECIAL PLANNING 52 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING The motion to approve Item #2 of Amendment #4 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: #2 passes. Can we do a roll call for#3? Council Chair Rapozo: Is this the removal of"provisional"? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Council Chair Rapozo: Just so that I understand, #3 was the amendment to remove all references to provisional agriculture and provisional resort. Committee Chair Chock: Yes, back to agriculture. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Can we have discussion? Committee Chair Chock: Go ahead. Councilmember Kaneshiro: On this one, I think we had a lot of information. We talked about it for a long time on provisional. I understand that need for provisional. I will be voting to keep provisional in it. The provisional was the understanding that this is, like I would say typical to the Princeville vote that we would have got if we did not get any direction on it. It would have been a gray vote, nobody would win or lose, because there are some people that wanted it and some people that did not. The Planning Department came and said that they are putting the provisional in because it is an area where they did not get clear direction from the community on which way they want to go and they are going to wait until the community plan comes through and that is an area where you know, it is provisional, this is what it is. That is a section where the community is going to have to decide on what it is. For me, I am completely fine with that understanding. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any further discussion? Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: This is one of the other topics that came up with the community on the west side that said they vetted this and they asked for this to stay and that this is one of the priority language pieces that they wanted to see in, so I am going to support the work that was done, the voice of the west side community to keep it in provisional, and I do not see any reason to remove this. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I think there may have been a really strong west side desire for provisional resort in Waimea, but I do not think there was a strong community desire for provisional agriculture in `Ele`ele. Furthermore, if it does not mean anything, why should we put it in? The community can consider it when they come up to their community plan. They can put it in if they want to. Provisional agriculture furthermore is a misnomer. Provisional resort is clear that it SPECIAL PLANNING 53 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING is moving toward resort. Provisional agriculture is a total deception because it is actually moving toward urban and it is not made clear in that. If it will help, I will ask that we take provisional agriculture and provisional resort separately because I think there is a different dynamic on each of them. Do you not want it? Committee Chair Chock: I want to vote on what we have here before we amend anything else. Councilmember Yukimura: I just think there are different forces on each one. Either way, to me, it does not matter if it is going to be decided at a community plan level. You can do whatever you want to at the community level, because it does not mean anything. It does not give any rights or say anything. Why put it in? Rather, let us be honest. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Further discussion? Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I am not going to argue back and forth, but I think provisional provides a flag for the community to know that this is an area that we are going to have to get together and figure out what we are going to want to do with it and I am okay with provisional, however it is written right now, without changing agriculture or resort. I am fine. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: I just want to say that with respect to `Ele`ele and Hanapepe, provisional agriculture says, which is really provisional urban, does not really look at where the growth could go in old town Hanapepe where you could go back to commercial and residential. We are adopting this policy about compact development, but it is spreading it out. It makes no sense at all and it does not really give the community all the true options. It is actually selecting one option over another without any discussion about the alternatives. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Council Chair Rapozo. Council Chair Rapozo: No. I am just sighing because we went through this already. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Roll call. The motion to approve Item #3 of Amendment #4 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM#3: Yukimura, Rapozo, Chock TOTAL— 3, AGAINST ITEM#3: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL— 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. Committee Chair Chock: That amendment fails. We are on page 2, #4. SPECIAL PLANNING 54 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kaneshiro: I will be recusing myself from this. I do not think I have a conflict based on our code of ethics, but being threatened with having to go to the Board of Ethics on a vote like this, which...if I jump out, I do not think my vote will matter. It will go 3:3 or 2:4 or whatever, but I just do not think it is worth the fight for me to have to go to the Board of Ethics, so I will be recusing myself on#4, #5, and#6. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura. (Councilmember Kaneshiro was noted as recused and left the meeting.) Councilmember Yukimura: I just want to remember that when we were in campaign, Councilmember Kaneshiro said that if there was any question, he would ask for an opinion from the Board of Ethics. Committee Chair Chock: And he has recused himself from this process. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, I appreciate that very much. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion on#4? Roll call. The motion to approve Item#4 of Amendment#4 was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#4: Kawakami, Yukimura, Rapozo, Chock TOTAL— 4, AGAINST ITEM#4: Brun, Kagawa TOTAL— 2, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: Kaneshiro TOTAL— 1. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Let us go to #5. This has Planning's support. Do we need to take a roll call? The motion to approve Item#5 of Amendment#4 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:0:0:1 (Councilmember Kaneshiro was recused). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Kaneshiro is recused. Let us go to#6. We will take this one as a roll call, please. The motion to approve Item#6 of Amendment#4 was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#6: Kawakami, Yukimura, Rapozo, Chock TOTAL — 4, AGAINST ITEM#6: Brun, Kagawa TOTAL — 2, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: Kaneshiro TOTAL— 1. Committee Chair Chock: . Motion passes. SPECIAL PLANNING 55 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING (Councilmember Kaneshiro was noted as present.) Committee Chair Chock: We are on #7 of Amendment #4. This one should be okay. The motion to approve Item #7 of Amendment #4 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are on #8. The Planning Department is in support as well. The motion to approve Item #8 of Amendment #4 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are on #9, as amended. Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: For me, I have seen that Maui has problems with litigation now. It is CWRM's decision. Although, I believe this amendment and I want this amendment to hold true, I was born and raised here and grew up in the rivers of Hanapepe and Waimea. On the same token, I know that there is a bigger picture when deciding water flow. For me, I do not want to make a decision that impacts litigation down the line that conflicts with decisions that CWRM made and then we have communities tied up in lawsuits. Sometimes, we have to listen to what Planning says. Planning says, "Yes, we agree, too, but perhaps maybe this amendment is not going to be so helpful towards achieving our goals. It is going to perhaps lead to more problems." I saw what Bill No. 2491 did and sometimes good intentions can actually have bad consequences. So I will not be supporting this. Thank you, Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Were you in the room when we did the amendment to the Amendment? You might have not been... Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, I was. Council Chair Rapozo: We removed "priority" and we added in the text "to meet public trust purposes" and that did get the support of Mike. Councilmember Kagawa: I am still hesitant about having language in regarding water. It is important, but I think CWRM has the call on waterflow and I find it dangerous and reckless to have language that addresses that when it is really our job to collaborate with CWRM if we have issues, but I do not think we should put it in the General Plan. Again, sometimes good intentions can have bad consequences. I understand other Members and Planning's desire to have it in. It is what it is. I am entitled to my opinion. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. SPECIAL PLANNING 56 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: I just want to clarify what the amendment was to #9. It will read now "support mediated agreements such as that in Waimea, to restore streamflows to meet the public trust doctrine to Wailua River, Hule`ia River, and others." That does not make sense. Committee Chair Chock: "Public trust purposes." Councilmember Yukimura: Even that does not make sense because you are separating "streamflows to Wailua River and Hule`ia River." "Restore streamflows to meet the public trust purposes to Wailua River, Hule`ia River..." Maybe that does...so you are going to meet the "public trust purposes" to "the river." Or "of the river"? Committee Chair Chock: Is it "of' or "to"? Councilmember Yukimura: Maybe "for." Council Chair Rapozo: Makes sense to me. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Thank you, Mr. Chair and thank you to Dr. Mehana Vaughan. I was going to vote against this because I had my concerns about the ability for people to use specific and explicit language to say, "Nobody is going to share the water." That was my big concern, but I think with the amendments that were proposed, it will support my position, so I can support this amendment moving forward. Thank you. Council Chair Rapozo: Let us change it to "for." Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend the language in Item #9 relating to action A.9. to "Support mediated agreements, such as that in Waimea, to restore streamflows to meet public trust purposes for Wailua River, Huleia River, and others, while avoiding costly litigation," seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. The motion to approve Item #9 of Amendment #4, as amended, was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#9: Kawakami, Yukimura, Rapozo, Chock TOTAL — 4, AGAINST ITEM#9: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro TOTAL — 3, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. SPECIAL PLANNING 57 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #10 of Amendment #4 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Next Amendment, Amendment #5. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Bill No. 2666, as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Yukimura: I was just thinking that maybe we would want more time to read it overnight because it is very substantive. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, let me at least share. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Council Chair Rapozo: There has been a lot of talk about moratoriums over the General Plan update discussion and people throwing that word out like it is something in our toolbox that we can just do, that the Council, because we feel like it or because a specific community wants a moratorium, we can just come over here, get four (4) votes, and get a moratorium. I have tried to explain on numerous occasions that there is a lot of legal parameters involving moratoriums. So our County Attorney worked alongside with the Coalition and came up with some language, and I wanted to highlight some of this language, because when you hear the word "moratorium," people get scared, and me included, because I do not want to get sued and be accused of a taking, but I just highlighted some of the text because I wanted to make sure people understood why I believe the amendment is necessary. I am going to read this, Committee Chair, with your indulgence because I think it is critical that the people understand why. I am not going to read everything, but just what I believe clarifies the reason: "Generally where such moratoria..." I guess that is plural for "moratorium." ... "are directly linked to environmental emergency such as flood districts, an unhealthy sewage treatment system or the inability to finance facility expansion, such moratoria may survive judicial scrutiny. However, where the moratoria are not of limited duration, and not tied to a reasonable plan to permit and facilitate growth, they are subject to invalidation. Similarly, moratoria may be invalid as applied where administered in a discriminatory manner allowing exemption or preexisting claims of entitlement other than on an even-handed basis. The County of Kauai realizes that moratoria are drastic techniques. According to legal treatises on the matter, communities imposing moratoria should be aware that they may tend to discourage quality developments needed for tax-base enhancement and achievement of regional planning goals; deny needed housing; inflate existing housing prices, commercial rentals, and industrial property; and discourage industrial in-migration; while encouraging employment relocation from the community towards areas with cheaper land and available housing for workers. Nonetheless, when used appropriately they can be an important tool and may provide an appropriate interim measure to better plan for the future development of Kaua`i." SPECIAL PLANNING 58 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING I want to really make it clear that this does not give the Council any more authority than they already have. It does not give anybody an advantage or more of an ability or authority to do a moratorium. It just kind of spells out what is required, which I think needs to be in this plan so that the public understands that it is not just a free tool that we can create a moratorium because we feel like it. More importantly—on page 3 of 17—"All existing zoning amendment ordinances, including but not limited to all existing land use permits, and all existing subdivisions, shall continue to remain in effect following the enactment of the General Plan. Existing land use regulations, including, but not limited to..." Councilmember Yukimura: Where are you reading? Council Chair Rapozo: Page 3 of 17. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Council Chair Rapozo: "Existing land use regulations, including, but not limited to those in the Special Development Plans, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and the Subdivision Ordinance, shall continue to regulate the use of land within demarcated zoning districts until such time as the ordinances may be amended to be consistent with the General Plan." I want to make it clear that this does not provide the Council with any more authority than they currently have. We are not making it easier. We are spelling out that we are concerned, that in fact, that opportunity exists, but it also states the legal parameters that what we face if, in fact, we go and do a moratorium. That is my amendment. I know it is difficult. I do not have a problem if you folks want to wait to hold it off until tomorrow, but I did want to make points as to why this was in there. It scared a lot of people, but at the end of the day, I would rather have it clarified in the General Plan than having people misled to believe that we can just do a moratorium. I would welcome Planning's reason for not supporting it as well. Committee Chair Chock: Why do we not start with Planning...let me interject first...I got a note here...I just want to clarify and this is probably the worst thing to do, to tell Beryl Blaich that she cannot testify and I know it might have been my bad in terms of directions, but there are two (2) options that we have had for testimony, which was at the frontend today and then also at the very end of our process. It will happen tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. and I apologize. Planning, are you ready to respond to your dissention against this amendment? Mr. Dahilig: I think we recognize that moratoria are legal. However, whether it is within the realm of the toolbox and should be employed is always something that we are really cautious about. Throughout our department's history, over the past...five (5) or seven (7) years ago, we had to deal with a moratorium-type of situation where ultimately we went to the Federal Court and we lost and had a portion of our Charter invalidated. So we do not disagree necessarily with the language in paragraph 1 that recounts when moratoria should be used or how they are used and recognizing what type of circumstance does necessitate a need for it. That being said, I think our concern was really with the last line, in terms of characterizing moratoria as an "important tool." We do not necessarily think of it as SPECIAL PLANNING 59 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING an "important tool." We think of it as an authority that the Council does have and we agree with pretty much the rest of the language other than that characterization that moratoria are an important tool. So I think that, in and of itself, is our concern with paragraph 1. I think when we look at paragraph 2, we are in support of that language. We think it recounts the overall intent behind the authority of the Council, so we do not believe that the laws that are being passed get subverted as a consequence of one change or another. Essentially, it is good language. When it comes to the rest of the items that do get into this discussion of moratoria, I think the eye of what is adequate and that phrase "adequate"—you can look through paragraphs 3- 11. The word "adequate" is what we are a bit concerned about, because the word "adequate" is in the eye of the beholder. A moratorium is an extraordinary circumstance or an extraordinary set of issues and by saying that there is adequate environmental impact data does not recognize the latter part of the paragraph that relates to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through comprehensive capital facilities fund. So they have to work in tandem. Essentially, what I understand from Chair Rapozo's amendment is that there has to be evidence that is proposed to trigger the moratorium and the moratorium would have to then be paired with another action with the legislative body. Ultimately, at the end of the day, development is a very messy thing and what has happened and what is also very apparent throughout some of the policies in this plan is that the infrastructure that needs to be built on the island is being pushed towards a realm of exactions, or that when you develop something, you help expand the system if you are going to develop and create that mitigation or that way to say, "Okay, if I am going to build twenty (20) homes, you have to help widen the street." When you look at the areas that this does touch, for instance, like roads, it presupposes that the County is going to take responsibility for all of the financial...the way that it is written right now is when it says, "...to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget"—that is like the chicken and the egg discussion when you are talking about expansion of the system, because a lot of our system and capacity these days is actually as a consequence of allowing development. If you provide a moratorium and pair it with that, you actually do not have the opportunity to exact. For us, when we are looking at it, we do not dispute the fact that the Council has authority to enact this law, we just think that from an execution standpoint, it could be froth for the inadvertent ability to actually stall any type of development or growth from the island. So I think that is why we are not supportive of the way it is written right now. Committee Chair Chock: I do have a question. I know the County Attorney worked on this language with the Coalition and yourself and in regards as it is broken out into the different amendments, like say #12, #13, and so forth, was that also a part of the County Attorney's work as well? Council Chair Rapozo: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: So all of this was County Attorney? Council Chair Rapozo: Well, all of this as it relates to the moratoria. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. SPECIAL PLANNING 60 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: Yes. I cannot claim any credit for this, but I will say...I listen to Mike and I hear Mike and I actually hear that he supports it, but he is not supporting it. "Adequate"—I do not know...if we add"if supported by legally adequate environmental impact data." Some of these things goes without saying. I think we understand that the Council has to follow the legal justifications if the Council, at that time, decides they want to do a moratorium. I think that goes without saying. It is clear in the first paragraph the legal requirements, what it would take, and what the risks are. The rest of them pertains to the separate areas of the General Plan. I am not sure what we could change in there in order to get their approval, but it sounded like he approves the intent, just maybe he is concerned about the term "adequate." Well, "adequate"is whatever is legal. At that point, we will get the Office of the County Attorney, whoever is the County Attorney, to make that determination if the Council's action is legal or not. That is going to happen. This is basically just putting it in the General Plan so that that tool is available. Whether it is in the General Plan or not, it does not impact the ability to use it. I will just go over B.-3., "Conduct periodic environmental impact reports that analyze whether or not there are water shortages within the upper watershed." This is pertaining to the upper watershed. #4 pertains to the middle watershed. #5 pertains to the kahakai or coastal areas of the shoreline. It all comes back to the same justification. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Sorry. I agree that a moratorium is an important interim measure. In fact, several years ago, I proposed one for Po`ipu, which resulted in the Multimodal Land Transportation Plan happening. I am not sure that...it feels like maybe this is a legal paper that is part of the addendum to the General Plan, and then a paragraph about a moratorium as being a legitimate interim tool when things have gotten out of control and you have development exceeding infrastructure limits. I think this is a way to legitimize moratorium as a legitimate tool and I believe it is true. Committee Chair Chock: Is that a question for Planning? Councilmember Yukimura: It is a suggestion for where it might be placed. Committee Chair Chock: I think there is one suggestion right now, based on the amendment, so if you are asking to... Councilmember Yukimura: I am putting up the idea for some input. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any input on that? Vice Chair? Councilmember Kagawa: I think we should just sleep on this and deal with it tomorrow. Committee Chair Chock: It is a big one and I do not mind it. There are other sections to this. SPECIAL PLANNING 61 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: The public might chime in in the morning and they may have to watch the tape back to listen to what Mike said because he gave a lot of information. Just for me, it was too much to process. I saw the Punahou folks back there nodding, so they heard it. Maybe we can pass out this one and maybe the next one might be faster. Committee Chair Chock: I would like to honor that, but I want to check in with the rest of the Committee Members, if that is feasible for you to defer this package until tomorrow. Councilmember Yukimura: I think it is wise to do that. Council Chair Rapozo: The whole package or just that one? Committee Chair Chock: I am sorry, we have this moratoria, but we also have Watershed. Is that your interest? There is also Energy Sustainability and Tourism. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, I meant the Moratorium. The public can see which ones Planning supports and does not support and maybe tomorrow they might want to shed some information on that as they testify. I do not know. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Let us move to the second one. Council Chair Rapozo: Page 9 of 17, the watershed, Planning does concur. It is just some changes in the language. #13, they do not support and I am assuming because of not so much a., but probably or the latter part of a. on page 10, "To identify and restore traditional cultural access to and uses of freshwater resources; and 3) To identify and mitigate impacts from the built environment that are disruptive to the natural hydrology of the watershed and access to water as a cultural resource." These are things that we should be doing anyway. That is what counties should be doing, whether it is the Department of Water or whoever. We should be doing these things. I am not sure why we even have to spell it out in the General Plan. "b. Establish a watershed liaison within the County whose mission is to facilitate better communication and coordination between agencies and organizations that work in the watershed (County, State, and nongovernmental organizations), applying a western-based science and ahupua'a management model from mauka to makai." "c. Support the establishment of community-based watershed councils, using ahupua`a as a guiding principal, to assist with watershed management issues." "d. Restore water flow to streams, such as the north fork of Wailua and Hule`ia, in order to uphold county obligations and public trust protections." That is#13. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: About "c." the establishment of community- based watershed councils, I know that when I had some discussions with the SPECIAL PLANNING 62 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING community groups, we talked about not wanting to proliferate a lot of different councils and we talked about there already being a watershed alliance that was started by Ernie Lau in the Department of Water that brought in landowners of watershed property...I think Grove Farm is a member...and the idea of having too many councils kind of acting separately, not being a really good way to try to do management, if that is the purpose of the council, I am not clear what is the purpose. Maybe it is advisory or what? Anyway, I think having some clarification would be helpful about the purpose and about the idea of putting the groups together so that there is just not a whole lot of different groups trying to impact the same subject. Committee Chair Chock: So are you supportive of the establishment of... Councilmember Yukimura: I am wanting some discussion on this. Committee Chair Chock: So are you looking for more detailed information as it relates to this if you were to support it? Councilmember Yukimura: I am looking for an amendment that will address some of the concerns that I just expressed. Council Chair Rapozo: If I may, Mr. Chair, this is a general plan...a General Plan saying that we should support the establishment of community-based watershed councils. That will be defined at a later time. I do not think this General Plan should be so specific and define how we are going to pick them, how many, and where it is going to be. That is for a later time. It is just saying that we want to go back to the community-based watershed councils, which we once enjoyed and we no longer have. Again, it is up to the individual Members, if that is what they support or not or want more detail. I am not going to give more detail, that is kind of the general philosophy going forward and that will be determined at a later time. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, well"principal" is misspelled. It should be "principle." Committee Chair Chock: I have a couple of questions from Mike. Go ahead. Councilmember Kaneshiro: My initial thought on it and I guess we can get...Planning does not support it...a lot of these are just kind of wordsmithing some of the sections. For me, I am fine with the way the plan is without this additional information, so I will be voting against this amendment. Committee Chair Chock: Any further questions? Mike, maybe you can walk through as you have in the past. Mr. Dahilig: Okay. The phrase starting with paragraph 3, subsection a., when it talks about the objective, the phrase "protect, restore, and enhance freshwater resources" and then the phrase "conform with their natural hydrological function and flow within the watershed topography"—we believe that SPECIAL PLANNING 63 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING this could inadvertently take the water that is going through artificial ditches, like irrigation ditches or diversions for hydroelectric power or for domestic water use that the phrase "natural hydrological function" means restoring it to pretty much a virgin environment and we believe that is not practical. That is our (inaudible) with that, the phrase "natural hydrology" or "natural topography" because it really could inadvertently get the document pulled into a water debate between competing uses on agricultural lands, domestic water use, et cetera. Paragraph b., again the phrase "watershed liaison," we like the idea, but we are not sure whether that has fiscal implications or not for the County. We do not oppose based on that, but we believe that it relates to comes clarification. So paragraph c., we do not necessary see an issue with the establishment of councils. We think community-based management is an efficient and appropriate way to dispute or resolve things. When you get to paragraph d., restore water flow to streams, we would suggest possibly normalizing this language with the previous amendment that was adopted just in Amendment#4, the fourth package. Committee Chair Chock: Is the watershed councils not already called that in the plan? Mr. Dahilig: The councils are, but there is a liaison...that phrase "liaison" is what we are not quite clear on. Committee Chair Chock: Yes, I was thinking about "c." Mr. Dahilig: It says "or liaison." Council Chair Rapozo: Is "liaison" not in the existing language? Mr. Dahilig: We are running into a normalization issue between what the language is in... Council Chair Rapozo: What is a normalization issue? What does that mean? I do not know what that means. Mr. Dahilig: I am sorry, there is an inconsistency. We say "establish a watershed task force or watershed liaison within the County," and then it says "establish a watershed liaison." We just maybe need to put the phrase "task force or liaison" maybe? Council Chair Rapozo: What? Mr. Dahilig: A "task force or liaison." If you look at page 99, paragraph C.3. This particular language deals with 104 C.3. Actually, the amendment is not quite... Council Chair Rapozo: I do not have the plan in front of me, but I believe it currently says "establish a watershed liaison." Mr. Dahilig: Yes... SPECIAL PLANNING 64 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: Now do you see why I am confused, Mike? Mr. Dahilig: Yes, my apologies. Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, just tell me why it is wrong. You are creating an issue that is not there. If someone else introduced it, then maybe it would get your support? Mr. Dahilig: Please do not take it that way, Sir. Council Chair Rapozo: You are saying something that is not existing. Mr. Dahilig: I was corrected by Marie when I looked at this and what should be the correct response on our behalf is that it should be normalized with language on C.3. on page 99 because it talks about a watershed task force or watershed liaison. This was evaluated in a bubble. My apologies. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Whether it is what you are recommending or whether it is what you, Chair, are recommending, or the community is recommending through you, Chair; is it the intention that all stakeholders from the watershed will be represented? You can each answer. Council Chair Rapozo: Which one are you referencing? Councilmember Yukimura: C.3., your amendment...it is both your amendment (b) and (c), I am looking really at the community-based watershed councils that is being recommended for establishment and the County's recommendation existing in the plan right now, "Establish a watershed task force or a watershed liaison." So whose purpose is better communication and coordination of what, I am not sure. "Between agencies and organizations that work in the watershed mauka to makai. On page 99, in the text, right across C.3., it says that in 2003, "the Kaua`i Watershed Alliance was established to bring state, county, private landowners, and nonprofit partners together to protect the forested watershed through collaborative management practices." I believe they are still in existence, so I am just wanting to know how these two (2) groups, if there are going to be two (2) groups, are really going to work. I feel like we are called to recommend things that have been vetted and are going to have a good possibility of working. I do not believe that the General Plan is a list of possibilities. Committee Chair Chock: I might be able to shed a little light on that just based on what was told to me by the community with the Hanalei Watershed Hui. Councilmember Yukimura: Great. SPECIAL PLANNING 65 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: I think when you look at the plan, it is outlined in upper watershed versus the middle and makai and they function differently and there are different interests in each of those areas because of it. So you have different entities actually focusing on and I believe that the council that you are talking about focuses on the upper watershed management area exclusively and has not really coordinated well, as you had mentioned, with some of the other watershed activity and needs within the middle. There is need everywhere, as I see it. Is there a need for coordination, as I would see within the liaison—I would say yes that is what that is for. I just do not know if I agree it needs to be more clearly articulated, because there are existing councils and there is need for them to coordinate. Councilmember Yukimura: So it is kind of ironic that this plan separates the upper watershed from the middle watershed in the coastal plains because the watershed...the whole purpose of ahupua'a planning is that you plan for the whole watershed and that things that happen in the upper affect the middle and lower and the coast. That is one of the disconnects for me about why it is organized this way. Committee Chair Chock: Yes and no. Councilmember Yukimura: Are you going to do watershed councils for each area, for the upper, middle, and the lower? Committee Chair Chock: I am not. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, what are you supporting then? I am not clear what is being proposed. Is this watershed council going to be overseeing the whole watershed or just the upper watershed? Council Chair Rapozo: It just says that this establishment of community-based watershed councils will be assisting with watershed management issues. You can take it apart, split hairs, and do what you want, but it is a general concept that we want to restore the watershed council. That is basically what I am trying to say. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: But there are existing watershed councils? Committee Chair Chock: There are. Councilmember Kawakami: What we are trying to do is solve a communication and collaboration problem in a document, which is not going to happen. I understand what the problem is; it is the ability to work together. But then here we are throwing out amendments without any knowledge of unintended consequences, trying to force the hand of getting people to work together in a general plan. I think that is where the confusion is, Mr. Chair. I am confused as to how just writing language in is going to actually get the product that we are looking for, which SPECIAL PLANNING 66 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING is groups working together to solve a common problem. I am confused. So congratulations. Committee Chair Chock: Here is what I would like to do, I would like to take it from the Planning perspective because it is part of the General Plan and I think that at the very least, it can address how it is structured, because that is part of the confusion. I think the other piece that is the interest here in trying to coordinate and whether or not how we can support that in the true amendment is the question that you are asking. Is that fair? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: My thought is that it is not right for creation that there needs to be some work done in pulling everybody together and figuring out how to best set up a group that is going to help with management of the watershed. I think one thing government tends to do is create all of these separate groups and then they all start fighting each other, both for resources and hegemony and it does not really provide what we have in mind as the end, which is a well-coordinated system of management and communication. DLNR should be here, the Board of Water Supply should be here, and the citizens all...not here, but maybe they need to go and meet someplace, figure something out, and then come and propose it when it is all figured out. Committee Chair Chock: I would like to hear from Planning first. We can vote this out if that is what you want. We can take the vote now. Councilmember Yukimura: Maybe we should have some citizens speak, too. Committee Chair Chock: Public testimony is tomorrow. Mr. Dahilig: I guess the general concept is that we do support anything that would facilitate discussion and conflict resolution. But what we have concerns about is what they are being put together to do, and based on the way that paragraph 13 is structured, if looking I am looking at all four (4) paragraphs together, what the intent of these separate paragraphs strung together is meant to do is in our minds an issue with respect to the goal of restoring it to natural hydrology, that is all I can say, rather than getting into a wordsmith discussion. Committee Chair Chock: That is the bigger question. Mr. Dahilig: The big picture that we have an issue with is, one, what is the goal of this group that you are trying to put together or this communication that you are trying to facilitate? If the goal ultimately is to bring things back to natural hydrology, that is where we have an issue with our support in that. Committee Chair Chock: I guess my question is that it is in there already, so my question is what is it there for? SPECIAL PLANNING 67 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: What we have always been trying to get after is the phrase "facilitate better communication." We know that water is a conflict issue and interpreting what the amendment is trying to do is actually carry it from the upper watershed down to the middle watershed. That is what we believe that this was trying to do, is say, "Let us facilitate the discussion from the upper watershed to the middle watershed." It is similar to language that is already in the plan on page 99, paragraph C.3. with one difference that it is a singular entity versus a task force. That is where that rub comes in. Again, my apologies if I was reading this in a box when we got it, but my initial knee-jerk reaction to it was more from a resourcing standpoint, not necessarily a threading through standpoint. Now that I look at it carefully, it is meant to thread through. With that being said, if you are reading paragraph (a) with the rest of the discussion, that is where the main crux of our issue with it is. If the goal of all of this is to return everything to natural hydrology, I think that could have unintended consequences. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, so it is just (a) that you have an issue with is what I am hearing? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: What did you say? Your intention was a single entity rather than what? Mr. Dahilig: Paragraph (b) says, "Establish a watershed liaison,"whereas in page 99, which deals with the upper watershed, it says"task force or liaison." I think if you compare the two (2), the intent really is to try to have a czar or czar group that oversees the whole thing, not just in pieces of the watershed, but mauka to makai. I think that is where the consistency element and why I see now in paragraph (b) that was potentially the intent to go after that threading-through of that watershed task force or liaison it mentioned on page 99. Councilmember Yukimura: Mauna Kea pointed out to me that the Hawaiians did divide the upper, middle, and lower and you have the names of it, but the management was somehow overseen as an entity coordinating all of these different parts, right? I do not know how you can do it as separate entities. Mr. Dahilig: My knowledge on ancient Hawaiian water use management is very limited, so I would hesitate to confirm that statement. I know that in the kapu system, you had an ahupua`a ali`i that would help facilitate that and water kahuna that would take this, but I do not feel comfortable being able to answer that. Council Chair Rapozo: That is exactly why we need the liaison on the County's side that can work with and manage western-based science and ahupua`a. It is not expected to learn or know about the ancient Hawaiian cultural practices, but SPECIAL PLANNING 68 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING we should have someone that does. I think that is the whole purpose. Committee Chair, I understand Mike's concern with (a) as it relates to the natural hydrological function and the flow and the topography. If that is the hang up, I do not have a problem restoring the language to the original plan, but I think the others serve a valid purpose. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. He said that for (d), the public doctrine statement. Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, rephrase that paragraph like we did in the prior amendment. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: So then the vision is still for a watershed liaison and a community-based council, which oversees just the upper watershed? Council Chair Rapozo: Where are you reading? Councilmember Yukimura: (b) and (c). Council Chair Rapozo: (b) and (c) are the mid watershed area. Councilmember Yukimura: And that is what they are going to do, so you are going to have the Kaua`i Alliance... Council Chair Rapozo: What Kauai Alliance? Councilmember Yukimura: The Kaua`i Alliance that is mentioned... Council Chair Rapozo: That part is removed. One of the things...this is a 20-year plan, so I did not want to put entities' names in the General Plan that may not be around...not just for this section, but for all. It was a general conceptual paragraph. Councilmember Yukimura: It is not a conceptual thing, it is an action, right? Is it not listed as an action? Council Chair Rapozo: It is. Committee Chair Chock: We only have three (3) minutes left and we are going to recess this meeting. Chair, would you like to speak to#14 in this section? Council Chair Rapozo: #14 would be similar to #13, so I would assume that...I am not sure what the disagreement or nonsupport for#14 is, because it does not involve paragraph (a) with the natural hydrological. Mr. Dahilig: Yes, I think it is a mea culpa on my part. I was simply looking at the entity rather than the threading-through between#13 and SPECIAL PLANNING 69 DECEMBER 13, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING #14 that I should have looked back to the previous chapter to see how that was thread through. My analysis is not correct in that and I apologize. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Are we establishing...D.7. is for another area? It is a repeat, a duplicate, right? The watershed liaison? We are having it in two (2) parts of the plan? Mr. Dahilig: I think that is the concern is that we have these certain portions of the watershed, that this language, if it is going to be threaded-through, should be consistent amongst the different areas. Councilmember Yukimura: But you want to have a watershed council for the upper watershed, middle watershed, and the lower watershed? Is that the intent? Council Chair Rapozo: No, that is not the intent. Mr. Dahilig: Because we have this language on page 99 that is not part of the amendment, I think that is where we are getting into a consistency issue that I think we are probably at a little misunderstanding in our analysis here. Committee Chair Chock: Is it fair that maybe there is a little more work to be done for clarity? Mr. Dahilig: On this particular one, yes. Council Chair Rapozo: We can look at page 9 and maybe we will just address it prior to the breakdown of the different parts of the watershed. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. That about wraps up our time for today. Again, before we recess, I wanted to make sure everyone is aware that we will be taking public testimony first thing in the morning, right after our Special Council Meeting. I appreciate all of the work, we have gotten through half of the amendments thus far and things are going to keep coming up and percolating through, but we are working with them. I anticipate that we will get through it by tomorrow based on the momentum that we have had right now. I know we have some scheduling conflicts, so I just wanted to put that on the table. If there are no more questions or discussion at this time, we will recess this Special Planning Committee Meeting. There being no objections, the meeting recessed at 4:29 p.m. 12/14/2017 SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES ON BILL#2666 (GENERAL PLAN UPDATE) MINUTES Special Planning Committee Honorable Arthur Brun Honorable Ross Kagawa Honorable Arryl Kaneshiro Honorable Derek S.K. Kawakami Honorable Mel Rapozo Honorable JoAnn A. Yukimura Honorable Mason K. Chock The Committee reconvened on December 14, 2017 at 8:30 a.m., and proceeded as follows: Committee Chair Chock: I would like to reconvene the Special Planning Committee Meeting this morning. As promised, we will start with public testimony on the General Plan and these amendments that have been proposed. All of you who were here yesterday have gotten a copy of those. They are also online on our Council website if you folks choose to pull it up on the web. If you have not already signed up to testify, now is a good time to fill out one of those sheets. If not, do we have registered speakers? CODIE K. TABALBA, Council Services Assistant I: The first speaker is Eileen Kechloian, followed by Les Gale. ELAINE VALOIS: Elaine Valois. I am here to encourage you to reinstate the amendment to the General Plan. "Reinstate the amendment to the General Plan." I am not asking...please...in a way, we voted you in as our representatives to serve our basic wishes, not just our wishes, but the wisdom that the people have here on the island for the distant future. Somebody mentioned yesterday that the boat was not sinking and that it was sunk...yes...it may be...but I can tell you this—if you think you are having revenue problems now, take a look at some examples of what has been going on in California, besides the fact that it is burning. Orange County used to have two-lane highways and now it has eight-lane highways. This is what happens...you are not going to say, "Our problem is solved because we allowed an increase in highways or increase in huge development projects," which are not in keeping with the local ambiance of this island...smaller homes sprinkled here and there would be better than having a huge project. Who profits most by it? It is the developers, not us. Ten (10) years from now, how wide do you think our highways are going to be? How many do you think are going to be increased? How much more revenue are you going to need? It is a vicious cycle...it is a monster that needs feeding when the outside tells us how we should live here. Please...and I did not even want to use that word...it seems as if I am asking, but I am not, I am telling you. Reinstate the amendment to the General Plan for God's sake. SPECIAL PLANNING 2 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: I am trying to figure out what amendment you are talking about. Ms. Valois: I am talking about yesterday's one. Council Chair Rapozo: We had a bunch yesterday...we probably had a couple dozen. I am not sure which amendment you are referring to. Ms. Valois: How about all of them? Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. Thank you. Ms. Valois: They all need to be considered and I understand there is not enough about tourists. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. I am sorry, because I misheard the name...I think we have to call the first speaker, which was Eileen Kechloian. EILEEN KECHLOIAN: I will cut you some slack on that one. Committee Chair Chock: Sorry about that. Ms. Kechloian: No problem. Thank you very much for having me here and speaking this morning with all of us. My name is Eileen Kechloian. I stayed up late last night reading all of the amendments and I noticed one thing about them that was a pattern I saw, which was that Mike was objecting to almost all of Chair Rapozo's amendments. If you look through it, I think there is maybe two (2) or three (3) that he supported. Then I looked through Councilmember Kaneshiro's and with those, he was totally supportive of all amendments...they must be friends. Councilmember Yukimura's were supported, all except for I think one (1). Councilmember Yukimura: We have not taken that up yet. Ms. Kechloian: Right, these are the ones that are not all taken up yet. I became very confused about why it would be that one (1) person's would be so lopsided? Then I looked at it and wondered, "Well, is it a personality thing? Is there a conflict? Is it the matters that are at-hand with his?" The matters at-hand with his are the slowing of growth, moratoriums, and it is not that he is calling for any moratoriums, he is calling for the right to have a moratorium, which he legally has. If you put that in, you are not going to be messing with anybody. The future people will have the ability if they need to. The other thing that I noticed were the ones about water. Water in the Public Trust Doctrine go hand-in-hand. The Kauai Island Utility Cooperative (KIUC) just said that they are going to let some water go down the north fork. They were asked by the community; thirteen (13) people showed up and testified, asking them to please let some water go. The board also told them as part of their permit that they would have to let some of the water go. It is important to listen to the people. We need to recharge our aquifers. The only way is to let some of the water go to the farmers, kalo farmers, and people, and SPECIAL PLANNING 3 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING get it down to the Hawaiian Home Lands, because they were turned down for water and they should not have been. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. For the record, the amendments that Councilmember Kaneshiro's name is on are introduced by request and are actually my amendments. Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Or Planning's. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Actually, it was by request from the consultants and Planning, so I would hope that they would support all of them because it came directly from them. That are the ones that... Ms. Kechloian: He likes some other people, too. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Next speaker. Councilmember Kaneshiro: It came directly from them. Council Chair Rapozo: Committee Chair, real quick, in defense of the Planning Department, I think it is fair to let the public know that my amendments were not able to get across as early as the others were, so they did not have an opportunity to review the amendments with the time that the other amendments had. I am as frustrated as you, because I see some of these as being very simple. Anyway, I appreciate the opportunity. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Les Gale, followed by Greg Crowe. LES GALE: Mine is pretty much the same as Elaine. Committee Chair Chock: Can you please state your name for the record? Mr. Gale: My name is Les Gale. Like I said, mine is pretty much the same as Elaine's as far as reinstating the amendment to all of them...whatever went through yesterday. I am just kind of tired of the...I cannot even think of where I live...the "Kapa'a crawl" and obviously there is not going to be moneys to do anything about that. I worked in construction in Orange County for years and years and this seems to be going that way—I have only been here for twenty-five (25) years, so I have not been here very long, but to me, it seems to be going the same way that went as well, because I was there when it started; I left in the '80s. People do not come to see tracts of houses or traffic. I talk to the people in markets all of the time about visitors that come and they all really enjoy this place, except for the traffic. There is nothing I can say to them that is going to change anything like that. Anyway, thank you for your time and thank you for being here. SPECIAL PLANNING 4 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING I forgot that Councilmember Yukimura does not have to go through that crawl anymore because she moved. I did not know you moved. Councilmember Yukimura: I live in Lihu`e. Mr. Gale: I remember your old place. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Greg Crowe, followed by Bridget Hammerquist. GREG CROWE: Good morning, Council and everyone listening online. Thank you for taking the time to hear this. My name is Greg Crowe and I submitted an amendment earlier and fortunately Chair Rapozo was willing to introduce it for us. However, it was very rushed and did not have a lot of time to fully work it through with everyone that we would have liked to. So if there are some defects in it, we are certainly interested in trying to develop it to something that would work in the County. I will just summarize some of the brief points that we had in it instead of having to read through the whole thing, although you all have a copy and I hope you did have the time to do that. We tried to meet with those of you who were available, but of course, you all have busy schedules. We really appreciate the majority of you who did meet with us and talk about this beforehand. We originally had twenty-eight (28) points in our original draft, and due to the lack of time to go into detail with everybody, like Council, Planning, and legal, et cetera, we narrowed it down to five (5) key points, which I will just summarize now, which is the intent of what we are trying to get done, so that when you look at the amendment later, this will hopefully set some context for you. The first one is that the issue of affordable housing needs to be viewed more comprehensively in at least two (2) regards: the total housing-related cost must be included in the definition; and in solution for truly affordable housing, additional cost such as transportation, utilities, and maintenance must be in the calculation of affordability. Secondly on that point, affordable housing should not be thought of as only projects that can be funded with government support and are not really sustainable if you do not have huge amounts of other additional funding coming in from other places, which we are finding that everyone is pinched with the budget. There are models that are working elsewhere, where it does not require all government funding and subsidies. The second point is that the affordable housing objective must include a rapid elimination of the current affordable housing deficit and prevention of any more deficits occurring. Third, I think an affordable housing task force would be helpful with specific targets for numbers of new affordable units and timelines for both the short-term and long-term, which could be included in the actions and programs sections. Fourth, an affordable housing deficit should be treated as a disaster with emergency action until a deficit is corrected. Kaua`i's affordable housing deficit may have snuck up on us as a creeping disaster, but it is a disaster nonetheless and needs to be treated as such. If Kauai lost one thousand four hundred (1,400) homes in a tsunami, we certainly would treat it as a disaster; we are currently missing one thousand four hundred (1,400) homes that are affordable. People are being forced to move off-island due to lack of affordable housing and they usually never return. It is almost as if they had died from Kaua`i's SPECIAL PLANNING 5 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING housing disaster. We have lost them to our community and everything that they contribute to our families, our economy, and our culture. It hurts our families to lose loved ones and it hurts our economy when businesses cannot hire or retain enough employees. Finally, adaptive management should be included in the actions and programs. It is a powerful methodology that can dramatically help solve Kaua`i's affordable housing crisis and prevent a reoccurrence. My time is up, so I will end with saying thank you very much for the time and we hope that you all had a few minutes to review the amendment. We are certainly willing to work later with making it more acceptable if it does not pass as-is. Thank you very much for your time. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you, Greg. We have a question for you. Councilmember Brun: So the amendment that you are talking about is the amendment that we are going to be looking at next about the affordable housing? Mr. Crowe: I believe that is the one we submitted. Council Chair Rapozo: It is Amendment#6. Mr. Crowe: Yes, whatever number you have on it. Councilmember Brun: So this is the one that you folks worked on? Mr. Crowe: Yes. Councilmember Brun: Okay. Council Chair Rapozo: It is going to be withdrawn. We will bring it up next. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Bridget Hammerquist, followed by Ken Taylor. BRIDGET HAMMERQUIST: Good morning, my name is Bridget Hammerquist and I am here to thank you for having the public in and doing this process with the public. I think just for the record, one of the frustrations that has come through the process is the fact that many of us attended the meetings with the Planning Department and the public's input really was not well-received or well-responded to. It is the people's plan and I think that many of the amendments now suggest that public input is being considered and I just want to lend one more voice to support that process. Thank you all for the amendments, especially for the amendments that work on preservation of the environment, because that is what makes Kaua`i so special. Also, the preservation of our waterflow, watersheds, and the mauka to makai streamflow. It is really critical and there are a lot of people in the community that care about that and equally care about not growing so fast that SPECIAL PLANNING 6 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING we outstrip our infrastructure and the ability to deliver safe highway service, safe water service, and safe power. Thank you for your time, but if we could keep in mind that we cannot grow so fast that we do not have enough to take care of the people that are here and drive them off for that reason. That is an important consideration as well. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Ken Taylor, followed by Anne Walton. KEN TAYLOR: Chair and Members of the Council, Ken Taylor. Since this process started, I have given you three (3) papers. The first one asks you to consider doing a cost analysis on this project because I do not believe that the taxpayers can afford the cost of buildout of this plan. Second of all, I gave you a document talking about the traffic in the General Plan and I suggested that there should be no new development projects over ten (10) units approved until we have solved the long-range traffic congestion problems. I know in looking at the amendments, there are a lot of reasons why a moratorium may not be able to be put in place, but under that circumstance, the General Plan going forward should not allow for changing zoning on large parcels until we can resolve the traffic congestion. Third, I gave you a document and commented on sustainability, sprawl, and climate change and asked you to remove all discussion on sustainability, because I do not believe that the plan is sustainable. The first law of sustainability, population growth and growth in the rate of consumption of resources, cannot be sustained. None of these things have been discussed in this process, and as I say, the first time I passed this out to you was at the meeting down at the Convention Hall. So I am looking forward to hearing some comments back from you on these issues. The time may be coming when Kaua`i may have to relocate because its current location has become too expensive: wages, rent, housing costs, land costs, construction costs, materials costs, regulatory issues, and capital constraints to name a few. We have gotten it all wrong by providing free housing for cars and very expensive housing for people. Please, before approving this plan, do a cost analysis. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Anne Walton, followed by Kathy Valier. ANNE WALTON: Good morning. For the record, my name is Anne Walton. First of all, I want to thank you all for your dedication and commitment to really hearing your way through this plan. I want to thank Councilmember Chock for being so courageous in forging forward with a process like this. I know it has been hard and tedious, but we all appreciate it and feel for the first time on the community side that we are actually being heard. Thank you, Chair Rapozo, for supporting that process. I have reviewed in detail a packet provided to the public on December 13th and I find that I am in agreement with almost all of the amendments, with a few exceptions as indicated below. I am not going to read all of mine because I do not have enough time, but I am going to emphasize a few of them. I agree with the SPECIAL PLANNING 7 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING following proposed amendment, which the Planning Committee voted down, to remove all reference to provisional agriculture and provisional resort and return the designated areas to agriculture. Even though this is not my kuleana, I believe that the attempt to start to nuance different zoning categories is a slippery slope, leaving us with neither a clear zoning plan, nor a commitment from the landowners or County on the immediate or future intention of the use of that land. Secondly, on the temporary moratoria that Councilmember Rapozo proposed in his amendment, the General Plan exquisitely depicts some of the enormous challenges Kaua`i is facing with regards to a fragile and taxed infrastructure, an uncertain understanding of freshwater availability and access, traffic congestion, eroding quality of life factors, and loss of rural lifestyle and landscape residents have enjoyed in the past. It is important to establish that they are legally supported and sound management approach is available to the County Council for slowing down the rapid pace of development and taking the time to address some of these issues by establishing the legal framework and the terms and conditions under which a moratorium authority could be exercised. The General Plan is also introducing a possible future approach for managing the current rapid growth on Kauai that is outpacing the goods and services necessary to actually support it. I would support a change in the wording found throughout this amendment on the moratorium needs that reads: 1) "If supported by adequate environmental impact data," 2) "If supported by extraordinary environmental impact data." I do not know what this means and I do not know what the distinction between the two is. They would have to be defined. If that is the Planning Department's only problem with it, then I certainly would be willing to support that change for a moratorium. This came up yesterday in the discussion with Mike. I also want to thank Mauna Kea because I think he was very brilliant in his approach to crafting the language on this. The other area that I want to mention that is not in the amendments and is not adequately satisfied by the amendments, is the area of implementation and monitoring. There is a new list in there on page 8 of 16 of Councilmember Kaneshiro's proposed amendments. Committee Chair Chock: I am sorry, but your time is up. Ms. Walton: Okay. Well, this needs to be addressed. The plan is no good without an implementation and monitoring piece and it is woefully inadequate and sloppily put together. I urge you to go back and revisit that piece. It is not proposed well in the amendments. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Kathy Valier, followed by Felicia Cowden. KATHY VALIER: Good morning. Kathy Valier. I am sorry I was not here yesterday because I had to work, but it worked out well that I could be here before you when you resumed your discussion about watershed. A few weeks ago, when I was going to come in and testify about watershed is when we had the flood and I could not get here. I printed out seven (7) copies of the first page of my testimony, because as Councilmember Kaneshiro was saying, you folks had trees worth of paper in front of you, so I am sure it is lost under that. I left it at home when SPECIAL PLANNING 8 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING I fed the chickens this morning in the dark, so it is sitting outside of their coop. I think I can capture the gist of it without referring to specific numbers. In regards to the watershed councils, I was watching yesterday and I know you were concerned. I know the Watershed Alliance folks had to same amendment request and what we were trying to be able to have two (2) concepts instead of three (3). There was the watershed liaison, the watershed councils, and then there was a task force that was mentioned. We were trying to whittle it down to watershed councils and liaison. So those were the two (2), but they needed to be in each part of the watershed and because it was broken up, that is why the wording was repeated over and over again, is because we were trying to have it...as Mike figured out, we were trying to thread it through the whole watershed. So that was the intention of that. I did some research about watershed councils; Don Heacock pointed me to the direction of Oregon, which has separate councils for each watershed and they have a lottery that funds it, which we do not. Still, I think the concept is a valid one and I know that there are the Aha Moku Councils that were formed, and one of the comments that someone made to me is maybe perhaps one of the reasons those have not been more functional and more productive is that it is a bigger area, so it might be more productive if individual watersheds had their own hui or groups that could work and do projects to help their watersheds. The Natural Resource Conservation Service, which is under the Department of Agriculture, does similar programs. They have one on Maui called "Auwahi," which is a wonderful partnership between Ulupalakua Ranch and Division of Forestry. If any of you want to look it up online, there is a great video Art Medeiros did about how they are reforesting there. It is a community project. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you, Kathy. Your testimony clears up some things and we had some post-meeting discussions, too. Do you have any objections to involving the Kauai Watershed Alliance, which is mainly right now a group of landowners, but does have as part of its vision also having nonprofit agencies and citizen groups, such as those in the more grassroots councils, do their work together? Ms. Valier: I asked Allan Rietow, who was here the day the watershed was discussed, to come this morning, because they are key players in the Kauai Watershed Alliance. I know Councilmember Kaneshiro attends the meetings as well, so he might be able to clarify that better, but my understanding... Councilmember Yukimura: No, I am not asking how the alliance is presently configured, I am asking what our goal is in terms of having a body that oversees and impacts the watershed management. Ms. Valier: Yes, I guess where I was going with that was just that I think from my experience, working up mauka volunteering with what they are doing up there, is such a different context that I do not see as applying to the middle and lower watersheds so much. I think we would do better to have individual councils as people like Waipa or Hanalei Watershed Hui and those sorts of smaller scale... SPECIAL PLANNING 9 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Well, in Waipa's case, they have a really good working relationship with the owner of the land, Kamehameha Schools. So there is that connection and coordination. I am concerned about setting up formals structures that are bubbles, where people are not talking to each other who affect each other. Ms. Valier: Right, that is why the liaison seemed important. Councilmember Yukimura: But why not everyone around the table? Committee Chair Chock: Okay. I do not want to get into a long discussion. If you have a specific question... Councilmember Yukimura: Well, we are crafting form and function in the terms of what you were describing as follow-up actions, and if you are calling for the creation of a watershed council, it is important to know what the purpose of the council will be and whether all stakeholders will be represented or whether you are going to have separation, which is why we cannot get anything done because everybody is in their own bubble and they do not have that... Committee Chair Chock: I am happy to have that discussion, Councilmember Yukimura, but I do not want it to interfere with public testimony. If we need to bring in and understand it more, then we will do so in making a decision, but not during public testimony. Councilmember Yukimura: I would love to have that. Committee Chair Chock: I have a lot to say about it as well, so let us move on. Councilmember Yukimura: So as long as there is assurance that we will have that time to discuss, because even when... Committee Chair Chock: As it relates to the amendment or not, we will get towards making a decision. If there is more to be done, then as a body, we can make that decision when we get back to the discussion. Councilmember Yukimura: I am just asking that when we are doing the amendments, whether we will have time to actually have discussions, because I have sensed an expedient factor that does not want to have a discussion when we are dealing with amendments. Committee Chair Chock: I think it is a lack of clarity of what it is you are trying to achieve, first of all, but let us have the discussion. I said we will and we will. Councilmember Yukimura: I am trying to achieve a good amendment. SPECIAL PLANNING 10 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: I understand. So am I. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Felicia Cowden, followed by Sandra Herndon. FELICIA COWDEN: Aloha. Felicia Cowden, for the record. I am going to go quick. I have three (3) amendment packets that I would like you to pull out, both by Councilmember Kaneshiro, and then the one from Chair Rapozo that starts with the moratorium. So with Councilmember Kaneshiro's one that is here for the Planning Department, Mike Dahilig, I basically am pretty fine with all of it. I just want to put that in context of looking at Chair Rapozo's. When Mike Dahilig, the Planning Director, was talking, I heard him say a few things that I felt I understood. If we turn to page 2 of Chair Rapozo's, the second full paragraph, last sentence, it says, "Nonetheless, when used appropriately, they can be an important tool." I think if important is changed with "a valuable," because I heard him to be saying that felt a little strong, I agree. A moratorium can be disastrous if it is used recklessly. I saw that Anne Walton put the same thing that I did with these other elements in the watershed piece where there is the word "adequate" that is used in these paragraphs on page 4 through 8. If the word "extraordinary" is out in there. So it means if there are extraordinary circumstances of when maybe this gets kicked in instead of it being regular. On page 10, in this "restore waterflow to streams," perhaps if the word "consistent," "baseline," or fifty percent (50%) waterflow" is there, because I also understood where the Planning Department was choking a little bit on if we totally restored the waterflow completely, that could also be really intense for people who have depended on that water for a long time, but what we want is consistent waterflow. In looking at that, I just want to say that when there was no support necessarily written for some of what was on Chair Rapozo's pieces, I heard the Planning Director say that he did not understand the ancient Hawaiian system of ahupua`a management. But it is not ancient. I appreciated that he acknowledged that. It is a contemporary piece. If we look at Western and ahupua`a, which is what Chair said, that is important, because that is the jugular of the cultural perpetuation part. Western values commerce and the ahupua'a system values a resilient environment of abundance and I think both are important, so I really want to thank that movement looking there. I could speak twice as long, but you got my ideas. I like most of what is your second one, too...Councilmember Kaneshiro's. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Sandra Herndon, followed by Tommy Passerella. SANDRA HERNDON: Good morning. My name is Sandra Herndon. I have been following this process for a while. I am very, very grateful for it. I have not been able to attend a lot of the meetings because I have had to take a job and the reason I had to take a job was because rents are going up. I would like to address the SPECIAL PLANNING 11 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING idea of changing the provisional agriculture category. We need housing, obviously...we need affordable housing...housing that addresses the needs of the community that is here now. In order to do that, we also need an infrastructure that supports development. So when it comes to jobs, I get that. There are a lot of people in the construction industry that are here to say we need jobs, which we do. We need to have jobs in infrastructure, so it is not just about building houses; it is about building the infrastructure and what is the basis for those houses. It seems like we are at a point now where we really need to look at changing not just the way we have always done things, but our whole concept about how to support the community at its highest level. I know you all know the old definition of"insanity"—doing the same thing and expecting different results. Well, I suspect that if we were to change that provisional agriculture designation and allow places like Hokua Place to go through, for the sake of providing jobs, it is going to result in the same kind of insanity,because you will have houses, people, but will not have a basis to support them and their quality of life, just like the rest of us, is not going to be wonderful. I ask you to consider not changing that provisional agriculture category or designation. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Tommy Passerella, followed the Jim Edmonds. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I ask a question? Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Sandra, there is a clarifying question for you. Councilmember Yukimura: I am not able to make the connection between provisional agriculture and Hokua Place. Ms. Herndon: Well, my understanding is that they want to change the designation up there so that they can go ahead and put housing up there at some point and it looks like it is going to be sooner as opposed to later. If that land remains in agriculture, then I think we will have more room to grow food, more room for different kinds of products and businesses. Committee Chair Chock: We understand your position on it. I think what she is confused about is use of provisional agriculture as it relates to that area. Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, so you are just saying that...because right now, Hokua Place is designated for residential. Ms. Herndon: Right. Councilmember Yukimura: And you are saying to change it to provisional agriculture? SPECIAL PLANNING 12 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Ms. Herndon: No, I am saying do not make those changes to provisional agriculture because that prevents further development. I am not in favor of Hokua Place going up, but I am also not in favor of changing agricultural land designations so that it can be more available to development later on. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Ms. Herndon: That is my point. Committee Chair Chock: One more clarifying question. Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: So about agricultural land, so right now, you do not think we have enough agricultural land as it is? We have way too much farmers and not enough land? Ms. Herndon: No, of course not. We do not have nearly enough farmers. We have plenty of land. Councilmember Brun: Yes. Ms. Herndon: But we do not have it in farms...we do not have it in agriculture. It is not being fully utilized for the purpose that the island needs it. Councilmember Brun: I understand, but because of that point, we just do not have enough farmers...we have a lot of land. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Tommy Passerella, followed by Jim Edmonds. Committee Chair Chock: Tommy Passerella? Not here. Ms. Tabalba: Jim Edmonds. JIM EDMONDS: Good morning. I am Jim Edmonds. I am actually speaking as an individual, I am not representing anyone. As you know, Greg Crowe and I had put together an amendment and we are pulling that amendment temporarily to do some work on it, to try to make it more palatable for everyone. That does not mean that we do not believe in the amendment, we are fanatic about it and think it is urgent. It is just that right now, we do not feel like we have the support to make it happen, so we are going to try to improve it. We ask for everyone to give us your suggestions as to how to make it work better for everyone. Our goal is to build truly affordable housing, not five hundred thousand dollar ($500,000) houses, but houses that people can afford to live in. I pretty much put my life on hold to do that at this stage of the game. I am going to make a couple of comments about a subject that probably will not make me very popular with a lot of people who testify here, but SPECIAL PLANNING 13 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING in terms of Hokua Place, I had a Councilmember ask me recently what I thought about it and basically I said that it is a very tough decision, but I think we have to do it. As far as the traffic issue, I know enough about what is going to happen with traffic in next ten (10) years and I am happy to have an independent discussion with anyone that I do not think traffic is going to be nearly as much of an issue as everyone thinks it is. So those people who freak out about traffic might want to go live on O`ahu for a couple of weeks and find out what traffic really is. When it comes to the agriculture land, I know that this is a major concern and I know we need to hang onto our agricultural land. Hokua Place would take ninety-seven (97) acres out of agricultural zoning and turn it into hundreds of affordable houses, and sixty-six (66) acres up there will stay in agriculture. I have a list of who owns the land on Kaua`i if you really want to start preserving agriculture, you may want to look at the one hundred thirty-six thousand (136,000) acres that are owned by the State of Hawaii, the fifty-one thousand (51,000) acres owned by the Robinson family, thirty-six thousand (36,000) by Grove Farm, twenty thousand (20,000) by Alexander & Baldwin, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) has twenty thousand (20,000), and Kamehameha Schools, et cetera. I can give that copy of that list to anyone who wants it. All I have to say is thank you so much and maybe you folks will be able to get some sleep now. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: No question, I just would like that list. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you, Jim, for all the work you have been doing on this. You said your goal is to build truly affordable housing, so how are you defining truly affordable? Mr. Edmonds: It is really tough to define anything when you start talking about affordable housing because it is such a moving target. I think we would like to bring houses on the market in the lower three hundred thousand dollar ($300,000) range if we could, and of course, that would be some rentals also involved in that. I am working on quite a few projects and they are all different and changing as we speak. Councilmember Yukimura: I think your definition is reasonable in terms of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) for purchase, and then you have to talk about what is a reasonable rental price. I urge you that as your develop more thinking on this to look at the County Housing guidelines, which tie affordability to income. Mr. Edmonds: Absolutely. We were studying those and working with Kanani. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you very much. SPECIAL PLANNING 14 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Even though it sounds like it will get withdrawn, we will have a discussion on the housing thing. Mr. Edmonds: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Jean Souza, followed by Bobby Farias. JEAN SOUZA: Good morning. Jean Souza of Hanapepe, representing the Hanapepe--`Ele`ele Community Association. We submitted or floated three (3) amendments, two (2) of which are in your packets. We appreciate your continued support to relocate the boundary between Hanapepe--`Ele`ele Planning District and the South Kauai Planning District to the western bank of Kalaheo Gulch, excluding Brydeswood and Brydeswood Ranch. I would like to address the provisional agriculture. I would like you to consider separating out the provisional agriculture element from the provisional resort element, because I believe that they have different constituencies and different project histories and they mean different things to different communities. For Hanapepe-`Ele`ele, I have to say that the provisional agriculture sections, both at Numila and between Lima Ola and Wahiawa Gulch, represent significant increased acreage for urban development. They, along with Lima Ola and along with the neighborhood general proposal, makai of Halewili Road between Port Allen and Wahiawa Gulch represent a significant increase in potential urban land for Hanapepe-`Ele`ele to the extent that it includes possibly an equivalent acreage, like Kukui`ula, plus the doubling of the residential area for Hanapepe-`Ele`ele. I submit to you that this represents a transformational degree of change, not an incremental degree of change as expressed in the Hanapepe-`Ele`ele section of the plan. If I could take off my hat and just speak for a moment about myself, representing myself—related to the moratorium, I do not generally support moratoriums; however, I do share the sentiments that led to the proposal. As one of the key decision-makers here on Kauai, I want to address you and others in the County that we need to step up and do a better job of addressing project impacts, including offsite and cumulative impacts so that adequate mitigation measures can be developed as conditions of approval. There is a disconnect. I think also that people need to stop thinking in terms of silos. When you talk about affordable housing, just looking at certain measures to fix a problem, I think we need to do a better job of anticipating problems and taking measures, and it could be bold measures, to avoid the problems. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Do you know what population increase can be projected from the land development that is proposed for provisional agriculture, which is actually provisional urban and neighborhood general plus Lima Ola? Ms. Souza: I know about Lima Ola, but I believe that there is very little information about the provisional agriculture development and the SPECIAL PLANNING 15 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING neighborhood general development. I can only read some of the testimony that has been submitted to get a general idea. The problem about these kinds of amendments that come through this General Plan process is that it is not fully developed. Councilmember Yukimura: You mean fully vetted? Ms. Souza: Well, fully developed or fully disclosed. For example, at any point, a landowner can propose a General Plan amendment. It does not have to only occur during this update stage. When they do that, it is pretty thorough disclosure of what the project is and what the impacts are. During this amendment process, we have to search really hard for what we think is being proposed. So there is not as much for the community to understand. I was looking at it in terms of the geographic extent of the lands that is affected and how that compares with the geographic extent of Hanapepe-`Ele`ele and the geographic extent of Kukui`ula as an example of the magnitude of development. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: As you were talking on behalf of Hanapepe- `Ele`ele, so you folks are okay with building more houses in the Hanapepe--`Ele`ele district? Did I hear that correct? Ms. Souza: Yes, we are not against development, but can I explain a little bit more? Councilmember Brun: Yes. Ms. Souza: I think that many of us would like to see more effort done to improve to existing town centers of Hanapepe Town and the `Ele`ele commercial area. We support other projects. I was not opposed to Lima Ola per se, I just wanted better disclosure of what the impacts are, both direct and indirect and cumulative, downstream impacts. I think not enough emphasis is given to the whole impact of a project. I just wanted that disclosed to the land use decision-makers. Did you have something in mind? Councilmember Brun: We had that big thing with Lima Ola and you folks were totally against it, and then now we are talking about building in the Hanapepe and `Ele`ele area. Ms. Souza: No, let me clarify. I took the extreme position of becoming an intervener at the Land Use Commission so that I could have access to all of the documents and the information and have an equal stake at the table with the other parties. We were supportive, but we wanted to make sure that adequate conditions were imposed on the project. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. What I want to do is keep our testimony to clarifying questions and I understand that there is more. I do not want to extend it further. We will be discussing these items as we move through the amendments and if there is a need for us to engage with Members, then we will do SPECIAL PLANNING 16 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING that then. I do not want to make it unfair for those that I am cutting off at three (3) minutes when we are extending the conversation. Thank you. Ms. Souza: Thank you. Councilmember Brun: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The last registered speaker is Bobby Farias. BOBBY FARIAS: Good morning, Council. For the record, Bobby Farias. I am a large-scale rancher and proud of it. I am here this morning to speak on behalf...I have a couple of notes here...the word "moratorium" is a scary word when you talk about blanket decisions on large parcels. I would just like to say that the current landowner does a good job of managing and preserving the area, and inserting language into the General Plan, giving special interest groups for specific agendas, gets dangerous. Again, I think the current landowner does a good job over the long term or lots of area, supports agriculture farm-wide. This comes down to a risk reward, I think, a lot of times. I am willing to take some risks for the potential opportunity of some rewards. That is where we are...a little more traffic, a little more congestion, for a lot more opportunity. The ranching industry has been really tough. I do not think we have enough largescale agriculture, and agriculture needs to be largescale because it is a very, very low margin business; you break even at best. Again, food security and open space management...I think we all like that, but it is farmers and ranchers that do that, and sometimes for no pay. That is just what we signed up for. But moratoriums gets scary and I think the current landowner does a good job managing those open spaces. That is all I have to say today. Council Chair Rapozo: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Chair Rapozo. Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you, Bobby. I guess I am hearing your testimony like this moratorium is targeted for one (1) landowner. Did you read the amendment at all? Mr. Farias: No, just the word "moratorium" is spooky. I did not have a lot of time to prep for this. Council Chair Rapozo: Oh, okay. Mr. Farias: But like I said, anytime there is a blanket ruling for something, it gets scary and I think...again, the word "moratorium" is spooky and I am here on behalf of that specific term. Again, inserting words for the vehicle, or avenue, if you would, for a special interest group, I think is dangerous, personally. SPECIAL PLANNING 17 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: I guess I would ask that you read the amendment because the amendment is a broad...it does not give the Council any authority that it does not already have. It actually points out the pros and the cons. It actually talks about the dangers of a moratorium. I am not sure what you were told, but I would ask that you read the amendment and if you have specific concerns about the parts of the amendment, I would be more than happy to look at that. In general...I am hoping that the message did not go out yesterday that this was intended for a specific landowner, because it is not. This is a general...basically to clarify...clear up...during the discussion that we had leading up to this point, there was a lot of community members that demanded a moratorium, "You folks should do a moratorium." Yet, there are very strict parameters for any government to do a moratorium. I wanted to try to clarify in the General Plan so that there is no misunderstanding that the Council cannot just do a moratorium. If you read it, I think you will see where it talks about the pros and the cons, that in fact, it really can disrupt the business, farming, and homes being built. That is all explained very clearly in the amendment. Committee Chair Chock: We will have a conversation today on it. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Bobby, thank you so much for being here. Mr. Farias: You bet. Councilmember Yukimura: Congratulations on the wonderful development of your business. Mr. Farias: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: I just wanted to clarify which landowner are you speaking about? Mr. Farias: The landowner I am speaking about is Grove Farm specifically. But pieces far and wide though, right? Back to Mel's question if I read it and understood it—Kaua`i, specifically seems to be in sort of a pattern, right? If there is a bad problem in a specific industry, it starts to catch its own wildfire into the rest of that industry and you become guilty by association on either the broader issue at-hand and/or it rifles down, right? We are on over four thousand (4,000) acres and we manage over two thousand (2,000) animals and we start to fall under this largescale agriculture project. The roles start to smear and we start to get put into boxes with other larger companies and I just do not want this snowball, slippery slope effect to happen when words like "moratorium" come up. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: I have one more question. Committee Chair Chock: Vice Chair, do you have one, too? SPECIAL PLANNING 18 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, I just want to thank you for coming up and speaking. Whatever you said, I totally agree and I appreciate what you said. If it has some negative connotation or impact, why even mention it? I agree. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Bobby, you said that you believe in taking calculated risks, not wild and crazy risks, and that if taking the risk or risk a little bit more traffic, a little bit more congestion, that it might be worth it. What if you could have the risk but there is a system where you do not have to generate extra traffic? Mr. Farias: No "cake and eat it, too." That is utopia, but that is not realistic. I could be wrong, I am not a planner. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, communities do it everywhere. Committee Chair Chock: Let us discuss that utopia now. Any more clarifying questions? I would like to move on. Thank you so much, Bobby, for coming up. I appreciate it. Mr. Farias: Thank you folks for your time. Ms. Tabalba: Committee Chair, there are a few more speakers. The next speaker is Susan Remoaldo, followed by Elsie Godbey. SUSAN REMOALDO: Good morning. My name is Susan Remoaldo and I am a resident of`Ele`ele and I speak for myself today. I agree with the proposed changes and concerns regarding the Kaua`i General Plan Update, as Jean Souza has described and explained. I want to reiterate: number one, the adjustment to the Planning District boundary to include Numila will accurately represent how residents, to this day, identify our community. Number two, she touched on a neighborhood general designation in one area, but another concern is that the existing residential areas in lower `Ele`ele, between the elementary school and the highway, should be designated residential community and not neighborhood general. Neighborhood general allows mixed-uses, including commercial activities which will supplant existing residences and will inevitably change the character of the neighborhood. Commercial activities belong in neighborhood centers where vacant and undeveloped property already exists. Number three, the new provisional agriculture designation is a vaguely described, untested and yet to be interpreted designation, giving pause to the intentions of such a designation. Remove this designation from the Hanapepe-`Ele`ele land use maps and keep these lands simply as agriculture. There will be no confusion or misunderstanding as to its use and let the upcoming community plan process independently propose a future planning scape for these areas. Thank you for your consideration. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The last speaker is Elsie Godbey. SPECIAL PLANNING 19 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING ELSIE GODBEY: My name is Elsie Godbey. I was a resident of and born in Hanapepe. The 1940 master plan of the town of Hanapepe was one of the first planning efforts in the territory and had an effect on the subsequent zoning that was adopted for Hanapepe Town. The zoning map closely follows the master plan recommendations. This is taken from the Hanapepe town core economic revitalization program by Spencer Mason Architects. The zoning map closely follows the master plan recommendation, rather than the actual uses of the lots. Many lots used for residencies are zoned commercial use. To this day, a lot of the residential buildings are on commercially-zoned lots. So is the General Plan not general? If something like this happens, can you not discuss this? Anyway, it still exists in Hanapepe Town where commercially-zoned lots have many residential buildings. Another thing, at yesterday's meeting, I thought I heard that on the watersheds, Hanapepe River and some other rivers were watersheds, but I do not think they mentioned Hanapepe River. Anyway, in the same project, Spencer Mason says that the research they made in November 1995 says, "The Hanapepe River is a partially navigable stream and it is an exceptional natural resource. The river beginning at two (2) waterfalls at the head of the valley then lines through a narrow canyon that opens as it reaches the lower valley. The Hanapepe River and the rising valley walls firm the backdrop for the town, which is bounded..." Committee Chair Chock: I am sorry, but you ran out of time. If you want to, we can make copies of your testimony. Ms. Godbey: I just want to know if the river is included in watershed and I was just reading a description of the valley and how important it is. It is a watershed, so why was it not listed? Committee Chair Chock: Understood. I do not think it was mentioned in the specific amendment; however, I think it is in the General Plan stated elsewhere. Ms. Godbey: Okay. Ms. Tabalba: Committee Chair, you have more speakers. The next speaker is Debbie Lee-Jackson, followed by Hope Kallai. DEBBIE LEE-JACKSON: Aloha Chair and Members. My name is Debbie Lee-Jackson. I am a kuleana landowner and a taro farmer. I am here to talk about the General Plan Update and that it assumes that the State ensures mauka to makai streamflow, but there is none. There is no mauka to makai streamflow in our major rivers, except for Na Pali. We work the sugar water diversion leases that were supposed to end when the plantations shut down. Just as the State, you, the County, are trustees and I am a beneficiary. I, as a Native Hawaiian, and I, as a member of the general public, am a beneficiary of the public trust and my rights are being violated. My traditional and customary rights are being violated, because moving water out of the ahupua`a destroys my ability to farm and grow lo`i kalo. All beneficiaries are violated as rivers and streams are dewatered and environmental protection is dewatered; environmental protection is violated. The General Plan SPECIAL PLANNING 20 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Update must address the balance of water that it is consistent with Hawaiian traditional and customary practices and public trust purposes. We cannot have dry streams, it violates my rights. I have pictures of dry streambeds where the water is being diverted. You have dry, sunbaked rocks. Thank you. Councilmember Kagawa: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: Debbie, we grew up in the Hanapepe River and Waimea River and we have the same concerns, but you understand that if we have no jurisdiction over those matters that basically we are the wrong entity to prove your case. If we have conflicting legislation at the County-level that conflicts with the State, then we have "Bill No. 2491" all over again and we just create more lawsuits and more unnecessary battles that really ends up not helping the people, and instead ends up hurting the people. I hope you understand that, yes, we have to work together with the State, but the County cannot have our own laws when we have no jurisdiction and expertise. Ms. Lee-Jackson: I understand, but the County assumes that the State is doing the right thing. Why can the County not fight for our water rights, too? Councilmember Kagawa: Because we have no jurisdiction over the waterflow. It is the State, CWRM. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Kagawa: That is the problem that we have. Ms. Lee-Jackson: Okay. I will E-mail you. Councilmember Kagawa: Basically, we are barking up the wrong tree on water rights. Ms. Tabalba: Hope Kallai, followed by Tom Shigemoto. HOPE KALLAI: Hope Kallai. I am testifying for myself also about water and I want to go to the disconnect with the State. In the General Plan, it assumes we have a lot of perennial rivers, but our perennial rivers are not perennial if they go dry. The north fork Wailua goes dry for about a mile-and-a-half. It is not perennial if it is dry. So the County not addressing what the State is allowing is impacting our resources incredibly. I know you folks have read tons, so I just wanted to show pictures. This is below the dam on the north fork of Wailua. It is bone-dry for about a mile or a mile-and-a-half, depending on our weather precipitation. This is a unique land form...this is Wai`ale`ale and this is what we do with our forests. You have a concrete dam in the middle of the live channel of the stream that dries up one hundred percent (100%) of the base flow during most normal weather patterns. If you can see this big map, all of the light blue lines are not streams and rivers, those SPECIAL PLANNING 21 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING are ditches and they come from our upper watersheds, tapping our water resources, and destroying the hydrologic continuity of our perennial streams. This is being allowed by the State. If the County does not mention it, it is going to go on. We just went to the BLNR meeting and they did not know that our river was being dried up one hundred percent (100%). They did not know that there were endangered species snails in that habitat. This is what remains of the north form of Wailua stream. It is captured in a ditch and exported for one percent (1%) of our hydropower. What has me really concerned is this is what the ditch looks like now. It has this little bridge that goes across and I did not really know what it was until I found this random tourist picture online from the year 2000. Those were gate valves. This over here is the throw-out. This is the gate valve to restrict the waterflow that is now free-flowing one hundred percent (100%) to the hydropower plants. This was never free-flow. This gate valve was in place, because during the Lihu`e Plantation era, they did not need one hundred percent (100%) diversion. The real consideration I have is the price that we are going to pay for our surface water from Grove Farm for the surface water treatment plant, because this is what is going to enable our development in the future. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you, Hope. Ms. Kallai: I am sorry, I did not see the light. Committee Chair Chock: That is a good tactic, put it in front of your face and you cannot see the light. Ms. Kallai: Really, honestly, I did not know. Committee Chair Chock: I am kidding. Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The last speaker is Tom Shigemoto. TOM SHIGEMOTO: Good morning. For the record, my name is Tom Shigemoto. I really did not expect to say anything this morning, but after hearing some of the testimony, I am here to discuss and talk about the moratorium language that is proposed or is being proposed. As Bobby Farias mentioned, it is a "spooky" word for us developers. I think moratoriums generally intend to pertain to real estate development, but I would just like to caution the Council. I have been involved in General Plan Updates, going back to forty (40) years, and every single General Plan Update talks about economic development as a key policy item or a key goal. What you have to consider or be careful about is when you adopt language like this in this guiding principle for the island is how it impacts outside development. It is not only real estate; it is tourism, housing, agriculture, and from outside investors coming in when they see this kind of moratorium language, in again, your guiding principle. That is why I just wanted to testify to say that be careful what you wish for. Look at maybe the unintended consequences of adopting this kind of language and decide appropriately. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. SPECIAL PLANNING 22 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: I have a clarifying question. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Tom, thank you for your testimony. We have been talking about provisional agriculture categories in `Ele`ele-Hanapepe, which is on A&B's land. Can you tell us what are planned for...first of all, did A&B request that those areas be designated for urban growth... Mr. Shigemoto: I am talking about moratoriums, Councilmember Yukimura. If you want to go into land use policies and things then I would be willing to spend ten (10) or fifteen (15) minutes here. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Mr. Shigemoto: I am only here for the moratorium. I disagree with the testimony that has been received and I can answer your question, but I do not think this is the place for it. Committee Chair Chock: The whole concept of provisional versus resort is something that I keep hearing coming up as it relates to what was already introduced. I would love to see it in a formal amendment so that we can discuss it thoroughly and even bring the people who can speak to it back for further clarification. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, it is hard for me to develop an amendment without knowing what is being proposed. I would like to ask Mr. Shigemoto to come back and tell us what is being proposed. Jean Souza said is usually when it is a separate amendment by an applicant, they lay out what they are proposing so that we can assess what the impacts will be. I think it is only fair that we know that. Committee Chair Chock: I would agree. Let me just say that I think that everyone at this table has worked on amendments that they have spent some time trying to get some of those answers so that we can have the discussion. I do not see an amendment right now that is regarding this and I would like to see it in order for us to be on the same page and have that discussion. Councilmember Yukimura: The amendment is... Committee Chair Chock: We voted on the amendment yesterday. Councilmember Yukimura: But you said that we can bring it back. Committee Chair Chock: I am happy for you to do so if that is what your intention is, but not as it relates to public testimony on this item. Councilmember Yukimura: That is correct. SPECIAL PLANNING 23 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Which his testimony is not even about that. Councilmember Yukimura: I am not pursuing my questioning here, but I am asking, Chair, to have Mr. Shigemoto come back because the amendment proposed by the Chair to remove provisional agriculture needs the information from the landowner. Committee Chair Chock: I would agree with that. Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. Council Chair Rapozo: Real quick, that amendment was voted on already, it is done. If you want to have that discussion, someone is going to have to introduce an amendment. It is done. That was the whole purpose of the thing to vote on it, get it out of the way, and move on. If you want to have that discussion... Mr. Shigemoto: I have a question. Council Chair Rapozo: I am just saying that to even have that discussion on that item, it needs to be introduced. Committee Chair Chock: You need an amendment. I agree and that is what I meant, Chair. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, I thought there was an openness to opening it up if based on testimony today, which we got, we would be able to reconsider it. Now, if I make a motion for reconsideration and you all vote against it, that is actually a violation of the Sunshine Law if we were told that we could have a chance again if it was brought up by the public, because yesterday, we acted without proper information. Committee Chair Chock: I think we have a well-established process. If anything wants to be revisited, it needs to be done in a specific process of reintroducing it. Councilmember Yukimura: I will introduce... Committee Chair Chock: That is the normal process that we go through. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: That is still on the table at any time if that is... Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, but if the reconsideration is denied by vote of the... Committee Chair Chock: Then the body has spoken. SPECIAL PLANNING 24 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: But we did not have the information or the public testimony before we acted. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, let us deal with this at the break because I need a caption break. Mr. Shigemoto, did you have a question? Mr. Shigemoto: Just in case this comes up again, can we get a little time to know what amendments are going to be brought back? Committee Chair Chock: I wish that was so easy, but we have been struggling with doing so. What we did is none of us see the amendments because it is against the law. So we did it all one time yesterday and that was as soon as we could get it out to the public. It is on our website, so people can see it. Mr. Shigemoto: We had a schedule way back when. Are all of these amendments going to be taken care of by tomorrow? Committee Chair Chock: There is a good chance that all of these amendments will be talked about and voted on. That does not mean that if there are concerns with the amendment, as Councilmember Yukimura is suggesting, that they cannot be reintroduced in order for us to talk about it, but they do need to go through a process in order to do so. Mr. Shigemoto: But is the intent to do it hopefully by tomorrow or carryover for next week? Committee Chair Chock: No. For clarity of everyone, I do not foresee this as the last meeting. My interest would be that it would back to the table at the beginning of the year in order to wrap up any loose ends and any remaining amendments or reintroducing of amendments. We will have more committee meetings scheduled for this. Mr. Shigemoto: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: I hope that answers your question. Mr. Shigemoto: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura: Chair? Committee Chair Chock: Yes? Councilmember Yukimura: The burden of providing information is on the Planning Department, which has proposed the provisional agriculture, and on the landowner, if the landowner...well, because the landowner is involved and especially if the landowner requested this kind of designation, which is not clear, which is part of the problem when amendments are made through a public process, rather than by private application of the owner. SPECIAL PLANNING 25 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: I would like to ask Mr. Shigemoto to present information about what those lands are planned to be develop. Council Chair Rapozo: Chair, let me make a real quick point of order. This is public testimony and Mr. Shigemoto came to testify about the moratorium language. He did not mention provisional agriculture or provisional resort. It is totally inappropriate for a Member here to treat him as a witness in a court case. It is not open season to talk about any...his three (3) minutes of testimony...we can ask a clarifying question, as it is in the rule, but that is not a clarifying question. That is a whole new can of worms that she is trying to get... Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. I will have no more discussion on it. As the Chair, it is my right. I am going to call for a caption break at this time. We will come back to public testimony. Thank you. There being no objections, the meeting recessed at 10:36 a.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:51 a.m., and proceeded as follows: Committee Chair Chock: Welcome back from our caption break. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you, Chair. I just wanted to apologize and explain that I was not asking Mr. Shigemoto during question and answer to provide the information. I wanted it at a later date, but before we make our decision, because I feel it is basic information that we need for making decisions. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you very much. Let us get back to public testimony. Next speaker. Ms. Tabalba: The next speaker is Greg Allan. Committee Chair Chock: Mr. Allan. GREG ALLAN: My name is Greg Allan. I own Harbor Mall and have owned it for about seventeen (17) years. The major problem my tenants have is finding employees. Civilization requires people, a vibrant population, and youth. If we only have old and wealthy people, who will do the work? We rely on each other, the youth rely on the old people to help them get established and the old people rely on the youth to provide services and to make a society work. In Kaua`i, we have to make room for our citizens. The biggest need we have...the first thing you need when you are born is food and shelter. Those are the two biggest things. Everything else is after that. Those are the major, major things. The world population has gone up four times in the last sixty (60) years. Kauai has doubled. Okay, so we had less growth. I represent Hokua Place and the roads that we go through on Kapa`a...there are infrastructure issues and there has been some SPECIAL PLANNING 26 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING discussion of infrastructure. That infrastructure...the roads service Hanalei, Princeville, and Kilauea, which all are growing and developing. I do not know of anything that is being done for the roads by Princeville in Kapa`a, but I wanted to make sure the Council knew that Hokua Place is donating the bypass highway; that Hokua Place is leaving a one hundred (100) feet of land in reserve for future road widening; that Hokua Place has water infrastructure that exceeds by two or three times its use capacity; that sewer is in place; that it has an infrastructure already built and in place for energy that leaves a zero carbon footprint; that it supports the town core of Kapa`a; that it surrounds a school so that people can walk; and that it includes bicycle paths and alternative transportation. If you are going to put more citizens anywhere and we have studies that show there is going to be five thousand (5,000) houses needed in this area in the near future. It makes a lot of sense to put them there. They are out of flood zone. I have a lot of friends in the Kapa'a area and so do all of you. I have friends that have four (4) generations living in one (1) house. I have friends that have closed in the carport that have tents in the backyard on pallets. The people are already there. I do not know that it is really going to change the road that much if people spread out and have a little elbow room and can get something affordable to move into. Infrastructure is usually the result of development. The developers usually end up bearing the cost. We are doing a lot for infrastructure. That is my main point. I just want you to know that we are doing a lot for infrastructure. I also want to make sure everybody in the public knows that it is not a signed "do what you want card" and that we come back to you and we make the decisions together of how it exactly looks, how many units. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. We have a clarifying question from Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you, Greg, for being a landowner who is making information available to the public as to what you are proposing. My question is you said that you have alternative transportation; how is that? Mr. Allan: Our project has eight (8) feet wide bike paths through the project and the plans are to tie it into Kapa'a Town. If you want to see any detailed information, there is a Draft Environmental Impact Study, which is on the Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) website, and it has been vetted by experts in transportation four times, agriculture, water, and everything. It actually is what is known as a "FONSI," which is a "Finding Of No Significant Impact." There are always impacts, but the idea is not to create a significant negative impact, but to do good. Councilmember Yukimura: Do you have sidewalks or pedestrian... Mr. Allan: All the roads through the project will have sidewalks and bike paths so that it is encouraging; it is next to Kapa'a Town. So the encouragement is that you can ride to Kapa'a Town, hit the bike path, and you can do the whole Kapa'a corridor. Councilmember Yukimura: Right. SPECIAL PLANNING 27 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Allan: A lot of people complain about sitting in Kapa'a for fifteen (15) minutes in their air-conditioned car—well, get a bike. I lived on Maui and rode from Kahului to K3hei every day on a bike and I beat the cars, although the wind was at my back so it kind of helped. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. Do you have any plans to tie transit in? Mr. Allan: Yes. We have a tentative plan. I was told that you say a lot of things, but it is not in writing; this is the body where it will eventually be in writing, right? We have talked to the Transportation Agency about a discount and they are willing to give a significant discount if we make a requirement that everybody in the project buy a bus pass. Our request was that if we buy a bus pass for a household, anybody in the household can use it so that it is affordable, repeating monthly, and anybody in your household can ride the bus. That is something that we have discussed with Transportation. Committee Chair Chock: Again, I do not want this to go into a discussion. We do not even have an amendment on this particular property at this time. I would encourage it for this discussion and the clarity of what it is we are investing in as a community. It is not on the table. If that is where this body would like to go, then I would encourage that amendment to be presented. Councilmember Yukimura: Chair, the thing that is on the table is that there is a General Plan Designation for Hokua Place, so I should be able to ask questions about it. It is on the main motion to adopt. Committee Chair Chock: I think you know what my expectation is out of the public testimony process. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: If you have any further clarifying questions, I will allow it. If not, we will continue with public testimony. Councilmember Yukimura: I do. You said you have studies showing that you need five thousand (5,000) units in the area; what study is this? Mr. Allan: There are State housing studies that show that is a projected study in the near future, 2035 I believe. Councilmember Yukimura: Can you make that available or the pages that are relevant? Mr. Allan: Thank you very much. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. SPECIAL PLANNING 28 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: I have a question. Do we have Hokua as an amendment coming up? Committee Chair Chock: There is no amendment on the table. Councilmember Kagawa: No amendment on the table regarding Hokua? Committee Chair Chock: No. Councilmember Kagawa: So that would be the time...I was wondering if there were any plans to have them? I think the developer should be here answering questions if we have one. Committee Chair Chock: My take is that it is an important issue and should be discussed. I need to have an amendment on the table. If someone is willing to and would like to introduce that to have that discussion, then I would... Councilmember Kagawa: For me, if there was an amendment, I probably would have some questions, but if there is no amendment then I have no questions at this time. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, I can do an amendment for the sake of discussion, but I want to say that I believe the main motion is to adopt the plan that residential areas on the plan, and I have a right to ask for information, because it is hard to craft an amendment without all of the information. I also wanted the public to know that information. Greg has been very good, as you all know, in talking to us individually in meetings, but I do not know that the public has all of the information. That is why I have earlier asked the Chair that we have a time in this process to really focus on Hokua Place, like we have done with other subjects. Committee Chair Chock: We have had the ample time in our discussion process and we have asked actually for Members to be here by your request or anyone else's request to be here to discuss these items. It did not come up unfortunately and that is where we are at this point. At this point, because we are in the amendment process, we will take amendments and utilize them for discussion purposes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I will be introducing an amendment by request. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you very much. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I just want to say for the record that you have given everybody a lot of time to look at this and look over the plan and we went over every single question in the General Plan throughout the past how many weeks. I do not want the message to be that this is the only time we can ask about information or we have to make a split decision. You have gone out of your way to allow all of that information exchange, so I do not want it to be like, "Oh, only now we are looking at this and need to ask questions," because we have had a lot of time to look over an SPECIAL PLANNING 29 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING read the plan and get any questions we needed out. I just wanted to thank you for that and not have it be that we are making split decisions. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Brun: I am going to agree with Councilmember Kaneshiro. We have been going through this General Plan for how many months and all of a sudden today we have two (2) people...Tom Shigemoto and Greg up here and we are bashing them with new amendments. We just had two hundred fifty (250) amendments introduced, and all of a sudden, we did not get time to work with these folks; I think we had enough time and it did not come up. We are still discussing these things. Chair, I think you did a great job of giving everybody time. Please just stop the nonsense and stop having it just keep on going on. If we have an amendment then let us talk about it. If not, let the person move on. They are trying to do public testimony and we are scrutinizing them. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I do agree that you have done a good job, Chair. But I also... Committee Chair Chock: Please continue. Councilmember Yukimura: I also know that we have had about three (3) months with a lot of other matters on the table. The Planning Department had three (3) years and one million dollars ($1,000,000) to put this together and we have a responsibility. I have never said that I have been complete with my amendments. You know that I have been working throughout this whole period to try to work with citizens and work with the plan, and if there are unfinished business, I think we need to fully vet it. Committee Chair Chock: Understood. Thank you very much. Thank you for your testimony. Would anyone else like to testify? This will be the last chance to testify on the General Plan for this week and on these amendments. We will have another committee meeting with potentially more amendments. As of today or this week, this is the last chance. Councilmember Yukimura: Chair, just one other clarification about process? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: So I heard that we can get resource people or the people who have generated amendments up to talk when we are talking about the amendments. Committee Chair Chock: If we need them, yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. SPECIAL PLANNING 30 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Mehana. MEHANA BLAICH VAUGHAN: Aloha mai kahou. I just wanted to thank everybody for the amazing work you did yesterday. This is a hard process and it is challenging and overwhelming for everybody. You are keeping track of so much. You did some really historic and incredible things yesterday in the area of water. I want to thank you for the work on Princeville. Thank you for everyone who made that possible: the landowner, the longtime employees of Princeville, and the hundreds of community members who took time to testify and sign petitions. They really were heard and were grateful. I just wanted to mention two (2) things that are before you today, one is an amendment to enhance protection of open space and it just simply says to pursue... Councilmember Yukimura: Can you tell us which page? Ms. Vaughan: Yes, it is Committee Chair Chock's proposed amendments and it is supported by the Planning Department and I urge you to support it. It is multiple ways of working with landowners to pursue easements, acquisitions, stewardship and landowner agreements, to expand open space access and protection of coastal lands in wilderness areas. There is also language that I think is really important to promote access with kuleana. For landowners, it is really hard to let folks on their lands, because there is no stop. The blue book, the blogs...it is going to be every person in the world going all over the place and that is a problem across Hawaii. The State, the County, and landowners do need community presence on our lands. It is overwhelming and people cannot do it alone. So this is to promote access with kuleana and expand arrangements, like the hui maka`ainana have, Kaneiolouma, to support more community projects that are taking care of places, in more ways that people can go to places, in ways that they are giving back. This is in Councilmember Chock's proposals. I also support those in Councilmember Yukimura's package. They seem really well thought-out. I want to highlight and thank Councilmember Kaneshiro for the package he introduced, and the Planning Department and their emphasis on tourism and how people are feeling overwhelmed. At the end of Council Chair Rapozo's package, there is a very important amendment about airports and harbors in trying to keep the scale of their development in sync with a quality visitor and resident experience. I wanted to call your attention to that because it is crucial. I also think the monitoring issues, how we monitor this plan, is going to be really important so that all of your work matters. Lastly, the one thing that is not in this plan, I would like to work on going forward and whatever way appropriate, is protection of kuleana and ohana lands on our island. Right now, you can move those lands and relocate them in a subdivision process, so that means they are very vulnerable and that a lo`i in Hanapepe Valley can suddenly become a ridge lot and others can want to buy it who might have not have otherwise and that family can lose that and that is something we need to change. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Mahalo nui. Anyone else who has not had a chance to testier, this is your last chance. Going once, going twice? Okay, we will live with our decisions for now. I will call the meeting back to order at this time. I would like to pick up where we last left off, which was on Chair Rapozo's amendments. SPECIAL PLANNING 31 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING There being no objections, the meeting was called back to order, and proceeded as follows: Council Chair Rapozo: Remind me where we left off? Committee Chair Chock: It was Amendment#5. We chose to skip over the moratoria, and actually, we had gone through the rest of your amendments, but there were some questions on the watershed as well. I think that Planning has come back with some suggestions and maybe that is where you would like to start. Council Chair Rapozo: I did want to make a comment about the moratorium language, because obviously, it was pretty clear by testimony we heard today that the perception is that this is targeted for a landowner. I do not know how much clearer to put this. I think if you have followed this County Council for any length of time, you would know that I have been one of the strongest opponents to moratoriums. I do not believe those things are...it is a scary word...however, a lot of the public, during the testimonies that I have heard throughout this process...the perception was that the Council could do a moratorium just because they wanted to. We had numerous testifiers come up and say, "We need a moratorium,"without really understanding what a moratorium was or what is required before any Council or any entity can impose a moratorium. Mauna Kea was solicited for his legal research and we wanted to put in language in the General Plan that actually clarified what, in fact, a moratorium is. Obviously, by the testimony today, it was clear that maybe the general public is not aware of what this amendment is and someone told the general public, "You better go and testify against that moratorium, because it is going to hurt a private landowner." Nothing in this amendment relates to any landowner or any specific person or entity. It is frustrating for me when I hear that, especially from someone that I really respect. This clearly...I raised this yesterday and maybe it did not get heard, but I think the language in here is very clear that it talks about what is required and also the dangers of a moratorium or the disadvantages of a moratorium. That is all in here. But that selectively was not discussed or was not portrayed to the community by people. They forgot about that part. They talked about how dangerous and scary the word is, but not the fact that, "Anybody imposing a moratorium should be aware that they may tend to discourage quality developments, for tax based enhancement, achieving of regional planning goals, and deny needed housing." These are the things that Councils have to determine or think about before they go down the road of a moratorium. This is guiding language, which is what the General Plan is, for any future Council to look at before they even consider a moratorium. So that is what this is all about. It has nothing to do with...it is not giving the Council any more authority than it already has; it just clarifies what is required and also what the negative impacts might be. Chair, I want to make that clear because I do not think that it is fair...the fact that it is a scary word...there are a lot of scary words in our vocabulary and our dictionary, and the fact that it is a scary word should not prohibit us from clarifying what that word means in the General Plan. That is all I was trying to do. I appreciate Mauna Kea's legal work in getting this done. I can bring Mauna Kea up if you want to. He is uncomfortable with changing the language of the verbiage because it is based off of legal research that took a lot of time and a lot of resources. If this body feels that it is a scary word, then let us just take it out. Again, I do not want to alter the language that Mauna SPECIAL PLANNING 32 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Kea has spent a lot of time and energy in. That would be my commentary. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you very much. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I think I understand what the Chair is saying, which is mainly actually describing what is legally possible and outlining the parameters as to when it could be used and when it should not be used. I am just wondering, it seems to me that we could do just a short paragraph and have this entire piece be in addendum as part of a legal support. I am just wondering as a compromise whether that could work. It really is just describing the legal parameters of a moratorium when it is possible and advisable and when it should not be used. It is sort of...you could do it as an addendum, but put something in the main text, which would be a like a short paragraph that says, "This is a tool that can be used and should be used when it is appropriate." Committee Chair Chock: Others have mentioned moving it to the Appendix or somewhere else where it is...because it is descriptive and not directive, to have it elsewhere. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: I appreciate the comment. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, and it is a very long piece. Councilmember Kagawa: For me, I am not comfortable with any of them, so when Members are ready, I am ready to make a motion to vote on it ad seriatim. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion on this particular amendment? When you are looking at this amendment in particular, I am guessing that we need to vote it up or down, and then move it somewhere else if necessary, or as you have mentioned, coming back with some new language. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, so you are suggesting that rather than amend this amendment later on come up with another amendment? Committee Chair Chock: That is something that needs to be furthered discussed. Council Chair Rapozo: I would recommend that. I am not a fan of amending amendments, really because of the Staffs work. If you folks are not comfortable with this language then vote it down and do an amendment, because that is the cleanest and easiest way for our Staff. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. SPECIAL PLANNING 33 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion on this item? Councilmember Kaneshiro: What are we discussing now? Committee Chair Chock: Just the moratorium. I would like to have the discussion of all of these amendments in this package and then we will come back and do it at seriatim. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: I guess being part of the process with Mauna Kea, I am a little bit more comfortable. I totally get the...and I appreciate the comments by Mr. Shigemoto in terms of it being a spooky word and I think it is something that we need to be very cognizant of—I am okay with moving it somewhere else and I am okay with changing the language. I cannot discount the fact that as a body, we have received time and time again this issue about Kaua`i growing out of proportion; yet, we, as leaders, are being faced with this question every day, and we are asked to deal with this issue. It is housing and traffic; what are we going to do about this stuff? This is a real tangible solution that has been put on the table for discussion. Again, it is not directive at all. To me, it is just descriptive of what it is as a tool. At some point, I feel like we have to step up and say what our options are for the future of this island and that is what this does. The other leaders who will be stepping into this seat will say, "You know what, this is something that we have to look at." The truth is that if any moratorium was to be put in place, it would take us years in order to get there and that is because legally, we need plans and studies that clearly direct a specific moratorium and we are far away from that. Without understanding what the tool is and how to utilize it properly, we will never have options available to us. Just for those reasons, I respect the intent of this amendment. Council Chair Rapozo: Let me just say that whether it is in the General Plan or not, that option remains available. So this is more of a clarifying...I like the way you put it...descriptive versus directive. It is what it is. To even try to define that as something else...it is not fair. It is what it is. It is an option that we have, whether it is in a General Plan or not. I am hoping that with it being in the General Plan, not just the Council, but the public will get to see what a moratorium is all about and what I think the testifier mentioned, risk and rewards. There are some big risks when you go down the road of a moratorium. That is clearly explained in this text. I am not sure where this whole perception of going after a specific landowner came up. I have no clue, but I also think that is unfair to portray it that way, because that is simply not what this does. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Any more discussion on this item? Councilmember Yukimura: I think when we started this process, the thought was, "Moratorium—there is no role for it, it is not even legal." I think this piece—and mahalo, Mauna Kea—it shows when it can be useful and when it should not be used and that is very important as a tool for managing growth. While the risks SPECIAL PLANNING 34 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING are great, if it is done well, the rewards are great, too, because you get some control over growth and you have a better planned community in the end and everybody benefits from that. Landowners and citizens benefit from orderly growth where our roads work and it is a really beautiful place and people still want to come and buy property and live here. Knowing that we have this tool and how to use it is, I think, a very useful thing to have in the General Plan. It is not saying that we are going to stop growth right now, but it does give us a tool for addressing what is the crux of our challenge today, as a beautiful island, where there is a lot of people who want to just come in and buy and use all of the resources, and we have to figure out a way that the local people can benefit from it and things can work well for everybody. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just do not know...I understand the concept and people are frustrated, but I think we are muddying the issue. I do not know how in good conscience I could ever support a moratorium when we have a severe affordable housing shortage. I myself have two (2) kids that hopefully will be able to live on Kauai, and if I am one (1) person, then there are thousands of people like me that have kids that hopefully want to have their kids live on Kauai. How does a moratorium address those issues? Let us be clear about the issue—it is scary, because when you take a look at the language, here are some of the things that are cited in this language: water and sewage connections, multi-family affordable housing or residential development, condominium development, driveways, opening of new businesses, university expansion, wilderness outfitter permits...whatever that is...homes for the disabled. These are all things that are thrown in this moratorium language, so when we hear testimony just saying that it is scary and we try to encourage economic development—well, here is why it is scary, because in this very language, it has things that our community needs. We need to have homes for the disabled. Right now, the Regency at Pua Kea has a waiting list of like fifty (50) people that can afford to get in there. There is a reason why people are scared of this language. I think when we talk about moratorium, the general consensus is that, "We do not want any more huge, multimillion dollar developments that are geared just for people that are wealthy." But that does not say that in here. So when people are testifying and saying, "This is scary"—I disagree...I do not think it was targeted at any one particular landowner, it was just that the testifier just happened to say that he is ranching on this land and it happens to be owned by Grove Farm. But we saw A&B come and other people come out. It is not targeted. I do not think the message was to target any one particular landowner. But I do not know how I can continue to serve the island and say, "Hey, we are going to increase our inventory of affordable housing. We have to move towards more assisted-living facilities and facilities for our kupuna," and then say our solution is a moratorium? I, in my own good conscience, would not be able to say that and not be hypocritical. Thank you, Chair. I agree that the way that this is worded can be perceived as "scary." I do know that it is a tool, but whether or not it belongs in the General Plan is where I am having my holdups. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kaneshiro. SPECIAL PLANNING 35 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kaneshiro: Yes, I am under the same impression. We always heard of a moratorium and I have heard moratorium the entire time I have been on Kaua`i, but do I think it should be in the General Plan? For me, I do not think so. I think it provides false hope. Everybody goes out and campaigns that we need housing, and then to give this false hope that there is a possibility that we can stop housing or stop the development with the moratorium—to me, it is scary and unfair. I am not comfortable having it in there. It is not to say that it is not an option, but I can see it as a tool where any development that comes up, they will say, "We should have a moratorium on it because traffic is impacted." Every single project anywhere that comes up, we have heard it with Hokua Place, Princeville, and all of these projects. I think people will say, "We have this moratorium language in the General Plan. They should have a moratorium." I am just very hesitant to put that type of language in the General Plan. There is a process that people have to go through. There is a process to change land at the Land Use Commission from agriculture to residential or whatever it is. There is a process at the Planning Commission. There are all of these processes in place where the public can say, "We object to this project because of these impacts," but I think just a moratorium and the language in there, to me, I think it provides some sense of false hope. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I get the feeling from my colleagues that maybe I am introducing a resolution to implement a moratorium right now. That is kind of what I feel. This has absolutely nothing to do with...if there is a costal surge of ocean and it is threatening a development that is going to happen in Wailua's Coconut Marketplace; what is so scary about the County Council putting a moratorium on future development on that for six (6) months or four (4) months to determine what the impact of that shoreline erosion will be? That is not scary. That is something that we should do. Senior housing and affordable housing is all in here because it talks about what you can affect if, in fact, you implement a moratorium. Councils of the future need to realize that a moratorium is not something you just simply do. You have to consider all of the impacts. I cannot imagine any Council moving forward on a moratorium that was going to affect senior housing or affordable housing. This is a tool that is not used regularly throughout the country and it needs to pass a very strict legal test before you can go forward. Again, this is more descriptive than directive, but I will respect the votes of this body. I am just saying that I do not think it is a bad as it being portrayed. That is just my opinion. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you very much. Further discussion? Councilmember Yukimura: A moratorium by definition and legal requirements needs to be selective, because it has to be based on the need and it is one of the ways to ensure that resources go to local needs rather than off-island needs. For example, in the moratorium that I crafted, but actually never introduced, because developers came to the table and addressed the real need, which was traffic circulation in Po`ipn-K5loa, and that was the request of the community. It was not against housing, it was just against the building of resorts until things could be just held in abeyance until we could figure things out in terms of traffic circulation. I would say today that traffic circulation, though not without problems, is probably the SPECIAL PLANNING 36 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING best in the Koloa-Po`ipu area compared to other areas, because we used the moratorium in the best way, which was in a threat that did not happen, and then the developers came to the table with the community and figured out the problem. It is not about stopping all growth...you cannot do that...you have to say what is the limitation; is it sewers? Is it water? Is it too much growth and inadequate infrastructure? You can be selective. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Brun. We can have more discussion on this item and I just want to point out that we do have Mauna Kea, he is the author of this amendment and if anyone has questions about the limitations or parameters of it, we can have him up. Councilmember Brun: For me, this is new stuff for me. This thing just came out and I have been looking at it. Right now, I am kind of struggling in trying to support it and go that angle. We are here trying to build houses and I guess I do not really understand it, so I am not going to vote yes on it and hurt later on. It can always be introduced again and be brought back, but right now, I am struggling to support it. We hear all the time about traffic, traffic, traffic—yes, we have some bad traffic, but it is not that bad. You go to O`ahu and it is much worse. We can laugh...half an hour and we are screaming that we are in traffic. Go to Oahu when you are three (3) and four (4) hours in traffic or in Los Angeles or New York. You look where all of our money is spent...I am so over this traffic stuff...all of our money is spent in Los Angeles and New York and Hawaii, spent on O`ahu—did we fix the traffic problem on Oahu? No, absolutely not. We are always bringing it back to traffic and I do not think we are ever going to fix traffic, so we are never going to build affordable housing because we cannot fix our traffic. That is the part I am struggling with. We are going to keep on getting our people on the beach because we cannot fix our traffic. So let us wait and let us not do anything until we fix our traffic. Our traffic will probably never be fixed, truthfully, straight up. That is just my opinion and you can agree with it or not, but we will never solve our traffic problems. We need houses now, so let us do it. We are not going to fix our traffic. I promise you that. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Just as a clarifying question...because I think Item#1 and there is a few more items that follow it that have moratorium language. For Item#2, I did not think it had moratorium language on it, but I just want to make sure that when we go through it that when we vote on one thing and we know what we are voting for, so we do not say, "One, yes; two, no; three, no." Councilmember Kagawa: We are voting ad seriatim. Committee Chair Chock: Can I ask Mauna Kea if that is okay? Let us see...Items... MAUNA KEA TRASK, County Attorney: Item#11. Committee Chair Chock: Which is all related to the moratorium. SPECIAL PLANNING 37 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Trask: For the record, Mauna Kea Trask, County Attorney. So I drafted, at the direction of Committee Chair, amendment Items #1 through#11 and that was trying to understand what Ms. Walton and her group were saying to see if there if it could be supported by the law, so this is what I got. Regarding Councilmember Kaneshiro's question, for#2, one of the amendments that Ms. Walton had was about implementation, so all of this...one, two, three, four, five paragraphs into are actually all taken from Chapter 7 of the Kauai County Code. It is existing language and I kind of contemplated whether to include it or not, but the one thing that the Planning Director said on the record, which kind of resonated with me during this process was...he said something...I forget what it was, but, "It is stated before, but it is worth restating." In line with that, I thought it was worth restating what the General Plan is, because it is apparent that a lot of people...it is an accessible process and it is a really big tent where people can come in, but it is a policy document so there are limitations to it. So I thought it was good to state those within this context. Aside from that, I can answer any questions you have. Committee Chair Chock: I guess my question would also be around some of what we talked about earlier, which is if we were to take out some of those sections that you just mentioned which is repetitive, if it would still hold the intent as it might be reintroduced separately or in the future. Mr. Trask: Again, none of this is really accidental. I spoke with Ms. Walton after preparing this and getting permission to share it with her; she came with me with a proposal where everything should fit and came back with counter and this is where it is. As far as where it is inserted in the plan, that is a result of those discussions. I really do not know where else it would fit. One thing I do want to say is there were some discussion yesterday about semantics regarding adequate studies or extraordinary studies—I recommend changing nothing. The Chair is correct in that this is an "all or nothing" amendment. I did not make any of this...I will take the kind word, but I am not a genius. I did a lot of research and this was all from a legal treatise that is about two thousand two hundred (2,200) pages long, by...it is not Jared Kushner...it is Jeffrey Kushner or something like that. It is on subdivision growth management control. These are very specific words and they are all supported by and taken from specific case law throughout the country. So "extraordinary"...if it is "adequate" in there, keep it "adequate." "Extraordinary" means something else and it is no more descriptive than"adequate." Because of that, it is very difficult and technical and I recommend changing nothing within the text. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: I just recommend that we move on. There are four (4) votes against it, so let us just move on, please. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a comment. I just want to say that I appreciated Councilmember Brun's honesty and I agree with him that we should not SPECIAL PLANNING 38 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING expect traffic to be solved before we approve housing, but I do think that in choosing housing sites, we should choose the sites where traffic generation will be the least problematic. That is why when we select housing sites within towns where it is close to bus stops and where people do not have to drive far distances, that helps with addressing traffic while we select housing. They do intersect. This thing about traffic always being bad—we actually have a plan that maps a different route than what Honolulu and other places have and I think we have to work on traffic, because we do not want to lower ourselves to the standards of Los Angeles and even Honolulu, because then why would tourists come if they get those places when they come here? I think really solving the traffic problem, and we are the only jurisdiction in the State that has a different approach, but we do have to implement that Multimodal Land Transportation Plan or we are never going to be able to show what it can do to solve our traffic problems. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you very much. We are going to take Items #1 to #11 as one. Let us get through the watershed and then we can take them all. Is that okay? Councilmember Kaneshiro: I was going to suggest that maybe we take it now because we have the discussions fresh in our mind and if we go to the end, we might have... Committee Chair Chock: We might have more discussion afterwards, right? Councilmember Kaneshiro: We might repeat ourselves again and go through the same conversation again. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 5, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Council Chair Rapozo: Someone needs to make a motion to take it ad seriatim because my Amendment#5 includes a bunch of others. Councilmember Yukimura moved to take all items in Amendment #5 ad seriatim, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: You said Items#1 through#11 all at one time, right? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Kagawa: Thank you. Council Chair Rapozo: We just have to take the vote on the motion. SPECIAL PLANNING 39 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING The motion to take all items in Amendment#5 ad seriatim was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Now we can vote. Let us do a roll call for Items#1 through#11 as it relates to the moratorium. Roll call. The motion to approve Items#1-11 in Amendment#5 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEMS #1-11: Chock, Rapozo, Yukimura TOTAL — 3, AGAINST ITEMS#1-11: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL — 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. Committee Chair Chock: The motion fails 3:4. Is there any more discussion on the watershed section? Council Chair Rapozo: We have the watershed section, but also...I was just informed by Staff that you also have amendments pertaining to the watershed. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a suggestion. Council Chair Rapozo: I am sorry, Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: That was Councilmember Chock's by request. I think his followed the... Committee Chair Chock: Yes, they are very similar. Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, very similar and he has the support of Planning, so I do not know if... Councilmember Yukimura: Mr. Chair? Council Chair Rapozo: Let me finish, geez. Committee Chair Chock: Let him finish and then we will entertain your request. Councilmember Yukimura: I apologize. Council Chair Rapozo: I am just suggesting...I am trying to figure out how we get through this quicker and I was advised by the Staff that Councilmember Kaneshiro's amendments, which are being introduced on your behalf, on the watershed, is probably a better one to take at this point, simply because it has the support of Planning and we do not have to beat a dead horse. If there are any others that you find on mine that you want to incorporate, other Members, feel free SPECIAL PLANNING 40 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING to do so. I think it is just more expedient if we do Councilmember Kaneshiro's one in Amendment#9. Committee Chair Chock: Why do we not do this then; is this possible, since we have this open already, to vote on? Councilmember Yukimura, what is your input? Councilmember Yukimura: I do agree that the two (2) need to be coordinated or somehow rationalized together. I do not think we should interrupt this process. Why do we not just ignore or not act on these right now and act on the ones when it comes up in your amendment? Committee Chair Chock: I think that is what the suggestion was. Council Chair Rapozo: That is exactly what I said, but we can take her suggestion if it is going to make her feel better. Let us follow Councilmember Yukimura's suggestion. Councilmember Yukimura: No, I just did not want to go to your amendments right now. That is all I am saying. Committee Chair Chock: Got it. If that is the case, then what we can do...I am not sure...because it is on the table already if we can just move on to the next package. Can we do that? Why do we not do that then? We will move on and come back. We are being told that we do not have to. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. After we finish your whole packet, then withdraw the motion with respect to watershed, so it is not on the floor, or maybe defer it to be considered with Committee Chair Chock's amendment. Council Chair Rapozo: Are we ready? I am assuming that we will just go through this... Committee Chair Chock: That is what I was thinking, okay. Council Chair Rapozo: We are going to defer the watershed section and go right over to economy and tourism. For Item#15, there is no position on this. It really clarifies the numbers to make it a lot clearer that the growth is significant, and then Item #16, which says, "Explore development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity," changing that to, "Establish a carrying capacity for the island and various sites around the island and implement a monitoring system that tracks visitor impacts within the context of`limits of acceptable change."' If you look at the original language, "Explore development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity"—it is almost like an encouragement or basically condoning that maximum number, versus establishing a carrying capacity, figuring out, "Where are we? How much more?" I watched the news this morning and they were bragging about the one hundred twenty-eight million dollar ($128,000,000) hangar that the State helped Hawaiian Airlines buy, along with their flights, bragging about how many more passengers they can bring to Hawai`i—I am thinking, "Our little island here on SPECIAL PLANNING 41 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Kauai, at what point are we going to say, `State, stop sending planes to Kauai. Let us take a timeout."' We cannot do a moratorium on an airline flight, but "take it easy." If you want to take them to Honolulu, then take them all. If you want to take them to Maui or whatever...at some point, Kaua`i has to say, "Timeout." That language basically says that we should establish that capacity and track it. Planning does not support that. Also, "Create a comprehensive incentive and disincentive plan to address visitor numbers and impacts in specific areas." Just trying to get a handle on our carrying capacity. Committee Chair Chock: Any questions on economy and tourism? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: As related to airline flights, the problem is if we build resort units, then there is going to be some people on this island who want to fill the resorts, especially if the additional units start affecting the occupancy of existing hotels. To tell planes not to increase landings, do you see that it sets up this need and it is going to be hard to say, "Do not bring tourists to fill up these empty hotels." That is why the permitting of hotels is the key place to control growth. We can establish a carrying capacity by how many resort units we allow on this island. But nobody has really been thinking or looking at that. I do not know how we establish a carrying capacity. Is there somebody who has done this anywhere in the world? If so, how? Committee Chair Chock: If that is a direct question to the Planning Department, then I will ask them up. Councilmember Yukimura: How about to the generator of the motion as well? Committee Chair Chock: The generator of the motion? Councilmember Yukimura: I am sorry, of the amendment. Is this not by request? So there is somebody who actually proposed the amendment. Council Chair Rapozo: It is a coalition request, but I am introducing it and supporting this. I am not sure what you are asking. Councilmember Yukimura: I am asking whether we have any examples of "establish carrying capacity" and I see Anne saying yes. Council Chair Rapozo: So you need an example to support the language? Councilmember Yukimura: It is a reasonable question to ask whether it has been done before and how it has been done. That is what I would ask Planning. If they can answer it, fine, but what if somebody else in this room can answer it? Why would we not have them part of the conversation? Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. SPECIAL PLANNING 42 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kawakami: I think where there is some conflict on this is the general philosophy of the purpose of a general plan. I agree that there should be some sort of carrying capacity that we should use as a benchmark when taking a look at growth and what our island can actually handle as far as visitor arrivals. I think where the challenge is, is that the General Plan in its essence should be general and sort of a guiding light in the direction that we move in, versus this language seems to be prescriptive and actually dictates that word to "establish carrying capacity" and not only to establish it in mandating it, but it sounds like it is mandating language to implement a monitoring system and we have no idea what that monitoring system is, if that is a new employee, if that is a whole system that is tied to Information Technology (IT). Just from hearing what the philosophy of the General Plan is and what it is supposed to be that I am assuming that the support or lack of support from Planning comes because this is mandating tourists. But that is just my read on it. Councilmember Yukimura: Why can we not ask them up? Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I just wanted to say that in the General Plan, every section has a section that says "actions" where we are stating some actions that are to be done. Really, it is a directive and to look at establishing a carrying capacity. I do not think it is the departure from the General Plan's purpose, I think every section has that, whether it is establishing something, determining a number. This is simply an extension of that. I would be interested in hearing from Planning to find out what part of it they do not support and maybe we can come to some kind of agreement. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: To be clear, this is not in the Action area; this is under Plans and Studies. So it is not the same thing. Every section does have action items, but this one is not in the Action item. Committee Chair Chock: What I would like to do is suspend the rules. I am going to ask the Planning Director and the coalition representative, Anne, to come up. We are going to pose the question that is on the table, stated by Councilmember Yukimura. There being no objections, the rules were suspended. Councilmember Yukimura: Before asking Planning why they do not support it, I would like to ask Anne whether this tool, if you will, or this planning concept or tool, has been done elsewhere and how it has worked. Ms. Walton: The answer is yes. It has been used...sort of the oldest model that we have is the Galapagos, which is as you know, a remote island chain, who have had the same problem where tourism started to outstrip the number of residents that are living there and change the quality of life for people there. It is SPECIAL PLANNING 43 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING also a use in the Seychelles Islands, which are in the Indian Ocean. These are considered the models. But it is pretty standard operating procedure now in a lot of places around the world. This is not something new. I have to say that the operative piece is not the carrying capacity piece as much as it is the limits of acceptable change. If I could explain that, because that is really what comes before the carrying capacity. What it says is that a place establishes what those limits of acceptable change are from the impacts of tourism. It could be applied in other areas, but it is most commonly applied to tourism, visitors and visitor use, and the impacts visitors have. It says that you need to establish what are those areas of impacts and at what level is it no longer acceptable for change? You introduce humans into any environment and increase the number of humans and then humans who are recreating, because that is what people do when they are tourists, and what are those impacts, and what point is their threshold which those changes no longer acceptable? It can be applied to the environment. It can be applied to residents. It is no longer acceptable in terms of quality of life for residents. It can be applied to the visitor experience itself. It can be applied in specific areas in terms of overburdening your roads, traffic situation, or infrastructure. So a decision has to be made, what are the parameters that we are looking at in terms of limits of acceptable change, where are we no longer having issues from visitor impacts? Do we want to start to put some controls? Then you need to understand visitor behavior and those numbers to visitors that which if you see that number, the impact in that area is no longer acceptable, and it can be to the community or a managing entity of some sort, agency, or department. Councilmember Yukimura: It sounds like the exercise that the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) has done with Ha'ena State Park. Ms. Walton: It has and Hanauma Bay is an example of where they have used limits of acceptable change or levels of acceptable change in carrying capacity. That is a fully controlled environment where they have exercised this tool, which is harder to do islandwide. Councilmember Yukimura: That is what I wanted to ask. Ms. Walton: So you could pick discrete areas to start to experiment with how this is working, like Ha`ena State Park or Koke`e might be a place you might want to start using this model and seeing how it applies. Councilmember Yukimura: But this is saying establish a carrying capacity for the island and various sites around the island. Ms. Walton: So you can do this islandwide or pick discrete sites. It is applied both ways in different places. Obviously, it gets more complex if you are doing it islandwide. Councilmember Yukimura: Is it anywhere that has been done islandwide? Ms. Walton: Galapagos. SPECIAL PLANNING 44 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Where? Ms. Walton: Galapagos. Councilmember Yukimura: What is the population of Galapagos? Ms. Walton: I am sorry, I forgot all of the particulars of that. Councilmember Yukimura: But it is a much less populated area... Ms. Walton: It is spread over multiple islands, so population-wise, it is probably no less...probably comparable to Kauai, but there are two (2) main inhabited islands in Galapagos. Councilmember Yukimura: So we are dealing with populations in the tens of thousands? Fifty thousand (50,000) to seventy thousand (70,000)? Oh, twenty-six thousand (26,000). Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Follow-up, Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: I like that concept and like how you described the levels of acceptable change. For our economy, it would also be good to do almost like a (inaudible) study on the levels of acceptable change; with the loss of visitor arrivals, how many jobs would be cost? How would it impact our revenue generation as far as state and local government because the amount of General Excise Tax (GET) or Transient Accommodations Tax (TAT) or property tax revenue that comes from the resorts? Have you ever seen a study being done in conjunction on I guess both ends, like as a community tries to seek and strike that right balance, there are two (2) sides to it, right? There is that level of acceptable change, the growth of the visitor industry, and also what is that level of acceptable change? On the loss of the visitor industry, how many people would be unemployed? Have you ever seen a model being done that really seeks what we are trying to do, which is to try and find that right balance. I do not think we can say, "No more visitors, we do not want them." Then there is that fine line. Have you ever seen a study being done? Ms. Walton: I have not, but the economic issue does come up in conjunction with this and trying to find that optimal range of the number of visitors is something that is used in this model. There is probably some work that has been done. I do not know about it, but I think that is an interesting way to look at it as well as you want to maintain a certain optimal range of the number of visitors so that economically it allows it the industry to still be viable. Councilmember Kawakami: Would it be that far off if we were just to use the existing language that says to explore development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity that considers the context of limits of acceptable change and is that a far departure from your proposed language to just adding on language. I would like to hear from Planning on what their thoughts are. I will be honest with you that what a lot of people are worried about is language where people will come and say, SPECIAL PLANNING 45 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING "This document says that you have to establish the carrying capacity," and our hands may be tied as far as resources as having the expertise to being able to do that. We do not know what kind of resources, if that requires software upgrades or what kind of studies. There are some fiscal impacts tied to establishing this maximum carrying capacity. I think that is where the General Plan falls into place where we are trying to be general in nature because we want to avoid having somebody say, "Hey, take a look at this. You have to." Then we are like, "But we do not. We do not have anybody that knows how to do it. We would have to fly somebody in from Galapagos Island to help us do this thing." It is one of those things, but it is a reality. Ms. Walton: Well, I would advise calling on Alan Wong from O`ahu, but I think to answer your question, the real tricky part of this is determining what are those areas that are your priorities that you are looking at in terms of impacts. So where is the level of acceptable change and what does that apply to specifically to the environment, to the economy, and to local residents, determining what that is and then determining what the threshold is of acceptable change. In natural resource management, for instance, we look at loss of healthy coral reef coverage. That gives us a parameter, a measure to know the level of impact that is acceptable, and you can measure whether you have had more loss and is acceptable. It has been done. You have to apply that to visitor experience. You could then apply that to resident experience. That has been done. The real tricky piece of this is the monitoring. If you say, "Okay, in Ha`ena State Park, the maximum number of people in any given week or on any given day is one hundred fifty (150) people," then you are going to have to monitor what those impacts are, and that is really the most intensive piece of this, is the monitoring component. Then you may have to adjust those numbers when you see what the impacts are from certain numbers of people. Councilmember Kawakami: So I think what we are trying to do, and I hear that you are going into the procedure of this type of exercise on the acceptable change and the monitoring, but I think what we are trying to do is figure out the level of acceptable change that both parties are willing to accept so that we can get language in here that kind of accomplishes what we are seeking to accomplish without it being so...in my opinion at least...this is only my opinion...being to prescriptive and mandating. Ms. Walton: Yes. I think what we are interested in are controls on the numbers and visitors and their impacts; bottom line. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I want to hear from Planning. Councilmember Kawakami: Yes, I was going to ask Planning if he had any feedback on where the rub is with the language and what your philosophy is. If I am way off base, I would love to hear it all. MICHAEL A. DAHILIG, Planning Director: We brought up this concern to the Council during our presentations regarding carrying capacity, and the coalition throughout the process with the Planning Commission, as well as our public process SPECIAL PLANNING 46 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING has brought this issue up time and time again. As we raised with our presentations, we looked at Bhutan...we raised Bhutan as an example of what can be done to address this issue of carrying capacity, but we raised a caution during our presentation to explain that while countries like Bhutan or Chile, with respect to the Galapagos Islands, Japan with Okinawa, Belize, Seychelles as a British Territory— all of these do not necessary have the constraint that we have as a part of the United States, which is the constitutional right to travel. While we believe that the idea of trying to look at a number and a benchmark to measure where we are and whether or not the impacts have a downstream effect from tourism actually creating negative impacts to our island. We need to be able to work around this notion of being in line with the constitutional right to travel. Why we propose it as a plan is because we want it to be responsive to what we were hearing, that we were listening and saying, "Okay, we need to have at least a number or a benchmark of how to do that." There is not really much methodology of this because we cannot find methodology that is similar to United States jurisdictions for this type of thing. We have things that are specific to areas, but not to an overall county. So why we raised the "do not support" was that we believe it is a little bit ahead of the curve to be able to justify something like a disincentive plan to keep visitors out, which could run afoul of the constitutional right to travel. We believe there is enough merit to explore more exploration and how to get more information to the public where we should be in measuring, but if it is with the premise that it is going to disincentivize travel, it needs to be very, very with caution that we are not running afoul over our constitutional duties. Councilmember Kawakami: So if we had established that the maximum carrying capacity was one thousand (1,000),just a number, because we only have one thousand (1,000) units of accommodation that can hold one thousand (1,000) people and if we were to hit that limit, there is no way we could say, "We cannot take anymore." Is that what you are saying? There is no way to constitutionally say, "No, you cannot come here," even if we do not have any more hotel rooms and there is no place, then we cannot stop them? Mr. Dahilig: I think that it harkens back to the very first presentation we had with our department when we brought in the former Statistics Director from Hawai`i Tourism Authority (HTA). The airlift is what the gatekeeper is to a lot of this and how the airlift throttles who comes to the island. We have stories of people renting that are renting as vacation rentals, tents on a platform and a bucket to do their thing in. That is the kind of downstream effect that was very apparent to us as being able to take a look at the airlift and what comes in, but it is not something that we can say, "We are going to stop all of these flights from coming in here." But if we do not expand the airport or expand certain infrastructure items, then there is the natural carrying capacity that comes as consequence of these gatekeeper items. So that is why we are in support of looking at Item #28 in the Chair's amendments that says, "We have to look at the airport and harbor improvements as a way to balance and manage tourism impacts." We are well-aware of this being a need. We need to have more transparency as to what we can carry as an island, but looking at it in this context, we believe, could raise some legal issues. SPECIAL PLANNING 47 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: We are still talking about capacity, right? Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: That last paragraph, "create a comprehensive disincentive plan to address visitor numbers and impacts in specific areas"—that is not talking about airline arrivals; it is talking about specific areas on the island, such as the beach parks. That is what we are talking about that when we get to a point... when you determine that carrying capacity, like they are doing in Ha`ena, but for us in Lydgate or whatever it may be; as numbers grow, are we able to or should we be putting some disincentives, charging a fee or putting up a gate closing the park? The problem right now is that even today at Lydgate, we cannot take care of that park. I do not know if we have reached our carrying capacity, but as far as our ability to maintain the place, we have. We are not talking about the airlines coming here—we obviously know that we live in America and there is a constitutional right to travel, but this does not address that. This is specific areas on the island. Mr. Dahilig: I think that was our issue was when we looked at paragraph a. "for the island." Reading it together with paragraph b. was where we were coming from that analysis. We do not dispute and we actually support the idea that things like Ha`ena where they are talking about the carrying capacity for the amount of visitors that can enter that park. I think that is the type of management that we encourage, and in fact, through permitting, we are trying to encourage the State to actually implement that plan. If it is a matter of the intent being behind specific places on the island, then I think we are generally in support of that. Council Chair Rapozo: That is why it is in a separate paragraph. If we wanted it together we would put it. It is just a. and b. and b. is specific to impacts in specific areas, not arrivals by airlines. Ms. Walton: Can I make a comment on that? Council Chair Rapozo: He is the Chair. Committee Chair Chock: Go ahead. Ms. Walton: I just want to say that for all practical purposes, if you are putting it on a place, it has to be a place where there is one point of access to that area so that you can control the number of people. For place-based management, it is a legal tool that you can use. We cannot control the number of people coming in by airlines, but in a State park, you can control the number of people. But you have to have a discreet point of entry so that you can control those numbers. If people can come in from all directions, then you cannot control it. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Ms. Walton: You have to think about that when choosing the places. SPECIAL PLANNING 48 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: For the Planning Department, would you not agree that we do have the tools to control the number of vacation rentals, as well as the number of hotel rooms on this island? Ms. Dahilig: Absolutely. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Would you not agree that that is the primary point of control anyway? Most people will not come to the island without some reservations for a place to stay. In fact, sometimes, they will rearrange their trips, like they do at Haleakala, for example. They just get camping permits for another time when there are fewer demand for it. If you set a limit as to how many hotels and any kind of vacation rental units, whether it is the conventional ones, part of the resort, or individual Transient Vacation Rentals (TVRs), that is a tool for limiting visitor numbers on the island. Mr. Dahilig: The phrase "primary tool" for "throttling" tourists to the island is premised upon unit availability, so I would concur with that statement and if that was a question. Councilmember Yukimura: It was. Mr. Dahilig: For the rest of it, sorry, I do not follow. All I can say is that this is meant for land use, it is a land use plan and that unit counts, when it comes to transient units, is the primary throttle. Councilmember Yukimura: Therefore, if we determine carrying capacity, we could use that land use tool to determine how many visitors we have on this island, because as I pointed out, controlling the airport gets to be a gnarly thing if you have visitor units to fill, right? As to Councilmember Kawakami's point about the negative impacts of negative growth, it sounds to me like the limits of acceptable change are starting from where you are, which I think all of us feel if we could just stay where we are, we could probably manage pretty well. We have thriving visitor arrivals and a really good relationship between visitors and the community, generally speaking. I think the concern is that we go over and above where we are at now. To me, limits of change—this is the question, Anne—limits of change could be used for us now to determine whether and how much more growth this island can handle. It is not talking about going back in other words. Ms. Walton: No, you have to start from where you are right now, you establish a baseline of the quality of something. Councilmember Yukimura: Right, of where you are. Ms. Walton: Quality of life or just your experience, and then how you maintain that quality of whatever it is that you are concerned about where there are impacts from visitors. SPECIAL PLANNING 49 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: So baseline is a really good thing, because in science, you are asking what the status quo is, what is the baseline? Ms. Walton: So you have to answer that question first, not only in terms of you have to have accurate numbers of visitors and you have to have accurate assessment of what is this baseline you want to maintain? Those two parameters then establish what it is you are trying to manage for. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, with our analogy of one point of entry, basically it is the airport right now. We do have the cruise ships, but I do not know in terms of long-term travelers. I guess we have to consider cruise ships, then the airport, and then we would go from there in terms of what the numbers are? The visitor industry is already monitoring that. They have tools for measuring that. Ms. Walton: They have tools for measuring the numbers, but do they have tools that they are using to measure the impacts? That is the question. Councilmember Yukimura: So the impacts would be what we would have to develop? Ms. Walton: Yes. This is a shift in our thinking and this is a move towards addressing the impacts from visitors. I think unquestionably that is what we heard from everybody; are we willing to make the bold move or not? In fact, this is not rocket science and this is not something new. It is doing what is being done already in many places around the world, very successfully. I understand the access issue, and you know as Mike says, we cannot control people's travel legally, but we can put controls in another way, so what are we willing to do? Councilmember Kaneshiro: I have a comment. Again, as we look at this General Plan, I know we kept going from the "forty thousand foot view" to "ground level" and back and forth, and I think we are getting into trying to figure out details for this General Plan when I think when I look at it, you explore the development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity and you are looking at limits of acceptable change and other metrics and something else that is determined. From that, there may come a comprehensive incentive and disincentive plan. For me, to bring it back up to outer space where we are looking at the whole General Plan, I am okay with the language that is in it now. I do not need to know where we are going to put these visitor counts on the island or anything like that. I think we get so far into the details and we spend so much time on it when I do not think...we are not going to put the entire policy of how we count people into the General Plan. That is just my comment. Committee Chair Chock: I am not sure if there was any real middle ground here on language and I just want to make sure that we are clear about that, because I would like to take this vote on this section here. Mr. Dahilig: We would stand by the language we proposed. SPECIAL PLANNING 50 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Good. If there are no further questions, I would like to take the vote on this section if possible. Councilmember Yukimura: I think Anne had one last thing to say. Ms. Walton: I just want to say that I cautioned using carrying capacity alone, carrying capacity in reference to what? Because that has been done in the past. That is an old model. Just using carrying capacity and limiting the number of people, but for what? What are you achieving? So the limits of acceptable change give you a benchmark, so it is not arbitrary. Councilmember Yukimura: So you are saying that the wording as-is is what you feel would be... Ms. Walton: I actually could...something Mike suggested, but he does not want to go with now, is "establish the carrying capacity for various sites around the island." I think that might be a good starter point. I am not speaking for Mike, I am speaking for myself right now. Councilmember Kawakami: What about "exploring the development of a maximum annual carrying capacity" with everything else? Are we just wordsmithing? I am really trying to get to a place where we can meet each other halfway. It does not have to be either this one or that one. If there is some way where we can find out that it holds the essence of what you are trying to explain to us and also how to fit the mode of this General Plan. It does not have to be option A or option B. We can work on things on the fly, but it takes work. We understand the importance of knowing this capacity and also identifying areas around the island, Ke`e for one. We can handle it like Hanauma Bay. Committee Chair Chock: These are amendments. I want to start there in terms of... Council Chair Rapozo: I am fine with exploring the development of carrying capacity for the island. I have no problem changing"establish" to "explore." If we are just going to split hairs, then this is going to be a long process. I am not sure what the rub is. If you folks want to explore it, I do not have a problem with that. I have absolutely no problem with changing"establish" to "exploring." Committee Chair Chock: Mike? Yes? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Are you sure? Mr. Dahilig: If that is what we are looking at... Council Chair Rapozo: If that was the hang up. SPECIAL PLANNING 51 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: The existing language right now in the text is "explore." I would like to hear what Anne has to say about the "establish" and "explore." Council Chair Rapozo: Oh my goodness. Committee Chair, we have heard from Anne and we have heard from Planning. I will go ahead and make that friendly amendment to my amendment, if there is no objection. Council Chair Rapozo moved to change "establish" to"explore the development the carrying capacity for the island and various sites around the island," seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Yukimura: And continue and implement a monitoring system? Council Chair Rapozo: I made my amendment. Councilmember Yukimura: I am trying to clarify what that amendment is. Can you just read the whole amendment and say where the period is? Council Chair Rapozo: "Explore the development of the carrying capacity for the island and various sites around the island." That was what I thought I heard. Councilmember Kawakami: No, but they had an issue with the word "for the island." They just wanted "various sites" because... Council Chair Rapozo: Okay, "various sites." Committee Chair Chock: Those were the two pieces. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. That works for me. Council Chair Rapozo moved to remove "the island and" from the friendly amendment, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Yukimura: So just to clarify, "explore development of the carrying capacity for various sites around the island." Councilmember Kagawa: No, take out "around the island." Councilmember Kawakami: I am going to write it down. Councilmember Yukimura: "Various sites"... Committee Chair Chock: "For the island" before the "and" is where is the issue. Councilmember Yukimura: You read it, Chair. SPECIAL PLANNING 52 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Okay. "Explore the carrying capacity for various sites around the island." Council Chair Rapozo: "Explore the development of..." Committee Chair Chock: I am sorry, "the development of the carrying capacity for the various sites around the island and implement a monitoring system" and so on and so forth. Is that correct? Council Chair Rapozo: That is correct. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, we are in consensus here on this. Councilmember Yukimura: Ending with "metric." Councilmember Kawakami: Wait, we cannot use the word "implement" because that is prescriptive. So it has to be "consider" I think. That is an issue. This is where I was saying that people are going to read this document and they are going to say, "Look, it says `implement."' Am I right or am I wrong? Councilmember Yukimura: It says "implement" all over this plan. Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Kawakami: You want the language ambiguous. Mr. Dahilig: We want it flexible because it is in the plan section of this area that is meant to be guiding and not prescriptive. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. We are there. Councilmember Yukimura: How is it reading? Committee Chair Chock: Oh my goodness. Councilmember Kawakami: Let me try. Committee Chair Chock: I can do it. "Explore the development of the carrying capacity for various sites around the island and implement a monitoring system that tracks visitor impacts within the context of limits of acceptable change or other metric." Council Chair Rapozo: I hate to do this, but you just said "implement." Committee Chair Chock: Did I say "implement"? Council Chair Rapozo: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 53 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Oh my goodness. I put it in the wrong spot. I circled the wrong spot. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I read it? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: "Explore the development of the carrying capacity for various sites around the island and a monitoring system that tracks visitor impacts within the context of`limits of acceptable change' or other metric." So you are exploring both the carrying capacity and the monitoring system. Is that accurate to what you want? Committee Chair Chock: I believe that is what we can all agree on. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I just want to be clear about what is on the table. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I will not be voting for this amendment. If we are going to go through and wordsmith whether we should be using "explore" versus "establish" versus "implement" then we are going to be here all day. For me, I said it in the beginning, it says "explore development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity" and I am completely comfortable with that. Obviously, we are concerned about our visitor carrying capacity and we want to explore the numbers and how it affects the island. If we are going to go though and wordsmith every single thing, then we are going to be here for a while. I am just setting that straight. I know we have kind of come to an agreement on it, but I really do not think it makes that much of a difference. In general, we understand that there is a concern about our carrying capacity and we should explore the development of what that number is, and that is what it says currently in the plan and I am comfortable with that. Committee Chair Chock: We understand where your stance is and apparently everyone else at the table...well, the majority of other people around here really care about the details of it. I will leave that up to whoever is amending these sections and if it happens that way, that is how it is going to go. Let us move through it as quickly as possible. I think we have a motion. Council Chair Rapozo: Was it finally made and seconded? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Let us take a vote on this section, #15 and#16 in seriatim. SPECIAL PLANNING 54 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kaneshiro: Do we have to vote on that change first? Council Chair Rapozo: It was a friendly amendment. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay. Erase my comment about voting on that friendly amendment. Council Chair Rapozo: Just do #15. If you can do #15. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I would like to explain why. Again, looking at this, I see that we have added information that shortens the time period of the visitor count, and for me, I would rather have it longer, the graph has it over a ten-year period. I think you look at it like you look at if you have stocks or if you have something else. You can stress about it on the day-to-day ups and downs, but the longer you look at it, you get a better understanding of what the performance is. Our economy is doing good and I bet growth is unbelievable right now, but if something happens to the economy, it is going to drop again. You can see in the graph over ten (10) years that it has gone up and gone down and gone up. For me, I would rather keep it at the ten-year and look at it more like how you look at how your stock portfolio has gone or anything else. You look at the longer period and you see the trend. That is my only reason for voting no on this. I just wanted to clear that up and have everybody understand my position on it, from changing the growth over the time period from ten (10) years to five (5) years. Committee Chair Chock: Any other discussion on this amendment item #16? The motion to approve Item #16 of Amendment #5 was then put, and carried by a vote of 5:2:0 (Councilmember Kagawa and Councilmember Kaneshiro voting no). Committee Chair Chock: Okay. 5:2, motion passes. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. We did the "Economy — Tourism" section. Council Chair Rapozo: Committee Chair? Committee Chair Chock: Yes? (Councilmember Kagawa was noted as not present.) Council Chair Rapozo: We have ten (10) more minutes before the lunch break. I am going to ask that if we have "Energy Sustainability," which #17, the Planning Department has to no position, #18 and #19, they support, #20, they have no position. I do not envision too much problems there. I do not want to go through this exercise of splitting hairs. If there is a concern, for "Critical SPECIAL PLANNING 55 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Infrastructure," #21, the Planning Department does not support, #24 and #25, they do not support. It is the position of this body that if the Planning Department does not support it then...I will just withdraw. I do not want to waste people's time. We have discussed this and I just do not want to waste time. Committee Chair Chock: Here is what I would suggest—when we actually vet the ones that they do not support, they are kind of small details or reasons behind them. So at this point, just in regards to the ones that say "Do Not Support," we do not have to go through this one, we can go on to the ones that are all supported so that we can get through some and other packages are well-supported. In fact, I think all of the rest may be well-supported. If the discrepancy is small, then they might look at it and work on that so that we can at least come back to the table to look at something else. If not, then we will do exactly what Council Chair is suggesting, which he will withdraw it. Council Chair Rapozo: While we do have time, for Energy Sustainability, aside from#17,which they have no position, and#20, it is pretty much verbiage and not substantive. I think some are substantive, but they have garnered the support of the Planning Department. If we can dispose of Energy Sustainability, I would ask that we take the vote on that, unless some Members have some difficulty with individual items, then we can do it in seriatim. Committee Chair Chock: What I will do is in regards to #17 through #20, are there any points of discussion? Councilmember Kaneshiro: I looked through all of these and I wrote down comments on either one, whether Planning supported or not supported and any questions I had, I wrote them down. So even if Planning supported some, I still had questions on it. Again, with the limited time, if Planning supports it, then I will support it. If they do not support it, then I will not support it. I have questions on all of them. Committee Chair Chock: That just means that we should go through them, which is fine. Councilmember Kawakami: I would agree, because I do not think the last exercise was wordsmithing, because we were actually able to get that language in the, intent in making some big changes. It was not wordsmithing. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Can you review the ones that are in not support and get back to us on those? It is just so that we know ahead of time, instead of going back and forth. Go ahead. Councilmember Kawakami: The question pertaining to Energy Sustainability, I want to know if you are able to at least work with KIUC on some of these changes to see if you could get prior concurrence before just supporting it, because they are a big part of the discussion for Energy Sustainability. I know that these amendments are coming on the fly, but as you are putting your support behind SPECIAL PLANNING 56 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING them, for me, in this sector, I would like to see some kind of prior concurrence from our electric utility. Mr. Dahilig: For the record, Mike Dahilig, Director of Planning and the proud Director of the folks that just won the "Holly Jolly" competition across the street... Committee Chair Chock: Multitaskers. Councilmember Yukimura: Congratulations. Mr. Dahilig: I will say that the way that these amendments have been coming to us have been on the fly and we have tried to, in effect, provide as succinct of responses we could, but for a lot of these things, there is a lot of depth behind some of these responses. In discussing with Council Services Staff, whether or not it was appropriate for us to try to provide an explanation in writing or not, this method of just flagging one way or the other was what we felt was the most efficient way to provide these quick turnarounds, but they are very complex responses. So at least to those things that we do not support or we can try to, either in writing or in a conversation offline, explain what may be the hang-up that tilted it one way or the other. Again, reasonable minds can differ on the language, so we just wanted to explain what thought process we did in terms of how we were flagging things from the response standpoint. We tried as much as possible to go to our partner agencies to get their feedback within the quick turnaround time. For instance, I am not sure if we had the chance to take this to KIUC or not. They are sitting in the audience, so we can probably ask them offline with some of these if that is a concern. That is my response. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: In asking them to come back, are you asking them to come back after lunch? Committee Chair Chock: Planning? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: My expectation is that they would be. Councilmember Yukimura: I just wanted to be clear about the timetable. Committee Chair Chock: We have four (4) more packages to go through. Council Chair Rapozo: We have four (4) minutes. If you allow me, I will go through Energy Sustainability because it is very simple. For #17, changing "self-sufficiency" to "sustainability." For #18, basically expand "to save energy," to include "for energy sustainability, including but not limited to: solar hot water capacity and property insulation." Letter b. "pursue green energy conservation, including but not limited to: groundskeeping and farming equipment/machinery." SPECIAL PLANNING 57 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Initially, I thought that was kind of awkward, but yet, that is reasonable. To start looking at getting away from gas engines and going to electric. Again, this is all County equipment. "Installing more, and regularly maintaining and repairing, electric vehicle charging stations"—I think we just talked about that during the discussion a week or so ago. "Introducing residential and commercial incentives to transition to electric groundskeeping and farming equipment/machinery," and "County transition from fuel-powered to electric vehicles, machinery, and equipment, where feasible." Again, just playing with words. "Conduct regular reviews of County operations to identify ways to conserve energy..." #19, "expand strategies and mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on Kaua`i." #20, adding in the language "and support electric groundskeeping and farming equipment/machinery." Some machinery we will not get away from gas, like the big tractors and things like that. There are many opportunities to get away from fossil fuels. #20.b.1. "Establish capture and containment of methane at all landfills and County waste facilities"—I think that is already something that we are in the process of doing. On page 14, "Adopt a county-wide zero-waste strategy, including but not limited to: recycling pick- up at households and public locations and events, and building and maintaining a materials recovery facility with staff assigned to locate markets for recycled material." We already have a resolution that we have adopted for zero waste, so not a huge departure from what we are doing right now. Finally, amending page 186, changing "building energy performance information" to "information about buildings that are energy-sufficient (e.g., with solar hot water, green building designs and materials, and KIUC's household energy audit) around the island for both the residential and commercial sectors." I do not think it is that much of a change, just more of clarifying and expanding some of the examples of what we can do as a County. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: The language that I read through that was probably the most sticking was regarding support for "electrical groundskeeping and farming equipment/machinery," because I think that pertains to the entire island. I do not know how somebody is going to be able to mow a yard with an electric mower or anything like that. I do not want to have to start requiring farmers to use electric machinery; I do not know what type of electric machinery is in there. That was my biggest sticking point, just how far we are going with this and that type of language. That was my main sticking point when I was reading through some of these. Committee Chair Chock: Any others? Councilmember Yukimura: The Chair said that this applies only to the County, but amendment Item #18 applies islandwide, right? I just want that clarification. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. We already have the motion to take this in seriatim; are we ready to do that before lunch? Council Chair Rapozo: Whatever we can get done before lunch, I would suggest we do. SPECIAL PLANNING 58 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Okay. I am going to go down the line. I think we have one (1) more minute here. Council Chair Rapozo: Is there a request to do it individually or as a package? Committee Chair Chock: That is a good question. If there is no objection of doing it as a package, that means#17 through... Councilmember Kaneshiro: I guess the other one I had a problem with was "establish capture and containment of methane at all landfills and County waste facilities," but I do not know if other County waste facilities even have a methane there? Council Chair Rapozo: Again, we have to remember that this is a twenty-year plan and this is going forward. Obviously, right now, there is only one (1) place we can collect methane gas today, which is at the landfill. But ten (10) years from now, we are going to have another landfill, or hopefully sooner. It is really whatever facilities that methane is available, we should be capturing. I do not think we really have a choice anyway, but it is just really defining what we want to see in this plan and it is not a plan for this term of Council; it is the term for the next twenty (20) years. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I just want to say that in Item#20.b.2., which is "adopt a county-wide zero-waste strategy, including but not limited to: recycling pick-up at households and public locations and events, and building and maintaining a materials recovery facility with staff assigned to locate markets for recycled material," this is totally redundant. We adopted that in the last twenty-year plan, I believe. It is in our Solid Waste Management Plan, but consistently, the County Council has refused to fund the steps toward a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). It is sort of an empty amendment. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. I will let us vote in seriatim and go down the list. If Councilmember Yukimura wants it out, I will support taking it out. Councilmember Kaneshiro: For me, I would not be supporting #20 because it has the farming and groundskeeping information in it, but I support the other language in it, so not to confuse anything. It is probably going to pass anyways. Committee Chair Chock: Sure. The motion to approve Item #17 of Amendment #5 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Roll call on Item #18. SPECIAL PLANNING 59 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING The motion to approve Item #18 of Amendment #5 was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#18: Brun, Chock, Kagawa, Kawakami, Rapozo, Yukimura TOTAL— 6*, AGAINST ITEM#18: Kaneshiro TOTAL— 1, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kagawa was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #19 of Amendment #5 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Again, my vote on this is I do not want it to go out...including here about farming and groundskeeping, I do not want it to go out to the public that we are going to start requiring everybody to use electric vehicles on farms or in their yard or in grounsdkeeping. That is the only reason for my"no" vote. I am not sure why it is in there. We can have incentives for people to move to it, but I am not sure why we specify farming and groundskeeping. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Any last comments? If not, let us do a roll call on this one. The motion to approve Item #20 of Amendment #5 was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#20: Chock, Kagawa, Rapozo, Yukimura TOTAL— 4*, AGAINST ITEM#20: Brun, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL— 3, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kagawa was noted as silent (not present) and Councilmember Yukimura was noted as silent, but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are going to lunch and will be back at 1:30 p.m. There being no objections, the meeting recessed at 12:35 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 1:37 p.m., and proceeded as follows: SPECIAL PLANNING 60 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING (Councilmember Brun was noted as not present.) (Councilmember Kagawa was noted as present.) Committee Chair Chock: Welcome back from lunch. We are going to begin this meeting. We are on "Critical Infrastructure" from Amendment #5 by Council Chair Rapozo. Did you have a chance to review? Council Chair Rapozo: I am assuming that no one is going to oppose the friendly amendment that will change the language that has been reviewed by Planning and recommended by Planning. I do not have a problem with it. Item#21, if you look at the shaded area, it would remove the word"sustainability" and changing the words "based on" on the second line of the shaded area to "integrate." It would read "To ensure water domestic needs and protect the public for Kaua`i's water needs under the Public Trust Doctrine and integrate traditional ahupua'a methods of preserving water for future generations..." I actually like the word"integrate" better. That would be the changes of#21. For#24, their concerns... Committee Chair Chock: Do you see that paper right there? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Those are the suggestions by Planning. Sorry about that. Council Chair Rapozo: Item #24, concerns about "with the goal of eliminating ineffective water body quality standards" due to this evaluation falling under the State Department of Health responsibility so that phrase would be removed, so it would end...the period would go right after "pollutants." On #25, concerns about "prevents environmental degradation." Those standards are set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Health (DOH) so that would be removed as well. So it would say, "Manage wastewater treatment and disposal in a manner that safeguards human health while accommodating current needs of local residents before any consideration of future growth." I would make those amendments. Council Chair Rapozo moved to amend Items #21, #24 and #25 to reflect the above-referenced word changes, seconded by Councilmember Yukimura. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion before we take these amendments? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Does this integrate your amendments that are forthcoming here? Committee Chair Chock: No, mine were around the watersheds, so we are going to have to go back to that right after this, then we can make a decision on SPECIAL PLANNING 61 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING deferring it or receiving it. Any further discussion on the Critical Infrastructure section? Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Critical Infrastructure has others and the other one have no position on them? Council Chair Rapozo: Correct. Those three (3) amendments were made at the request of Planning and would get their support of those amendments. Committee Chair Chock: Any further questions? The question right now is on the items that the Planning Department is taking no position on, which is #22, #26, and#27. Council Chair Rapozo: Committee Chair, I will just call for the question, going down from #21 on down. If anyone has any questions, we can take it... Committee Chair Chock: We already have a motion for taking this in seriatim. The motion to approve Item#21, as amended, of Amendment#5 was then put, and carried by a vote of 5*:2:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Brun was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Kagawa and Councilmember Kaneshiro voting no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #22 of Amendment #5 was then put, and carried by a vote of 4*:3:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Brun was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Kagawa, Councilmember Kaneshiro, and Councilmember Kawakami voting no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. For Item#23... Councilmember Kagawa: Wait, so if a Member is not present, it passes? Committee Chair Chock: Yes, it is a silent vote that goes with the motion. This happened to us when you were gone earlier. Councilmember Kagawa: You are welcome. Committee Chair Chock: We are on#23. SPECIAL PLANNING 62 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING The motion to approve Item #23 of Amendment #5 was then put, and unanimously carried* (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b)of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Brun was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. This was amended by the Planning Department, #24. The motion to approve Item#24, as amended, of Amendment#5 was then put, and unanimously carried* (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Brun was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item#25, as amended, of Amendment#5 was then put, and unanimously carried* (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Brun was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.). Committee Chair Chock: We are on#26, "reduce solid waste stream by 70 percent." There is no position on this one. The motion to approve Item #26 of Amendment #5 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6*:1:0(*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b)of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Brun was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Kagawa voting no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. For #27, again, there is no position on this item here. (Councilmember Brun was noted as present.) Council Chair Rapozo: We are on#28 now, right? Committee Chair Chock: No, we are on#27. Council Chair Rapozo: Yes, I am sorry. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: We are removing the timeframe, right? We are saying seventy percent (70%) diversion, but we are removing the "2023" timeframe. Council Chair Rapozo: Correct. Councilmember Yukimura: I cannot vote for that. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. SPECIAL PLANNING 63 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: What is the rationale? Council Chair Rapozo: Because we are not getting to seventy percent (70%) by 2023. Councilmember Yukimura: But you do not set your goals by what you think you can get to; you set it by what you want to get to. Council Chair Rapozo: I want a Mercedes for Christmas, but it is not going to happen, so I am not putting it on my goal sheet. I am just saying that again it is what it is. We support it or we do not. I am not going to get into a debate of why. It is what it is. You either support it or you do not. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Anything else before we take the vote? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. I think this is the time for debate just before we vote. A goal without a timeframe is sort of meaningless, because it can mean seventy percent (70%) of solid waste by 3031...the urgency of doing diversion is so that we can extend the life of the landfill and we can move more expeditiously to a sustainable solid waste system. To remove it is to say that it is not that important. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any other discussion on this? Let us do a roll call on this one. The motion to approve Item #27 of Amendment #5 was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#27: Chock, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami, Rapozo TOTAL — 5, AGAINST ITEM#27: Brun, Yukimura TOTAL — 2, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are on #28. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I just wanted to double-check with Planning on this one, because it says that we are going to keep visitor arrivals at reasonable levels. I do not know how we do that. I guess my question was why did they support it with that kind of language? Committee Chair Chock: Mike, can you come up? We have a question on this item. I am surprised that you support "reasonable." Just kidding. Councilmember Kaneshiro: We are talking about "to ensure airport and harbor improvements are in balance with the need to manage tourism impacts and keep visitor arrivals at reasonable rates." What is reasonable rates? If it is not, what SPECIAL PLANNING 64 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING are we going to do? Stop the airports? We do not have that authority. I just want clarification. It is changing from "to support the modernization and user-friendliness of Kaua`i's airports and harbors." It is just a real general thing. Mr. Dahilig: Councilmember, I believe that we are very cognizant of the fact that it is been discussed earlier that the airport is a key throttle with respect to how many visitors come to the island. So in recognition of that, we are in agreement with the language that characterizes that need to balance that expansion of these airport facilities and harbor facilities while keeping in mind that when you do such a thing, you are, by consequence, potentially opening up more and more tourists to come to the island. That is what we are saying. We are not giving a disposition as to what is or is not a reasonable level. What we are more focused on is that phrase "balanced" to recognize that when you do expand an airport, if there is a gate opening or if there is a gate slot, an airplane from afar can come in and bring more tourists. That is all it is. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any further questions before we take this vote? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: They are in balance with the need to manage tourism impacts; so where do they get the cue from what the right balance is? Mr. Dahilig: That is where I think when we are looking at the need to...we talked about this earlier...not to open up another amendment, but I think it was the discussion...as was whispered behind my ear, carrying capacity and the need to study these things. We are looking at benchmarks that we have to understand where we are and what levels are impacting our island. We hear Sue Kanoho say every time that when you start to get to the twenty-eight (28) through thirty (30) range, you can feel something different on the island. That is what we are hearing, even from our own visitor agency, that once you start getting to those levels, you feel more traffic and cars. To quantify it again, I think we are just trying to recognize that statement that has been said over and over again that the airport plays a crucial role as to how many tourists come to the island. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I am going support the original language for a few reasons. I hope people can understand that. I do totally agree that our airports need to be in balance with the impacts that tourism brings, but no matter what, it is not the airport, but the Department of Transportation, because here in itself lies the conflict that because the Department of Transportation is self-funded, they are reliant on all of these gate fees and landing fees that they collect. So if an airline wants to come in, they are just going to say, "Yes, come in," because that is increased revenue. Some of these modernizations and improvements are not because we want to bring in more airplanes. Let me remind you that for some of our airports, we are mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to extend our runways to be able to have flights even come in. I am going to support the original language just because I think it is in-line. The other thing to keep in consideration is that the State's modernization plan has some innovative ways for the SPECIAL PLANNING 65 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Department of Transportation to actually reclaim storm water in the form of water scalping. Money has been appropriated for the Department of Transportation specifically for airport modernization to start pilot programming this water scalping technology to kind of reclaim gray water at a large commercial scale. As much as I understand, I would like to say that some of these extensions and expansions of runways are just because the FAA has been mandating it. So I do not know what kind of language this would do to hinder us being in compliance with being able to take off from Lihu`e Airport. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Any further questions for Planning? Any further discussion on this amendment? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I agree with Councilmember Kawakami that airport and harbor improvements are not necessarily only related to managing growth. There are things like making it more energy-efficient and stuff like that that count as improvements. I also, as I have stated before, think that the real throttle or the real control is how many visitor units we allow on this island, because once you have those visitor units, the pressure to bring in more tourists is just really hard to stop because you are talking about employees getting enough time and all of that. It is just set up. So the real throttle is controlling visitor units on this island. If we are talking about a set, like right now, we are talking about a set inventory of visitor units without any more growth. I agree then it is crazy to bring in more than we can handle, so I believe there is a rule for asking for controls at the airport, but the real solution is controlling visitor units. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Further discussion before we take the vote? Roll call on this item, please. The motion to approve Item #28 of Amendment #5 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM#28: Chock, Rapozo, Yukimura TOTAL— 3*, AGAINST ITEM#28: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL— 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Yukimura was noted as silent, but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. That was the last of package Amendment#5. We have to dispose of#12 to#14, which is the Watershed portion. I will entertain a motion to defer or receive whatever is the interest of the body. Council Chair Rapozo moved to receive#12,#13, and#14 of Amendment#5 for the record, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa, and unanimously carried. (Councilmember Kawakami was noted as not present.) SPECIAL PLANNING 66 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: Just for your information, Amendment#6 will be withdrawn. Committee Chair Chock: This is the Affordable Housing. I think the request is to continue to work on this to get more clarity on it. Any further discussion? If not, we are going to move onto Amendment#7. This is Councilmember Yukimura's. Councilmember Yukimura moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 7, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. This is the one on the boundary lines. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. I think there has been considerable discussion on this. This is about restoring the boundary between the Hanapepe--`Ele`ele District and South Kauai District as it existed in the 2000 General Plan. As Susan Remauldo testified at the public hearing, as did Jean Souza, this is much more aligned with where the communities traditionally have been in terms of district. It is really a better reflection of the communities. That is what this amendment would do. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion? Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: I told some of the Waimea, `Ele`ele, and Hanapepe residents that had requested that that I would support this, only because as long as I have known, that whole McBryde area has always been part of the west side, although it is close to Kalaheo. That has always been the boundary as far as the plantations being there and those kids would go to `Ele`ele that would be in the McBryde area, they would go to `Ele`ele Elementary School and not Kalaheo Elementary School. I just thought that it falls in line with how west side was always set up from the past and I think we need to stick to the past until we know that it is better to change the past practice for our benefit. I do not see that benefit, so I just want to stick to the past as the west side residents wish. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Any further discussion on this item? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. What Councilmember Kagawa said about how from Numila on, they have been connected to `Ele`ele-Hanapepe is historically true. Even when the Buddhist church moved from the plantation site, they moved to Hanapepe and kids went to `Ele`ele Elementary School. The groups and the social organizations are all based on that division, so it makes much more sense. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: If there is no further discussion, let us take a roll call on this item as well. SPECIAL PLANNING 67 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING The motion to approve Amendment #7 was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#28: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami, Rapozo, Yukimura, Chock TOTAL — 7*, AGAINST ITEM#28: None TOTAL — 0, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Council Chair Rapozo: You folks all deserve a hand for that one. Committee Chair Chock: We are on the last package, #9. Sorry, we are on Amendment#8. I am getting anxious. Councilmember Yukimura moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 8, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: These are amendments that arose out of the discussions that we had on various sectors of the General Plan, and thanks to our staff, Jenelle, they were captured and sent to Planning to ask Planning for their position. You will see that there is concurrence on everything, except #21. I think there is nonsupport, and then also in #10, there is no position because Planning considers that a policy decision that the Council should make. We can go over it one-by-one if people want to. Committee Chair Chock: Any questions, Members? Councilmember Yukimura: Let me just say, too, that#2 and#4 are follow- ups to our decision to remove the resort designation at Princeville. They are textual changes and they just align the text with our decision to change the map. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any other questions about the amendments? Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I have a question on #3 and it might be for Planning or the introducer, but it says that "...the new growth will not sprawl onto agricultural lands or in a pattern that will make poor use of scarce resources," but I believe that in some areas, they have included some agricultural lands around town SPECIAL PLANNING 68 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING core areas. So is it the intent...and I want Planning's opinion on it, but I believe in the Lihu`e Plan that was passed, there was some agricultural lands that were included in this urban growth boundary. I just wanted to be clear, are we not going to have agricultural lands in the urban growth boundary anymore? Councilmember Yukimura: No, they are allowed to the extent that they are the only place for growth or they are a logical place for growth. They will not exceed the growth-levels we want in Lihu`e and the land use patterns are going to be efficient land use patterns. Committee Chair Chock: Can we get the Planning Department up here? Mr. Dahilig: We understand the desire to not encourage sprawl, but encourage infill and mixed-use. That is what this is. We do believe that we have sufficient information to actually...because of the build-out analysis that is appended to this plan to be able to conduct this type of analysis. When we are looking at the phrase "sprawl onto agricultural lands," what we are interpreting that to mean is that it is agriculturally-designated lands, so lands that in the plan are designated agriculture already. So there are areas that are right now designated for some type of urban expansion, but are on State Land Use agricultural lands. So what we are seeing by this phrase is that it is those that are designated agriculture in this plan. I hope that is as clear as mud. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Yes. When I read it, just in general, it says that we want to properly implement our urban growth boundaries, which I know is like we put a line around an area where into where it is going to grow, and it says, "but the new growth will not sprawl onto agricultural lands," which I believe like when you look at the Lihu`e Town Core, some did. I just want to be sure, is that the intent that we are not going to...when we start doing the Waimea projects and the community plans for the other areas, is this the policy that they are going to be following that? Is it just redundant to say that the plan does not have it so that is why we are putting it in? I was a little confused. Mr. Dahilig: We are just taking it at face value at this point from the proposal, so we interpret agricultural lands to be agriculturally-designated in this plan. Councilmember Yukimura: I think the definitive word is the word "sprawl." It is not absolutely no growth on agricultural land, but it is not growth that is going to be low-density sprawl far from the urban area. If there are agricultural areas along the edges of the urban area that are logical for growth, then it is okay. It is this idea of taking huge tracts of agricultural land and just adding them into the boundary. The Planning Department has to identify the process for creating the urban-edge boundary, so they will set up more specific criteria, but the goal is akin to what we say throughout the plan, that we want compact growth. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Again, I think when I hear "sprawl," I think anytime you go on to agricultural land then that is sprawl, but I think about the... SPECIAL PLANNING 69 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: That is not... Councilmember Kaneshiro: There is no definition of "sprawl" here, but anytime we go from residential to agricultural, that is sprawl. You are sprawling on... Councilmember Yukimura: No. Councilmember Kaneshiro: That is the way I am reading it. I think about the west side. I do not think the lands that we have designated for residential there is residential land-zoned already, so if we were to redraw the boundary, then we would be drawing the boundary on land that is agriculture that has sprawled. I understand what you are saying, but the way I read this, anything that goes onto agriculture. If you look at the west side development, it is next to a neighborhood and it makes sense that urban growth would growth there. The way it is written, it sounds like it cannot because you are sprawling onto agricultural land. Councilmember Yukimura: That is your definition or interpretation of sprawl. I just want to say that in using the word, that is not my intention or definition of sprawl. Sprawl is low-density over a large area. Compact is in a small area. That is the difference. (Councilmember Kawakami was noted as present.) Councilmember Kaneshiro: That is fine, but I will not vote for it. Ten (10) years from now, when somebody reads this and they see "sprawl," they may think like you or they may think like me and say, "No, sprawl means that it cannot extend further from the residential boundary line," and I think there are areas where we have seen in the plan that that is the case. We actually moved residential lots that were kind of scattered through agriculture and we consolidated it right next to a residential neighborhood, which makes sense, and for smart growth, the infrastructure is there. But if it says no sprawl, then that means...I do not know...to say, "The far ones are sprawl, but then the one that you put closer is not," for me, it is not clear. I can see someone saying in the future that we are not going to accept any development along residential areas because we said in our General Plan that "no new growth will not sprawl onto agricultural lands," is what the language says. Councilmember Yukimura: That is the concept of urban growth boundary that once you establish it, you do not have residential densities outside of the urban growth boundary. That is how you achieve compactness. The thing is that it does not stop growth, it is supposed to accommodate growth. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I am not arguing with you. I think we both agree that we want development to be close to where it is, but I am just saying that it makes it sound like you cannot go onto agricultural land. We are both in agreement that we both want to see communities that are closer to infrastructure. But when it comes to reading the language, I think we have a different view on it. We are talking about the same thing. SPECIAL PLANNING 70 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: What I am hearing is his comfort level on the verbiage and we have to respect how he is going to vote. Any more discussion on#3 before we move on? I want to make sure that we get some time. Mike, the one that you disagree with, for the record, #21... Councilmember Yukimura: Chair? Committee Chair Chock: Yes? Councilmember Yukimura: I can take out the words and just say, "desired by the community in a pattern that will make efficient use of scarce resources." Committee Chair Chock: Can you respond? Councilmember Kaneshiro: The sprawl is the one that throws me off. I would think it would throw other people off. When I think of sprawl, I think anything that is not on that area. "My paper will sprawl if I start writing off the paper." Councilmember Yukimura: Well, then you should take out the word "sprawl" wherever it is used in the plan, because it does not mean that. Councilmember Kaneshiro: No, we are talking about this amendment and it is specific to a designated line. Let us not get crazy on this. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Can we get back to#21, please? Mr. Dahilig: I think this was part of the overarching community concern that we heard through the process that with when entitlements are given out, there does not seem to be an end-date or completion-date for any of these projects to fulfill their promises to the community through that permitting process. So we tried to, as a means of balancing, keeping in certain designations, add this language as a way to create that balance. There were two (2) that were in play here: that was the one that was taken out by the Council up at Princeville and the other one that is in play is the one on Kikiaola, right next to the Waimea Plantation Cottages. It has been referred to a "use it or lose it" policy and we thought this was a way to create a compromise between those that want to have some finality or some certainty as to what is going to happen on the land, versus those that need the time to actually get the entitlements, because it does take a long time. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I agree with an effective lose it or use it policy, but the reason I am taking this out is because it does not attain that. I am more confident in the next amendment, which says "prevent developers from sitting on zoning permits and imposing short-term sunset clauses and zoning permits." If I can explain, I am starting on the wording of the provision that I am trying to remove, "Allow existing resort entitlements to build out"—that is already going to happen, right? If we do nothing, that is going to happen; they are going to build out. "require SPECIAL PLANNING 71 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING any non-entitled resort-designated areas in the General Plan"—so the only one remaining is the Waimea Plantation Cottages. Right now, it is proposed resort. That is the only one that would be affected by this right now or any other resort designations that we give, which are non-entitled. So they are on agricultural land. What it says is within ten (10) years, they have to attain full County zoning and resort-related approvals, it does not say "build." So what you are going to do is you are going to get them to the status of those three thousand seven (3,700) units that have permits, but it does not ensure that they are going to build out. All it is saying is that you have to get your full entitlements, so it is not really a "use it or lose it" provision. That is why it does not make sense. If you want something, which I presume, when we give them a general plan resort designation, we are saying that we want to see resort there in the next twenty (20) years. If you do not require them to build it in the next twenty (20) years then...and if you do not really want it, then do not even put it there in the first place. Basically, you are saying with resort general plan designations that are on agricultural lands, you have to go vest your rights in twenty (20) years, but it does not say "build." Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: #22 is better because it says "to prevent developers from sitting on zoning permits, impose short-term sunset clauses on zoning permits to ensure timely buildout." This is getting your zoning permit; it says, "If you do not build within three (3)to five (5)years, then you lose your zoning permit." Committee Chair Chock: Can#22 exist if#21 stays in? Councilmember Yukimura: Well, if you want someone to just get their entitlements in twenty (20) years and still be not built, yes, you can do that. That is basically what we had with Princeville Resort...well, excuse me, Princeville Resort Phase II was not even entitled, but you would be telling Princeville Resort that if we kept it in there, "Okay, Princeville Resort, you have twenty (20) years to vest your..." Council Chair Rapozo: Where are you getting twenty (20) years from? Councilmember Yukimura: That is the scope of the General Plan. Council Chair Rapozo: No, but this is saying that they get until 2027, ten (10) years. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, ten (10) years. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, it is a huge difference. Councilmember Yukimura: That is true. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any further questions on#21 or#22 as it relates? How does everyone feel about the rest of the amendments? Are there any objections to the rest of the amendments? SPECIAL PLANNING 72 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Brun: I have questions on#5, #6, and#7. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, let us take it one-by-one. Councilmember Brun: I do not know if we checked with Housing on this and I just want to, Mike, is this just your folks approval of it? I am trying to text Kanani on it. Mr. Dahilig: We tried to solicit feedback from Housing on this. In the mix of things, this is just our evaluation alone on this. I cannot confirm whether or not we got a clear answer from Housing on this or not. For us, in terms of#5, #6 and#7, it is really loose narrative and nothing that prompts an action. It is narrative language and nothing that we would say is necessary, but at the same time, if it was the call of the body to put it in, we would not jump up-and-down and say, "Oh, wait, Chair, wait." Committee Chair Chock: If you disagree with them, I am going to take it out and we are going to do it in seriatim. If you agree with them, then I am going to package them together. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I explain them? Committee Chair Chock: Sure. I just wanted to get a sense. Councilmember Brun: I do not want to put them all together because we have a couple other ones, too. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: For Item #5 and Item #6, they just clarify what is already being said. It is partly the history of housing on Kaua`i and Item #7 is basically an explanation of what our Housing Agency does and what their achievements have been. This is background information about Housing. In the text about Housing, it is not even a policy statement, it is just a clear...so that people, when they are reading about housing, understand the role of the agency. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Do you have further questions? Any questions on the rest of the package? Council Chair Rapozo: I just wanted to clarify#21. You said that#22 can exist with#21 being taken out? I take that back—Can#22 exist if#21 remains? That is the question. Mr. Dahilig: Actually, they are apples and oranges. Council Chair Rapozo: Okay, so it is okay? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 73 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Any further questions? I think the wish of the body is to take each one in seriatim, so that is what we will do. The motion to approve Item #1 of Amendment #8 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #2 of Amendment #8 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Yukimura: For #3, I want to propose, as we have incorporated "friendly amendments." Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Councilmember Yukimura: I will just remove the phrase "but the new growth will not sprawl on agricultural lands or," so that it will read, "In the process of identifying a boundary, the Planning Department shall conduct a build out analysis of the existing urban footprint and use the principles of smart growth to ensure that there is enough room within the boundary for growth desired by the community in a pattern that will make efficient use of scarce resources." Councilmember Yukimura moved to amend Item #3 to reflect said changes, seconded by Council Chair Rapozo. Committee Chair Chock: Great. Councilmember Yukimura: I am hopeful that this addresses Councilmember Kaneshiro's concerns. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I am more comfortable with that, so I will be voting for it. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. The motion to approve Item #3, as amended, of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 5:2:0 (Councilmember Brun and Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #4 of Amendment #8 was then put, and unanimously carried. SPECIAL PLANNING 74 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: I think Item #5 was in question. Let us do a roll call on that. Councilmember Yukimura: Can we have some discussion? Committee Chair Chock: I did call for discussion. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. The motion to approve Item #5 of Amendment #8 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM #5: Rapozo, Yukimura, Chock TOTAL — 3, AGAINST ITEM#5: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL — 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. We are on Item #6. Roll call on this one as well. The motion to approve Item #6 of Amendment #8 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM#6: Rapozo, Yukimura, Chock TOTAL — 3, AGAINST ITEM#6: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL — 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. Same thing for #7, roll call, please. The motion to approve Item #7 of Amendment #8 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM#7: Rapozo, Yukimura, Chock TOTAL— 3, AGAINST ITEM#7: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL— 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. The motion to approve Item#8 of Amendment#8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item#9 of Amendment#8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). SPECIAL PLANNING 75 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Yukimura: Can we discuss Item#10? Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Councilmember Yukimura: Item #10 is to "reduce Kaua`i's population of homeless persons by 75 percent of the 2017 level by 2035." Council Chair Rapozo: Actually, it is "houseless." Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, thank you. Basically, it just puts a number on the objective to reduce Kaua`i's population of houseless. That is what the existing text says and it sets a target for us. Without a target, it does not matter. You can reduce the population of houseless persons by two (2) and say you achieved your goal. I think we need a target that moves us to do something. Seventy-five percent (75%)—I know there are some people that want to be houseless. I do not know what that percentage is, that is why I did not set it at one hundred percent (100%) like some communities have. They have actually set up a goal to eliminate houselessness by a certain time period. So I thought it is reasonable to set a target and I hope people can agree with this. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: I can agree with putting a number in there, but there has to be a process to throwing a number out there. When we do strategic plans to achieve fifty percent (50%) renewable energy with KIUC, there is a process that goes as far as, "Okay, we are going to deploy so much photovoltaic with hydroelectric." I would like to know what the process was to get the seventy-five percent (75%) reduction. It is surely a number that I can support, but I have to be able to explain how we came up to the seventy-five percent (75%) and what the process was. Thank you, Chair. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I have said, as I studied the issue of other communities ending houselessness, I can see that it can be done with this Housing First policy and there are places, for example, in Texas and in Salt Lake, where they have actually ended, they call it "Homelessness of Veterans" and their next goal is to reduce the general population of homeless and some of them have targets of ending homelessness. I have not seen major statistics. We know there is point in count...I think there is like four hundred plus (400+) plus people on Kaua`i that are houseless and I think it is a reasonable expectation to try to reduce houseless by seventy-five percent (75%) in the next twenty (20) years. It is a reasonable goal and I believe in putting some measurable on it. Committee Chair Chock: Vice Chair Kagawa. SPECIAL PLANNING 76 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: We went pretty fast and on a lot of them, I was the sole "no" vote, but after seeing the amendment and just looking at the original, I just concur with what Planning had with that particular item, the existing language. I relate it to like you get a car that is working and you fool around with the car, not really knowing what you are doing, and you end up actually making the car worse. It is kind of where I am coming from with some of these hesitancies, when the language in there, that was not just thought of yesterday; they worked on it for a long time and it looks fine to me. I do not know why we are trying to fool around with all of these parts, not knowing what we are doing. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I would like to hear Planning's position. My understanding was that it was the Council's kuleana to set policy like this. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I think it says "No Position." Councilmember Yukimura: But they are neither against it nor for it. I believe it is not what Council Vice Chair thinks it is. Councilmember Kagawa: I was saying in general to a lot of my "no" votes that it is not to say that it is a bad amendment, it is not the criticize you or anybody voting "yes," it is just that as I read the original in that area, based on that particular amendment where it is pinpointed, I feel like the existing language is fine and I am entitled to feel that way. Councilmember Yukimura: Surely. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Any further discussion on Item #10? Roll call on this one. The motion to approve Item#10 of Amendment#8 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM#10: Rapozo, Yukimura, Chock TOTAL— 3, AGAINST ITEM#10: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami TOTAL— 4, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. The motion to approve Item #11 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #12 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). SPECIAL PLANNING 77 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Can we do a roll call for#13? The motion to approve Item#13 of Amendment#8 was then put, and failed by the following vote: FOR ITEM#13: Yukimura, Chock TOTAL— 2, AGAINST ITEM#13: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro, Kawakami, Rapozo TOTAL— 5, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL— 0. Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. The motion to approve Item #14 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 5:2:0 (Councilmember Brun and Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I explain this one? Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Councilmember Yukimura: All it is, is explaining the terms. It is like footnotes to the terms that are already in the Planning Commission Draft. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Referencing specific entities and websites that may not be around in a couple of years, to me, is not the right way to go. I cannot support the amendment utilizing websites that may not even be around. I think you can get your point across, but things change over twenty (20) years and I really do not like specific articles in there. Committee Chair Chock: Any other discussion regarding Item#15? The motion to approve Item #15 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 2:5:0 (Councilmember Brun, Councilmember Kagawa, Councilmember Kaneshiro, Councilmember Kawakami, and Council Chair Rapozo voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion fails. The motion to approve Item #16 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Yukimura: May I say something? SPECIAL PLANNING 78 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: For Item #17, all I am doing is moving this from an action item to the objective. It is already in the action item. That is where we are taking it away because it is not really an action. These are targets, so they make more sense as an objective, but they are already in the plan. Committee Chair Chock: Any other discussion? The motion to approve Item #17 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Yukimura: Can I explain Item#18? Committee Chair Chock: Yes, please. Councilmember Yukimura: So the Kapa'a Transportation Solutions contains all of the Department of Transportation improvements and all it is saying is let us integrate transit strategies with it, so include our Short-Range Transportation Plan, like the shuttle for Wailua-Kapa'a into the Kapa'a solutions framework. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Discussion? Councilmember Kagawa: For me, I feel that the current language is fine. I do not think that any Council will ignore the fact that Kapa'a's transportation needs work, daily, I would say, not only that you remember it is in the General Plan. It is a daily problem that needs to be fixed. I do not think a General Plan is going to tell us that we need to fix it soon because I think we know it. It is a problem and I do not think we need the General Plan to tell us that. I think the existing language is fine. Thank you, Chair. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Right now, I think it reads that we should implement the Kapa'a Transportation Solutions report, and all it is saying is integrate and coordinate transit strategies that are also in our Kaua`i Short-Range Transit Study. So I do not think it is doing what you think it is doing, Vice Chair. Councilmember Kagawa: I just think the existing language is fine. Committee Chair Chock: Any further discussion? The motion to approve Item #18 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. SPECIAL PLANNING 79 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: For Item #19, this is just reflecting the clarification that we got from the Planning Department. I asked them, "What do you mean by resort areas? Do you mean Visitor Destination Areas (VDA)?" They said, "Yes." That is what I wanted to clarify. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: How does this tie-in by adding in Waimea? Councilmember Yukimura: Because it has a visitor destination there. Councilmember Kawakami: But it says to revitalize rather than expand. What if they want to expand? This is provisional, right? Am I wrong? Councilmember Yukimura: No, they are going to be allowed to have resort, but they are not going to be allowed to have VDA because VDA allows transient vacation rentals. Councilmember Kawakami: I think that is a question for Planning. Councilmember Yukimura: Fine. Councilmember Kawakami: Please do not be upset because I have a question. Councilmember Yukimura: Oh. No... Councilmember Kawakami: I think it is a valid question and I am sorry if it offends you. Before I vote on this and because it has the Planning Department's support behind it and their stamp of approval, I would like clarification on how it impacts Waimea's provisional resort when you say that we are going to revitalize rather than to expand? They may have expansion plans. Councilmember Yukimura: I totally support your question and I am not questioning...I think it is a legitimate question. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Mike. Mr. Dahilig: The visitor destination area designation would, if inside or expanded, would allow additional transient vacation rentals. So what we are essentially saying is that we would concur that if the policy is to want to lock those in, it is consistent within other statements within the plan where we are calling for no expansion of the VDA. Councilmember Kawakami: So this is safe then? This would not impact...I guess the purpose of having the provisional out there is because it was so tied up that you wanted to have more discussion when they went back to finalize their community plan. So I just want to make sure that this does not eliminate that process to happen. SPECIAL PLANNING 80 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: Just to be clear, the consequence of this, if it does go forward in this matter, if the resort area was expanded from the current area right now...can I grab the book for a second? Councilmember Kawakami: Sure. Mr. Dahilig: If you turn to page 237, which is the Land Use Map, in our batch of amendments during the discussion, the Chair pointed out that half of the crosshatch area is actually in resort already, so it is only the provisional side that is more towards the Kekaha side of Waimea. Any expansion of that, if they wanted to move the VDA broader, could preclude resort uses related to transient vacation rentals, single-family transient vacation rentals, or timeshare usage. That is the consequence of this amendment. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: Besides what is existing for Waimea, like coming onboard, I think there is the one on Gay & Robinson property; so that is already VDA? Mr. Dahilig: I have to check the maps, but that one is already entitled for a certain type of usage. Councilmember Kagawa: So it does not impact...is there any more on the horizon that you foresee for Waimea that has been proposed? Mr. Dahilig: Other than the portion that is close to Kekaha. So that crosshatch area should only be about half of its crosshatch, closer to the Kekaha portion of that, makai of the highway. So it should be solid pink to the right, which is the current resort. But if they wanted to expand it further, the VDA line would not...if this was adopted, would not be consistent with that. The effect of that would be that hotel use could be allowed. It does not matter the form or the character, but the hotel use could be allowed. But anything that relates to single-family transient vacation rentals or timeshares would not be allowed as part of the rezoning change. Councilmember Kagawa: I am glad that Councilmember Kawakami asked that question, because for Waimea and Hanapepe, the VDA area has not been built out and I wanted to leave open the possibility at least for Waimea, Hanapepe, and Kekaha to have some if the community desires. As far as the overall amendment, I am going to support this one, Councilmember Yukimura. So I am not just "no" on everything. I think we have enough VDA...in fact, I think we have too much VDAs already as-is. Thank you, Chair. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: Just for my own clarification, we added in Waimea to this; have we heard from that west side community? I bring this up and I give them a little bit more purview, because if there is one thing that comes out of SPECIAL PLANNING 81 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING the west side community, it is a feeling that they have been left behind in the discussion oftentimes; and it is not to your fault. You folks went out there and you did the outreach, but they worked hard, they made a decision, and they support the plan when we talked to some of the west side members. I just want to make sure that by adding in Waimea that we are actually doing something that they have agreed to comply with. I just want to hear that and not lock them out. Because economy-wise, they have PMRF, they have agriculture, and they have very little options. When we look at economic development on the west side, visitor destination area is a key component to growth. Mr. Dahilig: I guess in response, if asked the question that way, we were simply reviewing it based on the text and for consistency with what is the islandwide policy. We know that there are VDA areas in Waimea. So that is all we were reviewing it from, but not taking into account whether or not there was further input from the west side whether this was appropriate. I will say that my feeling from the public process that we had out there was flexibility as much as possible is what was wanted because of the West Kauai Plan that has been appropriated and approved by this Council. Councilmember Kawakami: I would be okay with just taking out Waimea then, because the sentiment is very clear-cut with rest of the island. The north shore has been fed up with just the proliferation of the vacation rentals and changing their neighborhoods, for the majority. But it is that one section that is really hard to gage and I would not want to assume for them that just because the rest of the island feels a certain way that they are going to walk lockstep. I would be open to removing Waimea. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you. So with the new language, the proposed language you are saying is that we would restrict the expansion of VDA areas, but not resort areas? Mr. Dahilig: That is the way this reads. Council Chair Rapozo: Is the Planning Department okay with that? Mr. Dahilig: Yes, we are okay with it in terms of the way it is written now. I would say that if there is an issue with Item# 19, you may want to look at Item#20 for consistency purposes. In case there is a policy read from the way that the Council wants to go on it, I would suggest that both Item#19 and#20 do not contradict each other. Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: Mike, basically you are saying that resort and the provisional resort or Waimea Plantation Cottages' desire to expand will not be SPECIAL PLANNING 82 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING limited by this, but all it does is ensures that whatever units are built will be part of a resort rather than timeshare or individual vacation rentals, right? Mr. Dahilig: I guess it comes into the interpretation of what range of resort uses should be available for this discussion, and if the discussion going into the West Kaua`i Plan is taking timeshare and single-family transient vacation rentals off the table, that is how it would be done with this amendment. If that range of options would like to be put in for discussion for the West Kaua`i Plan, then this amendment would preclude that. So that is just the effect. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I guess I am confused now. So you are telling me that this does or does not hinder the west side's ability to do what they want when the West Kaua`i Plan comes up? Mr. Dahilig: If the idea is that the full range of resort usage options should be available to the west side for that discussion, then this will not achieve that. Councilmember Kaneshiro: So Waimea should be taken out? Mr. Dahilig: If that is what your desire is, that would be the net effect. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: It sounds like there is a friendly amendment. Council Chair Rapozo: I would definitely second Councilmember Kawakami's amendment to take Waimea out. Councilmember Yukimura: I will accept it as a friendly amendment. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. The motion to approve Item#19 of Amendment#8, as amended, was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: We are going to have to address Item #20 as well. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I guess the sentiment was that if we voted for one, is it still consistent if we voted for this next one? It is like we are...it is hard because we are needling through this thing and it is hard to see how it affects everything else. From your standpoint, with the last one passing, do you still support Item#20 as it is amended? SPECIAL PLANNING 83 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: It would be a conflict with Item#19. So given what the action of the Council would be, I guess we would change our position to remove the contradiction. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: So would you be amenable to "Do not expand existing VDA boundaries, except in Waimea"? Mr. Dahilig: The reality with this is that if you put the phrase "except in Waimea," VDA can overlay residential. Councilmember Yukimura: VDA can what? Mr. Dahilig: VDA technically could overlay residential. We would suggest the present language, because if the idea is to provide the range of options for resort-designated areas, this is the only resort-designated area left that has not reached full entitlement based on our earlier discussion of standards. This would not, in effect, only apply to Waimea by default if you leave that language beyond resort-designated areas in there. Councilmember Yukimura: That is why you make Waimea the exception, then you could apply "not expanding VDAs to other areas." Mr. Dahilig: Again, reading the current map as it stands with all of the amendments right now and this language together, the only possible area to have the expansion of the VDA would be that area in Waimea anyway. Councilmember Yukimura: So what you are saying is everywhere else on the island, wherever there is resort, there is a VDA? Mr. Dahilig: There are areas that are in residential in Po`ipu that are within the VDA also. I want to be able to grab the maps from our department. I have to look at the official zoning maps, but my recollection is what our understanding is. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Mr. Dahilig: We can certainly run back to the office and grab the official maps, unless there is a set here at the Council. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, the maps are here in the plan, right? Mr. Dahilig: No, the zoning maps. The VDA line is in a zoning map, not in the plan maps. Committee Chair Chock: All that will do is validate where it expands to. We already know it does, right? SPECIAL PLANNING 84 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: Right. Councilmember Yukimura: I do not think that is our concern. So the intention of this language, without my amendment, which is "Do not expand existing VDA boundaries beyond resort-designated areas." What was the purpose of doing that? Mr. Dahilig: So that these do not go into residential areas. So anything that is pink on the maps would only be allowed for VDA. Councilmember Yukimura: Beyond what is already covered? Mr. Dahilig: Beyond what is already there. We want to keep it in the pink. We do not want to move it in other places. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. My concept, I think, at the beginning concept of VDA was to define areas where we would limit our resorts on the island to certain areas so they would not be spread all over. Mr. Dahilig: That is a theory. Councilmember Yukimura: Correct. I was saying that it was my understanding and that there was this synergy of uses where people could go to each other's restaurants, like Ka'anapali or elsewhere and that they would have this synergy that happens, which is good for both the individual and the whole. But that is not how it is now being used. Right now, wherever you put resort, it is called a VDA or treated like a VDA, right? Mr. Dahilig: The VDA is a zoning line. It is not a designation line. In order to draw a boundary on the zoning map for the VDA, all we are saying in this, for consistency purposes, is to keep it wherever there is pink on the map. That is it. I do not think there is any other way to explain it than to just say we want it around pink areas. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Mike, right now, you have areas of pink, pink areas, that are not VDA? Mr. Dahilig: My understanding is no, but I think... Council Chair Rapozo: So every resort area that is resort is in the VDA? SPECIAL PLANNING 85 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: That is my understanding, but I would want to consult with the official zoning maps one more time to confirm this. For most, generally, yes. There may be an exception here or there. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, "here and there" are the ones I am concerned about, because the VDAs...the big thing is the TVR...the ability to do the TVR. I do not want to support an expansion of the VDA if we are going to get an increase of TVRs. I thought that not all of the resort areas were in the VDA. Mr. Dahilig: If the Council will be taking a caption break at some point, we can run back to the office and check the maps. I want to make sure that I give you the right information before you vote. Committee Chair Chock: Do you folks want to come back to this one then? Council Chair Rapozo: That is my biggest concern. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, why do we not do that then? We are going to skip Item #20 at this one. For Item #21, we did have some discussion, so I am going to ask for a roll call on this. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Can I get clarity on how Item #21 and#22 go together? Do they go together or against? Council Chair Rapozo: According to Mike, he said apples and oranges. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: They do not exist together. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Roll call for Item#21. Sorry, Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: How are they apples and oranges? I read Item#22 to be a "use it or lose it." Committee Chair Chock: They both are as they currently exist... Councilmember Yukimura: Mike is leaving. Can you ask him to come back? Committee Chair Chock: Mike, I am sorry. We just need a third clarification on Item#21 and#22 and how they conflict with each other. SPECIAL PLANNING 86 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: Okay. What the predominant question before the public process had come out with is that areas that are colored pink on the map have not done anything with it and it leaves this open door. All we are trying to say with Item#21 is that these guys that are in the pink areas need to start that process with the Land Use Commission, then go through the Council to get the zoning for that. That is what we are saying. It was a balance. But at the time, the discussion also hinged on including the Princeville plateau as part of the discussion. In reality, this resort entitlement language only really applies now to KIikiaola. Committee Chair Chock: The question is really about the fact that if Item #21 stays in...their amendment stays in...if it does not pass, then it would conflict with Item#22 if it passes. Mr. Dahilig: It would not. So Item #22 is more a blanket implementation discussion for us across the board. Committee Chair Chock: So when we asked if it was in conflict, I guess the response was that it was apples and oranges. Mr. Dahilig: Yes, it is apples and oranges. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Does that make sense? Councilmember Yukimura: So it does not conflict. Would you say that Item #22 is a "use it or lose it"? Mr. Dahilig: I would say it is a different type of"use it or lose it." Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. It is something that Planning did not object to, because it clarifies what you intended with your language short-duration expiration dates? Mr. Dahilig: It is something that, by practice, we are already doing because of some of the litigation that we have come across with older permits. We want to make sure that old permits do not remain on the books forever, and then you have antiquated exaction requirements. There are a lot of times where we have infrastructure deficits as a consequence of permits that are being pulled up from the `70s and `80s. We do that now as a matter of course to have progressive conditions to try to create a timeline of buildup between three (3) to five (5) years. It is not anything new that we are doing already. Councilmember Yukimura: So right now, for all of your large development permits, you require them to build within three (3) to five (5) years? Mr. Dahilig: We said "support" on this, but we saw it as a matter of semantics of this, because our proposed languages require short-term duration of expiration dates should development not be constructed as permitted. We are in general support of the intent. If the proposal here was just to refine the SPECIAL PLANNING 87 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING language, then that is why we did not say that we did not support it because we already do this. Councilmember Yukimura: So you already do it. Is it in the Zoning Ordinance such that it is a requirement? Mr. Dahilig: No, it is actually a matter of the quasi-judicial process that permits have to undergo. Councilmember Yukimura: Is it your intention to codify it in Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance amendments when you do your CZO process? Mr. Dahilig: Every project that comes in has different facts. Whether we would actually move forward and create a specific deadline, I am not sure where I would go on that. Our Coastal Zone Management (CZM) permits have a two-year expiration date by default in its rules. So it is not unprecedented, but at the same time, I do not know where I would lie on that policy call. Councilmember Yukimura: So you are saying that you presently do it on a case-by-case basis? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. We provide points of enforcement. For instance, if they do not pay an in lieu fee by a certain date, if they do not convey land over by a certain date, if they do not construct improvements by a certain date—those are all opportunities in order to show cause to be followed by the Planning Commission. Councilmember Yukimura: So it is not about building out? Mr. Dahilig: Well, buildout is relative, so again, we are in general support of the intent of what is going on here. If the language is meant to refine what we proposed then that is where our support lies. It is really in the intent behind it. Councilmember Yukimura: But the community has said that they want a "use it or lose it" provision and it is based on buildout, not just on securing the entitlements. They want to actually see things built out. If we say by General Plan and by zoning that we want that kind of development, we want to see it happen within a reasonable timeframe, unlike Princeville that sat on their resort designation for thirty (30) years, right? Mr. Dahilig: For example, let us take Hokua Place for a discussion point for this; the realistic absorption rate for something like Hokua Place would not be five (5) years. So setting a timeframe like this could be unrealistic if you are asking that. We saw the (inaudible) as an example. So having the flexibility is going to be important when you look at some of these larger scale projects that are going to be phased over time. SPECIAL PLANNING 88 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: So you are not in favor of a "use it or lose it" clause on every large development? Mr. Dahilig: How it is employed based on conditions for the Planning Commission, it has to be relative. So it is not to say that we do not or do support it, it is to say that the glove has to fit. Councilmember Yukimura: So for Hokua Place, what kind of buildout timeline are you looking at that? Mr. Dahilig: Well, it depends on the product that they are going to propose. I cannot answer that question other than to say that. Councilmember Yukimura: No, not necessarily, because with Hokua Place, you want affordable housing as fast as possible. You can say, as we have done with Kukui`ula, for example, that you shall build your affordable housing or you shall move toward your affordable housing in these timeframes. That kind of condition is important. You want Hokua Place to sit on their seven hundred (700) permits for many years? Mr. Dahilig: That is not what I was saying. Councilmember Yukimura: I know, but that is what the community wants to prevent. I thought that was the rationale for the "use it or lose it." Mr. Dahilig: All I can say is that the larger projects are subject, based on County law, to undergo a quasi-judicial process where it is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, so you are not in favor of a "use it or lose it" provision, except to the extent of getting full entitlement for resorts as articulated in Item#21? Mr. Dahilig: I believe my statements are being misconstrued here. Councilmember Yukimura: Well, please clarify. I am not trying to put words in your mouth. Mr. Dahilig: On Item #22, the reason why we supported this was because it seemed generally within the realm of our concern. It is not setting a specific timeline. It says, "for example, three (3) to five (5) year sunset clauses on zoning permits." The phrase "permit" it falls within the zoning and permitting sections of the action items in the plan. So when a planner evaluates a Class IV permit that goes through discretionary review, this has to be implemented by condition and not necessarily by a change in the code. If you are asking if we are in support of a change in the code, I would say no. But as the policy applies to the creation of conditions in discretionary permits, I would say that this is consistent with what we do now. SPECIAL PLANNING 89 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: I think we are leading to a call for the question in a moment here. Council Chair Rapozo: I will make that call. Committee Chair Chock: Are there any more questions for Mike? Again, the request is a call for the question on Item #21. Councilmember Yukimura: I am going to withdraw my amendment for Item #21 because I do not hear any consensus from the Planning Department. Councilmember Yukimura withdrew Item No. #21 from Amendment #8, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Councilmember Yukimura: For Item #22, I do not hear consensus either, because the intention...I will withdraw this item also. Councilmember Yukimura withdrew Item No. #22 from Amendment #8, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. We are on Item#23. The motion to approve Item #23 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 6:1:0 (Councilmember Kagawa voted no). (Councilmember Kawakami was noted as not present.) Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #24 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 4*:3:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Brun, Councilmember Kagawa, and Councilmember Kaneshiro voted no.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #25 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 4*:3:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Brun, Councilmember Kagawa, and Councilmember Kaneshiro voted no.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are almost there. The motion to approve Item #26 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 5*:2:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), SPECIAL PLANNING 90 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Brun and Councilmember Kagawa voted no.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #27 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 7*:0:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #28 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 5*:2:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kaua`i, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Brun and Councilmember Kagawa voted no.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. The motion to approve Item #29 of Amendment #8 was then put, and carried by a vote of 4*:3:0 (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Kawakami was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) (Councilmember Brun and Councilmember Kagawa, and Councilmember Kaneshiro voted no.). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Why do we not take our caption break at this time? We will do a ten-minute caption break and come back to the last amendment, Amendment#9. There being no objections, the meeting recessed at 3:02 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 3:12 p.m., and proceeded as follows: (Councilmember Kawakami was noted as present.) Committee Chair Chock: We are back from our caption break. We are actually taking up Item #20 from Amendment #8. Where we left off was that Planning was going to double-check the maps. Mr. Dahilig: So there is one (1) other area that is resort-designated, but does not have VDA, and that is Kapalawai. Committee Chair Chock: Where? Mr. Dahilig: Kapalawai. Committee Chair Chock: Kapalawai. SPECIAL PLANNING 91 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: It is on the Gay & Robinson property. So this is already entitled for a hotel, but just consistent with how this would apply, they would be able to draw a VDA around their pink area as well. Council Chair Rapozo: May I ask a really quick question? Committee Chair Chock: Please. Council Chair Rapozo: How big is that? Mr. Dahilig: Okay. It is pretty much from where Pakala is all the way towards where the warehouse is. Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: It seems like the theory was, let us allow some Resort on a limited level when Kapalawai was passed on the west side, but let us not call the west side a "visitor destination area" because it is sort of easing the concept into the west side, because it is a big change...it is a transformational change, incremental versus transformational. So the question is whether Waimea/Kekaha is a visitor destination area. Mr. Dahilig: If that is the question, I think that is why you are seeing...I know there has been a lot of discussion about provisional as well, but what we want to make sure is that there is a proper community process out there. The community has not had a community plan done since the 1970s. So whether they do or do not want transformational change out there, what we have been saying consistently throughout the presentation of the plan is why we are moving forward with the West Kaua`i Plan if it gets passed would be done, hence that is why we have these provisional designations and that is why we have a great deal of flexibility, because what we did hear during our process with the west side for the General Plan is that they wanted as much flexibility as possible. That is what we were trying to do. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Do you suggest we go with the original language that was in there or we amend it and take out "beyond resort-designated areas"? Mr. Dahilig; Given what happened in question for Item#19, my suggestion would be not to support Item#20. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Kagawa: Got it. SPECIAL PLANNING 92 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Are there any further questions? I would like to take the vote on this. If not, again, a vote on this would be to revise it as it is written. Councilmember Yukimura: So the reason I am proposing this amendment is because Ka`aina was very clear that that is what he said, "Take it out." If Planning does not want to take it out, then I do not need to. All I wanted was clarity about what was meant here. So if they do not want it, I mean, I think there are really key issues that—and this did not—I did not know about Kapalawai. I did not have any intention with respect to the west side in doing this. I just wanted to get clear about what Planning's intention was on this. I do believe, now that Waimea is in the conversation, that it is a really big issue that the west side has to think through very carefully and that resort designation without VDA may give them a really more appropriate designation for the west side, but that is a decision mostly that should be done by west side. So I am not trying to manipulate anything regarding the west side with this amendment. Committee Chair Chock: Would you like to withdraw the amendment? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura withdrew Item No. #20 from Amendment #8, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Committee Chair Chock: Great, that concludes Amendment#8. Councilmember Yukimura: But I would like to get clarity from Planning, because that is all I am trying to do. Committee Chair Chock: Can we get that in a response? Council Chair Rapozo: In writing. Committee Chair Chock: Yes, in writing. Sorry, that is what I meant, in writing. Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: Well... Committee Chair Chock: Can we have a motion to introduce the last package? Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to amend Bill No. 2666 (by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices), as circulated, and as shown in the Floor Amendment, which is attached hereto as Attachment 9, seconded by Councilmember Kagawa. SPECIAL PLANNING 93 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: There was a question earlier about how some of these amendments could essentially affect the whole plan, and the intention is that we would come back, once we have passed everything, to see what some of the implications are and where there are other needs for changes. I know Councilmember Kaneshiro asked that question, so there very well may be the need to update the plan elsewhere. That is why we are really looking at coming back to the table to address all of those potential needs. As it is relates to this last package, I can tell you that my process was basically taking in public testimony and then vetting it with Planning, a lot of this is really the Planning Department's words. I will go through them fairly quickly. I think the Planning Department supports all of my amendments. Item#1 is DHHL as it relates to Wailua lands. I did request in writing some response from DHHL, they submitted it, and I think this is what it is based on it in terms of their plans moving forward in the Wailua corridor. Councilmember Yukimura: May I ask? Committee Chair Chock: Sure. Councilmember Yukimura: What did they say in their response? Committee Chair Chock: Well, it was not an absolute affirmative, but it was that they do have an intention to utilize the land in that area. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: As you can see, that is what that says here. Councilmember Yukimura: Alright. I feel like putting residential there would really violate our ideas of separation of communities. It is kind of encouraging stripped development between Wailua and Lihu`e. I am aware that the late Mayor Baptiste was trying to negotiate with DHHL to move their development into Lihu`e proper, where there is a lot of land that is closer to resources that would not congest the corridor even more. I think we should not include in our plan an affirmation of that particular place, but work with DHHL to bring them into town, which would create better land use, and I think it is something that their beneficiaries would appreciate and like better. Committee Chair Chock: Well, that is not why this is here. It is because I did speak to some of the beneficiaries who are really up in arms about us trying to supersede what their plans are. That is why I made a specific request to DHHL to let me know what their plans are. I understand in terms of your planning perspective that this is what you would like. I do not mind that we would continue discussions about what might be. I am merely stating what their interests are. Councilmember Yukimura: I honor that, but I want to know if you talked to them about alternatives. Committee Chair Chock: No, I did not. I just requested what their plans are and this is what they gave me in writing. SPECIAL PLANNING 94 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: No, I am talking about the beneficiaries that you spoke to. Did you talk to them about possibilities of working with DHHL to put housing and maybe... Committee Chair Chock: The subject did come up and they were opposed to it, yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Moving into Lihu`e? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: And they are opposed to it? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, I just want to say that I met with DHHL a couple of weeks ago and they are very interested in this parcel. They are not opposed to moving, but where is the land? Where is the available land for a land swap in Lihu`e that this County could facilitate? It is not like we have land in Lihu`e town proper. They have already invested in digging the well. They are also very cognizant that they have a lot of people on the list and they are trying to fill up their Anahola projects, but they are very interested in moving forward with this project here. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Is there any further discussion? Item #2 is really to also be consistent with this direction. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Go ahead. Councilmember Yukimura: How many acres are we talking about? Committee Chair Chock: I do not know. Councilmember Yukimura: Can Planning tell us, please? Committee Chair Chock: I do not know. Planning, do you know the acreage involved in this? Mr. Dahilig: Is this on the Wailua lands? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 95 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: I do not know right off the top of my head. When I was in private sector, I was the consultant for Hawaiian Home Lands that design their mauka subdivision, and there was a... Committee Chair Chock: Sorry, it is right here. Mr. Dahilig: Sorry. Committee Chair Chock: Five hundred twenty-six (526) acres in the Wailua area. There are approximately four hundred seventy-four (474) acres on the mauka side and fifty-two (52) acres on the makai side, and there is a map. I have a copy of this letter from DHHL. I can pass it out to all of you. Are there any further questions on this amendment? Councilmember Yukimura: Well, I just want to say, and this does not apply only to this, but in making decisions about that, we need a basic factsheet that says how many acres, what densities, whether water is available, and all of the those issues. We should have it. When an applicant comes before the Planning Department and Planning Commission and asks for these designations, they usually have a whole booklet full of information so that we know what we are acting on. To make these very long-term designations without information is not a really good way to make decisions. I am just saying that for the record. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. I totally understand your position and reasoning behind it. Are there any other questions? If not, what I can do is I can continue to talk about the rest of the amendments. The next section is on climate change and resiliency in the Lihu`e district. It is pretty straightforward. Section 2.1. Councilmember Kaneshiro. This is water use. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Are we on Item#13? Committee Chair Chock: I am sorry, Item#3. Councilmember Yukimura: Item#3. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay, never mind. I am getting ahead of myself. Councilmember Kawakami: You are way ahead of yourself. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Yes. I thought it had climate change so I was thinking of something else. Committee Chair Chock: This really was some of what was requested regarding water and the Water Use Plan. I will just keep going in discussing the rest of the amendments here. This next one, Item #4, was really a lot of testimony, particularly Rupert Rowe, who keeps talking about the issues around drainage. Planning worked diligently at looking at different ways that we can actually increase developing master plans here, culverts, using crossing of water courses by expanding SPECIAL PLANNING 96 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING rather than culverts when possible. Some of the things that I think Councilmember Kawakami also spoke of and wanting to implement in terms of drainage. Go ahead. Councilmember Kaneshiro: My only question was that I could not remember that conversation, "the crossing of water courses by spanning rather than by culverts when possible, so that natural streambeds will not be altered." I was just wondering what the context of that was. Is it like the Waimea River? Committee Chair Chock: Mike, can you tell us about that one, because I do not know when we talk about the water courses. I want to make sure that we are clear. This is page 3 of 16, b. Councilmember Kaneshiro: My assumption was that we were talking about Waimea River and the Waimea Valley, but I do not want to make an assumption and then it is something else. Mr. Dahilig: I am going to turn it over to the expert here. Ms. Williams: A lot of this language actually came from the infrastructure study, the first one we did to prepare for our GP process. It was completed about three (3) years ago by R.M. Towill, who was the consultant. During that time, we definitely did work closely with the Department of Public Works on the language. Essentially, the text description, Action 7, Action 4, and"b" and"c." Those do come from the infrastructure study that was prepared. It is kind of general ideas of what could be done. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Okay, I am good. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: If you go down to "e" also, that is just the continuation of some other... Councilmember Yukimura: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Go ahead, Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: "Spanning,"what is that? I am sorry. I do not understand. Mr. Dahilig: It is like if you have a valley, instead of filling it with a boxed culvert and covering it, you actually create a bridge over it. Ms. Williams: I think the context would primarily be the construction of new roads. Councilmember Yukimura: A "crossing of water courses by spanning rather than by culverts." I see. So, instead of having an enclosed pipe, you are talking about like a bridge over which the road would pass, but it is not an enclosed pipe, basically. Is that what you are talking about? SPECIAL PLANNING 97 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, and is that becoming a best practice for waterways or the building of infrastructure over waterways? Mr. Dahilig: Well, it is also a safety issue because when you put a boxed culvert and create a road over that and you fill around it, essentially you are creating a damming device. If the culvert either gets blocked or the culvert is undersized, you end up with a building up of water behind that boxed culvert, in which case, creates a potential flooding issue. So that is why we think it is also along with just keeping it a natural course from an environmental standpoint, it also presents a human safety factor that we think can be minimized by not creating these pseudo dams. Councilmember Yukimura: What would prevent it from getting clogged up as a span? It is still an obstruction to a ditch or a river. Mr. Dahilig: I wish I had a chalkboard, but essentially, if you are looking at a boxed culvert versus something that is span of the volume underneath the span is going to be quite different. Councilmember Yukimura: A greater volume? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. So it is less likely to dam up? Mr. Dahilig: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: I want to just speak to Item #5 through #8. They really stem from a conversation that we had with the Planning Department, particularly with one of their employees that did somewhat of an internship with the State and realized and suggested the need for more interagency relationship building as well as oversight. So that is where this language is coming from. It is recommended specifically from the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding these, I would entertain those questions to them. Again, that is Item #5 through #8. Then, Item #9 was one that really spoke to the need in identifying cultural practitioners as advisory, not as a council, but to really have a working list that we can go to on decision-making and provide guidance on heritage and cultural issues; that currently does not exist. Then, Item #10 moves into really the question of about how we start to look at the plan or plans through a budget through cost analysis. The closest option that we came to was the capital improvements, the six-year CIP budget, and this speaks to the need for that, to approach CIP from a priority standpoint rather than a wish list. Then, Item#11 is a big one and it moves into the implementation section. Again, there was a lot of discussion previously about adaptive management, about how to track, and some verbiage that we took directly from testimony, and we actually implemented it here. This is all, again, Planning SPECIAL PLANNING 98 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING language that they worked on and developed in that response. If I could move to Item#13, this is the one that came from Luke Evslin on climate change. I know there is a question on this one. Before we entertain it, because really, the question is around"Kauai must reduce ground transportation emissions by one hundred percent (100%) by 2045." Again, I know that there are issues about how we measure it, where we get this from, and this was something that, I think, Planning can respond to and why they support it. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: My question was just on "Kaua`i must reduce ground transportation emissions by one hundred percent (100%) by 2045." I did not know what that meant, and if you can just clarify. Mr. Dahilig: The idea is moving and progressing to a transition for vehicles that are not burning fossil fuels. In reviewing this over the past couple of weeks, was come up is with some big announcements by large corporations, like Pepsi and Budweiser, which I follow closely. They have made competing announcements that they are purchasing semi-trailer trucks that are going to be built by Tesla. So the idea of whether or not twenty-five (25), twenty-eight (28), or twenty-nine (29) years down the road you are able to see a transition to this type of non-fossil fuel burning ground transportation vehicles is plausible. I think it is potentially in line with what the State goal at 2045 is with respect to fossil fuel-based or emissions-based energy generation. So it is not inconceivable. The time between when the Wright Brothers took their flight and when commercial airfares went out was less than twenty-eight (28) years. So it is not inconceivable that the technology can get to that point where it is now the dominant form. We think it is a goal in mind with what the Paris Agreement is as well as with what the State has adopted as law. But again, is it realistic? It can happen, but I am not a scientist in that area. Committee Chair Chock: In response to that, I am open, Members, because of the concern. I realize that we want to be as accurate as possible. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Again, when it says we are going to reduce our ground transportation emissions by one hundred percent (100%) by 2045, is that assuming that every single vehicle on this island is electric? Council Chair Rapozo: Yes. Mr. Dahilig: The technology is there. Is it plausible? Yes. Is it realistic? I think that is a judgment call for the body. Councilmember Yukimura: Mr. Chairman? Committee Chair Chock: Yes, sorry. Councilmember Yukimura: Our Multimodal Transportation Plan is targeting a fifteen percent (15%) reduction in greenhouse gasses by 2035 and that is, I think, mainly by mode shift rather than electric vehicles. So there is fifteen SPECIAL PLANNING 99 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING percent (15%). This provision implies that you would only do it by converting vehicles to all electric, but there are other ways of doing that actually...this does not address traffic congestion, just converting cars to electric. Shifting mode of travel—this is voluntary shifting—we are not mandating anybody, from single occupant vehicles to transit and walking and biking can also bring you results in greenhouse gas reduction. So I just would like to see a policy that is integrated. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: I am ready to vote. Councilmember Kawakami: I have one (1) comment. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: I think you may have to change the H.B. 623 to the appropriate Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) because the H.B. is referring to House Bill as it was floating through the Legislature. So I do not even know if it was even passed. It is wordsmithing, but if it is going to be in the document, then it has to pertain to the specific HRS and not the House Bill. Committee Chair Chock: I would entertain everything from "Kaua`i" all the way to the end if, in fact, we would get the support for it, if that would move us in the direction of support. Yes, I am open for it. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Well, for me, I think it is a great goal, but I do not know how realistic it is because it says "all County vehicles" also. So it is assuming that we are going to switch out all our buses to an electric bus. How are we going to charge them? I think I am okay with the regular language the way it is. It says "any technological breakthroughs in electric vehicles"—we are going to try to reduce consumption of fuel, but then when we start putting this in...I do not know...it is a little harder for me to chew. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Council Chair. Council Chair Rapozo: I think I wanted to just continue the sentence Councilmember Kaneshiro was reading where it says, "but until those technologies take hold and become affordable," which I think that is the critical part. This mandates that by 2045, one hundred percent (100%) of cars are going to be electric. I do not know if people understand how much one of those cars costs and the batteries. I think the existing language is realistic. I think the existing language acknowledges that the technology is still relatively new, and I think we had that discussion the other day about you better have enough charging stations around this island or you are going to be stuck. It is a great goal, and I think earlier in one of the earlier amendments, one of the Councilmembers made a comment that you are giving people false hope. I think this is what this does. It is difficult and maybe as this General Plan is revisited five (5) years from now or ten (10) years from now, somebody will have to readdress it. SPECIAL PLANNING 100 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: In my mind, when we are setting goals, we are not setting realistic goals. Goals have to make a stretch. I think when KIUC first set their goals, everybody thought, "I do not know how they are going to do it." When the Governor set his goal of one hundred percent (100%) electricity, everybody thought that is just "pie-in-the-sky," but the thing about goals is that if everyone embraces the goal, then whatever technology comes, you develop a plan and you begin to move toward it. That is what a goal does. So I would not vote against the goal just because it is unrealistic. So it needs to be set somewhere in the area of... Committee Chair Chock: You can dream, but not too big. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Something like that, yes. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: But if you do not have a goal, you are pretty sure that you are not going to make it. Committee Chair Chock: Is there any other discussion on this item? Councilmember Kagawa: I think her "goals" are like "sprawl." My "goals" are actually...I like to set goals that you can achieve and a realistic one, because then you take some pride when you reach it and say, "Hey, we met our goal." You do not want to make the goal so far that you never achieve it, otherwise, you will never have satisfaction. Again, we are back to "sprawl." Committee Chair Chock: Is there any other further discussion? If not, I want to just introduce the last set...actually, there are two (2) sets of amendments. The next one is a submission or recommendations by Dr. Vaughan. This is regarding the heritage sections. They are not really big amendments. As you can see, they are mostly some additions and then also utilization of the proper place name. Lastly, Item#24 to the end here, was also based on testimony that came here to the Council from the Kauai Watershed Alliance. They had made some specific recommendations on watershed that I have included here. It looks like it is verbatim from what it is they submitted and concurred by the Planning Department. Councilmember Yukimura: I have a question. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 101 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: The Kaua`i Watershed Alliance, is that different from the Alliance of Landowners? Committee Chair Chock: I do not know. I do not know that answer. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I do not know what the Alliance of Landowners is. Committee Chair Chock: Well, it is mentioned. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Kaua`i Watershed Alliance is the nature conservancy. Councilmember Yukimura: Is that the one you sit on? Councilmember Kaneshiro: Yes, I am on it. Councilmember Kagawa: You have to recuse. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Thank you. Councilmember Kaneshiro: If you want. I do not gain any advantage from the language in here. Councilmember Kagawa: I am just kidding. Councilmember Kaneshiro: But Kaua`i Watershed Alliance is made up of landowners in the upper watershed, and it is only landowners in the upper watershed because that is who owns the land around there. Councilmember Yukimura: Right. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Their goal is to preserve and perpetuate watershed areas in that area. Councilmember Yukimura: Right. I see on page 99, the Kauai Watershed Alliance is mentioned. It was started in 2003 and I believe it was Ernie Lau who was the water engineer at that time who was concerned about water quantity and quality, and knew that the watershed was critical to that. I just wanted to know if that was the group that proposed these amendments. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmembers, as far as I know, they are the only formal watershed organization. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, great. Committee Chair Chock: There are others at the Wao Nahele level, which is upper watershed. Of course, there is the Hanalei Watershed Hui. There are other councils that are somewhat inactive; the Nawiliwili Watershed Hui and others SPECIAL PLANNING 102 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING that are just starting to revitalize and get established. We had this conversation earlier about the various sections of the watershed of how they operate independently and how they should be working also collectively from mauka to makai. Both are, as I said earlier, important. Based on sort of your inquiry about investing in multiple, from my perspective, I do not think we have that problem. I do not think it exists right now where we are trying to fund or support multiple watershed councils. They truly do not exist, in my opinion, and the only good example in the middle watershed to makai is Hanalei Watershed Hui. So I think to say that collectively, the County supports the establishment of watershed councils is absolutely fine, at least from my perspective. I do not know if that is helpful. Councilmember Yukimura: It is. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Kagawa: I have a question. Councilmember Yukimura: Are these proposals from Allan Rietow? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I am just beginning to understand source and everything. Committee Chair Chock: Council Vice Chair Kagawa. Councilmember Kagawa: I have a question on Item #19. Other than that, I can support all of Dr. Vaughan's amendments. But for Item #19, Mike, I am concerned that you folks support that one. I am wondering if we have the capacity, skill, expertise, and manpower to do the inventory part. I understand the State has some or all of that function, so I am wondering if we put that in the General Plan, now does the Hawaiian culture look to us and say, "Hey, come on," when actually, we do not have that capacity? Is that a concern of yours? Mr. Dahilig: Essentially, we see it as investment to help us in the long-term when we see the word "inventory," because we are going to have to pull this knowledge together to comply with our constitutional review process. So my acknowledging, but also inventorying and creating a database, and because the Council has funded that Land Use Management Information System, we will be able to provide some effort to at least create that baseline and that is why we are okay with it. Councilmember Kagawa: I understand, but sometimes the community does not know you are doing something there. You are talking about things of the past that sometimes have washed away and sometimes are buried. When you do make a mistake down the line, they can look at you now, the County, and say, "Hey, you took this on." So I do not know if we should take out that word, just to be safe. I do not know how Dr.Vaughan feels. Do you support it? I am just trying to be cautious here. SPECIAL PLANNING 103 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: I understand. The ability to create a database of historic sites and important archaeological areas is not going to be foolproof. There will be situations where there are inadvertent finds that there are protocols under State law that if there is an inadvertent find, you have to employ those protocols. So from a liability standpoint—the County Attorney could weigh-in if he wanted to concerning whether or not that would pose a greater liability for us for creating inventory—but as a matter of process when we permit, we do have to search databases to ensure compliance with our constitutional mandates. Councilmember Kagawa: That is why I am worried. Sometimes we should just keep the existing language because I think the existing language actually did not really state that we would do the inventory. Mr. Dahilig: I understand. Ms. Vaughan: I just wanted to speak to your question really quickly. I think longer term, and it is probably out of the realm of this plan, but one of the things... Committee Chair Chock: Could you state your name, please, for the record? Ms. Vaughan: Sorry. My name is Mehana Vaughan. Longer-term to add, as you added the University designation around Kauai Community College (KCC), having a traditional land use designation really makes sense. It is something that Moloka`i has done and the idea is not just that you show where the to i were and the fishponds, heiau, and important access gathering places were, but that they come with certain protections, certain tax breaks for landowners who care for them, certain provisions for access, and those sorts of things. So that would be something to build to. It might sound like too much for now, but this is a step in the right direction. There is a heritage map, but it is pretty surface and there is a mill here and this here. So to be able to get more in-depth in order to document things so that they can be protected is important. You are going to run into less landowner conflict as well, because when somebody buys a parcel, they will know that there is a heiau in this parcel or these were former to i lands. It is also important because you cannot put lo`i, for instance, anywhere. You need certain elevation and certain water flow. That was the original land use planning process of our island, was where those things are sited. They cannot be anywhere else. So it is really important to know where they are and moving an auwai and building a house right there might not be the highest and best use of that place. So the idea of this is just to have the information there. I think it is key that it takes place in the community planning processes because not every community wants to map these things. It is going to be up to them. It is not like archaeologists come in and say, "Boom, boom. These are all of your sacred sites. Let us put them all on a map really big." It is part of the community planning processes. It can be a slow process. People can identify things. But with Geographic Information System (GIS) capability, both at the County-level and some of our young people in our community, these kinds of things SPECIAL PLANNING 104 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING are much easier to do and a lot of them are in existing layers already, such as kuleana, et cetera. Councilmember Kagawa: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: I see our County Attorney here. Councilmember Kagawa: Just that word "inventory" makes me worry. Mr. Trask: For the record, Mauna Kea Trask, County Attorney. You are right and Dr. Vaughan stated it, too. When you go through the development process, the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) has original jurisdiction over archeological sites and their preservation and protection, as well as inadvertent Native Hawaiian burials, whereas the Burial Council has jurisdiction over previously identified. It is correct, it depends how you do it. When you inventory something and it is known, then it becomes accessible and when it becomes accessible, even Native Hawaiians and non-Native Hawaiians with a lot of sympathy and their heart is in the right place will inadvertently vandalize a heiau and they will try to clear it and will burn it. What that does is it resets the polarity of the stones. You cannot date them anymore and all of these kinds of important things that you learn about when you are aware of archaeological things. Access to it and opening access to it will just ruin it. It just does. So you have to be cognizant. Native Hawaiians do not like talking about where the bones are and what are important sites because as soon as a wahi pana is identified, you will see new-age crystals show up and their people start to claim their spiritual vortexes, and they will just get wrecked. So it is a balance. You can do it if you do it appropriately balanced. I think that is the whole point. Councilmember Kagawa: I am good. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: For Dr. Blaich, so the word"inventory" means not just identify on a heritage map, but develop background information and store that in the GIS system and the planning documents. Is that what you have in mind? Ms. Vaughan: That is a great question. I think it means to go beyond. Identify is important, but also to support the efforts that are going on throughout our community, too, like Kaua`i Kuapapa, etcetera, to attach to collect information about that so that we know more about these places so that can be stored and to make it accessible where and as appropriate to enhance the management and care taking of those places. Councilmember Yukimura: Does Moloka`i have an example of that? You said they have... Ms. Vaughan: They do. I can provide you with the links. They have their entire traditional land use layer, certain types of treatment that are SPECIAL PLANNING 105 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING afforded to those areas, and also how they store and manage that GIS database. I can send that to you. I wanted to highlight, too, that I felt when I read these parts of the plan that they were really focused on archaeology, (inaudible). But there are a lot of places that were not stone and they have gone away, but they were equally important. There is now newer ways to think about them. Those can be gathering areas. Those can be salt-making places. Those can be things that we do not always think of as heiau. So that is where the word wahi pana comes in and reference to to i kalo, fishponds, and things like that. Councilmember Yukimura: Who does this Moloka`i inventory that is on this link? Ms. Vaughan: I am not sure, but I can find out more for you. We have the links to the information. I can send those as examples and then I can look more into the "how" of it. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. I am just thinking about the implementation phase. I think that is what Council Vice Chair Kagawa is thinking, too. No? Councilmember Kagawa: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I am just wondering if there is a way to partner with groups that would be able to do that. Ms. Vaughan: Definitely. Councilmember Yukimura: So yes, I would be interested in how. Ms. Vaughan: Two (2) examples, OHA, with their K`ipuka Database, are doing a much better job now and have invested a lot of money. They are a great partner because they are making a lot of this accessible and they are documenting a lot it. There is also an organization Huliauapa`a, which is Native Hawaiian archaeologists and folks involved in state historic preservation across Hawaii. They are doing really great work. Those are the kinds of entities that can help. So it does not have to all have to be done by County at all. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, that is good. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: I will just add. Poor Lea. I took her on this crazy ride because this was really one of my interests in trying to create inventory. At this 'aka, we created these maps, we kind of identified how we would map it and how we would inventory it. We spent kind of a lot of hours on it and in actuality, I passed them out to some of the practitioners at this 'aka and what happened was people came back and they were very hesitant in providing the locations of these wahi pana. So we are always caught up in this balance of do we or do we not? I think one of the reasons why I did support it when I was looking at this was it says not only wahi pana, which is broader, but also the community planning process, which really articulates that when we have to, we will because this is part of when we need to start SPECIAL PLANNING 106 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING protections. Then also, the fact that there are other organizations that are probably have more credentials than we can trust to hold that tike. Mr. Trask: One more thing is that I think it is important for the Council to consider that a couple of years ago, Native Hawaiians were recognized as the only indigenous people in the State of Hawai`i under HRS 10(H). That is a really important fact to know because it is beyond the racial recognition. It is a political one. So a lot of these issues, Native Hawaiians should be the ones to lead the inventory and acknowledgment of their own sites. It is not a community planning process; it is a Native Hawaiian community planning process, that is the way it should be and that is the appropriate way to support Native Hawaiian self-determination, protection of their own cultural rights, because no one can do it for the Native Hawaiians. They need to it for themselves and that is the important part of the discussion because it is "theirs." Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Is there any more discussion on any of the amendments? Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: On Item #21, which is, "Promote access with kuleana through stewardship agreements, work days, jobs" et cetera, do you mean promote access "to" kuleana... Ms. Vaughan: No, because this is not about Kuleana Lands; this is about kuleana as a behavior and the way you interact with land responsibly; leaving it better than you found it. It is about a Hawaiian value and way of life, which, I think is really important and a key tool to find ways that places are neither completely closed off to everyone nor completely opened to the universe. Councilmember Yukimura: Right. Ms. Vaughan: We need that. We need something in between and this is the key. Are you are going in the way that makes the place better and gives back to the place, contributes, and helps take care of it? Councilmember Yukimura: So you are not talking about a land area, which are Kuleana, but the way that you approach to... Ms. Vaughan: No. I am talking about the way you approach. I am sorry that it is confusing, but this could be access to a mountaintop or it could be access to a taro patch, it could be access to a variety of different areas, but it is how you access and how you use the place in a value and the way of behaving that gives back to the place. This land is open one (1) day a month for workdays for people to come and do clean ups. Teaching classes with Kaua`i kids, and they talk about the places they went to when they were young, these are fifteen (15) to seventeen (17) year olds, they cannot go to the places they went when they were seven (7). That is a huge change in a short time and it is not acceptable because they want to be able to go and take their kids there. How do we do that? Find ways for them to have jobs to be caretakers to be going to monitor invasive species, to replant natives, to do special SPECIAL PLANNING 107 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING reef monitoring and then maybe they get that kind of thing, to hunt in areas that are closed, because at the same time, they are willing to pull out weeds, et cetera. Mr. Trask: How we took this was in reviewing...it is like Salt Pond. That community approaches that area with kuleana and takes care of it. It is more than that. The old idea of conservation is that you box it up and no one can go and it is safe forever. No. It just gets overgrown with guinea grass and you lose it. That is the truth. Hawaiians saw that they were part of the environment, not separate from it and that is what makes it important. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: For Item #17, "Encourage restoration, management, and practitioner access for significant cultural sites on private land."— I only bring this up because I have had some experience with people that me, personally, I do not think was a practitioner, but demanding to be on private property. To me, again, it comes to the point of if we do not let people on, it gets preserved because nobody is there. But if people saying, "I am a practitioner. I need access," and you do not even know who they are or what they do, I guess it comes down to accountability and I do not know where that accountability stands as far as who is a practitioner and who is not a practitioner. But I can tell you my only fear with this is that there are going to be people that says, "I am a practitioner and the General Plan says this, so I should have rights to get onto private property for significant cultural sites." That is my only fear in it because I have experienced it before. It is a very touchy subject and it is difficult. There are probably practitioners I respect and love and would have them go out there, but then there are others that I am like, "I do not really know what you are." We have had people that have moved here and think they are a practitioner. I do not know. It is a little scary. The original language was, "Encourage the restoration, management, and public practitioner access for significant cultural sites," but when you open it to public access, then it is a long process where people have to decide, do we want the public to access this or not? When it is just one (1) individual person, it is a little harder to skid around it, because obviously, one (1) person is less intrusive, but they could be way more intrusive than complete public access. It is just one (1) of my fears in that. Committee Chair Chock: It kind of goes back to why I put together Item#9 on page 5, which is the advisory cultural practitioners to be utilized in that sense so that we can help to validate the authenticity of it. Mr. Trask: One (1) of the things you can do, "cultural practitioner" is kind of a term de jour right now. For a lot of people, there is no clear definition. But the law does recognize that Native Hawaiians, who are descendants of those people who inhabited these islands prior to 1778, do have these rights and the standard is less than fully developed land. So you could keep it as-is and then add "as allowed by law" at the end, or you could say, "Encourage the restoration, management, and access for significant cultural sites on private land by Native Hawaiians," because that is what it is. If you are not Native Hawaiian, you cannot SPECIAL PLANNING 108 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING do that. You just cannot claim that. You have to establish and be a Public Access Shoreline Hawai`i WASH) Hawaiian. That is what it is. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Kaneshiro: For me, if we put "as allowed by law," I would be a lot more comfortable with it. But I can tell you that there are people that will take this and say, "I am a practitioner. Give me access to your private property." It is a difficult situation. Mr. Trask: Native Hawaiians can, whether you have a malo or not. But if you are not Native Hawaiian, malo or not, you cannot. That is a pretty good rule. Ms. Vaughan: This is a difficult issue and it continues to be litigated. I know case law is evolving, but on Moloka`i, for example, one thing that was established was the "right to malama." If a practitioner was going to take care of a place, that was a higher standard of protection. There was also that recent case in Kalalau on Kaua`i with the Native Hawaiian gentleman that it was acknowledged that he was going take care of it, but he did not have a camping permit. So his practitioner access was upheld, but it was a balance and the court decision was that ultimately, there was a public trust responsibility to the quality of experience of everyone else who went to Kalalau and the State had to protect that. So they ended up deciding that even though he had the right to practitioner access, they decided against him. There is a balancing and it is complicated, but I think Committee Chair Chock's idea of having advisory boards to help and also adding "as allowed by law," because there is definitely recognition of those rights in law and it is evolving. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. Are there any further questions on any of the amendments? Do you have another question? Councilmember Yukimura: No. I just want to say that this is a really helpful discussion because I never did know myself how "practitioner" is defined and I can also understand the concerns of landowners. Thank you. Committee Chair Chock: Members, the last round of amendments was pretty painful. I will go in seriatim if necessary, but if at all possible, whatever we can agree on, I would like to package them together so we can have one (1) vote on them and then take the ones to work on separately. So let us just go. Can I just get a sense of... Councilmember Kaneshiro: I had one more question on the Kaua`i watershed stuff, but maybe I will just bring it up when we get to it because it gets super confusing when we keep jumping back and forth. I guess we will go through them and if I have a question on it, I will just ask it then so we do not jump around. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. SPECIAL PLANNING 109 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: I think we can do Dr. Vaughan's as long as we do that friendly amendment. We can do all of hers right now. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. We will take it down the line so I do not get too confused, now that we know where we are with that. Councilmember Kagawa: Okay. Committee Chair Chock: Would I be able to take Item #1 and Item #2 together? Are there any discrepancies? Councilmember Kagawa: I have no problem. Committee Chair Chock: I know Councilmember Yukimura has some issues. If not... Councilmember Yukimura: Yes, they are related, so take them together. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Let us take a vote on Item #1 and#2 as they are related. The motion to approve Item #1 and Item #2 of Amendment #9 was then put, and unanimously carried* (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b) of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Councilmember Yukimura was noted as silent, but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.). Committee Chair Chock: I am trying to see if I should put these all together here... Council Chair Rapozo: Does anyone have an issue with Item #3 and Item #4? Committee Chair Chock: Item #3 and Item #4 seems like they are the ones that were together on water. Are there any issues on those? If not, I can put them together. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. The motion to approve Item #3 and Item #4 of Amendment #9 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Thank you. Again, this is the Planning one, Items #5 through #8 in relation to SHPD. Should I take them out of order or can I put them together? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 110 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Kagawa: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Item #9 is really a separate one here with cultural practitioners and the listing that I am looking to try and establish. The motion to approve Item#9 of Amendment#9 was then put, and carried by a vote of 4:3:0 (Councilmember Brun, Councilmember Kagawa, and Councilmember Kaneshiro voted no). Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Kagawa: They did not even vote. Committee Chair Chock: They are silent that is why. Councilmember Kawakami: I said "aye." The cultural practitioner one? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Too late, you voted already. Just kidding. Let us start again, everybody. Anyway, we are on the capital improvements section, which is the one by itself. The motion to approve Item #10 of Amendment#9 was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are on implementation. Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: This one is a huge section and I just wanted to be sure if it was Planning's intent to replace this whole section. Committee Chair Chock: Just for the record, what is missing here is the action plan, the matrix, or the table that was highly discussed when we got together. The changes that you are looking at are mostly in the text and with the focus on the Kakou Committee and their participation in implementation. Mike, can you come up? Mr. Dahilig: I will let the expert answer again on this one. Committee Chair Chock: Do you want to repeat it? Councilmember Kaneshiro: Yes. When we are adding sections that take up almost two (2) or three (3) pages of our folder or four (4) to five (5) paragraphs, I just want to know if it is the intent of Planning to support this amendment and have this amendment in or are they comfortable with the language if this is added? I want to get your folks' temperature. Ms. Williams: A lot of the new language was meant to be a lot clearer about what our implementation program would be because there were so SPECIAL PLANNING 111 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING many questions about what that would look like, what actually would get done, and what next steps were. So we realized that Chapter 4, our Implementation chapter, was one (1) chapter where we did not lay out what our implementation actions were like we did in the other sections. So we thought we would repeat that calling out of clear actions within our four (4) tools in the chapter, so we do that in Item#12 of this amendment. To us, this is a positive step forward because it very clearly states how we will implement this plan so there is no confusion. Councilmember Kaneshiro: So Item #11 and Item #12 together is Planning's? Ms. Williams: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: How do you define "adaptive management"? Ms. Williams: There are definitely ways to define it out there. In the urban planning context, I was unable to find something that was clearly defined. What I typically do is I go to the American Planning Association and they do very detailed reports and studies every few months that kind of help keep me up-to-date. I was unable to find anything regarding adaptive management and how it is implemented on the General Plan side. So what we did do is look throughout how adaptive management is used in the field of science and kind of thought that while essentially what it is calling to do is it basically accepts that we cannot predict everything that might occur over the next ten (10) to twenty (20) years, so we will have to evaluate what is going on and change our course. If new changes come up, we are going to have to take another look at this plan. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Ms. Williams: It is simply articulating that process. Councilmember Yukimura: So it is basically periodic monitoring and then adjusting or making sure that you are still moving towards your goals? Ms. Williams: Yes. We also wanted to tie it to our feedback loop, the info graphic that is already in Chapter 4. We felt that also kind of shows how our adaptive management framework would look like. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I do not know what you are referring to. Oh, your Implementation section. Ms. Williams: Yes. Page 220, Figure 4-1. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, I got it. So under your Implementation actions, I am thinking where you have permitting and code changes and you say, "Review all special management area permits for consistency with the General Plan," do you not actually mean permit applications? SPECIAL PLANNING 112 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Ms. Williams: Correct. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay, because otherwise it sounds like you are going back to existing permits and you are checking with their consistency, and that would be pretty chaotic. Ms. Williams: That is correct. It should be "permit applications." Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. For Item #12, A.2., "Review all discretionary County permit applications..." Ms. Williams: Yes, we should probably add that word onto that as well. Councilmember Yukimura: So is that like your Class IV Zoning? Ms. Williams: And Class III in some cases. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. Then, "Review all changes in the County Zoning Districts for consistency." So is that all rezoning applications or zoning applications? Ms. Williams: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: So "Review all zoning applications in County Zoning Districts" or can we just say "zoning applications for consistency with the General Plan"? Ms. Williams: "Zoning applications" would work as well. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. "Review all zoning applications for consistency with the General Plan," and then, "Review all boundary amendment applications to State Land Use Commission"—oh, let us see. The boundary amendments...what? Committee Chair Chock: I think they are just questions at this point. Do we need more time on this one? Should we pull this one? Councilmember Kagawa: It sounds like there are a lot of typos. Mr. Dahilig: If there is a concern regarding this, we can... again, this was more responsive if anything. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Mr. Dahilig: So if the responsive work product is not what is wanted by the body, then we can look at it more. SPECIAL PLANNING 113 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: I am just asking for clarity because it does not make sense to review permits that have already been granted. So I get that you are asking that any more decisions that come before you once the General Plan is approved, then you will constantly, on all of the applications, ask whether they are consistent with the General Plan. Committee Chair Chock: Here is what I would like to do, Councilmember Yukimura and everyone else—it is apparent to me that we are going to have to come back, and we will, as planned in January, because there are amendments that we never got it, as well as the clean-up of this. I would like to move this particular one. What I will do at this point is withdraw this amendment and work on it further. The reason why is there was more work that was talked about in terms of the table and I really wanted to see how it coincided. Councilmember Yukimura had a strong interest in working on that. I just feel like there could be a lot more work in this area, and if possible, that we could take the rest of the time that we have for the rest of the year before we come back and continue to work on it. Is that feasible to the Members? Councilmember Kagawa: So, "receive"? Committee Chair Chock: Just withdraw this particular amendment. Councilmember Yukimura: And work on it for our next meeting in the New Year? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. I know Jenelle and I have a couple more amendments that...because of the process that has evolved where we go to Planning and then they come back to us, we just could not work on it from Monday. Committee Chair Chock: No, I know. Councilmember Yukimura: Then there is the Housing amendment that was withdrawn. Committee Chair Chock: We are going to talk about that. Councilmember Yukimura: Can we not make it January 3rd because then nobody gets a Christmas vacation. Committee Chair Chock: I still need to ask how many others are involved in additional amendments. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. (Council Chair Rapozo was noted as not present.) SPECIAL PLANNING 114 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Let us just get through this. I am going withdraw this one now, if possible. Councilmember Yukimura: Are you talking about just the one from... Committee Chair Chock: Just the Implementation section. Councilmember Kagawa: Item#11 and Item#12? Committee Chair Chock: Correct, Item#11 and Item#12. Councilmember Kaneshiro moved to withdraw Items #11 and #12, Councilmember Kagawa withdrew the second. Committee Chair Chock: Thank you. We are onto the "big dream" one. Let us just take the vote on it. Councilmember Kawakami: Which one is that? Councilmember Yukimura: The electric cars. Committee Chair Chock: This is the climate change, electric cars. Roll call on Item #13. The motion to approve Item#13 of Amendment#9, as amended, was then put, and carried by the following vote: FOR ITEM#13: Kawakami, Rapozo, Yukimura, Chock TOTAL— 4*, AGAINST ITEM#13: Brun, Kagawa, Kaneshiro TOTAL— 3, EXCUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0, RECUSED & NOT VOTING: None TOTAL — 0. (*Pursuant to Rule No. 5(b)of the Rules of the Council of the County of Kauai, Council Chair Rapozo was noted as silent (not present), but shall be recorded as an affirmative vote for the motion.) Councilmember Kagawa: Dream on. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. Councilmember Kawakami: No, but it is mandated by HRS. Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Kawakami: It is kind of redundant. Committee Chair Chock: I did not think that was going to pass. Is there a need to change it because Councilmember Kawakami, you had brought up HRS? SPECIAL PLANNING 115 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: That can be a typo change. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, that is just a friendly amendment, if we can ensure that is taken care of. Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Thank you. Councilmember Kawakami: It is a mandated change. Councilmember Kagawa: You folks can thank Council Chair Rapozo. Committee Chair Chock: We are on Dr. Vaughan's amendments. I would like to take them... Councilmember Brun: Council Chair Rapozo was going to vote the other way. Committee Chair Chock: Well, too bad. Can we just work on Item #17 first and then we will take rest of them? Councilmember Kagawa: Okay. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I think if the friendly amendment was just to add "as allowed by law" at the end. (Council Chair Rapozo was noted present.) Councilmember Yukimura: Right. Committee Chair Chock: Oh, okay. Was that it? Councilmember Yukimura: Yes. Councilmember Kawakami: Where is it? Councilmember Yukimura: Item#17. Committee Chair Chock: Item#17, "as allowed by law." Councilmember Yukimura: If it is a friendly amendment, we can take them all together. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Kagawa: Yes. SPECIAL PLANNING 116 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Are you okay with the other one, too, Item #19? Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, I am good. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, as it relates to Item #14 through Item #23. The motion to approve Items #14 through #23 (#17 was amended) of Amendment#9, was then put, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We are on the last section, which is the Kaua`i Watershed Alliance amendments. Are there any questions on this? I think Councilmember Kaneshiro had something. Councilmember Kaneshiro: Jenelle is checking on it. You can take other questions. Committee Chair Chock: Are there any other questions on these amendments? These are Items #24 through #30. I guess my only question is in regards to Council Chair Rapozo's receiving of his amendments and ensuring that we are covering what we need. Council Chair Rapozo: That is fine. I figured if I walked out of the room, you folks would rush through these. Councilmember Yukimura: You guessed it. Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Kaneshiro. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I will just clarify. My question was there was a section that was added that I did not see in the letter that came from the Kaua`i Watershed Alliance, but Jenelle corrected me and let me know that they took a section out already in the plan and put it somewhere else. Committee Chair Chock: Yes, that is right. Councilmember Kaneshiro: When I looked at it initially, I was thinking that it should all coincide with the letter, and then when I saw that one section, I was thinking, "I do not know where it came from." But she clarified that it came from another section in the plan and they were just moving it. Committee Chair Chock: It was the Wao Nahele section. Councilmember Kaneshiro: So I am good. Committee Chair Chock: Okay, good. Are there any other questions on the watershed amendments? SPECIAL PLANNING 117 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Are we planning to take them all at once? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Kagawa: No. Committee Chair Chock: No? Okay, would you like to take one (1) out or all of them? Councilmember Kagawa: Yes, I have some of those. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Council Chair Rapozo: I have a question. Are we on Item#24? Committee Chair Chock: Items #24 through#30. Council Chair Rapozo: I noticed on Item #29, I know that everybody looked at the watershed amendments earlier from my packet which we received, but I think one of the important items I thought on my batch was the establishment of the councils. I noticed that on page 15 of 16, "1" and "g," Jenelle told me it is a duplicate, so you can eliminate one of them, whichever one. I guess take your pick. I would probably remove "f," because it is the same as "g," D.S. But I noticed in "h" on the middle watershed, there is "Support the establishment of community based councils to assist," but in "g," that is being removed. I was just curious as to why. Why would there not be "the establishment of community based councils to assist the watershed management issues" of the upper watershed? Committee Chair Chock: I think it is in there that is why, if I am not mistaken. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, this is removing it. Committee Chair Chock: I know, but I am thinking that it is somewhere else. Councilmember Yukimura: We just want one (1) council, right? Councilmember Kawakami: Yes. Council Chair Rapozo: Well, in "h," you are establishing it for the middle. If there is an overriding one, I apologize. I am just going off of this sheet. If there is an overriding section that supports the establishment of community-based councils, then I am okay. But this looks like they are taking it out of upper and adding it into the middle, and middle, the drainage and freshwater resources. They are moving it out on page 100, but adding it in page 104. Committee Chair Chock: I do not have their... SPECIAL PLANNING 118 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: I do not sense the support for the rest of the amendments that I had proposed earlier. Again like I said, if there is no desire to go back there, then we will not. If there is, then I will reintroduce them. I do not see the need to rehash, but I am interested in the establishment of the watershed councils. Councilmember Yukimura: Committee Chair Chock? Committee Chair Chock: Yes, Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: I do not know how all of these parts come together, but I am hoping that they come to the establishment of community-based councils to assist with watershed management as one (1) mauka to makai group and not have four (4) different sections of the ahupua a. I think that was the intention of the Kaua`i Watershed proposal. Committee Chair Chock: You are right. That is not what it says though. Council Chair Rapozo: The Kaua`i Watershed Alliance is saying that it is not relevant to the upper watershed, but I question that. Why is not it relevant to the upper? Councilmember Yukimura: Maybe we should work on this. Committee Chair Chock: I wonder if it is because they are already established. That is what I am hearing. Mike? Council Chair Rapozo: I guess for me, the important part of all of this is having the community-based organization. That, to me, is what is vital. It is in there. It is in the General Plan, and I am just wondering why it came out. Mr. Dahilig: I think they are proposing to take it out because they are the community-based watershed management organization. So the alliance amongst all of those different entities is why I think they are proposing to take it out, because they believe they are it. Council Chair Rapozo: Mike, in your opinion, are they it? Mr. Dahilig: They function as community-based management for the upper watershed area. Council Chair Rapozo: How are they selected? Mr. Dahilig; I think it is a representation of landowners and other stakeholders like DLNR. Council Chair Rapozo: Does the community have a say in who gets on that alliance? SPECIAL PLANNING 119 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Dahilig: No. Council Chair Rapozo: Then they are not community-based. Mr. Dahilig: Okay. Councilmember Yukimura: Can we see the testimony? Why do we not move it to January and least get input from Mr. Rietow? Councilmember Kagawa: Nobody is ready. Council Chair Rapozo: What? Councilmember Kagawa: We are not ready for this. Let us push it to January. Council Chair Rapozo: I think we got their position. Committee Chair Chock: We are pretty close. Council Chair Rapozo: It is whether you agree or not. It is that simple. Councilmember Yukimura: Is this from Allan? Committee Chair Chock: Yes, that is what I think it is. It is whether or not you believe it should be there or not. That is how I read it. Council Chair Rapozo: If you believe the Kaua`i Watershed Alliance is sufficient for the upper watershed, fine. Committee Chair Chock: And should be the sole entity for that and in actuality, I will state my position. I read it differently, and now I am a little bit concerned about it as I had spoken earlier. Councilmember Kawakami. Councilmember Kawakami: I do not think it is as simple as that, as if you just believe that there should or should not be community-based. I think we need to know the merits of the idea. This is not just, "Oh, if you think the Kaua`i Watershed Alliance..." The Kaua`i Watershed Alliance has been doing great work with the nature conservancy as far as these landowners all going up there for the preservation of the upper watershed. I want to know if they feel like there is another layer of input that needs to happen. But we have been working with the Kauai Watershed Alliance for a while now with the State with their "The Rain Follows the Forest" project. I want to know if there are shortcomings or if there is a lack of communication. I do not know if there is...it is not that easy. Committee Chair Chock: For me, as I mentioned at least from my perspective, I know where their focus is and it is the upper watershed. I reached out SPECIAL PLANNING 120 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING to them as we have developed and looked at the restoration of watersheds at the middle and makai and they are separate for them. That is kind of where I am, at least I know, based on my experience and working with this discussion is that they do not exist elsewhere. I appreciate it. I think that we could have that discussion and maybe that is what they want, but from what I have understand that their kuleana is not all watersheds. Councilmember Kawakami: Well then somebody should explain it to us and not just say that here is Option "A" and Option `B" and it is whether you believe in Option "A" or Option `B." We want to vet this thing. Committee Chair Chock: I agree. Councilmember Yukimura. Councilmember Yukimura: It says, "Regarding the establishment the of watershed task force," not sure this needs to be specifically in this section... which was, I think, the mid-range ...as it should be considered for all sections. I do not hear them saying that they do not want a watershed task force. I am hearing them say that they do not want it for just one (1) section of the ahupua`a. But rather than any of us just speculating what it means, why do we not take the time to talk to them and really understand what their position is and why? I think there might be a consensus about a watershed task force, but we do not know until we talk to them. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. I look to hear from anyone else if that is where we want to go and I am happy to do so. Councilmember Kagawa: It is 4:30 p.m. Committee Chair Chock: For the record, what we will do is we will receive Items #24-30 at this time and we will come back. They can be reintroduced in January. Councilmember Kagawa moved to receive Items #24-30 for the record, seconded by Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Kawakami: I have discussion. Councilmember Yukimura: Alright. Committee Chair Chock: Please. Councilmember Kawakami: We are not coming back in January with a whole slew of new amendments, are we? Committee Chair Chock: That is the discussion we need to have right now. Councilmember Kawakami: I say this process has been a good process, but clearly towards the end of this whole amendment, there were some logistical SPECIAL PLANNING 121 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING challenges that we were faced with that we worked through. Now, if we are going to open it up for "Round 2" in January, we are going to be stuck in the same situation. Committee Chair Chock: Here is what I would like to suggest: there are two (2) decisions to make; the first decision is that we need a deadline for all amendments. My suggestion would make that deadline by the end of the year, so by January let. The second decision is we need to hear realistically, from each Member, what they intend to or how many they intend to propose. If they are big, then I also need to know that. That way, I can plan accordingly when we can actually realistically have a last round of amendments. Councilmember Kagawa: Do you want to go around the table right now? Committee Chair Chock: Yes. Councilmember Kagawa: Zero. Councilmember Kaneshiro: I will not have any amendments. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Councilmember Kawakami: I am not going to be introducing any amendments, because I think logistically, this is where we are falling into a lot of problems because of the Sunshine Law. We cannot even discuss them, so you will see none from me and I will just discuss what is thrown out. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Council Chair Rapozo: I thought today was the day. I thought this process, whether it goes into tomorrow or not, was going to be the only time for this and that was going to be it, and not come back in January with new amendments. Committee Chair Chock: I appreciate that and I would have loved to have done that, but the problem is that I made a request of a deadline and I received no responses. That is why I am faced with what I am faced with. I have to allow people the necessary time. We have had really a hard time with staff being able to catch up, so we cannot be, "Well, we will just take care of it now," because there is no way we can take care of it now. We have to look towards a future date at this point. Councilmember Yukimura, how many amendments do you anticipate having? Councilmember Yukimura: About eight (8). Councilmember Kawakami: Million? Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Brun. Councilmember Yukimura: I can accommodate that. Councilmember Brun: Zero. SPECIAL PLANNING 122 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Council Chair Rapozo: Real quick, our staff is going to have to go through all of the amendments that we just went through and find out and look if there is any kind of conflict or any kind of errors. I cannot see them doing that now and then come back in January and deal with eight (8) more amendments and have to go through that process one more time. We still have tomorrow and I do not want to come back either, but if we have amendments, let us get it out tomorrow. Committee Chair Chock: I guess the clarification is that we do not have amendments because we stopped the process for accepting amendments on Monday because the staff could not take on any more. That is why we are stuck with having to come back later, but not ready for tomorrow. That is why we are looking for a future date. I would love to have been able to get through all of time. Councilmember Kawakami: Mr. Chairman, I could support the proposal for you to just not accept any more amendments. I believe the process has been opened as far as giving the public enough time for input. It is been generous from our standpoint, as Councilmembers; we have had time to introduce amendments. I know that in your spirit of collaboration, you really want to reach out, but logistically and to get this thing done, I could support you just saying that the amendments that we are dealing with are the amendments we are dealing with and we are not taking any more. But I will leave that up to the discretion as your role of the Chair, but I could support just saying, "Hey, we are going to come back in January to deal with these few loose ends and that will be it." Committee Chair Chock: Just in terms of my position is that I am not entertaining any more outside amendments, if that is a clarification. Councilmember Yukimura: What do you mean by outside amendments? Committee Chair Chock: I am not looking at any additional amendments other than what I have on my list, that we are not...I have probably about five (5) in total, which includes these that we just decided to defer. We are talking about a total of eight (8), because Councilmember Yukimura has about eight (8). If the body is suggesting that what we want to do is not accept any more and not even look at the ones that we have already deferred, then that is one question. If we are talking about the twelve (12) total, then I am in support of doing the twelve (12). Councilmember Yukimura: What about the ones we have withdrawn for further work, like the Housing ones? Committee Chair Chock: That is what I am saying. Those are the ones that are on the table right now, which include the twelve (12) or so. Councilmember Yukimura: Okay. May I? Committee Chair Chock: Councilmember Yukimura. SPECIAL PLANNING 123 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Chair, I think I heard you say that this General Plan is so important that we will take the time we need to get through it and we all know that Planning took three (3) years to put it all together and we have only had three (3) months. So to have another month or another meeting...but I do not want it on the 3rd, because I do not think it is fair for staff, first and foremost, to have to work through the last two (2) weeks, the only two (2) weeks of the year that we do not have really any meeting or work and we all look forward to a Christmas vacation. I would like to have it either mid-January or the end of January; and one more meeting, but finish up what we have. We have been doing well with it. I think we have a process that has been very collaborative and we need to finish this work. We cannot just abruptly cut it off because people are tired. This is an important document. Committee Chair Chock: I would love to hear from everyone else. If it is the interest of this body to get through it before the end of the year, which is part of what I am hearing, then we could put another special meeting together for this, but it would be difficult to get it. Councilmember Yukimura: It is not fair. Committee Chair Chock: The feedback that I am getting from staff is that even if we went to January 1st for the deadline, and we could move that up, that we would not be ready by January 3rd to vet those. We could move that line up and do it on the 25th or so, but these people will be working through Christmas. It is kind of the timing of the year issue as well. Councilmember Kagawa: My suggestion is that the first committee meeting in January, normally, it is pretty light...normally, the first committee meetings of the new year...and we can take on the rest of the amendments...any new amendments at your discretion as Chair, I think I feel like Councilmember Kawakami, that if you want to take on the eight (8) additional amendments that she has, I support you. You have done a great job up to now and I am not going to take away your powers today. Committee Chair Chock: Any other comments on what we should be doing? Councilmember Brun: I do not know how many more amendments we can add to this thing. We are saying that we only had three (3) months—looking at the book on page 49, Councilmember Yukimura, it looked like you were involved in this for three (3) years. I think we had enough. Let us end this and vote on it in January. I just do not see us getting amendments after amendments. Councilmember Chock, whatever you want to do as Chair, I will support you. Let us just move forward already. Committee Chair Chock: Planning, I need you up here again. I am up against what the staff can actually realistically do. What I am being told is that they cannot get it done by January 3rd. That is the issue I have. SPECIAL PLANNING 124 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Councilmember Yukimura: Absolutely. That is cruel and unusual punishment to make them do that. Committee Chair Chock: So we can take it to the middle of January and do it at that meeting. It sounds like that is the closest one that we can do it at. Is that okay for Planning? January 18th? Mr. Dahilig: The only thing I would ask is that I know that if the timing does start to run into a committee meeting around the beginning of February, I know that my staff will be attending the Smart Growth Conference. Committee Chair Chock: The last meeting for this would be the mid- month committee meeting. That would be to clean up anything and take the last of the amendments. Mr. Dahilig: January 18th? Committee Chair Chock: January 18th. Hold on, I am consulting with staff. Staff is saying that January 25th is a good special committee meeting day to complete this. That is what they are telling me. Mike, is that okay? Mr. Dahilig: I guess that my only concern is if it is the 25th of January and it rolls over to the following council meeting for final reading, my staff is going to be gone...I do not know if there is a meeting on the 31st. Committee Chair Chock: It would be for second reading on February 7th. Would you be back by February 7th? Mr. Dahilig: Yes, my staff will be back by February 7th. Committee Chair Chock: Okay. Is that good for everyone? We are going to go for January 25th as the next meeting day to complete this. Any questions? If not, I just want to thank everybody for sticking with this. I know it was brutal and we went through so many different amendments. First, regarding Items#24 through #30 of Amendment #9 regarding the Kauai Alliance Watershed, we need to receive those. Councilmember Yukimura: And with the idea that they would be reintroduced after we find out the status. Councilmember Kagawa moved to receive Items#24-#30 of Amendment#9 for the record, seconded by Councilmember Yukimura, and unanimously carried. Committee Chair Chock: Motion passes. We will defer Bill No. 2666, the General Plan Update, to the January 25th Special Planning Committee Meeting. Councilmember Yukimura moved to defer Bill No. 2666 to the January 25, 2018 Special Planning Committee Meeting, seconded by Councilmember Kaneshiro, and unanimously carried. SPECIAL PLANNING 125 DECEMBER 14, 2017 COMMITTEE MEETING Committee Chair Chock: Tomorrow is canceled everybody. Merry Christmas. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Co iabalb`a Council Services Assistant I APPROVED at the Committee Meeting held on January 31, 2018: MASON K. CHOCK Chair, PL Committee ATTACHMENT 1 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER ARRYL KANESHIRO (By Request) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, as indicated in the "Amendment" column as shown in the chart below ( "Reason for Amendment" provided for informational purposes only): AMENDMENT (All non - substantive typographical and formatting edits proposed by the Consultant and staff) 1. Change reference to the General Plan 2017 to General Plan 2018. 2. Amend title page as follows: "[PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT] FINAL VERSION APPROVED BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL 2018" 3. Where possible throughout, correct the following Hawaiian place names, to appear as follows: • `Ele`ele • Ha`ena • Hanakapi`ai • Hanama`ulu • Hanapepe • Kalapak�. • Kaneiolouma • Kaumuali`i • Kealia • Ke`e • Mkiaola • K6ke`e • K61oa • Kuamo`o REASON FOR AMENDMENT (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) (NOTE: The Planning Department is in "Support" of all amendments.) Bill No. 2666 (General Plan Update) will not reach second and final reading and return from the Mayor by 2017. The document is no longer the Planning Commission Draft. When it is ultimately passed, it will be the final version approved by the County Council. 2018 is the anticipated year of approval. Some place names are not correct and /or are spelled inconsistently. Some examples on the following pages: • `Ele`ele (e.g., page 53) • Ha`ena (e.g., page 152, 153) • Hanakapi`ai • Hanama`ulu • Hanapepe (e.g., page 140) • Kalapaki • Kaneiolouma (e.g., page 148) • Kaumuali`i (e.g., page 140) • Kealia • Ke`e (e.g., page 42) • Kiikiaola (e.g., page 57, 67, 284, 355) • Ko-ke`e (e.g., page 140) • K61oa (e.g., page 161) • Kuamo`o (e.g., page 198, 273) 1of11 ATTACHMENT 1 • Kukui`ula • Kukui`ula • Lawa`i • Lawa`i • Ma`alo • Ma`alo (e.g., page 272) • Maha`ulepu • Maha`ulepu • Na-pall • Na-pall • Nawiliwili • Nawiliwili • `Oma`o • `Oma`o (e.g., page 77, 231, 243, 251, • Pakala 259, 267) • Po`ipu • Pakala (e.g., page 137) • Wailua • Po`ipu (e.g., page 140) • Waipa • Wailua (e.g., page 64, 175, 198, 225, 233, 235, 240, 244, 245, 248, 253, 256, 261, 264, 269, 273, 274(x2)) • Waipa (e.g., page 246, 254, 262) 4. Where possible throughout, add For consistency (e.g., page 27, Hawaiian diacritical marks where Figure 1 -4). missing. 5. Throughout, correct use of short Conventionally, the em dash is used for dashes ( " -" and " - ") used for spacing spacing and emphasis. and emphasis to appear as an em dash 6. Throughout, correct use of single Conventionally, single quotation marks quotation marks (` ') to appear as are used for quotes within quotes double quotation marks (" "), unless (e.g., page 123). quoting a quote. 7. Throughout, locate punctuation Convention (e.g., page 203, 220). within quotation marks. 8. Throughout, change "e.g." to "e.g.," (E.g., page 42.) 9. Throughout, correct backward `okina Backward `okina. (E.g., pages 161, 233, in "Ma`alo." 268.) 10. Throughout, correct backward `okina Backward `okina. (E.g., pages 198, 231, in "Po`ipu." 243, 251, 259, 267, 273.) 11.Throughout, correct backward `okina Backward `okina. (E.g., page 235.) in "Moloa`a." 2of11 ATTACHMENT 1 12.Amend page 202 as follows: Dashes needed. "Immerses 3 -4 year olds in Hawaiian language and provides curriculum through a cultural- and `ohana- oriented context." 13. Page 237 and throughout, change Reflects the site's most current name. "Aina Ho`okupu Agricultural Park" to "Kilauea Community Agricultural Center." 14. Amend page 89 as follows: "Residents (Same as immediately above.) desire more consistent sidewalks, path connections to the agricultural [park,] center, and coordinated multimodal trail options between North Shore communities and even between different [mokus.] moku." 15.Amend page 92 as follows: "Improve (Same as immediately above.) sidewalk, path, and trail connections between the Town Center, agricultural [park,] center, and beaches." 16.Amend page 167 as follows: "Support (Same as immediately above.) regional agricultural parks and centers." 17.On page 244, fix graphical glitch in Glitch; portion of map is missing. map. 18.On page 104 and throughout where Typographical error. two (2) or more actions are listed, change "A. PERMITTING AND CODE CHANGE" to "A. PERMITTING AND CODE CHANGES" 19. Change "ExtremeTsunami Zone" to Missing space between two words. "Extreme Tsunami Evacuation Zone" (E.g., pages 248 -254.) and make consistent with immediately below. 3of11 ATTACHMENT 1 20. Change "ExtremeTsunami Missing space between two words. Evacuation Zone" to "Extreme (E.g., pages 264 -265, 267 -270.) Tsunami Evacuation Zone" 21.Amend key of regional Hazard Maps, Kauai does not have more than one pages 249 -254, to change correctional center. "Correctional Centers" to "Correctional Center." 22. On page 280, change "Hawai`I" to Capitalization error. "Hawai`i." 23. On page 281, remove extra space at Typographical error. the beginning of reference #84. 24.On page 281, remove extra link Typographical error. underlining in reference #91. 25. On page 281, change "U.S" to "U.S." in Typographical error. reference #97. 26. On page 6 and throughout, change Per the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA), " `Alae Pa`akai" to " `Alaea Pa`akai" missing an "a" in `alaea. 27. On page 6, change "Ali`i is the high Per OHA, Ali`i Nui is the high chief chief." to "Ali`i means a chief." 28. On page 6, change "Heiau is a Pre- Per OHA, include indigenous /Native Christian place of worship . . ." to agency in the definition. "Heiau means a Native Hawaiian place of worship ..." 29. On page 6 and throughout, change Per OHA, no `okina necessary. " `Iwi" to "Iwi." 30.On page 6, change "Kanaka maoli o Per OHA, Kanaka Maoli should be Kauai is a Hawaiian native of capitalized when referring to a Native Kaua`i." to "Kanaka Maoli o Kauai Hawaiian person. means a Native Hawaiian of Kaua`i." 31. Throughout, change "kanaka maoli" Per OHA, Kanaka Maoli should be and "Kanaka maoli" to "Kanaka capitalized when referring to a Native Maoli." Hawaiian person. 4of11 ATTACHMENT 1 32. On page 6 and throughout, change Per OHA, kahak6 over the "i." "Kipuka" to " Mpuka." 33.On page 6 and throughout when Per OHA, no kahak6 necessary. referring to a "supernatural or divine power; a powerful nation, authority; privilege" change "Mann" to "Mana." When referring to the geographical place, retain "Mang." 34.On page 6, change "Mauka means Per OHA, as a direction this definition is mountain." to "Mauka means inland better fitting and now relates to the or toward the upland." definition of makai. 35.On page 6, change "Na Kanaka o Per OHA, Kanaka is a person. Kanaka Kauai is the plural of kanaka maoli o Maoli is a Native Hawaiian person. Na Kauai and means Hawaiian natives Kanaka o Kauai translates to "the of Kaua`i." to "Na Kanaka Maoli o people of Kaua`i." Kauai means Native Hawaiians of Kauai and is the plural of Kanaka Maoli o Kaua`i." 36. On page 6, change "Wahl Pana means Per OHA, wahi kapu is a sacred place, sacred place." to "Wahl Pana means while wahi pana (also being sacred) were legendary place." places noted in legend/stories. 37.On page 36, amend as follows: (Same as immediately above.) "Specific examples include endemic and endangered species, historic structures, archaeological sites, cultural traditions, beliefs, practices, stories, and [sacred] legendary places (wahi pana)." 38. On page 97, amend as follows: "This Per OHA, "[t]he use of `pre- contact' to view is embodied in the ahupua`a describe the era of Hawaii prior to the system, which was utilized across arrival of British Europeans undermines Hawaii in [pre- contact times.] i ka wa Native Hawaiian existence, kahiko (meaning "in old times /long establishment, and agency in the Hawaiian Islands. The use of `pre - ago /in the age of antiquity ")." contact' emphasizes European - settler presence as a point of origin for civilization and record, and discounts the si nificant and progressive advancement 5of11 ATTACHMENT 1 6of11 of Native Hawaiian society for centuries, if not millennia, prior to `Western contact. "' 39.On page 162, amend as follows: "In (Same as immediately above.) [pre- contact times,] i ka wa kahiko (meaning "in old times /long ago /in the age of antiquit yam'), a variety of lo`i terraces, dry -land agriculture, fish ponds, and salt pans supported a large population." 40.Amend page 31 as follows: "Currently, The County Charter states "a minimum the Open Space Fund receives [1.5] of one -half of one percent of the certified 0_5 percent of real property taxes and real property tax revenues . . ." Kaua`i can be used to acquire park land." County Code 1987, as amended states "a minimum of one -half of one percent (0.5 %) of the certified real property tax revenues ..." (Ordinance No. 986, 2015). 41. Amend page 209 as follows: "In [2017,] (Same as immediately above.) Fiscal Year 2017 -2018, the fund earned [1.5] 0_5 percent of the County's real property tax revenue." 42.Amend pages 15, 37, 41 and As discussed during the Special Planning throughout as follows: "POLICY #7: Committee Meeting on October 12, 2017, BUILD A BALANCED this edit was previously approved by the MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION Planning Commission. SYSTEM" 43.Amend page 266 "Figure 5 -31 Typographical error identified by Jean Hanapepe - `Ele`ele Public Facilities" Souza. by inserting the correct key for "Public Facilities" maps (see Figures 5 -29, 5 -30, 5 -32, 5 -33, 5 -34, and 5 -35). 44.Amend page 229 "Figure 5 -3 Technical edit identified by Jean Souza. Hanapepe- `Ele`ele Land Use Map" by rearranging the imaging to properly show the existing reference to "Hanapepe Town Park." 6of11 ATTACHMENT 1 45.On page 64, at the end of the Suggested edit for clarity via Planning Plantation Camps Place Type Department memorandum dated description, amend as follows: October 24, 2017, item 13, per Council request. "Plantation Camp. A fifth place type, the Plantation Camp, is a historic remnant of a former plantation housing camp that is not associated with a present -day center and is located in a rural area. This type is a cluster of houses with little or no retail or service uses. While other place types promote pedestrian - oriented development, the single -use nature of this place type results in an environment that is primarily auto - oriented, and would not be considered future areas of potential growth. Examples of plantation camps include Pakala Village, and Kaumakani on the West Side. The Plantation Camp coloring on the land use maps (Chapter 5) is intended as a descriptive place -type and is not a land use designation with specific land use policies." 46. On page 225 (Island Wide Map), page (Same as immediately above.) 227 (Waimea - Kekaha Map), and Page 229 (Hanap6pe- `Ele`ele Map) of the Land Use Maps, amend as follows: "Plantation Camp (descriptive only)" 47. On page 137, amend as follows: "The Existence of this additional plan was DOW Water Plan 2020 incorporated raised during the Special Planning housing unit and population forecasts Committee Meeting on October 26, 2017. from the 2000 Kauai General Plan. The DOW will update its Water Plan 2020 to a 2040 planning horizon after this General Plan is complete, incorporating updated housing unit and population forecasts. Additionally, DOW prepares a Water Use and Develo ment Plan." 7of11 ATTACHMENT 1 48.On page 176, amend as follows: Technical edit for sentence structure. "[Protections and measures in order to support families keeping their ancestral family lands, tax, and land use regimes impeding retention] Tax and land use regimes impeding families from keeping their ancestral lands should be revisited and revised accordingly." 49.On page 176, amend as follows: Technical edit for sentence structure to "Adopt policies for smoke -free cars provide clarity that "with keiki" only with keiki, beaches, parks, and applies to "cars." condos[, and cars with keiki.]_" 50. On page 209, amend as follows: Technical edit for sentence structure. "Given the limitations of the fund, there is also an opportunity for the Commission to work with the State and non - profit organizations, such as land trusts, [and the State] on collaborative projects that will increase public access to Kaua`i's special places." 51. Amend page 114 as follows: "Reducing Typographical error. the Cost of Living by Connecting Housing, Jobs, and [ Transporation] Transportation" 52.Amend page 118 as follows: "Housing Typographical error. units near agricultural operations reduce commuting time and deter vandalism and theft through increased [ survelliance.] surveillance." 53.Amend page 119 as follows: "The 2008 Typographical error. DHHL Lessee Survey (prepared by SMS Research) found [prevalant] prevalent issues on homestead lands: overcrowding, aging infrastructure and homes, and the inability of 8of11 ATTACHMENT 1 homesteaders to finance expansion and repairs." 54. Amend page 155 as follows: "Directing Typographical error. growth and [infrastrcture] infrastructure investment within or adjacent to town centers will generate economic activity for small businesses." 55. Section 2.4.5. Page 84. Reformat the Formatting. header "Natural Hazards and Climate Change Resilience in East Kauai" so the entire text of the header is at the top of the text column on the right side of the page (or is otherwise together). 56. On page 151, amend by deleting item Per the Department of Parks & C.7 ( "Develop prototype designs for Recreation, these designs are completed. new facilities such as restrooms and pavilions in order to shorten design and implementation times, and standardize repair and maintenance. ") and renumbering the following items. 57. Change on page 216 and throughout Typographical error (the intention is once "biannual" to "biennial." every two years, not twice every year). 58. Amend page 219, Objective #42, Draft Typographical error. measure: "[Decrese] Decrease in emissions 59.Allow editor to add, remove, and Authorizes editor to make technical consolidate Index of Terms (page 283- changes as needed, and as other 287) references as needed (e.g., amendments may add or remove "community plan" and "Community references found in the Index of Terms. Plans "). 60.Amend page 130 "Update Typographical error. maintenance facilities to continue [maintainence] maintenance of the bus fleet." 9of11 ATTACHMENT 1 61.Allow editor to address consistency of Authorizes editor to make technical text headers throughout. E.g., changes as needed for consistency. page 65, section 2.4.1, the first header reads "Preliminary Vision & Priorities" whereas on page 70, section 2.4.2 the first header reads "Preliminary Vision and Priorities for Hanapepe- `Ele`ele." Page 66, section 2.4.1 the Land Use Map Changes header reads "Land Use Map Changes for Waimea - Kekaha" whereas on page 71, section 2.4.2 the Land Use Map Changes header reads just "Land Use Map Changes." 62. Page 196: "[In improving the built Technical sentence structure edit. environment, it is particularly important that we prioritize vulnerable populations, such as the keiki and kupuna who are most in need.] When improving the built environment it is vital that the wellbeing and health of vulnerable populations, such as our keiki and kupuna, are considered." 63. Page 179: "KIUC aims to increase this Addition of recent new development. percentage to 70 percent by 2030 through a mix of new biomass, solar, and hydroelectric projects. In 2017, Tesla partnered with KIUC to construct a solar farm on Kauai: outfitted with Tesla Powerpacks, this facility will reduce fossil fuel comsumption by approximately 1.6 million gallons per year." 64. Page 184: "[We must study our island Technical edit for clarity. systems and how they function, so that we can find ways of reducing or substituting fossil fuel use.] We must analyze our island energy facilities and infrastructure to identify ractices ands stem u rades that 10 of 11 ATTACHMENT 1 work toward reducing fossil fuel consumption." 65. Page 192: "[Assess the need for and Technical edit for clarity. make shelter facilities accessible to special needs groups, pet owners, and unique local conditions.] Assess the need for specialized accommodations at shelter facilities to improve accessibility for special needs groups and pet owners." 66. Page 170: "Support programs and Technical edit for clarity. initiatives that encourage manufacturing and support Kaua`i's [maker economy.] small -scale independent manufacturers." 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, as indicated by the handwritten edits contained as shown in Attachment 1. 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by adding larger versions of maps for each district contained within Figure 3 -11 (Kaua`i Visitor Destination Areas), with figure renumbering as needed, as shown in Attachment 2. 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by replacing Figures 5 -1, 5 -2, 5 -3, 5 -4, 5 -5, 5 -6, and 5 -7 with the maps that include contours as shown in Attachment 3. 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, to repair printing glitch as shown in Attachment 4. 6. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored. Other amendments as noted.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12 -13- 2017) \Consultant Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for Consultant_dmc.docx 11 of 11 KAUAIKAK KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN a » ✓✓ The theme of this General Plan is'�Caua'i KAou' This theme recognizes that everyone must work together to define and implement a shared vision for our island. Planning Commission Draft June, 2017 Fivia! ve►-sion Appmve.J by -!-L-P- Coun +y Couhci I a.oig This plan is dedicated in memory of Louie Abrams (1952 - 2016), former Planning Commissioner and eternal believer in making Kauai a great place to live. 1 3 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Citizen Advisory Committee Bill Arakaki Kurt Bosshard Bev Brody Helen Cox Luke Evslin Robert Farias, Sr. Randall Francisco Laurie Ho Brenda Jose Sue Kanoho Cammie Matsumoto Mark Oyama Gary Pacheco Barbara Robeson Tom Shigemoto Stacy Sproat -Beck Susan Tai Kaneko County Council Mel Rapozo, Council Chair Ross Kagawa, Council Vice Chair Mason K. Chock, Planning Committee Chair Arthur Brun Arryl Kaneshiro Derek S.K. Kawakami JoAnn A. Yukimura Gary L. Hooser (former) KipuKai Kuali'i (former) Planning Commission Kimo Keawe (Chair) Louis Abrams Kanoe Ahuna Donna Apisa Roy Ho Wayne Katayama Wade Lord Sean Mahoney Glenda Nogami - Streufert Mayor's Office Mayor Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr. Managing Director Wallace Rezentes, Jr. Managing Director Nadine Nakamura (former) Planning Department Michael Dahilig, Director Ka'aina Hull, Deputy Planning Director Marie Williams, Planner Leanora Ka'iaokamalie, Planner Marisa Valenciano, Planner Lee Steinmetz, Transportation Planner County Agency Partners Elderly Affairs County Attorneys Economic Development Emergency Management (formerly Civil Defense) Fire Housing Liquor Control Parks & Recreation Police Public Works Engineering Building Wastewater Solid Waste Transportation Water State Agency Partners Department of Land and Natural Resources Department of Health Department of Transportation Consultants SSFM International, Inc. (Prime) Opticos Design.,lnc. Economic & Planning Systems Charlier Associates, Inc. Collaborative Economics Marine & Coastal Solutions International, Inc. PBR Hawaii Raimi & Associates University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program Ruby Pap, Coastal Land Use Extension Agent Unless otherwise noted, all photos provided by Planning Department staff. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 5 GLOSSARY OF HAWAIIAN WORDS AND PHRASES The following list provides Hawaiian words and phrases, and their corresponding definitions, used throughout this document. The translations are taken and adapted as necessary from Ulukau, the Hawaiian Electronic Library, available online at http: / /wehewehe.org /. Ahupua'a is' a land division usually extending from the uplands to the sea, so called because pualx the boundary was marked by a heap (ahu) of., -' stones surmounted by an image of a pig (Pua'a), or o because a pig or other tribute was laid on the altar £ as tax to the Chief. The boundaries of an ahupua'a is abased on the region's watersheds. :41ae Pa'akai is sea'salt'enriched with minerals. Aina means land, earth. Aina Ho'opulapula are homesteading lands. 11i'i is the high chief. Aloha means affection, compassion for others. Heiau i§ 'a Pre - Christian place of worship, shrine; some heiau were elaborately constructed stone platforms, others simple earth terraces. Hoa 54ina means tenant or caretaker, as on a kuleana. 'Iwi means bone; core (as of a speech). The bones of the dead were considered the most cherished possession and hidden. Ka Po'e Kahiko means People of Old. Kekou means we (inclusive, three or more), ours, promotes synergy when developing solutions and alternatives. ✓ Kama'aina iTS a Native -born, one born in a place, host. wtieahs i✓ Kanaka Taoofi o Kauai is,a Hawaiian native of Kauai. C 1.4_ s� �r $ -eAV)S Kapu means forbidden, sacred. Keiki is a child or children. Kipuka is a variation or change of form (puka, hole), as a calm place in a high sea, deep place in a shoal, opening in a forest, openings in cloud formations, and especially a clear place or oasis within a lava bed where there may be vegetation. Konohiki i "s the headman of an ahupua'a land division under the chief; land or fishing rights under control of the konohiki; such rights are sometimes called konohiki rights. Kuleana means right, privilege, concern, responsibility. KOpuna are elders. Lo'i is an'irrigsted terrace, especially for taro, but also for rice; paddy. Lo'i kalo is a taro (Colocasia esculenta) terrace. L6kahi means collaboration or teamwork, unity, agreement. yea► -� s Maka'ainana are people that attend the land. Makai means toward the ocean. 1451ama'4ina means caring for the land. Mana is supernatural or divine power; a powerful nation, authority; privilege. Mana'o means a thought or belief. Mauka means mountain. Moku is a traditional land division representing a district or section typically encompassing several ahupua'a. KauaTs moku include Puna, Kona, Ko'olau, Halele'a, Na Pali, and Ni'ihau. pali Mokupuni is an island. Na Kanaka o Kauai is the plural of kanaka maoli o Kaua'i and means Hawaiian natives of Kaua'i. 'Ohana is a family, relative, kin group. 'Olelo means language or speech. Pali means cliff. Paniolo means cowboy. Wahi Pana means sacred place. 6 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN i GLOSSARY OF HAWAIIAN WORDS AND PHRASES J wA��a9�YnLV��r P q<hicy (�-or zrlj Civil Dcfuise) IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ISWMP Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan FITS Intelligent Transportation System W IWS Individual Wastewater Systems KCC Kaua'i Community College /VoTE: �K-CDA Kaua'i Civil Defense AgEmzrl o"4'''10"" KCHA Kaua'i County Housing Agency KCHII Kaua'i Community Health Improvement 4, Initiative Y�KEDB Kaua'i Economic Development Board KESP Kaua'i Energy Sustainability Plan IT KESRP Kaua'i Endangered Seabird Recovery Project KHPRC Kaua'i Historic Preservation Review ZCommission KIUC Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative KPAA Kaua'i Planning and Action Alliance KTP Kilauea Town Plan KTS Kapa'a Transportation Solutions Study KTSP Kaua'i Tourism Strategic Plan 2016 - 2018 Update KVB Kaua'i Visitors Bureau KWA Kaua'i Watershed Alliance LCP Lihu'e Community Plan LESP Land Evaluation and Site Assessment LGBTQ Lesbian - Gay - Bisexual Transgender -Queer LOS Length of Stay LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan MGD Million Gallons per Day MLTP Multimodal Land Transportation Plan MMA Major Market Area MMT CO2EQ Million Metric Tons of Greenhouse Gas Emissions NAICS North American Industry Classification Syste m NIMS National Incident Management System NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NSPA North Shore Path Alternatives OCCL Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands OTD Offer to Dedicate PASH Public Access Shoreline Hawai'i PDR Purchase of Development Rights PHEV Plug -in Hybrid Electric Vehicle PMRF Pacific Missile Range Facility PTSA Parent Teacher Student Association R &D Research & Development RPS Renewable Performance Standards SHPD State Historic Preservation Division SKCP South Kaua'i Community Plan SLR Sea Level Rise SRTS Safe Routes to School SMA Special Management Area SNAP Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program SOV Single Occupancy Vehicle SPA Special Planning Area TAM Technical Assistance Memorandum TDR Transfer of Development Rights TVR Transient Vacation Rental TVU Transient Vacation Unit UDP Urban Design Plan USDA United States Department of Agriculture VDA Visitor Destination Area VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled WSPA West Side Path Alternatives 8 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 11 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS GLOSSARY OF TERMS The following list, in alphabetical order, provides definitions for planning terms used throughout this document. Boundary Amendment means changes to the Hawai'i State Land Use District boundaries. Boundary amendments are approved by the State Land Use Comission. mean s Built Environment cefe sr all physical parts of our communities, such as buildings, streets, infrastructure, and parks. Community Plan is a public document that provides specific proposals for future land uses, developments, and public improvements in a given community within the County of Kaua'i. In the 2000 General Plan, Community Plans were referred to as -'Development Plans'. Community Plans are intended to be region specific and capture the community's vision for the area. �tow�muniry Fiar's meavis Plates Cottage Industry fifers to) a business or manufacturing activity carried on in a person's home. Design Standards are specific regulations, such as form base code, within Special Planning Areas. Design Standards are intended to help to achieve the vision and character that is desired by the community. Development means any building, construction, renovation, mining, extraction, dredging, filling, excavation, or drilling activity or operation; any material change in the use or appearance of any structure or in the land itself; the division of land into parcels; any change in the intensity or use of land, such as an increase in the number of dwelling units in a structure or a change to a commercial or industrial use from a less intensive use; any activity that alters a shore, beach, seacoast, river, stream, lake, pond, canal, marsh, dune area, woodlands, wetland, endangered species habitat, aquifer or other resource area, including coastal construction or other activity (APA Website, 2016). Development Permits (Land use and building permits collectively) means any written approval or decision by a local government under its land development regulations that gives authorization to undertake some category of development, including but not limited to a building permit, zoning permit, final subdivision plat, minor subdivision, resubdivision, conditional use, variance, appeal decision, planned unit development, site plan, certificate of appropriateness, and zoning map amendment(s) by the legislative body (APA Website, 2016). Development Standards means specific regulations, such as lot coverage, building height, and setbacks that guidethe placement of development perzoning district. For example, Residential Development Section 8 -4.4 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO) Standards states single family detached dwelling units are subject to density and acreage limitations. Entitlement is ari' approved permit issued by the County of Kaua'i to use or develop land. Includes subdivision approval, zoning, variance, special use, and PDU permits. Food Miles Travelled means the distance food travels from where it is grown to where it is consumed. Good Agricultural Practices means voluntary audits that verify that fruits and vegetables are produced, packed, handled, and stored as safely as possible to minimize risks of microbial food safety hazards (USDA Website, 2016). Houselessness means lack of housing. Individuals who are houseless lack permanent housing, and may live on the streets, in shelters, in abandoned buildings or vehicles, or any other unstable or non- permanent situation (NHCHC Website, 2017). GLOSSARY OF TERMS 1 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 9 Housing Unit means a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or, if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters (SMS Research, 2016). Infill Development means building within existing communities. Infill development can expand housing inventory without consuming open space. Landscape Guidelines are design and maintenance guidelines that improve the quality, safety, and cost - effectiveness of street landscaping. They also can be used to aid design standards to achieve the vision and character that is desired by the community. Makerspaces are-'collaborative shared spaces where people gather to create, invent, and learn using technology, hardware, and tools. Missing Middle Housing means housing located within walking distanceto shops and amenities, filling the gap between single - family homes and apartment buildings (Opticos Design Website, 2017). Multi - Family Housing means there are two or more housing units within a single building, or there are separate housing units within one housing complex. Provisional Area is an area on the Land Use Map to be defined and designated via a future Community Planning process due to the sensitivity of its potential regional impact. The regional Community Planning policy, once adopted by ordinance, is considered consistent with this plan. Single - Family Housing means a building consisting of only one dwelling unit designed for or occupied exclusively by one family. Subdivision means the division of land or the consolidation and resubdivision into two or more lots or parcels for the purpose of transfer, sale, lease, or building development. The term also includes a building or group of buildings, other than a hotel, containing or divided into two or more dwelling units or lodging units. 10 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 11 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Tsunami Evacuation Zone means any area that should be evacuated when there is a tsunami warning present, as mandated by the Kaua'i C -ivit Defense Agency (KCDA-�. These areas are typically a minimum of 100 feet away from inland waterways and marinas connected to the ocean. Zoning Amendment means changes or additions to the County of Kaua'i CZO. Section 8 -3.4 of the CZO states amendments may be made whenever public necessity, convenience, and general welfare require IVTE an amendment. °' cspac_e_ Walkshed is a quarter- to a half -:mile radius walking distance or a comfortable walking distance between locations. QZ rn 'c NOTE: rGrnove, space %inv'a Pir '" ,,, d '!- Cov►�ovm G►.,arc� -1 G,vo.�gL,o�+t �� dou.•mev�+ Figure 5 -9 Waimea - Kekaha Heritage Resource Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 ,/ Figure 5 -10 Hanapepk- 'Ele'ele Heritage Resource Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 Figure 5 -11 South Kaua'i Heritage Resource Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 Figure 5 -12 Uhu'e Heritage Resource Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 Figure 5 -13 East Kaua'i Heritage Resources Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 Figure 5 -14 North Shore Heritage Resource Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 Figure 5 -15 Kaua'i Island Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 Figure 5 -16 Waimea - Kekaha Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 v' Figure 5 -17 Hanap6pe:- 'Ele'ele Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 Figure 5 -18 South Kaua'i Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 Figure 5 -19 Lihu'e Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 Figure 5 -20 East Kaua'i Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 Figure 5 -21 North Shore Hazard Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 Figure 5 -22 Kaua'i Island Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 Figure 5 -23 Waimea - Kekaha Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 Figure 5 -24 Hanapepe'- 'Ele'ele Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 Figure 5 -25 South Kaua'i Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 Figure 5 -26 Lihu'e Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 Figure 5 -27 East Kaua'i Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 Figure 5 -28 North Shore Infrastructure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Figure 5 -29 Kaua'i Island Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 Figure 5 -30 Waimea - Kekaha Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 Figure 5 -31 Hanap6p&,= 'Ele'ele Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 Figure 5 -32 South Kaua'i Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 Figure 5 -33 Lihu'e Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 Figure 5 -34 East Kaua'i Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 Figure 5 -35 North Shore Public Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 NOTE: reftov' Figure 5 -36 Kaua'i Island -Wide Transportation Mac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 Figure 5 -37 Kaua'i Island Transit Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 12 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN FIGURES TABLES TABLES I KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 13 Table 1 -1 Kaua'i County Population, Island -Wide and By District (1990 -2035) . . . . . . . . .28 Table 1 -2 Housing Unit Demand, Forecast to 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Table 1 -3 Job Growth, Forecast to 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Table 1 -4 Visitor Arrivals, Forecast to 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Table 2 -2 Major Changes by Planning District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60 Table 2 -3 Actions & Resources Consulted for Land Use Map Updates . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63 Table 3 -1 Summary of Goals and Sectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96 Table 3 -2 State Parks on Kaua'i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Table 3 -3 2016 Average Daily Visitor Census by Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 Table 3 -4 Hawaiian Immersion Charter Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 Table 4 -1 General Plan Objectives and Draft Performance Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 K u ! -e-kn O V-9- Table 5 -1 Kaua'i Island Transportation Roadway Map Keb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 Table 5 -2 Priority Transit Capacity Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 TABLES I KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 13 POLICY #16: PROTECT ACCESS TO KAUATS TREASURED PLACES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 POLICY #17: NURTURE OUR KEIKI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 POLICY #18: HONOR OUR KUPUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 POLICY #19: COMMUNICATE WITH ALOHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 51 2.1 FUTURE LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS .......................... 54 2.3 MAP IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 2.4.1 WAIMEA - KEKAHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 ✓�o �: �Q�`' 2.4.2 HANAPEPEj 'ELE'ELE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 2.4.3 SOUTH KAUA'I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 2.4.4 LIHU'E . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 2.4.5 EAST KAUA'I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 2.4.6 NORTH SHORE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 95 I. THE WATERSHED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 1. Wao Nahele -The Upper Watershed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 2. Kahawai - Middle Watershed, Drainage, and Freshwater Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 3. Kahakai - Coastal Areas and Shorelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 4. Threatened and Endangered Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Ill. HOUSING ........ ............................112 1. Affordable Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 2. Infill Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 3. New Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 4. Agriculture Worker Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 5. Hawaiian Home Lands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 6. Elderly Housing and Assisted Living Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 7. The Houseless Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 8. Impact of Resort Uses on Housing Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 III. LAND TRANSPORTATION .......................... 123 1. General .................... ............................125 2. County Roads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 3. Transit Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 4. Pedestrian Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 5. Bicycle Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 6. Parking Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 16 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 POLICY MAPS 223 5.1 OVERVIEW .... ............................... 223 5.2 FUTURE LAND USE MAPS .......................... 224 5.3 HERITAGE RESOURCE MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 5.4 HAZARD MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 5.5 INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS .......................... 255 5.6 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAPS .......................... 263 5.7 TRANSPORTATION MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 6.0 REFERENCES 277 APPENDICES 291 Appendix A - Progress Report on the 2000 General Plan .......... 291 Appendix B - The Approach & Public Process to Develop this General Plan295 Appendix C - Growth Trends and Projections ................. 315 Appendix D - Sea Level Rise Maps ....................... 327 �-� Appendix E -Land Ownership and Availability for Future Growth..... 355 Appendix F Entitled Projects by District ................... 365 4X ep �o ya Appendix G - Action Matrix ........................... 381 18 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 ,r P O s w 0 2 From top left: Hanalei taro fields, North Shore District; Brennecke's Beach, South Kaua'i District; Kaua'i paddlers; Traffic on Kuhio Highway near Kapa'a, East Kaua'i District. Kaua'i is at a Crossroads KauaTs beautyQfound in its expansive beaches, striking landscapes, and cultural diversity - enriches the lives of its people and draws visitors from around the world. The spirit of aloha imbues our rural lifestyle and spiritual connection to the land and ocean ,- making our way of life unique and unhurried in an increasingly fast -paced world. However, throughout the General Plan's public process, many expressed that "times are tougherthan ever" and that quality of life is burdened by KauaTs unresolved issues. Voices in the community have expressed frustration towards previous plans that have not been implemented, and towards instances of deferred action on the part of government. Kaua'i remains vulnerable to overdependence on tourism while the challenges of traffic and housing impact everyone. Our rural infrastructure, aging and with limited capacity, appears to be at a tipping point. There are needs, sometimes competing, in areas like environmental preservation, economic prosperity, traffic congestion, and community health. Concerns brew over agriculture lands, access to education, water quality, social equity, and invasive species. Looming on the horizon is global climate change and its potential effects on our communities, health, and economy. These threats have cast pessimism over whether Kaua'i's treasured identity can be preserved. It's clear the island is at a crossroads on an array of issues. Many attribute this sense of vulnerability to a common source: growth. Growth is Happening Whether We Like It or Not The need to manage growth is the primary driver behind long range planning. A successful plan relies on the community's ability to accept factual circumstances, assess future challenges, and craft coherent solutions. However, a recurring theme was the desire to limit growth even though recent population growth has exceeded the 2000 General Plan's projections. Our island's growth continues regardless of the desire to see it lessen. However, under - planning our future leads to inadequate infrastructure, an increase in illegal land I INTRODUCTION 19 uses, and a community that continues to evolve under the weight of more people. Some have suggested legislating policies like limiting family size or restricting the right to travel to Kaua'i, but such methods of population control are unconstitutional. Growth is projected to continue to increase throughout the next twenty years at an approximate rate of one percent a year. Both natural increase and in- migration cause growth, but the data also reveals a large out - migration of those born and raised here. Today, Kaua'i is at a juncture where we can either adequately plan for a future that can accommodate those who were born and raised on the island, or we can continue to see the efflux of our kama'aina leaving for a more feasible life away from home. When faced with this dilemma, the community has shown a strong desire to implement the necessary actions to ensure that the future of Kaua'i will provide opportunities fortoday's keiki. Therefore, the General Plan accepts this projected growth as a timely opportunity to cultivate collaboration and positive change. In this light, the challenge is to ensure growth benefits local residents and also addresses today's pressing concerns. One such concern is KauaTs housing crisis. Approximately 9,000 homes are needed by the year 2035 (see Appendix Q. The ability of our keiki to pursue a livelihood at home will depend on our ability to adequately address and correctthe decline of available and affordable housing. To further complicate matters, any home that is built on Kaua'i can be bought and sold on the global market. These competitive forces often outpace the needs of local residents who continue to become increasingly disenfranchised overtime. The Urgency of Planning for KauaTs Future A trend reversal in the type of growth our island sees will largely depend on the outcome and implementation of plans like this one. The General Plan is a call to arms, making the tough decisions to steer us on the right path. But collective agreementto make hard choices relies on accurately representing the community tenor and ensuring solutions have buy -in. Therefore, the public process placed great effort on "listening" rather than "telling" Democracy relies on diverse views and respectful discourse, and the General Plan follows in that tradition. At the beginning of the process, many 20 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN were apprehensive about future change. However, the dissemination of baseline data about current ' conditions and trends, derived from a series < s. of technical studies, built a common pool of 5 understanding so discourse could occur. Thousands of residents touched the process in one way or another, through small group meetings, open house events, pop -ups, surveys, visioning workshops, classroom lectures, contests, and internet outreach (see Appendix B). A Citizen Advisory v Committee (CAC) -to the administration'. helped test presumptions and policies. Keiki, college students,--, r large landowners, and agencies were all engaged. Ind short, the mana'o of everyone with a stake in Kaua'i's future was sought and welcomed. Upon this foundation, the General Plan sets in place a vision, policies, objectives and actions to guide County decision - making and partnership efforts over the long term. It describes how we will manage projected growth while preserving our most important resources, places, and qualities. A Vision Grounded in Reality Communities concurred thatthe 2000 General Plan's vision was still relevant. But they also noted where accomplishments fell short of the vision, things that need "fixing ", and the failure to work on weaknesses. Faced with this dilemma, updating the General Plan was layered with questions of what is appropriate to change, to emphasize, and to prioritize. It was agreed upon that the General Plan should create clear policy, measures of progress, and a system for evaluation and accountability. As a result, the General Plan identifies 19 key polices to guide growth and includes a discussion of each policy's rationale and intended outcomes. An actions chapter, tied to the policies, is added along with an expanded implementation chapter. With these changes, the General Plan will continue to serve as the County's premier document in managing growth and providing guideposts for the future. Kauai Kakou: Moving Forward Together KauaTs strengths lie in both the individual and collective sense of independence and kuleana that its people share. We must rely on one another, address challenges head on, become more self - sufficient, and protect the physical environment and culture that make Kaua'i special. Figure 1 -1 County Planning System Kaua'i General Plan Functional Plans Community & • Water Special Area Plans • Transportation • Wastewater • Solid Waste Development Standards Capital • CZO Improvements • Subdivision Program • SMA the functional plans set long -term policy directing development of the land use ordinances and the Capital Improvements Program. The General Plan sets forth the policy direction for the County through written policies. Spatial policies are depicted on the Future Land Use Map (Section 5.2) and other maps. Policy is elaborated through the more detailed community plans, zoning, and land use regulations. Community & Special Area Plans establish more detailed policy and maps that are specificto a certain community or geographic area and establish the basis for zoning controls that are unique to the area. Functional Plans analyze alternatives and establish policy regarding the future development of specific systems and facilities. Both community plans and public facility plans are strategic in character. They define and set forth strategies and courses of action, often involving resource commitments and physical improvements. 24 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) includes County expenditures and action prioritiesfor a rolling six -year period. It also establishes a financial plan and a general schedule for project implementation. Regulatory Ordinances and Administrative Rules including the Comphehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO), the Special Management Area (SMA) Rules, and the Subdivision Ordinance, set standards for land uses, as well as procedures and criteria for deciding discretionary permits. The CZO and other land use regulations elaborate on General Plan and Community Plan policies. The regulations translate policies (both maps and text) into specific terms, such as permissible uses, building heights, and other requirements. Zoning Amendments apply to a particular land parcel or group of parcels. The General Plan Land Use Map in Chapter 5 shows only general land uses for an area. Zone changes translate these to the parcel level on the County Zoning Maps in Chapter 5. At the time of zoning, decisions need to be made concerning a wide range of issues, including but not limited to the following: the potential effects on the use and character of surrounding lands; the specific location of commercial and residential areas; the densities of development; the road system; and the adequacy of infrastructure and community facilities. Site development and construction regulations such asthe building code, grading ordinance, andthe drainage standards play a significant role in guiding land development and maintaining environmental quality. 1.1.3 GENERAL PLAN FRAMEWORK The theme of the General Plan, Kaua'i Kakou, acknowledges that KauaTs strength lies in its strong, diverse community and the ability to work together to provide a better future. The plan's framework represents KauaTs approach to managing future growth and unifies the vision, goals, policies, objectives, actions, and maps. The General Plan Framework is illustrated in Figure 1 -2. The five elements of the framework are described below: Vision and Goals - The vision and goals are aspirational in nature. They describe KauaTs ideal and desired state by the year 2035. The vision for Kaua'i is organized by four overarching goals identified through the community process. topics easily and also communicates how the General Plan should be used. Responsible parties and policy conformance for each action is shown in the action matrix (Appendix G). Policy Maps - Six maps illustrate the policy of the General Plan. The Future Land Use Map is the spatial representation of how Kaua'i should accommodate and manage future growth. The other maps support the Future Land Use Map and include Heritage Resources, Hazards, Infrastructure, Public Facilities, and Transportation. Implementation Program - By nature, the General Plan is a high -level guidance document and implementation will require moving forward on several levels of the planning system and across many existing programs. The General Plan's Implementation Program is designed for accountability and transparency, and includes evaluation, monitoring, and reporting elements. Performance measures provide a means of assessing progress in relation to the General Plan vision, goals, and policies. Chapter 4 covers performance measures and monitoring in further detail. Together, the implementation elements create a feedback loop, thus allowing the General Plan to be a living document which can be amended in a timely manner if need be. Figure 1 -3 Key Growth Trends (2015 -2035) POPULATION GROWTH C4 PER YEAR {� l l 88,013 70,717 y OF GROWTH IS y NATURAL INCREASE (BIRTHS - DEATHS)e UP FROM OVER 65 2015 35 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 26 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1.2 PUBLIC PROCESS 1.2.1 BACKGROUND DATA AND KEY GROWTH TRENDS To plan for the future, an assessment of existing conditions and trends must first occur. Phase I of the General Plan Update included the development and integration of six technical reports to serve as the Plan's data foundation and to inform policy development: 1. Socio- Economic Analysis and Forecast (2014) 2. Land Use Buildout Analysis (2015) 3. Infrastructure Analysis (2015) 4. Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment (2014) 5. Important Agricultural Lands Study (2015) 6. Community Health Improvement Plan (2014) A summary of the technical reports is provided in Appendix C. Key growth trends related to defacto population, housing, and jobs are described below. Since 2000,the County grew by over 12,000 residents - from 58,463 residents to 71,000 in 2015. To the year 2035, Kaua'i will continue expanding its resident and visitor population base, thus increasing the demand for new housing and jobs. Total population for the County is projected to increase to 88,013 by 2035 (Table 1 -1). This represents an increase of 22 percent between 2015 and 2035, or approximately one percent a year (Figure 1 -3). Although growth is spurred by both natural increase and in- migration, the forecasted growth rate is lower and more stable compared to previous decades. Changing demographics suggest an aging population with limited ability to maintain the levels of natural growth experienced in the last two decades. The housing unit forecast is a function of the total population and assumes that housing production will respond to demand. To accurately determine demand, household size was forecasted on the planning district level. As with population, the Lihu'e Planning District is likely to see a larger increase in total housing units than the other districts (see Figure 1 -4). Assuming stable household size, the 2035 total housing unit forecast is 39,676 (see Table 1 -2). This represents annual growth of approximately 1.2 percent per year. - UICLV)J -WiC r?.. Table 1 -1 Kauai County Population, IslandPVVide and By District (1990 -2035) Table 1 -2 Housing Unit Demand, Forecast to 2035 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 County of Kaua'i 51,676 58,463 67,091 74,693 83,328 88,013 Lihu'e 11,169 12,507 14,683 18,017 21,595 23,456 South Kaua'i 9,600 10,545 11,696 13,623 15,737 16,855 Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele 3,873 4,362 6,157 6,463 6,860 7,094 Waimea - Kekaha 4,698 5,660 5,561 5,901 6,323 6,566 North Shore 5,913 6,605 8,002 8,286 8,686 8,933 East Kaua'i 16,192 18,784 20,992 22,403 24,128 25,110 Table 1 -2 Housing Unit Demand, Forecast to 2035 Table 1 -3 Job Growth, Forecast to 2035 Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 County of Kaua'i, Total Units 17,613 25,331 29,793 33,553 37,519 39,676 County of Kaua'i, Available Units 16,985 21,398 24,915 28,085 31,379 33,169 County of Kaua'i, Occupied Units 16,253 20,370 23,240 25,902 28,788 30,349 Average annual growth rate 4.4% 1.8% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% Table 1 -3 Job Growth, Forecast to 2035 Table 1 -4 Visitor Arrivals, Forecast to 2035 Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 County of Kaua'i 25,250 26,550 28,150 31,900 34,000 34,900 Average annual growth rate 0.51% 0.60% 1.33% 0.66% I 0.53% Table 1 -4 Visitor Arrivals, Forecast to 2035 28 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 County of Kaua'i (x 1,000) 1,229 1,075 1,033 1,150 1,270 1,330 Change this decade -13% 3.8% 11.3% 10.4% 4.7% Average annual rate of change -1.3% -0.4% 1.1 /° 1.0 /° ° 0.9 /° 28 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1.2.3 BALANCING POLICYAND PLANNING FOR ACTION The public process garnered positive feedback concerning the 2000 General Plan's well- crafted vision and values. However, many did point out weaknesses in the previous General Plan's ability to identify effective mechanisms for managing growth and to provide the public and decision makers clear implementation guideposts. Further, the tenor and character of public comments tended to congregate around what was wrong with their community, what needed to be fixed, or where government failed them. add ; d4vihg -H•,is process The issues raised by the public Adid not differ significantly from those facing the community before the turn of the millennium. However, the sense of urgency and concern is noticeably different - reflecting a heightened sense of frustration at how many issues have become exacerbated overtime. In response, the plan clarifies policy and direction built upon the still -valid foundational community values in the 2000 General Plan: • Protection, management, and enjoyment of our open spaces, unique natural beauty, rural lifestyle, outdoor recreation and parks. • Conservation of fishing grounds and other natural resources, so that individuals and families can support themselves through traditional gathering and agricultural activities • Access to and along shorelines, waterways, and mountains for all. However, access should be controlled where necessary to conserve natural resources and to maintain the quality of public sites for fishing, hunting, recreation, and wilderness activities valued by the local community. • Recognition that our environment is our economy, our natural capital, and the basis of our economic survival and success. • Balanced management of our built environment, clustering new development around existing communities and maintaining the four -story height limit. • Diverse job and business opportunities so that people of all skill levels and capabilities` can support themselves and their families. • Government that supports and encourages business. 30 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN • Balanced economic growth development that promotes providing good jobs and a strong economy, without sacrificing our environment and or our quality of life. • Respect and protection for the values and rights of our many cultures, in compliance with our laws and responsibilities as citizens. • Preservation of our cultural, historical, sacred, and archaeological sites. • Appreciation and support for the traditions of the Native Hawaiian host culture and the many other cultural traditions and values that make up the Kaua'i community. • Appreciation and support for the visitor industry's role in preserving and honoring all cultures and their values as KauaTs leading source of income and as a supporter of community festivals, recreation, arts, and culture. • Protection of KauaTs unique character. • Recognition of the uniqueness of our communities, supporting people with roots and history in those communities to continue to live and raise their families there. • Safety for all citizens and visitors. • Support for our youth, educating them to succeed. • Broad participation in the public process. The General Plan keeps paramount KauaTs values that focus on what we have in common rather than what separates us, threads the values through overarching policies, then implements policy through clear actions. Concerns were raised that a focus on problems created in the past would leave aside detailed and deep discussion on the policies needed to move us forward. Another concern was that an emphasis on actions may draw away attention from a firm policy foundation to guide decision - making. In response, the "Policies to Guide Growth" section discusses the rationale behind the policies and provides insight toward how each item is meant to move us forward. Further, the actions by sector contain objectives that are clearlytied for consistency to the policies. Kaua'i residents widely agree that sustainability should drive planning for the future. This recognizes that KauaTs natural environment provides the foundation for a sustainable and equitable society, which in turn creates and supports a sustainable economy. The 2000 General Plan broke ground toward recognizing sustainability goalsforthe County, but this General Plan is the firstto adopt it as an overarching goal. Sustainable development does not endanger the natural systems that support life: air, water, soil, and living organisms. It means meeting the basic needs of society and extending to all people the opportunity to satisfy their aspirations for a better life. It means integrating economic and environmental considerations in policy and decision - making? A key concept related to sustainability is managing growth without depleting the natural environment. Many feel the island is near or at carrying capacity with regard to resources, such as parks, roads, and public infrastructure. There is also concern that KauaTs natural resources and ecosystems are being irreversibly stressed or depleted. Addressing these issues sustainably means frankly assessing the existing conditions and identifying the tools and resources available to provide for their sustainable use and protection into the future. There is a common desire to manage or limit growth, visitor traffic, and development on Kaua'i. There is agreement that growth should be concentrated around existing centers to promote efficiencies in 1 Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Develop- ment, 1987 infrastructure while preserving open space and contributing to health. Adequate infrastructure should be provided to support current and anticipated needs. A sustainable society is one with a strong and diverse community fabric, where people of all ages, origins, economic status, and abilities co -exist and thrive. They share a desire to strengthen communities to withstand economic and environmental pressures and provide for needs from keiki to kupuna. A sustainable economy requires increased self - reliance for food, energy, and other resources. This means each individual taking the responsibility, or kuleana, to reduce their ecological footprint in their own lifestyle and land use. Sustainability also means recognizing the County's role in the largerworld. For example, sustainability isthreatened by global climate change, and Kaua'i must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and adapt in ways that are sensitive to the environment. Local sustainability efforts are strengthened by statewide initiatives and partnerships. In 2008, the Hawaii 2050 Sustainability Plan was finalized. In 2014, the County became a signatory of the Aloha+ Challenge, a statewide commitment to achieve integrated sustainability goals by 2030. The program's priorities include clean energy, local food production, natural resource management, waste reduction, smart sustainable communities, and green workforce and education. The General Plan's sectors and performance measures align with and support these priority areas. The United Nations Brundtland Commission defined sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." - United Nations, 1987 Community Voices "In the words of Edward R. Murrow, American,, journalist, 1908- 1965:4he- obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes a little longer. Well, we have waited too " long already, so let's design and build a ('Self- sufficient and Sustainable Kaua'i for the people of Kaua'i.�And yes, we not only can be a model for the rest of the state, country, and world, we SHOULD BE, we owe it to our children and future generations!" � l i Kaua'i Kakou art contest entry 1.3 VISION AND GOALS 1 7.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 33 I Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well -being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. Source: World Health Organization, 1946 Health is influenced by the built environment, including the quality and affordability of housing; ability to walk or bicycle to key destinations; accessto education, health care, and publicservices; availabilityof healthy foods; and access to the recreational areas that support active lifestyles. Healthy communities are also multi - generational, supporting the needs of all from keiki to kupuna. Community health is strengthed by locally grown food, compact walkable communities, preservation of natural areas, and access to jobs that support a high quality of life. 0) Resilience refers to the ability of a system to absorb disturbance and d still maintain its basic function and 7 structure. Source: Walker and Salt (2006) Z Resilient communities understand their strengths and vulnerabilities, and have resources and networks that enable self - sufficiency in respondingto changes. Having weathered multiple disasters, KauaTs residents have a heightened awareness of the need to prepare for and recover quickly from disruptive events. This awareness is an assetthat can be employed in planning for other hardships due to climate change or economic fluctuations. Self- sufficiency is another aspect of resiliency. This includes increasing local food production and crops for fuel and fiber. It means transitioning to renewable energy sources rather than relying on imported fossil fuels. It means hardening key infrastructure and siting it and other development away from vulnerable areas overtime. Resiliency also requires strong community fabric. Factors that erode community fabric include: the high cost of living; loss of opportunities for youth; residents priced out of the housing market; lack of common gathering areas; and sprawling development which weakens ourtown centers. The General Plan addresses these concerns through policies and actions for revitalizing towns and encouraging affordable housing. Finally, resilience needs a strong and diverse economy. Workers must have accessto living -wage employment and opportunitiesforadvancement. Kaua'i's heavy reliance on the visitor industry, from the number of jobs supported by visitor spending to the percentage of real property revenue generated from resort uses_ - is considered a threat to resilience. The General Plan's policies and actions support renewal, rather than expansion, in the visitor industry, strengthening of the agricultural sector, and economic diversification. Well Community Voices "The plantation camps should be used as a community model where safety, health, and welfare can be provided in a planned community: • Community rules are formed and adhered to. • Dispensaries and child caring centers can be established. • Yurts or tiny homes on decks can be used and when more room is needed, smaller units. • Porta potties are used and water must be brought in by residents or catchment systems used. • On demand water heaters are used if there is water provided by county. Solar if not." "Emphasize the relevance between the importance of being self - reliant and self - sustaining, along with the ways in which the essence of aloha becomes possible - to take care of ourselves, each other and our environment for generations to come!" Kaua'i Kakou art contest entry 1.3 VISION AND GOALS 1 1.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 35 I U U h 1 ti Z Opportunity is about equal access to a high quality of life, which includes adequate housing, employment, and pathways to upward mobility. Perhaps the greatest challenge to opportunity is KauaTs high cost of living, often called the "Price of Paradise." There is great concern that the cost of living has pushed local families away from Kaua'i, and keeps many families in or near poverty. The majority of new and available housing is not affordable to the averageworking household.This has also led to a sense that development contributes to inequality by serving off- island interests. When transportation and electricity costs are factored in, the average Kaua'i household spends more than 60 percent of its income on housing and transportation. Some residents manage the high cost of living through supplemental backyard food production, hunting, fishing, and multiple jobs. Others turn living rooms or garages into bedrooms for long -term guests and extended family. Still, the number of houseless individuals and families on the island is increasing, and many more are at risk of becoming houseless. Those unable to manage the costs become the working poor, continually in "survival mode" - or they abandon Kaua'i and seek opportunity elsewhere. Reversing this trend means ensuring that Kaua'i residents, regardless of factors such as geographic location, age, race, gender, and economic status, have access to housing that is adequate, employment that can sustain their needs, essential services, transportation options, 36 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN and opportunities for recreation and enjoyment of shared spaces. It means making sure that planning and land development decisions do not unfairly burden disadvantaged groups. It means encouraging and celebrating diverse, mixed income neighborhoods. It means providing for workforce housing in new growth areas and areas to be redeveloped. It means providing access to services and opportunities in rural communities so that the people there can maintain their desired lifestyle while meeting their needs. This General Plan includes policies that will help Kaua'i provide opportunity for its people from keiki to kupuna. This will require creative thinking, collaboration, and collective action in the spirit of Kaua'i Kakou. J Kaua'i Kakou art contest entry Community Voices "I believe that most of the long term Kauai residents are more concerned with the issues of opportunity and challenges faced by their children, resolving infrastructure issues, housing opportunities for the less affluent local community, cost of living, etc. In other words, survival. If the only house you can afford is a black and grey apartment in Princeville, yet your job is in Lihu'eC-'you're stuck wasting four hours per day in traffic. It's our development patterns that guide our addiction to cars, not the other way around." 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH Nineteen policies address the issues most important to Kauai residents in the face of existing issues and future growth. The policies guide objectives and actions and inform the Future Land Use Map. Manage Growth to Preserve Rural 1 Character 47 Provide Local Housing Recognize the Identity of Kaua'i's Individual Towns and 3 Districts Make Strategic Infrastructure 5 Investments Uphold Kauai as a Unique Visitor Destination I/ Complete Kaua'i's Shift to 13 Clean Energy Reduce the Cost of Living 6 7 a F 7 Build a Balanced Transportation ^ System Help Business Thrive Preparefor Climate Change 14 uqp Nurture Our Keik 17 Help Agricultural Lands Be Productive 11 Respect Native Hawaiian Rights 15 and Wahi Pana 4 L 12 Design Healthy and Complete Neighborhoods Protect Kaua'i's Scenic Beauty Protect Access to Kaua'i's 16 Treasured Places i Honor Our Kupuna Communicate 18 19 with Aloha 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH 1 1.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 37 3 Iv° GENERAL PLAN POU0ES Nineteen policies articulate the County's path forward toward meeting the community's vision and goals of sustainability, unique character, resilience, and equity. The policies address the critical issues and opportunities identified through the community process. They are not listed in order of priority, as all are important. These policies were the subject of a community) wide survey that was completed by more than 1,000 respondents across Kauai, and indicated widespread agreement with the policy direction. Results of the survey are summarized in Appendix B. Each policy statement is numbered and accompanied by a heading and icon. The icons are used in Chapter 3 to illustrate policy consistency. 38 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN POLICY #1: MANAGE GROWTH TO PRESERVE RURAL CHARACTER Preserve Kaua'i's rural character by limiting the supply of developable land to an amount adequate for future needs. Prohibit development not adjacent to towns. Ensure new development occurs inside growth boundaries and is compact and walkable. Rural character is what makes Kaua'i a unique and beautiful place valued by residents and visitors alike. However, this character is threatened by low- density development occurring on agricultural lands that are non - adjacent to existing towns. This development pattern also increasestraffic — anotherthreatto Kaua'i's rural character. Because our population will grow, we need to manage growth in a way that is sustainable and preserves our character. By concentrating growth within or adjacent to existing towns, we designate where urban uses belong in order to better preserve agricultural lands and open space. Infill and compact growth in existing towns will minimize infrastructure costs and help maintain separation between towns. When combined with transportation improvements, compact growth can reduce traffic congestion by reducing the need for long trips in single occupancy vehicles, increasing walking and biking within towns, and improving access to transit. This policy is implemented spatially through the Land Use Map in Chapter 5 (Urban Edge Boundaries and amount of new urban district allocated to districts) and through actions for Housing, Land Use, and the Economy. POLICY #6: REDUCE THE COST OF LIVING Reduce the combined costs of housing and transportation, which consume more than 60 percent of Kaua'i's average household income. Do this by connecting housing to jobs and by providing a diversity of housing types and affordable transportation options. Whether it is reflected in the cost of housing, food, or transportation, our community continues to struggle with the "Price of Paradise." For example, according to the_US Census Bureau (2014) American Community Survey (ACS), 44 percent of all households are cost- "' burdened and the average Kaua'i household spends 36 percent of their income on housing costs and 26 percent on transportation costs. With employment wages relatively stagnant, coupled with the increasing price of basic necessities, housing and transportation actions must be aligned to improve equity and accessibility to these primary needs. This policy is implemented spatially in the Land Use Map and through actions for Housing, Transportation, and the Economy, and Opportunity and Health. J t a 0 J POLICY #7: BUILD A BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Reduce congestion conditions through strategic infrastructure improvements and increase multimodal transportation options. Community members have repeatedly highlighted congestion asthe County'stoptransportation concern and express that transportation infrastructure has not kept pace with development. Past studies and efforts have demonstrated that trying to "build our way" out of congestion through a focus solely on road widening and new roads is neither feasible nor sustainable, and threatens our unique rural sense of place. For example, the Hawai'i Department of Transportation (HDOT) has identified $3.1 billion in roadway projects for Kaua'i, but anticipated funding of $630 million over the same timeframe.' In other words, only 20 percent of the funding needed to complete these projects is anticipated to be available. The County's Multimodal Land Transportation Plan, adopted in 2013, provides a balanced solution that addresses the needs of all transportation users, including freight, cars, transit users, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Countyand State cooperation isneededtoimplement the highest priority projects that contribute most to managing congestion. This policy is implemented through the Transportation Map and Actions for Land Transportation, and the LT u'e and South Kauai districts. 7 Federal Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan forth e District of Kauai, 2014 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH 1 1.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 41 POLICY #8: PROTECT KAUA'I'S POLICY #9: UPHOLD KAUAI AS A SCENIC BEAUTY UNIQUE VISITOR DESTINATION Protect the island's natural beauty by preserving the open space and views between towns. Kaua'i is home to distinctive natural views and landmarks that define KauaTs sense of place for residents and visitors. Mauka and makai scenic views J y of places such as Wai'ale'ale, Kawaikini, Ke'e Beach, and Waimea Canyon needto be protected regardless of population growth, development, and other changes. Many of our natural landmarks also serve as important physical cues to help orient people at sea. Protecting our scenic beauty and natural landmarks will ensure that our island's historical significance and unique identity will be preserved overtime. This policy is implemented through the Land Use Map and actions for Heritage Resources. 42 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Protect the identity of Kaua-i's visitor industry by focusing on revitalization and limiting new resort growth only to existing Visitor Destination Areas. Reduce visitors' impacts on infrastructure and communities. Growth in the Average Daily Visitor Count leads to economic activity. However, with the advent of disruptive forces in our traditional notion of visitor accommodations (e.g.. transient vacation rentals, house sharing), and the inability to restrict travel due to federal constitutional rights, any permitted growth in the visitor industry needs to consider the negative impact it can have on our infrastructure and our communities. Many areas like Ha'ena, Wainiha, and Hanalei have had their community character dramatically altered as a consequence of non- traditional visitor industry operations encroaching on their way of life. This impact has left Kaua'i with a clear increase in traffic - an impact not sustainable to our island. With the tools that the county has at its disposal, legal methods of limiting the physical footprint of transient accommodation uses should be encouraged. This policy is implemented through the Land Use Map, and actions for the Economy, Housing and Shared Spaces. V�, S POLICY #10: HELP BUSINESS THRIVE Create and foster thriving commercial areas in Town Centers through improved infrastructure, civic space, streetscapes, updated zoning standards, and streamlined approval processes. In order to provide equity and opportunity for all, a focus on job creation and economic growth is necessary. Historically, economic growth has centered around the tourism industry, leading to overuse of the rural and natural areas that make Kaua'i a unique and beautiful place. Future economic growth should support existing town centers to become more vibrant hubs of commerce and promote opportunities for small businesses and cottage industries. Infrastructure, investment, and community - building efforts should be directed toward existing town center areas and provide ease of regulation for nascent enterprise. This policy is implemented through the Land Use Map and actions for Shared Spaces, Heritage Resources, and Economy. F A ' -1 -64� 4- Alk I �_* POLICY #11: HELP AGRICULTURAL LANDS BE PRODUCTIVE Support economic diversification and access to locally produced food by increasing the productivity and profitability of all forms of agriculture. Nurture small -scale farms, promote crop diversity, and form stronger public /private partnerships with farmers. The Hawaii Baseline Agricultural Study$ reported that only 21,494 acres of land on Kaua'i are being used for agriculture (out of approximately 136,908 acres within the State Land Use Agricultural District). Less than 1,000 acres of the lands in production are used to grow food crops, not including coffee. Having a productive agricultural system not only involves having lands available for farming, but creatingthe mechanisms necessarytosupportvibrant agriculture. While Kaua'i's people may have different opinions on what type of agriculture should be allowed, increasing agricultural production is crucial for food, resources, and economic sustainability, as well as to the cultural heritage and identity of the island. This policy is implemented through the Actions for Economy, and Opportunity and Health. 8 2015 UH Hilo /DOA 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH 1 1.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 43 POLICY #12: PROTECT OUR WATERSHEDS Act with the understanding that forests, biodiversity, and water resources are fragile and interconnected. Restore and protect our watershed from mauka to makai. The health of our island is the health of our community, and it starts with protecting our watersheds. The public has called the health of our watersheds into question, and the increasing threats of pollution and overuse are apparent. Recognition of our environment as a living system transcending land boundaries and physical walls should always be woven into our actions moving forward. Emphasis should be placed on actions that address the disproportional impacts of growth on our watersheds. Traditional approaches of land use and resource management promote our sense of place and also make environmental sense when seeking options that balance our growing community and the need to maintain healthy watersheds. This policy is reflected spatially on the Land Use Map and implemented through Actions for the Watershed. 44 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 4 POLICY #13: COMPLETE KAUA'I'S SHIFTTO CLEAN ENERGY cliwca.� clnc n9e Mitigate Ckjjate an and reduce system -wide carbon emissions by at least 80 percent by 2050 through deep reductions in energy use and by transforming electricity, transportation, and infrastructure systems toward the use of clean energy. Kaua'i's shift to clean energy is in line with the goals of being a sustainable and resilient island. By doing our part to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, we will help to prevent global average temperatures from rising. In 2007, Kaua'i contributed 1.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide gases, which primarily came from the combustion of fossil fuels for electricity, ground transportation, and air transportation.9 Although Kaua'i is leading the State in generating local renewable energy production (approximately 40% of our electrical demand), there is still much work to do in reducing the GHG emissions generated from the transportation sector. This policy is reflected in the Actions for Energy Sustainability and Public Safety and Hazards Resilience. 9 Hawaii Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 2007 POLICY #14: PREPARE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE Prepare for impacts to the island economy, food systems, and infrastructure that will be caused by Climate ange clirvlo�. +e. �l�ay�gy Climate change and resulting sea level rise (SLR) are evidenced and documented on global, national, as well as local levels. While data forecasts are in flux, the best available science for our island indicates we should plan for at least three feet of sea level rise. As an island with the majority of residences and activities located on or close to the coastline, it is important to provide direction to prepare our island for increased coastal hazards and their impacts to business, homes, roadways, drinking water, and ultimately health and safety. This policy is implemented through the Land Use Map and Actions for Public Safety and Hazards Resilience. POLICY #15: RESPECT NATIVE HAWAIIAN RIGHTS AND WAHI PANA Perpetuate traditional Native Hawaiian rights and protect public trust resources and cultural sites in all land use development and activities. Native Hawaiians have refined systems for sustainable stewardship and collaboration that honor the island's beauty and bounty as well as one another. These principles are still alive today through the language, stories, dance, and ceremonies of our native people. Malama'Aina, or caring forthe land, is ingrained within the fabric and language of Hawaiian culture. Also rooted within stories and traditions are the struggles and accomplishments of the Ka Po'e Kahiko, or the People of Old, valuing significance of place, the origins of things, safety, health, and cooperation. Our kanaka maoli o Kaua'i are a vibrant and integral foundation of our community, and their ancestral knowledge about the land and resources, how to care for one another, and customary gathering rights and traditions must be passed on to future generations. It is understood as a resident, native or not, that Na Kanaka o Kaua'i are treasures to be respected. This policy is implemented in the Heritage Resources Map and Actions for Heritage Resources. 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH 11.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 45 -s ti 7 Z POLICY #16: PROTECT ACCESS TO KAUAI'S TREASURED PLACES Protect access to and customary use of shoreline areas, trails, and places for religious and cultural observances, fishing, gathering, hunting, and recreational activities, such as hiking and surfing. The beaches, mountains, and other natural areas of Kaua'i are cherished by its people for recreation, physical, mental, and spiritual rejuvenation, and family and cultural connections. In addition, many community members continue to provide for themselves and their families through subsistence practices - whether fishing, hunting, or gathering of foods, materials, and medicines - `as it has been perpetuated for generations. Development pressures mauka and makai, as well as emergencies caused by visitors getting hurt in some of the places our residents otherwise know as kapu, threaten continued access to KauaTs most treasured places for fear of liability. Promoting collaboration, providing for local and visitor education, enforcing rules protecting access, and providing signage and wayfinding where appropriate, perpetuate the protection of natural resources and the Hawaiian value system of Mama 'aina, ma lama This policy is reflected in the Heritage Resources Map and implemented through actions for Shared Spaces and Heritage Resources. 46 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN POLICY #17: NURTURE OUR KEIKI Value youth as Kaua is most treasured resource. Provide them with safe communities, great schools and facilities, and financially sustainable jobs, housing, and transportation opportunities so they are able to seek livelihoods on Kauai. Kaua'i continues to see more births than deaths. However, the statistics also show the exodus of young people for greater opportunities. The loss of our next generation creates an unsustainable trend of population aging that could disproportionately cause economic and social issues over the long- term. Actions to promote education, housing, and economic opportunity are necessary to keep our keiki from permanently moving away from home. This policy is implemented through Actions for Health and Opportunity, Economy, and Shared Spaces. POLICY #18: HONOR OUR KOPUNA Prepare for the aging of Kaua -i's population through housing, services, and facility improvements that meet the needs of elderly households. KauaTs population is aging. About one third of KauaTs population will be 65 and over in 2035. In comparison to the other counties, Kaua'i has a relatively high median age and a higher percentage of older adults. Here on Kaua'i, kupuna are honored and cared for as they are the foundation of our families and communities. By supporting kupuna- friendly communities, kupuna will be able to age in place and live an active and independent lifestyle as long as possible. Many of our communities today are not conducive to an aging population because of zoning regulations that have separated neighborhoods and commercial uses to be accessible only by car. In preparing for an aging population, we must rethink our community design by including the needs of our kupuna. This policy is implemented through the Actions for Housing, Shared Spaces, Health and Opportunity, and Transportation. POLICY #19: COMMUNICATE WITH ALOHA Kaua'i's residents care about planning and decision - making. Government must share information, encourage input, improve public processes, and be responsive. During the update process, community members and agencies asked how implementation of the 2000 General Plan was monitored in order to determine accomplishments and challenges. Although there were many successes, feedback mechanisms and metrics were absent or not consistent. Tracking the many actions that support the policies that help us to attain our goals will take a thoughtfully crafted system with room to evolve. Establishing performance measures, monitoring progress, reinforcing accountability, and involving the community in the future of the island are integral to our success. This policy is implemented through the "Implementation & Monitorin Chapter of the General Plan. /VOTE: remove quoim4ioki nnaeks 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH 1 1.0 VISION, GOALS, & POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 47 V Hanapepe community lace ty ' workshop, Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele District place, — +ypisig Ko►kou The theme of the General Plan, Kaua'i a u, acknowledges that Kaua'i's strength lies in its strong, diverse community and ability to work together to provide for a better future. 1.4 POLICIES TO GUIDE GROWTH 1 1.0 VISION, GOALS, is POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE 49 Directing How Kaua'i Grows The Future Land Use Map, shown in Chapter 5, is the backbone of the General Plan and is a critical element in the State and County's land use and regulatory planning system. Map consistency is required for all boundary and zoning amendment actions. The map represents the development pattern needed to accommodate projected growth and support the 2035 Vision and Goals. The Map was updated through an in -depth public and technical process. Specific changes were based on community input obtained through visioning workshops, community meetings, and stakeholder consultation. Existing ' entitlements and legal rights were considered as well. Updated population projections determined ' the extent of new growth areas, while sea level rise, and other technical planning information informed whether or not certain areas are appropriate for development. The Future Land Use Map aligns with the General Plan's policy by directing growth to existing communities through infill and mixed - use development that provides a range of more affordable housing types. New communities, located adjacent to existing towns, will be designed to support housing for locals, a range of civic space, and the County's multimodal transportation goals. Consistent with the desire to limit growth north of the Wailua Bridge due to congestion concerns, the majority of growth is steered to the L-ihu'e and South Kaua'i Planning Districts. This also serves to reduce the cost of living by locating more housing near major job centers. Additional growth is allocated to the Waimea - Kekaha, Hanapepe - Eleele, East Kaua'i, and North Shore planning districts based on historic and natural increase trends. Building Upon Historic Settlement Patterns Prior to Western settlement, a complex system of land division existed across Hawai'i. An island, or mokupuni, was divided into several moku, the largest units within each island. Kaua'i has five moku and Ni'ihau represents a sixth. Moku were divided into ahupua'a, land sections that extended from the mountains to the sea. The size of the ahupua'a depended on the resources of the area. Each was a self- sustaining unit, with resources to provide for the local population, and sufficient surplus to allow for trade. Kaua'i embraces the concepts of moku and ahupua'a and seeks to perpetuate the names, symbols, and knowledge associated with them through education and signage. KauaTs towns were originally sited at harbors and Commercial area in Nawiliwili, LThu'e District 52 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN crossroads, some of which pre -dated the arrival of Europeans. During the plantation period, settlements included plantation camps centered on sugar cane fields. These places were built to a pedestrian - oriented scale that made it possible to get around on foot. The surrounding fields created a greenbelt that separated towns. This relationship between built areas and surrounding natural or agricultural lands heavily influences KauaTs rural identity. Even with the rise of the automobile and the trend of sprawling development patterns, the legacy of these walkable settlements are seen in K61oa, Hanapepe, Hanalei, Kapa'a, and other towns. Growth should be directed to revitalize, restore, and celebrate these towns as unique places that promote healthy economies and community life. Protecting KauaTs Rural Character KauaTs natural environment has always defined the character of the island. Its built environment consists of small, mostly rural communities separated by'; expanses of open space and working agricultural lands. Each community maintains a unique sense of identity and has features and qualities that its residents would like to see preserved. Each also has elements that can be improved upon. Shared challenges in KauaTs communities include preserving and restoring the vitality of neighborhood centers, providing local - serving goods and services, improving walkability and connectivity, and increasing opportunities for social interaction and employment. While L-ihu'e is widely seen as the appropriate urban center for the island, most people in outlying communities would rather not drive to Lihu'e fortheir daily needs. However, the current land use pattern of growth forces them to do so, adding to the burden upon the island's roads and infrastructure. Policies and development patterns supporting compact communities with vibrant neighborhood centers will reduce transportation impacts contributing to a sustainable future and help preserve the laid -back lifestyle that Kaua'i residents value. The Land Use BuildoutAnalysis (2015) indicates that if existing development trends continue, significant residential growth would occur on the agricultural and open zoning districts, and be comprised of predominantly single - family homes on large lots. Moreover, this growth would be focused on the North Shore and East Kaua'i planning districts, as it has over the past 15 years. Such development would exacerbate sprawl onto agricultural land, stress limited rural infrastructure, and increase traffic ultimately undermining KauaTs sense of rural character. The Future Land Use Map was developed to avoid and reverse these trends. By focusing development, uses, and density within and around existing towns, agriculture land and the open space between towns can be preserved. The strategy is to accommodate as much of the projected housing need within and adjacentto existing developed areas, and discourage new residential and resort development in areas not directly adjacent to existing communities. This means allowing and incentivizing increased density and infill within a five - minute walk of town centers. Supporting Compact Development and Growth Allocations Some communities have al ready taken steps to focus growth in their existing town cores through recent planning efforts. "Special Planning Areas" were established through the LTu'e Town Core Urban Design Plan (2010) and the South Kauai Community Plan (2015). Compact, mixed -use development is supported by place -based zoning codes which focus on building size, type, and location rather than use, particularly in neighborhood centers and new communities. The Land Use Map provides the framework for similar planning efforts to occur at the Community Plan level for other planning districts. The Future Land Use Map also manages growth through the spatial allocation of anticipated population and housing increases. The location and extent of new growth areas were determined through the population projections which assigns future growth to each of the six planning districts (refer to Chapter 1). Consistent with the General Plan's policies and the Lihu'e Community Plan (2015), 47 percent of future growth is allocated to the Lihu'e District. South Kaua'i will accommodate 26 percent of future growth. East Kaua'i, which is the most populous district, is projected to receive 13 percent of future growth. 14 percent of future growth is allocated to the remaining three districts_ North Shore, Waimea - Kekaha, and Hanapepe-Eleele, - to provide for natural population increase. (EIe'ele, 2.1 FUTURE LAND USE 12.0 FUTURE LAND USE 53 O� m 1Z c� ca A I m M 3 r r CL. s- 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The Future Land Use Map designations describe the desired type of land use in broad terms. All boundaries are generalized and do not carry the legal weight of metes and bounds. In many cases, more specific planning and regulatory action is required to refine and implement the map. Some previous designations have been carried through, but the policy for these designations may have changed. Other designations have been consolidated or modified into new categories. Designations were developed or updated based on an in- depth public process described in Appendix B. The twelve designations include: 1. Natural Areas designated as Natural have either limited development capacity or are not suitable for development due to topography, hazards vulnerability, sensitive resources, and other constraints. They include all State Land Use Conservation District lands and some County Open Zoning District land. These areas include the many ridges, waterfalls, river valleys, and rugged coastlines of the island that comprise its open spaces and scenic views. Very few residential uses are found in the Natural designation and are generally not encouraged. Actions for the Natural Designation are found in the following Chapter 3 sectors: The Watershed, Shared Kalalau Beach (pictometry) Spaces, and Heritage Resources. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map Natural replaces the Open Designation in the previous General Plan. The Open Designation included undeveloped natural areas as well as some areas that are vegetated but developed and actively managed, such as golf courses. 2. Agriculture It is the County's policy to preserve and protectAgricultural lands, particularly those of the highest quality. Therefore, Important Agricultural Lands (IAL) are also identified on the Future Land Use Map. Preserving agricultural lands contributes to self - sufficiency and helps preserve KauaTs rural character and lifestyle. Agriculture lands are held in reserve for agricultural purposes with little residential development. These areas range in scale from large agricultural fields to small diversified farms. While the 2000 General Plan acknowledged issues related to residential encroachment into agricultural lands, this development pattern continued to expand, especially on the North Shore and East Kaua'i. The General Plan 54 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Kalaheo (pictometry) recognizes that residential develop menton agricultural lands is an unsustainable trend, and emphasizes preserving agricultural lands in intact form while limiting other uses. When development does occur, it should be clustered so as to minimize the requirements for new infrastructure and the impacts on open space and adjacent land uses. Actions for the Agricultural _Designation are found in the following Chapter 3 subsections: Agriculture and Agricultural Worker Housing. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map The Agriculture designation was expanded to include those lands no longer designated Resort or Residential Community. It has also been modified to differentiate between Important Agriculture Lands (IAL) and non-]AL. 3. s Homesteads are existing low- density rural residential communities that were created in the early 1900s under the 1895 Land Act. There are numerous homestead lots, mostly within,.,,South Kaua'i and East Kaua'i districts, that have a residential community form. The Homestead designation allows for single - family dwellings even if the parcel is in the State Land Use Agricultural District. The State Land Use Law requires residential dwellings within the State Land Use Agricultural districtto be "farm dwellings," meaning that the occupant needs to earn income from agricultural use of the land.10 However, single - family dwellings are permitted on lots existing before June 4, 1976." Lands mapped as Homestead wailua Homesteads (pictometry) are included within this designation although the underlying zoning is agriculture because they are entitled to residential use and many parcels have long been developed with single - family residences. The policy for Homestead areas is to allow incremental buildout of existing areas, while limiting the development and dispersal of new homesteads and agricultural communities. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map The Homestead designation is new and was created to acknowledge existing rural community form of homesteads in Kalaheo, Wailua, and Kapa'a. 4. Neighborhood Center Neighborhood Center is a new designation focused on historic town cores and corresponds to existing or future areas appropriate for accommodating infill development and growth. Centers consist of a mixed - use core with a cluster of retail and service activity, civic spaces and primary destinations, along with residential uses. This core area can support an interconnected network of streets and blocks that encourage multimodal transportation access. Centers typically comprise a mix of detached and attached buildings between 1 -5 stories in height. 10 HRS §205- 4.5(a)(4) 11 HRS §205- 4.5(b) Koloa Town (pictometry) 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 55 Actions for the Neighborhood Center Designation are found in the following Chapter 3 subsections: Town Centers, New Communities, and Transportation. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map Neighborhood Center is a new designation. It updates the previous Town Center boundary and replaces Urban Center and Residential Community in some areas. The designation works with Neighborhood General to indicate existing and new mixed use centers where growth and revitalization should be prioritized. 5. Neighborhood General The Neighborhood General Designation applies to areas within a quarter mile, or five - minute walk, from Neighborhood Centers. This designation is intended for medium intensity mixed -use environments that support the town core with housing, services, parks, civic /institutional, home occupation, and commercial uses. Buildings in this designation are mostly detached, with some attached, 1 -2 stories in height that can accommodate a range of multifamily housing Itypes. Actions for the Neighborhood Center %D'esignation are found in the following Chapter 3 sectors: Housing, Shared Spaces, and Land Transportation. Kilauea Town (pictometry) Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map Neighborhood General is a new designation. It was designated overthe existing Urban Center and Residential Community designation where it was included within a quarter mile radius of Neighborhood Center. This included the Agriculture Designation in some areas. CA 6. Residential Community This designation indicates existing areas that are primarily residential with fewto no other uses.These areas are located outside the quarter mile boundary of Neighborhood Center and are no longer intended to be utilized as a growth tool to indicate areas of future development. The exception is the Lima Ola affordable housing project in 'Ele'ele. Instead, the majority of future residential needs are directed to the existing and proposed Neighborhood Center and Neighborhood General designations. Actions for the Residential Community D signation are found in the following Chapter 3 sectors: Housing and Shared Spaces. Hanapepe (pictometry) Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map In addition to being largely replaced by Neighborhood Center and Neighborhood General, Residential Community was removed from areas where it was not possible to accommodate compact and walkable development directly adjacent to existing towns. This includes areas west of Waimea Town, along Ala Kalanimaka in Koloa, on the Huleia Plateau in Puhi, and mauka of the Princeville Airport. All these areas have converted to Agriculture. 56 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 7. Urban Center The Urban Center (Designation has largely been replaced by Neighborhood Center and Neighborhood General. Urban Center is only applied in the L-ihu'e District, which is expected to absorb approximately half of the island's future growth to 2035. L-ihu'e contains multiple neighborhood centers with overlapping walksheds, creating a nearly continuous urban fabric. In this district, Urban Center is applied to urbanized areas that accommodate intensive urban uses and zoning such as general commercial and general industrial. Actions for the Urban Center Designation are found in the L-ihu'e Community Plan and the following Chapter 3 sectors: Shared Spaces and Housing. L-ihu'e (pictometry) Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map Previously, the Urban Center designation was applied to "centers of government, commerce and transportation that serve the entire County or a large region" In addition to Lihu'e, this included Port Allen and an area p, adjacent to Kapa'a Middle School. The Urban Center designation is replaced with Neighborhood Center 0' and Industrial in Port Allen, and Neighborhood Center andnGeneral in Kapa'a. The policy addressing Wailua- z Kapa'a Traffic and managing growth north of the Wailua Bridge influenced the decision to remove the swath L' of Urban Center from the area adjacent to Kapa'a Middle School. s 6 0 8. Resort o Entitled or partially entitled resort development could add morethan 3,000 resort unitstothe existing visitorunit inventory. Most of these entitlements have no expiration date. Given concerns regarding stressed infrastructure including roads, wastewater systems, and parks, the policy is to prohibit expansion of Visitor Destination Area (VDA), and where possible, to reduce VDA boundaries and remove Resort areas where entitlements do not exist. Many in the community desired a shift toward a "use it or lose it" approach toward resort development. Use it or lose it refuses lack of action toward entitling over the past few decades, indicates the market's ability LO start and absorb this type of product in that spatial location, or a developer's willingness to make forward Po'ipu(pictometry) progress toward utilizing the General Plan designation. Given this community desire, the General Plan Update reduces the island's total resort acreage. Actions for the Resort Designation are found in the Chapter 3 sector: Economy. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map w Consistent with the policy to not expand the Visitor Destination Area (VDA), Resort,- Designation was removed or reduced in unentitled areas (without County Resort Zoning or VDA) and where there was little community support for resort expansion such as Nukoli'i (Table 2 -1). Further restrictions are required on remaining` ✓ areas without entitlements, by policy in Actions by Sector VI Economy Section 1 Permitting Actions, to.ixtsure ✓ furtherance of the "use it or lose it" policy, and provide a short window for areas like Princeville and ,Kikiaola to either require the developer to commit investment toward using the areas as resort or it will revert to agricultural usage. �K +Kiaola 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 57 9. Industrial and Transportation These designations apply to areas that exclusively accommodate business, transportation, production - oriented, and light industrial uses. In general, these uses need to be buffered from surrounding land uses due to noise and other considerations. Lands within the Transportation designation are used predominantly for major shipping and transportation facilities including L-ihu'e Airport, Nawiliwili Harbor, and Port Allen Harbor. Actions for Industrial and Transportation are found in Chapter 3 sectors: Land Transportation and Critical Infrastructure. ... Y Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map The Transportation Designation was newly applied to Port Allen(pictometry) the Princeville Airport, which was previously designated Residential Community. The Industrial designation is new. Industrial applies to areas with existing Industrial zoning and includes potential Industrial areas such as the Olokele and Koloa mill sites. 10. Military The Military designation describes lands under the control of the U.S. Armed Forces. It is unchanged from the equivalent designation in the 2000 General Plan. Uses within the Military designation include residential, office, and various facilities related to the mission of the installation. The public is typically restricted from access. This designation is limited to the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Barking Sands. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map The Military designation is unchanged. 58 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Pacific Missile Range Facility (pictometry) 11. University Zone University Zone is applied to the parcels owned by the Kaua'i Community College (KCC), the island's only post- secondary educational institution. The designation acknowledges KCC's plans for expansion and that the area should provide facilities, housing, and usesto serve the student, faculty, and staff population. Actions for Access to Quality Education are found in Chapter 3 sector: Opportunity and Health for All. Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map -� The University Zone designation is a new designation _v on the General Plan Land Use Map. 3 I 12. Parks and Golf Courses y d WThe Park (Designation describes major active public and private parks. The designation includes state parks, regional and district parks, stadiums, linear parks, and beach parks. Actions for parks are found in Chapter �✓ A new designation is "Golf Courses ". Golf Courses were previously included in the Open- and Parks and Recreation designations. S.)) Actions for Shared Spaces are found in Chapter sector: Shared Spaces. gas well q5 Changes from the Previous General Plan Land Use Map All State and County parks, ihcluding the National Tropical Botanical Garden's properties in South Kaua'i, were included to the extent allowed by the scale of the map. A new designation is "Golf Courses ". Golf Courses were previously included in the Open 'and Parks and Recreation designations. Kaua'i Community College ( pictometry) Princeville (pictometry) 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 59 Table 2 -2 Major Changes by Planning District District Action Two areas4west of Waimea changed from Residential Community to Agriculture. Waimea - Kekaha Resort ;Designation changed to "Provisional" Resort'lo allow' for a community planning process to determine the appropriateness, scale, and extent for resort development in Waimea. desicmcAiohS Neighborhood Center and General (Designation added to both Port Allen and Hanapep6 Town to be consistent with Department of Hawaiian Home Lands(DHHL) plans and to connect Lima Ola to Port Allen. Agriculture designation changed to "Provisional" to allow for a community planning process. Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele 75 acres for planned Lima Ola affordable housing development changed from Agriculture to Residential Community. New Neighborhood Center and Neighborhood General added to Port Allen. Approximately 19 acres in Makaweli on existing mill site from agriculture to industrial. Neighborhood Center and General 'Designation applied to Koloa, Kalaheo, and Po'ipu Roundabout Area. Agriculture designation changed to "Provisional" to allow fora community planning South Kaua'i process. Small Town designation at Numila,& Lawa'i Cannery Large Town designation at Po'ipu Mixed Use Gateway. Residential Community removed from 60 acres above Weliweli Tract. Neighborhood Center applied to Lihu'e Town Core, Puhi Mauka, Isenberg Mauka, Hanama'ulu Town, and area in Hanama'ulu fronting Highway adjacent to Triangle (west of bluff) formerly owned by EWM A Real y z,,{�- v,�fi0hCk Portion of Nukoli'i redesignated from Resort to Agricultural. Lihu'e Addition of Urban Edge Boundary. Urban Center applied to surrounding Neighborhood Centers and within Urban Edge Boundary. Residential Community removed from areas along Ki u Road. Neighborhood Center /General applied to previous Urban Center in Kapa'a Town and added to a portion of Olohena Road near Kapa'a Town. Neighborhood General applied to previous Urban Center designation around Kapa'a Middle School. East Kauai Portion of area behind Coco Palms in the Flood Zone changed from Resort to Natural. New Neighborhood Center at Kapahi, Anahola Post Office, and Anahola Town Center (to match DHHUs Anahola Town Center Plan). Neighborhood Center and General Qesignation applied to Hanalei and Kilauea. Kilauea town center expanded to accommodate growth. Residential Community at Princeville Airport changed to Transportation. North Shore Residential Community mauka of Princeville Airport removed and changed to Agriculture. Resort designation makki of highway limited by Action AA. Permitting Actions and Code Changes under the Tourism subsection of the Economy sector. 60 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Table 2 -3 Actions & Resources Consulted for Land Use Map Updates Action Resources Consulted Consulted population allocations and buildout Land Use BuildoutAnalysis (2015) projections contained in the General Plan Socioeconomic Analysis & Forecasts (SMS Research, technical studies 2016) Confirmed or updated information on entitled County permit records lands and landowner plans Landowner interviews Incorporated information from South Kaua'i LThu'e Community Plan (2015) and Uhu'e Community Plans regarding areas of change and land use designations South Kauai Community Plan (2015) Applied placetypesand right -sized Neighborhood 'Ele'ele, General Plan Community Visioning Workshops Centers in Waimea - Kekaha, Hanapepe- (November 2015 and April 2016) East Kaua'i, and North Shore General Plan Infrastructure Study (RM Towill, 2015) Infrastructure Assessment for the General Plan Applied /overlaid information on hazard areas Update (SSFM International, 2016) and infrastructure to existing developed areas and future growth areas Kauai Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment (2014) NOAH Sea Level Rise (SLR) Viewer State and County GIS Hazard Layers Lihu'e Community Plan (2015) Updated and applied General Plan land use South Kauai Community Plan (2015) designations for areas outside Neighborhood Center and General areas General Plan Community Visioning Workshops (November 2015 and April 2016) Updated and applied General Plan land use designations for areas outside Neighborhood Kaua'i General Plan ( Kaua'i County, 2000) Center and General areas environment. Examples of rural crossroads include Kapaia in Uhu'e District and Oma'o in South Kaua'i District. Village. Located in less urbanized areas, small villages exist at the edge of the rural and urban condition. A village has a main street with surrounding residential areas; this, however, transitions quickly into agricultural uses and /or into the natural environment. Examples of small villages include Hanalei on the North Shore and Lawa'i in South Kaua'i. They are typically scaled to about the size of one neighborhood. ti 3 a v b • Small Town. Located in more urbanized areas, A large villages are made up of clusters of 2 -3 neighborhoods that can support a mixed -use environment. The mixed -use environment can be located at the intersection of multiple neighborhoods or along a corridor between multiple neighborhoods. Historic examples of small towns include Koloa Town in South Kaua'i and Waimea Town in Waimea - Kekaha. They are typically scaled to about the size of 2 -3 neighborhoods. • Large Town. Located in urbanized areas, large towns are made up of clusters of neighborhoods or villages that support a larger, more complex mixed -use environment. 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 63 Buildings within towns are often attached and may be up to four stories tall. Large towns are important centers, and are typically made up of four or more neighborhoods. Uhu'e and Kapa'a are examples of large town place types on Kaua'i. • Plantation Camp. A fifth place type, the Plantation Camp, is a historic remnant of a former plantation housing camp that is not associated with a present -day center and is Figure 2 -2 Planning Districts and Place Types s ='I ; Waimea i + J f " �' f� •..sue . Kekaha Waimea Pakala Kaumakani_ i Large Town Small Town >� Village Crossroads Plantation Camp Planning District Boundary 64 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN lage Han &•`E located in a rural area. This type is a cluster of houses with little or no retail or service uses. While other place types promote pedestrian - oriented development, the single -use nature of this place type results in an environment that is primarily auto - oriented, and would not be considered future areas of potential growth. Examples of plantation camps include Pakala Village, and Kaumakani on the West Side. Hanalei North Shore t- r anapepe F. 'Fle'ele East Kauai Uhu'e Anahola .a; Anahola* Town Center Kapahii .Kapa'a WeAka . Hanama'ulu Kapaia . Uhu'e Puhi i-;wd WII�III ►uth Kaua ' I( Kalaheo `Oma'o Lawa'i Koloa Numila Kukui'ula, r Po'inc 1 0 �Q Waimea Mill In advance of or in conjunction with the Community Plan update, it is recommended that a hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment for coastal hazards with climate change and SLR be conducted with particular focus on low -lying areas adjacent to the Waimea River, low -lying agricultural lands, beach - front properties, and Ki_kiaola Small Boat Harbor. Such an assessment should incorporate planning information depicting wave inundation and erosion impactsfrom SLR, which is currently being developed by researchers at University of Hawai'i and others for the State SLR adaptation report. The Needs Assessment also noted that the County may adopt requirements for flood hazard mitigation /adaptation that account for SLR hazards and are above and beyond the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)flood zones and the base floor elevations (BFEs), and limit or prohibit re- zoning of flood -prone agricultural lands. Actions for Public Safety and Hazards Resiliency point to the need to update the County flood program. Lastly, the Needs Assessment suggested that a sediment management plan be developed at Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, which is acting to trap sand against the east breakwall and exposing properties to the west to increased erosion and wave inundation. Such an action would require partnership with relevant State, Federal, and private property owners due to the multiple jurisdictions involved. Other Land Use Changes Two areas west of Waimea were designated as Residential Community in the 2000 General Plan. These are not connected to the existing community and therefore have been designated as Agricultural to be more consistent with the community's vision of focusing revitalization and development around the Neighborhood Center. The area adjacent to the Waimea Plantation Cottages 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 67 was designated Resort in the 2000 General Plan. No movement to entitle the property occurred since the previous General Plan. The Future Land Use Map converts this area to "Provisional Resort" This will allow a more intensive community process to determine if resort potential should be removed or retained to support economic growth on the West Side. Guidance for Community Planning The following goals and actions are preliminary and will help inform future community planning processes. 1. GOAL: Build on Kekaha's proud agricultural identity while maintaining the relaxed, country living atmosphere. A. REVITALIZE THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF KEKAHA AS A HUB FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITY. 1. Cluster new commercial and community activity within the Neighborhood Center along Kekaha Road near existing businesses. 2. Support community- driven revitalization efforts and programs. B. IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY AND MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY. 1. Better accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians along Kekaha Road by slowing traffic. 2. Construct sidewalks along important connector streets such as'Elepaio Road. 3. Improve multimodal connectivity to Waimea with a separated shared use path to enable easier bicycle access to Waimea's town center. 4. Enable a "park once and walk" environment in the town center by integrating parking and transit facilities nearby. C. CREATE TOURISM OPPORTUNITIES THAT CELEBRATE AND BUILD UPON KEKAHA'S AGRICULTURAL IDENTITY. 1. Support programs that encourage agro- tourism and value -added agriculture businesses. 2. Explore the redevelopment of the Kekaha Mill 68 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN site as an agrotourism and agrobusiness center that could include light- industrial and processing facilities, as well as markets, visitor facilities, and housing. eemove Spaces 11. GOAL: Ensure that Waimea�-tKekaha is resilient to ima and coastal hazards. CCugaie�huv�9e,- -- 1. Inadvanceoforin conjunction withtheCommunity Plan update, conduct detailed hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment for coastal hazards with climate change and sea level rise for Waimea - Kekaha when updated sea level rise, erosion rates, and wave inundation planning information is available. Assessment should include low - lying areas adjacent to the Waimea River, low - lying agricultural lands, beach -front properties, Kekaha Landfill, and Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor. It should also identify priority planning areas where resources and planning efforts need to be focused and identify how and where to use adaptation strategies such as accommodation, retreat, and protection, and should encourage relocation to safer areas. 2. Prohibit land use intensification in flood -prone agricultural areas. 3. Partner with relevant State, Federal, and private property owners to develop a sediment management plan for ikiao Small Boat Harbor. 111. GOAL: Continue to improve upon Waimea's ability to serve both residents' and visitors' needs. A. CONTINUE TO IMPROVE UPON WAIMEA'S HISTORIC CENTER AS A VIBRANT AND WALKABLE DESTINATION. 1. Explore ways to expand the central square and make it more pedestrian oriented. 2. Establish pedestrian- oriented civic and retail space at the former mill site at the west end of town. 3. Improve tourist amenities and access to the visitor information center. 4. Provide a variety of small -scale housing near the neighborhood center that is appropriate to the commu ity character and accommodates "aging in pla " e. VII/ FAM J MrAO VespaCC) 2.4.2 kA NAPEPCTLETLF Hanapepe Ele'el is the gateway to the West Side. As Kaumuali'i Highway turns south and descends from the uplands of Kalaheo, views of the ocean open up together with views of the Hanapepe River. The district includes Port Allen, one of the island's main industrial hubs, with a harbor, power plant, and solar farm. Hanapepe is also a priority development area for DHHL, who owns land west of the existing town. Their plans include development of approximately 250 house lots in Phases I and II, then developing 234 house lots in a later phase. Preliminary Vision & Priorities for Hanapepe - 'Ele'ele The vision and priorities are preliminary as they have not been examined through an in -depth community planning effort. They provide guidance for specific areas and will inform future community planning efforts. Hanapepe Hanapepe is an appropriate location for incremental change. Residents value maintaining the character and "soul" of the historic town, a thriving center for artists, craftspeople, small farmers, and small businesses. There may be opportunities to increase pedestrian and non - motorized connectivities across the neighborhoods. Incremental infill across the town may help to fill in "missing teeth" in the historic downtown, provide affordable housing options in a variety of forms consistent with the existing town character, and revitalize the western portion of Hanapepe Road. New infill in the town center would also sensitively provide for public and semi - public space that supports activities such as markets and special community events, and preserves important community character such as "mom- and -pop" shops. The State owns a significant amount of land along Hanapepe Road and has no plans for improvement. A revitalization plan for the area could be developed in cooperation with appropriate State and County agencies. Major connectivity opportunities are envisioned at the highway, along the river, and connecting to and along the coast. Safe crossings are a priority, especially for children traveling along Kona Road and Kaumuali'i Highway. Improved multimodal access to the shore is important, especially between Hanapepe Heights, Hanapepe Town, and Salt Pond Park. A shoreline trail connecting Salt Pond Park to Port Allen is a 70 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN HANAPEPE-'ELE'ELE Place Type: Small Town Character /Key Values: • Peaceful /Laidback /Sunny • Country/Rural /Small Towns • Welcoming rohana • Community Ohan /Closely -Knit • Local Style /Culture /Grounded Degree of Change: Incremental Hanapepe Town qq popular idea both as an alternate route and valuable recreational amenity for residents. Finally, improved riverside access could offer another attractive alternate pedestrian route through town and encourage recreational use of the river, maintaining the historic swinging bridge as an important destination for both visitors and residents. / The salt pans on P"u'olo Point are an ancient cultural site that still functions today. The recognized stewards of this valued cultural resource are the salt makers, who continue to cultivate pa'akai (sea salt) and mana e this resource The nearb Burns Field Port's current parking lot. Connectivity to this node is critical. It could be improved through better highway crossings and an alternate pedestrian /bicycle route paralleling the highway as new residential neighborhoods are added along 'Ele'ele's eastern edge. As Hanapepe and'Ele'ele evolve, public open space can be ocean and river views, access to coastal areas, and a possible regional open space network. Hanapepe, 'Ele'ele, and Port Allen can evolve individually, but the desire is that connectivity would g y increase among them. Airport (originally known as the Auxiliary Flying Land Use Map Changes Field at Port Allen Military Reservations) is used by The Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele Land Use Map is shown on commercial operators, and during emergencies by Figure 5 -3. Updates to Land Use Designations since the National Guard and the County Fire Department. the 2000 General Plan version are described below. The continued cooperation of the airstrip is a concern for residents, salt- makers, and others who question Neighborhood Centers and Walksheds the vulnerability of the airfield to coastal inundation. The Hanapepe Neighborhood Center designation In addition to the presence of the airstrip, vehicle matches the Town Center designation of the use on the beach and other activities may negatively 2000 General Plan with one exception: west impact the integrity of salt- making resources. = _' of ",Puol.o /Hanapepe Park Road the boundary is extended to incorporate all points of the 'Ele'ele 'Ele'eIe is also suited for incremental change. There is the opportunity for Port Allen and 'Ele'ele Shopping Center to connectto new residential neighborhoods (including the Lima Ola workforce housing project) as they develop over time. The Port and shopping center are recognized as a valuable node. There is an opportunity to consolidate parking and transit facilities for recreational users. If 'Ele'ele shopping center redevelops and expands, this can provide a key development and open space opportunity forthe Hanapepe Road /Kaumuali'i Highway intersection. A Neighborhood Center designation was also applied to the core parcels facing Waialo Road in Port Allen, differentiating the potential for mixed - use, pedestrian- oriented development along Waialo Road and the industrial and residential properties to the east and west, respectively. The Residential Community located to the west of the existing Hanapepe Heights area and owned by DHHL was downsized to reflect current DHHL plans. Port Allen Harbor 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 12.0 FUTURE LAND USE 71 Natural Hazards and Climate Change Resilience in Hanapepe-'Ele'ele The Hanapepe-'Ele'ele district, including Port Allen, is vulnerable to natural hazards, including marine and terrestrial flooding, wave inundation, erosion, and storms and tsunamis. All of these hazards are expected to be exacerbated by climate change and sea level rise, threatening residential, commercial, cultural, and agricultural activities. This calls for a need to employ resiliency strategies in community siting, design, and relocation. The Kauai Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment conducted a preliminary Sea Level Rise (SLR) Inundation Assessment and Needs for Hanapepe using "bathtub" still water flood modeling from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) sea level rise viewer (Needs Assessment). The inundation maps for the 1 -foot, 3 -foot, and 6 -foot SLR scenarios can be found in Appendix D. In advance of or in conjunction with the Community Plan update, it is recommended that a hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment for coastal hazards with climate change and SLR be conducted with particular focus on the Hanapepe River, Port Allen facilities, and Salt Pond. Such an assessment should incorporate planning information depicting wave inundation and erosion impacts from SLR, which is currently being developed by researchers at University of Hawai'i and others for the State sea level rise adaptation report. Members of the Hanapepe-'Ele'ele community are participating in a process to formulate a community - based emergency deisaster response plan as part of the State's Hawai'i Hazards Awareness and Resilience Program (HHARP). Other Land Use Changes Seventy-five acresforthe planned Lima Ola affordable housing development changed from Agriculture to Residential Community. Additional Residential Community was provided to connect Lima Ola to the Neighborhood General located in Port Allen. Guidance for Community Planning The following goals and actions are preliminary and will inform future community planning processes. 72 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1. GOAL: Ensure that Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele is resilient to Climate Change and coastal hazards. In advance of or in conjunction with the Community Plan, conduct detailed hazard, risk, and vulnerabilityassessmentforHanapepe when updated sea level rise, erosion rates, and wave inundation planning information is available. Assessment should include the Hanapepe River area, Port Allen Harbor, and Salt Pond. It should identify priority planning areas where resources and planning efforts need to be focused and identify how and where to use adaptation strategies such as accommodation, retreat, and protection, and should encourage relocation to safer areas. 2. Adaptation strategies and approaches should include actions that are based on the ancestral knowledge of kanaka maoli (i.e.,,practice of kilo). H. GOAL: Maintain the character of Hanapepe as a historic town and a thriving center for residents, artists, craftspeople, farmers, and small businesses. A. REVITALIZE THE HISTORIC CENTER OF HANAPEPE TO SHOWCASE AND ACCOMMODATE ARTISTS, SMALL BUSINESSES, SERVICES, AND ACTIVITIES. 1. Cluster new commercial and community activity within the Neighborhood Center along Hanapepe Road near existing businesses. 2. Encourage incremental infill in vacant spaces within the historic town center. rem s pace. 3. Provide for public and semi - (public space to support activities such as markets, festivals, and community events. 4. Provide affordable housing options in a variety of forms consistent with the existing town character. 5. Revitalize the western portion of Hanapepe Road. 6. Preserve the character of "mom and pop" small shops. 7. Explore the development of a revitalization ,f. V 2.4.3 SOUTH KAUAI The South Kaua'i District is bounded by Wahiawa Gulch to the west, and on the east by Ha'upu mountain ridge, Knudsen Gap, and Mount Kahili. The Planning District includes the towns of Po'ipu, Kukui'ula, Koloa, 'Oma'o, Lawa'i, and Kalaheo, and encompasses an area of approximately 31,300 acres (49 square miles). The South Kauai Community Plan (SKCP) was adopted in 2015. It sets forth a Vision, Policies, and Land Use Map for the District. Policies included in the SKCP are comprehensive and address a range of topics. In addition, this section explains changes to the Land Use Map for South Kaua'i District that were made in order to ensure consistency with the conventions used in the Future Land Use Map. Vision and Community Descriptions The Vision for South Kaua'i in 2035 is shown below. c� South Kaua' i is comprised of distinct rural communities, each embracing its own rich cultural, natural, and historic heritage, but well- connected through safe and efficient transportation networks. Balanced, responsible development enhances existing communities, preserving the local rural lifestyle that embodies South Kaua'i and is cherished by residents and visitors alike. South Kauali Community Plan (SKCP) (2015) Koloa The site of the State's first sugar plantation, Koloa is a compact, thriving village. It rests in the mid -land plains between the mauka villages along Kaumuali'i Highway and the makai tourism - focused villages and resorts. Its compact commercial main street strikes a balance between serving local residents and tourists. Koloa can be categorized as a Small Town due to the intensity and size of the commercial core, and the prominence of the area within the region. The neighborhood center extends several blocks along Koloa Road between Po'ipu Road and Waikomo Road. The SKCP's Vision statement for Koloa in 2035 is as follows: Koloa will be a thriving commercial and residential community that maintains its rural feel and historic "old town" charm by preserving, enhancing, and 74 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN SOUTH KAUAI Place Type: Koloa: Small Town Kalaheo: Small Town Po'ipu: Village Kukui'ula: Village Lawa'i: Village 'Oma'o: Crossroads protecting its vast cultural treasures. Koloa's history is preserved through the plantation/ western architecture in the town core, its historic churches, and other historic buildings. In the town core, renovations and new buildings follow the style of "Old Koloa Town." Shaded by building canopies and large trees, pedestrian walkways connect "pockets" of public parking at each end of town. The town provides Koloa and Po'ipu residents with vital services such as grocery stores, the Post Office, and the Neighborhood Center. Both visitors and residents are also attracted to Koloa because of its unique shops, restaurants, and taverns. Outside of town, the former Koloa Sugar Mill is in active use as a light industrial center and a food processing and packing facility. Coffee, papaya, and other export crops are being grown on former sugar lands. Po'ipu Po'ipu is a collection of makai developments and the historic epicenter for resorts and tourist activity on the southern shore of Kauai. It has large expanses of sandy beaches, including the popular Po'ipu Beach Park, and is highly developed with a nearly unbroken maze of resorts and tourist lodgings between Po'ipu Road and the shore. Po'ipu •can, be classified as a Village place type. ; The SKCP's Vision statement for Po'ipu in 2035 is as follows: Po'ipu will be a world- class, sustainable resort destination serving residents and visitors alike, developed responsibly, with clean, healthy beaches and ocean environments, welcoming parks and preserved heritage resources, all well- connected and accessible to everyone. Po'ipu is a beach resort that accommodates both a residential community and the island's largest Visitor Destination Area. Supported by the growing community of Kukui'ula to the west and by historic Koloa Town to the north, Po'ipu is home to about 40 percent of KauaTs resort accommodations and is a major center of employment. Po'ipu is known for its many outdoor recreation opportunities afforded by its beaches, surf breaks, diving spots, golf courses, and tennis facilities. Bicycle tours use old agricultural roads belonging to Grove Farm and McBryde. Walkers, joggers, and bicyclists enjoy the continuous pedestrian /bicycle pathway that runs along the shoreline from the Spouting Horn to Maha'ulepu. I 'ike 'oe is Kauai a puni a 'ike 'ole is Kauai -iki, a'ole no 'oe i 'ike is Kauai If you have seen all of the places of Kauai and have not seen Little Kauai, you have not seen the whole of Kauai. (Kaua'i -liki, little Kauai, is a stone that stood in a taro patch at Wahiawa, Kauai. When it was threatened with destruction by the building of a road, it was rescued by Walter McBryde and taken to Mai'aloa and later to Kukui- o -Lono park, where it stands today). Kalaheo Kalaheo is the largest mauka village in the South Kaua'i District. It is bisected by Kaumuali'i Highway and made up of neighborhoods weaving around hilly terrain to both the north and south. Kalaheo can be categorized as a Small Village due to its size and intensity of retail and civic uses. Existing commercial uses are concentrated along the highway and include a bakery, pharmacy, service uses, and food establishments serving primarily residents. The SKCP's Vision statement for Kalaheo in 2035 is as follows: Kalaheo wil Kalaheo Town 76 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1 remain as a residential community enhanced by a neighborhood - scaled commercial center and supported by small local businesses. In Kalaheo, numerous homes dot the hillsides mauka of town and around Kukuiolono Park. The population of Kalaheo is growing, as homestead and agricultural subdivisions created in the 1970s and '80s are built out with homes. In the town center, business properties are gradually being renovated with building designs supporting the paniolo theme. Public parking lots help to relieve traffic congestion and sidewalks encourage people to walk around town. Businesses have expanded mauka and makai of Kaumuali'i Highway along the larger intersections. An active business association promotes the paniolo town theme and sponsors an annual town celebration. On the western edge of town, near Brydeswood, a shopping center with a large grocery store helps to provide for the needs of a growing population. Lawai and`Oma'o �Dwiao Lawa'i is a small mauka neighborhood straddling a winding section of Kaumuali'i Highway. It has two distinct "crossroad" -size commercial nodes —along Koloa Road at Lauoho Road, near the old cannery, and on the highway at Aulima Road where the post office and market are located. Though physically encompassing a large area, LawaTs neighborhood pattern is highly defined and limited by reservoirs and hilly topography. Lawa'i can be categorized as a Village due to the limited retail and civic uses found at the core and the surrounding residential areas and hills. 'Oma'o is classified as a Crossroads place type. It consists of a small series of mauka neighborhoods that reach southward from Kaumuali'i Highway. It has no defined commercial node but is rather a largely residential neighborhood, limited in connectivity, size, and future growth bytopography and reservoirs. 'Oma'o is a small residential community with a small central park. The SKCP's Vision statement for Lawa'i and 'Oma'o in 2035 is as follows: Lawa'i will remain a rural crossroads with a limited commercial area centered on the Post Office and Old Cannery. Oma'o will maintain its value as a small rural residential community. Lawa'i and 'Oma'o are valued as rural crossroads and small rural residential communities. The small commercial area around the old Lawa'i Cannery is developed with shops and services that serve the nearby residential neighborhoods, as well as people traveling along Kaumuali'i Highway or Koloa Road. Edges around the existing communities are maintained, preventing sprawl. A scenic roadway corridor along Koloa Road maintains separation between Koloa and Lawa'i. Kukui'ula Kukui'ula is a growing area with many important assets: Spouting Horn, Kukui'ula Small Boat Harbor, the NationalTropical Botanical Garden, and a beautiful coastline. This community is the focus of much new development, with a new high -end shopping center and entitlements for large subdivisions set around golf courses. A Vision statement was not developed for Kukui'ula in the SKCP. Land Use Map Changes for South Kaua'i The South Kaua'i Land Use Map is shown on Figure 5 -4. Updates to Land Use Designations since the 2000 General Plan version are described below. Neighborhood Centers and Form -Based Code Transects In order to accommodate the growth projected for South Kaua'i, the SKCP delineated six Special Planning Areas (SPAs). These represent specific areas where compact, walkable communities are desired in both new and existing neighborhood centers and nodes. South Kaua'i uses a Form- Based Code Framework and has regulating plans for three of these SPAS ( Koloa Town, Kalaheo Town, and the Po'ipu Roundabout). It uses Neighborhood Center and General Designations, as well as Neighborhood Edge designation for areas within a 12 -mile radius (ten minute walk) from the Neighborhood Centers. The SPAs are required to follow the design and land use standards detailed in the South Kaua'i Form - Based Code regardless of the underlying zoning. The other three areas (Lawai Cannery, Numila, and Po'ipu Gateway) will undergo a special master planning process to develop regulating plans and transects when development is proposed. On the Future Land Use Map they are labeled either as a Large Town or a Small Town. The Po'ipu Gateway Mixed -Use Village is classified as a Large Town and Lawa'i Cannery and Numila are classified as Small Towns. These place types are general placeholders for the future SPAs until their Regulating Plans with transect zones are determined. They also will be required to use the transect zones defined in the South Kaua'i form -based code. SPAs are a County zoning designation that is a higher level of detail than appropriate for the General Plan Land Use Map.Areasfor infill and future development in South Kaua'i are shown on the General Plan Land Use Map as Neighborhood Centers and General, or as future place types based on the characteristics of their envisioned build form and relationship to other communities. Natural Hazards and Climate Change Resilience in South Kauai The South Kaua'i district is vulnerable to natural hazards, including marine and terrestrial flooding, wave inundation, erosion, and storms and tsunamis. All of these hazards are expected to be exacerbated by climate change and sea level rise, threatening residential, commercial and agricultural activities. This calls for a need to employ resiliency strategies 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 12.0 FUTURE LAND USE 77 2.4.4 LIHUT The Lihu'e Planning District is the "heart" of Kaua'i. Extending north to the Wailua River and south to Ha'upu Ridge, the district serves as the main business, government, and transportation center of the island. The Uhu'e region includes the main communities of Lihu'e, Hanama'ulu, and Puhi. Sub- areas and neighborhoods include Nawiliwili, Kapaia, Kipu, Kalepa, Nuhou, Niumalu, Kalapaki, and Pu'ali. The most recent Lihu'e Community Plan (LCP) was adopted in 2015. It sets forth a Vision, Policies, and Land Use Map for the District. This General Plan incorporates the LCP Vision, land use map, and policies. Policies included in the Uhu'e Community Plan are comprehensive and address a range of topics. Only those that are specific to the communities in the Lihu'e District are reproduced here. In addition, this section explains changes to the Land Use Map for Uhu'e District that were made in order to ensure consistency with the conventions used in the islandwide Land Use Maps. Vision and Community Descriptions The Vision for the Uhu'e District is as follows: The Lihu'e District shall be a place with walkable, compact communities, each distinct yet connected, and each with its own unique identity and sense of place. Green, open spaces between communities serve as visual and physical buffers and evoke Kaua'?i-s rural essence. Lihu'e Town serves as a destination and gathering place for the island, with a vibrant Town Core and a desirable mix of uses and attractions for residents and visitors. Lihu'e Community Plan (2015) Community descriptions for the communities of Lihu'e, Hanama'ulu, and Puhi are provided below. Uhu'e Town Lihu'e Town is the County seat of Kaua'i and the island's major commercial and civic center. It is the only community on Kaua'i that consists of four or more neighborhoods and can be classified as a Large Town place type. Lihu'e Town is bounded by the Hanama'ulu and Nawiliwili Gulches on the north and south and by the shoreline and the Isenberg neighborhood along Kuhio Highway on the east and west. Key LIHU'E Place Type: Lihu'e: Large Town Hanama'ulu: Small Town Puhi: Village awiliwil Crossroads 11f'a Wi�i �`�� �� ✓ Kapaia: Crossroads 1 �E' commercial centers in Uhu'e town include the Civic Center District, Kuhio Highway commercial strip, and portions of Rice Street. The town developed along Haleko Road (north of Rice Street) and Rice Street, both of which are designated as historic roads. The Kuhio Highway commercial strip has developed alongside the adjacent Isenberg and 'Akahi- 'Elua neighborhoods and serve as a hub for those populations. The east side of Kuhio Highway consists of commercial storefronts with neoclassical and art deco architectural influences. The 'Akahi -'Elua neighborhood between Ahukini Street and Hardy Street has relatively large lots and the residential architecture styles of the homes remaining are of cottage, craftsman, and prairie styles from the 1930s and early 1940s. Rice Street between Kress and Kalena Street was developed as a retail center secondary to the Kuhio Highway Commercial District. With continuous storefronts along both sides of the streets and several 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 12.0 FUTURE LAND USE 79 historic buildings, Rice Street is often characterized as Lihu'e's "Main StreE "' Hanama'ulu Hanama'ulu isa former plantation village and housing subdivision that lies between the Hanama'ulu Gulch and Kalepa Ridge. Kuhib Highway bisects the community and links it to L-ihu'e Town, Puhi, and Kapa'a. In 1877, Hanama'ulu Mill became the second mill for Lihu'e Plantation. In the 1950s and 1960s, L-ihu'e Plantation opened several subdivisions and offered them for sale to their workers. These subdivisions surround the village center and flank both sides of Kuhi6 Highway. The small village center was a cluster of plantation structures including the Hanama'ulu Trading Company and post office, both of which were destroyed by fire in 2012 along with several other businesses. Portions of these structures have since been rebuilt. The village center has several small businesses including a gas station, warehouses, a convenience store, park, and elementary school, all within walking distance from its neighborhoods. A recent housing project called Kalepa Village is a workforce housing project that is done in plantation vernacular and is the only multi - family development in the vicinity. Puhi Puhi is the newest developed community in the L-ihu'e District, and is designated as a Village place type. It is located south and west of Nawiliwili Gulch and has access to Uhu'e Town along Kaumuali'i Highway. Puhi is home to KauaTs major regional shopping center, Kukui Grove Center, as well as a large industrial park and big box retailers including Costco. This makes Puhi a commercial destination and employment center that experiences a large amount of daily commuter traffic from across the island. The area mauka of Kaumuali'i Highway is a decidedly more open landscape, with expanses of green space and agricultural uses. This mauka area is home to the campuses of Island School and Kaua'i Community College, as well as the historic Kilohana Plantation and railroad, a prominent attraction. The land usecharacterissuburbanwith predominantly single family residential developments, shopping mall and big box retail, cul -de -sac road systems, and large lot single family homes with golf course frontages. Overall, Puhi provides a diverse mix of uses, residential dwellings, light industrial, retail, and education. With these established uses, Puhi is poised to remain a regional destination into the future, and also to experience residential growth to support employment and educational opportunities there. Land Use Map Changes for Uhu'e The L-ihu'e Land Use Map is shown on Figure 5 -5. Updates to Land Use Designations since the 2000 General Plan version are described below. ;lr�Fk i:U�i: Ib�;li: ;•� r J f hio Highway Commercial Center serves as a hub for L-ihu'e Town and adjacent Isen iahborhood and'Akahi -'Elua Street. Neighborhood Centers & Urban Growth Boundary As the main urbanized area on Kaua'i that is planned to accommodate approximately half of its future growth, the Land Use Map for the L-ihu'e District looks different than the rest of the island. The Uhu'e District was the first to adopt an Urban Growth Boundary to delineate the limits of desired urban growth. Within the Urban Growth Boundary, there are multiple existing and future designated Neighborhood Centers that correspond to Mixed Use Special Planning Areas (SPAs). These SPAS indicate priority "areas of change" for infill and new development to accommodate projected population growth. Most of these Neighborhood 80 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN '-4 Co hiV*Cre- i41 bualdkh9 Wl7n S'�vVC1 •Froh+Agr, v-v, KU►7 /o /%AW-Ay ih L7bu/e,. i ar Centers are within a half mile of one another, creating a continuous tapestry of urbanized lands of varying density. The Neighborhood General designation is not applied in Cihu'e, as most of the walksheds overlap. Instead, the General Plan Urban Center designation is retained in those developable areas outside of designated Neighborhood Centers. Natural Hazards and Climate Change Resilience in Lihu'e District The Lihu'e district is vulnerable to natural hazards, including marine and terrestrial flooding, wave inundation, erosion, and storms and tsunamis. All of these hazards are expected to be exacerbated by climate change and sea level rise, threatening residential, commercial, and agricultural activities. The coastal areas of Nawiliwili, Niumalu, and Huleia stream are particularly vulnerable to coastal hazards. This calls for a need to employ resiliency strategies in community siting, design, and relocation. The Kaua'i Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment conducted a preliminary Sea Level Rise (SLR) Inundation Assessment and Needs for Nawiliwili (Needs Assessment) utilizing "bathtub" still water flood modeling from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) SLR viewer. The inundation maps for the 1 -foot, 3 -foot, and 6-foot SLR scenarios can be found in Appendix D. Nawiliwili is an important industrial and port area with infrastructure that may require protection to maintain essential services. It is recommended that a hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment for coastal hazards with climate change and SLR be conducted with particular focus around Nawiliwili Stream, Huleia Stream, Kalapaki Beach, Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, and the Niumalu area. Such an assessment should incorporate planning information depicting wave inundation and erosion impacts from SLR, which is currently being developed by researchers at University of Hawai'i and others for the State SLR adaptation report. The Needs Assessment also notes that the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA FIRM maps indicate most of the shoreline around Kalapaki and Nawiliwili is outside the 100 -year flood plain (Zone X) and this may underestimate the risk since these maps do not incorporate sea level rise. The County may adopt requirements for flood hazard mitigation and adaptation that account for SLR hazards that are above and beyond the FIRM flood zones and base flood elevations (BFEs). Kaua'i Museum with the County Building lawn and associated monument in the foreground. Other Land Use Changes Changes to Residential land use designations are made in two areas. Residential designations are removed from several areas in Pu'ali, south of Puhi, as they were far from Neighborhood Centers and did not support the County policy of compact development. A portion of the EWM property near the northern end of the District was designated as Residential. Goals, Policy Objectives, and Actions for Lihu'e . {ore: i- eWC12R —' Community planning; guidance for the district is contained in the LCP and Lihu'e Town Core Urban Design Plan (2010). Kaua'i Community College in Puhi 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 81 2.4.5 EAST KAUA'1 The East Kaua'i district extends from the Wailua River north to Moloa'a, including the Kapa'a- Wailua basin, Kealia, and Anahola. The Kapa'a - Wailua basin is home to a large portion of KauaTs population. An urban corridor extends along Kuhib Highway from Haleilio Road in Wailua to Kawaihau Road, atthe northern edge of Kapa'a Town. East Kaua'i has extensive mauka residential areas, including Kapahi and+VVailua Homesteads. Preliminary Vision & Priorities vva`lua The vision and priorities are preliminary as they have not been examined through an in -depth community planning effort. They provide guidance for specific areas and will inform future community planning efforts. By 2035, We Envision an East Kaua'i Where: Residents enjoy a high quality of life in a rural setting. Natural resources are protected and open spaces and public access are preserved Agricultural lands are farmed, productive, and protected. Affordable housing opportunities exist for local residents. Archaeological, historic, and cultural places in our community are honored, preserved, and maintained. New recreational facilities provide safe and healthy opportunities for youth and adults. Historic Kapa'a Town maintains its western plantation character, is livable and walkable, with mixed uses, pedestrian - friendly streets, bike paths, new parking, and public transit. A range of visitor accommodation types are in place and new attractions have opened. Deferred infrastructure needs have been addressed. Public transit service has increased and is integrated into new developments. 82 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN EAST KAUAI Place Type: Place Types: Wailua: Village Kapahi: Village Kapa'a: Large Town Anahola: Rural Crossroads (near Post Office), Future Village (atAnahola Marketplace) Degree of Change: Wailua: Incremental Kapahi: Incremental Kapa'a: Transformational Anahola: Incremental atAnahola Post Office; Transformational atAnahola Marketplace Wailua Wailua is designated as a village place type. Community input indicated that the area along the Kuhib Highway bounded roughly by Haleilio Road, Lanikai Street, and Papaloa Road provides a good opportunity for a Neighborhood Center in proximity to residential neighborhoods in Wailua and resort areas along the coast. Portions of Wailua within 12 mile of this center can accommodate additional residential uses on underutilized and vacant parcels. Kapahi Community support is indicated for a future Village place type at Kapahi. A Neighborhood Center was identified along Kawaihau Road, roughly between Kuahale Street and. Puukaa Street. This area in the future can accommodate a mix of medium - intensity residential uses, along with additional commercial and service uses, in a configuration that is supportive of transit. Puukcact Kapa'a Town Kapa'a Town's future growth pattern depends largely upon the intensity of implementation related to a key community policy regarding traffic north of the Wailua bridge. The 2000 General Plan does earmark large residential growth at the Hokua Place property near Kapa'a Middle School. The area is designated as Urban Center. However, community opinion remains divided, with strong concerns about the perceived impacts of the proposed development on traffic. Supporters cite the great need for housing and the consistency of the Hokua Place proposal with smart growth principles. Others feel that the proposed traffic mitigation measures won't be enough to counteract negative impacts, that sewer infrastructure is constrained, and that because of the East Kaua'i congestion, affordable housing development should be concentrated in Uhu'e. Another concern is that much of Kapa'a Town is within tsunami evacuation and flood zones. Sea level rise projections show that much of the area could be inundated if SLR reaches 3 feet, as is currently anticipated by the year 2100. These considerations raise further questions about how much growth should be encouraged and accommodated within the Kapa'a- Wailua corridor. In the public consultation process, two map alternatives were developed for Kapa'a Town's future that reflected this dual input. In the first alternative, Kapa'a transforms from a Small Town to a Large Town place type. The existing Town Center boundary is extended mauka along Olohena road with the idea that the Main Street environmentatOlohena and Kuhio could extend mauka to the roundabout and the northeast corner of the Hokua property. Hokua Place would organize medium - intensity residential neighborhoods on the' %Makaf side c" of the property and lower- intensity neighborhoods to the west. In this alternative, residential growth would be absorbed on the Hokua site as well as on opportunity sites in and around central Kapa'a. In particular, sites around the Baptiste sports complex may need infrastructure investment (such as flood control) to make medium - intensity development feasible. ONE=— c Kapa'a Town In the second alternative, Kapa'a would maintain a Small Town place type, concentrating growth in and around three nodes of existing development along the Kuhio Highway rather than at Hokua Place. In this alternative, residential growth would be absorbed on opportunity sites in and around central Kapa'a. This alternative would require more intense development patterns in order to accommodate a similar amount of growth as the first alternative. The Future Land Use Map moves forward the 2000 General Plan's higher - intensity designation for the area, but also updates and refines the designation based on the first alternative map scenario and new population projections. The previous Urban Center designation is changed to Neighborhood General, which will require a mix of residential building types and a walkable, compact form where connectivity to the school and Kapa'a Town is emphasized. The size of the future Urban District boundary amendment should consider walkshed boundaries and accommodate future housing projections. Anahola Much of the land in Anahola is owned and managed by the State Department of Hawaiian Homelands (DHHL). According to the Kaua'i Island Plan, Anahola is DHHL's largest residential homestead area on Kaua'i and is their priority development area. DHHUs Anahola Regional Plan (2012) calls for future development of residential homesteads and agricultural uses in the area, as well as the establishment of a new Town Center along Kuhio Highway. The Anahola Town Center Plan (2012) describes the proposed Town Center. While a portion of site designation for the Town Center has since been replaced by a solar farm, the East Kaua'i Community Workshop held as part of this General Plan confirmed that the community still supports the Town Center, and this General Plan identifies it as a 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 83 Historical shoreline change studies indicate a long - term trend of shoreline erosion for most of the Wailua- Kapa'a shoreline, which is expected to increase with accelerated SLR. Kapa'a Beach Park is particularly vulnerable and erosion of the beach threatens the bike path, resorts, and homes, especially in proximity to the Pono Kai seawall. Flanking erosion is particularly pronounced at the northern end of the wall, which is a common issue with sea walls. The Needs Assessment also recommends a coastal and beach management plan for Wailua / Kapa'a including regional sand management and beach conservation and restoration as alternatives to increased coastal armoring in residential areas. For Anahola and Moloa'a, given the high degree of exposure to flooding hazards around the stream and backshore areas as well as chronic beach erosion issues, community -scale risk and vulnerability assessments are also advised by the needs assessment. 'Aliomanu Road at the north end of Anahola Bay has recently been threatened by coastal erosion. A vulnerability assessment for the road and long term plans for its protection or relocation need to be considered. The Needs Assessment also notes that the flood areas as shown on the the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) are likely to expand as the frequency and severity of flooding events increase with SLR. The County may adopt requirements for flood hazard mitigation /adaptation that accountfor SLR hazards and are above and beyond the FIRM flood zones and base flood elevations (BFEs). Chapter 3, Section IX Actions pointtothe need to updatethe Countyflood program. Other Land Use Map Changes No additional changes to the land use map for East Kaua'i are made. Guidance for Community Planning The following goals and actions are preliminary and will inform future community planning processes. L GOAL: Accommodate East Kaua'i's projected housing needs. 1. Allow the buildout of communities based on existing zoning with the exception of areas impacted by future sea level rise and other hazards. 2. In new communities, ensure the majority of units are "missing middle housing" and affordable by design. 3. Design new communities to be walkable, compact, and connected to Kapa'a Town. 4. The build -out phasing of new communities should be coordinated with the implementation of priority projects in the Kapa'a Transportation Solutions Plan. remove space,, IL GOAL: Ensure that East Kaua' i is resilient to Climate Change and coastal hazards. 1. Conduct detailed hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment for coastal hazards with climate change and sea level rise in East Kaua'i when updated sea level rise, erosion rates, and wave inundation planning information is available. Assessment should include Wailua - Kapa'a shoreline and low -lying areas around the town, canals and rivers, critical infrastructure, residential, and commercial facilities. Additional assessments should be conducted in vulnerable areas of Anahola and Moloa'a. Assessments should identify priority planning areas where resources and planning efforts need to be focused and identify how and where to use adaptation strategies such as accommodation, retreat, and protection, and should encourage relocation to safer areas. 2. Seek partnerships with State, UH, County. and private entities to develop a coastal and beach management plan for Wailua / Kapa'a including regional sand management and beach conservation and restoration as alternatives to increased coastal armoring in residential areas. Ill. GOAL: Celebrate Wailua's rich and cultural heritage. A. PROTECT SCENIC CORRIDORS AND SITES OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE. 1. Update inventory of cultural sites. 2. Coordinate Work with Open Space Commission and Kaua'i Historic Preservation Commission. 3. Discourage development away from scenic corridors and areas of cultural significance. 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING i 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 85 B. SHARE AND EDUCATE VISITORS AND THE B. PRESERVE THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY ABOUT WAILUA'S HISTORY. KAPA'A TOWN. 1. Develop signage with historical information. 1. Update East Kaua'i Community Plan and rPsppQ« incorporate Form- Based Code for Historic 2. Establish a Wailua Cultural Center and/or Visitor Kapa'a Town. information center. - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - -- 2. Improve design guidelines for buildings and IV. GOAL: Increase connectivity within the streetscapes. Wailua corridor to better connect residential, resort, commercial, and recreational uses. 3. Educate property owners on incentives for historic preservation. 1. Clear and maintain vegetation along Kuamo'o and Olohena Road for pedestrian and bicyclists safety and comfort. 2. Provide alternative routes for pedestrian and bicyclists from Wailua Houselots to Kuamo'o Road. 3. Add bicycle lanes on Kuamo'o Road and Olohena Road. 4. Increase frequency of Wailua shuttle. 5. Establish more park and ride sites in Wailua Homesteads and Wailua Houselots. V. GOAL: Enhance historic Kapa'a Town. A. ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND MIXED -USE WITHIN THE TOWN CORE. 1. Educate community members and landowners about special planning areas. 2. Provide incentives to property owners of vacant parcels in Historic Kapa'a Town to develop buildings for mixed -use. 3. Update East Kaua'i Community Plan and incorporate form-based Code for Historic Kapa'a Town. Form -Based 4. Provide a range of affordable housing types 5. Develop a parking audit for Kapa'a Town. 86 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN VI. GOAL: Increase connectivity from the town to recreation and residential areas along Kukui/ Olohena Road. A. IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANS ITCONNECTIVITY. NotrE : inse�v sPaeC 1. Add sidewalks along Olohena Road from the Kapa'a Middle School to the town. 2. Ensure safe pedestrian and bicycle paths that connect the beach parks to the town and to residential areas. 3. Ensure new communities support the County's mode shift goals and improve vehicular and pedestrian connectivity to parks, schools, and Kapa'a Town. Vll. GOAL: Address traffic congestion. A. IMPROVE CAPACITY WITHIN THE WAILUA- KAPA'A CORRIDOR. 1. Implement the Kapa'a Transportation Solutions projects. 2. Continue to work with HDOT. VIII. GOAL: Support DHHL's Island General Plan and Anahola Plan. A. IMPROVE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY, DHHL, AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. 1. Work with the DHHL to ensure the Anahola Plan is compatible with the area's Community Plan. Hanalei Bay concern about the current large number of tourists passing through Hanalei and the town's capacity to manage this daily influx of visitors. Exploring transportation alternatives for traveling to and around Hanalei is thus a priority in order to mitigate peak vehiculartraffic levels and tourist impacts on the town, but with sensitivityto the goal of improving the means of access to the town, rather than increasing the volume of tourist access. One such consideration is to implement a bike -share program in the town center that would provide opportunities to reduce private vehicular trips. Such a program could be coordinated with regional transit and shuttle options connecting to other park- and -ride locations on the North Shore and even elsewhere on Kaua'i, allowing 11� visitors to easily travel to regional destinations Y including Kilauea Lighthouse, ,Ke'e Beach, and ✓ &'ena State Park without using a private vehicle. Trail connec ons (outlined in the Kauai Path North Shore Path Alterna ves Report (2012)) between Hanalei and Princeville were also discussed as an alternative, recreational option for pedestrians and bicyclists. Tourist capacity is a continued concern for residents, -�' who wish to see TVRs convert back to housing for locals and the stabilization of Hanalei's c popula a_ on, which has been in decline. In preparing the community for possible hurricanes and tsunamis, clear and abundant signage will be important for the education of this constant visitor population. It is imperative to reduce the number of TVRs in the high risk tsunami zones for the safety of both visitors and residents. Hanalei's sensitive natural environment and strained 88 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN single highway access -point into town make the control of the community's future growth important. The previous Town Center boundary, extending farther west than the existing commercial center, has been reduced in size to incorporate only the current mixed -use area at its eastern end. Although the center is not expected to expand, residents would like to see more neighborhood - serving businesses amongst the shops in the center. Princeville An incremental degree of change could help Princeville to provide better connectivity and preserve public access to open space, while adopting more compact and connected land use patterns for future development. Residents expressed that public access and connectivity are primary issues for lands both mauka and makai of Kuhio Highway. Public access to the shoreline has come under threat as vacation residences continue to develop down the coast. The community faces a critical need to preserve and restore public access to beaches, shorelines, and open space as new development progresses. In addition, public pedestrian and bicycle access is importantto preserve and improve through Princeville's neighborhoods and properties. As Princeville expands, good street connections are also critical to establish between Phases I and II, in order to improve pedestrian and bicycle circulation and not further exacerbate the busy Kuhio Highway. Residents strongly desire more sensitive considerations of land use and development rights for Princeville's surrounding rural and agricultural lands. The community has seen the impacts of a loosely- defined agricultural land use, with large - lot residential subdivisions consuming valuable undeveloped land and eroding the rural character of the North Shore. However, these "gentleman estates" were still preferred to high- density condos. Residents desire that new resorts would be developed at an appropriate, small- footprint scale for the rural surroundings. More thoughtful consideration of appropriate locations for developable land uses is also a priority; for example, community members expressed widespread sentiment to limit development mauka of the highway, concentrating new residential neighborhoods and institutions (such as a school) close to the cores of existing communities. Future master planning efforts for Princeville Shopping Center could improve the area's multimodal access and connectivity. This could include better pedestrian crossings between the Center and adjacent areas, including the affordable housing project to the west. Improved pedestrian facilities and context - sensitive elements can calm vehicular traffic along the scenic viewplane portion of Kuhio Highway, including safer shoulders and pedestrian crossings at the Hanalei Valley Lookout. A regional transit facility can also be incorporated into the expansion of the Princeville Shopping Center, providing a shuttle stop for visitors traveling between North Shore destinations, with an accompanying park- and -ride lot. Mixed -use development can be focused at this node. Kilauea Otherthan Lihu'e, Kilauea is the only othertown with a micro - regional plan. Community outreach reveals much of the information included in the Kilauea Town Plan (2006) remains valid and should continue through this planning horizon. Local interest in modest growth and a desire to better accommodate day visitors make Kilauea an ideal candidate for incremental growth. It is designated as a future Small Town place type. The Town Plan supports additional housing development of approximately 200 -240 units on undeveloped land west of the town. The community felt it was important that the majority of any future residential development be affordable. Forfuture growth to occur, headed both to the center and the lighthouse could use this as a new primary route, relieving traffic on the residential portions of Kilauea Road. The center's westward expansion could integrate a pool of parking for tourists, coordinated with a new shuttle to the lighthouse and other North Shore destinations, to further manage access and mitigate tourist traffic impacts. Live /work buildings were envisioned as a naturally- fitting building type option forthe community, allowing residents to generate capital directly out of the home. Improved pedestrian and bicycle routes further supportthis evolution of the walkable center. Residents desire more consistent sidewalks, path connections .to the agricultural park, and coordinated multimodal trail options between North Shore communities and even between different._moku'. Improved access and connections to the local beaches from the center is a further priority, as is the addition of industrial lands in Kilauea to allow for more local production space. Kilauea's relationship with Kuhio Highway is a focus for future change to improve safe access and community visibility. A series of roundabouts is one possible strategy to create attractive gateways, slow vehicle speeds passing Kilauea, and create safer intersections. Future roundabouts could be implemented at the new• westward bypass road to Keneke Street, connecting to C the highway across from Kaua'i Miniature Golf; at Kolo Z Road, a current primary entrance to the community; and, at Hookui Road, near a small assortment of commercial businesses. Any considerations of growth are coupled with existing concerns of water and municipal sewer access. The community has expressed interest in considering progressive solutions to sewage treatment and encouraging more widespread rainwater catchment practices. a regional wastewater treatment solution will have to be developed. Town expansion will also provide the opportunity for a new park and public school site. A new commercial development, currently under construction, will improve access to neighborhood - serving services. Should town expansion occur, an assessment of commercial space needs should be conducted. Kilauea Road already faces significant traffic from tourists traveling to the National Historic site, the Kilauea Lighthouse. This problem can be addressed with an expansion of the center westward from Keneke Street, with a new road connection from the center to Kuhio Highway serving as a backbone for new neighborhood development, consistent with the town plan. Traffic As with the rest of the North Shore, Kilauea residents balance their desires for growth of a neighborhood - serving center with great concern for maintaining the precious local natural environment, especially with significant tourist demand on the region. The community shares a desire to create a coordinated shuttle service for the North Shore to relieve highway traffic demands and could implement a park- and -ride lot either within the new center expansion, or at the Kaua'i Miniature Golf property. .,,; Land Use Map Changes Neighborhood Centers and Walksheds In Hanalei, the Neighborhood Center size was reduced from the 2000 General Plan Town Center designation along its western extent. It now ends at 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 12.0 FUTURE LAND USE 89 the west side of the post office to reflect the current extent of mixed -use activity in Hanalei. The new Neighborhood Center better reflectsthe community's commitment to limiting future growth and the desire to preserve the historic and cultural landscape along the highway west of the Neighborhood Center. Kilauea's 2000 General Plan Town Center boundary is largely maintained in location and scale as the new Neighborhood Center, with small adjustments to the northern and western edges. The existing residential neighborhood makai of the center was removed to establish the northern boundary. The western edge was adjusted to represent a more realistic general location of the center extension based on the likely alignment of a new western bypass road. The depth of the western portion of the Center approximates the land area necessary for reasonable mixed -use development lots with parking. A Neighborhood Center designation was added in Princeville atthe existing Princeville Shopping Center and adjacent parcels between Hanalei Plantation Road and Ka Haku Road. These include the fire station, affordable housing community, and vacant land to the west of the shopping center and the bank building, library, and vacant land on the mauka side of Emmalani Drive to the west. The Neighborhood Center designation acknowledges that while Princeville is a private, master - planned development, the shopping center is mixed use and serves as a community hub that exhibits characteristics of a Neighborhood Center. Given land use patterns makai of the highway and substantial topography changes mauka, there is little opportunity for walksheds to create a large development area, thus, the surrounding land use designations were retained. Natural Hazards and Climate Change Resilience on the North Shore The North Shore district is vulnerable to natural hazards, including marine and terrestrial flooding, wave inundation, erosion, storms, and tsunamis. All of these hazards are expected to be exacerbated by climate change and sea level rise, threatening residential, commercial, and agricultural activities. This calls for a need to employ resiliency strategies in community siting, design, and relocation. The communities of Kalihiwai, 'Anini, Hanalei, Wainiha, and Ha'ena are particularly vulnerable to coastal hazards, particularly flooding from high waves, flash flooding, and tsunamis. The Kauai Climate Change and Coastal Hazards 90 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Assessment conducted a preliminary Sea Level Rise (SLR) Inundation Assessment and Needs for Hanalei, Wainiha, and Haena (Needs Assessment) utilizing "bathtub" still water flood modeling from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) SLR viewer. The inundation maps for the 1 -foot and 3 -foot SLR scenarios can be found in Appendix E. The maps show a high potential for increased flooding from SLR due to the low lying nature of Hanalei situated between Hanalei and Waioli streams. The maps likely underestimates SLR related hazards, however, because the model does not account for increased coastal erosion and wave induced flooding with increasing sea level rise. This data gap is currently being addressed by University of Hawai'i and other researchers and the planning information is expected within the next few years. Given the high degree of exposure to flooding, wave inundation, and other coastal hazards along the North Shore, it is recommended that a community - scale hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment with climate change and SLR be conducted when updated data becomes available with particular focus on residential, commercial, and visitor accommodations, essential infrastructure like roads and bridges, and agricultural areas. Such an assessment should be conducted in advance of or in conjunction with the Community Plan update. The Needs Assessment recommends that the County may adopt requirements for flood hazard mitigation /adaptation that account for SLR hazards and are above and beyond the FEMA FIRM flood zones and the base floor elevations (BFEs). Actions for Public Safety and Hazards Resiliency point to the need to update the County flood program. Lastly, the Needs Assessment suggests prohibiting the subdivision of coastal propertiesto limit exposure to coastal hazards and prohibiting shoreline armoring to conserve beach ecosystems. While specific Needs Assessments were not conducted for Kalihiwai and tAnini, the SLR data is available for examination, and similar actions and recommendations can be drawn for these low -lying communities. Other Land Use Changes The former residential C mmunity designation at Princeville Airport was changed to Transportation. The Residential Community pod located mauka of Princeville Airport was removed and changed to Agriculture. The Resort designation over the plateau makai of the Prince Golf Club remains yet limited to an immediate window to seek resort- related zoning approvals pursuantto in Actions by Sector, VI Economy, Section 1 Permitting Actions. Policy Opportunities Integrating Transit: The integration of consolidated parking and transitfacilities was a common discussion thread throughout the North Shore communities. Participants considered ways that pools of public parking and transit stops could be integrated into town centers, establishing "park- once" facilities and providing convenient transfer points for tourists accessing Kilauea Lighthouse and Ha'ena State Park, with the goal of mitigating the impact of tourist traffic on the Kuhio Highway and parking facilities at existing visitor destinations. The following Goals, Policies, and Actions are preliminary, and were derived from input received during the North Shore Community Visioning Workshop held in November 2015. They should be further explored and vetted with community input during Community Planning processes. Guidance for Community Planning The following goals and actions are preliminary and will inform future community planning processes. 1. GOAL: Ensure that the North Shore is resilient to Climate Change and coastal hazard Conduct a detailed hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment for coastal hazards with climate change and SLR in Hanalei and other North Shore communitieswhen updated sea level rise, erosion rates, and wave inundation planning information is available. Assessment should include all developed areas of Hanalei, particularly around the streams and beach front parcels, and include critical infrastructure (e.g., roads and bridges), residential, visitor, and commercial facilities. Additional assessments should be conducted in vulnerable areas of Wainiha, Ha'ena, Kalihiwai, and fAnini. Assessment should identify priority planning areas where resources and planning efforts need to be focused and identify how and where to use adaptation strategies such as accommodation, retreat, protection, and encouraged relocation to safer areas. 11. GOAL: Retain and restore the historic character of Hanalei. A. ESTABLISH DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR NEW INFILL DEVELOPMENT TO MATCH THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 1. Require off- street parking lots to be located behind buildings. 2. Allow modest flexibility in site frontages to accommodate pedestrian uses or gathering spaces. B. ENCOURAGE COMPLETE STREETS THAT BALANCE PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, TRANSIT, AND VEHICLE NEEDS WHILE MAINTAINING HANALEI'S RURAL CHARACTER. 1. Provide a path or informal sidewalk on the east side of town to connect existing businesses along Kuhio Highway. 2. Consider a shared use path mauka of Kuhio Highway to provide a parallel route for pedestrians and bicycles. 3. Support a coordinated shuttle service for the North Shore and provide a park- and -ride location and shuttle stop in Hanalei. 4. Install traffic calming features to improve the safety of pedestrian crossings. 5. Explore a bike share program for Hanalei to reduce vehicular trips. C. PROTECT HANALEI'S UNIQUE HERITAGE RESOURCES. PRESERVE THE CHARACTER AND PROTECT THE KALO LO'I OF HANALEI. 1. Preserve the character and integrity of Hanalei's historic highway and bridges. 2. Protect the kalo lo'i of Hanalei in perpetuity. D. BUILD COMMUNITY RESILIENCE THROUGH EDUCATION AND AWARENESS. Educate visitors about threats from tsunami and other hazards and measures for preparedness and response. 2.4 COMMUNITY PLANNING 1 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE 91 V. SHARED SPACES VI. ECONOMY HERITAGE RESOURCES VI11. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY IX. PUBLIC SAFETY & HAZARDS RESILIENCY X. OPPORTUNITY & HEALTH The following four implementation tools are used to categorize each subsection's actions: Permitting and Code Change Actions within this tool address new development and how it is approved. Permitting actions will be reviewed during the approval process. Specific approvals include State Land Use boundary amendments; County Zoning amendments; and Zoning, Special Use, and Variance Permits. "Code Change" indicates items to be addressed in future amendments to development standards. Plans and Studies This section calls for preparing and updating future plans and studies. The General Plan is broad in nature and more detailed follow -up work is needed in many areas. This underscores the importance of future planning efforts and the need to align such efforts with the General Plan's direction. Projects and Programs Actions in this category identify priority County programs and capital projects and include guidance for project selection, design, and funding. Partnership Needs In many cases, County jurisdiction to move actions forward is limited. Partners are non - County entities, including State and Federal agencies, non - profit 0 organizations, community based organizations, U and the general community. Actions in this tool - operate in the spirit of k5kou and "silo- breaking" to acknowledge that other agencies and organizations must help move the policies forward. Actions also identify areas where agencies and the community can collaborate in new ways. 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 95 Nahele (upland), Wao Kanaka (cultivated flat land/ plateau), Kahawai (freshwater resources) and Kaha Kai (coastal areas). A konohiki managed the ahupua'a to ensure the various ecological units functioned adequately to support and provide for the area's residents. KauaTs ahupua'a boundaries are shown on the Heritage Resources Map. Today, the concept of ahupua'a management is not only recognized as KauaTs cultural legacy, but also for its contribution to modern land and natural resource management. Although today's average household may not draw from the ahupua'a for all their needs, everyone benefits from the services that a healthy watershed provides. Successful watershed management is paramount to a sustainable future. However, the growing population creates demands which place pressure on watersheds. The threats include development, improper agricultural practices, invasive species, erosion, and natural Figure 3 -1 Components of the Watershed Sector hazards. Furthermore, there is little doubt that climate change will impact watershed health in ways unprecedented in modern times. The legacy of this cultural practice is perpetuated through the General Plan's goal of sustainability and the vision for thriving ecosystems. By building upon the wisdom of the ancient Hawaiians, who lived in harmony with the land, the General Plan recognizes the complexity and interrelatedness of our island's watersheds and human uses. The organization of this sector's subsections follows the ecological units identified in the ahupua'a: Wao Nahele (The Upper Watershed), Kaha Wai (Freshwater Resources and Drainage), and Kaha Kai (Coastal Areas). A fourth subsection, "Threatened and Endangered Species ", includes actions for protecting KauaTs native plants and animals. 98 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN A.Wao Nahele - Upper Watershed Forests and Native Species Habitat -. D. Threatened and -� �.. Endangered Species B.Kahawai - r -�♦ Middle Watershed: Aquifers, Water Bodies ON Streams, and Drainage C. Kahakai - - - - -> Lower Watershed: Shorelines and Coastal Waters -. D. Threatened and -� �.. Endangered Species z v 3 !n 1. WAO NAHELE - THE UPPER WATERSHED The upper watershed and its forests are critical to the health and integrity of the ecosystem. It provides the essential services of water quality protection, flood mitigation, and fire protection. Moreover, it comprises the vestiges of Kaua'i's native forests and landscapes which are the habitat for many endangered and at -risk species. 1.1 Supporting the State in Upper Watershed Management KauaTs upper watershed is largely under State jurisdiction, both through ownership and by regulatory authority.The State Land Use Conservation District comprises 55 percent of KauaTs land area. Within the Conservation District are 24 State - managed reserves, preserves, and park areas. These are shown on the Heritage Resources Map in Chapter '5. The Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) has responsibility for protecting the public trust and managing forest resources, natural area reserves, and state parks. The forests harbor rare and endangered plant and animal species, and include native ecosystems which are relatively intact. In 2011, the State launched "The Rain Follows the Forest" - a management initiative to sustain fresh water resources by doubling the amount of protected watershed area. 1.2 Aligning Partners for Management of the Watershed and Forests In 2003, the Kaua'i Watershed Alliance (KWA) was established to bring the State, County, private landowners, and non - profit partners together to protect the forested watershed through collaborative management practices. Their projects focus on managing the landscape -scale damage to the watershed caused by feral animals and invasive weeds. Management activities include outplanting, animal control, and constructing and maintaining protective fences. In alignment with the State's goal in "The Rain Follows the Forest" initiative, the KWA Strategic Plan calls for fencing and managing 25,000 acres in the next ten years. Although the priority for conservation activity is the upper watershed, there is also a need to restore KauaTs native lowland forests which have been largely destroyed by human activity, wildfire, and invasive species. Reestablishment of native habitat could provide scenic values, cultural gathering areas, hiking and other recreational uses, and educational opportunities. Carefully managed forestry efforts also provide opportunities for green energy production, food forests, and materials for local manufacturing. A. PERMITTING AND CODE CHANGE Review State DLNR Forest Reserve Plans when development is adjacent to Forest Reserves. 2. Require best management practices for resource management. B. PLANS AND STUDIES Utilize the Forest Reserve and Natural Area Reserve Plans in Community Planning processes and share information regarding forest management activities with the public. 2. Utilize best practice watershed management plans, such asthe Hanalei Watershed Action Plan, as examples for other communities to employ. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Support projects that restore and protect our remaining endemic forests and landscapes in the upper watershed. 2. Develop collaborative projects that support goals shared by the Forest Reserve Management Plans, County's Open Space Commission, W Ala Hele Commission, the Kaua'i Watershed Alliance, and others. 3. Establish a watershed task force or watershed liaison within the County whose mission is to facilitate better communication and coordination I. THE WATERSHED 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 99 2. KAHAWAI - MIDDLE WATERSHED, DRAINAGE, AND FRESHWATER RESOURCES The rainclouds captured by Kaua'i's lofty peaks, such as Wai'ale'ale and Kawaikini, supply our perennial streams and restore the underground aquifers, upon which we all depend. 2.1 Understanding dour Reliance on Aquifers Kaua'i's aquifer supplies the vast majority of our domesticwater and is divided intothree sectorsthat are comprised of 13 systems (see Figure 3 -2). The systems range in size from 68 square miles in the Makaweli aquifer system to 18 square miles in the Kilauea aquifer system. An estimated 312 million gallons per day (mgd) can be safely withdrawn from the aquifer. This is defined by the Commission on Water Resources Management (CWRM) as sustainable yield .12 Actual withdrawal is a small fraction of total sustainable yield. Total well production on Kaua'i was 14.37 mgd in 2014 compared to an estimated sustainable yield of 312 mgd.13 12 Water Resource Protection Plan, 2008 13 Adequacy of Future Infrastructure Analysis, 2015 The aquifer is fed primarily through rainfall, which ranges from 20 to 400 inches annually across the island. Groundwater recharge is also affected by evapotranspiration, agricultural irrigation water, and streamflow. Studies show that our aquifer sectors have ample water supply forthe island., —Also, Kaua'i has no State - designated Groundwater Management Areas. KALIX I'S AQU I FER SYSTEM CAN SUSTAINABLY PROVIDE AN ESTIMATED 312 MILLION GALLONS OF WATE `-'DAY. fl�R While sustainable yield is adequate, the difficulty and expense of extracting and distributing water are limiting factors in providing water to service new development. In addition, groundwater levels are affected by the combined effects of prolonged drought, withdrawals, and the reduction of agricultural irrigation, as observed by the community to date in the Lihu'e Basin .16 Kaua'i's groundwater quality is good, although certain aquifers are vulnerable to contamination due to their location and /or geological composition. On o a remote island, there are no practical substitutes for groundwater as the primary source of domestic water. Our aquifers depend on continual recharge by seepage from rainfall and stream flows through permeable ground surfaces. In this respect, the quality and quantity of KauaTs groundwater relies upon the same policies and actions that protect watersheds, streams, and water bodies, and reduce nonpoint source pollution. An illustration of the hydrologic cycle can be found in Figure 3 -3. 14 Fukunaga & Associates, County of Kaua'i Water Use & Devel- opment Plan Update (unpublished draft) 15 Technical Memorandum, May 2015 and Sept 2015 updates 16 Effects of Irrigation and Rainfall Reduction on Ground -Water Recharge in the L7hu'e Basin, 2006 I. THE WATERSHED 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 101 2.2 Protecting Drainage Systems and Water Quality The mid - watershed provides an important transfer zone between the upper and lower watershed. It represents the area of greatest alteration from human uses, such as residential development and agriculture. Resource use, waste disposal, sedimentation (as a result of deforestation), and changes in hydrology due to development, dams, and water diversions greatly impact watershed function and water quality. Nonpoint source pollution, commonly called polluted runoff, occurs when rainwater moves on the surface of the earth or through the ground carrying the pollutants it encounters along the way. This polluted runoff flows to drainage systems and ends up impairing streams and nearshore coastal waters. Significant pollutant types include sediment, nutrients, toxins, pathogens, litter, and debris. The consequences of nonpoint source pollution include: increased risk of disease from water recreation, algae blooms, fish kills, destroyed aquatic habitats, and turbid waters. Some polluted runoff is from natural sources, like soil eroding on steep slopes during heavy rain. Most, however, results from human activity on the land. Protecting water quality from both nonpoint and point sources is a collective regulatory responsibility involving all levels of government. Federal laws governing water quality and nonpoint source pollution management define specific standardsthat must be met to avoid sanctions. State government is the lead authority for carrying out Federal water quality mandates. The Department of Health oversees adherence to safe drinking water standards and collaborates with the State's Coastal Zone Management Program to address nonpoint source pollution requirements. The State also has primary responsibilities for watersheds through DLNR's management of State Conservation District lands. The County's primary responsibilities for water protection are associated with its authority over State Land Use Urban District land uses, County ordinances regulating construction activities, management of nine potable water systems, and its shared authority with the State for the Agricultural District. Most nonpoint source water pollution on Kaua'i is due to erosion from lower elevation development - related activities, such as agriculture and from grading, grubbing, and stockpiling. Potential runoff from these activities are regulated by County Government through its zoning and , permitting authority, such as the ordinances for subdivision, flood control, drainage, and grading. 3 2.3 Protecting Perennial Streams and o Instream Flow Kaua'i has 30 perennial streams, or streams that consistently flow year round. Of this number, 21 (70 Y percent) were impaired in 2014.11 Historically, these streams were the pristine habitat for communities ' of native fish (6 1opu), insects, and snails, but stream ✓ diversions and introduced species, such as guppies and swordtail, have led to the decline of many native species. Water in many of KauaTs perennial streams was diverted during the Plantation Era for agricultural purposes. With the decline and abandonment of the plantation economy, the status of these historic diversions is now in limbo. In order to determine the legal status of existing diversions, the State Water Code requires an assessment of a stream's instream flow. The development of instream flow standards (IFS) is a scientific process which analyzes hydrologic conditions and non - stream uses. Continued stream diversion and the lack of IFS, along with decreasing stream levels in some areas, are issues of concern for some communities. Where development is concerned, buffers near perennial streams should be implemented and green infrastructure should be encouraged to reduce nonpoint pollution. 2.4 Utilizing Community Partnerships in Water Management Water resource conservation and protection can be further strengthened through community participation. Organizations and volunteers play significant roles in protecting vital water resources through partnerships with government agencies. Greater awareness of water resource issues helps drive attention and resources to address problems. Making KauaTs water quality everyone's kuleana ensures the greatest amount of vigilance to maintaining standards and preserving these irreplaceable resources for future generations (See Subsectors on Water and Agriculture in Chapter 3). 17 State of Hawai'i Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report, 2014 I. THE WATERSHED 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 103 A. PERMITTING AND CODE CHANGE 1. Avoid impacts to natural hydrologic recharge areas, stream corridors, floodplains, and wetlands through standards that: a. Guide development to avoid disturbance of natural drainage features, preserve wetlands and streams, and provide riparian buffer areas to prevent land disturbance and filter runoff. b. Require best management practices designed to control stormwater and polluted runoff. c. Ensure drainage systems are properly sized, built, and maintained. d. Incorporate trees, rain gardens, swales, green roofs, and other features that mimic natural systems. 2. Reduce erosion and retain sediment onsite during and after construction. 3 2 5 Ensure that Good Agricultural Practices and other runoff reduction measures are addressed when reviewing agricultural grading permit exemptions. Review and update drainage regulations and the drainage constraint district to incorporate and encourage green infrastructure concepts. If large detention basins are required to control drainage, design them for multiple uses and treat them as an important tool. 6. Utilize existing Water Management Plans as examples of best management practices. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. In Community Plans, include protection actions for streams and inland water bodies to prevent 104 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN degradation of water quality and address non - point source pollution. 2. Establish a drainage system database to better understand the drainage network on Kaua'i and to assist with water quantity and quality impacts. 3. Periodically review County's flood control measures and plans using updated information and forecasts on climate change. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Utilize green infrastructure concepts and best management practices in County projects. 2. Mark stormwater drains as "going to the ocear ✓ D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS n. 1. Collaborate with community groups and stakeholders to better manage water resources in a cooperative fashion, avoiding adversarial fights that can divide the community. 2. Encourage collaborative watershed and stream protection through the efforts of non - profit and volunteer environmental groups, such as the Hanalei Watershed Hui and Kaua'i Watershed Alliance. 3. Develop instream flow standards for KauaTs perennial streams, with a focus on the existing project to develop standards for Southeast Kauai. 4. Maintain stream flows by periodically removing excessive debris and vegetation from stream channels and beds that can impede drainage. 5. Monitor the quality of coastal and inland waterbodies, using an operational groundwater - level monitoring network and a stream monitoring network, to ensure compliance with instream flow standards. 3, KAHAKAI - COASTAL AREAS AND SHORELINES Kaua'i's coastal areas.- - including beaches, the shoreline, and near -shore waters --are heavily used by residents and visitors. Protecting and preserving the coast and its waters is essential to sustaining our communities, economy, and way of life. This will require retaining and improving the coast's valued characteristics which include good water quality, sandy beaches, abundant marine life, scenic views, and public access. However, coastlines are dynamic by nature and face constant threats from development, erosion, hurricanes, and tsunamis. Effective management can minimize negative impacts and help preserve coastal areas for the use and enjoyment of current and future generations. 3.1 Addressing Human - Caused Coastal Erosion Centuries of erosion have shaped KauaTs 90 miles of coastline resulting in dramatic contrasts from the Na Pali cliffs to the low -lying wetlands of the Mana Plain. While Kaua'i has only 12 percent of the State's coastline, it has more than one -third of its beach sand including the longest stretch of beach in Hawai'i. However, approximately 70 percent of our beaches are eroding and Kaua'i has lost an estimated four miles of beach over the past century.18 Although erosion is a naturally occurring force, the human contribution to beach erosion includes coastal development and coastal armoring, which exacerbates sand loss and the narrowing of beaches. Such structures cover approximately ten percent of the shoreline. Sea level 18 Anderson et a.. 2015 rise, which is accelerating worldwide due to global warming, is another human contribution to beach erosion. 3.2 Protecting Coastal and Near -Shore Habitats KauaTs shorelines and near -shore waters support a wide range of terrestrial and marine species. These include several threatened and endangered seabird species, marine mammals such as Hawaiian monk seals, sea turtles, and whales. The north and east coasts have shallow fringing coral reefs, while the reefs on the west and south sides are less continuous. These marine habitats require good water quality and healthy coral reefs. Both are susceptible to sediment runoff from erosion and flooding as well as the discharge of pollutants generated from agriculture, businesses, households, and wastewater. The impacts to these habitats from climate change are discussed below. 3.3 Planning for Climate Change Impacts to Coastal Areas Climate change is altering and aggravating natural forces such as sea level rise, rainfall patterns, high wave events, hurricanes, extreme tidal events, and beach erosion (see Figure 3 -4). Ocean warming and acidification will continue to progressively impact KauaTs coastal waters and shorelines. Based on the best available science, we should plan for three feet of sea level rise by 2100. It is important to note that this estimate may be conservative, as some studies project upwards of six feet of sea level rise by 2100. The greatest uncertainty surrounding the projections concern the rate and magnitude of ice sheet loss primarily from Greenland and West Antarctica. This is also dependent on worldwide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Infrastructure and private development built today can be expected to still be in place in the second half of this century when several feet of sea level rise becomes possible. Therefore, it is important to utilize planning approaches that are adaptive in nature, such as scenario -based planning. Future sea level rise and ocean warming will greatly impact different types of coastal habitats, including intertidal areas, wetlands, estuaries, lagoons, tidal marshes and flats, and tidally influenced streams and rivers. Shorelines may migrate inland, moving sediment -rich backshore areas along with them. If coastal development impedes that migration, this sediment could be eroded, impacting coastal water quality and beaches. Wetland areas that play a vital role in filtering water flow to the ocean will also be L THE WATERSHED 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 105 A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE 3. Promote strategic beach nourishment in public CHANGES use areas. 1. Minimize coastal hazard risks through planning and development standards that: a. Ensure the safety of individuals, families, and communities within coastal hazard areas and communicate the dangers to residents and tourists, b. Discourage development or redevelopment (including tourist uses) within hazardous areas, while preserving adequate space for expected future growth in areas located outside these areas;' c. If hazard risks are unavoidable, minimize hazard risks to new development overthe life of authorized structures.; . d. Ensure property owners assume the risks associated with new development in hazardous areas, e. Limit development near vulnerable water supplies; and, f. Manage water supply issues resulting from saltwater intrusion, such as limits on groundwater withdrawal or diversification of water supplies. 2. Avoid or minimize coastal resource impacts through development standards that: a. Protect public beach, rocky coasts, dune, wetland, river, and stream resources in all coastal planning and regulatory decisions. b. Protect the quality of coral reefs through standards that address, prevent, and minimize impacts from development. c. Minimize impacts to view corridors from roads or public places to the ocean and from mauka to makai. d. Preserve and protect KauaTs sandy beaches and shorelines from erosion and degradation while ensuring continued public access to them. e. Ensure adequate parking and convenient public access to coastal lands in all zoning and subdivision permits. 4. Seek to preserve natural beach processes and avoid the construction of shoreline protection structures. 5. Do not allow permanent armoring of the shoreline. b. Include the following guidelines for coastal development in the CZO: a. For resorts and other multi building complexes, transition from low building heights along the shoreline to taller buildings on the interior of the property. b. Provide an open, vegetated visual buffer between the shoreline and buildings. c. Protect community accessways laterally along the coast in the buffer zone mauka of the shoreline. d. Maintain existing stands of trees or plant trees within the buffer zone to provide sun and wind protection and to moderate the appearance of large buildings. 7. Update the Shore District in relation to the SMA regulations. 8. Continually incorporate new information on climate change into shoreline policies and regulations. B. PLANS AND STUDIES Restore lost and unrecorded beach accessv.. by identifying, recording, and demarcating accessways for public use. 2. Develop detailed hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessments in low lying coastal areas based on future data and forecasts regarding climate change. Use this assessment to identify where resources and planning efforts should be focused and to develop adaptation strategies and inform stakeholders including tourists of these dangers. 3. Recognize scientific uncertainty by using scenario planning and adaptive management techniques that adjust policies and rules based on monitoring efforts. I. THE WATERSHED 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 107 4. Analyze options and criteria for relocation of development outside of hazardous areas along the coast and incorporate findings into a long- term relocation plan. 5. Support studies to assess impacts to coastal and cultural resources at Salt Pond Beach and Pu'olo Point in collaboration with community members, including but not limited to the salt making practitioners. C. PROGRAMS 1. Adequately fund and utilize the Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Fund to actively acquire shoreline lands and accessways for public use and consider development of an "Offer To Dedicate" (OTD) Coastal Easement or Land Banking Program. 2. Acknowledge, support, and participate in government, university, and private efforts to better understand and predict climate change impacts on coastal areas. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Manage local marine resources through community based strategies, such as the Ha'ena Community Based Subsistence Fishing Area. 2. Address loss of beach areas due to sea level rise through a comprehensive beach management strategy, including local financing plans for beach and dune restoration. 3. Encourage citizen groups to take responsibility for water resource monitoring and protection, such as through the expansion of the Makai Watch Program. 4. Adopt tax policies favorable to public shoreline access. NOTE: ► -emove_ 4h►s word 5. Dissuade against beach driving through enforcement and educating drivers about the laws, safety, and environmental and cultural impacts of driving on beaches. 108 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 4. THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Kaua'i is a global hotspot for biodiversity. Biodiversity allows ecosystems to function and thrive, and its loss negatively impacts water supply, food security, and resilience to extreme events. Kaua'i has experienced a dramatic loss of animal, plant, and marine species in modern times. This is a statewide trend which has earned Hawai'i the dubious honor of "Endangered Species Capital of the World." 4.1 Saving our Natural Heritage As the oldest and most isolated of the eight main Hawaiian islands, KauaTs unique geological and climatic conditions host hundreds of plants and animals that are found nowhere else, including over 140 plant and animal species that are on the Federal endangered species list. Among these are several threatened and endangered birds, such as the 'Ua'u (Hawaiian Petrel), 'go (Newell's Shearwater), and NE,ne (Hawaiian Goose), as well as six forest birds that are found nowhere else on earth. Since their arrival on Kaua'i, people have depended on the natural world to survive and thrive. However, with an increasing population and modern technology, the relative balance that people had with their environment has deteriorated. Currently, many species are threatened by habitat reduction, disturbance, predation, overexploitation, and other human - introduced dangers. Without educated decision- making about how we expand and grow, wildlife will suffer. Already, human presence has caused over half of the species that existed here in pre - colonization times to become extinct. It is our responsibility to ensure that we provide for the r� u v� continued presence of the remaining 50 percent. Preservation and protection of the growing number of endangered species requires a comprehensive approach through direct and indirect measures to ensure KauaTs natural legacy endures. 4.2 Countering the Threat of Invasive Species Invasive species threaten our environment, agriculture, human health, and quality of life. They represent a constant and evolving threat to KauaTs environment particularly to the island's already vulnerable endangered species. If left unchecked, invasive species can easily thrive and multiply in KauaTs hospitable environment, out - competing native life, and jeopardizing our watersheds. Expanding global trade and travel, climate change, and unpredictable biological evolution are major factors driving the introduction and establishment of invasive species. Prevention, containment, and eradication of invasive species require persistent and coordinated attention by all levels of government as well as cooperation by businesses and the community. Port of entry controls are a critical method for preventing the introduction of invasive species. Airport and harbor inspections must occur regularly to prevent new threats from gaining a foothold on Kauai. Efforts to date have thus far prevented ecologically destructive invasive species such as snakes, mongoose, the varroa mite, coqui frogs, and little fire ants from establishing lasting footholds on Kaua'i. Other invasive species such as miconia and feral cats are established on the island and require effective management and containment strategies to minimize their impacts. Feral cats are also a public concern as they carry toxoplasmosis, a disease that enters the water supply from cat feces and has been documented to kill marine animals such as the endangered Hawaiian monk seal. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Avoid development or land use intensification on critical habitats and in areas that are essential to the health, safety, and life of vulnerable native species. 2. Require the use of noninvasive plant species for landscaping of newly developed areas, public lands, and roadways. 3. Require future development to address potential impacts on threatened or endangered flora and fauna: a. Evaluate potential loss of habitat. b. Identify all endangered and threatened species present. c. List minimization efforts. d. If mitigation is needed, join an established Habitat Conservation Plan or develop one. 4. Encourage new development to implement voluntary actions to encourage a net gain in protection efforts of our threatened and endangered species. 5. Minimize risks to threatened and endangered species in construction and development activity. B. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Increase wildlife and habitat protection knowledge and expertise within the County government. 2. Develop a protocol that will help minimize the current feral cat population, to lessen the impact of direct endangered species fatalities, as well as the spread of diseases, such as toxoplasmosis. 3. Adopt comprehensive animal control ordinance to reduce or eliminate populations of feral, abandoned, and stray cats. 4. Develop a list of native plant species suitable for landscaping. I. THE WATERSHED 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 109 C. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 2 3 0 Provide enforcement and education regarding endangered species regulations. Provide interpretation within protected areas to educate people about native flora and fauna. Design and install signage informing motorists and pedestrians aboutthe presence of threatened or endangered species in wildlife hazard zones and during yearly times of increased danger. Utilize predator -proof fencing and new technology to protect endangered species, such as seabirds, from lights and powerlines. Complete and implement native species Habitat Conservation Plans, such as the Kaua'i Seabird Habitat Conservation Plan and the Kaua'i N2n2 Habitat Conservation Plan, which address legal issues regarding human - wildlife interaction while allowing for economic development. Protect and restore forest bird corridors, seabird flyways, waterbird habitat, and areas of monk seal loafing. 7. Promote greater protection of KauaTs native flora and fauna biodiversity by reducing the threats of invasive species; a. Rapidly identify and address invasive species on County lands and coordinate with other public and private landowners to control sources of invasive species. b. Track invasive species and focus attention on the most damaging, persistent, and emerging invasive species from other islands in Hawai'i that have not yet become established on Kaua'i c. Collaborate with State and local partners, such as the Kaua'i Invasive Species Committee, on comprehensive biosecurity strategies at ports of entry to prevent invasive species, such as the mongoose, from spreading to Kaua'i. 110 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN d. Support State, County, and non - profit organization efforts to control invasive species, identify and address invasive species on County lands, and coordinate with other public and private landowners to control sources of invasive species through the work of DLNR, the Hawai'i Invasive Species Council (HISC), the Kaua'i Invasive Species Committee (KISC), the Kaua'i Watershed Alliance (KWA), and others. e. Increase public awareness of specific invasive species threats through both targeted and wide- scale campaigns, as appropriate to the nature and geographic extent of individual threats. Focus attention on,what's at stake and whom to contact for invasive species detection. 8. Acquire shoreline areas that could serve as refugia for species impacted by sea level rise or areas that could be appropriate sites for coastal habitat creation or restoration. 9. Utilize conservation easements and partnerships with land trusts to acquire natural areas and promote mitigation banking. 10. Promote protection, restoration, and identification of critical habitats for our native, threatened, and endangered flora and fauna through the following actions: a. Regularly evaluate and update a database listing environmental resource sites. b. Identify specific areas of habitat across the island that are in need of more heightened protection and /or restoration. c. Protect and restore existing wetlands that serve as critical habitats for existing species. d. Require developers and land -users to provide a protection buffer around existing habitats and wetlands. e. Encourage more reforestation and native flora outplantings across the island to help increase and enhance habitats. f. Preserve and establish connectivity between existing habitats and critical areas of interest. 11. Ensure adequate inspection and review of shipments that may contain invasive species. 12. In schools, develop programs that improve education and awareness of: a. The role of native species and the importance of biodiversity in Hawai'i. b. Projects that support invasive species eradication and protection of endangered and threatened species. 13. Protect endangered species through programs, including but not limited to the Mana Plain Wetland Restoration Project, Kilauea Point National Wildlife Refuge, Kaua'i Endangered Seabird Recovery Project, and Kaua'i Forest Bird Recovery Project. Blossoms from a native'Ohi'a lehua tree, Upper Wailua River, East Kaua'i District. I. THE WATERSHED 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 711 Affordable housing development, Hanama'ulu, Lihu'e District SECTOR- 11* HOUSING Declining housing affordability for locals has reached a crisis level with far - ranging social impacts. Home prices exceed 300 percent of the national average while affordable market rentals are few and far between. New development and an inclusionary zoning ordinance have not improved the situation. At the household level, high housing costs cause stress, reduce disposable income, and limit transportation options. These impacts are felt community -wide. They contribute to a stressed local economy and frayed social fabric. The £complexity of the housing crisis must be addressed on multiple levels if Kaua'i is to achieve its vision and become a place where housing for all ages and income levels is integrated into all communities and located close to work and recreation. 4 Z Understanding the High Cost of Housing Many complex factors drive housing costs. These include slow inventory growth, limited developable land, a lengthy entitlement process, and high 112 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN infrastructure and construction costs. The off- island market, willing to pay a premium for Kaua'i property, is another factor driving high costs. Recent major development on residential -zoned land, such as Kukui'ula and Po'ipu Kai, take advantage of this market. Between January 2008 and September2015, 45% of homes sold were purchased by mainland and 1.2 Supporting County -Led Affordable Housing Programs and Projects The Kaua'i County Housing Agency implements a variety of programs designed to promote homeownership, expedite the permitting of affordable housing, and support housing rehabilition. Sources of funds that are potentially available to address housing needs include: Low- Income Housing Tax Credits, HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development) Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME (Home Investment Partnerships Program) and CDBG (Community Development Block Grants) programs, USDA Rural Development programs, private foundations, State CIP funds, and County Bond funds. Federal funds are very prescriptive in terms of household income categories served. In contrast, locally established and funded programs can be customized to serve those who fall between the Federal programs and market -rate units. Through active partnerships with landowners and affordable housing developers, the Housing Agency has helped move forward several 100% affordable Zi housing projects in Uhu'e, Hanama'ulu, Princeville Jand Koloa, constructing over 300 affordable rental units since 2000. A new initiative underway is the Lima Ola affordable housing project. This is a master - planned community that will provide over ✓ 400 affordable units in E_le'ele. In addition to moving forward with Lima Ola, the County should acquire land with access to transit, water, and wastewater service for future project' \development. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Increase the supply of affordable rental and multi- family housing by implementing the Housing Ordinance. 2. Locate future public housing projects in or near existing job centers so travel times and transportation costs can be reduced. 3. Support economically integrated communities by requiring affordable housing mandates to be met on site. 4. Amend Ordinance 860, Workforce Housing, to incentivize the creation of affordable housing development. 5. Preserve existing affordable housing stock. b. Design affordable residential projects with civic spaces, shade trees, and pedestrian /bicycle amenities to enhance livability, equity, and safe transit options, especially for children. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Expand and preserve existing affordable housing stock through methods such as rent stabilization or rent control policies. 2. Review existing affordable housing requirements in plans and zoning amendments to assess impediments to affordable housing creation. 3. Assess the County's affordable housing needs and priorities through the five -year Consolidated Plan and one -year Action Plans. 4. Establish a ratio for the housing needs for workforce, elderly, and disabled households, and amend existing laws and plans as needed. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Complete the Lima Ola affordable housing project. 2. Seek and acquire land in or near town centers with access to transit, domestic water, and sewer for future affordable housing development. 3. Create dedicated sources of funding and continue to use the Housing Revolving Fund to finance affordable housing projects. 4. Develop and rehabilitate affordable housing low- interest loan programs and awards, such as the Rental Housing Revolving Fund through the Hawai'i Housing Financing and Development Corporation. 5. Support the housing needs of low income households through the Federal Housing Assistance Payments Program (Section 8). b. Support a flexible planning process and robust monitoring system to allow timely changes in strategy and resource allocation for the housing program. 7. Develop a quasi - public housing development or redevelopment agency to support affordable housing projects, particularly infill housing development projects within town centers. II. HOUSING 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 115 D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Provide the highest level of housing and community development assistance through partnerships and non - profit organizations such as a Community Land Trust. 2. INFILL HOUSING Infill development, or housing located within existing communities, can expand our housing inventory without consuming precious open space. It may be less expensive than "greenfield" development because it utilizes existing infrastructure and services. Infill housing has the potential to play an important role in meeting future housing needs, but only if the zoning, infrastructure, and built environment can support,a higher density,,environment. It should also be appropriately scaled to the character of individual tq� wns. 1 ` rnmmuhi + ieS 2.1 Countering the Threat of Residential Sprawl Decentralized development or residential sprawl onto agricultural and open -zoned land erodes our rural character and town centers. Such development requires automobile dependence, which burdens our limited road network. It also incurs a greater cost per household for infrastructure and services. Expansion of this type of development will run counter to an environmentally and fiscally sustainable future. It also undermines the goal of preserving agricultural lands and the open spaces that separate towns. 116 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 2.2 Supporting Infill Development and "Missing Middle" Housing The alternativeto sprawl focuses new development in existing towns in order to leverage existing physical and social infrastructure while preserving vital open space. This fosters town centers that support infill housing and mixed use environments. For example, town centers should be centered on functional and attractive shared spaces where people can live, work, and play in the same area. Priority infill areas include the major employment centers of Lihu'e and Koloa. However, with the exception of hazard areas, additional infill growth should be encouraged in all towns. Enabling this environment means creating or adapting planning and zoning requirements in a manner that will stimulate private investment in new or renovated structures. Additional dwelling units (ADUs) (also called 'ohana units) are one example. ADUs are smaller and less expensive to construct, offering a County- sanctioned private sector option towards increasing housing in existing communities. ADUs are allowed on residentially zoned lots where one home is permitted. Although previously permitted, new ADUs are not allowed on agricultural or open lands unless approvals were secured before 2007. Infill development can further diversify KauaTs housing stock through "missing middle" housing in walkable communities. "missing middle" housing is characterized by small - scale, multi -unit housing types such as duplexes, fourplexes, bungalow courts, and mansion apartments, and can be integrated into communities with single - family homes. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Support the development of a limited amount of housing on agricultural land for farm workers and their families by: a. Improving the existing process to obtain Farm Worker Housing Permits and remove barriers to participation. b. Providing outreach on the Farm Worker Housing Law to increase participation. 5. HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS The State Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) owns 20,565 acres on Kauai, primarily in the East Kauai, Hanapepe, rEle'ele, and Lihu'e Planning Districts (see landowner maps in Appendix E). DHHL works to ensure that native Hawaiian families have homes and land to call their own. 5.1 Implementing the Kaua'i Island Plan DHHL defines beneficiaries as all Native Hawaiians (50 percent or more Hawaiian) and their successors, including existing lessees, applicants on the wait list, and Native Hawaiians who have not applied for a homestead award. The DHHUs mission is to develop and deliver land to Native Hawaiians. Prince Jonah Kuhi6 Kalaniana'ole, who led the passage of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1921, advocated 'aina ho'opulapula, protecting the Native Hawaiian population. 'Aina ho'opulapula involves creating self - sufficiency and planning for the future through investing in resources, such as education and housing. The DHHL Kauai Island Plan (2004) designates three remmov, 2 •spaces priority tracts for residential development: Wailua, Hanapepe, and Anahola /'jKamalomalo'o. These areas can accommodate a total of 2,351 residential lots of 10,000 square feet each, along with 84 acres of community space. Of high priority is a total of 621 lots to be developed across the three areas. Anahola is currently under development, but buildout has been slower than expected. Wailua will be the next priority area, although there is no timetable for development. The General Plan Land Use Maps incorporate the DHHL high priority growth areas. As of 2014, there were a total of 1,621 applicants on DHHL's Kaua'i waitlist. 24The 2008 DHHL Lessee Survey (prepared by SMS Research)found prevalant issues on homestead lands: overcrowding, aging infrastructure and homes, and the inability of homesteaders to finance expansion and repairs. The high costs of construction on Kaua'i also make even simple homes out of reach for many DHHL beneficiaries. A. PLANS AND STUDIES Integrate the recommendations of DHHL plans into Community Planning. B. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Partner with DHHL on infrastructure projects which will support development of both County and DHHL priority growth areas. 2. Partner with DHHL to relocate the Wailua Wastewater Treatment Plant out of the tsunami zone and to support future residential development on DHHL land. C. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS Respect and support the mission of DHHL to prioritize planning for their beneficiaries. 24 DHHL Applicant Waiting List, 2014. The 2008 DHHL Lessee Survey (prepared by SMS Research) II. HOUSING 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 119 a I � 10 6. ELDERLY HOUSING AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES On Kaua'i, kupuna (the Hawaiian word for elders or grandparents) are honored for their life experience and wisdom. Kaua'i has a relatively high median age and a higher percentage of older adults than the State as a whole. Many older residents are retired or semi - retired, and have more limited income streams than working adults. Adequate and affordable housing is a significant component in overall quality of life for elderly people. Of particular importance is the supply of affordable rental housing for seniors. 6.1 Readying for "The Silver Tsunami" A sign ificantdemogra phi cshift isoccurring on Kaua'i. Kaua'i County already has the highest proportion of older adults compared to its total population of any County in Hawai'i.25The proportion of Kaua'i residents over 65 years is projected to rise from 10 percent in 2010 to 30 percent in 2035, which will effectively double the number of older adult households on Kaua'i. The impacts of an aging population include increased demand for healthcare and social services. It also places a strain on the workforce_- especially if the workforce growth is stagnant. CLOSE TO ONE THIRD OF KAUA'I'S POPULATION WILL BE 65 AND OVER IN 2035 25 Hawai'i State Plan on Aging, 2011 120 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 6.2 Supporting Kupuna- Friendly Communities One of the State's goals for HawaiTs aging population is to, "Enable older adultsto remain in their own homes with a high quality of life for as long as possible through the provision of home and community based services, including supports for family caregivers "a6 This goal, . >." also known as "Aging in Place," is best served by having senior housing near social and medical services, shopping, and basic services. Unfortunately, development patterns and zoning laws are sometimes barrierstokupuna- friendlycommunities. Most homes are segregated from commercial areas and require automobile trips to shopping and medical services. Many neighborhoods do not have safe connections for walking with supportive devices, such as a cane orwheelchair. There are many neighborhood parks that do not have accessible outdoor gathering spaces for kupuna to meet and gather in a shady place. Zoning and development standards must be updated so new communities are designed to allow kupuna to age in place. We need to increase alternatives for older adults to "downsize" in the communitiesAthey live, reside in multigenerational households, and have options to move to high - quality assisted living facilities. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Provide additional housing and assisted living facilities for KauaTs increasing elderly population by: a. Increasing the supply of housing that is affordable, accessible to services, and promotes aging in place. b. Allow multigenerational housing that accommodates family home care situations. c. Revising development standards to facilitate approval of assisted living units and continuing care communities. 2. Integrate universal design standards into KauaTs building code. 26 Hawai'i State Plan on Aging, 2011 u s 3 ,s is Hardy Street, L7hu'e District SECTOR- Me LAND TRANSPORTATION Kaua'i is at a crossroads for its future transportation. Traffic congestion is one of the community's most frequently expressed concerns, and it impacts nearly everyone on Kaua'i. The island's topography, overall constrained financial resources, repair and maintenance backlog of existing roads and bridges, and General Plan goals of sustainability, resiliency, and health all underscore the need to achieve more efficiency and effectiveness with Kaua'i's existing transportation system and to spend Kaua'i's limited transportation funds wisely, and seek additional funding from Federal, State, and private partners. NOTE 9uotaiim ►na✓ks A Balanced System ho+ (+e c►zd rr » 1V The term balanced systen -P recognizes the importance of safely accommodating all roadway users, the need to make strategic investments, and that transportation and land use are linked, each with implications for the other. In 2013, the County Council adopted the Multimodal Land Transportation Plan (MLTP) which outlines steps the County of Kaua'i will take to achieve a balanced multimodal transportation system through the planning horizon year of 2035. The MLTP reviews existing conditions and trends and proposes programs and scenarios for roadway networks, bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities, and transit. It also discusses how land use relates to transportation. In order to address congestion, manage growth, reinforce compact land use III. LAND TRANSPORTATION 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 123 patterns, and address sustainability goals, the MLTP was used as a framework for transportation policies in this General Plan. The MLTP proposed significant mode shift targets by 2035, primarily a reduction in Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) travel and increases in transit, walking, and biking modes (Figure 3 -6). While reduced, SOV trips are still projected to be the largest share of total trips. Implementation of the MLTP will result in far- reaching outcomes that support many of the goals of this plan. These include reduced energy consumption, reduced household transportation costs, increased levelsof physical activity,and im proved transportation choice, especially for those who cannot drive. Accomplishing these targets will require strategic implementation of specific projects and actions, as well as a`'cultural shift' in personal transportation choices. A shift in personal transportation choices occurring overtime is supported by nationwide trends, including the following: • Decline or delay in personal car ownership by millennials • Willingness by millennials to use transit and other modes of transportation • Prevalence of new transportation services, such as Uber and Lyft • New "apps" that link private and public transit services and Nawiliwili Harbor, the HDOT is a key partner in KauaTs land transportation network. Thinking of our transportation network as an integrated system will require continued collaboration between the County and the State in planning across jurisdictions and across modes. The transportation actions discussed in this section reflect the importance of partnership and the need to consider our land transportation system as an integrated network. The actions are organized by the following six programs: A. General B. County Roads C. Transit D. Pedestrian E. Bicycle F. Parking Management Figure 3 -6 Multimodal Land Transportation Plan 2035 Goals • Desire of both millennials and baby- boomers Single- Occupant to live in walkable communities close to work Vehicle and shopping 2010 • Increase in telecommuting and office sharing Vehicle �0,`•,h • Increase in the "shared economy," including x x 4. ride - share, car - share, and bike -share service �� .,& 1a�� S� ado • Increased recognition of the link between y a transportation choices and climate change Cif • Increased awareness of the relationship s 2020 "D. a between health and transportation � �)0 o While not all national trends may be currently prevalent on Kaua'i, it is anticipated that both public and private transportation services linked to technological advances will affect KauaTs transportation system over the General Plan's timeframe. 2035 As the jurisdiction responsible for KauaTs belt highways and major roads leading to the airport 124 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 4.5% 7 riO /n n cni_ 7.6% ■ Single- Occupant Vehicle Multi- Occupant Vehicle Transit Walk Bicycle 1. GENERAa Solutions for the future sustainability and reliability of KauaTs transportation network lie in providing a balanced system with multiple modes, including freight, cars, transit, walking, and biking. 1.1 Managing congestion requires a multi - pronged approach Traffic congestion, particularly on our belt highways, is a primary concern of our residents. Historically, efforts to address congestion have focused solely on adding capacity for motor vehiclesthrough widening existing roads and building new roads. These types of projects are costly, can be environmentally sensitive, and often take years or even decades to complete, if they are ever undertaken at all. The State's Federal Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Kaua'i identified $3.2 billion in proposed roadway projects, with anticipated funding of $600 million over 20 years. This approach to addressing congestion is simply not sustainable.A new approach is needed that focuses on managing congestion through a combination of smaller, quicker roadway projects, shifts some trips away from SOVs to other modes (transit, walking, and biking), and reduces trip demand by focusing housing near jobs, schools, services, and parks. At the same time, the backlog of existing roads and bridges in need of maintenance and repair has grown. The longer it takes to address road maintenance, the more costly it becomes as roads move from needing a simple resurfacing to a more extensive reconstruction. With two agencies responsible for our roadway system (HDOTfor our belt highways, and the County of Kaua'i Department of Public Works for our County roads), close collaboration is needed to assure we are all working toward the same end goal. In addition pto coordination between these two agencies, venues ,6 are needed for public dialog, education, enhancing -p partnerships, and brainstorming of creative ideas for funding and implementation of our transportation system. The Built Environment Task Force of Get Fit Kaua'i is an ideal venue for this continued discussion. Given the reality of limited funding, strategic investment choices will need to be made. These choices can be based on a series of principles that are articulated in the General Plan, and include the following: • Prioritize the repair and maintenance of existing roads over construction of new road, ✓ • When new roads are planned and constructed, focus on enhancing roadway network and connectivity, and improving resilience' , • When feasible, to minimize additional costs, consider and incorporate roadway improvements for all modes at the time of roadway resurfacing; • Where feasible, as a means to reduce cost and shorten timelines for implementation, consider "least cost planning" and "practical design" for corridor planning. As an example, focus on spot improvements and intersection modifications to manage congestion prior to considering corridor -long multi -lane widening projects. • Consider the safety of all users in planning and design. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Coordinate transportation planning with land use to minimize the impact of growth on congestion, improve walkability in town centers, revitalize commercial areas, and enhance mobility in places where people live, work, learn and play.' 2. Require that transportation impact analysis reports and othertraffic studies analyze a project's potential to encourage mode shift. III. LAND TRANSPORTATION 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 125 1j B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. In all Community Plans, incorporate planning of roadway, transit, bike and pedestrian facilities, and transportation needs to support economic 3 revitalization. 2. Include analysis of the planned transportation system's ability to accommodate proposed growth, manage congestion, and achieve the County's mode shift targets in all Community Plans. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Establish transportation priorities based on the following criteria: a. Support of growth areas as designated in the General Plan and Community Plans b. Support of the County's mode shift targets; , c. Priorities identified in Community Plans and other planning documents d. Safety, with a priority on safety for children; . e. Congestion management; f. Cost in relation to available funds; and, , g. Opportunity to leverage non - County funds. 2. Support completion of the priority projects in the Kapa'a Transportation Solutions Report to include the following: a. Add one lane on the Kuhio Highway from the southern end of the Kapa'a Bypass Road to Kuamo'o Road; b. Widen the northern segment of the Kapa'a Bypass Road to two -lane and two -way from the northern end of the Bypass to the roundabout at Olohena Road; c. Operational improvements, such as signalization and left turn restrictions on Kuhi6 Highway; d. Extension of right turn lane on Haleilio Road at Kuhio Highway; and, 126 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 5. Congestion management on Kuhi6 Highway, from Kuamo'o Road to Kapule Highway. Following a priority evaluation process, complete priority circulation and multimodal capacity projects identified in the General Plan Transportation Maps. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Asa percentage of total trips, increase transittrips to 3.6 %, walk trips to 11.5 %, and bicycle trips to 7.6% by 2035, compared to baseline 2010 data of 0.4% for transit, 4.5% for walk, and 2.0% for bicycle trips. 2. In collaboration with HDOT, develop a policy for consideration of roundabouts on State Highways and County roads. 3. Improve the process of collaboration with HDOT to involve both the County and State in planning, scoping, design, and funding of transportation plans and projects. 4. In collaboration with HDOT, develop a process to apply "least cost planning" and "practical design" into transportation planning and projects with a focus on congestion management for Kuhi6 Highway and Kaumuali'i Highway. Select a pilot project to test the process and outcomes. 5. Restructure the Transportation Coordinating Committee as a working group with representatives from Kaua'i County Long Range Planning, the County's Transportation Planner, Public Works Engineering, Capital Improvement Program Manager, Transportation Agency, and H DOT. 6. Identify and actively seek non - County revenue sources (Federal, State, and private) to supplement County funding of the transportation network. 7. Enhance community partnerships for roadway maintenance (including landscaping) and education of all roadway users. 8. Continue to support the Built Environment Task Force of Get Fit Kaua'i as a primary venue for public discussion of funding and implementing our land transportation system. ? .COUNTY ROADS County roads and local streets will continue to be the primary way that people and goods move around the island, but they cannot accommodate unlimited growth. Maintaining roads so that they safely and efficiently handle vehicles, buses, and other modes of transportation is essential to a future with less time spent in traffic and fewer vehicle trips. County roads are under the jurisdiction of the County of Kaua'i. They do not include roads and highways that are under the jurisdiction of the Hawai'i Department of Transportation. This section applies only to roads under the jurisdiction of the County. 2.1 Preserving our Island's Character and Advancing Opportunity Along with addressing congestion, other concerns of our community include preserving KauaTs character, promoting economic development, and providing access for everyone to education, jobs, and services, regardless of age or physical ability. Our County roads system plays a big role in addressing these concerns. When the only way to get around is by car, large segments of our population are left out, due to age, physical ability, or socio- economic conditions. Providing housing near jobs, education, and services, with a safe and convenient transportation network that accommodates transit, walking, and biking, allows everyoneto be connected. Retrofitof existing County roads can also be a catalyst for economic development, by creating inviting places for socialization and commerce. How various modes are accommodated is achieved through street design and is key to preserving the character of our island. In town settings, sidewalks and bike lanes may be needed. In slow- speed, low - volume settings, it may be appropriate for all users to share the street without special allocation for each user. The design of each street needs to take into account the function of the street, space available, adjacent land use, and the character of surroundings. This is called "context sensitive design'; and is critical T))" to preserving a sense of place. New street design standards are being developed by the County incorporating these principles to accommodate all users in different settings. On many local roads, residents express concerns about motorists speeding. This can be dangerous for all road users, and can discourage people from walking and biking. Sometimes streets are designed to accommodate a much higher speed than the posted speed limit, which encourages speeding. Designing streets to the desired speed limit can slow traffic, reduce the need for costly enforcement, and can improve safety for all users. "Traffic calming" is an important strategy to slow down traffic to the desired speed on selected streets. A variety of traffic calming treatments can be used to reduce speeds, and selecting appropriate treatments will vary by location. A traffic calming toolkit can help engineers, public safety officials, and community members consider and evaluate treatments that are suitable for each location. With limited funding, priorities need to be established for road retrofit and construction to best accommodate the needs of all users. III. LAND TRANSPORTATION 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 127 y W Strong and fearless riders are comfortable riding their bikes with cars in nearly all conditions. Based on research in other places, this group comprises less than one percent of the population. Enthused and confident riders are regular commute cyclists who are willing to share the road with motorists but prefer to ride in separate bike lanes or in adequate shoulders. Generally, enthused and confident riders are approximately seven percent of the population. Interested but concerned cyclists have some experience riding bikes and would like to ride more, but feel riding conditions are unsafe. Interested but concerned cyclists generally comprise 60 percent of the population. Local surveys indicate a large portion of our population falls into the interested but concerned categorlDhey would like to ride their bikes more for transportation, but feel that current conditions are unsafe. No way no how, approximately 30 percent of the population, are simply not interested in riding a bike for transportation, no matter the conditions. In order to expand cycling as a viable means of transportation, conditions need to address the safety issues of the "interested but concerned" group: if the road is shared with cars, volumes and speeds need to be low; on higher volume streets, separate bike lanes are needed; in high - volume high -speed corridors, separate bike facilities, such as shared use paths, are needed. Intersection treatments also need to be safe for cyclists. Most importantly, a continuous network is needed that allows cyclists to feel safe getting from Point Ato Point B. Adding bike lanes on a single street does not create a network and will not substantially increase cycling until those bike lanes are connected to other bike facilities. While planning is done at the network level, implementation is typically done incrementally. Community Plans are seen as the ideal scale and community process to establish bicycle networks in all of our districts. For existing road retrofits, as much as possible, implementation should occur in conjunction with other roadway projects, such as resurfacing and reconstruction, to reduce costs. Another key factor is bicycle education. Both cyclists and motorists need to understand their rights and responsibilities of safely sharing the road. Cyclist on Kuhi'o Highway 132 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN infrastructure conditions and estimate future need • The General Plan Update Kaua'i Infrastructure Analysis (2015) describes existing infrastructure systems on Kaua'i. • Assessment of the Adequacy of Kauai Infrastructure for Current and Future Needs (2015) estimates infrastructure needs for the island and by planning district to 2035. These studies identified projected deficits of water and wastewater capacity in some districts, indicating a need for more capacity to accommodate the 2035 population (see Figure 3 -7). Other key findings are summarized in the sub - sections on Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste. Maps showing key infrastructure systems can be found in Section 5.5. This Sector also includes Airports and Harbors, which are critical facilities that support the transport of people and goods to and from Kaua'i. Improving How Infrastructure Supports New Growth Typically, the burden of paying for the infrastructure to service new development falls on the developer. In turn, these costs are carried over to the buyer. In order to alleviate the housing crisis by supporting growth in the desired areas, government will need to help provide this infrastructure. The County should use its ability to invest in infrastructure as a tool to encourage growth where it is desired. However, for this to occur, infrastructure improvements and land use planning will need to be more closely coordinated. We need to look to partnerships to provide the funding needed for new infrastructure required by growth. Examples include the creation of special districts and innovative public - private partnerships. Aligning Facility Plans with the General Plan As a high -level policy document, the General Plan is not a facility plan or master plan. Infrastructure systems run by the County or State are guided by specific plans that provide direction, needs assessment, and capital expenditures for entire systems and individual facilities. Typically, these plans are highly technical and conform to regulatory requirements. However, the update of these specific plans should be guided by the General Plan and align with policies and actions. Moreover, the County 136 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN has limited to no jurisdiction and less involvement in the update of facility plans for privately run systems, such as in Princeville. Given the need to focus and prioritize infrastructure improvements and explore public - private partnerships, Community Plans are an important opportunity to develop district -level guidance on the development and improvement of regional infrastructure. 1. DOMESTIC WATER Kaua'i is endowed with ample water supply in our aquifers, but water distribution is limited by a system that requires expansion to meet projected demands through 2035. 1.1 Reconciling Water Supply and Infrastructure KauaTs aquifers have sufficient sustainable yields to accommodate future growth. The State Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM) has not imposed any Ground Water Management Areas on Kaua'i, which would be required if there were dangers of exceeding sustainable yields in any of our aquifers. The CWRM is expected to issue an updated Water Resource Protection Plan that will have new sustainable yield estimates based on a more cautious approach than previous estimates. 1.2 Improving System Reliability and Addressing Growth KauaTs 2014 groundwater well production exceeded 2011 water consumption by about 3.25 million gallons per day (mgd). Groundwater supplies £ were sufficient within each area except Lihu'e, which 17 supplemented its water needs with Grove; Farms' privately owned system. The Department of Water (DOW) has 13 service areas with approximately 20,500 customers (as of November 2013). The State �c mpaini, 7vic. Department of Health Safe Drinking Water Branch regulates ten private water systems on Kaua'i. These rangefrom large systems owned bythe,Pacific Missile V Range Facility and Princeville Utilities Co. to smaller private systems in Kealia, K6ke'e State Park, Polihale J IQ State Park, .Pakala Village, and the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands water system in Anahola. See Figure 3 -8 for the locations of public and private QQ water service areas on Kaua'i. J Based on future projections, the DOW will need to complete system and facility improvements to address an additional 6.48 mgd of production and supporting facilities by 2035. This includes replacing an estimated 237 miles of pipeline (out of 400 total pipeline miles) due to deterioration, age, and capacity issues. The Water Plan 2020, updated in 2001, is revisited yearly by the Department of Water (DOW) to reprioritize improvements and be in sync with current land development needs. However, the coordination between DOW improvements and long range planning can and must be improved. The lack of coordination has led to inefficiencies and delays as the DOW requires lead time in process permitting and funding. This has had the effect of delaying or even halting construction of new housing and commercial projects. Additionally-, in some areas there are legal challengesthat question the validity of diverting water resources for any purpose based on the publictrust doctrine. Before water and associated facilities for extraction, storage, and distribution can be allocated to support growth, these legal cases and planning gaps need to be addressed. The DOW Water Plan 2020 incorporated housing unit and population forecasts from the 2000 Kaua'i General Plan. The DOW will update its Water Plan 2020 to a 2040 planning horizon after this General Plan is complete, incorporating updated housing unit and population forecasts. The General Plan actions for domestic water support water planning and investments in infrastructure that focus on priority growth areas. They also support measures for water conservation and recycling. General Plan policies and actions that focus growth around existing centers will help to reduce costs associated with watersystem upgrades by minimizing the extent of new water distribution networks that must be built and maintained. 1.3 Enhancing Water Conservation While there is little concern that we will exhaust the water supply in our aquifers, minimizing water demands will conserve existing system capacity and reduce or forestall the need to expand costly water extraction, storage, and transmission /distribution infrastructure. Use of recycled greywater- or rain catchment for irrigation and some types of cleaning is another way to minimize demands on potable water supply. Likewise, more efficient buildings and land use patterns can also reduce overall demand for water. Kaua'i residents have been conserving water over recent years. DOW has a range of historic and recent strategies and measures to encourage water conservation, including 100 percent customer metering, leak detection, plumbing code regulations, and public outreach and education programs. The WaterPlan2020 goals include red.ucing average daily demand by 2.2 million galloris /day and reducing maximum daily demand by 3.2 million gallons. DOW reports that revenues have been dropping annually, most likely due to rate increases that incentivize customers to use less water. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Prioritize increasing domestic water supply, storage, and distribution systems to meet projected needs while encouraging conservation. 2. Prioritize water infrastructure improvements in infill development areas. 3. Encourage alternatives for non - potable water usage, such as rainwater catchment and greywater recycling. 4. Support water savings through land use practices like low impact development (LID), Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource Efficient Land Use, new green building programs, and onsite and offsite conservation land use practices. 5. Conduct an audit of the County's development standards to identify regulations that are obstacles to green infrastructure practices. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Implement and update the County Water Plan to guide system expansion, improvement, rehabilitation, and rate structures to support IV. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 137 Figure 3 -7 Projected Wastewater and Domestic Water Capacity by District in 2035 1 0.5 A 0 0 -0.5 0 2 -1 a o -1.5 M cD 0 2 2 -2.5 -3 Ism Lihu'e N Wastewater South Kaua'i ■ Hanapepe Waimea© CJ'Ele'ele Kekaha ✓ NOTC : adcl SePabr" F" be +Wee*J aUsI-�'I c'*S & m,%kG d e s 1, s4yles CONS is4e*4 North East Shore Kauai Well Water *Positive represents surplus capacity. Negative represents deficit capacity. growth consistent with the General Plan and Community Plans. 2. Reduce potable water usage through recycled water and alternative individual water systems such as rainwater catchment and greywater recycling, and incorporate these into the County Water Plan Update. 3. Determine the sustainable yield of aquifer sectors through the Water Use and Development Plan. 4. Reconcile water service areas with County planning districts to integrate facilities with Community Plans. C. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Encourage water conservation at the individual, business, and municipal [evel. Fe: vels 2. Collaborate with community groups on cooperative approaches to water management. 138 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 2. WASTEWATER, SEPTIC SYSTEMS, AND CESSPOOLS Sustainable growth means providing safe and sanitary wastewater disposal solutions for growing areas and converting communities off of cesspools that create environmental pollution and potential health hazards. Figure 3 -8 Public and Private Water Service Areas E County System E Private System Source: R.M.Towill (2015) A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE 3. Improve the quality of effluent discharged into CHANGES injection wells, especially those in the Special Management Areas. 1. Require large -scale developers to contribute funds toward improved recycled water 4. Support innovative treatment systems that production and distribution, or to construct their produce effluent at appropriate water quality own wastewater reclamation facility. levels to encourage reuse such as irrigation, 2. Manage wastewater treatment and disposal industrial uses, and other non - potable use. in a manner that safeguards human and environmental health, accommodates future growth, is efficient and cost effective, and uses recycled water from treatment where possible. 140 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN H„ HVULEI ,QUA'\ T � wARRA DOM i, NORTH SHORE AWMMACOU KOPM STAIR PAW I I EAST KA '1 'm " ONE" "Im OaoANr NOLA" rfAM PAIR A` pF Ku,MADO wA, �I NAw I WAIMEA w,MUA LIHU'E '' mass y mrArAn . ,�. r FACU •'�,� ! HAruwuUU B.I I FrruD, ..I KOM M &WAN PWR Vyr M 1w STATE KGHWAY /CMPM ROAD Nµ WUAL. H01W - -- - OTHER PAVED ROW wO�Mf�tYM I� l C f� •' DISTRIOT BOUNDARY nAwuwu � lA1PR/ Q °'A° g BU`v mR1' Q81t11 PNWA HANAPEPE - ELE'ELE ELE'ELE ? ,MM1nnj��nlmm��lpI1!1lmmI�''mm��11,I�I IWYIDIWIDOI��I PwvAIR ersr KOLOA- D 3 6 PO,IPU- 3 1.5 KALAHEO SCALES 1- = 3 MILES armi HAHAPEPE Fig" 12-1 County of K&W Department of Water d Para Private Systems Water Sarvbs Area E County System E Private System Source: R.M.Towill (2015) A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE 3. Improve the quality of effluent discharged into CHANGES injection wells, especially those in the Special Management Areas. 1. Require large -scale developers to contribute funds toward improved recycled water 4. Support innovative treatment systems that production and distribution, or to construct their produce effluent at appropriate water quality own wastewater reclamation facility. levels to encourage reuse such as irrigation, 2. Manage wastewater treatment and disposal industrial uses, and other non - potable use. in a manner that safeguards human and environmental health, accommodates future growth, is efficient and cost effective, and uses recycled water from treatment where possible. 140 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN B. PLANS AND STUDIES Develop and update wastewater facility plans to guide decisions regarding the allocation of treatment capacity, the expansion of wastewater systems, and system improvement priorities. 2. Coordinate public and private planning, development, operation, and management of wastewater treatment and disposal systems. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS E 3 0 5 0 7 Expand existing wastewater treatment systems to existing communities where possible, with a focus on expanding the Wailua Wastewater Treatment Plant to the Wailua �H.ouse_Lofs area. Rouselof-s Provide adequate trunk sewer and collection main capacities to serve existing and future urban development. Plan for and implement regional wastewater treatment solutions for South Kaua'i and Kilauea. Monitor the disposition and potential effect of cesspool seepage and injection wells on the groundwater and nearshore water quality. Support water reuse projects and increase the use of recycled water. Explore opportunities to utilize the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program forfinancing water quality infrastructure projects, including energy savings at plants, capacity increases including new pump stations, and drainage improvements. Improve wastewater infrastructure through grant and loan programs, such as the USDA Rural Development Program. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Reduce the number of cesspools through septic conversion or through connection to a new or existing regional wastewater system. 2. Institute best practices for diverting and reusing wastewater. 3. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING With a landfill nearing capacity and a fragile island ecosystem, all people must do their part to recycle, reduce waste generation, and properly dispose of hazardous and green waste. The County should continue to explore and embrace programs and strategies that reduce our waste footprint. 3.1 Managing the Solid Waste Stream through Increased Diversion There are significant challenges to managing solid waste disposal on a small island with a growing residential and visitor population. The Department of Public Works (DPW) provides islandwide service for collecting and disposing of solid waste generated by residents. This includes a limited number of commercial customers, including Transient Vacation Rentals. The majority of businesses requiring dumpster service are collected by private refuse hauling companies. The DPW currently does not have curbside recycling or curbside green waste collection programs. All residential recycling is voluntary, and residents must transport material to various centers located throughout the island. In 2015, total islandwide waste generation was approximately 150,000 tons (roughly estimated at 11.6 pounds per person a day). An estimated 44 percent of total waste is diverted from the landfill through recycling and other diversion efforts. The diversion rate has increased steadily over the past ten years; however, it cannot be assumed the diversion rate will continue to climb. Reaching the County's goal of 70 percent diversion by 2023 will require a new materials recycling facility (MRF), curbside recycling, recycling mandates for businesses, and curbside collection of green waste. IV. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 141 L 3 The County offers a variety of residential recycling opportunities for various recyclables from appliances to household hazardous waste. Items are accepted free of charge at various locations throughout the island. The County also offers free backyard composting bins for residents to manage food and yard waste. These programs are coupled with strong education and outreach efforts. Disposal of commercially generated cardboard, metal, and green waste is restricted at the landfill. This has been very effective,in assuring that large generators do not dispose of recyclable items. The County is looking to reinforce this existing legislation by mandating that local businesses have recycling programs in place for materials that are easily recyclable. The Hawai'i Deposit Beverage Container (DBC) law was implemented in 2005 and covers water and other beverages packaged in aluminum, bi- metal, glass, and certain plastics. This provides an economic incentive to recycle and has significantly increased the diversion of these containers. The current recycling rate is 68 percent. Food waste is another opportunity to divert waste from landfills, especially since food waste emits high levels of greenhouse gas in landfills. The County's "Food: Too Good to Waste" public awareness campaign provides tools and tips for residents and businesses to save money by reducing food waste. The County will explore other remedies to solid waste disposal through new technologies and new methods. 3.2 Developing a New Landfill DPW manages the County's only landfill at Kekaha, where all municipal solid waste from residents and businesses is disposed. The landfill has a limited lifespan with lessthan 700,000 cubic yards of capacity remaining28. The estimated remaining lifespan of the landfill is approximately 4.9 years. This requires increasing waste diversion and capacity at the Kekaha Landfill, while expediting the development of a new landfill site. Decisive action is needed, as the required environmental studies, land acquisition, and program implementation for a new landfill site will be a lengthy process. In addition to increased recycling, a new landfill will be needed to address solid waste disposal. The current Kekaha landfill site is the only permitted 28 The Waste Management of Hawaii (WMH) Annual Report released in February 2015 municipal solid waste site on the island and can continue to accept waste only up through 2020 without approvals to expand it. If existing proposals to expand are approved, the Kekaha landfill will likely reach capacity by 2028. It is extremely important to note that estimates of remaining time before the Kekaha landfill is full are based on typical conditions for solid waste generation. These can change dramatically after a major storm or other natural disaster. For context, Hurricane'lniki in 1992 produced more solid waste in a 24 -hour period than five years of the typical rate of solid waste generation on Kaua'i. The County has proposed to create a combined new landfill and materials recycling facility on a 270 - acre site owned by the State in Ma'alo, near Uhu'e. The proposed Resource Recovery Park provides the possibility of more preferable locations for long- term management of some of KauaTs solid waste disposal and recycling programs that are not already operational. Long -term management of KauaTs solid waste streams will require diligent efforts bythe community, businesses, and government. Coordinated programs are needed to "reduce, reuse, and recycle" in ways that are effective and convenient. Programs that reduce waste from building materials, packaging, or other major waste generators can be particularly effective since they target larger volume businesses that can adjust their systems, often with cost savings as a byproduct. Targets, such as the County's 70 percent diversion rate goal by 2023, help focus efforts and bring attention to programs and strategies that work best. IV. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 143 A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES Reduce construction and demolition debris disposal in landfills by requiring recycling, particularly for large contractors and construction projects. B. PLANS AND STUDIES Update and implement the Solid Waste Integrated Management Plan to set policies for solid waste programs, facility planning, capital improvements, operations, user fees, and financing facilities and operations. 2. Plan and prepare for emergency debris management and disposal due to future major storms and tsunamis. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Site and construct a new landfill. 2. Establish an automated weekly, curbside collection system for residentially generated green waste and recyclables. 3. Reduce solid waste volume through source - reduction through newtechnology and programs that reuse building materials, minimize packing materials, and other measures. Focus attention on large volume purchasers and developers. 4. Divert at least 70 percent of solid waste from landfill sites to recycling and reuse by 2023. 5. Maximize effective life of existing and future landfill capacity. 6. Increase the convenience of recycling centers for users. 744 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 4. AIRPORTS AND HARBORS, Ocean and air travel are what keep Kaua'i connected to the world. We rely on our airports and harbors to bring people and essential goods to and from the island. Their reliability and longevity are critical to maintaining Kaua'i's economy. 4.1 Modernizing Airports to Serve Current and Future Needs Kaua'i's main airport in Uhu'e is managed bythe HDOT Airports Division. In addition, the HDOT operates the Port Allen airport, a general aviation airport. HDOT is undertaking a statewide Airports Modernization Program. In Uhu'e, improvements include upgrades to the ticket lobby, construction of a consolidated car rental facility, and an expansion of the parking area and airport loop road.29 The State of Hawai'i Office of Q) Planning recently completed a Technical Assistance Memorandum (TAM) to guide planning of land uses within five miles of airports to assure land uses that are compatible with airport operations, including aircraft landing and takeoff.30 While improvements to airports are justified to serve existing and projected demand, there is concern that increasing the capacity of L-ihu'e Airport would support and encourage increased visitor traffic. Such improvements should be balanced with the objectives of managing tourism impacts and keeping visitor arrivals at reasonable levels. 4.2 Accommodating Demand for Commercial Harbor Facilities KauaTs two commercial harbors at Nawiliwili Harbor and Port Allen are also owned and operated by the State through the HDOT's Harbors Division. Nawiliwili Harbor serves as the primary commercial harbor for Kaua'i with facilities for handling both overseas 29 Hawaii Airports Modernization Program, 2008 30 TAM - 2016 -1, August 1, 2016 and inter - island general and containerized cargo. The harbor is also used for charter boat fishing and recreational boating and is a port-of -call for passenger cruise ships. Port Allen is a popular port for excursion and charter boat operations but is not currently equipped to accommodate cruise ships. The Kauai Commercial Harbors 2025 Master Plan (CHMP) was updated in 2001 and contains recommendations for both harbors through the year 2025. Kaua'i depends almost entirely on ocean transportfor its essential commodities, including food, clothing, fuel, automobiles, and many other goods. Ocean freight is also used to export goods within and outside the State. The CHMP emphasized the need to ensure commercial harbors can accommodate projections of cargo volumes through the year 2025, which were used to developfacility recommendations. Nawiliwili Harbor should be able to accommodate demand for overseas and inter - island shipments through 2025, but beyond that, expansion may be needed. A State -owned area adjacent to the existing terminal was identified for possible expansion of the overseas terminal in the CHMP. Inter - island terminal needs may also be met by harbor reconfiguration or additional land acquisition. 4.3 Valuing Small Boat Harbors as Important Recreational Resources Small boat harbors are a valued recreational amenity on Kaua'i.They are managed bythe State Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Division of Boating and Recreation ( DOBOR). There may be opportunities for the County to support DOBOR in applying for grants and funding, providing parking, and seeking expedited permitting for maintenance of small boat harbors. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES At airports, accommodate shuttles that transport visitors to resort destinations. 2. Do not expand the Princeville Airport, except for use as a parking hub and gateway for visitors to the North Shore. B. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS Support DOBOR with master planning and acquiring funding forexpansion and maintenance of all small boat harbors. 2. Update the Lihu'e Airport Master Plan and address capacity issues. 3. Collaborate with HDOT Airports Division in the implementation of the TAM. —fl Re-Move, a mp4,1 liwo. 4. Collaborate with HDOT Airports Division and other agencies in future planning of land uses at Burns Field in Port Allen as a part of the Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele Community Plan. IV. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 145 '1 R Aw- Hanalei Pier at Black Pot Beach, North Shore District S ECTO R Vo SHARED SPACES The public realm belongs to all and must be planned and designed in consideration of all users' needs from keiki to kupuna. Shared spaces, also known as "civic spa a ",are the �,�� areas used for everyday community activities such as shopping, recreation, an socializing. Kaua'i's most important shared spaces are its town centers, streets, beaches, and parks. Policies and actions for shared spaces are aimed at making town centers, parks, paths, and other common areas more inviting, safe, functional, and vibrant. They should be places where people can relax, interact, and enjoy the things that make Kaua'i special. Shared spaces also provide a connection to place. When the community is involved in the design and activation of shared spaces, they become points of pride and hallmarks of uniqueness. 146 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN From bus stops, public art, park design, and landscaping, there are a multitude of ways that KauaTs communities can put their imprint on shared spaces. This section includes actions forTown Centers, County Parks, Linear Parks and Trails, Passive Parks, and State Pa rks. 1. TOWN CENTERS KauaTs small towns are the pride of the island, with historic charm and unique character. Town centers are hubs for activity, commerce, and interaction. In spite of the technological progress made in the digital and automobile age, some of our town centers have declined and independent businesses have closed. Presently, we have the opportunity to revitalize these town centers by encouraging a mix of businesses and housing, along with attractive design and safe sidewalks. 1.1 Helping Town Centers be Vibrant Shared Spaces KauaTs town centers are the primary milieus for daily civic, business, and commercial activities. Both existing andfuturetown centers are designated "Neighborhood Center" on the Future Land Use Map. In Uhu'e, some town center areas are designated "Urban Cent6 Residents place a high value on their historic towns and efforts to revitalize business :%r and generate economic activity are ongoing in Waimea, Hanapepe, K61oa, Lihu'e, and Kapa'a. The General Plan supports focused development within towns, also known as infill development. More intense and efficient use of existing urban space will protect open space and rural character. Infill development requires improvements to the infrastructure capacity and physical environment of town centers. This means that in addition to being compact and walkable, town centers must have environmentally and aesthetically attractive features such as street trees, green spaces, convenient and safe pedestrian access, and appealing building facades or public art. At the same time, redevelopment must be balanced with protection of a town's historic character. The preservation of historic plantation architecture creates sense of place, allowing residents and visitors to feel connected to the town's past. 1.2 Supporting Public Art Public art is art that is placed and integrated into the public realm for everyone to enjoy. It includes a variety of forms such as murals, sculptures, and statues. Art can also be reflected in the design of bus shelters, park facilities, and crosswalks. Public art enhances sense of place and can educate people about KauaTs history and heritage. Some examples of public art includes the whale mural by Wyland in Waipouli and the installation at the roundabout at Umi and Hardy Streets. Since 1967, the State has had an "Art in State Buildings" law where one percent of the construction costs of new public buildings is designated for art work. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Encourage vibrant shared space and destinations in town centers by: a. Implementing design standards to ensure the aesthetic character of buildings blends in and matches the desired scale and character of the town. Commercial buildings in Kapa'a Town Center, East Kaua'i District V. SHARED SPACES 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 147 b. Allowing historic buildings on small lots to redevelop without the imposition of new setbacks or off- street parking requirements. c. Siting new commercial development contiguous to towns, within walking distance of residential development. d. Supporting the creation of and improvement of venues for art and culture. e. Providing comfortable and safe walking environments, including context - sensitive sidewalks along main roads. f. Enhancing shade resources, including trees on streets and in public parks, and improving criteria for species selection and programs for tree maintenance. g. Providing more on- street parking. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Acknowledge the important role of town squares and other civic space in town centers and seek to improve usability of such venues. 2. Establish or update urban design standards through Community Plans. 3. Identify public art opportunities and funding in community and facility planning. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Implement economic revitalization projects in town centers, such asthe Lihu'eTown Core TIGER grant project. 2. Construct centralized parking lots in towns that experience parking management issues. 3. Improve criteria for species selection and maintenance of street trees and landscaping. 4. Identify opportunities for public art installation in projects, such as roundabouts, parks, and streetscape improvements. 148 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Foster civic engagement in town centers through placemaking activities. 2. Conduct community events that bring people together. 3. Activate and revitalize public spaces with artwork, programs, and performances. 4. Use underutilized public space as venues for creative expression. s 10 2. PARKS £ Our County park system is an invaluable Zr public asset - essential to both Kaua'i's W economy and sense of community. Parks o should provide abundant opportunities for residents and visitors to experience the island's renowned beaches and coastline, and also strengthen community fabric COW44ines through shared space and amenities for play, exercise, socializing, and enjoying nature. 2.1 Maintaining Our Existing Park System KauaTs park system comprises 85 properties varying in size and use, from beach parks to neighborhood centers. Special parks includethe 18 -hole publicWailua g'olf c6urse, and cultural preserves at Ka Ulu o Paoa, Ka Ulu o Laka, and Kaneiolouma. County parks are managed by the Department of Parks and Recreation, which was created by Charter in 2006. Recently, the Department began systemic facility upgrades, ADA accessibility improvements, and launched a cultural E stewardship agreement to restore Kaneiolouma. Since ✓ 2000, the park system expanded to include Ke Ala Hele Makalae - the East Kaua'i Shared Use Path - and Black ✓v Pot Park expansion. The location of parks is shown on the Public Facilities and Land Use Maps in Chapter 5. The range of parks include: • Regional Parks (serve entire County and have specialized recreation facilities); • District Parks (serve several neighborhoods with structured recreation activities); • Beach Parks (support wide range of marine recreation activities); . • Neighborhood Parks (playground and open space for surrounding local community)` . • Special Use Areas (golf courses and other unique facilities); . • Passive Parks; ands, • Linear Parks (addressed in Linear Park subsection). Given the extensive use of KauaTs parks by residents and visitors, park maintenance is a visible and important governmental function. Park management is challenging when dealing with a large number of properties spread around a jurisdiction and with limited financial resources and personnel. A survey conducted as part of the County's Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2013) found that improving the maintenance of existing parks ranked as the most important issue. Overall, County parks are heavily used and require more maintenance and upgrades than they currently receive. While the regional and district parks attract the greatest numbers of users and are easier to maintain from a resource allocation perspective, the County should maintain all of its parks to serve the diversity of users on the island. Budgeting the available resources proves to be an ongoing challenge and illustrates the need to diversify sources of financial and in -kind support. Currently, thekOpen Space Fund. 0.5 receives.1.5 percent of real propertytaxes and can be used to acquire park land.31 Other sources of funding, including facility use fees and State and Federal grant programs for land acquisition, are utilized for facility planning, rehabilitation and construction, and trail restoration. Additional support is possible through partnerships with the private sector and community through efforts like Adopt -a -Park programs, recreation partnerships, and volunteer clean -up and improvement programs. I PulolfG Access, D pev% Space,, NacluyaI Resoutirce—s Pre$eY- vc.L+iol,, FLAhCJ (co Vmm o v► ty IKVI o w h as +k*, Opevx Soxc4 FLlnd) 31 County bf Kaua'i Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2013 2.2 Supporting Communities through a Range of Parks Most parks provide landscaped refuges with space for keiki to play or for adults to sit and enjoy the outdoors. However, substantial park acreage is underutilized and could supporta varietyof parktypes and recreational uses. An active neighborhood park strengthens and connects communities by providing civic space. This type of shared space supports infill development and new growth. Although Kaua'i has many neighborhood and passive parks, most do not provide the full range of facilities desired by residents. A range of park sizes and types in proximity to neighborhoods supports healthy activities and builds community cohesion. Park land can be used for broad or specialized uses, from community gardens, dog parks, skate parks, and larger multi -use park complexes. The usability of neighborhood parks can be improved by adding playgrounds, walking paths, seating, and pavilions. Facilities for children and the aging population must be considered in park design. Community Plans can identify areas appropriate for park uses in each district. A Civic Space designation with associated standards can be applied to areas intended for parks. Park creation and improvement is an ideal area to explore public and private partnerships. Creative funding sources and maintenance solutions can be identified with the help of community partners. amala Bridge Playground at Lydgate Park, Lihu'e District BynUY1r1 V. SHARED SPACES 12 .0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 149 V� Community involvement allows parks to be better tailored to the unique needs and entity of each neighborhood. iJein4i+ies 2.3 Improving Park Accessibility for Greater Equity Park accessibility is important from an equity perspective. Parks and their facilities should be safe and accessible for people of all ages and abilities. ADA requirements ensure a certain level of accessibility is provided, but there are other aspects as well, such as having sufficient parking, or just the simple distance of parks from residential areas with significant numbers of seniors and /or children. Access for seniors is particularly important as the park system must accommodate an aging population. Priority should also be given to communities across the island with a high degree of low- income households, children, and kupuna. 2.4 Facing the Challenges of Beach Park Management Beach parks are among Kaua'i's most treasured scenic and recreational assets. They accommodate a range of uses by visitors and residents alike, both in and out of the water. Sadly, there are those who take advantage of common areas through vandalizing, littering, illegal camping, and crime. Security and maintenance of KauaTs beach parks are ongoing concerns. Many of the facilities, such as restrooms and picnic areas at the most heavily frequented beach parks, are in need of more maintenance, upgrades, and repairs. The most popular beach parks in South Kaua'i, East Kaua'i, and the North Shore are getting more crowded, and public uses occasionally conflict. It is difficult for residents to enjoy traditional recreational beach activities in an overcrowded setting. In order to preserve the local lifestyle, many residents desire for some areas to be reserved primarily for local use and not heavily promoted to visitors. Furthermore, visitor safety in these areas, which often lack water safety officers, is another valid concern. Access and parking at beach parks can limit the enjoyment of residents and visitors. Many parking areas are too small to accommodate demand. In some cases, development near popular beaches provides little to no public parking, forcing people to find street parking along the highway or in residential areas. Shoreline erosion and sea level rise are discussed in other areas of the General Plan; however, it is worth 750 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN noting that KauaTs beach parks are profoundly affected by ongoing beach loss. It is important to preserve and treat well the areas that we have remaining, and ensure they can be enjoyed by all. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Provide comprehensive, well- designed, and highly functional parks and recreational facilities that meet public needs, provide attractive places to exercise, accommodate diverse groups and activities, make suitable use of resources, and are compatible with surrounding uses. 2. Provide a range of civic space and functional parks in large residential projects and in new communities. 3. Streamline permitting of public facilities to efficiently coordinate the development and expansion of parks. 4. Allow in -lieu funding expenditure on facility capital improvements through the Park Dedication Ordinance. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Plan for safe routes to parks, especially in areas with high concentration of youth. 2. Utilize vacant or underused County -owned land for community purposes. : i +gliciZe. 3. Update and implement the Kauai Parks Master +� Plan. V add : (.zo13) add : & Rtcvtdiion C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Support priority projects in the Kaua'i Parks ✓ Master Plan. ddd •. & Recv-ea+ov, 2. Prioritize park improvements and provide safe routes to parks, especially in low- income neighborhoods with high concentrations of youth. 3. Implement a playground development and rehabilitation program to provide high quality play environments, especially in underserved communities. 4. Enhance parks by making them more conducive to physical activity through shared use paths, play equipment for more than one age group, skate parks, disc golf, tennis facilities, and other improvements. 5. Promote social interaction through facility improvements, such as pavilions, shade trees, and seating. 6. Expand indoor recreation spaces at selected parks. 7. Develop prototype designs for new facilities such as restrooms and pavilions in order to shorten design and implementation times, and standardize repair and maintenance. 8. Ensure safety and cleanliness at KauaTs beach parks. Use Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) when planning improvements. 9. Address illegal camping in parks. 10. Provide accessibility features at popular facilities such as beach parks. 11. Develop and install uniform signage, including interpretive signage that promotes a sense of place and educates the public at County beach parks regarding sensitive coastal and marine ecosystems and wildlife. 12. Provide canopy trees and shading at regional parks, such as over unshaded bleachers, to guard against heatstroke and other heat hazards, especially during football, baseball, and soccer seasons. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Expand the County's park stewardship agreement program. 2. Explore alternative sources of funding for priority park improvements, such as crowdfunding and community initiatives or collaborations. 3. Implement programs for beach and dune restoration, especially at beach parks experiencing erosion such as Po'ipu Beach Park. 3. LINEAR PARKS AND TRAILS Pedestrian and biking paths and trails are special public recreational assets. They offer a scenic and safe refuge from traffic and development, allowing residents and visitors to experience Kaua'i's natural environment. Trails are identified in the Heritage Resource Maps in Chapter S. 3.1 Extending Kaua'i's Shared Use Path Network Shared use paths, often located within a linear park, are separated from roads and provide a safe environment for pedestrians and cyclists of all ages. Benefits of shared use paths include lessening dependence on fossil fuels, improving community health, increasing public access, and providing economic development opportunities. Since the last General Plan, the County has constructed over eight miles of shared use path along the Kapa'a- Wailua Coast, also known as Ka Ala Hele Makalae. In addition to allowing residents and visitors to enjoy an uninterrupted traverse of the coastline or open space, shared use paths increase travel choice by providing important non - vehicular connections between towns or nodes of activity. Based on the success of Ka Ala Hele Makalae, other paths have been planned for the North Shore, South Kaua'i, and Waimea - Kekaha. 3.2 Increasing Recreational Opportunities through Trails --c KauaTs people have a long tradition of using trails lu for subsistence activities in the mountains and along £ the coast. Today, trails are an invaluable resource providing access not only to recreation, but to y experience cultural history, hunting game animals, managing natural resources, and suppressing wildfires. The majority of KauaTs public and signed trails are maintained through the State - either State Parks or the Na Ala Hele Program. The Na Ala Hele V. SHARED SPACES 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR IS1 Table 3 -2 State Parks on Kaua'i Park Name Planning District Master Plan Status KOke'e State Park Waimea - Kekaha Approved in 2013. Polihale State Park Waimea - Kekaha Master plan not updated. Waimea Canyon State Park Waimea- Kekaha Approved in 2013. Waimea State Recreational Pier Waimea - Kekaha Master plan not updated. Russian Fort Elizabeth Historical State Park ihu'e' Kaiwxa- Kekaha Master plan not updated. Ahukini State Recreational Pier Uhu'e /East Kaua'i Master plan not updated. Wailua River State Park East Kaua'i Master plan not updated. Haena State Park North Shore Draft plan released in 2015. Na Pali Coast State Park North Shore /Waimea- Kekaha Master plan not updated. for visitors and residents seeking to visit the many attractions nearby. An unmanaged parking situation has contributed to high rates of theft and vandalism at the parking lot. State Parks has completed or is in the process of developing master plans for major parks, such as Ha'ena, Waimea, and Koke'e. In order to implement solutions and improve park facilities per the master plans, funds will have to be provided. Remove space, A. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Implement the Waimea Canyon, Koke'e, and Ha'ena State Park Master Plans. 2. Complete master planning for Russian Fort, Polihale, and Wailua River State Parks. 3. Support adequate funding and staffing for capital improvements, including maintenance and enforcement for public parks, trails, and recreation areas. 4. Improve and coordinate infrastructure and transportation to reduce visitor impacts. Hiking trail in Koke'e State Park, Waimea - Kekaha District V. SHARED SPACES 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 153 Is r %. Hanapepe Art Night, Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele District SECTOR- Vie ECONOMY Kaua'i strives to be a place where the economy is resilient, small businesses thrive, and all people have opportunities to access the education and training that lead to gainful employment. We must collaborate and find creative ways to leverage our assets so existing and new industries can grow. 3 Increasing Economic Opportunity leading industry.- KauaTs other anchor industries for All include healthcare (11 percent), education (� � percent), construction (6 percent), and government Over the long term, average annual job growth is (6 percent). projected at 1.12 percent, equating to 34,900 civilian Despite the projected job growth, economic wage and salary jobs by 2035. The number of self- opportunity on Kaua'i is offset by the high cost employed persons is also projected to increase at of living. The average family of four must earn ten a rate higher than the rest of the State. In terms of percent more than the rest of the State, and more industrial growth, tourism comprises 30 percent than 160 percent of the State minimum wage to meet of all employment and will likely remain KauaTs 33 Kaua'i Economic Summary Report, Collaborative Economics 2015 154 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN their basic need S.34 On top of this, KauaTs median household income is typically far less than the State average .31 As a result, many residents work multiple jobs, supplement income with home grown food or cottage businesses, and commute long distances to work from the neighborhoods that have affordable housing. Supporting Regional and Community Based Economic Development Growing economic opportunity requires cooperation and collaboration. The Chamber of Commerce, Kaua'i Economic Development Board (KEDB), and other associations lead initiatives and often partner with the County's Office of Economic Development. Kaua'i Community College plays an essential role in developing education and workforce training opportunities. The County relies onthesepartnerships in its efforts to attract new industries and stimulate existing businesses. The Kaua'i Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy, or CEDS, engages the County and stakeholders to craft strategies for economic growth over the short term. Strategy updates occur every five years and in concert with the development of a regional statewide CEDS. Cultivating Economic Diversification and Resiliency KauaTs visitor industry provides livelihoods to many, butthe heavy reliance on tourism is a major concern. Disruptions in global and national tourism are out of our control, yet they have large repercussions on Kaua'i. For KauaTs economy to be more resilient and less dependent on a single industry, there will need to be a diversity of living -wage jobs in different sectors. These jobs must be supported by a skilled and educated workforce. The 2016 -2021 CEDS seeks to foster a diversified economy. The six target industry clusters identified as promising areas for growth are:> • Food end Agriculture • Sustainable Technologies & Practices • Science & Technology • Health & Wellness 34 Self - Sufficiency Standard: Estimates for Hawai'i 2014, DBEDT 2015 35 State of Hawai'i Databook 2014, DBEDT 2015 • Sports & Recreation • Arts & Culture In 2014, these sectors comprised approximately 30 percent of KauaTs private sector jobs, almost as large a share as tourism. The actions identified in the CEDS are aimed at providing infrastructure, capital, and workforce to support the growth of these sectors. Additionally, to realize the goal of becoming more resilient, businesses must be prepared and protected so they can recover from natural disasters and adapt to impacts from climate change. O kau aku, o ka is la mai, pela ka nohona o ka 'ohana From you and from him, so lived the family. The farmer gave to the fisherman, the fisherman gave to the farmer. Providing the Physical Capacity for Economic Growth For economic growth to occur, an adequate amount of space must be available for KauaTs business needs including commercial, industrial, resort, and agricultural uses. Other important strategies include redeveloping ourtown centers as attractive placesto work and promoting mixed use and adaptive reuse to more efficiently use non - residential urban space. Workforce housing must also be provided near major jobs centers, such as resort areas and L-ihu'e. These needs and strategies are cross - cutting in nature and are included in the Shared Spaces and Housing Sectors. The following strategies are reflected in the Future Land Use Map and summarized below: Strengthening Existing Town Centers and Mixed Use Environments Directing growth and infrastrcture investment within or adjacent to town centers will generate economic activity for small businesses. Through a directed growth policy, our town centers can support a mix of housing, commerce, and recreational uses that appeals to our millennial and baby boomer population. Mixed use zoning will better accommodate KauaTs self - employed and cottage businesses. VI. ECONOMY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 155 f ✓✓ Relevant Land Use Map Changes: • Application of Neighborhood Center and Neighborhood General around existing town cores (Kekaha, Waimea, Hanap6p6- 'Ele'ele, Port Allen, LThu'e, Kapa'a, Kapahi, Anahola, Y Kilauea, Hanalei) • Application of Special Planning Areas in Uhu'e and South Kaua'i (K61oa, Kal3heo, Kukuiula roundabout area) to encourage infill housing and mixed use within existing town cores Providing Adequate Space for Industrial Uses and Manufacturing In order to accommodate industrial and manufacturing needs, the supply of existing industrial zoned land must be carefully considered. There is a deficit of industrial lands outside of the Lihu'e Planning District, and many small businesses such as welding shops, auto repair, and woodshops are left to operate in residential areas via a use permit or illegally. The potential of former plantation mill sites for redevelopment or adaptive reuse must also be tapped. Relevant Land Use Map Changes: • Industrial Designation at K61oa Mill, Port Allen, Olokele Mill, and Anahola Revitalizing Existing Visitor Destination Areas Over the last two decades, a substantial number of jobs have been generated within the visitor industry (arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodations, and food services). However, visitor growth also strains public facilities, infrastructure, and public services. Therefore, new resort growth and infrastructure should be focused in the VDA. Relevant Land Use Map Changes: • No resort designation expansion Protecting Agricultural Lands for Agricultural Production and Food Self- Sufficiency The County and State can protect the capacity for agricultural production through the designation of Important Agricultural Lands, density controls, and changes to development standards. Relevant Land Use Map Changes: • IAL designations • Urban Edge Boundary in the Uhu'e Planning District 756 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Fostering a University District Access to quality education and training is needed to expand KauaTs workforce and to facilitate growth in the emerging industries. The University Zone designation reflects the community's desire to recognize Kaua'i Community College and the surrounding area as an education center with supportive residential and commercial mixed uses. Relevant Land Use Map Changes: • University Zone designation in the Lihu'e Planning Area The following sections discuss objectives and actions for Tourism, Agriculture, and Small Businesses and Promising Economic Sectors. Kaua'i Economic Development Goals 2016 -2020 (CEDS 2016) 1. Build, attract, and retain a 21st century workforce. 2. Encourage innovation and the development of small, mid -size, and large businesses and organizations. 3. Increase adaptability and resilience, particularly regarding natural disasters and climate change. 4. Increase collaboration. 5. Ensure sustainable development. 6. Achieve greater food self - sufficiency. 7. Develop plans and continueto build capacity for economic development in each of the six target industry clusters. 8. Enhance the community's ability to th rive. 1. TOURISM The visitor industry is the mainstay of Kaua'i's economy. It accounts for a third of the County's total economic output and generates more than a quarter of the jobs. It contributes substantially to County tax revenue. The policy of the General Plan is to uphold Kaua'i as a unique visitor destination by focusing on revitalization and limiting new resort designations. 1.1 Understanding Kaua'i's Carrying Capacity for Tourism Every year, over 1.1 million visitors are drawn to KauaTs beautiful environment and rich array of cultural and outdoor activities. Research shows that most visitors are attracted to the island's peaceful and unhurried setting. These preferences align well with residents' desire to preserve KauaTs natural beauty and small town character. Table 3 -3 2016 Average Daily Visitor Census by Month Month Average Daily Census January 27,603 February 24,744 March 24,772 April 22,495 May 22,140 June 29,104 July 29,258 August 24,082 September 20,979 October 22,244 November 22,055 December 28,055 Average 24,797 Source: Hawai'i Tourism Authority, 2017 Acknowledgement of a tourism carrying capacity is occurring at the State level as well; the State of Hawai'i Climate Adaptation Initiative (Act 183) calls As much as visitors support KauaTs economy, they for analysis of a maximum annual visitor carrying also stress infrastructure and increase the demand capacity for the State and Counties. for public services. As shown in Table 3 -3, in 2016 1.2 Managing Visitor Unit Inventory Kaua'i had an average daily visitor census (ADVC) Expansion of 24,797 visitors, enough to increase KauaTs population by more than a third. ADVC is variable Resort and hotel properties account for 20 percent due to many factors including economic conditions, of the total revenue from Real Property, and vacation natural disasters, political conficts, and others. On rentals account for an additional 21 percent. 31 Over Kauai, ADVC has been slowly growing at an average 40 percent of the County's Real Property tax revenue rate of about 2% per year since 2000, with a slight 03 comes from visitor accommodations. dip due to the economic recession of 2008 -2009 Today's visitor, plant inventory is a mix of hotel units, (Figure 3 -9). tZ timeshares,: B &B's, vacation rental units and condo Many feel Kaua'i has hit its "carrying capacity" with hotels (See Figure 3 -10). The majority of KauaTs regard to certain infrastructure systems, particularly visitor accommodation falls in the deluxe to luxury the most heavily utilized parks and road networks. price range. Less than three percent of KauaTs The traffic congestion along the highway in Wailua- @ccommodation is considered budget (campsites Kapa'a is an oft -cited example. Popular destinations are not!considered to be units). such as HWena State Park are actively looking for The number of total visitor units on Kaua'i dipped ways to address over - crowding and other impacts. 36 gC�omrnoc�0.�ioNS -Fctll County of Kauai Real Property Data, 2016 VI. ECONOMY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 757 6tCG4C>YY% " o ci a.+i OVI S C C, Tv Rs TV Us d / following the passage of three ordinances (864, There is a need to manage tourism growth and 876, and 904) that increased regulation on transient the associated impacts through legally available vacation rentals or units (NR's or�/U's) outside of means, including regulating resort uses outside the designated Visitor Destination Areas (VDA). The VDA and imposing entitlement deadlines on resort ordinances established a non - conforming use u> designations. The resulting policy isto limitexpansion grandfathering process for the operation of TVR's: 0 ofLDA's beyond what is recognized as Resort in the outside of the VDA. Under the current Iaw,TVR's, are ) Future Land Use Map. Figure 3 -11 shows existing not allowed outside of the VDA unless they have an VDA's on Kaua'i. Resort designations are described active Non - Conforming Use Certificate. in Chapter 2, and Land Use Maps in Chapter 5. KauaTs visitor inventory could expand by 3,000 units, considering the amount of "pipeline" projects that have received their final discretionary permit. Given that each unit supports an average of two or three visitors, construction of these units would expand ADVC by several thousand. Although the County's projections do not foresee a drastic expansion of the visitor population over the long term, many are concerned about the impact of such an increase on KauaTs already burdened infrastructure. Possibly compounding the potential problem are hundreds of acres of resort- designated land without entitlements, which have the potential to further expand the inventory. There was strong support to eliminate this potential in order to first absorb and manage impact from existing "pipeline" projects. 1.3 Improving the Visitor Experience and Impacts on Communities 4 Improving the visitor experience and reducing a impacts will depend on adopting new ways of doing things. Taking shuttles to popular destinations N instead of driving private cars is one example. 0) Fortunately, Kaua'i has a high percentage of repeat :5 visitors., as much as 70 percent, according to the W KTSP. Learning about and accepting different ways a of accessing KauaTs attractions should be easier for experienced visitors, who might also appreciate such efforts to preserve the environment and culture. Managing visitor impacts also includes improving visitor facilities and parking at both County and State parks, and ocean safety at beaches. Given that impacts disproportionally affect certain areas of the Visitors enjoying the blue waters of Ke'e Beach, North Shore District 158 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN s Q3 ri 0 14 A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1 2 3 4 Revitalize( - -rather than expand(7*.the resort areas in Po'ipu, Uhu'e, Wailua, and Princeville. Focus visitor uses, services, facilities, and accommodation in the Visitor Destination Area. Do not expand existing Visitor Destination Area boundaries beyond resort- designated areas. Allow existing resort entitlements to build out and require any non - entitled resort- designated areas in this General Plan to attain full State and County zoning resort- related approvals by the year 2027, or within ten years of Community Plan approval if an area is conditionally designated. 5. Require short- duration expiration dates should development not be constructed as permitted. 6. Where appropriate, negotiate with entitled resort projects to reduce unit count if discretionary permits are sought again. 7. Do not allow spot amendments shish expand already- designated resort areas. -4)OA B. PLANS AND STUDIES Implement and update the Kaua'i Tourism Strategic Plan. 2. Explore development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Q ti 1. Improve route and destination signage to alleviate congestion associated with difficulties 4 in finding desired locations. 2. Improve waste disposal, collection, and management at popular destinations and Qprovide more recycling options. 3. Support -projects -- -to,. encourage visitor transportation mode shift from single occupancy vehicles to other modes. 160 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Provide visitors with a unique, positive, culturally - rich, and safe experience on Kaua'i. Encourage cultural sensitivity and cultural exchange. 2. Develop alternative transportation options for visitors, including shuttles and car sharing, to reduce visitor impact on our roads, highways, and scenic places. 3. Establish a County tax on rental cars to fund alternative transportation options for visitors. 4. Lift the capon existing Transient Accommodation Tax (TAT) funds distributed by the State to Counties, thus increasing the allocation to Kaua'i for services and infrastructure. 5. Develop and promote community programs that reinforce the unique sense of place of communities, such as those with historical and cultural significance. 6. Encourage more use of Native Hawaiian place names and increase understanding of the meanings. 7. Promote sustainable tourism and educate visitors on the vulnerability of KauaTs environment. 8. Attract new employees, especially local residents, to the visitor industry to ensure an available, well - qualified workforce. 9. Train the visitor workforce in understanding KauaTs local culture. 10. Encourage the visitor industry, airlines, and the growing cruise line industry, to buy and promote Kaua'i products and support businesses on Kauai. 11. Increase use of renewable fuel sources and support carbon offset programs and incentives for passengers traveling to and from Kaua'i. J Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Visitor Destination Areas Figure 3 -11 Kaua'i Visitor Destination Areas VI. ECONOMY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 161 22� 'a �k Bypass Kapa Rd /O-Rd v North Shore °amo Eas C5 , O LL U Kaumuali= i- Hwy�R`e Waimea �• v r Hangpepe- 'Ele'ele Lihu'e l 4 South Kaua'i 3 �- V6 r r r Ma`alo Kolo Rd 3 t �Z' K°\Oa_ y K? NORTH 1 in = 5 miles Miles! 0 2.75 5.5 11 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Visitor Destination Areas Figure 3 -11 Kaua'i Visitor Destination Areas VI. ECONOMY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 161 2. AGRICULTURE;- Agriculture is an important element in Kaua'i's identity as a rural place, and it represents our greatest opportunity for economic diversification and food aself - sufficiency. We can increase the 0 productivity and profitability of all forms of agriculture by nurturing small -scale u farms, promoting crop diversity, and strengthening partnerships. For this to occur, major challenges will have to be ti surmounted,-- from the upkeep of aging agricultural infrastructure to halting the tide of residential sprawl. 2.1 Perpetuating Kaua'i's Long Tradition of Agriculture Agriculture is the history and lifeline of the Hawaiian Islands. Malama 'aina, caring for the land, is ingrained in the fabric and language of the Native Hawaiian culture. Maka'ainana means "the common people" and is translated as "those who watch that which feeds" ( "that which feeds" being the land). To be occupied with the growing of food and materials for one's 'ohana is to be occupied with ensuring the health of the land, water, and natural systems. In pre- contact times, a variety of lo'i terraces, dry-land agriculture, fish ponds, and salt pans supported a large population. Some of KauaTs modern agricultural infrastructure is inherited from the ancient Hawaiians, such as taro fields and ditch systems. Traditional agricultural products such as taro, coconut, and breadfruit are still in demand and are synonymous with both healthy living and regional identity. In 1835, the Old K61oa Sugar Mill became HawaiTs first commercially - viable sugar mill. This heralded the era of plantation agriculture where sugar and pineapple cultivation dominated the landscape. 162 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Land was managed and owned by large companies such as the Koloa Sugar Company, McBryde Sugar Company, and Grove Farm. Supporting the sugar and pineapple industry was an extensive network of ditches, flumes, and reservoirs created and maintained by the landowners. The era of plantation agriculture has come to an end, but the remaining infrastructure and still - undeveloped swaths of agricultural land provide for today's agricultural activity and opportunities for new enterprise to thrive. Agriculture and food industries remain one of the most promising economic sectors on Kaua'i. It is a substantial source of employment, with about 3,601 jobs on Kaua'i in 2014. It is also a sectorthat supports KauaTs vision of remaining a rural island, preserving open spaces, and producing more food and resources. While the number of jobs in agriculture has not increased substantially since 2001, earnings have increased by 53 percent to $30,511 average annual earnings per employee.37Total earnings in the sector are upwards of $113 million per year. KauaTs agricultural lands are owned and managed by a small number of large landowners. On the South and West Sides, agricultural land owners include the State, the State Department of Hawaiian Homelands (DHHL), Alexander & Baldwin (A &B), and Grove Farm .38 There are pockets of agricultural land in Lihu'e District, mostly owned by Grove Farm. East KauaTs agricultural lands were largely sold off and converted to large lot residential development following the closure of Amfac HawaiTs Lihu'e Plantation; however, there remain some tracts between Hanama'ulu and Anahola that provide opportunities for cultivation. The North Shore is home to a large portion of KauaTs diversified agriculture operations, particularly around Moloa'a and Kilauea. Taro production is concentrated in and around Hanalei. The North Shore's land ownership patterns are more fragmented and among the most desirable areas for high -end housing. This, coupled with regulations that permit agricultural condominiums, exerts development pressure on the North Shore's agricultural lands. The Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline Study (2015) provides a snapshot of what is currently grown and raised on Kaua'i (Figure 3 -12). Like the 37 Draft Kauai Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Update, 2016 38 Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline Study, 2015 rest of the Hawaiian Islands, Kaua'i has shifted out of sugar cultivation within the last few decades, leaving much of its agricultural lands open to other uses. Over 40,000 acres are currently used as pasture for grazing animals, supported by three privately owned slaughtering facilities. The greatest share of KauaTs 21,000 acres of cultivated crop lands are in commercial seed production (13,299 acres),followed by coffee (3,788 acres), and commercial forestry (1,743 acres). The island has more taro cultivation than the rest of the state combined, with 443 acres under cultivation. The seed production industry has a much larger presence on Kaua'i than on any other island, with nearly twice the amount of acreage as O'ahu. Concerns about pesticide use and the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) by seed Zcompanies and other large agricultural producers have resulted in fact - finding inquiries, lawsuits, and 0 proposed legislation regulating these activities. ,3, Nevertheless, these large agricultural operations S provide substantial employment opportunities in rural areas of Kaua'i, particularly Waimea and Kekaha. \Z_'I This concern has carried throughout the community engagement process leadinguptothecraftingofthis - plan. The online survey response included a number `t of written comments seeking a higher degree of Zregulatory oversight concerning GMO and pesticide _ activities. However, given thejudgmentof the Federal Court striking down Bill 249.1, County ordinance on State statutory preemption grounds, no regulatory proposals are included in this plan. Should State laws be enacted to provide larger County authority for potential regulation of such agricultural activities, the General Plan could consider appropriate policies. 2.2 Protecting Important Agricultural Lands (IAL) The Agricultural District is under both State and County land use authority. The State Constitution sets the policy to "conserve and protect agricultural lands, promote diversified agriculture, increase agricultural self - sufficiency, and assurethe availability of agriculturally suitable lands ".9 Retaining the S. integrity of agricultural lands means protection against encroachment and fragmentation. Pursuant to the constitutional mandate, the State Legislature adopted Important Agricultural Lands (IAL) designation criteria in 2005. Once designated, 39 Important Agricultural Lands Study, 2015 IAL cannot be reclassified to State Land Use Urban District except under a "super majority" vote of both houses of the State legislature. Owners of these lands qualify for both State and County incentives, but those incentives have not been determined. The County's IALStudy mapped potential candidate lands and set a goal for the County to lead designation of at least 21,158 acres.40 Some major landowners have voluntarily designated their lands, a total of 16,263 acre S.41 County regulations limit density and subdivision on agriculture lands. Additional controls are needed to discourage development such as "gentlemen estates ", - large lot agricultural subdivisions catering s to a high -end market. Such development patterns a are largely opposed by the community. When this -0 type of development does occur, residences and farm dwellings should be clustered to preserve v the agricultural land and open space quality, while reducing costs of infrastructure and service provision. 2.3 Improving Agricultural Water o Infrastructure The ditches and irrigation systems = vestiges of the plantation era -'must be protected and restored. Without viable irrigation systems, the potential for intensive agriculture is jeopardized or lost. Irrigation reservoirs and ditches also retain and channel storm water away from settled areas. The State plans for and manages water infrastructure on State land through the State Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan. Private landowners maintain their own infrastructure, focusing on areas that are intensively farmed. Community partnerships such as the East Kaua'i Water Users Cooperative can also be instrumental in keeping irrigation systems functioning to serve agricultural operations. The condition of ditches outside those areas is variable and assumed to be deteriorating. An emerging issue is the permitting of water diversion from streams to feed agricultural ditch systems. Many diversions have operated for a long time under a revocable State permit. However, the State now requires that such diversions obtain a water lease. The water lease application process requires environmental and cultural studies, including analysis of inflow stream standards. This may result in stricter diversion limits, which will impact agricultural operations if stream flow decreases. 40 Important Agricultural Lands Study, 2015 41 Important Agricultural Lands Study, 2015 VI. ECONOMY 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 163 Produce at Koloa Sunshine Market, South Kaua'i District 2.4 Supporting Farmers and Access to Healthy Local Food On Kaua'i, there is an increasing demand for locally - grown, healthy food as evidenced in the rise of farmers markets and community garden initiatives. Throughout the public process, people expressed a desire for Kaua'i to "grow its own food" and decrease its dependence on imported food. Locally -grown food reduces the greenhouse gas emissions associated with "food miles traveled" and encourages resiliency and personal independence by reducing onds reliance on imported products. A strong agricultural sector will strengthen KauaTs self - sufficiency by increasing food and resource production for both local consumption and export. While opinions differ on what type of agriculture is suitable for Kaua'i, many agree that increased agricultural production will aid food self- sufficiency and economic diversification goals. Additionally, working farms supportthe cultural heritage and rural identity of Kaua'i. Food hubs are another tool used to support locally grown food. They help aggregate, distribute, and market products from local farmers. 164 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN The County can support the development of food hubs, such as the Kilauea Community Agricultural Center, or similar projects that connect people to arable land, and then farmers to buyers. 2.5 Expanding Aquaculture Aquaculture has existed on Kaua'i since the ancient Hawaiians harvested seafood from coastal fish ponds. Today Kaua'i has limited commercial aquaculture activity, including a farm producing over 400 metric tons of shrimp a year. There is opportunity for this industryto expand and capitalize on the increased global demand for seafood and decline in access to ocean stock. Due to its potential to help diversify agriculture and the economy, the Hawaii 2050 Sustainability Plan includes a goal to expand the development and commercialization of marine aquaculture. The State's Aquaculture and Livestock Support Services Branch provides support for this industry through business planning and development, as well through loans for start -ups. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 2 3 t� u ti 5. h a 6. 7 Ensure agriculture- designated lands are used for agriculture and related activities, including aquaculture, commercial forestry, and animal husbandry. Use urban growth boundaries or other land preservation easements to limit conversion of agriculture- designated lands to non - agricultural uses. Control the subdivision and alteration of agriculturally -zoned land to prevent the dissipation of agricultural potential, the loss of rural character, and the conversion of land use to urban land use designations. Provide criteria to allow clustering of allowable density for landowners of Important Agricultural Land (IAL). Require preservation of viable irrigation systems (-"both government -owned and privately owned -, to support the supply of irrigation water to farms. Support landowner and farmer - initiated designations of important agricultural lands that at least meet criterion number five of Act 183 (SLH 2005), "land with sufficient quantities of water to support viable agricultural production" Use IAL maps and tools when reviewing landowner /farmer - initiated petitions for the designation of IAL or for evaluating priority lands for IAL designation proposed by the State or County. Revise the agricultural property tax regime, including but not limited to the Agricultural Dedication program, to increase incentives to lease land for productive farms. 9. Clarify rules and authority related to permitting of agricultural structures and uses on IAL. 10. Include community gardens as a permitted use in residential areas. 166 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 11. Require that prospective buyers of property adjacent to agricultural land be notified through title report that they could be subject to inconvenience or discomfort resulting from accepted farming activities, pursuant to HRS Chapter 205 . Q05 —4.5 B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Consider the relationship and proximity of other land uses to agricultural land in planning efforts. Define "rural" and include its relationship to agriculture. 2. Update and implement the water inventory and management plan. 3. Improve upon or develop a system for local and export marketing of food and primary resources. 4. Monitor and report on KauaTs agricultural activity to understand local food production trends and water source issues. 5. Increase access to healthy food in underserved neighborhoods and build more equitable food systems, from cultivation to disposal. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Provide economic development programs to promote and support agriculture. 2. Reestablish an Agricultural Specialist position with the Office of Economic Development. 3. Supportthe Sunshine Markets and other means of marketing Kaua'i agricultural and food products to residents, businesses, and visitors. 4. Establish a minimum goal for designation of IAL. Improve the IAL program to effectively preserve high - quality agricultural land. Develop related County -level incentives, specificallyto encourage food production to increase self - reliance. 5. Increase incentives to lease land to small farmers through revisions to the agricultural property tax regime. 6. Improve water infrastructure for irrigation in priority areas, such as IAL. J From a permitting perspective, the County can examine its development standards to ensure it does not create unreasonable barriers to working from home. "Home Businesses" are permitted in every zoning district, but zoning restrictions may limit certain types of business operations. The CZO is silent on deliveries to residential uses, but prohibits "frequent bulk shipments "from orto a home business. Restrictions on permitted equipment may also limit the growth of cottage industries in residential areas. In addition to development code changes, more industrial land is needed to accommodate manufacturing and industrial uses outside of residential areas. The deficit of industrial lands outside of Uhu'e causes ,many small businesses, such as welding shops, abt6 repair,`and woodshops, to operate via a special use permit or illegally. One opportunity is to redevelop former plantation mill sites for manufacturing and industrial needs. 3.3 Fostering High Tech and Clean Tech Jobs The Pacific Missile Range Facilitity (PMRF), located on the West Side, is one of the foremost aerospace test sites in the U.S. PMRF leverages KauaTs location c in the center of the Pacific Ocean for the benefit of aerospace and space launch testing. The base supports approximately 900 civilian jobs and 75 active duty members. The 900 civilian jobs comprise $89.72 million and the 75 active duty members comprise approximately $7.5 million of the facility's $118 million operating budget in FY 2016. Historically, the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) has been the driving force behind the establishment of technology -based business on Kaua'i. PMRF's continued vitality contributes significantly to KauaTs high technology industry and provides opportunities for supportive businesses and entrepreneurs. The momentum of KIUC in pursuing ambitious renewable energy targets, coupled with KauaTs goals for emissions reductions in transportation and energy, also provides opportunities for clean technology businesses and green jobs. Clean tech tends to be low- or non - polluting, provide higher wage jobs, and supports sustainability goals. 3.4 Growing the Arts, Culture, and Creative Industry Kaua'i has served as a premier film, TV, and photo shoot destination for the past 80 years. Film and photo productions for major production companies and media outletsare regularlystaged here.Avibrant arts scene has flourished with the development of monthly or weekly "Art Nights" in communities around the island, including Hanapepe, Kilauea, and Kapa'a.The Kaua'iArts & Culture Feasibility Study Final Report (September 2015) found robust pockets of arts such as painting, woodworking, jewelry- making, and performing arts. Arts connected to Hawaiian, Japanese, and Filipino culture and traditions were also strong. --------------- w E kanu I ka hui 'oi ha'ule ka ua r p ( 5� A Plant the taro stalks while there is rain.Do your V/ work when opportunity the affords). �/✓ i� NOTE P"Od insicla. NOTE: -Wa nspose +hese words A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Lessen zoning restrictions for home -based businesses. 2. Reduce the costs and regulatory hurdles associated with starting a business. 3. Increase inventory of industrial zoned lands. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Implement and update the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS). 2. Develop business improvement districts and Main Street programs to fund revitalization efforts. VI. ECONOMY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 169 C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Invest in shared facilities and resources that can be utilized by multiple opportunity clusters, such as creative industries and technical services. 2. Provide infrastructure that increases the competitiveness of businesses on Kaua'i and allows them to thrive in all parts of the island. 3. Utilize County facilities and funds to support shared workspaces, makerspaces, and equipment for small businesses to utilize. 4. Support programs and infrastructure that enables employees to telecommute or work in satellite locations. 5. Attract technology and energy businesses that complement KauaTs economic and sustainability goals. 6. Build capacity for economic development in the target industry clusters identified by,,CED*s. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Build the capacity of existing and new and small businesses and increase the skills and readiness of KauaTs students and workforce. 2. Invest in opportunity industries that can diversify KauaTs economy and provide living wages. 3. Promote cross - sector linkages between KauaTs anchor and opportunity industries to grow the market for local products and services. 170 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 4. Support initiatives and programs to revitalize town centers and increase demand for local - serving businesses. 5. Provide business planning assistance, career planning, entrepreneurial training, incubation, and assistance with permitting, licensing, and regulatory issues. 6. Expand offerings for mentorship, networking, and affordable workspaces. 7. Support programs and initiatives that encourage manufacturing and support KauaTs maker economy. 8. Strengthen market linkages between the tourism industry and Kaua'i made products such as fashion, food, and music. 9. Expand opportunities for innovation and tech - based businesses. 10. Increase access to capital for small businesses and start-ups. 11. Educate businesses on financial planning and funding sources for hazard preparedness and recovery, including insurance options for business interruption, natural disasters, and other unexpected occurrences. Z Ke Kahua O Kaneiolouma in Po'ipu, South Kaua'i District S E CTO R.- V11. HERITAGE RESOURCES From ancient Oiiiu to Buddhist missions, heritage resources symbolize Kaua'i's history, showcase our diversity, and perpetuate a unique sense of place. By protecting these resources, Kaua'i will continue to honor its history, value its Native Hawaiian heritage, and celebrate its diverse languages and cultural traditions. Throughout Kaua'i there is an abundance of archaeological, cultural, historic, and scenic resources. Together these resources document KauaTs storied past, cultivate a unique sense of place, and educate new generations about their history. The Heritage Resources map highlights important historic sites, including those listed on the National Register and the Hawai'i Register of Historic Places. In addition, the map shows historic cultivation areas, priority public access points, and ahupua'a and moku boundaries. In recognition that environmentally significant places are part of our heritage, the map also includes streams, waterbodies, coral reefs, and critical habitat. As time goes on, our heritage resources will require more consistent and comprehensive attention to ensure their survival. Innovative ways to both protect and reuse historic resources should be utilized all while identifying new resources worthy of preservation. This section addresses Historic Buildings and Structures and Places; Wahi Pana, Cultural Sites, and Cultural Resources; ancbLandmarks and Scenic Resources. Nol-e ; remote, C�vnrv�u VII. HERITAGE RESOURCES 1 3.0 ACTIONS BYSECTOR 171 1. HISTORIC BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND PLACES Historic buildings and structures are critical to preserving Kaua'i's unique history, town character, and sense of place. It is our kuleana to ensure that each community's treasured structures are preserved and celebrated. 1.1 Recognizing and Designating Historic Buildings and Structures Kaua'i has approximately 60 buildingsand complexes listed on the National Register of Historic Places and/ orthe Hawai'i Registerof Historic Places. From the U.S. 3 Post Office on Rice Street to Russian Fort in Waimea, p these structures are visual reminders of KauaTs s� past. Some roads and bridges, including pedestrian 4 bridges and overpasses, also have unique features that are historically significant and contribute to a sense of place. Famous examples include the one- lane steel truss bridge at Hanalei River and Route 560. =a narrow ten mile road between Princeville and Ha'ena. mdasi, Designation requires review prior to demolition or renovation, and makes properties eligibleforfinancial assistance such as grants and tax incentives. The lead agency for all aspects of historic preservation is DLNR's Historic Preservation Division (SHPD). SHPD maintains an inventory of known historic sites and conducts surveys to identify and document new sites. Significant sites are placed on the Hawaii Register of Historic Places where they may then be nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. On the local level, the Kaua'i Historic Preservation Review Commission (KHPRC) works with landowners to recommend properties for designation. The Commission was established in 1987 to protect and 172 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN promote the County's historic resources, and maintain a County -wide inventory of historic resources. The Commission also administers the Local Certified Government program, which provides Federal assistance for historic preservation. Reviews of County permits and projects involving historic sites, structures, and districts are typically coordinated with KHPRC and SHPD. 1.2 Supporting Preservation through Standards and Incentives In addition to the KHPRC, the County supports preservation though development standards, as well as partnerships and targeted financial assistance. Property tax assessments and the Open Space Fund are existing County mechanisms that can also incentivize preservation. Compliance with modern building and zoning codes is often a challenge when renovating historic properties. Sensible alternatives to strict code requirements can make the difference between leaving a historic property to further deteriorate or be demolished, and allowing itto be restored and thrive with a new purpose.The historic nature of town cores can also be protected and promulgated through district -wide architectural and design standards. These ensure new development is in keeping with a town's historic character and that redevelopment occurs in a historically sensitive manner. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Broaden the types of uses allowed in historic structures. 2. Support the reuse and renovation of historic structures through building code amendments. 3. Update and create Special Planning Areas in towns to ensure new development and redevelopment of existing sites or structures is done in a "historically sensitive" manner. B. PLANS AND STUDIES Update and maintain the inventory and management plan for historic resources. V C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Maintain the character of historic structures and bridges. 2. Educate and encourage property owners to nominate structures and sites to the State and National Register of Historic Places. 3. Provide a real property tax exemption for historic properties, including commercial properties. 4. Explore utilizing the Open Space Fund for historic preservation purposes. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Preserve important historic buildings and structures that illuminate Kaua'i's history. 2. Establish a low- interest revolving loan fund for rehabilitation of historic properties. 2. WAH I PANA, CU LTU RAL S ITES, AND RESOURCES Wahi Pana and the resources that support cultural practices are the foundation of Kaua'i's identity. Culturally significant places and sites, once destroyed, cannot be replaced. These places and the stories behind them provide vital insight to how the ancient Hawaiians lived in harmony with the land and managed the use of natural resources in a sustainable manner. 2.1 Identifying and Preserving Wahi Pana and Archeological Resources Throughout Kaua'ithereare numerousarchaeological sites that document ancient Hawaiian habitation and culture. A traditional cultural property is defined as an area or place associated with the practices and beliefs of a living community. On Kaua'i these 9 u'ol Point Salt Pans, Hanapepe 'Ele'ele District FW01 o VII. HERITAGE RESOURCES 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 173 include heiau, burial sites, fishponds, taro fields, -"Oland other areas. Kaua'i has 30 archaeological sites s listed on the National Register of Historic Places or d'' the Hawai'i Register of Historic Places. Large scale sarcheological districts, such as the Na Pali Coast, are 14 listed in their entirety. All registered archaeological 1 sites are included in the Heritage Resources Map in 1 Chapter 5. Kauai has several areas eligible to be listed as o Historic Districts through the National Register of s Historic Places, including the Wailuanuiahoano ahupua'a and portions of the southern Olohena and Hanama'ulu ahupua'as. Continued research and inquiry is needed to establish if other historic assets might merit designation. In addition to formally listed sites, there are hundreds of other sites . eith - IrrFdocumentedjor inventoried by SHPD. Discoveries 4) of new cultural sites are generally triggered through sthe archaeological site surveys required for certain development activities. Burial sites are also important resources. In Native Hawaiian culture, burial sites are sacred since within the 'iwi (skeletal remains) resides a person's mana. Therefore, the proper treatment of Native Hawaiian skeletal remains and burial goods must be ensured. SHPD hasjurisdiction overthe management of burial sites over 50 years old, whether they are previously identified or inadvertently discovered. When new development uncovers burials, recommendations to relocate or preserve in place any'iwi are made by the Kaua'i Island Burial Council, with preference given to the wishes of the lineal descendants of the remains. 2.2 Perpetuating Cultural Practices through Restoration, Stewardship, and Education There is a strong and growing commitment to deepening awareness and knowledge of Native Hawaiian culture, stories, and practices. Attention and stewardship is needed to educate the community, N restore structures, and preserve the legacy of wahi bpana. Unfortunately, the significance of certain cultural sites is not always widely known. As a result, some sites sit unrestored and vulnerable to further damage through neglect, vandalism, and land- altering activities such as unpermitted grading. One model that could be replicated is that of Kaneiolouma = an ancient cultural complex which was restored through a stewardship agreement with the County and a community organization. 174 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PC 010 Other cultural sites still function as they did in historic times such as the salt making pans at Puolo Point. Important lo'i kalo, dry land field systems, and fishponds are examples of Hawaiian engineering tailored to particular ecological conditions. Protecting and restoring them is vital to the restoration of culture, Hawaiian way of life, flourishing ecosystems, and local food production. For example, the community - stewarded lo'i of Waipa and K2'e connect residents to the places where many no longer can afford to reside. Other culturally significant sites, such as known burial locations, are stewarded by Native Hawaiian families without a formal agreement. Residents also celebrate the ethnic diversity and cultural practices associated with KauaTs modern history. KauaTs plantation era and the legacy of migrant workers is recognized through events such asthe Koloa Plantation Days Celebration. 2.3 Raising Awareness of Place Names and Land Divisions The ability of people to recognize the significance of wahi pana helps "instills a sense of pride and curiosity about Native Hawaiian culture and history. Awareness of the original names and the stories behind them connect people to the island's history and culture. The Kaua'i Nui Kuapapa program is a joint effort between the County and community to raise public awareness �-{- of significant place names and historic land divisions. The names, history, and unique features of KauaTs,five moku and 54 ahupua'a are conveyed through signage and online information. The boundaries are shown in Figure 3 -13. 2.4 Protecting Kuleana Lands Prior to 1850, kuleana were "plots of land given, by the governing ali'i of an area, to an 'ohana or an individual as their responsibility without right of ownership "43 When land was privatized in 1850, less than one percent of all lands in Hawai'i were awarded ,-to Hawaiian maka'ainana families who lived on and tended the land. Extensive information was recorded about these parcels including family and place names,,, information on surroundings, hydrology, and cultivation. These lands are house sites, taro patches,,,some fishponds or salt pan and often contain'iwi. Lands where Hawaiian families continue to care for and live on lands in the same areas as 43 Puku'i & Elbert 1975 pahS� Figure 3 -13 Kaua'i Nui Kuapapa, Moku o Kaua'i - Kona Puna - Ko'olau - Halele'a _ Napali Niihau Ahupua'a Boundaries 1 in = 8 miles NORTH Miles I I I 0 5 10 20 VII. HERITAGE RESOURCES 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 175 a frames the Lihu'e District and divides it from the South Kaua'i District. Landforms such as Kalepa Ridge and Kilohana Crater have similar framing qualities and help define and characterize nearby communities as distinct settlement areas. Many landforms serve as landmarks and are prominent in Native Hawaiian history and 'olelo. Awareness of them is fundamental to understanding and appreciating KauaTs history. Preserving mountain and ocean views does not simply entail preventing them from being totally obscured, but also means not disrupting their integrity and 'intactness' with structures or other features that detract from their beauty and continuity. Preservation of landmarks and scenic resources is perhaps the most important aspect of maintaining the historic essence of Kaua'i over time, regardless of population growth, development, and other changes that will occur. The County's ability to preserve landmarks and scenic resources depends primarily on its zoning policies and abilitiesto acquire land for conservation. Since public funds to acquire land are limited, future preservation of landmarks and scenic resources must rely first and foremost on zoning and permitting regulations. 3.2 Maintaining the Integrity of Scenic Routes Scenic views along roadways are abundant on Kaua'i. Kaua'i already has one Federally recognized scenic byway, which runs through Koloa in South Kaua'i. Scenic byways do not just have scenic qualities, but are also recognized for their intrinsic archeological, cultural, historic, natural, and recreational features. Community Plans for each District provide an opportunity to identify specific roadways and features worthy of recognition and protection. 3.3 Protecting Exceptional Trees Exceptional trees and groves of trees are another resource important to preserving KauaTs rural character, intrinsic beauty, history, and culture. The County's Arborist Committee has designated 23 trees as "exceptional trees" on Kaua'i. The State's Exceptional Tree Act (Act 105) protects designated trees from improper trimming and unnecessary removal. Private property owners are provided a tax credit to offset the costs associated with tree maintenance. 178 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES Prepare amendments to the CZO, Special Management Area Rules, and the Subdivision Ordinance to provide specific criteria and guidelines for evaluating and protecting scenic views, view planes, and landmarks in the siting of new development. 2. Consider regulatory tools such as zoning overlays or corridors to preserve views from roads or public places to the ocean, and to and from mauka to makai. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Identify key landmarks, exceptional trees, and scenic resources through Community Plans. 2. Develop an inventory of scenic resources /views, view planes, visual resources, and key landmarks through the Kaua'i Historic Preservation Review Commission. 3. Support creation and implementation of corridor plans for historic and scenic roadways. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Support Kaua'i Nui Kuapapa and other efforts to spread awareness of KauaTs original place names. 2. Support implementation of the corridor management plan forthe Holo Holo Koloa Scenic Byway. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS $yweo4s 1. Support the Hawai'i Scenic(ff-yway Program. / 2. Support the Kaua'i Open Space Commission in identifying and acquiring priority open space areas. p of energy independence, and to provide enough Wflexibility so that strategies can adjust based on the best available information. Climate change mitigation efforts to increase energy conservation and reduce greenhouse gas emissions are also supported. C% Energy Efficiency and Conservation Energy conservation and efficiency measures are equally as important as renewable generation in s moving Kaua'i toward a clean energy transformation. Innovations in several areas will help to reduce our s energy load: W 1. Building Efficiency: Buildings can become 40- 1 -0 70 percent more efficient with implementation of supportive codes and standards between now and 2050.44 This applies to existing and new buildings. The County can lead by example by investing in LEED certified buildings, helping the local building __ industry to catch up with the rest of the Country in making LEED a standard practice. 2. Energy Storage: Bulk storage of electricity is -a needed to allow the utility to shift energy from periods of high production to periods of high demand. At the time of this plan, two approaches to bulk storage are under development by KIUC. They are (a) utility scale chemical batteries, and (b) pumped storage hydro. The industry is rapidly evolving, and other approaches, such as distributed storage or integration of electric vehicles, may become commercially viable in the near future. 3. Responsive Electric Loads: Electric utilities have traditionally provided electricity to customers whenever there is demand. In a 100 percent clean energy grid, customer demand itself will become a tool to manage the integration of variable sources of clean energy. Both price signals (time of use pricing) and demand response control at the equipment/ system level will aid utilities in managing the grid. The County has significant roles and opportunities to increase energy conservation and efficiency through code requirements, planning, incentives, and education to encourage behavioral changes by individuals and businesses. . ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 1.1 Conserving Energy and Becoming Sustainable KauaTs energy profile has evolved significantly in recent years. A combination of solar, hydro, and biomass generation projects accounted for only 13 percent of KIUC's energy sales in 2014, but rose to over 36 percent in 2015. Renewable resources can meet an average of 77 percent of KauaTs energy demand during peak solar hours, spiking to as much as 90 percent.45 KIUC has adopted an ambitious goal for renewable resources to generate at least 70 percent of KauaTs energy by 2030, surpassing the State's goal of 40 percent .46 Future progress on renewables will allow Kaua'i to become more energy self - reliant in a manner that is more environmentally sound and economically sustainable than reliance upon fossil fuels. Renewable energy projects that integrate additional benefits besides power production are also valuable. Solar arrays that are integrated with agricultural production are one example, as are water management projects that incorporate hydropower production. Landfill sites present opportunities for methane gas production, which can be stored and used for buses on Kaua'i. Increasing KauaTs renewable energy production capacity also represents a potentially significant contribution towards reducing the island's greenhouse gas emissions to help mitigate climate change. While much of renewable energy production depends on KIUC and private sector initiatives, the 45 Kaua'i Utility Reaches 90% Renewable Energy Utilization, 2016 44 Roadmap to Zero Emissions, Architecture 2030 46 KIUC Strategic Plan 2017 180 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN County can assist with the transition to renewable energy through various means including land use planning, economic development, transportation planning, and County government operations. Efforts to reduce energy consumption are just as important as power generation, particularly during nighttime hours when solar power generation is not available. Energy conservation begins at home, and technologies such as 'smart meters are available to KIUC customers to allow them to better manage their energy use. These and other measures have helped Kaua'i residents reduce their electricity consumption by an average of ten percentfrom 2007 levels. KauaTs average household electricity use of 465 kilowatt-hours per month was the lowest of any County in the State in 2013. As more renewable sources come online from public and private sources, and as more residents use smart meters, greater energy conservation and lower monthly energy bills will benefit residents and businesses. 1.2 Green Buildings and Structures 4. Require new buildings to incorporate economically feasible design and equipment to save energy. 5. Conduct an audit of the County's development standardsto identify regulationsthatare obstacles to- or could be altered to better encourage or requireJ green building practices. B. PLANS AND STUDIES conduc -+ 1. Work with the University of Hawai'i to do an ✓ islandwide study of energy crop production, and determine how much energy production comes from locally grown crops. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Install more solar energy systems on County facilities. 2. Pursue ground transportation energy conservation and alternative fuel projects. The energy efficiency of buildings has a great impact on total emissions. Green buildings are 3. Review County operations to identify ways to s conserve energy, particularly during nighttime sited, designed, constructed, and operated to be environmentally responsible and resource hours. efficient. The US Green Building Council estimates that green buildings reduce per person emissions D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS by over 50 percent, especially if that building is 1 J) located in a walkable environment. The most widely used benchmark for sustainable buildings is the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system -_- also called LEED. Currently, LEED 2. certification is voluntary and often encouraged / for major projects through conditions imposed _at• Planning Commission. There is an opportunity to encourage increasing the number of LEED buildings 3. through requirements and /or incentives. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE 4 CHANGES 1. Promote increased energy conservation and renewable energy production. 2. Optimize the mix of energy cropsthatcan provide fuel for power production on Kaua'i. 3. Streamline and expedite planning and permitting processes involving renewable energy facilities. Support the Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative (KIUC) and private initiatives for solar, biomass, hydro, and other clean energy production types. Identify sites where new renewable energy facilities might be co- located with other land uses. Continue regular monitoring of the amount of KauaTs energy production that is from fuel produced on the island. Support State and Federal efforts to price carbon, such as a carbon tax or fee and dividend programs. VIII. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 1 3.0 ACTIONS SY SECTOR 181 2. REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS As a leader in renewable energy, Kaua'i is transitioning from the use of fossil fuels for power generation. But we should not stop there. Doing our part to reduce carbon emissions from buildings, transportation, and other sources is our kuleana as global citizens. 2.1 Acknowledging the Paramount Challenge of Climate Change Since the 2000 General Plan, the impacts of climate change have become more apparent. They include coastal erosion, coral bleaching, higher temperatures, more frequent wildfires, reduced trade winds, increased frequency of tropical storms, and other impacts.The severity of these impacts over time will depend in large part upon the success of the global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. On one extreme is business as usual, where global average temperatures could increase more than four degrees Celsius by the year 2100, bringing much greater severity of all the aforementioned impacts and an unstable climate for centuries into the future. On the other extreme, an aggressive global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions could prevent average temperatures from increasing more than two degrees Celsius relative to pre - industrial levels, and could help to stabilize the climate. 2.2 Setting an Example and Goal for Emissions Reductions Policy makers at local and State levels have identified the need to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels for numerous reasons. In 1998, the State of Hawai'i completed a climate change action plan, which states: " Hawai'i can and should play a role in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change." In 2007, Act 234 was signed into law, and required the State to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. This milestone has already been achieved well ahead of schedule. However, much greater levels of emissions reductions are now in order. In 2014,the State adoptedthe Hawai'i Climate Change Adaptation Initiative (Act 83)to address the impacts of climate change on the State's economy, environment, and way of life. It established an Interagency Climate Adaptation Committee to develop a Sea Level Rise Vulnerability and Adaptation Report and Statewide Climate Adaptation Plan. In 2015, 195 countries signed on to the Paris Climate Agreement, which set a goal of limiting global temperature rise to within two degrees Celsius. To achieve this, the Agreement calls for rapid emissions reductions and full decarbonization bythe second half of the century. Though the United States has signaled that they will pull out of the agreement, Hawai'i is a member of the United States Climate Alliance which is a coalition of states committed to upholding the Paris Climate Agreement by "achieving the U.S. goal of reducing emissions 26 -28 percent from 2005 levels" by 2025. In support of achieving these goals, SB 559 was signed into law in 2017 which "requires the State to expand strategies and mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions statewide in alignment with the principles and goals adopted in the Paris Agreement" As discussed in previous sections, Kaua'i is already making progress in the renewable energy sector. In the ground transportation sector, Kaua'i County has laid the foundation for similar gains. The County Other sections of this document address the specific has retooled its roadway planning and is beginning concerns that arise when planning for sea level rise to build and rebuild streets with increased attention and related impacts of climate change. This section s to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. The local bus outlines KauaTs commitment to be part of the '� service has also continued to grow over the past solution to mitigating one of the factors that causes 3 decade and will be an essential component of a ow and exacerbates climate change; that is, reducing carbon;:ground transportation system. and ultimately eliminating our emissions, primarily The behavior and actions of individuals are critical to from the burning of fossil fuels. making these shifts happen. Like most US, residents, 182 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN V people on Kaua'i emit more than double the per capita world average greenhouse gas emissions per year. It is everyone's kuleana to look at ways they can reduce their personal carbon footprint, in keeping with the spirit of Kaua'i Kakou. In alignment with SB 559 and HawaiTs pledge to the United States Climate Alliance, the General Plan's policy is to reduce islandwide greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 -28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025, and 80 percent by 2050. Because those targets are lower than those deemed necessary by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Paris Climate Agreement to keep temperature change below 2 degrees Celsius, the County should aim forthe higher benchmark of 40 percent reductions by 2030. Statewide emissions for the year 2007 are shown in Figure 3 -14. Achieving an 80 percent reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2)emissionswill require awholesaletransformation of our electricity and transportation systems, and will have far r aching implications for other sectors such -Fo►r- rcacking 0 -T 3 0.I'? 1.C7 8.76 as tourism, agriculture, and consumption of imported goods. These systems have evolved over a century of increasing access to and growth in the use of fossil fuels. By achieving this level of emissions reductions, we will do our part to prevent global average temperatures from increasing. 2.3 Addressing Air Travel and Transportation While we have progressed with renewable energy production for electricity, we must address and find ways to reduce or offset the fossil fuel consumption of the transportation sector. Technological breakthroughs in electric vehicles and alternative fuels support emissions reductions, but until those technologies take hold and become affordable, reductions to fossil fuel consumption for transportation will largely depend on individuals changing personal travel patterns and behaviors. The airlines and visitor industry can also promote alternative fuels and carbon offset programs. Emissions from air travel to support both resident and visitor travel accounted for an approximately Figure 3 -14 Composition of Hawai'i GHG Emissions (Excluding Sinks, Including Aviation), 2007 (MMTCO2Eq) Transportation A Electric Power ■ Industrial Energy Waste Agriculture and Forestry (Sources) ■ Residential and Commercial Industrial and Processm VIII. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 183 equal share of petroleum use compared to ground transportation and electricity in 2013.The State's 1998 climate change action plan noted: "...the difficulty Hawaii faces in making significant reductions in its emissions. Jet fuel is essential to Hawai'i's tourism - based economy and the wellbeing of its people." Since that time, the airline industry has made considerable strides in improving per passenger efficiency through both aircraft technology and seat management. However, growth in tourism has offset much of these gains and aviation emissions remains a critical challenge. This is particularly true in Hawai'i due to our much greater dependence on air travel than in less isolated communities. Although local government influence over airline emissions is very limited, the County, with help from the State, can regularly track these emissions and assure that the industry is meeting the commitments it has laid out to fit into a lov4aarbon society in the coming decades. low- cavbov, 2.4 Inventorying Greenhouse Gases According to the State of Hawaii Greenhouse Gas Inventory of 1990 and 2007, Kaua'i contributed 1.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent gases in 2007. These emissions were primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels for electricity, ground transportation, and air transportation. L_ 11 emissions associated with the manufacture, production, and delivery of imported goods we use will be an important component of our efforts. 2.5 Planning for Climate Action A community -led climate action planning process is needed to maintain progress toward the long -term emissions reduction goal. Such a process will need to be maintained with an ongoing commitment both by the County and by community partners. Focus on key sectors and their interrelationships will be necessary to continue progress in emissions reductions. Key sectors include infrastructure, ground transportation, tourism, consumption and materials management, food and agriculture, and natural resource management. The process should seek to continually integrate climate change mitigation and adaptation goals to a greater and greater extent with existing planning processes including the General Plan, Community Plans, and individual sector plans as they are revisited. Finally, successful climate action planning will hinge on continuous engagement across the community. The majority of KauaTs greenhouse gas emissions are the result of individual choices overthe short and long term by Kaua'i residents and businesses. Engaging the people in our community and encouraging them to take ownership of the process will be key to gaining the support and collaboration needed for long -term Maintaining an accurate green ouse gas inventorywi success. be critical to tracking progress as we movetowards our 2.6 Transformation as Opportunity goals. The State Department of Health is completing KauaTs extensive fossil fuel dependence means that its third sector -based statewide greenhouse gas there is a large task ahead to transform, and ultimately inventory. Future efforts should include building an decarbonize, KauaTs economy. There will be many inventory tool that automatically updates from various benefitsto making this transformation. Clean energy in data sources, as opposed to the current practice of the electricity sector already provides local jobs, helps periodic, static reporting. Sector based emissions stabilize electricity costs, and reduces dependence tracking is relatively straightforward, with data already on imported fossil fuels. Transforming the ground available from .multiple sources, and several well- transportation sector will encourage healthier living, established protocols existing for municipalities that revitalize neighborhoods and downtown business are accepted on an international level. areas, and allow those with limited mobility more Notably, current inventories do not reflect the greenhouse gas emissions embodied in the significant volume of consumer goods imported to Kaua'i every year. Portland, Oregon, and Oakland, California, two of the firstjurisdictions to analyze consumption based emissions in their community, found that emissions from consumer goods accounted for approximately twice the amount of greenhouse gas produced by other sectors. In order to effectively manage our emissions, tracking and managing the embodied 184 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN options forgetting where they need to go. Addressing tourism and air travel will be very challenging, but KauaTs commitment to sustainability will resonate with the values of modern travelers. We must study our island systems and how they function, so that we can find ways of reducing or substituting fossil fuel use. This will involve researching and integrating new technologies, as well as finding ways to increase efficiency or useless fuel. For example, in ground transportation, Kaua'i can make headway Electric Vehicle Parking & Charging Station, Lhu'e District VIII. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 185 JQ' through broader adoption of electric vehicles. It will kl0 maximizing energy efficiency and minimizing the also be essential to reduce vehicle miles travelled use of fossil fuel resources on the grid. through mode shift. We also need to work toward land use patterns that create higher density communities 3. Accelerate the transition to alternative, carbon - that are less auto - dependent over the long term. The free fuels in the ground transportation sector General Plan actions for Climate Change Mitigation with regulations and policies that support support these goals. electric vehicle adoption and other alternative fuel infrastructure. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE 4. Require large new developments and CHANGES infrastructure projectsto include a project carbon 1. Promote higher density residential development footprint analysis estimating the anticipated near job centers and amenities, while strongly change in emissions resultant from the proposed discouraging development that will require project and documenting the emissions residents to commute via automobile to jobs in reduction strategies deployed by the project to other areas of the island. minimize its emissions. 2. Reduce the carbon footprint of both new 5. Support continued reductions in emissions from and existing buildings and infrastructure by local energy production. Electric Vehicle Parking & Charging Station, Lhu'e District VIII. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 185 B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Develop a climate plan that focuses on key sectors and their interrelationships with respect to emissions reductions, to be updated every five years. Include intermediate year emissions reductions for all major sectors. ✓/ 2. Accelerate zero waste strategies, including policies and actions that encourage island residents to move towards lower levels of consumption, and to reuse materials to the maximum extent possible. 3. Conduct a greenhouse gas emissions inventory for the County. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Support a methane and biogas capture and containment project at the Kekaha Landfill. 2. Support carbon offset projects, such as growing trees to sell as carbon credits. 186 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Share best practices regarding climate planning, including support for system -wide carbon fees or taxes at the state or national level. 2. Meet emissions reductions goals through partnerships within the electricity, transportation, tourism, agriculture, waste, and small business sectors. Collaborate to establish short term, intermediate, and long term (2050) emissions reduction targets in ground transportation, electricity, air transportation /tourism, and consumption and materials management. 3. Increase the availability of building energy performance information around the island for both the residential and commercial sectors. codes and wind loading requirements. Emergency warning systems and communications systems need to be kept in good working order. Small businesses, as the backbone of KauaTs economy, should have continuity plans and assistance so they can bounce back quickly following disasters. 1. POLICE, FIRE, OCEAN SAFETY, AND EMERGENCY SERVICES Our first responders are critical to maintaining health and safety on our island. As the population grows, we need to do our part to ensure that police, fire, and emergency services are supported and that our resident and visitor populations are educated about ocean safety and fire prevention. 1.1 Ensuring the Safety of the Resident and Visitor Population handles fire code review and enforcement. There is at least one station in each planning district capable of addressing all basic fire and medical calls. Kaua'i had 135 firefighters in 2015, which translates to two firefighters per 1,000 persons. This ratio is favorable compared to the national average of approximately 1.76 firefighters per 1,000 persons. This level of expansion would require adding two or three new fire stations, most likely in Kilauea, Koloa, and Lihu'e. A related infrastructure issue is that certain bridges are undersized to handle larger emergency response vehicles. The Fire Department's hazardous materials ( "hazmat�) operations were previously focused on environmental accidents in industrial centers and on transportation corridors. With the increased national focus on terrorism since 2001, current hazmat responsibilities must also address chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and environmental hazards from foreign or domestic terrorism. The needed skills sets and testing equipment to address these responsibilities have required significant additional training. 1.2 Promoting Ocean Safety As a community with substantial marine recreational activity, the Fire Department's role in ocean safety is extremely important for residents and visitors. KauaTs shorelines are popular and attractive for swimming, 7 surfing,and otherwatersports.They are also notoriously iz dangerous, particularly for weaker and inexperienced 3, swimmers. The Fire Department is responsible for the KauaTs police, fire, and emergency service O S f P h' h I d I'f d departments provide a wide range of security an emergency response duties for residents and visitors. cean a ety _ rogram w is inc u es ten i eguar dtowers, three jet -ski operations around the island, and 45 Water Safety Officers. Education and community awareness programs also support improved water KauaTs three police stations are located in Hanalei, Waimea, and L-ihu'e, with a force of 161 police positions. Kaua'i had a ratio of 1.79 officers for every 1,000 persons in 2015 (including residents and visitors), but the size of the police force has not expanded in over 25 years. In order to achieve the national average for police presence, Kaua'i would need to add 109 officers by 2035 to service the projected residential and visitor population .47 KauaTs Fire Department respondsto multiple types of / u° hazards, including structural and outdoor fires, ocean: and back - country rescues, aircraft accidents, and hazardous materials emergencies. The Department also conducts fire inspections and investigations, and 47 Adequacy of Future Infrastructure Analysis, 2016 188 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN safety. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Maintain effective levels of public safety services to protect the growing population. 2. Upgrade and enhance facilities to address existing vulnerabilities and support necessary growth in emergency response personnel. a cS S 0 k! o � W 0 B. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Upgrade bridges in key areas to ensure emergency vehicles can service all residents and visitors. 2. Construct new fire stations to accommodate anticipated growth in the firefighting force. 3. Strive to attain a police force, fire fighting force, and water safety officer force whose coverage meets or exceeds national standards. 4. Support continuous training for all emergency response officers. 5. Encrypt County radio communications systems C. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Support the State and County's coordinated response system to wildfires. 2. Implement and update the Kaua'i Community Wildfire Protection Plan. 3. Strengthen hazard monitoring systems, such as stream flow and river gauges. 4. Participate in quarterly disaster response training and exercises. op— y BEACH RULES UNPREDICTABLE WAVES 8. CURRENTS ROCKS 8. CORAL IN WATER MAY BE HAZARDOUS SWIM AT YOUR OWN RISK NO LIFEGUARD ON DUTY Beach Rules Sign, East Kaua'i. Photo by Travis Okimoto 2. HAZARDS RESILIENCY There is probably no greater challenge to a community's resilience than a natural disaster, like Hurricane`Iniki which struck Kaua'i in 1992. Hurricane'Iniki affected all community members, regardless of their age or economic status. Strengthening resilience to these types of events will require the community and County government to function as one'ohana. Hazards resiliency is built on coordination amongst the community, all levels of government, and the private sector to mitigate against, prepare for, respond to, and recover from natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other threats and hazards. 2.1 Responding to Natural Disasters and Emergencies Surges KauaTs most common natural hazards include flooding, wildfire, storm surge, tsunamis, and hurricanes. The Hazard Map identifies vulnerable areas including extreme tsunami and tsunami evacuation zones, wildfire risk areas, and flood zones. Dams, critical facilities, and emergency shelters are also shown. The Kaua'i Emergency Management Agency (KEMA), Police Department, Fire Department, State DLNR, and Army National Guard have extensive responsibilities in the event of natural disasters. It is important that first responders have effective communications systems, high levels of training, and emergency supplies that are well protected. KEMA coordinates the County response to all hazardous weather events and operates a network of evacuation shelters in partnership with the Department of Education and the American Red Cross. They also monitor and respond to infectious IX. PUBLIC SAFETY& HAZARDS RESILIENCY 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 189 PROTECT HAWAIIAN MONK SEALS... LET SLEEPING SEALS LIE NCtf'BSHMLh IINGUISrU MAMA SMLNI By CA \G soua snoTHEw Nn SEALN TUNE t lY C�Un� rNi nwnR sot rronin[ �r (808) 983 -5715 (24 HRS) Beach Rules Sign, East Kaua'i. Photo by Travis Okimoto 2. HAZARDS RESILIENCY There is probably no greater challenge to a community's resilience than a natural disaster, like Hurricane`Iniki which struck Kaua'i in 1992. Hurricane'Iniki affected all community members, regardless of their age or economic status. Strengthening resilience to these types of events will require the community and County government to function as one'ohana. Hazards resiliency is built on coordination amongst the community, all levels of government, and the private sector to mitigate against, prepare for, respond to, and recover from natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other threats and hazards. 2.1 Responding to Natural Disasters and Emergencies Surges KauaTs most common natural hazards include flooding, wildfire, storm surge, tsunamis, and hurricanes. The Hazard Map identifies vulnerable areas including extreme tsunami and tsunami evacuation zones, wildfire risk areas, and flood zones. Dams, critical facilities, and emergency shelters are also shown. The Kaua'i Emergency Management Agency (KEMA), Police Department, Fire Department, State DLNR, and Army National Guard have extensive responsibilities in the event of natural disasters. It is important that first responders have effective communications systems, high levels of training, and emergency supplies that are well protected. KEMA coordinates the County response to all hazardous weather events and operates a network of evacuation shelters in partnership with the Department of Education and the American Red Cross. They also monitor and respond to infectious IX. PUBLIC SAFETY& HAZARDS RESILIENCY 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 189 disease outbreaks with the Department of Health. KEMA works with Federal agencies such as the National Weather Service and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center to ensure Kaua'i residents and visitors receive life- saving information on potential hazards in a timely manner. In the event of a major disaster, KEMA directs Federal disaster relief efforts, as well as recovery dollars, to ensure disaster relief funds reach communities in need and restore essential services as quickly as possible. Currently, KEMA is staffed with only six employees. To keep pace with the projected growth of the resident and visitor population, KEMA will need to increase the number of permanent positions in the organization, and the equipment and software packages it uses to fulfill its coordination functions will require improvement, expansion, and modernization. 2.2 Creating Resilient Communities and Prepared Citizens Kaua'i understands the importance of planning and preparation at the individual and neighborhood levels. Depending on the scale and duration of the event, it could be days or weeks before recovery efforts begin in isolated neighborhoods. Consequently, some communities have developed their own plans and procedures for emergency response. The Hanalei to Ha'ena Community Disaster Resilience Plan (2014) provides a model that other communities can follow. The County provides information, programs, and resources to support community based preparedness efforts, such as Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training to individuals and groups. The ultimate goal is to have CERT teams in every neighborhood. The Kauai Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment (2014) focused on the coastal hazards presenton Kaua'i (erosion, flooding, wave inundation, and wind) and how these hazards are affected by climate change and sea level rise. KauaTs Multi- Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan (MMRP) (2015) includes a definition of resilience that encompasses the need to strengthen and support community, economy, and environment alike: "The communities of Kauai County actively build resilience through local planning and environmental initiatives. This resilience of the communities enhances their ability to withstand 190 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN the impacts of disasters and longer term effects of climate change. Focus on agriculture and local livelihoods enhances sustainability, and will enable survival should catastrophic events occur that prevent imported products from reaching Kauai. Environmental restoration efforts in the ahupua'a of Kauai have improved the ecological resilience of the environment." Recommendations from both documents are U incorporated into subsection actions. Z 2.3 Public Safety and the Tsunami Zone Many transient vacation rentals are located within 4) tsunami evacuation areas. Unlike resorts, which have tsunami evacuation plans and procedures in place to protect guests, visitors staying in units without onsite S managers may be less prepared and more vulnerable o should a disaster occur.° Tsunami and hazard' information should be provided before booking occurs, so visitors are aware their accommodation is W located in a hiah hazard area. �j 2 Vacation rentals may not be equipped with emergency supplies or adequate information about warning sirens, evacuation shelters, and other important safety information. Informing visitors about tsunamis and other natural hazards should begin before they arrive on island at the time of booking. Educational materials should be readily available and prominently displayed. Clear signage indicating the tsunami evacuation area and evacuation routes will help those unfamiliar with the island to reach safety. Actions that encourage hazards resiliency and community preparedness are provided below. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODES 1. Minimize coastal development in areas of high risk of erosion, flooding, tsunami inundation, and sea level rise. 2. Provide for adequate emergency shelters and communication systems in all planning districts. 3. Periodically review building codes and permitting standards for alignment with disaster , is >reduction��° efforts: "NOTE: s uce risk .\dd : (D'RR) p 4. Designate areas to serve as public shelters when designing and constructing new public buildings. 5. Include conditions in transient vacation rental and homestay permits that require disclosure to visitors and occupants of hazard risks and instructions for evacuation in cases of natural hazards, such astsunamis, hurricanes, orflooding. Require disclosure of hazards prior to reserving or booking. B. PLANS AND STUDIES D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1 2 1. Encourage community based disaster resilience plans and incorporate components into future Community Plan updates. Plans should include 3 an assessment of risks and vulnerabilities in the local economy to hazards. 2 3 Q 5 Develop an inventory of Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources, according to the standards of the National Incident Management System (NIMS), which can be used for mitigation and disaster recovery efforts. Work with the State Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands (OCCL) to update the Coastal Erosion Mitigation Plan for Kaua'i. Identify and index communitiesthat have existing disaster resilience plans. Provide support to current and ongoing community hazard risk reduction, mitigation, and planning efforts. Periodically review and update the multi- hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS !:I 5 2 7 1. Ensure that the County's GIS database, including all maps, data, and hazard information, is consistently available to all agencies. Facilitate g data sharing through participation in the Hawai'i Geographic Information Coordination Council. 2. Update, maintain, and enhance the use of the County's GIS and database to improve decision - making and ensure consistency in planning, permitting, and construction regulations to q reduce disaster risk. Designate evacuation routes, critical facility access routes, and public shelters in cooperation with local communities. Encourage storage of food and water in communities in order to encourage local recovery. Encouragethe integration of agricultural planning and coordination into disaster risk management to improve local food security, sustainability, and community resilience to hazards. Plan for maintenance of critical facilities and infrastructure in the event of a hazard. Identify mitigation opportunities in utility service plans and implementation resources. Improve public awareness materials distributed by the County through periodic updating with the best available data and maps. Enhance channels to the community by distributing materials at outreach and community events, via online and printed media, discussion on radio and news media, and by incorporating into the process of community resilience planning. Improve data gathering and accounting for risk and vulnerability assessments for wind, droughts, and wildfires. In assessing telecommunications vulnerabilities and planning pre- disaster preparedness measures, consult with the Utility Disaster Preparedness and Response Group for advice and recommendations. Utilize local communications networks, community organizations, and local information sharing modes, both traditional and new (such as social media), to disseminate warning, response, and preparedness info. Include local communications strategies in resilience plans. Ensure that existing designated shelter and critical services are built or retrofitted to withstand projected hazard scenarios. Incentivize and encourage residents and hotels to integrate hardened shelters into their structures. IX. PUBLIC SAFETY & HAZARDS RESILIENCY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 191 10. Reduce 'flash fuels! such as dry vegetation in high use areas and encourage vegetation clearing and clean -up programs. w 11. Assess the need for.and make shelter facilities accessible to special needs groups, pet owners, and unique local conditions. 12. Ensure the capacities of shelters, infrastructure, and critical facilities can accommodate the population exposed to catastrophic events Figure 3 -15 Impacts of Climate Change on Kaua'i t*� Extreme Events Changing tSurface Air Temperature Rising Rainfall Changing t*.� Winds and Waves Changing tSea Surface Temperature Rising 4 according to recent census numbers, projected growth models, and projected hazard scenarios. 13. Support the development of a Common Operational Picture, which incorporates real -time asset status tracking for Emergency Management. kw+?( t Sea Level Rising Ocean Heat Content Rising Ocean Chemistry Changing Source: Pacific Islands Regional Climate Assessment 192 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN ' Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Rising Habitats and Species Distributions Changing Baseflow in Streams Decreasing 3. GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION Climate change and its associated symptoms could have wide - ranging impacts to Kauai's environment, economy, and way of life. Understanding and incorporating the best available information on climate change is critical to planning effectively and taking proactive measures to adapt to climate - related changes. 3.1 Anticipating Climate Change Impacts There is substantial documentation of global warming trends over previous decades, but predicting the rate and extent of future warming and associated sea level rise is difficult. Based on the best available science we should plan forthree feet ofsea level rise. ltisimportant .to note that these estimates may be conservative, as some studies project upwards of 6 feet of sea level rise by 2100. The greatest uncertainty surrounding the projections is the rate and magnitude of ice sheet loss primarilyfrom Greenland and WestAntarctica. Further, the rate and magnitude of sea level rise is dependent on worldwide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas o emissions. Given the range of uncertainty, the National .i Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) frecommends a scenario =based planning approach that balances the degree of potential change with the tolerance for risks associated with that change. For example, new infrastructure with a long anticipated life would represent very low risk tolerance while an uninhabited area with no endangered species could tolerate greater risk from climate change impacts. Coastal areas are expected to experience the greatest amount of change, which in turn will impact the roughly 20 percent of Kaua'i residents who live near the shoreline. There are many pieces of critical infrastructure along the coast and in lo�oying areas, I ow - lyix,9 including roads and bridges, harbors, wastewater and storm water systems, potable water systems, and energy facilities. Climate change could impact several other aspects of KauaTs environment, economy, and daily life, such as agricultural production, tourism and recreation, and wetlands or other important natural habitats. Climate change is also prompting the movement of people away from vulnerable coastal areas, and in some cases, whole islands. The State of Hawai'i has already received some of the world's first climate immigrants from low -lying Pacific nations such as the Marshall Islands and Micronesia.48 Climate change can also impact food security, as evidenced by the widespread and severe droughts in California over the past several years. With approximately 90 percent of ourfood being produced outside of Hawai'i, this is an important issue for Kaua'i. Kaua'i residents will be facing these challenges for decades and even centuries into the future. Water supply may also be impacted by climate change, especially if HawaiTs convective rainfall patterns are disrupted. Increased evapotranspiration y will make KauaTs arid environments, such as the West .0 Kaua'i plateau, more dry and may impact agriculture as well. Fortunately, saltwater intrusion into the aquifer is not considered a major threat due to the buoyancy of salt water and the low permeability of the caprock in coastal areas. Ocean acidification will also impact 1 J marine environments such as coral reefs ' thus , having a great impact on KauaTs fisheries. Figure 3 -15 depicts the various impacts that climate change could have on KauaTs natural and built environment. 3.2 Planning for Adaptation The Kauai Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment (2014) was prepared as a technical study for the General Plan. It discusses the likely coastal hazard impacts of climate change and suggests measures for adaptation, resiliency, and mitigation. The Kauai Multi - Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan (2015) also examines natural hazards with an emphasis on an integrated and collaborative approach to risk reduction and building community resiliency. Initial mapping of sea level rise (SLR) inundation in selected areas of Kaua'i was done utilizing data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association' kV C)A R 48 As Pacific Islands Flood, A Climate- Driven Exodus Grows, Scientific American, 2013 IX. PUBLIC SAFETY & HAZARDS RESILIENCY 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 193 NOTE : ve+yU>V e.- ✓ rOAA), Digital Coast Sea Level Rise Viewer. The areas modeled include 1 foot, 3 foot, and b foot SLR scenarios for shorelines in Waimea, Hanapepe, Po'ipu, Nawiliwili, Wailua, Kapa'a, Anahola, Hanalei, and Ha'ena. Appendix D includes SLR maps of these areas. They illustrate the types of impacts that might occur, and act as a screening tool to identify vulnerable areas that may require further study, or where dense development should be avoided. The maps only depict still waterflooding and do not show erosion or wave inundation impacts. They serve as an interim planning and assessment tool until new hazard maps are released by University of Hawai'i researchers. This data, combined with FEMA flood maps, was used to evaluate and refine the General Plan Land Use Maps in Chapter 5. Responding to climate change will require a comprehensive approach with actions that cut across many sectors. Since the rate and extent of climate change is uncertain, an "adaptive management" approach is best suited to deal with the inherent uncertainties. Also needed is a framework to address the impacts of climate change. Adaptive management is dependent upon the constant and thorough monitoring of climate change variables, building and revising different scenarios, and developing flexible response mechanisms and actions. One recent County action was to revise the shoreline setback ordinance by an additional 20 feet to account for sea level rise and associated impacts. The shoreline setback ordinance should be revisited over time as new sea level rise information and projections become available. Effectively dealing with climate change will require cooperation and participation by all Kaua'i residents, businesses, institutions, and government. Because the General Plan influences the earliest stages of the development process, it provides an important opportunity to prevent and mitigate the impacts of potential future disasters associated with climate change. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES Use the best available climate and hazard science to inform and guide decisions. Determine a range of locally relevant (context specific) sea level rise projections for all stages of planning, project design, and permitting reviews. At the time of this General Plan Update publication, the science suggests a planning target of three feet of sea level rise. 2. Regularly review and refine relevant policies, rules, and regulations based on the most currently available climate and hazard science and projections. 3. Identify lands /areas that may serve as buffers from coastal hazards and restrict development within them. 4. Periodically update the shoreline setback and coastal protection article of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to allow for adjustments in the setback calculations based upon best - available SLR data. 5. Update the Floodplain Management Program to -� incorporate sea level rise planning information, utilizing options detailed in the Kauai ,3 Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment or other relevant resources. v b. Within the Special Management Area (SMA) and Zoning Permit program: (a) o Require applicants to analyze Z coastal hazard impacts and include mitigation in permit applications; (b) Impose development conditions upon Flooding in Kapa'a, East Kaua'i District. Photo Courtesy Hawai'i Emergency Management Agency 194 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 7 V �v 0 Z 8 a permits that minimize the impacts of exacerbated flooding, storm surge, and erosion due to sea level rise; (c) Strengthen rebuilding restrictions for non - conforming structures such that these structures are relocated a safe distance from the shoreline in hazardous areas; and; (d) Add 6 conditions that prohibit shoreline armoring. NOTE: r-e_-rn 0 Vw- comma Update the subdivision standards to: (a) Restrict residential subdivisions in areas prone to current and future coastal hazards, including sea level university, government, and private efforts to develop planning information and guidance to address how accelerated sea level rise will affect erosion rates and wave inundation. Support implementation of the Hawai'i Climate Adaptation Initiative (Act 83) and development of the Sea Level Rise and Vulnerability Adaptation Report for Hawaii and the Statewide Climate Adaptation Plan. rise; and; (b) Outside of these natural hazards C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS areas, provide for conservation subdivisions or cluster subdivisions in order to conserve 1 environmental resources. Periodically update the building codes to ensure that the standards for strengthening and elevating construction to withstand hazard forces in hazardous areas utilize the best available science and planning information. When considering project alternatives during the environmental review process, evaluate relocation outside of hazardous areas, elevation of structures, and "soft" hazards such as beach nourishment. When considering environmental mitigation, incorporate climate resilience measures. B. PLANS AND STUDIES In accordance with Hawai'i State Planning Act Priority Guidelines, consider multiple scenarios of SLR and associated flooding, wave inundation, and erosion impacts when developing and approving capital improvement projects. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS Work with the State Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to ensure conservation lands have appropriate vegetative ground cover to prevent soil erosion, including native and non- native plant species appropriate for PLfu Ka Pele and Na Pali -Kona Forest Reserve locations. 2. Ensure consistent public access to communications, warning systems, roads, and infrastructure in remote areas in the event of a hazard. 1. Conduct detailed hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessments for critical infrastructure and low- 3 lying coastal communities when updated sea level rise, erosion rates, and wave inundation information is available. 2 9 11 Identify priority planning areas where resources and planning efforts need to be focused and identify how and where to use adaptation strategies such as accommodation, retreat, and protection. Encourage strategic retreat and relocation to safer areas based on the results of the assessments above. Use results of hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessments to inform adaptation strategies to be incorporated into Community Plans or other planning processes. 5. Acknowledge, support, and /or take part in Consider incentive programs, such as a tax incentive program or a transfer of developments rights program, to relocate potential or existing development out of hazardous or sensitive areas. Consider creating a relocation fund through increased development fees, in lieu fees, or other funding mechanisms. IX. PUBLIC SAFETY & HAZARDS RESILIENCY 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 195 Bon Dance in Puhi, Lhu'e District SE(: -TO R -. X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL The General Plan's goals include Kauai being a place with healthy and resilient people, and to be an equitable place with opportunity for all. These goals mutually reinforce and are essential to the overall 2035 Vision. Quality of life is impacted by the built environment. Environmental factors include, : the affordability of housing; the ability to walk or bicycle to key destinations; the safety of streets, parks, and schools; access to health care and public services; the availability of healthy foods and quality education; and access to recreational areas that support active lifestyles. In improving the built environment, its is particularly important that we prioritize vulnerable populations, such as the keiki and kupuna who are most in need. 196 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN This section addresses Social Equity, Access to Quality Education and Training, Community Health, and Access to Recreational and Subsistence Activities. These issues touch all of society across S different communities, generations, and ethnicities. - They are crosscutting by nature, and have far. U reaching impacts on our lives. The proposed actions are focused on increasing community resilience and 1 bettering health outcomes through improving the 4� natural, built, and social environment. 1. SOCIAL EQUITY Social equity is critical in promoting healthy and diverse communities on Kaua'i. We can achieve this by expanding access to economic opportunity, quality education, affordable housing, and health services, and ensuring that notone racial or income group is unfairly disadvantaged. rfoTE. remove, 1.2 Caring for Our Most Vulnerable The General Plan prioritizes the needs of those that are the most vulnerable and marginalized through identifying priority equity areas around the island (Figure 3 -16). The map shows the priority equity areas, and the Census Designated Places with high percentages of minority households and households experiencing poverty. • LTu'e- Puhi- Hanama'ulu (Lihu'e District) • Anahola (East Kaua'i District) • Koloa (South Kaua'i District) woTi�:: re*y%ove. space' • Hanapepe-' Ele 'ele(Hanapeperue'eleDistrict) '%/ • Kaumakani (Waimea - Kekaha District) 3� 1.3 Strengthening Community Networks o Strong community networks are essential for healthy 0 and resilient communities. This means individuals, 1.1 Celebrating Kaua'i's Diversity by organizations, and businesses that know and take's Addressing Equity Issues care of one another in the spirit of kakou. It means a healthy ecosystem of non - profit and community Recognizing, celebrating, and serving all forms of T5ase& organizations that can strengthen and diversity contributes to a sustainable society. Kaua'i E enhance government efforts to address social has an extremely diverse population by national £ issues through partnerships. It also means healthy standards with 67 percent of the population individuals and families that can meet their basic identified as a minority race .49 Demographic shifts needs so thatthey can care for one another and their are also occurring, with changes in household greater community. composition and increases in the percentage of the population aged 65 and older. As a multiracial community, Kaua'i values its diversity and recognizes the need to embrace all cultures. However, there are still inequities in health, economic status, and access to housing, education, jobs, and services. Moreover, some of these inequities are concentrated in specific communities. Given these inequities, the County should ensure equitable access to housing, transportation, parks, and facilities. By increasing investment and focusing improvementsin disadvantaged communities, overall community wellbeing and health will improve. This also means expanding choices and services to those with limited options. In addition to infrastructure investment and services, the County should look for ways to increase community engagement in disadvantaged communities and with groups not well represented in planning processes. f 49 US,Census Bureau, 2010 Conditions such as poverty, lack of education, crime, houselessness, discrimination, and violence erode our community relationships. Sprawling growth that moves people and businesses away from town centers weakens rural communities. Weaker social networks and less cohesive neighborhoods are associated with higher rates of violent crime and health issues including depression, smoking, and alcohol and drug abuse. Vibrant, cohesive neighborhoods provide people with opportunities to gather, meet, and converse in public places.This includes venues for art and culture, ample public spaces, pedestrian- oriented streets, and community events that bring people together and inspire civic pride. Strategies to support this are included in the sector actions for Housing, Shared Spaces, Transportation, and Heritage Resources. X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 197 V V Princeville Kilauea Ha`ena __ _ Figure 3 -16 Social Equity Map Planning District Boundary Impoverished Population % Major Roads 2.6% - 5% Roads 5.01 % - 10% • Priority Equity Area 10.01 % - 15% — 15.01%-20% 20.01% - 23.8% 198 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Koloa j P pu NOTE: backwc�vcl 'r7kihct 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Minority Race % - < 35% - 35.1% - 50% 50.1%-65% - 65.1% - 80% - 80.1% - 100% VV1 I/ c� 3 1.4 Protecting Native Hawaiian Rights There is a state -wide movement to restore Native Hawaiian rights and lands; to obtain reparations for past and ongoing use of trust lands; and to attain a sovereign Native Hawaiian government. It is important to set forth Native Hawaiian rights and to define the role of the County government in this movement. Underthe State Constitution and the County Charter, the County of Kaua'i is empowered to promote the health, safety, and welfare of all inhabitants without discrimination as to ethnic origin. As part of carrying out its responsibilities under the Constitution and the Charter, the County recognizes the rights of Native Hawaiiar5 and laws concerning lands and waters that have been established through the State Constitution, State and Federal laws, and State and Federal court decisions. No County ordinance or rule shall modify or diminish these rights: • Native Hawaiian water rights provided under GI.w a v ti 2 t4,'W i `i Revi Se -J S- tm +LA+es (ti RS) State Water Code, HRS Chapter 174C. • Kuleana lands, water rights, and access rights provided under the Kuleana Act of 1850, as recognized in current statutes, rules, and court decisions. For example, the County must allow construction of a house on kuleana land, regardless of County zoning. • Konohiki and hoa 'aina fishing rights provided under the 1839 Law of Kamemeha, as modified by subsequent legislative acts and court decisions. • Traditional and customary rights of Native Hawaiians, such as for access and gathering, provided under the State Constitution and Hawai'i Revised_Statute-s as interpreted by the courts. HRS, OLYN6 • Burial rights provided under the Hawai'i Historic Preservation Act and the Federal Native American Graves Repatriation Act. Keiki at a May Day celebration X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 199 A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Limit the proliferation of predatory lending establishments through licensing and zoning powers. 2. Expand and preserve affordability in neighborhood centers around the island through zoning, incentives, and development. 3. Provide affordable housing in proximity to community resources and services. 4. Mitigate impact to Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices and the resources they relyuponthrough district boundary amendments and zoning amendments. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Complete a study to establish ratios for different categories of housing for workforce (less than 140 percent of median income), elderly, and disabled. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Develop funding sources to expand, improve, and maintain high - quality transportation, water, parks, broadband, and other infrastructure in underserved neighborhoods. 2. Leverage infrastructure investments to bring jobs and housing opportunties to underserved communities. 3. Increase access and affordability of public transit for youth and other transit - dependent populations. 51 5 Ensure all residents have an opportunity to have a voice in County initiatives by making special efforts to reach low- income people, youth, non - English speaking immigrants, people with criminal records, and other traditionally underserved groups. Establish health and opportunity criteria for prioritizing County programs and policies. 6. Establish community standards for wages and Keiki sporting event at Hanalei Bay, North Shore District 200 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN benefits, ensure fair scheduling, and support 2. ACCESS TO QUALITY worker organizing. EDUCATION AND TRAINING 7. Ensure fair hiring, equal pay, and equitable The policy to nurture our keiki demands promotion opportunities within the County workforce. a strong, comprehensive, and quality education system. A positive educational 8. Reduce barriers to employment and services, such as credit checks and criminal history questions on applications for jobs and housing, in both the private and public sector. eyu.o uY a g e� 9. Target economic development efforts to <g or high- opportunity industries that have potential for growth and to create jobs for people with less than a four -year degree. 3 10. Leverage the County's procurement and contracting to assist minority and female entrepreneurs and triple- bottom -line businesses �c s3 such as social enterprises, cooperatives, and ..B r Corps. 0 2 D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Implement targeted and local hiring practices and invest in pre- apprenticeship training on development and infrastructure projects. 2. Ensure low- income students receive quality public education through strategies including comprehensive, place -based cradle -to- career initiatives. 3. Support reform to school disciplinary policies to keep youth in school and on track to graduate. 4. Partner with Kaua'i Community College for workforce development and training programs and apprenticeships. 5. Foster racially and economically integrated neighborhoods. 6. Require applicants to demonstrate knowledge of Hawaiian land and water laws as a prerequisite for licensing or professional registration with State boards and commissions that license professions relating to transfer of land ownership or land development. These include the Real Estate Commission, Board of Registration for Professional Engineers, Architects, Surveyors, and Landscape Architects. experience encourages children to become lifelong learners who contribute to their communities and the world. Ultimately, education must provide our children, teens, college students, and adults with the knowledge and skills needed to obtain a well - paying job on Kaua'i. 2.1 Increasing Access to Early Education and Care Accessible daycare and preschool is a significant community need. In 2015, there were 27 licensed preschools and 36 licensed family child care homes on Kaua'i. The combined capacity of these facilities is 1,100 children, which contrasts with KauaTs population of approximately 4,400 children under five years old. Most preschools and child care homes have a long waitlist. Exacerbating the demand for preschool is a change in State law which raised the age limit for Kindergarten. 2.2 Providing Quality Education and Facilities from K -12 The Kaua'i District's 14 public schools are administered by the State Department of Education (DOE) which controls budgeting, administration, standards, and curricula. The State DOE began a strategic planning process in 2012. The 2017 -2020 Strategic Plan for the State DOE is focused on making students ready for college, career, and community life. School performance is measured through reports. which X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 201 ti V v ti Table 3 -4 Hawaiian Immersion Charter Schools Name Grades Type Description Location Ke Kula o Niihau K -12 Public Emphasis on perpetuating the language Kekaha Charter and culture of Ni'ihau. Kula Aupuni K -12 Public Emphasis on acquisition of English and Kekaha Ni'ihau a Charter functional skills while sustaining Ni'ihau Kahelelani Aloha language for native speakers. (KANAKA) 'Aha Punana Leo o Pre -K Private Immerses 3 -4 year olds in Hawaiian Puhi Kaua'i language and provides curriculum through a cultural and 'ohana- oriented context. Kawaikini New K -12 Public The school's vision is "a thoughtful, Puhi Century Public Charter knowledgeable -and healthy community Charter School where the language, beliefs,and (NCPCS) practices of the indigenous people of Hawai'i have become instinctive" Kanuikapono K -12 Public Provides programs designed to improve Anahola Charter the educational achievements of youth and families through Hawaiian culture and nature -based programs. consider test results, attendance, safety, and many others. Between 2000 and 2015, Kaua'i public school enrollment declined by 1,400 students - 'making current enrollment far below the projected increase CI in the previous General Plan. Despite this decrease, the State DOE estimates that enrollment will increase from approximately 9,300 in 2015 to 11,500 by 2035. School facilities also serve vital community functions, such as being venues for public meetings, religious services, and events. In many cases they function as public shelters in the event of hurricane and tsunami warnings. 2vCV)+S In addition to public schools, Kaua'i has a number of small but active private and charter schools. Some of these schools are based on religious belief while others provide alternative educational experiences. KauaTs four Hawaiian immersion schools help sustain the Hawaiian language and culture. The County's main role is to coordinate with the State DOE over siting of new schools and to help guide facility expansion in the case of new development. This includes ensuring there are proper and supportive land uses and safe transportation networks adjacent to schools. 202 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 2.3 Improving K -12 Education beyond the Classroom As supported in the State DOE Strategic Plan, schools should serve the community by graduating students who are ready to become positive and contributing community members. This includes reducing bullying and preparing youth for careers. The Keiki to Career Program is a network of 40 community organizations that collaborate to strengthen families, reducing 45 bullying, and assist schools with real -world relevancy, financial literacy training, and career preparation. In addition, more lifelong learning and inter - generational education is needed, particularly for developing stronger and more supportive parenting. 2.4 Supporting the Kaua'i Community College and Increasing Training Opportunities Kaua'i Community College (KCC), part of the University of Hawai'i system, is KauaTs only post- secondary school educational facility and offers several associate degree programs. In addition to academic training, the college provides technical, vocational, and cultural learning programs. Sustainability, agriculture, and science have become a focus of recent programs and initiatives at KCC. IcssONS The college is undertaking a master planning effort learning outdoors to learn about nature and caring to increase student enrollment and guide facility for the land. Older children are made responsible development. for younger ones while younger children are in turn Many community members were concerned that the lack of a university on Kaua'i forces keiki to seek their bachelor's and advanced degrees off - island, which results in a "brain drain" of local talent. At the same time, funding limitations and current enrollment figures are obstacles in moving KCC toward university status. Another impediment to increasing student enrollment is the lack of student housing or dormitories. Given its location in Lihu'e, a major growth area, there is room for the campus to develop and expand needed facilities. Additionally, as more infill development and missing middle housing occurs in Lihu'e, this will increase the range of housing types available to students. To support this, the Future Land Use Map designates the campus area as "University', a new designation in the General Plan designed to facilitate the growth and development of KCC. to +ended 'A'ohe o kahi nana o luna o ka Pali; iho mai a lalo nei; 'ike i ke au nui ke au iki, he alo a he alo. The top of the cliff isn't the place to look at us; given responslbllltles In keeping with their role In the'ohana or society. Learning English and "western concepts" are usually integrated at some level at all schools. For children who are native speakers, there are schools that specialize in improving English skills and the understanding of western concepts in order to increase their success in college and future careers. On Kaua'i,there are several private and public charter schools (pre -K to 12) whose curriculum is rooted in Hawaiian language, culture, and values. Enrollment of Hawaiian language and culture -based schools has steadily grown across the State since the establishment of the very first Hawaiian language school,'Aha Punana Leo on Kaua'i in 1982. Table 3 -4 List Hawaiian Immersion Charter Schools on Kaua'i. As the schools grow and graduate more speakers of Hawaiian language and students of Hawaiian culture, it will be important to continue support of integration of language and culture in all aspects of community, in order to perpetuate the identity of Kaua'i and support communities and jobststemmed in;this knowledge base. �.}�w mivx9 -IFrom come down here and learn of the big and little current, face to face. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 2.5 Supporting the Language, Culture, and Knowledge of Kaua'i The number of public charter schools in Hawai'i is growing as parents look for alternatives to public school curriculums. Charter schools are smaller in size, provide for multiple -grade level integration, multiple - discipline projects, and place -based learning. Manyarefocused onthe Hawaiian language and culture. It is said that understanding the language of a place allows one to see life through the eyes of its original people. In this context, schools that focus on the Hawaiian language and culture provide children with a wayof understanding and interacting withtheworld and people around them in the same way ancestors of our island were able to. It is typical for Hawaiian language -based schools to include the learning of moon phases and agriculture as part of science and math education. Field trips take classroom For large residential projects and in new communities, ensure the development of adequate school facilities, either at existing schools or at new school sites. 2. Have developers pay their share of all costs needed to provide adequate school facilities for the children anticipated to live in their development. 3. Support the use, expansion, and development of family childcare homes, preschools, and charter schools. X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 203 V/ B. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and road safety improvements around and adjacent to schools. 2. Prioritize the development and improvement of play areas or tot lots for small children in areas with high concentrations of family care homes, such as L-ihu'e and Kapa'a. C. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Treat schools as community resources for learning about specialized environmental, cultural, and historic subjects pertinent to Kaua'i. 2. Support community use of schools during non - school hours, such as recreational centers, meeting facilities, and emergency shelters. 3. COMMUNITY HEALTH'` Community health is improved when the built environment supports active lifestyles and when people have access to the resources and information they need to make healthy choices and manage their health. 3. Design school facilities to facilitate community 3.1 Improving Community Health through use during non - school hours. Planning and Collaboration 4. Retrofit existing facilities and design and construct new schools to serve as hurricane shelters. 5. Support the Keiki to Career Kaua'i programs and activities. 6. Continue and expand the Safe Routes to School program to encourage healthy, safe, and active living. 7. Support increased enrollment at the Kaua'i Community College and the development of supportive housing and facilities for student, staff; and faculty at the Puhi campus. 8. Support both public and private educational programs that emphasize the Hawaiian language and Native Hawaiian culture, science, and practices. 204 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN A healthy and resilient people is one of the General Plan's overarching goals. While Hawai'i typically ranks high in national health surveys, Kaua'i faces serious public health issues.- For example, the rates of obesity, teen births, suicide, and motor vehicle crashes are either increasing or above the State average.,, Moreover, these impacts are inequitably distributed across KauaTs diverse racial and ethnic groups. On Kaua'i, the lead public health agency is the Kaua'i District Health Office of the State Department of Health. Its role includes chronic disease management and control, communicable disease control, developmental disabilities, environmental health, and family health services. However, on Kaua'i and throughout the world, traditional concepts of public health have evolved to bring new partners to the table. Given the importance of the physical environment and social determinants on health, a new approach called "Health In All Policies" (HIAP) seeks to integrate health and equity considerations into policy and systems. For example, a growing body of scientific evidence has correlated the design of the built environment with public health outcomes.52 It is now a best practice in planning to support land use and community design strategies which encourage physical activity and reduce automobile dependency. On Kaua'i, the 50 Gallup - Healthways, 2017 51 Kaua'i Community Health Needs Assessment, 2013 52 CDC Task Force on Community Preventative Services, 2004 v State's Physical Activity and Nutrition Plan (2009) has brought planners, public health professionals, and J ? community members together to develop active living strategies through Get Fit Kaua'i, -'the Healthy Eating, Active Living (HEAL) Community Coalition of V, �J Housing, Shared Spaces, and Opportunity and Health for All sectors. 3.2 Improving Access to Health Care and Preventative Services Kaua'i County. Access to health care means ensuring all of KauaTs residents, even in rural areas, have convenient Ua ola loko i ke aloha access to health clinics, acute care, and emergency Love gives life within. services. Kaua'i is currently served by three hospitals: (Love is imperative to one's mental Wilcox Medical Center in Lihu'e, Samuel Mahelona and physical welfare.) ? Memorial Hospital in Kapa'a, and the Kaua'i Veterans s Memorial Hospital in Waimea. All three facilities The work of promoting active community design i provide 24-hour emergency care. The facilities at has been reinforced through the Kaua'i Community Wilcox are privately run, while the Hawaii Health Health Improvement Initiative ( KCHII) (2013),which Systems Corporation manages the other facilities. established a health improvement framework for The North Shore will be served by an urgent care Kaua'i. The KCHII utilizes the ahupua'a model to clinic that is currently under construction. recognize that the "upstream" and "midstream" Preventative care is another facet of overall wellness. Q influences of health include socioeconomic � built Many chronic diseases can be prevented through conditions, health care, and the environment. � The five priority themes include community design upstream interventions including screening, early and planning; housing; health and wellness; medical detection, and management of diseases such as y care; and education and lifelong learning. These breast cancer, cervical cancer, diabetes, elevated themes informed the objectives and actions of the cholesterol, hypertension, colorectal cancer, and HIV. Access to health is reproductive services another 0 A Kaua'i Surfer X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL 13.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 205 need given the higher than average teen pregnancy rate and a high unintended pregnancy rate among the general population. 3.3 Advancing Native Hawaiian Health Equity Native Hawaiian health has been a long- standing equity issue in Hawaii. Recorded health disparities led to the enactment of the Native Hawaiian Health Care Act of 1988 which established Papa Ola Lokahi in Hawai'i, including Ho'ola Lahui Hawai'i, which is KauaTs Native Hawaiian Health System. One of their programs, Malama I Na Pua Program, raises health awareness among Native Hawaiian youth who attend a Hawaiian Language Charter School. In 2013, continued health equity concerns led the State Legislature to establish a Native Hawaiian Health Task Force to improve the health of Native Hawaiians. The work of the task force will also impact other Pacific Islanders and the community as a whole. "o U 3.4 Addressing Substance Abuse TC he Life Choices Agency was created in 2003 to deal with KauaTs substance abuse issues. Since then, headway has been made in certain areas. For example, the number of drug - related offenses by adults has dropped from 290 in 2010 to 58 in 2014.53 However, many community members feel the increasing use of meth and other serious drugs is a top community issue, especially for youth. The s 2015 -2020 Kauai Drug Response Plan calls for I a a continuum of on— island treatment facilities and services. For example, the County has a need for a o residential treatment facility. It is expensive to send those in need to O'ahu, especially as treatment is often a lengthy process. An adolescent treatment and healing center is being planned for Kaua'i that would provide residential substance abuse treatment and healing services. 3.5 Anticipating Future Threats to Community Health In 2015, a legislative report acknowledged that climate change will intensify existing and cause new health threats, including acute and chronic disease, stress and mental health issues, and dengue and other vector disease S.14 These impacts Twill more heavily fall on vulnerable populations, including the elderly and households experiencing poverty. Jey►9ue, fever 53 2015 -2020 Kauai Drug Response Plan 54 Climate Change and Health Working Group Report, 2015 206 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN The following actions are comprehensive in nature and address broad community health needs. A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Provide access to frequent and convenient public transit near major job centers and health care facilities. 2. Ensure community design supports healthy and active lifestyles. 3. Consider zoning options that limit new fast food restaurants close to schools, daycare centers, or parks. 4. Support the built environment and land use recommendations provided by the Native Hawaiian Health Task Force and similar community health initiatives. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Include community health concerns in Community Planning. 2. Implement and update the Kaua'i Community Drug Response Plan. 3. Implement and update the Kauai Plan on Aging. 4. Implement and update the Kauai Community Health Improvement Initiative. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Prioritize sidewalk and bus stop improvements for accessibility near major health care facilities and group homes. 2. Improve the connectivity of essential services, including emergency response. 3. Ensure that low- income neighborhoods have high - quality parks, playgrounds, and green spaces. 4. Leverage Federal resources such as community development block grants and neighborhood - focused programs to create opportunity -rich neighborhoods. 5. Adopt policies for smoke -free beaches, parks, condos, and cars with keiki. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS Implement and update the State Physical Activity and Nutrition Plan. 2. Support pilot programs for community gardens and nutrition education programs. 3. Provide anti - tobacco education in schools. 4. Increase access to programs that provide reproductive health and family planning education and services. 5. Support programs to increase participation in vaccination, disease screening, and early detection and management of chronic disease, such as the "Better Choices, Better Health" Program. 6. Support healthy food options in underserved communities by: a. Increasing the visibility of healthy food in stores, particularly those that accept Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) and electronic benefit transfer (EBT) purchases. b. Allowing the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits at farmers markets. c. Encouraging fast -food restaurants to offer healthy options and improve labeling. d. Increasing access to nutritional counseling. e. Taxing sugar- sweetened beverages. f. Eliminating the General Excise Tax on purchases of fresh fruits and vegetables. Support programs that improve KauaTs ability to respond to and recover from public health threats such as infectious disease and mosquito - borne disease outbreaks. 8. Anticipate and plan for the health impacts of climate change. 9. Increase access to mental health services and the availability of mental health providers. 10. Support the Malama I Na Pua health and wellness program for Native Hawaiian youth. 4. ACCESS TO RECREATION AND SUBSISTENCE ACTIVITIES Some of Kaua'i's most unique and treasured areas are either located on or accessed through privately owned property. Access to these areas for both recreational and cultural purposes, including subsistence activities, is important to the community. At the same time, access should be balanced with education and stewardship. The State and County regulatory system protects and creates public access through the subdivision, shoreline setback, and SMA laws. However, many feel access is greatly restricted and declining in certain areas through limited parking, lack of signage, no 7� maintenance, and inconsistent enforcement E Cthe effects of which are compounded by � increased resident and visitor use. There is also concern regarding restricted vehicular and pedestrian access to the shoreline and other z places locked by privately owned land, such as waterfalls. 4.1 Improving Access to the Shoreline By law, the shoreline is accessible and held in trust forthe benefit of the public. State law protects lateral shoreline access, which is also referred to as a public beach transit corridor that exists seaward of the shoreline. Shoreline vegetation, when unmaintained or manipulated by private landowners, can restrict lateral access. Access concerns are also compounded by beach narrowing from erosion, whose rates are anticipated to increase as sea level rise occurs. Additionally, another concern was the lack of signed public accessways to the shoreline (versus access along the shoreline) and inadequate parking at popular access points. In some cases, public access X. OPPORTUNITY AND HEALTH FOR ALL 1 3.0 ACTIONS BY SECTOR 207 U.S. 1)e-PaY +wzn+ of l40kYL.214kV%J SeCUri+/ is not allowed or desirable due to environmental, rights, such as gathering rights on the shoreline and public safety, and other concerns. On the beach upon land. near and adjacent to PMRF, national and homeland 4.3 Increasing Access to Privately Owned security:laws preempt State laws and public access is Recreational Space restricted. However, the overall need is for increased and improved public access to the shoreline. There are many valued recreational, cultural, and 4.2 Protecting Native Hawaiian Access scenic resourcesthat are privately owned or accessed through private property. Privately held recreational Rights Rig space include waterfalls and undeveloped coastal Protecting access for Native Hawaiian traditional and areas including Kipu Kai and Maha'ulepu. Such areas customary gathering practices is guaranteed in the are used for hiking, hunting, gathering, swimming, Hawai'i State Constitution. In addition to protecting :and other reasons. These areas also include wahi development and private property interests, agency pana, such as k,heiau8 and known burial sites. decisions must make specific findings related to the Unfortunately, the trend is toward lessening public identification of traditional and customary practices access to these areas due to liability concerns, desire C in existence on land proposed for development and for privacy, and other reasons. For example, many �,i potential impacts of any proposed development. waterfalls that were previously popular swimming Decisions should include actions to reasonably holes are now closed, including Kilauea, Kipu, and L protect cultural rights to the extentfeasible. Case law, Ho'opi'i Falls. When such resources become popular, including the Pele Defense Fund v. Paty case; Public. especially with the rise of social media, they are Access .Shoreline .Hawai'j, also known as PAS H; and vulnerable to overuse, vandalism, and littering, as the Ka- Pa'akai O Ka'Aina cases reaffirm the State's well as increased risks of user injury and death. These tiduty to protect access to traditional and customary concerns often spur private landowners to restrict 0 Miloli'i Ridge Trail, Waimea - Kekaha District 208 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN J 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING 4.1 IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN The General Plan is the foundation for planning in Kaua'i County and functions within a system established by State and County law. While the Plan sets policy, actual implementation is a complex and lengthy process Which occurs through a broad range of actions and decisions. For example, all future development and planning approvals must be consistent with the General Plan. Other planning instruments include ordinances, community plans, and capital programs. Throughout the public process, many raised comments concerning the island's current state compared to the visions and goals set forth in the 2000 General Plan. Further, those intimately familiar with the last General Plan commented on its inability to allow for robust monitoring and feedback as a means of implementing recommendations. Many shortcomings raised by community members arose largely in the context of questioning why good elements laid out in the previous general plan were never fulfilled. In an attempt to compensate for the need to see progress, many suggested the adoption of specific numerical benchmarks to gauge whether an objective was attained. For example, in the area of agriculture, some raised whether the plan should require a fixed percentage of food be grown and consumed on- island. Qh- i s1 aha �Iy CA� 4 Thedifficultywith creating and adopting guideposts�as these is three - fold:' 1) each statistical benchmark may not reflect the reality in its ability to be implemented given the twenty -year planning horizon in this plar ) 2) agencies may neither have the resources nor the method to easily glean the information necessary to 4 accurately monitor a prescribed benchmark, ancL ,o 3) the benchmarks may distract from the overall big picture on what future state the community wishes to attain and instead create points of fixation lending to i myopic and disjointed decision making. W Beyond the difficulties '-monitoring brightline benchmarks, attaining goals remains a function of political and economic realities locally and globally. For example, Kaua'i, like other counties in Hawai'i, faces mounting fiscal constraints resulting from worldwide economic changes and the continued reduction in Federal funding for infrastructure and other programs like earmarks. 4.1 IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN 14.0 IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING 213 KauaTs small tax base compared to its land mass and long distances between communities make providing public services and infrastructure expensive. However, the expectations for quality public facilities and infrastructure remain high. Although suggested actions for implementation spanned all sectors, their aggregate costs well exceed the community's ability to either directly pay for such implementation or receive external funds as adequate support. E kaupe aku no I ka hoe a ko mai Put forward the paddle and draw it back (Go on with the task that is started and finish it). Rather than lock in a rigid means of monitoring whether success remains apparent, a more dynamic means of building a sound set of results -based activities for the General Plan is necessary. A common model for evaluating future acts by the public and private sector would more easily allow for an overall turn in the directions the community desires through these incremental changes in our society. Given the stated vision and goals, policies, and actions by sector, this Plan's ideal future state for the v) island achieves many of the community's objectives Iby directing growth to existing centers. For example, a implementation would gauge whether strong linkages are apparent between the General Plan and Z capital improvement investments either by project, ;3 or as a program. The evaluation model would allow decision "makers; the ability to prioritize actions and direct resources toward those most integral in furthering the plan's vision. Finally, shared responsibility and accountability for implementation are imperative to staying focused and to making measurable progress. This Chapter discusses approaches and methods available for monitoring and evaluating implementation of the Plan's objectives while providing a framework for keeping all community members abreast of how their community is changing in real time. 214 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 4.1.1 TOOLS FOR IMPLEMENTATION There are several major vehicles through which the plan will be implemented, following the General Plan's adoption: 1. Code Changes 2. Permit Review and Approval Process I Community Plans 4. Functional Plans Srv�provevneni-s 5. Capital Lmproverf-im Program v 6. Departmental Structure and Programs 7. Partner and Developer Contributions Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Maps, and Development Codes The County regulatory system is the most direct method toward attaining many objectives laid out in the plan. The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO), Zoning Maps, and other development codes will require updating following this plan's adoption for consistency and adjustment with the new vision for the island. Active development of these amendments is a necessary step toward goal attainment, and should be evaluated in the broader context of the ideal future state, while keeping in mind the details necessary to avoid conflicting regulations and loopholes. Permit Review and Approval Process The other direct approach toward attaining the Plan's goals', lay in the approval of permits. The General Plan policies and policy maps provide a basis for evaluating a development proposal for its conformance with the County's vision and desired direction. Deference should be given toward r' remaining consistent with the big picture envisioned by this document rather than making expedient or convenient decisions based upon areas of gray or conflicting action statements that will inevitably arise over time. _ t; Community Plans The Community Planning process for each planning district must be carried out in collaboration with community groups and committees on a regular basis. Home rule empowerment is necessary to galvanize community buy -in on this Plan and build upon each district's role in the overall island wide vision. islandwici.�... Functional Plans Functional Plans for infrastructure systems and facilities, parks, and housing need updating to guide public investment in support of the General Plan vision and policies. Capital Improvements Program and Appropriations The County's six -year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) can help guide the incremental investment consistent with the goals set forth in this plan. The CIP update process should include a review and incorporation of General Plan actions, particularly those identified as short term priorities, to ensure the County is making progress on its priority actions. Further, appropriations should also be evaluated in the context of what the community sees as the ideal future state. Departmental Structure and Programs Implementation and monitoring of the Plan must be supported by the structure and programs of County agencies. Parties responsible for implementing actions, as well as monitoring, reporting, and updating the plan are clearly identified. Partnerships & Developer Contributions Public- private partnerships and developer contributions contribute significantly to funding County facilities and infrastructure improvements. With the exception of standardized water and sewer facility charges, the contributions required of developers tend to be adopted ad hoc in association with specific zone change applications. The 2000 General Plan called for the County to standardize these transactions, make them more predictable, and explore other applications for public - private partnerships. That recommendation is carried forward in this General Plan. Vehicles for such partnerships could also include Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), improvement districts, community facility districts, and impact fees. 4.1.2 KEY IMPLEMENTATION AGENCIES Adoption of the General Plan is the first step in an implementation process involving multiple partners at both the government and community levels. Although the Planning Department facilitates implementation among agencies and departments, administrative decisions are vested with the Office of the Mayorand legislative authority lieswith the County Council. The roles of key officials and government agencies in General Plan implementation are summarized below, while responsibility for specific actions are shown in the Action Matrix (Appendix G). Mayor The Mayor isthe chief executive officer of the County and exercises direct supervision overall departments. The Mayor appoints the County's managing director to oversee administrative functioning of the County. County Council The County Council is the legislative body of the County and is therefore responsible for adoption of the General Plan, including all plan amendments. The Council also adopts the zoning, subdivision, and -I- development plan ordinances which comprise the d N County's development code. The Council approves the annual Capital Improvement Program budget for each fiscal year. Planning Commission The Planning Commission reviews and makes recommendations to the County Council on amendments or updates to the General Plan. The Commission also provides recommendations on development and land use approvals, including amendments to the zoning and subdivision ordinances. Department of Planning, Plahh;hg Dr_�+met„+ . Specific duties related to Plan implementation include preparing zoning and subdivision ordinance amendments for Planning Commission and County Council approval, reviewing development applications, and making reports and studies on planning issues. The Department also prepares Community Plans to provide detailed direction and standards on land use, urban design, transportation, and other physical planning concerns. The Department will have primary responsibility for monitoring and reporting on General Plan progress. 4.1 IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN 14.0 IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING 215 The Department provides administrative support h to the Planning Commission, Historic Preservation �zs Commission, and Open Space Commission. .S o State Land Use Commission �a The Land Use Commission administersthe State Land Use La W52 in which all lands in Hawa'i =i are classified into one of four land use districts: Rural, Agriculture, Urban, and Conservation. The Commission has the o authorityto establish district boundaries and ensures that areas of State concern are addressed and considered in the land use decision - making process. Other important agencies whose work will be guided by the General Plan Update include: • Department of Public Works • Department of Parks and Recreation • Housing Agency • Transportation Agency • Office of Economic Development • Emergency Management Agency Key utility service providers include: • Department of Water • Kaua'i Island Utility^ add: Cooeer- CL +ive KIUC) Key partners on the State level include: • Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism • Office of Planning • Department of Land and Natural Resources • Department of Health • Department of Education • Department of Transportation • Department of Hawaiian Home Lands 52 Chapter 205, Hawai'i Revised Statutes 216 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Fi 492 MONITORING PROGRESS A comprehensive and transparent effort/to monitor 3 the implementation and effectiveness of the 'x General Plan will occur every two years and will include.1) performance measure reporting, for both q the vision and the 19 policies, and, ,2) tracking of �o- action implementation (see Action Matrix,p,ppendix G'and Figure 4 -1). A "Kakou Committee" will be a established to guide this process. More frequent reporting on performance measures and action implementation will be facilitated through an online dashboard that provides updated information as it becomes available. 4.2.1 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance measures can be used to track the progress toward achieving the 2035 Vision for Kaua'i. The General Plan introduces performance measurement into the planning system. During the public process, participants desired greater accountability for the actions identified in the General Plan. Attempts to audit the 2000 General Plan were frustrated by the lack of regular reporting and evaluation in the past. To correct this situation, a reporting and evaluation framework is established based on performance measures and a biannual committee -based evaluation process. The performance measures, introduced in Table 4 -1, are tied to the sector objectives. The draft measures were selected in part based on the accessibility of consistent baseline data. It is possible that future efforts will refine the performance measures or establish benchmarks. Strategic goals and targets set through partner initiatives, such as Aloha+ Challenge, can be integrated into the reporting system. Under the framework, formal reports will occur on an annual basis to the Planning Commission and County Council. The report may include recommendations for improvement in the framework, alternative measures, and /or new actions. �1 v u r r s 0 W 0 Table 4 -1 General Plan Objectives and Draft Performance Measures 4.2 MONITORING PROGRESS 1 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING 217 Draft Measures Objective (* indicates the measure aligns with the Aloha+ Challenge Measures) 1. To accommodate and support KauaTs projected population growth and Conformance with population housing needs. allocations 2. To meet future housing needs through 'missing middle" housing types Building type of new that are affordable by design. residential units 3. To protect rural character by ensuring new growth designed to be compact Consistency with the Future and focused around existing town cores. Land Use Map 4. To manage land use and development in a manner that respects the Development under Special unique character of a place. Planning Areas 5. To locate residential growth in and near jobs centers. Housing units within 12 mile of major jobs centers Reduction in average commute time 6. To increase overall community health through design that supports Non - commute mode share safe and accessible parks, streets, and other shared spaces. 7. To encourage the development of Lihu'e as KauaTs primary urban Development within Urban center within an urban edge boundary. Edge Boundary 8. To increase resiliency by limiting new development in areas impacted by Development in flood future sea level rise. zone /sea level rise impacted areas 9. To conserve the upper watershed and restore native habitat and Acres of Native Watershed forested areas. under high level protection* 10. To protect, restore, and enhance freshwater resources to support Increase in fresh water aquatic, environmental, and cultural resources. capacity by 100 mgd* 11. To preserve and protect sandy beaches and public access to the Health of reefs shoreline. 12. To protect the flora and fauna unique to Kaua'i and Hawai'i and to Manage Federally listed mitigate the impact of invasive species. threatened and endangered species* 13. To increase housing opportunities for low- to moderate - income New affordable housing units households. 14. To support mixed use, higher density, and walkable development in New Housing Units in existing towns. Neighborhood General and Neighborhood Center 15. To develop compact, walkable communities consistent with the Future Entitled projects consistent Land Use Map. with Future Land Use Map 16. To expand housing opportunities for workers on farms. New farm worker housing units 4.2 MONITORING PROGRESS 1 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING 217 IUOTE : add col L,4 Mk1 +i +Ies 17. To support the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands in their mission to New lots awarded in DHHL provide housing to their beneficiaries. communities 18. To accommodate the needs of an aging population through age- New elderly housing units or friendly community design and assisted living facilities. assisted living facilities 19. To reduce KauaTs population of those houseless and at risk for Houseless population houselessness. ddd : wtio arF- 20. To reduce the impact of resort uses on communities outside the Visitor Attrition of nonconforming Destination Area. use 21. To safely and efficiently move people and goods with a choice of Mode shift in overall trips transportation options. 22. To provide a safe and accessible County road network that supports New roads or retrofits the Future Land Use Map. designed to be context sensitive Crashes with fatalities 23. To enhance the viability of transit as a transportation choice for Transit ridership residents and visitors. 24. To create connected and safe bicycle networks that accommodate all Miles of bicycle facilities riders. Bicycle crashes 25. To provide connected and safe pedestrian facilities in communities. Miles of pedestrian facilities Crashes involving pedestrians 26. To implement efficient parking strategies that support community Parking audits or strategies needs. implemented 27. To ensure water infrastructure is planned to accommodate domestic Water improvements in needs and protect the public trust. Urban Center, Neighborhood General, and Neighborhood Center designations 28. To mitigate the impact to KauaTs fresh and ocean waters from Number of cesspools wastewater. 29. To provide environmentally -sound waste disposal and collection Tons recycled* services. 30. To support the modernization and user - friendliness of KauaTs airports Capital expenditures for and harbors. Kaua'i's airports and harbors 31. To develop town centers as attractive places to work, live, and play. Zoning and use permit applications in the Neighborhood Center designation 32. To provide a variety of quality and accessible parks and recreational Percentage of households facilities. within walking distance of park with facilities 33. To expand and improve access to KauaTs shared -use paths and trails. Miles of shared use paths and trails 218 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN NOTE: Add co(L4mYN 4i +I-es 34. To improve the resident and visitor experience at KauaTs State Parks. Capital expenditures for State Parks 35. To focus new resort development in areas designated for visitor use. Visitor Unit Inventory 36. To ensure the long -term viability and productivity of agricultural lands. Agricultural employment 37. To promote opportunities for small business and emerging economic Number of small businesses sectors to thrive. CEDS programs implemented 38. To preserve and enhance historic buildings, structures, and places. Places recognized on Federal or national registry 39. To recognize and protect the resources and places important to Kaua'i's Stewardship agreements history and people. 40. To preserve important landmarks and protect scenic resources. Number of scenic resources identified through community plans 41. To increase energy self - sufficiency and maintain a reliable, resilient, and Increase in renewable cost - efficient energy system. energy* 42. To acknowledge the human contribution to global warming and Decrese in emissions* reduce KauaTs greenhouse gas emissions. 43. To ensure adequate coverage of public safety and emergency services Deaths due to drowning and as Kaua'i grows. other hazards 44. To ensure that Kaua'i is prepared for natural disasters and other Number of residents trained emergencies. under the Community Emergency Response Team Program 45. To prepare for the impacts of climate change on the natural and built Percentage of areas impacted environments. by sea level rise that is undeveloped 46. To recognize and address inequities in health and well -being among Decrease in inequity between KauaTs diverse ethnic, racial, and income groups. racial groups 47. To support educational programs that foster cultural knowledge, Kaua'i Community College employability, and civic participation of local residents. enrollment 48. To encourage healthy lifestyles and accessible health care. Obesity rate 49. To actively protect and increase access to the places where recreational Identified and signed _access= and subsistence activity occurs. wayJ r.7ccesswr� 4.2 MONITORING PROGRESS 14.0 IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING 219 V 4.2.2 COMMUNITY EDUCATION & CAPACITY BUILDING Monitoring of action implementation is facilitated through the Action Matrix (Appendix G), which identifies lead agencies and partners. To ensure transparency and stakeholder participation, a Kakou Committee will be established to conduct a bi- annual review of the progress made. The Kakou Committee will include public and private partners with a stake in plan implementation, and will be appointed by the Mayor. In addition to implementation evaluation, the Committee will also review the performance measures. The final report will be presented to the Planning Commission and forwarded to the County Council. The release of the report will be accompanied by the public outreach and open house events to keep the community informed and engaged in the General Plan. NOTE: remove, 4.2.3 UPDATING THE GENERAL PLAN The Kaua'i County Code requires the County Planning Department to conduct a comprehensive review and update of the General Plan Update every ten years. In practice, that does not always happen, and even if it did, ten years is a long time when information and conditions are constantly changing. This plan aspires to be adaptable and responsive by building in a bi- annual review and reporting process that allows the County to take stock and keep a record of its progress, evaluate,what's working and what'§ not, and consider how to change course or incorporate the best available information.'The policies, actions, and Land Use Map may be updated in response to unexpected trends or new information. In this way, the General Plan can be a "living document". wln oc+ is Figure 4 -1 Implementation and Feedback Loop N��,,txviON and FEE,,, cot: 220 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Sol OVERVIEW The General Plan policy maps are spatial representations of existing and envisioned land uses, resources, and facilities across the island. The maps show the locations of existing resources, constraints, and development. They also identify areas which may be appropriate for future development. The maps were developed to be consistent with General Plan policies. They are intended to be utilized and cross - referenced against one another when considering future land use proposals or policies. The 2000 General Plan contained two sets of policy maps (Land Use and Heritage Resources). This General Plan includes six sets of policy maps: • Future Land Use (Section 5.2) Heritage Resources (Section 5.3) • Hazards (Section 5.4) • Infrastructure (Section 5.5) • Public Facilities (Section 5.6) • Transportation (Section 5.7) Each set of policy maps includes a set of seven maps: An island -wide map and a large scale map for each of the six planning districts. Transportation is an exception with two maps: one showing transit and another showing roadways and paths. The role and function of each map is described at the beginning of the sections. 5.1 OVERVIEW 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 223 5.2 FUTURE LAND USE MAPS The General Plan Land Use Maps include an island map at 1 inch = 4 miles scale and six district maps at 1 inch = 1, 2, or 3 miles scale. These maps are intended to document desired land use patterns, to distinguish areas appropriate for future development, and to identify those areas which are to be preserved. Purpose of the Land Use Maps: • To identify existing developed areas and lands appropriate for future development. • To identify areas that should be retained in a natural or undeveloped state. • To identify areas designated as "Natural" and zoned in order to protect steep slopes and streams from erosion and from development • To guide preparation of Community Plans to prepare or revise land use ordinances and rules, including but not limited to the following: revisions to the Comprehensive 4 !I NOTE : ch0.r,90 I- 4� Zoning Ordinance or the Zoning Maps;, zone change ordinances; revisions to the Special Management Area (SMA) rules or boundaries revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance; anc the preparation of new ordinances or rules. • To be consulted when projects are undertaken with State or County lands or funds. • To serve as a guide in the review of subdivision and land use permit applications. General Plan Land Use Maps alone may not be used to prohibit a land use that is allowed by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or by permit. Aerial view of Wailua, East Kaua'i District 224 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 0 �£v �o U ti Z i' ifD CL m i d N 9 C A / - Q »n�ibM re _ c 1 r i` ri Z�/y' toy 6 10 O n N 4 L CD Z � Ci Y N MN 6 t Y 8 a w 0 a M C J o,-Owo N A S a o Ln y E c° _ IL � LAP a° c m a �o n /z ^ v c i~ n I� � o i c N a i u 8 0 4 Q Q LL 17Yl�N�M O�b�bW a a d N M V C J d 7 i N N M LL - � K 2 tl N 6 S Y Y 0 6 O 4 Q f Z Q 7 -o,bolow O O c J 2 /l v a' OU d �O a av m a Y bn !b/vA M A 'Z = r r. N K _ J _ p L hK E of Z mo j �V mh V- j aN a . o = c a� m �o v w, al �+ a o U U _ E ti 2-d rom M's Z Lh CL .�2 z z" d e N L L O M Q W O Z Q z F N 5.3 HERITAGE RESOURCE MAPS The General Plan's set of Heritage Resources Maps purposes of the Heritage Resource includes an island map and six district maps at a larger scale. These maps document important Maps natural, scenic, and historic features, particularly in q The purposes of the Heritage Resource Maps are: relation to the urban and agricultural lands wfiic� f . To depict natural, cultural, and scenic are developed or may be developed in the future, resources that are important to the County of including: Kaua'i and that are intended to be conserved • Registered Historic Sites (State /Federal) • Cultural Features • Priority Public Access Points • Fishponds • Streams & Waterbodies • Wetlands • Major Roads • Planning District Boundaries • Traditional Cultivation Areas • Ahupua'a Boundaries • Coral Reefs • Scenic Corridors • State & County Parks • Preserves • Reservoirs • Regulated Fishing Areas • Open Space Acquisition Priorities • Sand Dunes • Threatened & Endangered Species • Critical Habitat The mapping of important landforms, streams, and other physical elements represents the general location of the resource. The mapping of historic and archaeological sites, other features, and Scenic Roadway Corridors is intended to be representational, not precise. • To classify important landforms that shall be designated as "Natural" on the General Plan Land Use Map and shall be zoned accordingly, in order to protect steep slopes and streams from erosion and to protect landforms from development that might affect scenic views. • To be a guide when preparing Community Plans and in preparing or revising land use ordinances and rules, including but not limited to the following: revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or the 6 Zoning Maps'; zone change ordinances;;` s revisions to the Special Management Area (SMA) rules or boundaries; revisions to the W Subdivision Ordinance; and; the preparation 0 of new ordinances or rules, such as a Scenic 7 Roadway Corridor ordinance. ", NDTE: remcfe coyny nq • To be a reference for projects undertaken with State or County lands or funds shall be designed to conserve heritage resources. • To guide in the review of subdivision and land use permit applications, but may not be used alone to prohibit a land use that is allowed by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or by permit. 5.3 HERITAGE RESOURCE MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 239 ✓✓ Miles I I I Figure 5 -8 Kaua'i Island Heritage Resource Map o 2.5 5 iD Registered Historic Sites ■ State ■ National ■ State & National • Cultural Features 0 Priority Public Access Points ♦ Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies — Major Roads Roads 240 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN -- Historic Belt Road Trails Koloa Scenic Byway Planning District Boundary C! Ahupua'a Boundaries Wetlands Coral Reefs Regulated Fishing Areas State & County Parks D Preserves Reservoirs rS2 Traditional Cultivation Areas Sand Dunes Open Space Acquisition Priorities M Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species High Density Very High Density 6 5 Figure 5 -10 Hanape - 'pe Ele'ele Heritage Resource Map Registered Historic Sites ■ State ■ National ■ State & National • Cultural Features o Priority Public Access Points ♦ Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies — Major Roads Roads 242 KAUA`1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Trails Planning District Boundary O Ahupua`a Boundaries Wetlands D Coral Reefs Regulated Fishing Areas State & County Parks Q Preserves M Reservoirs � Traditional Cultivation Areas Sand Dunes Open Space Acquisition Priorities Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species 0 High Density Very High Density = 1 miles NORTH 3 Po'ipu Beach Park Figure 5 -11 South Kaua'i Heritage Resource Map 1 in = 2 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.75 1.5 3 Registered Historic Sites Koloa Scenic Byway Reservoirs ■ State Trails D Traditional Cultivation Areas ■ National Planning District Boundary M Sand Dunes ■ State &National O Ahupua'a Boundaries Open Space Acquisition Priorities • Cultural Features Wetlands � Critical Habitat o Priority Public Access Points I Coral Reefs Threatened & Endangered Species ♦ Fish Ponds Regulated Fishing Areas D High Density Streams & Waterbodies � State &County Parks Very High Density — Major Roads O Preserves Roads 5.3 HERITAGE RESOURCE MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 243 G 6 Ip Ll I? Figure 5 -12 Uhu'e Heritage Resource Map Registered Historic Sites ® State ■ National ■ State & National • Cultural Features o Priority Public Access Points ♦ Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies — Major Roads Roads 244 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Trails Planning District Boundary Ahupua'a Boundaries Wetlands D Coral Reefs M Regulated Fishing Areas State & County Parks (� Preserves M Reservoirs \ NOTE: Mpair 84461 Traditional Cultivation Areas Sand Dunes Open Space Acquisition Priorities Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species ® High Density ® Very High Density in rno-p Fi Registered Historic Sites ® State ® National ■ State & National • Cultural Features o Priority Public Access Points ♦ Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies — Major Roads Roads Trails _= Planning District Boundai D Ahupua'a Boundaries Wetlands D Coral Reefs Regulated Fishing Areas State & County Parks D Preserves M Reservoirs © Traditional Cultivation Areas i Sand Dunes i Open Space Acquisition Priorities Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species High Density Very High Density 5.3 HERITAGE RESOURCE MAPS ' 5.0 POLICY MAPS 245 Figure 5 -14 North Shore Heritage Resource Map Registered Historic Sites El State o National ® State & National • Cultural Features o Priority Public Access Points ♦ Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies — Major Roads Roads 246 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Historic Belt Road Trails Planning District Boundary O Ahupua'a Boundaries Wetlands D Coral Reefs ! Regulated Fishing Areas ! State & County Parks D Preserves Miles I I J I 0 1.75 3.5 7 ! Reservoirs Traditional Cultivation Areas ! Sand Dunes ! Open Space Acquisition Priorities ! Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species High Density Very High Density 1d d 3 j1 t t S94 HAZARD MAPS Hazard Maps have been included in this General Plan to support the goals and policies relating v to increasing resilience. The maps identify areas ,'_4 across the island that may be vulnerable to natural F hazards including flooding, wildfire, and tsunam-i. s 3 They also identify the locations of critical facilities. The Hazard Maps, like the Heritage Resource Maps, are intended to be used as a planning tool to guide responsible decision - making about future land use and capital investments. The Hazard Maps should be periodically reviewed and updated as additional data becomes available. The Extreme Tsunami Zone was added to the maps to show how such an event might affect the island; however, its intended use is specifically for hazard evacuation planning. As such, it was not used to inform changes to the Land Use Maps. Maps depicting potential 1 -foot and 3 -foot sea level rise scenarios for select locations on the island are included in Appendix D. The Hazard Maps show: • Dams • Emergency Shelters • Critical Facilities • Major Roads • Tsunami Evacuation Zones • Extreme Tsunami Zones • Streams • Wildfire Risk Rating • Flood Zones Purposes of the Hazard Maps The purposes of the Hazard Maps are as follows: • The Hazard Maps depict areas known to be S(�� ✓ vulnerable to natural hazards including flood, U) wildfire, and tsunami. These risk areas have ✓✓ y been mapped using existing data sources and depict general locations that are intended to be representational, not precise.' i-sL4met nis The Hazard Map shall be used as a planning tool to identify existing developed areas that may need further analysis or protection. They can also help guide land use decisions that situate future development and critical facilities in safer areas. • The Hazard Maps should be referenced in preparing Community Plans. • Preparing or revising land use ordinances -� and rules, including but not limited to the following: revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or the Zoning Maps; zone change ordinances; revisions to the Special Management Area (SMA) rules or boundarie ; W revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance, and a the preparation of new ordinances or rules. Z • Projects undertaken with State or County lands or funds should be planned outside of known hazard areas. • The Hazard Maps shall serve as a guide in the review of subdivision and land use permit applications, but may not be used to prohibit a land use that is allowed by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or by permit. 5.4 HAZARD MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 247 248 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Ha`ena Princeville KU loH.wy _ Hanalei k • Kilauea, I Ana la keMa d. f pa •3m _Ka Wailua: 3 �d����� • 'o �� • Ha ama'ulu Y . Kekaha CihWe Waimea y • c-� �y • _ Nawiliwili' Kalaheo �`� •j,;4es Hanapepe7 �� �,�, " 'Ele' e :� r -� , • ',koloa • - ra • • Po�ipu y 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Figure 5 -15 Kaua'i Island Hazard Map ddd Space., J• Dams ExtremeTsunami Zone I -v High Risk Flood Zone A • Emergency Shelters Tsunami Evacuation Zone Moderate Risk Flood Zone • Critical Facilities Wildfire Risk Rating Streams High Major Roads Medium Roads Low 248 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN J Critical Facilities • Airports • Civic Centers • Y Harbors • �rV Schools Correctional enter Electric Facilities Hospitals Landfill Wastewater Treatment Plants • Dams A Emergency Shelters Streams Major Roads Roads Tsunami Evacuation Zone ExtremeTsunami Zone t add space, R rkala Miles I 0 1.5 - High Risk Flood Zone - Moderate Risk Flood Zone Wildfire Risk Rating High Medium Low 1 in = 3 miles NORTH 3 6 5.4 HAZARD MAPS S.0 POLICY MAPS 249 I ele or A Hanapepe Heigh Kaumakani Hanapepe le'ele lewili• puma via ,%, Workforce Housing Salt Pond--'� Beach Park POI"t Allen fi NoTE: remove, spc Figure 5 -17 Hanapepel- 'Ele'ele Hazard Map Critical Facilities * Airports * Civic Centers r� Harbors * Schools Ce i+er * i/ Electric Facilities Hospitals Landfill / Wastewater Treatment Plants I 1 r le'ele lewili• puma via ,%, Workforce Housing Salt Pond--'� Beach Park POI"t Allen fi NoTE: remove, spc Figure 5 -17 Hanapepel- 'Ele'ele Hazard Map Critical Facilities * Airports * Civic Centers * Harbors * Schools Ce i+er * Correctional (E> Electric Facilities Hospitals Landfill / Wastewater Treatment Plants • Dams A Emergency Shelters Streams Major Roads Roads Tsunami Evacuation Zone 0 ExtremeTsunami Zone t ,,ad spaC,4P, 250 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Miles I I I 0 0.75 1.5 3 - High Risk Flood Zone - Moderate Risk Flood Zone Wildfire Risk Rating High Medium Low Kalaheo -_ ; %e a — Kalawoi Park �� ~ T ~-0 rna'o i - • � } ,yam , y. _—t iF Kukui'ula 40 p u Po'ipu Beach Figure 5 -18 South Kaua'i Hazard Map Critical Facilities • Airports • Dams • Civic Centers A Emergency Shelters • Harbors • Schools czvl "eX Streams I/ Correctional 32E Major Roads Electric Facilities Roads Hospitals F77 Tsunami Evacuation Zone Landfill Wastewater Treatment Plants ExtremeTsunami Zone add sPc►ce, a Waita Reservoir �- - J yo 1 in = 2 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.75 1.5 3 - High Risk Flood Zone - Moderate Risk Flood Zone Wildfire Risk Rating High Medium Low 5.4 HAZARD MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 251 V V CI CS 3 Figure 5 -19 Lihu'e Hazard Map Hanamafulu Wilcox Memorial Hosoital� 'A Li hWe Kukui Grove Shopping Center Puhi tid g'r uMUali =i -Hwy ; r' Naw Alekoko Fishpond Critical Facilities • Airports e Dams • Civic Centers A Emergency Shelters • Harbors CehT� Streams • Schools Correctional ente Major Roads Electric Facilities Roads Hospitals Tsunami Evacuation Zone Landfill Wastewater Treatment Plants ExtremeTsunami Zone 0,4a space, 252 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Lihu'e Air Miles 0 C High Risk Flood Zone - Moderate Risk Flood Zone Wildfire Risk Rating High Medium Low Figure 5 -20 East Kaua'i Hazard Map r Dams Critical Facilities Emergency Shelters • Airports • Civic Centers Major Roads • Harbors ✓ • Schools Cehrev ExtremeTsunami Zone Low Correctional enter Electric Facilities Hospitals Landfill Wastewater Treatment Plants r Dams High Risk Flood Zone Emergency Shelters Moderate Risk Flood Zone Streams Wildfire Risk Rating Major Roads Roads High ,I Tsunami Evacuation Zone Medium ExtremeTsunami Zone Low add space, 5.4 HAZARD MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 253 d 3 3 Kilauea Lighthouse / Princeville Ha'ena Hanalei River Princeville Center fYKllauea ti � ^ i,;77 ir#:' 1:::4/.../-,hil.‘k...o.to„,..1%.:#4(?7„003P--,,,,,,:\,.,, _ * i,..?"1 - __ /7;1],h34.61/-*HW\I. trf 7'5\' . 1 C5 77 Hanalei 11 / ,/ /. `apa • F PrincevdlGAirport 1in = 1m. ; NORTH Miles 0 0.75 1.5 3 Figure 5-21 North Shore Hazard Map Critical Facilities High Risk Flood Zone iiitiatt* Airports • Dams * Civic Centers • Emergency Shelters _ Moderate Risk Flood Zone * Harbors Streams * Schools SPX Wildfire Risk Rating • Correctional ente Major Roads High • Electric Facilities Roads Hospitals Medium Tsunami Evacuation Zone * Landfill Low `/ * Wastewater Treatment Plants ExtremeTsunami Zone it add space: 254 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 595 INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS The Infrastructure Maps are a new addition to this General Plan. The maps identify the locations of existing infrastructure systems for water, wastewater, electrical power generation, and solid waste. These maps are intended to be used as a resource to guide responsible decision - making about future land use and infrastructure investments. The Infrastructure Maps should be periodically reviewed and updated as additional data becomes available. The Infrastructure Maps include the following information: • Solid Waste Management Facilities • Private Water System Services Areas Service. • County Water System Service Areas • Waste W' ater Treatment Plant In1a6+,0—' wo&P—� • Sewer Pump Stations • County Wastewater System Service Areas • Private Wastewater Service Area Ay -acts • Power Plants • State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands • Planning District Boundary • Major Roads • Roads Purposes of the Infrastructure Maps The purposes of the Infrastructure Maps are as follows: • To depict existing systems for water, wastewater, electrical power generation, and solid waste. Facilities and service areas have been mapped using existing data sources and depict general locations that are intended to be representational, not precise. • To be used as a planning tool in conjunction with other policy maps to help identify and prioritize infrastructure needs in existing and future growth areas. • To be referenced in preparing Community Plans and in preparing or revising land use 6 ordinances and rules, including but not limited to the following: revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or the Zoning Maps, zone change ordinances,; U ✓V revisions to the Special Management Area o (SMA) rules or boundaries; revisions to the 2 Subdivision Ordinance; and,,' V/1/ preparation V/1/ of new ordinances or rules. NOTE: remo�w+�c • To serve as a guide in the review of subdivision and land use permit applications and to aid in determining infrastructure needs, but may not be used to prohibit a land use that is allowed by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance or by permit. 5.5 INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 255 Figure 5 -22 Kauai Island Infrastructure Map Landfill t Power Plants • Waste Water Treatment Plant Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area __._..,. County VQZste W rSystem Service Area Was�ewa►-44X 256 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Miles I L 0 2.5 Private Wastewater Service Area 3h6la Ila ; 1 in = 4 miles NORTH 5 State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 10 d Figure 5 -23 Waimea - Kekaha Infrastructure Map Solid Waste Management Facilities c Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station A Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area aste r Facilities • aste r Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines County Servi a ste Wate System 2 Electric Facilities • Power Plants State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads s NORTH 4 5.5 INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 257 Kaurnakani 01okele Sugar Mill-7 Salt Pond_ Beach Park Hanapepe Heights Hanapepe �a�epP Ra % 1 X : Port Allen NOTE: remove. spaces Figure 5 -24 Hanapepe- Ele'ele Infrastructure Map Water Facilities FMPrivate Water �T�T System Service Area County Water System Service Area ast er Facilities aste W r Treatment Plant C, Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines – County aste a System Service rea 258 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN � `Ele'ele Lima O/a Workforce Housing wili -Rd--_ Miles I I 0 0.5 1 Electric Facilities f Power Plants 0 State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 1 in = 1 miles NORTH 2 Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station ♦ Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container V Redemption Center ✓ ow Vas Water Facilities FMPrivate Water �T�T System Service Area County Water System Service Area ast er Facilities aste W r Treatment Plant C, Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines – County aste a System Service rea 258 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN � `Ele'ele Lima O/a Workforce Housing wili -Rd--_ Miles I I 0 0.5 1 Electric Facilities f Power Plants 0 State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 1 in = 1 miles NORTH 2 V/ Figure 5 -25 South Kauai Infrastructure Map Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center �k&< kt �py Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area aste Wate Facilities • 40aaste Zat> Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines Count aste Wate System ervice rea 1 in = 2 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.75 1.5 3 Electric Facilities • Power Plants 0 State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 5.5 INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 259 o d 10 I:5 0- 6 Figure 5 -26 Uhu'e Infrastrur Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station A Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center 0k� ME Water Facilities Electric Facilities Private Water • Power Plants System Service Area County Water State Land Use District System Service Area -. Urban Designated Lands aste Wate Facilities Planning District Boundary • aste a Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Major Roads Sewerlines Roads County aste Wate System Ser a 260 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN V/ Figure 5 -27 East Kaua'i Infrastructure Map Solid Waste Management Facilities Water Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center - Private Water System Service Area ■ Refuse Transfer Station County Water ♦ Green Waste Diversion Site System Service Area Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center aste Wat Facilities • aste 'Wa-t-el Treatment Plant • Sewer Pump Stations �a Sewerlines o-Gj County ste System Service Area 1 in = 2 miles NORTH Miles I I I I 0 l 2 4 Electric Facilities • Power Plants State Land Use District _ -- Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 5.5 INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 261 1 Ha'e r Princeville ryuptw-r-i Figure 5 -28 North Shore Infrastructure Map Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area aste Wa Facilities • aste Wat Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines fCount aste r _.._._._ System Service Area 262 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN -- Kilauea Lighthouse lirport Miles I L 0 1.75 Electric Facilities • Power Plants — State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 1 in = 3 miles NORTH 3.5 7 Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station ♦ Green Waste Diversion Site ✓ Deposit Beverage Container ✓ Redemption Center k� 1 Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area aste Wa Facilities • aste Wat Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines fCount aste r _.._._._ System Service Area 262 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN -- Kilauea Lighthouse lirport Miles I L 0 1.75 Electric Facilities • Power Plants — State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads 1 in = 3 miles NORTH 3.5 7 5.6 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAPS The General Plan Public Facilities Maps are a new purposes of the Public addition to this General Plan. The maps identify Facilities Maps the locations of existing public facilities on Kaua'i. These maps are intended to be used as a reference The purposes of the Public Facilities Maps are as in planning public facilities and services to support follows: future land uses and development. The Public . To depict the locations of existing public Facilities Maps should be periodically reviewed and facilities. These facilities have been mapped updated as additional data becomes available. The using existing data sources and depict Public Facilities Maps are a general reference, and general locations that are intended to be may not be used to determine whether adequate representational, not precise. facilities or services exist to support or deny a proposed land use. To be used as a planning tool in identifying existing areas that may need additional facilities, services, or mitigation plans for The Public Facilities Maps include the following protection or relocation. They can also help information: ensure that future development is supported • Neighborhood Centers by adequate facilities. • Post Offices To be referenced in preparing Community • Schools Plans and Functional Plans. • Police Stations • Harbors • Hospitals / • Civic Centers Cp*14eX V Correctional ente • Airports • Fire Stations • Parks muy.Aavies • Planning District un • Major Roads ZoreS • Extreme Tsunami Evacuation on 5.6 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 263 Ha er Princeville t -: 'K- Ghio:H.wv Hanalei ,T Klauea r - Ana ^.lam, ; Pdof tl7 Shire-,,- East l:dua i t a r xy' Kapa.a ;- lAic�mea � " —�` `Wail a• r i r . 3. 'Llhu'e_ .err ;°- � � ,•Vr � �i s Na4nape&- 'Ele:'e(ei Hanama ulu r�`Y Kekah-a {4 = r UhWe p �, z I Waimea ..:f �y Nawiliwili Soufh Kaua - fKala- o J �a Hanapepe 'Ele,ele a QKoloa �a Po'ip0- Cl 264 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles Figure 5 -29 Kauai Island Public Facilities 0 2.5 5 10 Neighborhood Centers Correction en Roads Post Offices © Airports Schools © Fire Stations k Police Stations Parks and Recreation Harbors Planning District Boundary © Hospitals ExtrenneTssunanni Evacuation Zone E3 Civic Centers Major Roads OI.CIC' SPACE 264 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN J Figure 5 -30 Waimea - Kekaha Public Facilities „Y Cp L; Neighborhood Centers Correctionaen e+rD Roads E Post Offices © Airports Schools © Fire Stations Police Stations Parks and Recreation M Harbors Planning District Boundary © Hospitals ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone Civic Centers Major Roads 'A.1cl spaoe, fS+ ' i e° NOTE: rea►-ra"3e Key does not obsc.u.►- map vndeA- ftea-1i. 5.6 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 265 Olokele 'Ele'ele —Lima Ola Workforce Housing lewili•Rd--., NOTE: rerylove, Sp4c2 / Figure 5 -31 Hanapepc.Nle'ele Public Facilities 1 in = 1 miles Miles I I I I 0 0.s 1 z Solid Waste Management Facilities Water Facilities Electric Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center Private Water System Service Area • Power Plants ■ Refuse Transfer Station County Water – State Land Use District A Green Waste Diversion Site System Service Area — _— _I Urban Designated Lands Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center Waste Water Facilities Planning District Boundary g Y • Waste Water Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Major Roads Sewerlines Roads County Waste Water System Service Area NoTr: cHaki9e' +a Public, Facilities Maps key wild ame'- �dm�� +s C'i { _J DK PA.y a65, 266 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN .. i Kalowa Park d Kalaheo Via. _ ro Waito Reservoir ' 1� © a r o Lawa`i' / r pd /,na \ a i(L Kukui'ula Pppu a= Po'ipu Beach Park - 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Miles Figure 5 -32 South Kaua'i Public Facilities 0 0.5 1 2 Neighborhood Centers Correctional(ED Roads 0 Post Offices © Airports {C Schools Fire Stations 0 Police Stations Parks and Recreation 0 Harbors Planning District Boundary © Hospitals Extreme�T.sunami Evacuation Zone / E3 Civic Centers Major Road �Ci space, V 5.6 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 267 268 KAUXI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN HanamaVUL- Wilcox Memorial Hospital J / Uhu'e Kukui Grove Ahuk�ni•Rd rf _ ? . L�hu'e Airport Shopping Center ®J CD :. PUN -- `Kaumuali'i•HWY `a Nawiliwili _ u Kip A/ekoko- rishpond - 1 in = 1 miles NORTH j Miles Figure 5 -33 Lihu'e Public Facilities '' 0 0.5 1 2 cev%+e V Neighborhood Centers Corrections Center Roads Q Post Offices © Airports Schools Fire Stations E2 Police Stations Parks and Recreation Harbors Planning District Boundary © Hospitals ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone Civic Centers Major Road 0"48 Sp0.CQi 268 KAUXI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN n ,y + ►; . Ar Anahola— Post Office .pt, F. itsb., a4gY>a;:".i•fr:.:.,a"��- �.-,.. �.. i r Figure 5 -34 East Kaua'i Public Neighborhood Centers Q Post Offices Schools Police Stations Harbors © Hospitals E3 Civic Centers na-Rd /' Ka Bypa. l "Coconut Marketplace Wail a Cen+'er' Correctional nter © Airports Fire Stations - Parks and Recreation Planning District Boundary Extreme,TTsunami Evacuation Zone Major Roads a1JC4 SPGICe, if Mahelono Medical Center Kapo'o Beach Park _Bryan J. Baptiste Sports Complex 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Palms Miles 0 0.5 1 2 Roads 5.6 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAPS ! S.0 POLICY MAPS 269 Ha`e 270 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN �laueo Princeville nale - fr 'aC � F" i r ilitie'� AW ^w.,iA�i,,.Y � , 14e.r Correctional ente Ro © Airports NOTE: rem Q Fire Stations - Parks and Recreati Planning District B ary ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone Major Road GLCIJ SpeLCe, ads oV40— 9I I'" A 1 in = 2 miles NORTH 2 4 Id 3 Figure 5 -35 North Shore "Public,F'ac Neighborhood Centers Post Offices FA Schools 0 Police Stations CT Harbors © Hospitals Civic Centers 270 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN �laueo Princeville nale - fr 'aC � F" i r ilitie'� AW ^w.,iA�i,,.Y � , 14e.r Correctional ente Ro © Airports NOTE: rem Q Fire Stations - Parks and Recreati Planning District B ary ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone Major Road GLCIJ SpeLCe, ads oV40— 9I I'" A 1 in = 2 miles NORTH 2 4 Id 3 5.7 TRANSPORTATION MAPS There are two General Plan Transportation Maps. Purpose Of the Transportation Maps One shows existing and planned improvements for roadway capacity, the roadway network, and The purposes of the Transportation Maps are as shared use paths. The second depicts proposed follows: improvements to the transit system. Community- • To depict the locations of major anticipated scale improvements such as sidewalks and bike improvements to KauaTs transportation lanes are intended to be refined in Community network during the planning horizon of the and Functional Plans. Keys to these maps are General Plan. Anticipated improvements provided in Table 5 -1 and Table 5 -2, respectively. have been mapped based on available The Transportation Maps should be periodically planning documents. Locations of reviewed and updated as additional data becomes anticipated improvements are intended to be available. The Transportation Maps are a general representational, not precise. reference, and may not be used to determine whether To be used as planning tool in identifying adequate facilities or services exist to support or areas that may need additional facilities or deny a proposed land use. services. They can also help ensure that future The following source documents were consulted to development is supported by adequate identify anticipated transportation improvements to multimodal facilities. 2035: To be referenced in preparing Community ✓ • Kauai Transit Feasibility Study (2016)': KTFS d ti Plans and Functional Plans. ✓ • Kapa'a Transportation Solutions (2015);: KTS_� ✓ • Bike Plan Hawaii (2003) : BPH ✓ • South Kaua'i Community Plan (2015);: SKCP o ✓ • Lihu'e Community Plan (2015);: LCP► ✓ • Kilauea Town Plan (2005);: KTP W h ✓ • West Side Path Alternatives (2012);: WS PA ✓ • North Shore Path Alternatives (2012);: NSPA • Kaua'i State Transportation Improvements ✓ Program (FY2015- 2018);: KSTIP The map includes the following information, with associated sources indicated: • Existing Roads • Future Roads.: KTS, SKCP, LCP, KTP, STIP • Shared Use Paths (Existing and Future),: County of Kaua'i (existing), SKCP, LCP, WSPA, • NSPA, STIP • Planning District Boundary;: Hawai'i DBEDT (1983) • Major Roads,: Hawai'i Department of Transportation (2009) Figure 5 -37 is taken from the Draft Kauai Transit Feasibility Study (201;6). 1 NOTE: remove aot-7 5.7 TRANSPORTATION MAPS 15.0 POLICY MAPS 271 Table 5 -1 Kaua'i Island Transportation Roadway Map Key: Roadway Capacity, Network,and Shared Use Paths IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ROADS 1. Kilauea Road Multimodal Access Improvements to Kilauea Lighthouse National Wildlife Refuge 2. Multimodal capacity improvements to Kawaihau Road 3. Widen the northern segment of Kapa'a Bypass Road to two -lane and two -way from the northern end of the Bypass to the roundabout at Olohena Road 4. Operational improvements such as signalization and left turn restrictions on Kuhi6 Highway from Kapa'a Town to Kuamo'o Road 5. Add one lane on Kuhio Highway from southern end of Kapa'a Bypass Road to Kuamo'o Road 6. Extension of right turn lane on Haleilio Road at Kuhi6 Highway 7. Add one lane on Kuhi6 Highway from Kuamo'o Road to Kapule Highway 8. Implementation of Uhu'e TIGER Grant Project Improvements 9. Congestion Management project on Kaumuali'i Highway from Anonui Street to Maluhia Road 10. Multimodal capacity improvements to Po'ipu Road NEW ROADS 13uTE: revno+ae pcviod 11. (a) New Kilauea Entry Road; and; (b :) Kilauea Entry Road Expansion 12. Connections between Kapa'a Bypass Road and Neighborhoods 13. Connection between Kuhi6 Highway and Kapa'a Bypass Road 14. Connection between Kuamo'o Road and Ma'alo Road 15. Lihu'e Mauka Route HC &Llo 16. Northerly Leg of the Western Access Road SHARED USE PATHS 17. North Shore Path (alignment location and phases to be determined) 18. Completion of Ke Ala Hele Makalae from Ahihi Point to Anahola 19. Completion of Ke Ala Hele Makalae to L-ihu'e 20. South Shore Path (see South Kaua'i Community Plan) 21. West Side Path (Phase 1 Hanap6pE, Town to Salt Pond and Waimea to Kekaha. Future phases and alignments to be determined) Projects in this table are not listed in order of priority. Numbers refer to Figure 5 -36. which maps these projects geographically. Other types of projects not listed include safety (such as Safe Routes to School and intersection improvements) and system preservation (such as resurfacing and bridge replacement/repair). Other bikeway projects are noted in community plans and the Kapa'a Transportation Solutions Plan. 272 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Figure 5 -36 Kaua'i Island -Wide Transportation Map: Showing Roadway Capacity, Networks, Shared Use Paths, and Scenic Corridors Planning District Boundary Scenic Corridors Major Roads Roads Existing Shared Use Path Future Shared Use Path Improvements to Existing Roads ., Future Roads A 1 in = 4 miles NORTH 0 2.5 5 EN 5.7 TRANSPORTATION MAPS 1 5.0 POLICY MAPS 273 d .d 3 E. 0 E a Y 1� CL O a Table 5 -2 Priority Transit Capacity Projects Projects are not listed in order of priority. REGIONAL TRANSIT SHUTTLES 1. Implement Regional Transit Shuttles • North Shore Shuttle (Kilauea Lighthouse to KC-'E, Beach) • East Side Shuttle (Lydgate Park to Kealia Beach) • Reconfigure Wailua and Kapahi Shuttles • Reconfigure Lihu'e Shuttles • Po'ipu -K61oa Shuttle • Hanapepe to K61oa Shuttle TRANSIT MAINLINES 1. Reconfigure and expand service frequency for transit mainlines Figure 5 -37 Kaua'i Island Transit Map Kauai Shuttle Concepts Peak Express Routes ••••••• Hanalei- Lihu'e Peak Express ••••••• Kekaha- LThu'e Peak Express ••••••• West Side- Po'ipu Peak Express ••••••• Po'ipu- Ltltu'e Peak Express Mainline Routes Kfilaheo- Kapa'a Mainline Kekaha- Lihu'e Mainline -- Hanalei- LThu'e Mainline Shuttle Routes East Side Shuttle Kapahi- Wail@Shuttle - North Shore Shuttle South Shore Shuttle Hanapepe -Koloa Shuttle (PoeMrd r"7 dn.kP d M prrafTM Ksu.r Bus S- rr.Rar'" Tramp Fri-) JW cc�� �., ` ekaha Select trips to PMR �� . tllttfdllf Memorial HMU N Ha'ena state Park Nom: insu-t anmcnded Hqurc 5-37 wi+A change, fro"-1 Wailya fo Wailua- Princeville Addmbnel shuttles wie operate be&men Klauea antl me National Re iGlaueO tigtWa Refuge a[ KCf 3 . UVdW& when open /w vlsRation r - 3 •. se fs :► Ar ahola � w + LihveAkprxt Sehcr tops to Middle Scf Expensiwr W route 7n WaeuB rrw»esteads subject ro bnprcvemenr W one•Jane bridges -- Schedules wee be offset to provide 30-nhade r _ service between 1S61ahao and Kape'e. • ..1,� ` W12arr Memorial Hospital �{ KawICommunhy Puhl ' Thned connec9cas between ' /1(/! • Q express routes in Kelabso. Kukui Gn", \r4"- Hnnaplipe Stapgng [enter � ` •�• Ko1oa Port Allen ••• — - Mahetona Memoral Hospital VLydg9ateParA Hanama'ulu w + LihveAkprxt shim/a opfrons in Uwe ' and connections to LRru'9 Akpwt and PuN to be evM ared es pert or The Kaua78us St0t- R#rVTansH Plan 4 1 2 Mi. Source: " ra ^Transit Feasibility Study, Nelson \Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc., 2016 1� ✓t/ NOTE: A'emo� "pr44"' al,ncl aolal kauc6 274 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN i i-\ r_� r— r— r— r� r— n i r— t� 1. Anderson, T. R., Fletcher, C. H., Barbee, M. M., u Frazer, L. N., & Romine, B. M. (2015). Doubling of coastal erosion under rising sea level by mid- .' century in Hawaii. Natural Hazards, 78(1), 75 `103. https: / /doi.org /l 0.1007/s1 1069-015-1698-6. ` 7 2. American Planning Association. (2016). APA Website. https://www.planning.org/ Architecture 2030. (2014). Roadmap to Zero Emissions. http: // 8 architecture203O.org /initiatives /roadmap -to- zero/. J 3. Booske, t al. (2010). County Health Rankings 9 Weighting Methodology. 4. Cassiday, Ricky. (2014). Kauai Rental Market: Affordable Rental Housing Study Update, 2014. 5. Charlier Associates, Inc. (2012). Kauai Multimodal Land Transportation Plan: Planning for a Sustainable Transportation Plan in Kauai County Through 2035. 6. CH2MHill. (2014). Federal -Aid Highways 2035 Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for the District of Kauai. Prepared for: State of Hawai'i Department of Transportation Highways Division. City of Portland. Four Types of Transportation Cyclists. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/ transportation /article /158497 Fix iF needed Collaborative Economics. (September 2015). An In -Depth Look into Kaua'i's Economy - Summary Report. Collaborative Economics. (November 2013). DevelopingA SharedAgenda: Forthe North Shore of Oahu's Economic Vitality and Community Well - Being DraftAction Plan. 10. County of Kaua'i Housing Agency. (April 2015). Consolidated Plan 2015 -2020. 11. County of Kaua'i Office of Economic Development and Kaua'i Economic Development Board. (2016). Draft Kaua'i's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Report 2005 - ,2015. 1 6.0 REFERENCES 277 V/ 12. County of Kaua'i Department of Parks and 21 Recreation. (2013). Kaua'i Parks & Recreation Master Plan. 13. CountyofKaua 'i Planning Department. (September 2014). South Kauai Form -Based Code. 14. County of Kaua'i Planning Department (July 2015). South Kauai Community Plan. Prepared for County of Kaua'i. http: / /www.Kauai.gov /Government/ Departments - Agencies /Planning- Department/ Long-Range-Division/South-Kaua'i-Community- Plan. 15. County of Kaua'i Planning Department. (2010). Lihu'e Town Core Urban Design Plan. http: // www. Kauai.gov /Portals /0 /Planning /pro .dect_, documents /LTCUDP Intro Ordinance.p df ?ver= 2015- 04 -22- 152009 -763. rGV+nov&e- bl aYNY_ s pace, 16.(=County of Kaua'i Planning Department. (November 2000). Kauai General Plan. 17. County of Kaua'i Planning Department & SSFM International, Inc. (June 2015). Lihu'e Community Plan (LCP). 18. County of Kaua'i Planning Department; PRB Hawai'i & Associates, Inc. (2005). Lihu'e Civic Center Site Improvements Master Plan. 19 W County of Kaua'i; University of Hawai'i Social Science Research Institute's Hazards, Climate & Environment Program. 2015 Update. County of Kauai Multi- Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan. (=htt.p://www.Kauai.gov/Portals/O/Civil- Defense/2015 Hazard Mitigation Plan /03 Hazard Identification.pdf?ver=201 6-01 -28-162800-187 fix if neede" County of Kaua'i. (2014). County of Kauai Multi - Hazard Mitigation & Resilience Plan, 2015 Update: Chapter 6 Appendix C: Hanalei to Ha'ena Community Disaster Resilience Plan. http: // hazards - climate- C)environment.org /yahoo site admin /assets /dots /Chapter 6 Appendix E- Best Practice of Community Resilience - Hanalei Watershed Hui.17610716.pdf -�i x i� vu ed ed 278 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Countyof Kaua'i.( December2012).Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO), Amended. http: / /www. Kaua'i.gov /Portals /0 /Planning /CZO /Ord No 935 Updated CZO .pdf 22. County of Kaua'i. (2010). Kaua'i Energy Sustainability Plan. 23. County of Kaua'i. (2001). Kauai County Storm Water Runoff System Manual. 24. County of Kaua'i. (1981). Agricultural Plan. http:H files .Hawaii.gov /luc /col<aual /a80- 474dped.pdf. 25. Center for Island Climate Adaptation and Policy. (2010). Hawai'i's Changing Climate Briefing Sheet.�s http: / /www.soest.Hawaii.edu /coasts/ publications /ClimateBrief low.pdf Fix i-F ntedPd 26. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2014). About Smart Growth. 27. Experience Kaua'i Tours & Transportation.(2015). North Shore Shuttle Feasibility Study. http://www. kauaishuttlestudy.com/ Prepared for the County of Kaua'i. 28. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (November 2010). Kauai County, Hawai'i Flood Insurance Rate Map Update. http: / /www.Kauai. gov /portals /0 /pw bldg /flood review /flood zone maps/2010/15000200 95F.pdf 29. Fukunaga &Associates. (May 2015 and September 2015 updates - unpublished draft). Technical Memorandum: County of Kauai Water Use & Development Plan Update. 30. Fukunaga and Associates. 2013. Technical Memo, 2015 draft Needs Assessment Study and Facility Reserve Charge Update. 31. Greenbelt Alliance. (2016). GreenBelt Alliance Website. QhttpJ/www.greenbelt.org /land -use- lannin - dictiona /zonin /. Fix i-F heeded 32. Hawai'i Airports Modernization Program (2008). Accessed June 2016. http: / /www. hawaiiairportsmodernization.com/ 33. Hawai'i Department of Education; Hawai'i Health Initiative (HHI). 2007. Wellness Guidelines: Department of Education (DOE) Wellness Policy in Kauai Schools. V 34. Hawai'i State Commission on Water Resources Management. 2014. State Water Resource Protection Plan Draft Update. http: / /files.Hawaii. gov /dlnr /cwrm /planning /wrpp2014update/ WRPP- 2014Ch8Summa ryD-roughtPlannincg.pdf 35. Hawai'i State Department of Health (DOH), Chronic Disease Management and Control Branch. (2011). Chronic Disease Disparities Report 2011: Social Determinants. http: / /health.Hawaii.gov /chronic- disease /files /2013/12/CD BurdenReport FINAL. 36. Hawai'i State Department of Health (DOH); Loretta J. Fuddy, A.C.S.W., M.P.H. Director of Health; Neil Abercrombie, Governor. (2013). Strategic Plan, FY 2011 -2014. http: / /health.Hawaii.gov /opppd/ files /2013 /04 /Five Foundations.pdf. 37. Hawai'i State Legislature. (2005). Act 183, Relating to Important Agricultural Lands. SLH 2008; HRS §205 -41. 38. Hawai'i Tourism Authority. (2000- 2011). Annual Visitor Research Report. 39. Hazards, Climate, & Environment Program, University of Hawai'i Social Science Research Institute and Disaster Resilience LLC with the Kaua'i County Emergency Defense Agency and the County of Kaua'i. (2015 Update). County of Kauai Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan. http: / /www.Kauai. gov/ CivilDefense /MultiHazardMitigationPlan 40. Health & Education Communication Consultants; Design Associates Kaua'i. (March 2012). West Side Path Alternatives Report. http: / /www.kauaipath. org /files /content /WS Path Alternatives.pdf. Prepared for Kaua'i Path, Inc. 41. International Association for Public Participation (IAP2); �_� http: / /www.dse.vic.gov.au /effective- engagement /developi ng- an- engagement -pla n/ .a-model-for-engagement Fix If needed 42. Island Press. (2012). Climate Change and Pacific Islands: Indicators and Impacts, Pacific Islands Regional Climate Assessment. http: / /www.cakex. org/ sites /default /files /documents /NCA- PIRCA- FINAL -int- print- 1.13 - web.form .pdf 43. Jung, Ian. (April 30, 2015). Presentation to the General Plan CAC: Growth Management Issues for this General Plan. 44. Kapa'a Business Association website. (2015). http: / /www.kbaKaua'i.orgg/ 45. Kaua'i Community Health Initiative. (June 2014). Kaua'i Community Health Improvement Plan. 46. Kaua'i Community Health Initiative. (July 2013). Kaua'i Community Health Needs Assessment. http: / /health.Hawaii.gov /Kaua'i /files /2013/07/ KAUA'I -CH NA -July -2013. pdf 47. Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative (KIUC). (2014). Journey 2014: KIUC Annual Report. http: / /kiuc. coopwebbuilder2.com /sites /kiuc /files /PDF/ annualreport /annualreport2014.pdf 48. Kaua'i Planning & Action Alliance. (July 2015). Kaua'i Tourism Strategic Plan Update FY 2016- 2018. Prepared for County of Kaua'i, Office of Economic Development. http: / /www.Kauai.gov/ Portals /0 /OED / Kaua'i TSPU Executive Summary-, FINAL.pdf 49. Landmark Consulting. (January 2012). North Shore Path Alternatives Report: An Assessment of Opportunities & Constraints for the Development of a Multi -use Path Network to Connect the Communities of Kilauea, Princeville, and Hanalei. 50. Mulkern, Anne C. Scientific American. (September 9, 2013). As Pacific Islands Flood, A Climate- Driven Exodus Grows. https: / /www.scientificamerican. com /article /as- pacific- islands - flood- ('_- a- climate- driven - exodus /. Fix if r}ee8e8 51. National Historic Preservation Act. (1966).16 U.S.C. §§ 470a et seq. 52.Opticos Design_ Inc. (2016). Summary of Community Place Types and Degree -of- Change Visioning Workshops for the Kauai General Plan. 53. Pacific Business News. (Feb 3, 2016). Kauai Utility Reaches 90% Renewable Energy Utilization. http: // www.biz -oournals.com /pacific /news /2016/02/03/ Kauai - utility- reaches -90- renewable- energy.html. 54. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. (2010). (Publication No. 111 -148, §2702, 124 Stat. 119, 318 -319). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 55. PBR Hawai'i & Associates, Inc. (2015). Kaua'i 2035 General Plan Technical Study: Land Use Buildout Analysis. 6.0 REFERENCES 279 56. PlanPacific, Inc. (September 2005 Draft). Kilauea Town Plan. Prepared for Kaua'i County Planning Department. 57. Policy Link. (2016). All -In Cities: Building an Equitable Economy from the Ground Up. 58. Policy Link. (2011). Why Place and Race Matters. http: / /www.poIicyl ink.org /sites /default /files/ WHY PLACE AND RAC5G;)MATTER FULL %2 OREPORT_WEB.PDF FIX 1� rneeded 59. QMark Research (2015). Kauai Visitor Survey. 60. RM Towill. (May 2015). 2035 General Plan Kauai Infrastructure Analysis. 61. R.M. Towill Corporation; Commission on Water Resource Management Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawai'i. (1990). Kauai Water Use and Development Plan. Prepared for the Department of Water, County of Kaua'i. 62. RW Beck. (September 2009). Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan. Prepared for the County of Kaua'i Department of Public Works -Solid Waste Division. 63. Shimogawa, Duane. Pacific Business News. (Feb 3, 2016). Kauai utility reaches 90% renewable energy utilization. http: / /www.biz)ournals.com/ pacific /news /2016 /02 /03 / Kaua'i- utilitv- reaches- 90- renewable- energy.htm I 64. SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. (February 2014). Kauai 2035 General Plan: Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts. 65 SMS Research; (prepared for the Hawai'i Housing Finance and Development Corporation). November 2011. Hawai'i Housing Planning Study, 2011. https: / /dhhl.hawaii.gov /wp- content/ unloads /201 1 /05 /DHHL2008LesseeReoortFina1. pdf ►remove cow.w.a 40W.0 L.avIds 66. SMS Research, (prepared for the State of Hawai'i ✓ Department of Hawaiian Homelands). March 2009. DHHL Lessee Survey, 2008. http: / /files. Hawaii.aov /dbedt /hhfdc /resources /HHPS201 1 study.pdf 67. SSFM International, Inc. (February201 6).Adequacy of Future Infrastructure on Kauai. 280 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 68. SSFM International, Inc. (July 2015). Updating the Vision for Kauai. 69. SSFM International, Inc. (September 2015). Issues and Opportunities for the Kauai 2035 General Plan. 70. Star Advertiser. (March 5, 2015). Home prices mostly up on Kauai, Hawaii Island last month. httra: / /www.staradvertiser.com /business /home- rarices- mostiv- uD -on- Kauai - Hawaii - island- r--)last- month/ Fix i� heeded 71. State of Hawai'i. (2014). Aloha+ Challenge Report: Recommendations for Taking Action and Tracking Progress. �,,-_Dhttp:Hdinr.Hawaii.gov /wp- content/ uploads /2014/11 /C015- Aloha- Challenae- Rot14. pdf fr i X i � in ended 72. State ofHawai 'i, Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (April 2015) Measuring Housing Demand in Hawaii, 2015 -202 udw pi,io.: 73. State of Hawai'i, Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism. Accessed June 2013. State of Hawaii Data Book: 1992, 2000, 2010; Historical Database (for years before 2000). 74. State of Hawai'i, Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism. (March 2012). Population and Economic Projections for the State of Hawaii to 2040.2040 Series. 75. State of Hawai'i, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL). (February 2012). Anahola Town Center Plan. For presentation to the Hawaiian Homes Commission. ►Ma{c.0 Iowt,�rCaSe I 76. State of Hawaitl Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL). (2014).ApplicantWaiting List Up to December, 2014 - Kaua'i. 77. State of Hawai'i, Department of Hawaiian Home I Lands, Kaulana H.R. Park Chairman. (June 2010). 1v Kamalomalo o, Anahola, Moloaa Regional ,� Plan. http: / /dhhl.Hawaii.gov /wp- (/Content/ uploads /2011 /06 /Anahola091907 small.pdf. Li 78. State of Hawai'i, Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLN R), Commission on Water Resource Management. (Draft Update 2014). Hawaii Water Resource Protection Plan. V V 79. State of Hawai'i, Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR), Department of Health. (April 2014 draft). 2014 State of Hawaii Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report: Integrated Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Congress Pursuant to §303(d) and §305(b), Clean Water Act (PL. 97 -117). http: // health.Hawai i.gov /cwb /files/2013/05/2014 Draft - Integrated -Report public - comment.pdf 80. State of Hawai'i, Department of Transportation. (2015). Kapa a Transportation Solutions. http:// kbakauai.org /wp- content /uploads /2015/10/ KapaaTransportationSolns82015 Cover- thru -Ch2. pdf 81. State of Hawai'i, Enterprise Zone Maps. ULI21/ invest.Hawai'i.gov /business /ez/ 82. State of Hawai'i, Executive Office on Aging. (October 2011 - September 2015). Hawaii State Plan on Aging. http: / /www.aarp.org /content/dam/ aarp /livable- communities /plan /planning /Hawai'i -e state - plan -on- aging- 2011 - 2015 -aarp pdf FiX it %ede iec� 83. State of Hawai'i, Hawai'i 2050 Sustainability Taskm Force. (Jarpary 2008). Hawaii 2050 SustainabilityA Plan. http:/ /myweb.facstaff.wwu.edu /patrick/ 0. Envs368 -- Hawaii /Readings /1- SustainabilityHawaii/ SustainabilityHawaii2050 Plan FINAL.pdf tote vie spc ce' ✓ 84. °State of Hawai'i, Hawai'i Tourism Authority. (2013). Visitor Plant Inventory. 6� 85. State of Hawai'i Office of Planning, DBEDT (2011).' Hawaii Housing Planning Study, 2011. http:/ /files. Hawaii.gov /dbedt /hhfdc /resources /HHPS2011 �► study_pdf. 89. The University of Hawai'i at Hilo Spatial Data Analysis and Visualization Laboratory in conjunction with the Hawai'i State Department of Agriculture. (2015). 2015 Hawaii Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline. 90. University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Department of Urban and Regional Planning. (August 2015). County of Kauai ImportantAgricultural Lands Study. 91. University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Center on the Family. (2014). Hawai'i Homeless Service Utilization Report .nhttp: / /uhfamily.Hawai'i.edu /publications/ ✓ brochures /60c33 HomelessServiceUtilizati on2014.pdf Remove e- x+yaheous iAr►cde- iikitq'q 92. University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program. (June 2014). Kauai Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment. 93. University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program, Center for Island Climate Adaptation and Policy (ICAP). (2010). HawaiTs Changing Climate: Briefing Sheet, 2010. http: / /www.soest.Hawaii.edu /coasts/ publications /ClimateBrief low.pdf 94. United Nations. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. 95. U.S. Census. (2010). Kauai County, Hawaii. •e 97 86. State of Hawai'i Office of Planning, BE F 98 (December 2014). Hawaii Natural Disaster A Economic Recovery Strategy. http: / /files.Hawaii. gov /dbedt/op /spb /2014 nders final.pdf. q n� 87. State of Hawai'i, Office of Plan ning, epartm- e-'nt off' c 99 usiness, Economic evelopment, and Planning ;- DBEDT)r(261 0). Hawaii Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS). 88. State of Hawai'i, Office of Planning. (2016). Technical Assistance Memorandum, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Order 5190. 6B. United States Congress. (1972). The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA). (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.) 'Idol pGVio.: U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2016). USDA Website(L�https : / /www.ams.usda.gov /services/ ✓ auditing/aaa -ho. Fix W rn-eeeolecl U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Society; County of Kaua'i Department of Water. (2006). Effects of Irrigation and Rainfall Reduction on Ground -Water Recharge in the Lihu'e Basin, Kaua'i, Hawaii. Walker, Brian, and David Salt. (2006). Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Island Press. 100. Walls & Associates (2007). National Establishment Time - Series (NETS) Database. 101. Wilkinson R, Marmot M, editors. 2003. Social determinants of health: The solid facts, 2nd ed. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. i 6.0 REFERENCES 281 erosion 66, 67, 68, 72, 77, 78, 81, 84, 85, 90, 91, 98, 103, 104, 105, 107, 150, 151, 182, 190, 194, 195, 207, 224, 239,277 farm worker housing 165,217 Floodplain Management Program 194 flood zone 217 food security 108, 191, 193, 312 forest 6, 99, 100, 108, 110 Forest Reserve Management Plans 99 General Plan 2000 25 General Plan Infrastructure Study 63 GMO 7,163, 309 golf course 80,148 Habitat Conservation Plan 109, 110, 303 H5'ena 42, 90, 91, 106, 153, 157, 190, 194, 278 Hanalei 39, 42, 53, 60, 62, 63, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 104, 106, 122, 134, 142, 156, 162, 172, 188, 190, 194, 278, 279, 298, 303, 306, 367, 379 Hanalei to Ha'ena Community Disaster Resilience Plan 190, 278 Hanama'ulu 60, 79, 80, 162, 174 Hanapepe 23, 28, 52, 53, 56, 60, 62, 63, 70, 71, 72, 73, 78, 119, 133, 142, 145, 147, 156, 169, 176, 194, 197, 209, 229, 242, 250, 258, 266, 272, 274, 297, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 308, 318, 320, 323, 324, 326, 358, 364, 372 Hawaiian language 202, 203, 204 Hawai'i Climate Adaptation Initiative 157 Hawai'i State Planning Act Priority Guidelines 195 Hawai'i Tourism Authority 7,157, 209, 279, 322, 323,364 hazard 63, 67, 68, 72, 78, 81, 84, 85, 90, 91, 107, 110, 116, 122, 170, 187, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 247 Holo Holo 178 houseless 9, 36, 39, 121, 122, 218, 363, 382 284 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN housing 9, 10, 19, 20, 26, 27, 32, 35, 36, 39, 41, 46, 47, 51, 52, 53, 56, 59, 60, 61, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 72, 80, 82, 83, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 92, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 125, 127, 129, 130, 136, 137, 155, 156, 162, 165, 167, 196, 197, 200, 201, 203, 204, 205, 215, 217, 218, 293, 296, 297, 307, 309, 311, 312, 315, 318, 320, 363, 364,382 hurricane 202,204 Infrastructure Assessment for the General Plan Update 63 Interagency Climate Adaptation Committee 7,182 invasive species 19, 97, 98, 99, 100, 108, 109, 110, 111, 217, 382 irrigation 101, 137, 139, 140, 163, 166 Kaha Wai 98 Kakou Committee 216, 220 Kapa'a 8, 39, 53, 55, 57, 60, 62, 64, 80, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 126, 134, 142, 147, 151, 156, 157, 169, 194, 204, 205, 271, 272, 279, 281, 295, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 310, 312, 313, 355, 364, 366 Kapa'a Transportation Solutions Plan 85, 272 Kaua'i Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment 296 ,Kauai Community College 156,312 Kaua'i Kakou 3, 36, 293, 299 Kaumakani 64,197 Kaumuali'i Highway 69, 70, 71, 74, 76, 77,126, 272 KCHII 8,205 Kealia 82, 137, 274, 302 Kekaha 23, 28, 52, 53, 60, 62, 63, 65, 66, 68, 133, 132, 142, 143, 151, 152, 153, 156, 163, 186, 197, 202, 227, 241, 249, 257, 265, 272, 297, 298, 303, 304, 306, 308, 318, 320, 323, 324, 326, 357, 364, 366, 374 Kekaha Landfill 68, 142, 143, 186 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor 67, 68 Ki Ki aOICL ✓ Kilauea 156,307' NOTE: Ghah9e all retevr-►')ces fro► -rl k;lauea 4D Ki lau.ea akld mev9e 411 s W I Nil -1 co pycf Zh al2X refe- C4.1ces po.9e 285. Kilauea 8, 60, 62, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 101, 111, 114, 118, 133, 139, 141, 162, 164, 169, 177, 188, 208, 271, 272, 274, 279, 280, 292, 304, 306, 367, 379 K6ke'e State Park 153 K6loa 39, 53, 56, 58, 60, 63, 74, 76, 77, 115, 116, 147, 156, 162, 164, 174, 178, 188, 197, 274, 296, 302, 304, 318, 363, 366, 367, 377 KLlhi6 Highway 79, 80, 82, 83, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92, 126, 272, 293 Kukui'ula 74, 76, 77,112, 366, 367 Land Use Buildout Analysis 26, 53, 63, 113, 117, 279, 296, 297, 315, 355, 363, 364, 365 land use map 79, 85 Ldwa'i 63, 74, 77, 78 Uhu'e 28, 36, 64, 79, 80, 101, 121, 185, 233, 244, 252, 260, 268, 292, 293, 296, 297, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 314, 318, 320, 321, 323, 326, 360, 363, 364, 366, 367, 370 Uhu'e airport 363 Lihu'e Community Plan 79,292 Uhu'e Town Core 292 Lihu'e Town Core Urban Design Plan 292 Lucy Wright Park 65, 69 M missing middle housing 85, 203 mixed use 56, 61, 90, 116, 117, 155, 156, 217, 305, 363,382 moku 6, 52, 171, 174, 177 Moloa'a 84, 85, 87, 162 Multi- Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan 190, 193, 278, 292 Multimodal Land Transportation Plan 8, 41, 123, 124, 277, 292, 296 Na Ala Hele 209 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 139 National Register of Historic Places 172, 173, 174 Native Hawaiian 30, 32, 45, 97, 119, 159, 160, 162, 171, 174, 176, 178, 199, 200, 204, 206, 207, 208 Nawiliwili 58, 79, 80, 81, 124, 139, 144, 145, 194 neighborhood - serving commercial 92 Niihau 6, 23, 52, 62, 202, 355 NOAA 8, 63, 66, 72, 78, 81, 84, 90,193, 194 NPDES 139 Office of Economic Development 155, 166, 216, 277,279 C" Oma'o 63, 74, 77 Ovr�aO open space 10, 33, 38, 39, 42, 53, 55, 71, 73, 78, 88, 92, 116, 147, 149, 151, 163, 178, 312 Open Space Commission 85, 99,178, 209, 216 park 65, 68, 69, 73, 76, 77, 80, 86, 88, 89, 91, 92, 99, 117, 130, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 218 parking 65, 68, 69, 71, 73, 74, 76, 82, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 92, 107, 122, 129, 133, 134, 144, 145, 148, 150, 152, 153, 158, 159, 207, 209, 218, 305, 382 Parking Management Plan 134 Parks and Recreation Master Plan 149 path 20, 27, 38, 66, 68, 85, 87, 89, 91, 92, 133, 151, 152, 299,302 Planning Commission 5,181, 215, 216, 220 plantation 35, 53, 64, 74, 80, 82, 103, 130, 147, 156, 162, 163, 169, 174 Po'ipu 74, 76, 77, 78, 139, 160, 274, 296, 318 pollutant 103,106 Port Allen 57, 58, 60, 62, 70, 71, 72, 73, 78, 144, 145, 156 Princeville 36, 56, 57, 58, 60, 62, 87, 88, 89, 90, 92, 115, 136, 137, 139, 145, 160, 172, 279, 302, 303, 305, 306, 307, 355, 366, 379 public access 82, 88, 92,100, 105, 107, 151, 152, 171, 176, 195, 207, 208, 209, 217, 312, 382 public art 146, 147, 148 public housing 115 public trust 34, 45, 99, 136, 137, 218, 293, 382 6.0 REFERENCES 285 APPENDIX A► - PROGRESS REPORT ON THE 2000 GENERAL PLAN What has happened since the last General Plan? An important part of this General Plan Update was taking stack of what has happened, and what has not, since the 2000 General Plan. The record on how the County has performed on implementing the 2000 General Plan is mixed. 4' Many actions identified in the X02 Plan have been 3LGGC_ aimplemented, but others have not. Some actions are C no longer relevant clue to changes of circumstance. Some of those attempted did not succeed due =' to alternative political priorities, Others have not been initiated, or are otherwise constrained by available County resources including staffing and r - exhaustive list of planning funding. Below is a no actions identified in the last General Plan that have been attempted, completed, or are currently beings implemented. APPENDIX A - PROGRESS REPORT ON THE 2000 GENERAE_ P-AN I APPENDICES 291 Since County Planning Actions since the 2000 General Plan The many activities taken by the County Planning Staff to implement the 2000 General Plan are listed below. Wel ✓ Identifying Where *__0 Fall Short The events and meetings that have occurred over the past two years to update the General Plan ✓J� 11 ( )r.AIVIen%^C'_P, Agriculutural Cluster NOTE: rem OM space. Subdivision Lateral Shoreline Access (777801) Gated Community Ban AG ADU Sunset (843) Subdivision Traffic Calming Superstore Ban (849) Shoreline Setback Bills (863) NoTE:addspa�es Open District Density Cap (895) Transient Vacation Rental Bills (864,876,904) COMMUNITY PLANNING W Ces +1 ecl indicate that in many areas we have fallen short of our Vision. Participants crippled with these tough questions throughout the process, with few, if any, easy answers. While Kaua'i is still a very beautiful place to be, there continue to be threats to the environment requiring watchful diligence by its citizens and regulation by r Federal, State; and County governments. There is continued degradation of water quality from urban uses, of the soil, and of sacred places (wahi pana) Small Wind Energy Conversion Farm Worker Housing Bill (903) Increase in Zoning Violation Fine (919) Land Coverage Calculation for Shared Use Paths (924) Agriculural Solar Facilities (928) CZO Update (935) Reduce Block Length (946) Homestay (987) Kilauea Town Plan (2005) Uhu'e Civic Center Improvements Master Plan (2008) Lihu'e Town Core Urban Design Plan (2009) East Kaua'i Community Plan (draft, 2015) Lihu'e Community Plan (adopted in 2015) South Kaua'i Community Plan and Form -Based Code (adopted in 2015) FUNCTIONAL PLANS Multimodal Land Transportation Plan (2012) Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan (2009) Water Plan 2020 (2001) Parks Master Plan (2013) Tourism Strategic Plan Update (2016) Important Agricultural Lands Study (2015) Affordable Rental Housing Study Update (2014) Multi- Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan Update (2015) Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Update (2016) 292 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN due to overexposure of humans. The effects of climate change, including sea level rise and extreme weather, among others, heightens the challenges and adds to uncertainty. Kaua'i citizens are serious aboutthe environment. They do notwantto just give i� lip service, they want everyone from individuals to government to be accountable and take real action to protect the aina and the ocean. They are willing to make more personal sacrifices and live with strictly enforced regulations in order to achieve the goal of protecting natural resources and upholding KauaTs natural beauty. douioie.6- For too many residents there are challenges with the affordability of housing. People are double and Jtripled -up, with no hope of either purchasing their own home or finding an affordable rental. Does.. opening up more lands for development bring about the desired outcome of having adequate housing for ' N people to live in? Does relaxing regulatidn to allow,, v for more attached, semi -, detached and other types of units make a measurable difference or does it just reinforce sprawl? These are some of the questions the General Plan sought to address. NOTE: rcw►ovf- spa ce,� Related to this issue is the inadequacy of infrastructure. While there is plenty of water, the facilities to extract it, store it,and transfer it to where it is needed now and into the forseeable future is not there. Recent court cases on the public trust doctrine indicate that a new thinking is required to properly allocate water against all uses. Similarly, solid waste capacity is close to being reached and a new facility is required. Wastewater has challenges, especially for those now being served through septic tanks or cesspools, which are being phased out. Traffic congestion is at the top of everyone's list of issues. It occurs in many places, but it is especially acute through the East Kaua'i District due to having one main travel route, which is the same as the destination road, Kuhio Highway. Peak period coning, a bypass road, and other measures have done little to J relieve congestion. The State does not have sufficient resources at this time to build new roads or widen c roads to provide congestion relief and add capacity. �► The County strategy to address this issue through o mode shift has made few measurable impacts. Too vfew people ride the County bus, ride their bicycle and /orwalkto get around. While developments such o as a TIGER grant in Lihu'e and the island wide transit 2 study are furthering this goal;, it has been frustrating to measure little progress year after year. ��siandwide Finally, there are too many disaffected individuals on Kaua'i.The benefits that come with living in a beautiful place are elusive to people struggling to get by. The presence of homeless, runaways and lost teenagers, and a criminal element is inconsistent with KauaTs social and cultural mores but all too pervasive. The lack of clear strategies, programs and resources to attack such problems frustrates and confuses the population at large. These concerns collectively have led to disenchantment with the planning process and the General Plan itself. What is the point of having lofty goals if we make no progress on them from plan period to plan period? Which of them need to be tackled first? Which problems should get the majority of resources? It isthe premise of the General Plan thatthese issues, while very real, must not dissuade us from holding a forward thinking Vision, setting Goals and policies, and identifying Actions towards realizing our goals. The work of a General Plan, therefore, requires a degree of optimism. We do so in full recognition of the challenges, and with a willingness to improve our accountability and enforce how we measure our progress, whether in small baby steps, or giant strides. The General Plan gives us the beacon for where to travel together. It provides us a way forward to plan Kaua'i Kakou. j NDT6: Yr_mo� APPENDIX A - PROGRESS REPORT ON THE 2000 GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 293 APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN The Approach to this General Plan Introduction Much has changed since the 2000 General Plan was adopted. The process for updating the Plan included looking at what has changed, what has remained the same, and what new issues have emerged since the 2000 General Plan. It required looking at the policies and implementing actions in the 2000 General Plan and working with the various County agencies to take stock of which have been implemented, which have not, and which are no longer relevant and why. It involved commissioning new studies and reviewing data and new information that has become available since the last General Plan. It also involved working closely with the community to take stock of what is most important to their future. Inclusive Collaborative Innovative Action - Driven . - -.,A Goals for the Planning Process The planning process was designed to be inclusive, collaborative, innovative, and action - driven. Inclusive means ensuring that those who are interested in participating in this General Plan are aware of the process, have multiple means to participate, and can access information readily. It means making special efforts to reach traditionally underserved segments of the community and engage people of all ages. Collaborative means providing for all involved to contribute in a meaningful way toward shaping the vision, goals, policies, and actions contained within the General Plan. The community should "see themselves" and their input reflected in the final product. C0w►rn%AY %,I4 4 Mcw16"evs Innovative means applying creativity and flexibility to the planning process. It involves using technology to make participation easier and more appealing. It means consulting current best practices and adapting them to the unique needs of Kaua'i. Action- driven means developing General Plan policies and actions with an emphasis on implementation. It means establishing a shared kuleana for realizing the General Plan Vision, and including meaningful ways to measure progress. Z &45 General Plan Community Meeting in Kapa'a, May 2015 adds: U af-- APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES Project Team & Work Products This General Plan process commenced in the fall of 2014. SSFM International, Inc. served as the lead consultant to the County of Kaua'i Planning Department. SSFM retained several subconsultants to assist with various components of the project. These included Opticos Design' Inc., Economic and Planning Systems, Collaborative Economics, Metroquest, PBR Hawai'i, Charlier and Associates, and Marine and Coastal Solutions International (collectively, the Project Team). The Project Team prepared several technical papers during the course of this General Plan to support development of the vision, policies, and actions. These included: 295 • Updating the Vision for Kaua'i (SSFM, July 2015) • Issues and Opportunities for the Kaua'i 2035 General Plan (SSFM, September 2015) • Adequacy of Future Infrastructure on Kaua'i (SSFM, February 2016) • Summary of Community Place Types and Degree -of- Change Visioning Workshops for the Kaua'i General Plan (Opticos Design;lnc., 2016) 4 Project Team Meeting Baseline Data & Assumptions for Growth General Plan Technical Studies & Key References Six technical reports were prepared prior to beginning this General Plan and were reviewed by a technical advisory committee comprised of community members and agency staff. The purpose of the technical reports were: 1) to document current conditions and needs; 2) to establish projections and assumptions about future growth to be used as a basis for planning; and 3) to provide guidance for incorporating key policy topics into this General Plan. The technical reports are listed below. • Kaua'i 2035 General Plan Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts (SMS Research, February 2014) • County of Kaua'i Important Agricultural Lands Study (University of Hawaii Department of Urban and Regional Planning, August 2015) • Kaua'i Climate Change and Coastal Hazards Assessment (University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program, June 2014) 296 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN • Kaua'i 2035 General Plan Technical Study: Land Use Buildout Analysis (PBR Hawai'i, May 2015) • Kaua'i Community Health Improvement Plan ( Kaua'i Community Health Initiative, June 2014) • 2035 General Plan Kaua'i Infrastructure Analysis (RM Towill, May 2015) Key references arid plans further informed this General Plan: • Community Plans for the Uhu'e District and South Kaua'i District (both adopted in June 2015) • Kaua'i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan (2012) • Kaua'i Tourism Strategic Plan Update (2015) • Kaua'i Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (2016) Functional plans prepared by County and State agencies (Water, Parks and Recreation, etc.) were consulted, as were area - specific studies and master plans. A comprehensive listing of references is included in Chapter 6. Population & Socioeconomic Forecasts The General Plan process produced baseline data and assumptions on how the island is expected to grow over the next 20 years. The Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts (2014) technical report that was prepared for this General Plan provides the basis for growth projections in population, housing, employment, and other demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. A Technical Advisory Committee comprised of community members and agencies was assembled to review and provide input on this and other technical reports for the s General Plan. Appendix C provides an overview of -A the findings. I As shown in the Table below, a great majority of F population growth is planned to occur in the L-ihu'e and South Kaua'i districts (K61oa- Po'ip6- Kal5heo). W The L-ihu'e district had 21.9 percent of KauaTso population in 2010 and is expected to house 26.6 percent in 2035. The K61oa- Po'ipu= `;Kal5heo area had ✓ 17.4 percent of the County population in 2010 and will have up to 18.5 percent on 2035. Policies and actions to address this anticipated growth are reflected in this General Plan, as well as the Community Plans for the Lihu'e and South Kaua'i Districts that were completed and adopted in 2015. The percentage of the County's population in each of the remaining districts will decrease slightly by 2035. The Lihu'e District is expected to absorb nearly half of the island's population growth through 2035, in keeping with the County's policy of designating Lrhu'e as the island's main center of population and employment. Kaua'i County Population, Island wide and By District (1990 -2035) Islahc! -w icl.2_ I V ?U ti 0 4 Approach to Policy Development Policies and actions are included in Chapters 1 and 3. The text box below describes the principles that were followed in developing policies forthis General Plan. Policy Principles • General Plan policies are intentionally high level and general. They provide County agencies with both guidance and flexibility in preparing functional and community plans. • Policies replace the policies in the 2020 General Plan. • Policies provide a framework for actions that can then be prioritized, tracked and measured. Kaua'i County Population, Island --widL and By District (1990 -2035) 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 County of Kaua'i 51,676 58,463 67,091 74,693 83,328 88,013 L7ihu'e 11,169 12,507 14,683 18,017 21,595 23,456 South Kauai 9,600 10,545 11,696 13,623 15,737 16,855 Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele 3,873 4,362 6,157 6,463 6,860 7,094 Waimea - Kekaha 4,698 5,660 5,561 5,901 6,323 6,566 North Shore 5,913 6,605 8,002 8,286 8,686 8,933 East Kaua'i 16,192 18,784 20,992 22,403 24,128 25,110 Source: SMS Research Kauai 2035 General Plan: Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts (2014) Land Use Forecasts Another key technical report prepared to inform the General Plan's growth projections was the Land Use Buildout Analysis (2015). Using the population and housing projections contained in the socioeconomic study,the land use buildoutstudy inventoried existing land use designations and determined whether additional designated lands would be needed to accommodate projected residential, commercial, industrial, resort, and other land uses. The findings of the Land Use Buildout Analysis (2015) are contained in Chapter 2. • Policies are flexible enough to allow for changing information, technology, and circumstances. The approach to developing policies and actions for this General Plan is explained in the diagram below. For each key policy, the Project Team: • Consulted existing policies and considered how they have worked to date • Reviewed current best practices NoTIF makg 444`� t, fey pcl v + 71RW lY rWo • Interviewed agencies to identify policy opportunities • Drafted policies for review and input from the CAC and community • Revised policies based on agency and community Input APPENDIX B -THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 297 Gather Information Incorporate Input Develop Policies Guide Implementation - Plans & policies - Agency interviews - Developed draft - Actions - Best practices - CAC policy discussion policies - Policy Maps - Developments since - Community input -Tested and refined - Prioritization 2000 GP policies with input - Performance'Measures - Policy issues and &,Indicators opportunities Public Process for this General Plan VaTE: rery)"Itr Community input and Comm—u—nIty participation are the foundation to this General Plan Update. Much of the vision, goals, policies, and actions of this update were developed as a result of over 20 months of island -wide public input that were collected throughout the entire General Plan Update process. A major goal of the public engagement process was to reach out to as much people as possible from Hanalei to Kekaha and from keiki to kupuna. There were also special efforts by the team to reach out to new participants and Kauai's youth. In orderto make sure that all Kauai voices were heard and given the opportunity to comment, a robust public engagement process was created that relied on more innovative and creative forms. In addition to holding traditional community meetings in all the planning districts, the team went out into the 61 AZO+ FACEBOOI W1,200 LAND OWNER FANS EMAIL MEETINGS ISUBSCRIBER5 ?87 �C'In4Sa. k 60C 7K USERS 7 COFFEE HOUR TALKS 111L 7 PLANNIING COMMISSION ® 25 MEETINGS L� c —� X36 SMALL GROUP MEETINGS 298 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN MEETING ATTENDEES 35+ PRESENTATIONS 0 v u u 1 r community and held pop -up locations at schools, farm fair, bike path, parks, public libraries, and the farmers market. Further, the use of digital platforms such as our website, email address, online survey, facebook, and Instagram accounts helped to advertise events, provide a convenient forum to provide comments, and reach out to a younger audience. advertisements that were run in local newspapers and publications. In addition, t- shirts, pens, stickers, and water bottles were created with the Kauai Kakou logo as giveaways and prizes for participation. Spreading the Word Website (z) olfcl __,A i,, ,l Use � (I)visiohiv�g, P Draft oui•►^cach. The public engagement process of this General ou +rtcach� avAd (3) piscu5sioV1 Plan Update was broken down into three phases: .1) visioning; 2) policy and land use outreach; 3) KAUAI Discussion Draft outreach. During each of the phases, public engagement efforts were conducted island - wide and at different locations to ensure a diverse range of people participated in the process. During the 20 months of public outreach, the team reached KA U A` I COUNTY GENERAL P LA N over 80,000 people. ■ i ■ i �1 ■ ■ The infographic on the following page shows the general reach of the public process (as of December 2016). It should also be noted that our public engagement process included numerous rounds of meetings with major stakeholders (landowners, agencies, neighborhood association groups, community organizations) at different phases of the public engagement process. The remaining section of this appendix goes into more description and detail aboutthe differenttypes of outreach that was conducted for this update. Who Participated This General Plan process enjoyed a high level of participation. Stakeholders included: Major landowners, government agencies (county, state, federal), community members, non - profit organizations, neighborhood associations, and the youth (elementary, middle school, high school, and college-;aged students). Branding & Identity coi�e�t✓ -aged The first step in making the Update process visible and recognizable was to develop a strong brand identity, complete with a logo and messaging that clearly related the General Plan to people's everyday lives. The theme is "Plan Kaua'i Kakou'; and the logo includes a canoe that symbolizes people working together toward a common goal for the future. Several versions of the logo were developed for different applications. Materials were developed using the brand identity to build awareness and educate people on the GP Update process and how to get involved. This included a fact sheet, postcard, signage, and IJa'1►t,�� The General Plan Update process has had an active presence online since its inception. The website, www.plankauai.com, serves as the central hub for information and updates, which are shared across the County of Kaua'i Planning Department's social media platforms. As of December 2016, there has been 20,703 website views. Social Media KAUA1KM&U The Latest News av� Happenm�s usftwca nifty cwkv wUj" UadwAffmi. Bu%AV& *V Tours &nd ChWmrtbs this November! Candy Seeks Wannedm on Fuhlle Uesetapmnes Hem's Same N,y AWM from the Nown W w Conwnurdty V%kw*q aW NM rypkp WorWW" WL Lti USE The "Latest News" page of the project website, www.plankauai.com Social media was utilized as an engagement tool throughoutthe project. Platforms included the Kaua'i County Planning Department's Facebook page, and APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 299 a dedicated Instagram account for this General Plan ( @plankauai). An official hashtag was developed and promoted, #plankauai. As of December 2016, #plankauai received 229 Instagram likes and had 2,662 facebook followers. E -mail List A list of email contacts was compiled and maintained . over the course of the project. These contacts received e -mail notices of community meetings:;; and workshops, as well as important update announcements. This list was comprised of members of the public who either subscribed via the website or indicated their interest at meetings, and was key in,', the distribution of plan = ;'related updates, meetings,` and events. Mailing list signups were encouraged in print and online media, and at project meetings and events. There were 18 email blasts and 1,308 subscribers as of December 2016. Video A three - minute informational video was produced to introduce the GP Update process, background and history, content topics, importance to policy, and opportunities for public participation. The video included footage of Kaua'i and the public process, and was designed to raise awareness, promote the update process, and encourage public participation. It was posted on the project website, shared on social media, and screened at community meetings. Print Advertising: Newspaper and Advertisements The GP Update process utilized both online and print media advertising to promote public engagement in the process, and to publicize upcoming meetings. These took the form of print media such as notices AGRICULTURE WFRASTRUCTURE GROWTH l� . ,!7 G• NwJ .t,nnn9 Ura+n R�nl ::3d Rkl S,tff: SJltf AlT! IIDJl N7M!'9L70L � �c..r)1.:I -.J_O Print advertisement designed forth e 035 General Plan,,,, G,ta : U cL+e, 300 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN NOTE: remotes and ads in The Garden Island, Kaua'i Magazine, d Kaua'i Family Magazine, Elder Resource Magazine, E and Midweek Kaua'i. Event flyers and notices were;,, also distributed at commercial retail centers and :Z public offices. Online notices included postings on the websites and online calendars of•Malama Kaua'i, ✓ Kaua'i Planning & Action Alliance, Heartbeat of Kaua'i, and Kaua'i Festivals, as well as regular event notices and updates on the Kaua'i GP Update project website. As of December 2016, there has been 10 newspaper articles and ads on the General Plan. Media Campaign Several news releases were distributed by the Kaua'i Mayor's Office to all major local news outlets. New releases announced the launch of the project, promoted community events, and invited participation and input. Members of the Garden k// Island newspaper regularly attended and reported on community events and Citizen Advisory Committee meetings. As of December 2016 there has been nine press releases. Employee,5 7 he. tgl�� Planning Department looks for input on future developments V4E- MaMro pMfaMR.NlWy MANY ►lYl1 iMIM•.'YM.OY•YMNt,MMTM ,ww,a.pwbw.+"asarm.rnrnala,. lAtl(SOlIVILLE MVERIYAUC ® . oil Ow ranaw.x�f.aa.fr. r.r.aa.aaaaae.....rosr+.w + aa.w b ■7r1�s� �� amFw.laa... NEOhagnn HVDADW Homy! HVDfq..f1»wfs �7EYIU iMf 91[_.__ ■ Fieuppm PfeDNWaff Law fsilOp so Hl00 AID $7,000 72ADD,LA". �. ..nw•.t ;+rc.:..a.. «-w Planning Department looks for input on future developments V4E- MaMro pMfaMR.NlWy MANY ►lYl1 iMIM•.'YM.OY•YMNt,MMTM ,ww,a.pwbw.+"asarm.rnrnala,. lAtl(SOlIVILLE MVERIYAUC September 25, 2015 news article in The Garden Island publicizing the County's call for landowner participation and input on future develop- ments. ranaw.x�f.aa.fr. r.r.aa.aaaaae.....rosr+.w + aa.w b .aa.,la,PfwN.arr.fa,p1WS _ . uR�+. �w .rMx.Mwvarwvr.wwulw+wrrwir.s,r Hwrrrwrwr �7EYIU iMf 91[_.__ rwwwaonfr uru„Or.fWV,.ao.wr aY�+.a ur•..wae.s+a.w . �. �^ �:' MNM •1YWN/�i�YMrA1101i]It�Opfwrai;. y:, -1._._ September 25, 2015 news article in The Garden Island publicizing the County's call for landowner participation and input on future develop- ments. Opportunities for Citizen Input and Participation This General Plan included a robust public engagement program that sought to engage the community through multiple formats over the course of the General Plan update. These included a variety of face -to -face meetings and workshops, digital engagement platforms, and youth arts and education outreach. These are illustrated in the graphic below and described in the following pages. FACE-TO -FACE ENGAGEMENT the Acknowledgements at the beginning of this document. The role of the CAC was to: • Identify useful information and sources • Participate in community events and advise on community and stakeholder engagement • Help to distribute information and get the word out about this General Plan process • Review the draft plan and policies and provide input in an advisory capacity Citizen Advisory Committee The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for this General Plan is an advisory group that represents various geographic areas and interest groups across the island. The members were selected by the Mayor and represented a diversity of viewpoints and stakeholders. CAC members are listed in CAC meetings convened in March 2015. The CAC had 17 meetings on General Plan Policy Topics over the course of the project. In addition, the CAC participated in three workshops to reviewthe policies, land use maps, and actions of the Draft General Plan. The Table below lists the topics and chronology for each CAC meeting. CAC meetings were open to the APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 301 o V CAC Schedule Mtg # Month/Year Topics Covered 1 March 2015 CAC Kickoff and Introduction to the 2 April 2015 Demographic and Socioeconomic Data 3 July 2015 Proposed Vision for Kaua'i 2035 4 July 2015 Place Typing & Form - Based Code _. 5 September 2015 Status of 2000 General Plan Implementation Land Use Buildout 6 October 2015 Natural, Historic,'& Cultural Resources 7 November 2015 Economic Development 8 January 2016 Mid - Project Re -cap, Place T and Land Use 9 February 2016 Infrastructure 10 February 2016 Tourism 11 April 2016 Agriculture 12 May 2016 Transportation 13 June 2016 Housing and Social Equity 14 August 2016 Draft Plan Policies Land Use Maps . 15- September 2016 Review of Draft Plan 16 Actions 17 December 2016 Review CAC and Community Input on the Draft Plan public, and time was allocated for public comment during each meeting. Public participation in CAC meetings increased throughoutthe process, typically drawing between 20 and 50 people from across the island. County and State agency representatives also attended and participated in CAC meetings. 302 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Small Group Meetings with Community Organizations and Groups The County of Kaua'i Planning Department conducted small group meetings with 34 community organizations during this General Plan. These meetings were all one -on -one meetings. Small group meetings were announced twice during the process, in May 2015 and August 2016. Requests for presentations or participation in board meetings were accepted throughout the planning process as well. The intent of the sessions was to apprise community groups of this General Plan process and gather input on the major issues and concerns for each group's constituents. Groups consulted are listed to the right- CAC Meeting #11, Uhu'e, April 2016 Pop -up Events County of Kaua'i Planners conducted a "Pop -Up Week" and deployed a traveling tent with interactive displays at various locations around the island from May 1 -8, 2015. Planners talked with community members and collected input through discussion and comment boards where participants could place post -it notes with ideas and visions for Kauai. The intent of Pop -Up Week was to reach people that may not have otherwise heard about or engaged in the planning process, by bringing the planning process to communities and neighborhoods. There were a total of 12 pop -up events atthefollowing locations: Kaua'i Museum, Kaua'i Community Market at Kaua'i Community College, Koloa Sunshine Market, Kealia Market, Kalaheo Sunshine Market, Kapa'a Sunshine Market, Truck Stop Thursday in L-ihu'e, Hanap6p6 Art Night, Hofgaard Park in Waimea, Ke Ala Hele Makalae coastal path, L-ihu'e Civic Center, and Princeville Library. NOTE= rey-nove, bu Ite f; make 4-4tei Sfylr_, v1 C Community Organizations Consulted • Apollo Kaua'i ✓ Kaua'i Chamber of Commener • Hale Halawai • Kaua'i Path • Hanalei Watershed Hui • Kaua'i Planning and Action Alliance • Hanapepe Community Association • Kekaha Community Association • Hawaiian Islands Land Trust V Malama Kaua'i • Kaua'i Endangered Seabird Recovery Project • Malama Mahaulepu` • Kaua'i Forest Bird Recovery Project • Na Lei Wili a' • Kaua'i Seabird Habitat Conservation Program • National Tropical Botanical Garden • Kaua'i Community Health Alliance V • Phi Theta Kapaa ( Kaua'i Community College) • Kaua'i County Sub -Area Health Planning Council • Princeville at Hanalei Community Association • Kaua'i Filipino Chamber of Commerce • Save Our Shearwaters • Kaua'i Filipino Council • Sierra Club • Kaua'i North Shore Community Foundation • Wailua- Kapa'a Neighborhood Association • Kaua'iWatershed Alliance add '5p ac • Zonta Club ✓ • Kaua'i Board of Realtors, a� • Kaua'i Nene Habitat Conservation Plan • Get Fit Kaua'i • L-ihu'e Business Association Child rev% (PATGH) • Surfrider Foundation Farm Fair The County set up a booth at the 2015 Kaua'i Farm Responses from residents during Pop -,up Week V Fair to collect input on the draft Vision over a three —� day period. A display included statements from the draft Vision and participants were asked to vote for their highest priorities. There was over 100 people that visited the booth. Community -Wide Meetings APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 303 �. County of Kaua'i Display at the 2014 Kaua'i Farm Fair to seek input on the Lihu'e and South Kaua'i Community Plan Updates. C Project Kick -Off Meetings (May 2015) Community meetings were held at Neighborhood Centers in each of Kaua'i's six planning districts duringthe month of May2015 (seetabletothe right). These meetings were intended to familiarize the community with this General Plan process and invite input on key issues and policy elements of the plan. Presentations included information on population projections and other data being used to inform this General Plan. The meetings used discussion, polling, interactive display boards, and written comments as mechanisms for collecting input. Attendees were polled on top issues facing the island today. They also revisited the 2000 General Plan Vision statement APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 303 and were asked to assess its relevance and how far the County had come in achieving it. Community Place Typing and Visioning Date Community May 14, 2015 Waimea May 15, 2015 Koloa May 16, 2015 Lihu'e May 21, 2015 Kapa'a May 22, 2015 Hanapepe May 23, 2015 Kilauea Workshops (November 2015 and April 2016) Place types for the Lihu'e and South Kaua'i Districts were taken from the recently completed Community Plans for both districts. The remaining four districts of Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele, East Kaua'i, Waimea - Kekaha, and North Shore determined place types for each main community through community place- typing and visioning workshops. Each workshop began with a presentation explaining place types and how they are utilized in developing General Plan visions, land use designations, and policies. It also presented baseline information on population projections for each district, planned and entitled developments, and the district vision \/ contained in the 2020 General Plan. The Project Team started by suggesting a place type based on the size of the community and place type category descriptions contained in Chapter2: rural crossroads, village, small town, or large town. Community members were asked at the beginning and end of the workshop to confirm whether or not this place type was accurate to describe the community today. They were also asked whether the community would remain as it is today, or undergo a transition. This future change was articulated as each community's "degree of change." Determining degree of change helps to articulate how much change is appropriate in different places on Kaua'i in order to achieve the visions for each community on the island. Three degrees of change were identified in the Kaua'i General Plan workshops to describe community visions: • Minimal Change, for a place that is maintained• • Incremental Change, for a place that allows for change overtime and evolves,; and,` , • (Lransformational. Change, for a place that encourages significant change to occur. To determine each community's desired degree of change, Degree of Change was assessed by reviewing existing data and plans for each area and asking community members: How will your community change to reflect your vision for it? Will it be: • a place that experiences minimal change and is maintained? • a place that allows for incremental change overtime and evolves? • a place that encourages significant changes to occur and transforms? In order to determine the desired degree of Community Meeting in Kapa'a, May 2015 304 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Community Meeting, Hanapepe May 2015 r s s t r � N � Attendees of the North Shore Bus Tour in Princeville. change for each community, the workshops asked participants to respond with impressions and ideas about specific changes to the following character components of their community: • Site Frontages: How do structures address the street? • Parking: Where is parking primarily located? Opticos Design arking up preliminary land use maps based on input. rY%0Lr{c.iv C3 —up building height (in stories)? What is a desirable scale and character? • Destinations and Amenities: Does the center draw people because of its uses or character? The table below provides examples of strategies that illustrate minimal, incremental, and transformative degrees of change. Examples of Strategies for Minimal Change Examples of Strategies for Incremental Change Examples of Strategies for Transformative Change (;Occasional infill of vacant lots '- Encourage infill of vacant and - Encourage infill of vacant and �ccasional redevelopment of p under - utilized lots im � xed -uses under - utilized lots_ use, ,...: dilapidated properties - Encourage mixed -use and - Encourage mixed u`se and - Minor improvements to the medium - density where medium - density where public realm appropriate appropriate - Improvements to public Realm - Redevelop existing opportunity NoTe: unify -Fvvna.+ - Upgrade infrastructure sites ( sQace)(dasl��(spacc�(Cov�4ev� +) j - Maximize mobility and links to r�`�,,,� transit ve i - Transformational' Improvements to public realm - Major infrastructure upgrades • Pedestrian Facilities: What is pedestrians' comfort in using streets? Are community facilities well- connected by pedestrian routes? • Right- Sizing the Center: Is there a defined central gathering place for the community? • Building Intensity: Is the size of the center appropriate for its uses? • Infrastructure and Services: What is the typical This information was documented in presentations and mapsthatwere shared with community members in a closing presentation. The findings formed the basis of Place Typing and Community Vision memos, and preliminary land use maps for each district that were further refined during this General Plan process. The dates and locations of the place- typing and visioning workshops are included in the table on the following page. APPENDIX B -THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 305 V Date Activities Location 11/02/2015 Group Visioning and Bus / Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele Walking Tour 11/03/2015 Group Visioning and Bus/ Waimea and Kekaha Walking Tour 11/04/2015 Draft Land Use Concepts for Waimea Waimea and Kekaha 11/04/2015 Draft Land Use Concepts for Hanapepe Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele 11/05/2015 Group Visioning and Bus/ Kilauea, Princeville, and Hanalei Walking Tour 11/06/2015 Draft Land Use Concepts for Princeville Kilauea, Princeville, and Hanalei 04/28/2016 Group Visioning and Bus / Wailua, Kapa'a, and Anahola Walking Tour waii\Ack 04/28/2016 Mapping Exercise for(Wailua, Kapa'a Kapa'a, and Anahola 04/28/2016 Draft Land Use Concepts for Kapa'a Wailua, Kapa'a, and Anahola V�Ia►lua Discussion Draft Open Houses (November and December 2016) There was six community open house events. The purpose of each event was to present the discussion draft plan and encourage input during the public review period, which was extended until December 2016. These meetings were held in an open house format and included agencies, stakeholders, and community members that were instrumental in developing the plan. There was a total of 239 attendees at the final six community open house events. The dates and locations of the open houses are described in the table on the following page. Agency Coordination There were three rounds of opportunities for agencies to provide comments on the General Plan. In addition, agencies were kept informed of updates on the General Plan process through emails, press releases, and several presentations to the KCTcabinet team. Agencies were invited to CAC meetings and workshops, as well as public meetings. The table below describes the engagement included in each of the three rounds of agency engagement. 306 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Landowner Meetings From September 2015 to November 2016, 19 landowner meetings were held, including 15 landowner participants. Landowner meetings were held in three rounds. In each round, invitations were sent via certified mail to large landowners likely to the affected by Future Land Use Map changes. V The first two rounds, which included 17 meetings, allowed landowners to engage in the General Plan process. The first round was held during September 2015, and the second round was held July 2016. The last round, which included two meetings during Coffee Hour Talk, LThu'e District Date Open House # Location 11/09/2016 Open House #1 Lihu'e 11/10/2016 Open House #2 Kilauea 11/14/2016 Open House #3 Hanapepe 11/15/2016 Open House #4 Kapa'a 12/05/2016 Open House #5 Waimea 12/06/2016 Open House #6 Princeville November 2016, allowed landowners to come to the planning department to discuss proposed changes and provide comments for the public review period. Coffee Hour Talks There was a total of six coffee hour talks held at HA Coffee Bar in Lihu'e, from January to June 2016. The purpose of Coffee Hour Talks were to continue the conversation on different topics from the General Plan CAC meetings. Coffee Hour Talks allowed CAC members and the public to talk story about planning issues on Kaua'i. Issues that were discussed included land use maps, infrastructure, tourism, agriculture, transportation, and housing. There were 3 -4 people who attended each event, with a total of 18 attendees. DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT Instagram Contests were Two community -wide Instagram contests ihave bee -n held for the GP Update. One coincided with Plan Kaua'i Pop -Up Week, and the second was launched during the Community Meetings. The first contest challenged users to find the Plan Kaua'i pop -up tent, talk with County planners, and post a photo with hashtags #findtheplanners and #planKauai. The second contest invited community members to post photos that represent their vision for Kaua..'1 and to ✓ tag #myKauaivision. Agency Coordination Round 1 - The Project team met with individual agencies to gather input on the infrastructure Late 2015 report as well as the Issues and Opportunities Paper. Round 2 - Meetings were focused on Health and all policies, but were intended to encourage July 14 -15, 2016, cross sector collaboration. Appx. 20 agencies participated in workshops on the L-ihu'e Civic Center following topics: 1. Active Living 2. Healthy Eating and Food Environment 3. Healthy and Safe Housing and Economic Development 4. Climate Change and Health Round 3 - Appx. 30 agencies were notified to participate in (ar NOT-6: Kccp cc'Hfc►nt -f O�jC-F'L1�V' November 2016 open houses and agency meetings. The open house was held on November 23rd, and 4 -5 agencies attended. Two agency meetings were held on November 28111 and 30th. Members from the following agencies attended these meetings:,1) Water 2) Housing 3) Civil Defense / EMA 4) DOH- astewater and 5) OED. ulh L,, KEMA� NorE: revnove, space, APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 307 An entry in the #mykauaivision Instagram contest Survey on Draft Policies (September 2016) An online survey was developed and deployed during the month of September 2016. The purpose L, of the survey was to: ,1) Share the draft policies; . '.2) Determine whether the community at large agreed or disagreed with each policy, 3) Find out whether they felt that the policies as a whole captured their concerns for the future of Kauai; and, . 4) Identify any gaps or missing elements in the policy statements. More than 1,000 responses were received. Results indicated strong agreement with the policies shown. Nearly 80% of respondents indicated they believe the policies captured what they thought was important (6.4% said they did not, and 14.8% were undecided). Additional details on respondents by demographics I,/ and geographic location are shown in the text box. Total responses: 1,018 �Ic>vj Geographic Location (sorted from most to least respondents): • East Kaua'i: 327 (33.4 %) • South Kaua'i: 192 (19.6 %) • Lihu'e: 169 (17.3 %) • North Shore: 160 (16.4 %) • Waimea - Kekaha 56 (5.7 %) • Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele: 55 (5.6 %) • 4 respondents do not live on Kaua'i 308 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN M Winner of the #findtheplanners Instagram contest, @beaubasaur Demographics • Respondents had a 6:4 ratio of Women:Men • Respondents were from all age groups. Largest number were from 50 -65 (35.2 %) and second highest from 35 -49 (26 %) • 85 keiki ages 8 -10 completed the survey • Most respondents have lived on Kaua'i for till 0 years or more (47.4% more than 10 years; 28.1 % born on Kaua'i) d oiv+. con Ecv�f NOTE: Yamo b b 4+ J The policy statement "Protect KauaTs scenic beauty' receivedthe most support, with 93.8 %of respondents indicating agreement or strong agreement. The policy statement "Uphold Kaua'i as a unique visitor destination" received the least support, with 13.7% disagreeing. However, 78.2% of respondents agreed with the statement. The policies where respondents most indicated needing more information included: "Design healthy and complete neighborhoods "; "Build a balanced transportation system "; and "Help agricultural lands be productive ". When asked "What's missing from the policies? Are there any you would add ? ", some themes emerged from the input: • Carrying capacity: Respondents indicated that the concept that the island has limited capacity for growth needed to come across more strongly. • Sustainability: Respondents expressed interest in supporting more bike paths and preserving nature. • Development: Many respondents asked for language that proposed different ✓✓ V ways of limiting development or stopping development completely. There was also a desire for more accountability to ensure that developments are consistent with Community Plans and provide benefit to the community. In contrast to this view, some respondents indicated that they wanted affordable housing - related development or wanted the County to embrace growth. Agricultural Uses: Some respondents asked that policies include stopping or limiting the use of agricultural land for genetically modified organism (GMO) crops or pesticide testing. small—scale. Small farmers: People asked for incentives to encourage small scale farming, including allowing farm housing on agricultural lots. Alternative Visitor Accommodations. There was a clear split between those seeing bed a and breakfast,(B &B)'s and transient vacation U > rentals (TVR)'s as an income - generating activityU that should be allowed versus those that feel it takes needed housing out of the market and increases the cost of living. • Education: Respondents felt setting goals for education were important. vv • Drugs and Community Safety: Some indicated they would like to see policies address these topics. The input collected was valuable in confirming the policy statements and informed the development of the actions included in Chapter 3. Issues and Opportunities Paper ' The Issues and Opportunities paper addressed the following policy areas: 1) Kaua'i Kakou 2) Growth Management and Land Use 3) Economic Development 4) Agricultural Lands 5) Tourism 6) Open Space 7) Affordable and Workforce Housing 8) Climate Change and Natural Hazards 9) Infrastructure and Public Services 10) Multimodal Land Transportation 11) Energy 12) Public Health 13) Cultural and Heritage Resources 14) Natural Resource Management and Conservation 15) Parks and Recreation Fiscai 16) Government Operations and<Fiscal`e Management For each policy area the paper addressed the primary issues, and the opportunities that exist for the General Plan to address. The final report was released in September 2015. The report was made available via the General Plan website, and was sent to CAC members. Community Voices from the Survey "Designate areas for future residential growth within each planning region. Provide the necessary infrastructure to support areas of future growth." "Help small farmers. Assist in distribution of local produce /products so that retailers can order as easily and reliably as they do from off - island." "Find some way to house every person living on the island who wants to be housed." "We need to educate our children more about the drugs around Kauai and the choices they can make to have a healthy and happy life." "Complete streets needs to be retroactively applied to all main thoroughfares in Kauai neighborhoods such as Kuamo'o St and Kamalu Rd." APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 309 YOUTH ENGAGEMENT THROUGH ARTS & schools across the island participated, and winners EDUCATION were announced in June 2015. The theme was "I Love rimy Community Because.." Entries demonstrated ✓ A special emphasis was placed on ensuring the What keiki treasure about Kaua'i today and what they voice of Kaua i s youth is reflected in the plan. Input would like to see in the future. from youth, from elementary to college students, was obtained throughout the planning process, and is described below. Top 5 themes Elementary School Outreach Keiki Art Contest More than 300 entries were received for an elementary school level Keiki Art Contest that ran from April 1 -May 22, 2015. Twelve public and private " 1w, romvld ft WC, TC4A = ofl IIaaa+ becrausP,,' \'< atQerd °, rx, uDn�t� �h:e buy \d��rq_ V ate. �,le r;ould puk avv 6 she w0mo \n a 501m qw. 1a; \nlp. , iA h\w V\0(" NUCA5. (, W: ;h)O\ A )(A`1f, '�` 1�aa,'\ ,n�: ' \n1 a b13 aria �, �hc� bt'G�U1d �c � �\a7> �Q11 bttpu5e ea�Y, �.Z� 5houd b>✓ Qrlao where 1601 6�0� Wlae Wi11 go }hevC �IC`iy�� \�C om� a!� �: ; �,r, •.xe��r,d ..rte. r....wr.r M Orb kftM WL A� 4 Poster for the "I Love I• Community Because" Keiki Art Contest My 310 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 1. Recreation 2. Nature 3. Development 4. Community /People 5. Sustainability N oTE : rem ove space, V Top 5 - themes 1. Recreation 2. Nature y Z., ,4%4 6koc0�0- 3. Development 'awn +. +r'+'•M artiers#''f VM 4. Community/ People �• " Ac 5. Sustainability b. . Mayor Bernard Carvalho with the winner of the Keiki Art Contest, a 4th Grader at Kapa'a Elementary School What Kaua'i's Keiki Value wife t'v✓0 Sq,aurC I � l i ina re po -t-K5 r�J < 1 1 1L.J IRS, s eIse v i r 1 1� O O O ae 0 V O �FVD More than 300 entries in the Keiki Art Contest depicted why the children of Kaua'i love their community, and what they would like to see in the future. The key themes emerged as: ✓ Recreation= People enjoying nature at the beach, mountains, and ocean ✓ Nature= Kauai's beauty VVV' Development= zoos, housing, parks, commercial, fun activities, bike paths / sidewalks /crosswalks ✓✓ Community/'People- Family and friends spending time together NVTE: remove space, V/%/ Sustainability- gardens, recycling NoTE: / o� Space-, APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 311 NOTE: L.04Y S+yle--1 �ccn ��(sPa[���ala5%��SPaGC�(Cor� i� Middle & High School Outreach Career Day County Planning Staff presented at a Career Day event at Chiefess Kamakahelei Middle School in October of 2015. Middle School Planning Curriculum The County Planning Department began working with The Learning Coalition (TLC) in Honolulu and the State Department of Education in the fall of 2015 to develop a classroom curriculum about Community Planning, including the General Plan. As part of this effort, an instructor at Chiefess Kamakahelei Middle School formed a Junior Planner Club. County Planning Department Staff made a presentations to the club and engaged them in an activity on this General Plan process. High School Outreach During December 2016 the County Planning Department engaged with 135 highschool students at three highschools, Kaua'i High School, Waimea High School, and Kapa'a High School. The County Planning Department shared discussion draft General Plan actions for housing, transportation, and climate change. At Waimea High School, the planning staff conducted a presentation specific to the watershed topic, and land use proposals for the West Side. High school students shared their input and also provided written comments to be used as public record for the public comment period. High school students present their ideas on the General Plan, Decem- ber2016 E- `nails 312 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN NOTE: ►�+[mot�e.. Boys & Girls Club /eIemzn-Fary n `The County Planning Department assisted Over ✓✓ 100 elemantary, middle, and high school students ✓ participate in the General Plan policy survey. While some students took the the survey online, the majority of students completed the paper survey. A summary of the policy survey can be found in section 1.3 of the General Plan. Kaua'i Community College Outreach County Planning staff has engaged Kauai ✓✓ Community College (KCC) throughout the General Plan Process through several venues: a presentation to faculty, presentations and meetings with classes, and meetings with the student life and student government organizations. ;County Planning staff has engaged Kaua'i as well as students and staff through a presentation to'faculty, presentations and meetings with classes, the student organization, and student government The primary issues of interest among students and .Q_ faculty were affordable housing, sustainability and �' food security, preserving open space and rural character, and public access to recreational places. In December 2016, a pop -up event was held at the L Student Life Lounge for students to provide input on the discussion draft. It is estimated that over 100 0 students and faculty participated in the General Plan Process between September 2015- ;December 2016. The table to the right lists the outreach events ✓ conducted at KCC. oVn +k-e, hex+ p0.9G How Input Was Used Inputfrom community members, local organizations, and government agencies provided grounded framing to this General Plan process. It helped to determine whatwas relevant, what needed updating, and what new issues or opportunities are emerging. This General Plan Project Team developed a system for comment tracking and sorting early in the planning process so that comments could be saved, referenced, and cross - referenced to key policytopics. Sources of community input were drawn from: • Written and verbal comments at CAC Meetings, community meetings, and community "Pop -up" Events ✓V/ • mails sent by 'community members to the ankauai @kauai ov e -mail address • Comments received by mail /107E: GIIVLk oCC c010K 4D 614ck, Kaua'i Community College Outreach Month/Year Event June 2015 Small group presentation to Phi Theta a a August 2015 Presentation to Student government KApP°1 September 2015 Presentation to a`'changing world classes September 2015 Meeting with student activists November 2015 Presentation to philosophy class May 2016 Presentation to sustainability class October 2016 Presentation to GIS class October 2016, December 2016 General Plan presentation to sustainability class November 2016 Presentation at KCC Biological Science Week December 2016 Pop -up event at KCC Student Life • Submissions to the project website comment form • Notes from small group meetings with community organizations • Comments, writing, and artwork from youth participants All comments received through the website, e -mail, and social media were transcribed and compiled in a public comment matrix that was made available on the project website and periodically updated. More than 120 comments were received and compiled in the public comment matrix as of September 2016. These are in addition to the many comments received and recorded at CAC meetings and community events. Comments received through all platforms were sorted into files by issue or policy topic to be referenced during the preparation of this General Plan. Developing the General Plan Vision The Vision for Kaua'i was developed and refined with extensive input from the community and CAC. The update of the General Plan Vision involved asking the community for their views on where Kaua'i is today, whether the vision from 2000 remains relevant, and how Kaua'i has been doing as a County and community in realizing the vision. Confirming the key issues and opportunities that should drive policies moving forward, and going out to communities to envision how they see themselves changing and which elements are most important to preserve. The Vision for Kaua'i was a major focus of community outreach for this General Plan. Community members were asked to revisit the Vision Statement from the 2000 General Plan, provide input on its continued relevance, and suggested changes to adapt it to Kaua'i today. Comments were received from a wide variety of sources, including polls, community meetings, CAC discussions, small group meetings, e -mail comments, and comments received during the Kaua'i Farm Fair and Pop -up Week. The great I/ majority of participants polled formally and informally indicated that they felt the existing Vision for Kaua'i 2020 was mostly or partially accurate, but needed some updating in order to reflect the community's vision and values. Very few felt that the statement should either be accepted or rejected in its entirety. Approach to Updating the Vision • Key statements and ideas from the 2000 General Plan that continue to resonate strongly have been preserved. • For those statements that the community felt needed updating, the revised language preserves some of the same thoughts and organizational structure, but updates it with words and concepts that better capture the community sentiment. • New ideas that were missing from the 2000 General Plan were added to existing statements where possible, and crafted into to new statements where appropriate. People were also asked how successful Kaua'i has been in implementing the Vision of the 2000 General Plan. Most gave low marks on where Kaua'i is today with regards to achieving the vision, and asked that this General Plan strengthen accountability for implementation. A draft Vision was prepared based on this initial input, using the approach described --in the text -box at right. It was presented to the CAC and the APPENDIX B - THE APPROACH & PUBLIC PROCESS TO DEVELOP THIS GENERAL PLAN I APPENDICES 313 community and made available online. The draft Vision was also presented in small group meetings with County agencies and community groups, and at the 2015 Kaua'i Farm Fair, where participants were asked to vote for their highest priority statement. Vision statement review at the Kaua'i Farm Fair was done over a three'day process during August; 2015 NUTS: removes comr"A in LTu'e. The resulting input was used to refine the Vision that approves the Draft Plan. 1 +k Yee - alcay 314 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX C - GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS Introduction This Appendix sum marizestheSocioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts (2014) tech nicaI reportthat was prepared for this General Plan and provides the basis for growth projections in population, housing, employment, and other demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. A Technical Advisory Committee comprised of community members and agencies was assembled to review and provide input on this and other technical reports for the General Plan. The following Sections provide an overview of the findings. Another key technical report prepared to inform the General Plan's growth projections was the Land Use BuildoutAnalysis (2015). Using the population and housing projections contained in the socioeconomic study, the land use buildout study inventoried existing land use designations and determined whether additional designated lands would be needed to accommodate projected residential, commercial, industrial, resort, and other land uses. How the 2000 General Plan Handled Growth Projections Projections for growth contained in the 2000 Kaua'i General Plan were derived from two technical studies: one that examined future trends based on projections of existing data from the State Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT), and a second that presented alternative, value- driven growth projections reflecting a significantly lower growth rate. The alternative projections used the visitor population as "the most important factor in estimating KauaTs future economy and population ". The projections in these two studies were presented in the 2000 General Plan as "high" and "low" growth projections for resident population, average daily visitor census, total population, and jobs. The projections were not intended to serve as targets or limits to growth, but as tools for forecasting land supply and infrastructure needs. Na l'E: r&M ova 5Pacf-, Figure 1. Actual Vs. Projected Population Growth (1998- .2010) 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 58,463 55,000 - - - - -- -- 62,863 - 67i226- 75,088 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N lD t0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O tD t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-i I--' I-i F-► F� F-' N F-� N F-► N Alk t!1 01 V 00 tD O 1-+ N W V1 01 V M W O —*—Actual Population — General Plan (low) General Plan (high) DBEDT (new) APPENDIX C -GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS I APPENDICES 315 Population Trends and Projections The total population for the County of Kauai is Trends ®ince the 2000 General Plan projected to increase from 67,091 in 2013 to S 88,013 in 2035. That represents a total growth n of 31.2% between 2010 and 2035, or about As shown in the Figure below, the actual rate of =,, 1.10% per year. population growth since the last count in 2010 has closely followed the "high" growth projection rate SMS Research Kaua'i 2035 General Plan: in the 2000 General Plan. The "high" projection was 3 Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts (2014) based on a linear projection of population data from DBEDT. s Table 1 and Figure 3 show the population forecastfor Sources of Growth - � the County of Kaua'i through 2035. The line in Figure The graph in Figure 2 shows sources of population � Dtracks the population, while the bars indicate the change on Kaua'i between 2000 and 2012. Y annual population growth rate. The model assumed Over the past 15 years, the population growth due a moderate growth rate of 1.10% per year between 2010 and 2035. to natural increase (rate of births - deaths) has greatly exceeded the contribution of migration. ✓County -Wide Projections The County population forecast was developed as a linear projection from the last recorded population data released by the State Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (State of Hawai'i Data Book, 2013). Historical data was taken from the State of Hawai'i Data Book published annually by the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (State of Hawai'i Data Book, 2013). Figure 2. Components of Population Change (2000 -2012) 1,500 1,000 c 0 500 c� 0 0 Births De al -500 -1,000 Natural Intl. ■ r I Dom. Migration Growth Change Migration Migration 2000 -2010 ■ 2010 -2012 *Bars for-2000-2010 and 2010 -2012 show average change per year. 316 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Table 1. Kaua'i County Population (1990 -2035) Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 County of Kaua'i 51,676 58,463 67,091 74,693 83,328 88,013 Average,- Annual 1.24% 1.39% 1.08% 1.10% 1.10% Growth-Rate 0 2.0% NorE: un WY spca cik):q Figure 3. Kaua'i County Population (1990 -2035) 100,000 3.5% APPENDIX C - GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS j APPENDICES 317 90,000 3.0% 80,000 70,000 2.5% c Q) *' ° 60,000 0 2.0% � 0 50,000 3 0 CL 40,000 1.5% j c 30,000 o 1.0% a 20,000 0.5% 10,000 I ■' 0 0.0% CP c � �� �� �� � � � ti� �ocA �o� �o�° ti��� ti��� ti��� ti��� ti�y� ti��� -P, �Countyof Kaua'i Growth - CountyofKaua'i APPENDIX C - GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS j APPENDICES 317 C4- H 0 W 2 Population Projections by Planning District As shown on Table 2 and Figure 4, a great majority of population growth is planned to occur in the Lihu'e and South Kaua'i districts (Koloa- Po'ipu- Kalaheo). The Lihu'e district had 21.9 percent of KauaTs population in 2010 and is expected to house 26.6 percent in 2035. The Koloa- Po'ipu *alaheo area had 17.4 percent of the County population in 2010 and will have up to 18.5 percent on 2035. Policies and actions to address this anticipated growth are reflected in the Community Plans for the Lihu'e and South Kaua'i Districts that were completed and adopted in 2015. The percentage of the County's population in each of the remaining districts will decrease slightly by 2035. The Lihu'e District is expected to absorb nearly half of the island's population growth through 2035, in keeping with the County's policy of designating Lihu'e as the island's main center of population and employment. =slav-J- W icie. ✓ Table 2. Kaua'i County Population,!Island wideL and By District (1990 -2035) M 0 i a 0 JJ was higher than the high estimate predicted in the last General Plan. However, the rate of job growth, indicated by the slope of the lines on the graph, is closer to the low estimate contained in the 2000 General Plan. This slower rate of growth means that if the 2000 GP estimates are projected beyond 2020, the job numbers would likely to be closer to the low estimate provided in the 2000 General Plan. County Wide Job Projections According to the 2014 Socioeconomic Analysis and Forecasts technical report prepared for the GP Update, average annual job growth for the County of Kaua'i is expected to equal 0.79% between 2015 and 2020. Between 2020 and 2030, job growth is expected to occur at an average annual rate of 0.66 %. The rate is expected to dip again to 0.53% during the period between 2030 and 2035, adding less than 1,000 jobs. Economic opportunity is a key issue for Kaua'i moving forward, to ensure that KauaTs residents not only have access to jobs, but can earn a living wage that can support housing and transportation needs. Job Projections by Planning District The Lihu'e Planning District has historically been the main job center on Kaua'i. With the policy to direct the majority of future growth to Lihu'e, that trend is expected to continue for the next 20 years, with Year 1 1990 2 2000 2 2010 2 2020 2 2030 2 2035 County of Kaua'i 5 51,676 5 58,463 6 67,091 7 74,693 8 83,328 8 88,013 Lihu'e 1 11,169 1 12,507 1 14,683 1 18,017 2 21,595 2 23,456 South Kaua'i 9 9,600 1 10,545 1 11,696 1 13,623 1 15,737 1 16,855 Hanapepe- ;.''Ele'ele 3 3,873 4 4,362 6 6,157 6 6,463 6 6,860 7 7,094 Waimea - Kekaha 4 4,698 5 5,660 5 5,561 5 5,901 6 6,323 6 6,566 North Shore 5 5,913 6 6,605 8 8,002 8 8,286 8 8,686 8 8,933 East Kaua'i 1 16,192 1 18,784 2 20,992 2 22,403 1 1 24,128 2 25,110 or the 2000 General Plan The 2000 General Plan used a high and low estimate for jobs, as a factor of population growth. Figure 5 shows that number of actual jobs on Kaua'i in 2010 318 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN morejobs and a higher growth rate. The South Kaua'i and the East Kaua'i Districts have the next highest volumes of jobs in the County. Between 2010 and 2035, average annual job growth for KauaTs six planning districts is expected to range from 1.23 percent for Lihu'e to 0.37 percent for the Figure 4. Population by Planning District (1990 -2035) 30,000 25,000 C 0 n 15,000 CL 0 10,000 5,000 225�5..110 Z3 6 16,855 0 O N Wt l0 m O N d' to m O N d lD W O N Ifi l0 m O N �t Cpl m m m m O O O O O r-1 ri ri r-1 ri N N N N N m M m m m m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-1 r-I r-i r-i ri N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N nlo-rE: 9 hers �UhWe —South Kauai add sp p a et - E p ,N —Rana le ele — Waimea- Kekaha NOTE: remove space.g NbTE: Add �V key. &a.sk ku.0 x l Figure 5. Actual vs. Projected Job Growth (1990 -2011) ✓ Kauai County Total Jobs, Actual and Projected (2011) 50,000 — 45 857 V/ APPENDIX C - GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS j APPENDICES 319 Table 3. Kaua'i County Jobs By District (1990 -2035) Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 County of Kaua'i 30,350 28,150 31,900 34,000 34,900 Uhu'e 12,473 12,554 14,519 15,820 16,403 South Kaua'i 5,299 5,027 5,617 5,892 6,003 Hanapepe;- .'Ele'ele 999 695 779 821 838 Waimea - Kekaha 1,888 1,791 1,986 2,064 2,094 North Shore 4,143 3,513 3,801 3,839 3,839 East Kaua'i 5,548 4,570 5,199 5,565 5,724 North Shore district. From approximately 2016- 2020, L-ihu'e is expected to have an average annual job growth rate of 1.06 percent. In the following decade, this rate is projected to be slightly lower (0.90% per year) and between 2030 and 2035,'`; Uhu'e's anticipated annual growth rate for jobs is 0.74 percent. Over the two decades preceding this General Plan, y a substantial number of jobs were generated within.'- the visitor industry (arts, entertainment, recreation,_ t accommodations, and food services). While Lihu'e has had fewer of thesejobsthan the rest of the County (20% vs. 22% in 2010), the difference is not large. On the other hand, L-ihu'e District has had larger shares .� of non - visitor jobs in several areas, including retail- trade (18% vs. 12 %), transportation, warehousing •' and utilities (8% vs. 5 %), finance Insurance and real k estate (7% vs. 5 %), public administration (7% vs. 5 %), o o wholesale trade (3% vs. 2 %), and the information industry (3% vs. 1 %). Most of the types of jobs projectedeto increase-''by DBEDT are included in the job types listed above. Thus, it is assumed that Uhu'e will continue to hold its position as the center for employment in the County and to increase the percentage of new jobs compared to other districts. Households The number of households53 in the County is a function of the population in any given year and 53 The U.S. Census Bureau defines a household as those persons who reside in a residential housing unit. Residents are defined as persons who report that the residence is their usual place of residence, sleep there most of the time, and take their meals there. Persons who reside at the housing unit for less than five months of the year are not considered part of the household. Households may be family households or non - family households, which can include some unrelated individuals. The household size is the number of individuals who reside in a given housing unit. 320 KAUA'1 COUNTY GENERAL PLAN the average household size. The Census equates a household with an occupied housing unit. Historical data for the number of households on Kaua'i was taken from the U.S. Decennial Census for Hawai'i in 1990 and 2000, and from the American Community Surveys for 2008 through 2011. Data from the Hawai'i Housing Planning Study, 1992,1997, 2003, 2006, and 2011 were used to supplement this historical data. The same sources provide figures for household size and persons living in group quarters .14 Persons per household data were obtained from the Decennial Census for 1990 and 2000. American Community Survey data was included for 2008 through 2011. The forecast method for households employed three steps: n.to7'E: rcrnDvy e)rfin s paces) 1. Determine the number of persons per household, defined as the ratio of total persons in the population to total households. 2. Forecast the persons per household. 3. Divide the persons living in households by the average household size to arrive at the number of households. 54 Persons who do not live in households are classified as "In Group Quarters" Their number includes persons in institutionalized settings (hospitals, prisons, dormitories, nursing homes, etc.) and groups of unrelated individuals occupying a housing unit. Figure 6. Jobs by Planning District (2006 -2035) 16,000 14,000 o L 12,000 M Ln 10,000 (LI 8,000 M 6,000 0 4,000 2,000 0 1990 2000 2010 W N M M 0 H N m g SSS00000000000000000000000000 M W N M M 0 H N m d' N W N M M 0 H N mlqt 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �� �UhWe —South Kauai —Hanapeper-r`Ele`ele NOTE: remove Spaces Waimea- Kekaha — North Shore East Kauai 0.66% ✓ CountoNicle Projections V Table 4 and Figure 7 show the household forecast for the County of Kaua'i through the year 2035. The forecast is based on an assumption that the ratio of persons to households will modestly increase from 2.89 in 2010 to 2.90 in 2035. The line in Figure 7 tracks the household counts and the bars indicate the annual growth rate. The total number of households in the County of Kaua'i is projected to increase from 23,984 in 2013 to 30,349 in 2035. That represents a total growth of 31.2 percent between 2010 and 2035, or about 1.07 percent per year. Table 4. Kauai County Households (1990 -2035) Projections by Planning District Table 5 and Figure 8 show the forecast number of households by planning district. As with population, the Lihu'e Planning District is planned for the largest increase in total households. Uhu'e is identified by the General Plan policy as a growth center, and is expected to increase its number of households by 48 percent during the next 25 years. This equates to an average annual increase of 1.7 percent. South Kaua'i (1.2 percent) is the only other district expected to exceed the County's average annual growth rate of 0.8 percent for households between now and 2035. The remaining districts are anticipated to have average annual growth rates of 0.7 percent or less. Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 County of Kaua'i 16,253 20,370 23,240 25,902 28,788 30,349 Households Average. - Annual 0.66% 0.18% 1.06% 1.10% 1.06% G rowthRate NOTE: uni�j 5paCiV19 APPENDIX C- GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS i APPENDICES 321 Figure 7. Kaua'i County Households (1990 -2035) 35,000 8.5% Visitor Arrivals Visitor arrivals are defined as the total number of individuals arriving from domestic and international points of departure by air and sea during a calendar year. Their number includes men, women, and children visiting from all ten of HawaiTs major market areas (MMAs). Total visitor arrivals include both day- trippers and overnight or longer visitors. By convention, visitors staying for more than 365 days are considered temporary residents. Historical data was taken from Hawai'i Tourism Authority, Annual Visitor Research Reports, 2000 to 2011 and the DBEDT Data Book historical database for years before 2000. DBEDT also has a long -range forecast for visitor arrivals at the State and County levels55. S ✓ Trends since the 2000 General Plan Historically, visitor arrivals have been volatile on Kaua'i. Hurricane 'Iniki devastated the tourism J55 Population and Economic Projections for the State of Hawaii to 2040, DBEDT 2040 Series, Research and Economic Analysis Division, Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (March 2012) 322 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN v 0 z M C c a infrastructure on Kaua'i, causing a deep rift in 1993 and a lengthy recovery period. At the next peak in 1999, Kaua'i had regained less than 90 percent of its former visitor count. After another drop following September 11, 2001, the count grew to its second peak in 2007, then fell sharply again in 2008 -2009 and has been climbing out at a slower pace than the post -Iniki recovery. The 2000 Kaua'i General Plan included low and high estimates for projected visitor growth, defined in Figure 9, actual ADVC growth has been variable, but as of 2010 was below the low General Plan estimate. Draft projections by the State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (State of Hawai'i Data Book, 2013) predict that ADVC growth will closely track the 2000 General Plan's low estimate at least until 2020. CountfyVide Projections Table 6 and Figure 10 show total visitor arrivals by air for the County of Kaua'i through the year 2035. The line in Figure 10 tracks visitor numbers and the bars indicate the average annual rates of change. Figure 11 represents visitors to Kaua'i as the Average 30,000 z 6.5% U 25,000 r 20,000 4.5% a� 0 15,000 0 2.5% t` 10,000 0.5% 5,000 0 -1.5% �O 10 ti0 ti0 ti0 ,ti0 .y0 ,ti0 .y0 ,ti0 .y0 �O .ti0 .ti0 ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 ,LO .LO .y0 .y0 ,ti0 �Kaua'iHHGrowth -- CountyofKaua'i Visitor Arrivals Visitor arrivals are defined as the total number of individuals arriving from domestic and international points of departure by air and sea during a calendar year. Their number includes men, women, and children visiting from all ten of HawaiTs major market areas (MMAs). Total visitor arrivals include both day- trippers and overnight or longer visitors. By convention, visitors staying for more than 365 days are considered temporary residents. Historical data was taken from Hawai'i Tourism Authority, Annual Visitor Research Reports, 2000 to 2011 and the DBEDT Data Book historical database for years before 2000. DBEDT also has a long -range forecast for visitor arrivals at the State and County levels55. S ✓ Trends since the 2000 General Plan Historically, visitor arrivals have been volatile on Kaua'i. Hurricane 'Iniki devastated the tourism J55 Population and Economic Projections for the State of Hawaii to 2040, DBEDT 2040 Series, Research and Economic Analysis Division, Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (March 2012) 322 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN v 0 z M C c a infrastructure on Kaua'i, causing a deep rift in 1993 and a lengthy recovery period. At the next peak in 1999, Kaua'i had regained less than 90 percent of its former visitor count. After another drop following September 11, 2001, the count grew to its second peak in 2007, then fell sharply again in 2008 -2009 and has been climbing out at a slower pace than the post -Iniki recovery. The 2000 Kaua'i General Plan included low and high estimates for projected visitor growth, defined in Figure 9, actual ADVC growth has been variable, but as of 2010 was below the low General Plan estimate. Draft projections by the State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (State of Hawai'i Data Book, 2013) predict that ADVC growth will closely track the 2000 General Plan's low estimate at least until 2020. CountfyVide Projections Table 6 and Figure 10 show total visitor arrivals by air for the County of Kaua'i through the year 2035. The line in Figure 10 tracks visitor numbers and the bars indicate the average annual rates of change. Figure 11 represents visitors to Kaua'i as the Average V) 0.Table 5. Households by Planning District (1990 -2035) 0 u 0 7 Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 County of Kaua'i 16,253 20,370 23,240 25,902 28,788 30,349 Lihu'e 3,542 4,187 4,983 6,051 7,281 7,923 South Kaua'i 3,208 3,862 4,250 4,946 5,699 6,096 Hanapepe- `Ele'ele 1,035 1,491 1,987 2,084 2,207 2,279 Waimea - Kekaha 1,460 1,893 1,962 2,165 2,253 2,306 North Shore 2,070 2,552 2,881 2,998 3,123 3,201 East Kaua'i 4,937 6,385 7,177 7,658 8,224 8,545 Daily VisitorCensus (ADVC).Thisisanalternatewayto Visitor Projections by Planning assess the volume of visitors to the County. District The projections show an overall growth rate of about one percent per year between 2010 and 2035, with a LTu'e has both the airport and the harbor, so all very slight decrease across that period. Based upon visitor "arrivals" technically occur there. Visitor historical data, some volatility can be expected year. • accommodation units as reported in the Hawaii to year in the form of a disrupting event once every Tourism Authority's (HTA) Visitor Plant Inventory were five to ten years. used to estimate each District's share of visitors. Table 7 and Figure 12 show the results of that method. The average length of stay (LOS) for a visitor party in Kaua'i was 7.51 days in 201 1. Visitor LOS on Kaua'i was South Kauai has the highest number of visitor units at its lowest point in 1990 at 6.14. The LOS rose to 6.8 and thus the largest share of visitors. East Kaua'i in 2004 and then fell to 6.24 in 2007. Length of stay and the North Shore closely track one another has increased steadily for Kaua'i visitors since 2007. in current and projected visitor volumes. Uhu'e Figure 8. Households by Planning District (1990 -2035) • m 8,000 7,000 -a 6,000 6 a 5,000 i 4,000 41 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 o° oti oN o`o o00 ti° m`1, ti°` do ti� ti° ti� ti°` ti`O ti`S �° �o tig do do ti� ,�o ,yo do ,�o ,yo do ,yo �o do ,yo do ,yo do UhWe -South Kauai Hanapepe- CE1e'ele tf0T6: eeM0L•.e ✓✓ SP a�GS - Waimea- Kekaha -North Shore EastKaua'i APPENDIX C- GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS I APPENDICES 323 District's visitor population is lower, with fewer visitor accommodations, and very few visitors stay in Waimea - Kekaha. None were assigned to the Hanap6p6- 'Ele'ele District. Figure 9. Actual vs. Projected Visitor Growth (1990 -2010) ✓ Kauai County Visitor Population, Actual and Projected 301000 -- -- - - -- - - -- -- - - - 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 0 --♦-- Actual ADVC -- F -DBEDT Projections (Draft) General Plan (low) General Plan (high) Table 6. Kauai County Visitor Arrivals (1990 -2035) 0 Z J Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035 County of Kaua'i Visitor Arrivals Jx 1,229 1,075 1,033 1,186 1,278 1,327 1,000) ;? Average Annual - 1.25% - 0.39% 1.48% 0.78% 0.76% Growth-Rate L KI-f% 5P0Lu►q 324 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN a W Z Table 7. Kauai County Visitor Arrivals by District (1998- 2035) Year 1998 2000 2010 2020 2030 County of Kauai 1,078 1,075 1,033 1,186 1,278 Uhu'e 186 182 180 181 193 South Kaua'i 186 355 377 444 475 Hanapepe''�'Ele'ele - - - - - Waimea - Kekaha 12 15 13 19 16 North Shore 204 236 239 302 314 East Kaua'i 324 287 224 282 298 Figure 12. Visitor Arrivals by Planning District (1998 -2035) 600 500 0 O ° 400 x m 300 N r0 L 200 4 0 ro 0 F- 100 0 00 O N I�f l0 00 O N d' t0 00 O N Zi- LO 00 O N lzt Ol O O O O O 1 4 ci 1-1 4 N N N N N m M m 01 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -UhWe -South Kaua'i - Waimea - Kekaha -North Shore 326 KAUA'ICOUNTY GENERAL PLAN East Ka ua'i APPENDIX E - LAND OWNERSHIP AND AVAILABILITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH Land Ownership KauaTs population is expected to grow by 31.2% between 2010 and 2035 (see Appendix Q. An important part of this General Plan process was to inventory lands that can accommodate future development and to gather information on planned and entitled projects. The purpose of the analysis was to determine whether land use designations needed to change to accommodate anticipated growth, and whether current land use designations support sustainable growth. Aannd Use BuildoutAnalysis(2015) prepared for this General Plan to examine Land supply compared to County growth projections. Data on land ownership patterns and planned and entitled projects was compiled and mapped. The following sections summarize the findings of this study. Major Landowners Land ownership on Kaua'i is highly concentrated. A dozen or so large landowners own much of the island, as shown on the Figures that follow. The State of Hawai'i isthe largest landowner, with management of most State lands split between the Departments of Land and Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Hawaiian Homelands. Other major landowners include the Robinson Family (which also owns all of Ni'ihau), Grove Farm Company, and Alexander & Baldwin. Within towns and villages, land ownership is more fragmented. The County included major landowners and developers in the General Plan update process. The purpose of this outreach was to obtain the status of known projects and to identify future plans that may be considered during this General Plan planning horizon. State & Federal Landowners dpyY,6 (p"ncis Department of Hawaiian Hom,da`nds Pacific Missile Range Facility Private Landowners & Developers Alexander & Baldwin Anaina Hou Land,LLC Cornerstone Hawaii Discovery Land Company Grove Farm Company HG Kaua'i Joint Venture LLC Kikiaola Land Company Leland R.Bertsch My Kapa'a. LLC Princeville Mauka Village LLC Robinson Family Thane, Inc. v APPENDIX E - LAND OWNERSHIP AND AVAILABILITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH I APPENDICES 355 inz 'ena '� ti Watmeo alaheoy .y fceville, �(t K n " liaUi ' v Ana East Kauai, r; Keal Kapa:a �5 Wailua, Lihu'e 3 s -c- Hanama'ulu Y�I� Lih u'e , aWiliwili A 1 in • 4 miles NORTH Kauai Island Major Landowner Map 0 25 5 ,a Major Roads E.A. Knudsen Trust Roads - Govt. County of K-6 / / 1' _. Planning District Boundary Govt. Federal !V O�G .i}iLiJL.Q �Gi%i1Qi c l�an9 �.i -i�l Vsl! -Q Li6Lt.."�; -_ `J Alexander & Baldwin Govt. State - Bette Midler - Gov[. State DHHL - Canpartners Realty Grove Farm ✓ Cornerstone Hawaii HRT Realty LLC ✓ D.R. Campion — Halaulani Condominium Haupu Land Co. Robinson B.B. - Hawaii Conf. Foundation Robinson Family Jurassic Kahili Ranch Roman Catholic Church Kamehameha Schools — Share No. 1 ,/✓ Mahaulepu Farm LLC - Visionary LLC Nat'l Trop. Bot. Garden W.H. Rice ✓ Princeville Dev. LLC Queen Liliuokalani Trust 356 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I& 1 miles NORTH South Kaua'i Major Landowner Mapes- .^ 0 ors s Alexander & Baldwin E.A. Knudsen Trust - Govt. County of Kauai Govt. Federal Govt. State Grove Farm Haupu Land Co. Mahaulepu Farm LLC Nat'l Trop. Bot. Garden Robinson Family Roman Catholic Church Visionary LLC Planning District Boundary - Major Roads Roads APPENDIX E - LAND OWNERSHIP AND AVAILABILITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH I APPENDICES 359 East Kaua'i Major Landowner Map Bette Midler Hawaii Conf. Foundation Canpartners Realty Princeville De, LLC Cornerstone Hawaii Roman Catholic Church Govt. Countyof Kauai Planning District Boundary Govt. Federal — Major Roads Govt. State - - -- Roads Govt. 5tate DHHL A 1-7-1es NORTH 0 t z � APPENDIX E - LAND OWNERSHIP AND AVAILABILITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH f APPENDICES 361 I/ population -ratio methodology, existing commercial zoned lands are adequate to accommodate future population projection. Light industrial can also be accommodated within commercial districts. Table 8. Ratio of Commercial Floor Area to Resident Population (2013) Supply of Resort Lands The Land Use Buildout Analysis (PBR, 2015) used the Hawai'i Tourism Authority's 2012 Visitor Plant Inventory to analyze resort lands. Kaua'i County Plant Inventory, 2013), all Planning Districts except the North Shore and Lihu'e are projected to have an excess visitor unit supply. Waimea - Kekaha will have the most excess followed by Kapa'a - Wailua and South Kaua'i. The North Shore has an extensive supply of potential single - family transient vacation rentals within the VDA that could respond to market demand. Conclusions The major conclusions regarding KauaTs land use inventory are: Planning District Total Existing Square Feet % of the County 2010 Pop. Square Feet Needed by 2035 Increase Required to meet 2035 need County of Kaua'i 3,203,654 49% 14,683 5,117,817 1,914,163 LihWe 838,018 13% 11,696 1,207,660 369,642 South Kaua'i 525,826 8% 6,157 605,849 80,023 Hanapepe - 'Ele'ele 402,239 6% 5,561 474,933 72,694 Waimea - Kekaha 307,751 5% 8,002 343,557 35,806 North Shore 1,244,271 19% 20,992 1,488,360 244,089 East Kaua'i 6,521,759 100% 67,091 9,238,175 2,716,416 had 8,289 transient accommodation units in 2012. This number includes 98 bed and breakfast units on 27 properties. All Planning Districts have Visitor Destination Areas (VDA), except Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele. The Planning District with the largest VDA in terms of acreage is South Kaua'i, followed by North Shore, Lihu'e, Kapa'a - Wailua, and Waimea - Kekaha. In terms of units, South Kaua'i ranks first, however, the order changes with Kapa'a - Wailua second, followed by North Shore, then L-ihu'e. The Buildout Analysis suggeststhatthere is morethan enough Resortzoned land to accommodate projected visitor growth. Factoring in planned resort development, which amounts to approximately 4,500 new units (Visitor 364 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN • More land is needed to accommodate residential growth and generate housing affordable for residents. • Some growth will be needed in every district. The majority of the growth will be directed to Uhu'e and to existing town centers. • Resort lands are more than adequate to meet demand. Commercial and Industrial lands may be adequate in acreage, but distribution may be an issue to explore further. Entitled Residential Projects by District District Project Name Housing Units East Kauai Pi'ilani Mai He Kai (DHHLAnahola) 49% Kulana Kapa'a Highlands, Phase 2 TOTAL 1,122 'Ele'ele A &B'Ele'ele Residential 201 Lima Ola (Affordable) 450 TOTAL 651 Uhu'e DHHL Wailua, Phase 1 188 Kohea Loa - D.R. Horton 444 Pikake Subdivision 146 Grove Farm Wailani Residential 1,450 Koamalu 220 Waiola Phase 1 47 Waiola Phase II 56 Waiola Phase II 93 TOTAL 2,644 North Shore Kolopua (Princeville Affordable) 44 TOTAL South Kauai Brydeswood Ranch (A &B) 24 K61oa Creekside 72 Kukui'ula Employee Housing 100 Kukui'ula 750 The Village at K51oa Town 34 K61oa Camp - Waihononu 50 CIRI (CLDC) Subdivision 10 TOTAL 1,040 Waimea Kekaha lots 40 Kikiaola Mauka 270 Kikialoa - Field 14 56 TOTAL 366 TOTAL 5,867 366 KAUAI COUNTY GENERAL PLAN V Entitled Commercial Projects by District District Project Name Commercial Square Footage K oloa K61oa Rum Company Store and Cafe 9,000 TOTAL 9,000 Lih u'e Hokulei Village 222,000 Grove Farm Wailani Commercial 1,132,299 Weinberg Foundation Renovation 24,250 Kukui Grove Commercial Buildout 96,000 Weinberg Foundation /Ahukini 20,000 TOTAL 1,494,549 North Shore Kilauea Crossings 6,070 Kilauea Town Center 46,800 Hanalei Halelea Office 2,000 TOTAL 54,870 South Kaua'i Village at K61oa Town 96,000 Kukui'ula ABC Store 21,000 K61oa Marketplace 76,000 Old Glass Warehouse 7,200 TOTAL 200,200 ISLAND TOTAL 1,758,619 APPENDIX F - ENTITLED PROJECTS BY DISTRICT I APPENDICES 367 East Kauai District Planning District Boundary F F Mixed Use Major Roads Resort — Roads Entitled lands Commercial Housing 368 KAUA'ICOUNTY GENERAL PLAN A 1— 2 mules NORTH s Residential Resort Project Name Housing GP Land Use Status Map # Project Name Units Designation Status 1 Waiola Phases 1 -III 196 Urban Center, Open, Final Approvals 6 Hokulei Village 220,000 Residential report (2/8/11) anv�ucj 2 Koamalu 220 Urban Center Submitted Annual Status Renovation Report 3 Grove Farm Wailani Residential 1,450 Urban Center Negotiating infrastructure TOTAL 1,398,549 and access issues 4 Kohea Loa - D.R. Horton 444 Urban Center Submitted 2013 Status Report 5 DHHL Waioa, Phase I 188 Agriculture No plan for development within GP timeframe TOTAL 2,498 Resort Commercial Map # Project Name Housing GP Land Use Status Map # Project Name Units Designation Status 9 Kauai Lagoons 700 Resort Submitted anual status 6 Hokulei Village 220,000 Urban Center report (2/8/11) anv�ucj 7 TOTAL 700 Urban Center Phase I complete Commercial Map # Project Name Sq. ft. GP Land Use Status 3 Grove Farm Wailani 1,132,299 Urban Center Unknown Commercial 6 Hokulei Village 220,000 Urban Center Under Construction 7 Weinberg Foundation 24,350 Urban Center Phase I complete Renovation 8 Weinberg Foundation /Ahukini 20,000 Urban Center Seeking building permits TOTAL 1,398,549 APPENDIX F - ENTITLED PROJECTS BY DISTRICT 1 APPENDICES 371 I,/ Residential Map # Project Name Housing Units GP Land Use Designation Status 1 K ik iaola Mauka 270 Residential Unknown 2 K ik iaola Field 14 56 Open, Residential Not Constructed TOTAL 326 NOTE fix - vvmo -+ X09 914-c,� Resort Map # Project Name Housing Units GP Land Use Designation Status 3 Kapalawai Resort LLC 250 Resort Unknown TOTAL 1,122 APPENDIX F - ENTITLED PROJECTS BY DISTRICT I APPENDICES 375 Residential Map # Project Name Housing Units GP Land Use Designation Status 1 Brydeswood Ranch (A &B) 24 Open, Agriculture Unknown 2 Koloa Creekside 72 Residential Ongoing 3 Kukui'ula Employee Housing 100 Residential, Open Land deeded to County 4 Kukuiula 750 Residential, Resort Final subdivision map approval for parcels M1,M4,Y 5 The Village at Koloa Town 34 Residential Unknown 6 Koloa Camp - Waihononu 50 Residential Underway 7 CIRI (CLDC) Subdivision 10 Resort Planning commision approved 8/26/14 TOTAL 1,040 Commision (Nov. 2014) Resort Map # Project Name Housing Units GP Land Use Designation Status 12 Poipu Beach Estates 110 Resort Several lots are built out 13 Village at Poipu 51 Resort Moving forward 14 Pilimai at Poipu 191 Resort Under construction 15 Kiahuna Poipu Golf Resort 282 Resort Unknown 4 Kikuiula 750 Residential, Resort Final subdivision map approval for parcels M1,M4,Y 16 Palms at Poipu 56 Resort Unknown 17 Sheraton Kauai Expansion 173 Resort Unknown TOTAL 1,613 Commision (Nov. 2014) Commercial ajJ: Desi9ha�,�m Map # Project Name Sq. ft. GP Land Use,,, Status 5 Village at Koloa Town 96,000 Residential Unknown 8 K61oa Rum Company Store and 9,000 Residential, Approved Planning Cafe Agriculture, Open Commision (Nov. 2014) 9 Kukuiula ABC Store 21,000 Residential Open p Approved Planning Commision (Nov. 2014) 10 K61oa Marketplace 76,000 Residential Unknown 11 Old Glass Warehouse 7,200 Residential Approved Planning Commision (Nov. 2014) TOTAL 209,200 APPENDIX F - ENTITLED PROJECTS BY DISTRICT I APPENDICES 377 Residential Map # Project Name Housing Units GP Land Use Designation Status 1 Kolopua (Princeville Affordable) 44 Resort Under Construction 3 TOTAL 44 Residential Commercial Shopping Commercial add , ;y�� -fig Map # Project Name Sq. ft. GP Land Use % Status 2 Kilauea Crossings 6,070 Residential Unknown 3 Kilauea Town Center 46,800 Residential Commercial Shopping Center 4 Hanalei Halelea Office 2,000 Residential Approved by Commission 2013 TOTAL 54,870 APPENDIX F - ENTITLED PROJECTS BY DISTRICT I APPENDICES 379 IFA Waimea-Kekaha Visitor Destination, Areas (VDA) North Shore U h We OR South Kaual ATTACHMENT 2 East Kauai ra Waimea-Kekaha Visitor Destination, Areas (VDA) North Shore U h We OR South Kaual ATTACHMENT 2 East Kauai 3 LO CD 0 CD CD (In 4 1" ATTACHMENT 2 Kekaha Waimea Visitor Destination Areas ('FDA) r- 3 V) CD V) CD Q-) Lf) Visitor Destination Areas (VDA) Princeville ATTACHMENT 2 Lawa'i Kai Visitor Destination Areas {'FDA) PO'ipu ATTAC Land Use Map m East Kaua'a Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural A>;ricultural \J- r f Anah(If h j Anahola= Post0ffice. AL nv J Kapa'a � Bypass Rd � (Kapa'a alia ATTACHMENT 3 O - Mahelona Medical Center —Kapa a Beach Park —Bryan J. Baptiste -7 Sports Complex —Coco Palms - Parks and Recreation Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort Industrial ! in = ! miles NORTH Miles 0 0.5 1 a R . e _ _ , ATTACHMENT 3 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort Plantation Camp Industrial ` Transportation Military Provisional Agriculture ATTACHMENT 3 Land Use Map - Kaua'i J, -f ✓Pence i �lle T is ut;;o• wy _ _ �a Ha ena-., H r4yHanalei 1Eilauea _ Anahola 'iT war : s� ' N�01 £t3 �� ?�E'G�f t ✓Siai�(iE1 �� f ` Kea lia ,1 X01 f J� ( a ? Wailua :r �4��;y '��, R '� �` t . �•t�v������`F��'1p r' Hanama'ulu�'' �Kekaha aimea I frt a4?f_ i �sy i Nawlilwili t r C t Hanapepe� . � Ele eIe Koloa R(4 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 1 G Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours j_. — Urban Edge Boundary Reservoirs Natural Agricultural (IAL) Small Town - Parks and Recreation Resort Golf Course Provisional Resort ` (Pending Community Plan Process) Homestead ��, University Zone Residential Community Plantation Camp Urban Center Industrial Neighborhood Center Transportation Neighborhood General '':,'A Military 'land Use Map - Koloa, Po`ipu, Kalaheo Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural Agricultural r � q�. F Ka/awa� Park+r .a Kalaheo i, "� r ,Lawavi� moo` Z> Kukui`ul Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead 'Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Large Town Po`ipu Beach ATTACHMENT 3 e fro . A& 1 in =1 mile S f�IDRTH h9iles �� —� Q 0.5 1 2 Small Town Resort Industrial Transportation Military `WN Provisional Agriculture Land Use Map o Uhu'e Kaumuali°i -H Wilcox Memorial Hospital Uhu'e /::, Kukui Grove + Shopping Center -\ ,.f. N, Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Urban Edge Boundary Reservoirs Natural Hanama'uh IV �N�WI 3 T ATTACHMENT 3 Alekoko Fishpond AL I in = I moles WORTH Miles - a 0 0.5 1 2 Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Urban Center Npighhnrhnnrl Cpntpr Neighborhood General Resort WUniversity Zone Transportation r :�� Military Land Use Map - North Shore ATTACHMENT 3 Kilauea Lighthouse Princeville 4ina Ho okupu Agricultural Park—, \ Kilauea Ha`ena — Princeville Center Hanalei River ,< �� .: •, • f � Sty l ' Walnlha` I �• � .drr> � f �,, ;:• rte' � , � pJ�'` � ' y /� �t{ i 'P nncevilleAirport Kaipap/ AEL y .�. T. 1. ,!' ✓''rj�l jl�� ,. 'Jig 1 in = 2 miles NORTH J_. MilesF 1 }A1 0 1 2 4 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort _ Transportation Military ATTACHMENT 3 6= " ,rw. c f � } c IZL l\ Off, ,; �Kekaha Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural Agricultural FA Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort r Waimea Makaweli PakalB —, I rrTM N0R-TH fviifes G. 1 2 Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) Plantation Camp Transportation Military ATTACHMENT 4 ,� 0 ■ ■ a � • � • a e r ■ B Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort \Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) ® Plantation Camp Transportation Military ATTACHMENT 2 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER ARRYL KANESHIRO (By Request) PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT - TOURISM 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 28 by updating Table 1 -4 with data from Table 1, "Visitor Arrivals to Kauai County, 1990 to 2035" (Kaua`i General Plan Update: Visitor Updates, October 2017). 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 157 as follows: "The policy of the General Plan is to uphold Kauai as a unique visitor destination by focusing on revitalization and limiting new resort designations. This shifts the focus from expansion of the visitor industry to implementing a model of high value, low impact tourism that puts protection of the qualities and values that visitors come to experience as a highest priority." 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 157 as follows: "1.1 [Understanding Kaua`i's Carrying Capacity for Tourism] Managing Average Daily Visitor Count and Visitor Impacts Every year, over 1.1 million visitors are drawn to Kaua`i's beautiful environment and rich array of cultural and outdoor activities. Research shows that most visitors are attracted to the island's peaceful and unhurried setting. These preferences align well with residents' desire to preserve Kaua`i's natural beauty and small town character. [As much as visitors support Kaua`i's economy, they also stress infrastructure and increase the demand for public services. As shown in Table 3 -3, in 2016 Kauai had an average daily visitor census (ADVC) of 24,797 visitors, enough to increase Kaua`i's population by more than a third. ADVC is variable due to many factors including economic conditions, natural disasters, political conflicts, and others. On Kauai, ADVC has been slowly growing at an average rate of about 2% per year since 2000, with a slight dip due to the economic recession of 2008 -2009 (Figure 3 -9).] 1of18 ATTACHMENT 2 As much as visitors support Kaua`i's economy, they also stress infrastructure and increase the demand for public services. For this reason, recent growth in visitor arrivals has been a concern for many residents. In 2016, Kaua`i's Average Daily Visitor Count (ADVC) was 24,797, which is more than one -third of the 2016 resident population. Over the long term, growth in Kaua`i's ADVC has averaged 2% a year. However, since 2010, annual ADVC growth has averaged 4 %. It should be noted that Kaua`i's ADVC is highly variable year - to -year and is sensitive to global economic conditions, political conflict, and growth in other tourism markets. Recent projections estimate that ADVC will near 30,000 by 2030. [Many feel Kauai has hit its "carrying capacity" with regard to certain infrastructure systems, particularly the most heavily utilized parks and road networks.] Many feel that the current level of tourism growth on Kaua'i is excessive and as a result creates negative social and environmental impacts. For example, the Kauai Tourism Strategic Plan (2015) noted that when ADVC exceeds 25,000 that there is a notable decline in both the visitor experience and residential quality of life. The traffic congestion along the highway in Wailua- Kapa`a is an oft -cited example. Popular destinations such as Hd'ena State Park are actively looking for ways to address over - crowding and other impacts. Acknowledgement of a tourism carrying capacity is occurring at the State level as well; the State of Hawaii Climate Adaptation Initiative (Act 183) calls for analysis of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity for the State and Counties. In order to deal with tourism impacts, government and the resort industry need to collaborate and engage in tourism management. One important step is to actively monitor and assess visitor impacts on infrastructure and facilities. By quantifying impacts, the County and State can better plan to control the impacts of excessive tourism. Tourism management includes a range of methods, from increasing the supply of recreational opportunities and facilities, reducing public use of certain resources, and changing visitor behavior through education and signage. 1.2 Managing Visitor Unit Inventory Expansion Resort and hotel properties account for 20 percent of the total revenue from Real Property, and vacation rentals account for an additional 21 percent.36 Over 40 percent of the County's Real Property tax revenue comes from visitor accommodations. [Today's visitor plant inventory is a mix of hotel units, timeshares, B &B's, vacation rental units and condo hotels (See Figure 3 -10).] However, dealing with excessive tourism also means managing the supply of visitor units. According to 2016 Visitor Plant Inventory, Kaua'i has 8,444 visitor units which 2of18 ATTACHMENT 2 includes hotel units, timeshares, apartment- hotels, and individual vacation units (see Figure 3 -10). This is an increase of 1,285 units from the 2000 Visitor Plant Inventory of 7,159. The majority of Kaua`i's visitor accommodation falls in the deluxe to luxury price range. Less than three percent of Kaua`i's accommodation is considered budget (campsites are not considered to be units)." PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT — FUTURE LAND USE 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 65 as follows: "Lucy Wright Park is another important community destination located just a block from the central square that could benefit from improved facilities and parking. Waimea Canyon Park, adjacent to the Waimea Canyon Middle School, is the community's gional park that is currently used for sports events and tournaments on the West Side. In 2013, the community envisioned the future expansion of the park through the Waimea Sports Complex Master Plan. In the plan, the community called for an additional 65 acres to create a multi -use sports venue that would better serve residents and venerate economic activity for West Side businesses through hosting statewide and national sports tournaments." 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 69, by adding a new item A.7. under "A. CONTINUE TO IMPROVE UPON WAIMEA'S HISTORIC CENTER AS A VIBRANT AND WALKABLE DESTINATION." (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: "7. Explore ways to fund and implement the Waimea Sports Complex Master Plan." 6. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 80 as follows: "Neighborhood Centers & Urban [Growth] Edge Boundary 3of18 ATTACHMENT 2 [As the main urbanized area on Kauai that is planned to accommodate approximately half of its future growth, the Land Use Map for the Lihu`e District looks different than the rest of the island. The Lihu`e District was the first to adopt an Urban Growth Boundary to delineate the limits of desired urban growth.] Lihu`e is the only district on Kauai to have an Urban Edge Boundary delineation. The boundary was adopted through the Lihu`e Community Plan 2015) to limit urban sprawl, defining where higher density development should be contained throughout the district. The Urban Edge Boundary is intended to facilitate preservation of agricultural lands and uses by focusing future growth and development within existing or identified Urban Centers and Neighborhood Centers." 7. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 80 as follows: "Within the Urban [Growth] Edge Boundary, there are [multiple] existing and future designated Neighborhood Centers that correspond to Mixed Use Special Planning Areas (SPAS). These SPAS indicate priority "areas of change" for infill and new development to accommodate projected population growth. Most of these Neighborhood Centers are within a half mile of one another[, creating a continuous tapestry of urbanized lands of varying density]. The Neighborhood General designation is not applied to Lihu`e[, as] because most of [the] these half -mile walksheds overlap. Instead, the General Plan Urban Center designation is retained in those developable areas outside of designated Neighborhood Centers." 8. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 90 as follows: "The inundation maps for the 1 -foot, [and] 3 -foot, and 6 -foot SLR scenarios can be found in Appendix E." PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT — THE WATERSHED 9. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 105 as follows: "Based on the best available science, we should plan for three feet of sea level rise by [2100] the latter half of the century." :9 ATTACHMENT 2 1O.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 105 by replacing the current section 3.2 "Protecting Coastal and Near -Shore Habitats" with a new section 3.2 "Regulating Coastal Development and Activities" and its footnotes ( *) (with appropriate renumbering as needed), and moving the current section 3.2 "Protecting Coastal and Near -Shore Habitats" to become the new section 4.3 "Protecting Coastal and Near -Shore Habitats" on page 109, as follows: 3.2 Re ulating Coastal Development and Activities The State of Hawaii participates in the federal Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program, established through the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. The Program seeks to "Preserve, protect, develop, and where possible, to restore or enhance the resources of the nation's coastal zone" and is administered by NOAA.* The Hawaii CZM Program employs a wide range of strategies to manage coastal issues, mitigate detrimental environmental impacts resulting from development, and uphold environmental laws. Through statewide planning and community initiatives, such as the Ocean Resources Management Plan (ORMP) and Marine and Coastal Zone Advocacy Council (MACZAC), the CZM Program sponsors State and County efforts related to coastal stewardship, planning, permitting, education, and outreach.* The Special Management Area (SMA) was established in 1975 as part of the Hawaii CZM Program. Pursuant to HRS 205A, counties are authorized to determine SMA boundaries and administer SMA permits and shoreline setback provisions. The SMA covers coastal areas including roads, natural areas, and resort development. Proposed development within the SMA is subiect to an assessment to determine whether an SMA Maior Use Permit or an SMA Minor Permit is required. SMA permits do not prohibit development in coastal areas, but ensure development, uses, and activities comply with the CZM program and SMA Guidelines. The construction of —a single - family residence as well as interior alterations, agriculture, and underground utilities are land uses and activities within the SMA that are generally excluded from the definition of "development" pursuant to HRS 205A -22. The County also regulates coastal development through a Shoreline Setback Ordinance (2008) that prohibits development within a shoreline setback area. The setback line is based on average lot depth and long -term coastal erosion rates from the Kauai Coastal Erosion Study.* *(httl)s://coast.noaa.gov/czm/acti) *(htt-p://Dlanning.hawaii.gov/czm/about-czm/) *(Fletcher, et al., 2012) 5of18 ATTACHMENT 2 [3.2] 4.3 Protecting Coastal and Near -Shore Habitats" 11. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 109 as follows: "4.2 Countering the Threat of Invasive Species and Diseases Prevention, containment, and eradication of invasive species require persistent and coordinated attention by all levels of government and conservation groups, as well as cooperation [by] from businesses and the community. Efforts to date have thus far prevented ecologically destructive invasive [species] fauna such as snakes, mongoose, the varroa mite, coqui frogs, and little fire ants from establishing lasting footholds on Kauai. Other invasive species such as [miconia] the rose - winged parakeet and feral cats are established on the island and require effective management and containment strategies to minimize their impacts. The parakeets pose a significant economic and food safety issue on Kauai, since the birds are naturally drawn to fruit trees on local commercial farms." Feral cats are also a public concern as they carry toxoplasmosis, a disease that enters the water supply from cat feces and has been documented to kill marine animals such as the endangered Hawaiian monk seal. Invasive flora have a wide range of detrimental effects on the island's ecology and economy. Species such as banana poka (Passiflora tarminiana), miconia (Miconia calvescens), and strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum )spread aggressively in forests and contribute to the hearty diet and proliferation of rodents and feral pigs, which subsequently cause both ongoing conservation issues and food safety concerns for local agriculture producers. Furthermore, invasive herbaceous and woody plant pests such as bush beardgrass (Schizachyrium condensatum), aramina (Urena lobata), wedelia (Sphagneticola trilobata), and fireweed (Senecio madagascariencsis) spread rapidly and can cause serious damage from an economic standpoint, as these types of invasive weeds can easily overtake pastures and grazing lands for livestock and are exceptionally difficult to eradicate. Viral, bacterial, and fungal diseases such as Rapid `Ohi`a Death (ROD) and Banana Bunchy Top Virus (BBTV) cause flora -based infections that pose serious threats to indigenous flora and local food sources, respectively. Knowledge of these diseases and best management practices for preventing the spread of these diseases via contact with humans, automobiles, pets, and equipment /tools must be taught to the general public, and consciously adopted into all of our daily lives. 6of18 ATTACHMENT 2 Active measures to minimize the impact of diseases and invasive pests must continue to be implemented and improved. Through concerted efforts and partnerships between the County, State, and Federal agencies (i.e., USDA, USFWS, NRCS, East & West Kauai Soil and Water Conservation Districts, HDOA, and DLNR), conservation groups (i.e., Kaua`i Conservation Alliance, KISC, Plant Pono, NTBG, the Nature Conservancy, and the Koke`e Resource Conservation Program) and academic institutions (i.e., University of Hawaii — CTAHR and local schools), prevention, monitoring, and eradication efforts will continue to combat the introduction and establishment of invasive species and diseases on Kaua`i." 12.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 111, item C.12.b. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: "Projects that support the prevention and eradication of invasive species, [eradication] and the protection and conservation of [endangered and threatened] threatened and endangered species and habitats." PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT — HOUSING 13. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 116 as follows: "Although previously permitted, new ADUs are not allowed on agricultural or open lands unless approvals were secured before 2007. The County is also exploring whether to allow Additional Rental Units (ARU) in residential zoned areas. An ARU is a long term rental unit that includes a kitchen, bedroom(s), and bathroom facilities, attached or detached from a dwelling unit. Unlike ADUs, ARUs are restricted in size and allowed only in residentially zoned areas. ADUs are not restricted in size and were previously allowed within the Agriculture Zoning District and the Open Zoning District. Infill development can further diversity Kaua`i's housing stock through "missing middle" housing in walkable communities." 14.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 122, by adding a new item A.1.d. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: 7of18 ATTACHMENT 2 "d. Creatively exploring ways to use the tax code for enhanced compliance of non - conforming TVRs." PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT — PUBLIC SAFETY & HAZARDS RESILIENCY 15.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 187 as follows: "[The more that each of us is prepared and does our part, the safer and more resilient we will be as a whole.] The better prepared each of us are to do our part, the safer and more resilient we will be as a whole." 16.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending pages 189 -190 as follows: "KEMA coordinates the County response to all hazardous weather events and operates a network of evacuation shelters in partnership with the Department of Education and the American Red Cross. [They also monitor and respond to infectious disease outbreaks with the Department of Health.] KEMA works with Federal agencies such as the National Weather Service and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center to ensure Kauai residents and visitors receive life- saving information on potential hazards in a timely manner." 17.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 190 by adding a new section 2.4 as follows: "2.4 Homeland Security, Threats, and Health - Related Hazards In addition to managing Kauai's susceptibility to natural hazards, KEMA and emergency response professionals (i.e., Police and Fire Departments) must also be prepared to mitigate and respond to potential threats that stem from society itself. Such security threats and health - related hazards include but are not limited to: acts of terrorism, acts of war, biological warfare /terrorism, nuclear attacks /threats, hazardous materials, and disease outbreaks and epidemics. As with natural hazards, communities and school campuses must be educated on the best practices and techniques for preparing for and responding to these ATTACHMENT 2 unique types of threats and hazards. This includes the universal understandin, for all residents of what to do when prompted by the outdoor siren warning systems. The Kauai Police Department is the lead agency responsible for Active Shooter Training for the County. Additionally, KEMA will occasionally coordinate Department of Homeland Security trainings on this issue. The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency is the lead in public education and outreach for Nuclear /Ballistic Missile Preparedness /Awareness; KEMA is the County lead, with support of on- island trained personnel from KPD, KFD, and the Department of Health.— Kaua`i District Office. The State Department of Health — Kaua`i District Health Office is the on- island lead for all Public Health and Epidemiological emergencies; KEMA will assist with coordination amongst partners and relaying information to the public." 18.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 193 as follows: "Climate change and its associated symptoms [could] will have wide - ranging impacts [to] on Kaua`i's environment, economy, and way of life." 19.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 193 as follows: "There is substantial documentation of global warming trends over previous decades, but predicting the exact rate and [extent] timin of future warming and associated sea level rise (SLR) is difficult. Based on the best available science,_ we should plan for three (3) feet of sea level rise by the latter half of the century. It is important to note that [these estimates] this estimate may be conservative, as some studies project upwards of [6] six 6 feet of sea level rise by 2100. The greatest uncertainty surrounding the projections is the rate and magnitude of ice sheet loss primarily from Greenland and West Antarctica. Further, the rate and magnitude of sea level rise is dependent on worldwide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Given the range of uncertainty, [the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recommends] a scenario -based planning approach is recommended that [balances the degree of potential change with the tolerance for risks associated with that change.] utilizes a range of SLR projections and uses a risk tolerance metric when choosing a SLR planning target for a project. For example, new infrastructure with a long anticipated life would represent very low risk tolerance while [an uninhabited area with no endangered species could tolerate greater risk from 9of18 ATTACHMENT 2 climate change impacts.] shorter -term, low -cost infrastructure adaptable and /or moveable could tolerate a L-reater risk." 20. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 193 as follows: "Water supply may also be impacted by climate change, especially if Hawai`i's [convective] rainfall patterns are disrupted or if salt water intrudes into any low-lying water wells. [Increased evapotranspiration will make] Kaua`i's arid environments, such as the West Kauai plateau, [more dry] may become drier and may impact agriculture as well. [Fortunately, salt water intrusion into the aquifer is not considered a major threat due to the buoyancy of salt water and the low permeability of the caprock in coastal areas.]" 21. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 195, by amending item A.6. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: "Within the Special Management Area (SMA) and Zoning Permit program:. . . and, (d) [Add] Evaluate conditions that prohibit shoreline armoring." 22. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 247 as follows: "Maps depicting potential 1 -foot, [and] 3 -foot, and 6 -foot sea level rise scenarios for select locations on the island are included in Appendix D." PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT — TRANSPORTATION 23.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 405, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 126, item C.1. as follows: "1. Establish transportation priorities [based on] using a performance -based evaluation process, which considers the following criteria: a. Support of growth areas as designated in the General Plan and Community Plans; b. Support of the County's mode shift targets; 10 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 c. Priorities identified in Community Plans and other planning documents; d. Safety, with a priority on safety for children; e. Congestion management; f. Cost in relation to available funds; and, g. Opportunity to leverage non - County funds. h. Safety; i. System preservation; j. Economic development /community access; k. Support of growth areas as designated in the General Plan and Community Plans; 1. Congestion management; and m. Environmental and cultural impacts." 24.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 129 as follows: " • Opportunity for short -term car rentals on site at resorts. These and other recommendations are found in the Kauai Short -Range Transit Plan (approved by the County Council October 2017). Improved transit service cannot be accomplished if transit funding is irregular." 25.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 406, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 129, by deleting item C.I. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "[Implement a local circulator, mainline consolidation, and expansion as recommended in the County's shuttle feasibility study and Short Range Transit Plan.]" 26.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 129 by amending item B.I. and deleting item B.3. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "1. [Complete a Short Range Transit Plan to identify efficiencies in paratransit and fixed route service and to establish priorities for service expansion.] Implement the Short -Range Transit Plan. 11 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 2. Complete a Mid -Range (4 -7 year) Transit Plan for longer -term transit planning. [3. Complete the North Shore, South Shore, and East Side transit feasibility study to identify streamlining of existing local transit service, potential local service expansion, a financial plan to fund service, and seamless integration of public and private transit services.] [4.] 3. b. Amending page 130, item C.B. as follows: "[Identify locations and construct west side and North Shore satellite base yards if recommended in the Short Range or Mid -Range transit plan.] Provide adequate and efficient bus storage and maintenance facilities." c. Amending page 130 by deleting item C.11. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "[Update maintenance facilities to continue maintainence of the bus fleet.]" d. Amending page 130 by deleting item D.1. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "[Evaluate privatization or contracting of some transit services, such as paratransit and local shuttles.]" PROPOSALS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT — OTHER 27. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 6, appropriately inserted, as follows: WCthele means a division, piece, department, category, portion, or land rliviainn " 28.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 10, appropriately inserted, with footnotes ( *) appropriately numbered, as follows: 12 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 "Kuleana Rights means allodial titles to Hoa `Aina for their own (fee simple) lands, house lots, and certain privileges, including access from the mountains to the shore to collect resources granted by The Kuleana Act of the Mahele (December 21, 1849) also referred to as the "Kuleana Act of 1850. "( *) In 2012 the Hawaii Supreme Court reaffirmed the viability of Kuleana rights in the present day.( *)" *Hoakalei Cultural Foundation Website 2014. *Opinion of the Court by Nakayama, Acting C.J., Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, April 27, 2012; Hawaii Reporter April 2012. 29.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 10, appropriately inserted, with footnotes ( *) appropriately numbered, as follows: "The Mahele (also referred to as The Great Mahele) means the process, proposed by Kamehameha III, of redistributing of Hawaiian land to guarantee that Hawaiian people would not lose their tenured land as a result of the Alien Land Ownership Act of 1850, which allowed foreign land ownership in order to motivate capital and labor.( *) *Chinen, JJ The Great Mahele, 1958; HawaiiHistory.org 2017)." 30.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 10, appropriately inserted, with footnotes ( *) appropriately numbered, as follows: "Urban Edge Boundary means a regional boundary intended to limit urban sprawl. It defines where higher density urban development should be contained. Areas outside the Urban Edge Boundary are intended for lower density land uses such as open, conservation, and agriculture." 31.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 59 as follows: "12. Parks and Golf Courses The Park Designation describes major active public and private parks. The designation includes state parks, regional and district parks, stadiums, linear parks, and beach parks. Actions for parks are found in Chapter 3. A new designation is "Golf Courses." Golf Courses were previously included in the 13 of 18 Open and Parks and Recreation designations commercial uses are included in these areas." ATTACHMENT 2 Public amenities and 32.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 121 as follows: "B. [PLANS AND STUDIES] PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. [Integrate kupuna needs into all future planning efforts.] Regularly convene a Kaua'i Houseless Solutions Summit to develop collaborative short -term homeless solutions involving Kaua`i's faith -based community with support from health and human service organizations and County and State agencies." 33.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 145 by and its footnotes ( *) (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "Inter- island terminal needs may also be met by harbor reconfiguration or additional land acquisition. In addition to handling overseas and interisland containerized cargo, Nawiliwili Harbor can accommodate the domestic and international cruise ships that come to Kauai. At Nawiliwili Harbor, Pier 2 is primarily used as the cruise ship terminal with a berth length of 531 feet and a depth of 35 feet at pier side.* In 2017, 21 cruise ship companies anchored at Nawiliwili Harbor with Pride of America accounting for the majority of the trips to Kaua`i.* With the exception of Pride of America, a Hawaii Cruise line, most cruise ships that come to Kauai are part of a longer route that comes from either Los Angeles or Mexico. In the Commercial Harbors 2025 Master Plan (2001), there were several recommendations for Nawiliwili Harbor that included providing sufficient berthing facilities for the rg owing industry and ensuring the safety of passengers from commercial cargo operations. To implement the Commercial Harbors 2025 Master Plan, the Hawaii Department of Transportation — Harbors Division has recently included in their draft environmental assessment a proposal for Nawiliwili Harbor drainage and pedestrian improvements. The paving and construction of the roadway connecting Pier 2 and Pier 3 will improve safety y designating a pedestrian walkway for cruise ship passengers separate from the commercial cargo activities. *HDOT — Harbors Division, Port of Call Handbook: http: / /hidot. hawaii. gov/ harbors /file s /2012 / 10 /Nawiliwili- Harbor- Kauai.p df 14 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 *HDOT — Harbors Division, Passenyer and Cruise Schedules: https:Hhidot.hawaii. gov /harbors /files /2013 /01 /DO COO l.p df 4.3 Valuing Small Boat Harbors as Important Recreational Resources" 34.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 145, by adding a new item B.S. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: "5. Support HDOT — Harbors Division to implement and update the Kauai Commercial Harbors 2025 Master Plan." 35.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 186, by adding a new item C.3. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "3. Support the expansion of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure at County facilities." 36.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 186, by adding a new item DA. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "4. Support the expansion of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure at strategically accessible locations along the main highway and other major thoroughfares." 37.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 201, by deleting item D.1. (and corresponding Appendix) (with renumbering as needed) as follows: "[1. Implement targeted and local hiring practices and invest in pre - apprenticeship training on development and infrastructure projects.] [2.] 1. Ensure low- income students receive quality public education through strategies including comprehensive, place -based cradle -to- career initiatives." 38. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 203, by amending item A.3. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: 15 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 "Support the use, expansion, and development of family childcare homes, preschools, parent /child kindergarten readiness programs, and charter schools." 39.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 203 as follows: [At the same time, funding limitations and current enrollment figures are obstacles in moving KCC toward university status. Another impediment to increasing student enrollment is the lack of student housing or dormitories.] On- campus housing would encourage neighbor island and out -of -state enrollment, and support the students and faculty who otherwise have long commutes. Although KCC has considered expanding its capacity with respect to on- campus housing and four -year university accreditation, there are no plans to pursue such changes in the near future. Nonetheless, the potential for expansion shall remain given the recent establishment of the Universitv Zoning District in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the SLUD boundary amendment from Agriculture to Urban." 40.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 204, by amending item C.7. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: "Support increased enrollment at [the] Kauai Community College and the development of supportive housing, transportation, and facilities for [student,] students, staff,, and faculty at the Puhi campus." PROPOSALS FROM THE OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS (10/04/2017) 41. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 44, Policy 12, as follows: "Traditional approaches of land use and resource management, including the understanding of water and watershed resources as public trust resources, promote our sense of place and [also] make environmental sense when seeking options that balance our growing community and the need to maintain healthy watersheds." 16 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 42.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 104 by adding a new item A.7., and amend corresponding Appendix, as follows: "7. Expressly and consistently condition development and subdivision approvals, building permits, and other discretionary approvals for actions that may impact surface water resources, on at least one of the following_ a. The prior implementation of updated instream flow standards and a monitoring plan for any surface water sources that are needed for any permitted project or development, when there is a reasonable possibility that public trust purposes are or may be harmed. b. Ground- or surface- water management area desiynation for any aquifer area where new or expanded water sources will need to be developed, when there is a reasonable possibility of harm to public trust purposes in either ground or surface waters. c. The explicit application and execution of the "framework" of analysis set forth by the Hawaii Supreme Court in the Kauai Springs case, prior to the issuance of any permit or other discretionary approval bathe county planning department, planning commission, or county council." (Note to editor: when amended language is added and underscoring is removed, retain underscoring of Kauai Springs case name.) 43.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 119 by adding a new section A and item A.1., with appropriate subsequent renumbering, and corresponding Appendix, as follows: "A. PERMITTING ACTIONS AND CODE CHANGES 1. Prior to the issuance of development and subdivision approvals, building_ permits, and other discretionary approvals for actions that may impact water sources that could also serve or impact the water needs of DHHL, consult with DHHL regarding their projected water needs and other rights to water under the public trust, such as those described or referenced under Hawaii State Constitution Art. XII § 1; Hawaii Revised Statutes §§ 168 -4, 171 -58, and 174C -49; Hawaiian Homes Commission Act §§ 220 and 221; and interpretive case law. [A.] B. PLANS AND STUDIES ... [B.] C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS... 17 of 18 ATTACHMENT 2 [C.] D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS..." 44.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 138, item B.3. (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: "Determine the sustainable yield of aquifer sectors through the Water Use and Development Plan[.],with appropriate reservations for public trust purposes including environmental protection, traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights, appurtenant rights, domestic water uses, and the needs of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands." 45. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 166 (and corresponding Appendix) as follows: "[Require] To the extent that public trust purposes would not be impacted or continue to be impacted, or where serviced ayricultural operations constitute a reasonable and beneficial use that furthers the interests of the public, require preservation of viable irrigation systems —both government -owned and privately owned —to support the supply of irrigation water to farms[.], provided that mitigation measures are taken to minimize any impacts to public trust purposes. GENERAL PROVISIONS 46. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 47.If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12 -13- 2017) \Planning Department Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for Planning Department_dmc.docx 18 of 18 ATTACHMENT 3 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER JOANN A. YUKIMURA AND COUNCILMEMBER MEL RAPOZO 2. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 3. If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\JY & MR Floor Amendment (Princeville Phase II) \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for JY and MR_dmc.docx loft PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S AMENDMENT POSITION (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending 5.0 Policy Maps, 5.2 Future Land Use Maps, Figure 5 -1 (Kaua`i Land Use Map) (page 225) and Figure 5 -7 (North Shore Land Use Map) (page 237) as attached (See Attachment 1) to remove the Resort Designation of "Princeville, Phase II" and to designate the area "Agriculture" or "Golf Course" (as noted) where present use exists. 2. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 3. If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\JY & MR Floor Amendment (Princeville Phase II) \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for JY and MR_dmc.docx loft Land Use Map - Kauai A TALHMENT 3 Attachment 1 ,z Ha'ena rincevi,lle l;_phio -ywY Hanalei Kilauea y x ° Anahola? FV Kealia pa`a. i Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Urban Edge Boundary Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) Hanapepe- `Ele'ele - Parks and Recreation Hanama ulu Kekaha Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) Homestead 000-14 University Zone Residential Community Plantation Camp - Urban Center Llhu'e _ - Neighborhood Center d Transportation Neighborhood General NawiIiwili Larne Town oQ South Kaua I , Alekoko Fishpond " \QC Ja``�� Kalaheo �`� WoiMjm? — rvoir Hanapepe • � Ele:ele ;..:tea 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles I 0 2.5 5 10 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Urban Edge Boundary Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) Small Town - Parks and Recreation Resort - Golf Course Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) Homestead 000-14 University Zone Residential Community Plantation Camp - Urban Center Industrial - Neighborhood Center d Transportation Neighborhood General Military Larne Town =0% Provisional Aericulture Land Use Map - North Shore H�'eO8 - Princeville � Honalei River—, ATTACHMENT Attachment 1 KlIcueo Lighthouse- AgriculmmPark Princeville Center ^ ~� Princeville Airpor dib ell f milesF Planning District Boundary Major Roads ---�� Roads Streams U3G34O ft. Contours Reservoirs Natural 4nricu|tura| Agricultural ���� Transportation Parks and Recreation Military Golf Course Homestead Residential Community e�xot Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Rp"nrt K-ilauea ' � 1in~2miles NORTH 2 4| ATTACHMENT 4 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER MEL RAPOZO 1 of 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S AMENDMENT POSITION (INFORMATIONAL ONL Y) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 387, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 115, item A.6. as follows: "[Design] When possible, encourage the design affordable residential projects with civic spaces, shade trees, and pedestrian/bicycle amenities to enhance livability, equity, and safe transit options, especially for children." 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 399, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 129, item B.4. as follows: "[Determine] Address the feasibility and practicality of accommodating luggage, surfboards, and other large objects on Count private buses." 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending Figure 5 -1 (Kaua`i Land Use Map) (page 225), Figure 5 -3 (Hanapepe- `Ele`ele Land Use Map) (page 229), and Figure 5 -4 (South Kauai Land Use Map) (page 231) as attached (See Attachment 1) to remove all reference to "provisional agriculture" and "provisional resort" and return the designated areas to "agriculture." 1 of 4 AT 1'ALHMENT 4 PROPOSALS FROM MALAMA MAHA`ULEPfJ 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled No position "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 393, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 176, by adding a new item A.9. as follows: "Preserve Mand'ulepu, a wahi pana, where scenic landmarks, natural resources, archaeological sites (including Waiopili Heiau), and burials are found along with subsistence fishing and gathering, agriculture, research and education, and recreation." 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 424, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 177, by adding a new item D.6. as follows: "Commence a collaborative planning effort to explore options that would make it possible to preserve the irreplaceable natural and cultural resources of Mand'ulepu and to sustain the special experiences of this place.' 6. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 209, by delating items A.4. and A.S. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "[4. Explore options for permanent public access to privately owned areas, such as the Maha`ulepu coastline. Consider use of conservation easements and other tools. 5. Manage access where necessary to preserve Mand'ulepu's natural and cultural resources and to ensure public safety. Consider providing a comfort station and visitor education resources on the rich natural and cultural heritage of the area.]" 2of4 Al "1'AC;HMENT 4 PROPOSALS FROM DR. MEHANA BLAICH VAUGHAN (11/27/2017) 7. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 44 as follows: "The health of our island is the health of our community, and it starts with protecting our watersheds. . . . Traditional approaches of land use and resource management promote our sense of place and also make environmental sense when seeking options that balance our growing community and the need to maintain healthy watersheds. Though current estimates show water withdrawals under maximum sustainable yield for much of the county, and though Kauai is not a regulated groundwater area, there are increasing concerns and questions regarding future availability of both surface and groundwater. This plan will need to be adapted to reflect updated projections in light of climate change and increasing evidence that groundwater withdrawals may reduce stream flow and vice versa. Water conservation and reuse, and stream restoration are kev measures to ensure sustainable water supply on our island in future." 8. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 97 as follows: "Water is held in trust by the state, for the benefit of the people. Public trust purposes, which receive priority over private commercial uses, include domestic uses, Native Hawaiian and traditional and customary rights, appurtenant rights, environmental protection, and reservations for the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands. Effective watershed management requires both landscape -scale conservation and site - specific mitigation all while balancing human uses with resource protection." 9. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices (e.g., page 384, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 104, by adding new items A.7., A.B., and 3 of 4 A`1 TAC:HMENT 4 A.9. as follows: "7. Support the protection, restoration, and enhancement of surface and subsurface water resources, stream habitats, and priority watershed areas to support: groundwater aquifer recharge; aquatic and environmental processes; riparian, scenic, recreational, and Native Hawaiian cultural resources; and constitutionally - protected Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices. 8. Support mauka to makai streamflow, which is essential to the survival of native stream life. 9. Support mediated agreements, such as that in Waimea, to restore streamflows to Wailua River, Hule`ia River, and others, while avoiding costly litigation." 10.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 421, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 151, by adding a new item DA., as follows: "4. Encourage expansion of programs and legislation Support supporting septic systems in place of cesspools located within 200 feet of a shoreline, perennial stream, or wetland." 11.If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 12.If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\MR Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for MR— dmc.docx 4of4 ATTACHMENT 4 Attachment 1 Land Use Map - Hanapepe, 'Ele`ele Olokele Sug Makaweli Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) Beach Park.. . \\ - Parks and Recreation �f Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort Plantation Camp 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Milesl I I 0 0.5 1 2 Industrial �¢ Transportation Military ATTACHMENT 4 Attachment 1 Land Use Map - Kaua`i Ha`ena Princeville . (� J `K- uh�ol)•Hwrv� J� Hanalei' `Kilauea Anahola North Shore East KOUa l � Kealia� Kapa'a Walmeah t( �� ��Wailua g o � �Gdi_. �� Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele Hanama'ulu Y~ Kekaha t <, LihWe Waimea,e ` �y �Naw liwili SouthiKaua i y %� Kalaheo Hanapepe • ,Ele'ele �Koloa - �y r Po ipu 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams Reservoirs Urban Edge Boundary Natural - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community - Urban Center - Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Agricultural - Large Town Agricultural OAL) _ . Small Town Resort Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) ME, University Zone - Plantation Camp Industrial }� Transportation Military Land Use Map - Koloa, Po`ipu, Kalaheo Park Kalah Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) A TAC HMEN`1' 4 Attachment 1 ro Waito Reservoir IrOma`o K ukLJ IQ; o:ipu �. - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community - Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General ® Large Town Small Tnwn Po'ipu Beach 7%- "I. 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.5 1 2 Resort Industrial �- Transportation Military ATTACHMENT 5 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER MEL RAPOZO (By Request) 1of17 PLANNING AMENDMENT DEPARTMENT'S (All based on proposals submitted by the POSITION Community Coalition of Kauai) (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) REFERNCES TO TEMPORARY MORATORIUM (language provided by the County Attorney, by request) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 30 by inserting a new section 1.2.4. as follows: "12.4 TEMPORARY MORATORIA AS AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL STRATEGY Throughout the General Plan process, concerns were raised over excessive, rapid, ill- planned growth. As a result, consideration of the moratorium technique to deal with this perceived planning emergency arose at during the planning meetings and the County Council hearings. There is a substantial body of law addressing the legal parameters of moratoria involving communities across the nation attempting to halt development, including but not limited to: water and sewage connections; subdivisions; site plans; annexations; multi - family, affordable housing, or residential development; planned unit development a rovals• re-zonings; condominium development or conversions; driveways; inns; medical marijuana dispensaries: mobile home park development; variance approvals; adult entertainment development; pawn shops, property conveyance; the opening of new businesses; industrial facilities: university expansion; wilderness outfitter permits, homes for the disabled; telecommunications facilities; high voltage power lines; 1of17 ATTACHMENT 5 piers and docks; windmills; signs and billboards; large structures; or simply building permit issuance. Generally, where such moratoria are directly linked to environmental emergency such as flood districts, an unhealthy sewage treatment system or the inability to finance facility expansion, such moratoria may survive judicial scrutiny. However, where the moratoria are not of limited duration, and not tied to a reasonable plan to permit and facilitate growth, they are subject to invalidation. Similarly, moratoria may be invalid as applied where administered in a discriminatory manner allowing exemption or preexisting claims of entitlement other than on an even - handed basis. The County of Kauai realizes that moratoria are drastic techniques. According to legal treatises on the matter, communities imposing moratoria should be aware that they may tend to discourage quality developments needed for tax -base enhancement and achievement of regional planning_ goals; deny needed housing; inflate existing housing_ prices, commercial rentals, and industrial property; and discourage industrial in- migration; while encouraging employment relocation from the community towards areas with cheaper land and available housing for workers. Nonetheless, when used appropriately they can be an important tool and may provide an appropriate interim measure to better plan for the future development of Kaua`i." 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 38 as follows: "GENERAL PLAN POLICIES AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION The General Plan is a direction- settinE. policv document. It is not intended to be regulatory. It is intended to be a guide for future amendments to land regulations and to be considered in reviewing specific zoning amendment and development applications. 2of17 ATTACHMENT 5 These policies are intended to guide the County in specific types of actions: making revisions to land use and land development regulations, deciding on zoning changes, preparing and adopting development plans and public facility plans, and preparing and adopting capital improvement plans. All actions and decisions undertaken by the County Council and the County Administration, including all County departments, agencies, boards, and commissions, shall be guided by the vision statement, policies, and the implementing actions of the General Plan. Ordinances and rules that relate to the following shall also be guided by the policies of the General Plan: (1) Development plans; 2) Public facility plans; (3 ) Land use policies and regulations, including but not limited to zone changes, zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, and SMA rules and regulations; (4) Site development and environmental regulations, such as grading and drainage regulations; and (5) The six -year Capital Improvement Program. All existing zoning amendment ordinances, including but not limited to all existing land use permits, and all existing subdivisions, shall continue to remain in effect following the enactment of the General Plan. Existing land use regulations, including, but not limited to, those in the Special Development Plans, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and the Subdivision Ordinance, shall continue to regulate the use of land within demarcated zoning districts until such time as the ordinances may be amended to be consistent with the General Plan. Notwithstanding adoption of the General Plan, land use permits and subdivisions shall continue to be subiect only to applicable ordinances and rules and regulations in effect at the time the application is accepted for processing Nineteen policies articulate the County's path forward toward meeting the community's vision and goals of sustainability, unique character, resilience, and equity. The policies address the critical issues and opportunities identified through the community process. They are not 3of17 ATTACHMENT 5 listed in order of priority, as all are important. These policies were the subject of a community wide survey that was completed by more than 1,000 respondents across Kauai, and indicated widespread agreement with the policy direction. Results of the survey are summarized in Appendix B." 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following (3.1.1. WAO NAHELE — THE UPPER WATERSHED): a. Amending page 99 by adding a new item A.3. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "3. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally- appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary to permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." b. Amending page 99 by adding a new item B.3. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "3. Conduct periodic environmental impact reports that analyze whether or not there are water shortages within the upper watershed." 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following (3.1.2. KAHAWAI — MIDDLE WATERSHED, DRAINAGE, AND FRESHWATER RESOURCES): a. Amending page 104 by adding a new item A.7. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: 4 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 "7. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally - appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary to permit comprehensive planning protection of environmental concerns." b. Amending page 104 by adding a new item B.4. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "4. Conduct periodic environmental impact reports that analyze whether or not there are water shortages within the middle watershed." 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following (3.1.3. KAHAKAI — COASTAL AREAS AND SHORELINES): a. Amending page 107 by adding a new item A.9. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "9. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally - appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary to permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." b. Amending page 107 by adding a new item B.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "6. Conduct periodic environmental impact reports that analyze whether or not there are 5of17 ATTACHMENT 5 environmental processes affecting the coastal areas and shorelines that necessitate revision of development regulations." 6. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following (3.3.2. COUNTY ROADS): a. Amending page 128 by adding a new item A.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "6. Study existing code provisions to determine if they provide adequate roads attendant to permitted development." b. Amending page 128 by adding a new item A.7. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "7. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally - appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." 7. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following (3.4.1. DOMESTIC WATER): a. Amending page 137 by adding a new item A.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "6. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally - appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. An 6of17 ATTACHMENT 5 temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary to permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." b. Amending page 138 by adding a new item B.4. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "4. Conduct periodic environmental impact reports that analyze whether or not there are water shortages affecting the ability to provide domestic water services." 8. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 140 (3.4.2. WASTEWATER, SEPTIC SYSTEMS, AND CESSPOOLS) by adding a new item A.S. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "5. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passa constitutionally - appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary to permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." 9. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 144 (3.4.3. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING) by adding a new item A.2. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "2. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally - appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. ALiy temporary 7of17 ATTACHMENT 5 moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." 10.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 191 (3.9.2. HAZARDS RESILIENCY) by adding a new item A.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "6. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, Does not support the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally -a appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." 11.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 195 (3.9.3. GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION by adding a new item A.10. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "10. If supported by adequate environmental impact data, Does not support the County Council may consider passage of constitutionally- appropriate temporary moratoria on development for a reasonable duration based on a reasonable necessity and a rational basis. Any temporary moratoria shall be linked to aggressive efforts to expand service capacity through a comprehensive capital facilities fund and committed budget, and no more drastic than necessary to permit comprehensive planning and protection of environmental concerns." 8of17 ATTACHMENT 5 THE WATERSHED 12.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 99 as follows: "Objective: [To conserve the upper watershed and restore native habitat and forested areas.] To protect the upper native forested watershed." b. Amending pages 99 -100 by amending item C.3. as follows: "Establish a [watershed task force or] watershed liaison within the County whose mission is to facilitate better communication and coordination between agencies and organizations that work in the watershed (County, State, and nongovernmental organizations), apple a western -based science and ahupua`a management model from mauka to makai." c. Amending page 130 by deleting item D.S. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "[Support the establishment of community based councils to assist with watershed management issues.] 13.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 101 as follows: "Objective: Within the mid - watershed area: 1) To protect, restore, and enhance freshwater resources to [support aquatic, environmental, and cultural resources;] conform with their natural hydrological function and flow within the watershed to o ra h and, 2) to recognize and mitigate 9of17 ATTACHMENT 5 impacts from the built environment to the mid - watershed area.] 2) To identify and restore traditional cultural access to and uses of freshwater resources; and 3) To identify and mitigate impacts from the built environment that are disruptive to the natural hydrology of the watershed and access to water as a cultural resource. b. Amending page 104 by adding a new item C.3. (appropriately renumbered as-needed), as follows: "Establish a watershed liaison within the County whose mission is to facilitate better communication and coordination between agencies and organizations that work in the watershed (County, State, and nongovernmental organizations), applyiny a western -based science and ahupua`a management model from mauka to makai." c. Amending page 104 by amending item D.2. as follows: "2. [Encourage collaborative watershed and stream protection through the efforts of non - profit and volunteer environmental groups, such as the Hanalei Watershed Hui and Kauai Watershed Alliance.] Support the establishment of community -based watershed councils, using ahupua`a as a u�gprincipal, to assist with watershed management issues." d. Amending page 104 by adding a new item D.6. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "6. Restore water flow to streams, such as the north fork of Wailua and Hule`ia, in order to uphold county obligations and public trust protections." 14. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 108, by adding new items D.6. and D.7. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: 10 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 "6. Support the establishment of community -based watershed councils, using ahupua`a as a guiding principal, to assist with watershed management issues." 7. Establish a watershed liaison within the County whose mission is to facilitate better communication and coordination between agencies and organizations that work in the watershed (County, State, and nongovernmental organizations), applying a western - based science and ahupua`a management model from mauka to makai." ECONOMY — TOURISM 15.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled No position "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 157 as follows: "[On Kauai, ADVC has been slowly growing at an average rate of about 2% per year since 2000, with a slight dip due to the economic recession of 2008 -2009 (Figure 3 -9).] Since 2010, the ADVC has grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 4.0% per year. (2010 ADVC: 19,548 (Figure 3 -9); 2016 ADVC: 24,797 (Table 3 -3)). If growth were to continue at that rate by 2035, the ADVC would increase by 112% to 52,600." 16.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 160 by adding a new item B.2. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "[Explore development of a maximum annual visitor carrying capacity.] Establish the carrying capacity for the island and various sites around the island and implement a monitoring system that tracks visitor impacts within the context of "limits of acceptable change" or other metric." b. Amending page 160 by adding a new item B.3. (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: 11 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 "Create a comprehensive incentive and disincentive plan to address visitor numbers and impacts in specific areas." ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 17.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled No position "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 180 as follows: "Objective: To increase energy [self - sufficiency] sustainability and maintain a reliable, resilient, and cost - efficient energy system." 18.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 181 by amending A.4. as follows: "Require new buildings to incorporate economically feasible design and equipment [to save energy.] for energy sustainability, including but not limited to: solar hot water capacity and proper insulation." b. Amending page 181 by amending C.2. as follows: "Pursue green energy conservation, including but not limited to: groundskeeping and farming equipment /machinery, and ground transportation [energy conservation and alternative fuel projects.], by. a. Installing more, and regularly maintaining and repairing, electric vehicle charging stations. b. Introducing residential and commercial incentives to transition to electric groundskeeping and farming equipment /machinery. 12 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 c. Countv transition from fuel powered to electric vehicles, machinery, and equipment, where feasible." c. Amending page 181 by amending C.3. as follows: "[Review] Conduct regular reviews of County operations to identify ways to conserve energy, particularly during nighttime hours." 19.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 182 as follows: "Objective: To [acknowledge the human contribution to global warming and reduce Kaua`i's greenhouse gas emissions.] expand strategies and mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on Kaua`i." 20. "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including No position all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 185 by amending A.3. as follows: "Accelerate the transition to alternative, carbon - free fuels in the ground transportation sector with regulations and policies that support electric vehicle adoption and other alternative fuel infrastructure[.] and support electric groundskeeping and farming equipment /machinery. b. Amending page 186 by removing the existing C.1. and C.2. and adding new items C.1., C.2., and C.3. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "[1. Support a methane and biogas capture and containment project at the Kekaha Landfill. 2. Support carbon offset projects, such as growing trees to sell as carbon credits.] 1. Establish capture and containment of methane at all landfills and County waste facilities. 13 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 2. Adopt a county -wide zero -waste strategy, including but not limited to: recycling pick -up at households and public locations and events, and building and maintaining a materials recovery facility with staff assigned to locate markets for recycled material." c. Amending page 186 by amending D.3. as follows: "Increase the availability of [building energy performance information] information about buildings that are energy- efficient (e.g'., with solar hot water, green building designs and materials, and KIUC's household energy audit) around the island for both the residential and commercial sectors." CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 21.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 136 as follows: "Objective: To ensure water [infrastructure is planned to accommodate domestic needs and protect the public trust.] sustainability for Kaua`'s water needs under the Public Trust Doctrine and based on traditional ahupua`a methods of preserving water for future generations —not taking more than is needed and leaving enough for everyone. 22. Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including No position all Appendices, by amending page 137 by amending A.S. as follows: "Conduct an audit of the County's [development standards to identify regulations that are obstacles to green infrastructure practices.] dependency on surface water regarding future development, based on legal availability and water regulations." 23. Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including Support all Appendices, by amending all of the following: 14 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 a. Amending page 138 by amending B.3. as follows: "[Determine the sustainable yield of aquifer sectors through the Water Use and Development Plan.] Update sustainable yield of aquifers, incorporating most recent United States Geological Survey (USGS) low -flow studies and surface water data into the County Department of Water budget." b. Amending page 8 (ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS) by appropriately inserting the acronym for USGS as follows: "USGS United States Geological Survey" 24. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 138 as follows: "Objective: [To mitigate the impact to Kaua`i's fresh and ocean waters from wastewater.] To preserve and protect our fresh and ocean waters and other water resources from wastewater and other pollutants with a og al of eliminating ineffective water body quality standards." 25. Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including Does not all Appendices, by amending all of the following: support a. Amending page 140 by amending A.2. as follows: "Manage wastewater treatment and disposal in a manner that safeguards human [and environmental health, accommodates future growth, is efficient and cost effective, and uses recycled water from treatment where possible.] health and prevents environmental degradation while accommodating current needs of local residents before any consideration of future growth. These systems are to be efficient and cost - effective, and use recycled water from treatment where possible." 15 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 b. Amending page 141 by amending C.1. as follows: "[Expand existing wastewater treatment systems to existing communities where possible, with a focus on expanding the Wailua Wastewater Treatment Plant to the Wailua House Lots area.] Locate and relocate wastewater facilities in appropriate geo raphic areas, based on traditional, cultural, and biolo ,-ical natural filtration systems for the optimization and expansion of wastewater systems and system improvement, considering alternative reclamation technology or tertiary treatment." 26.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled No position "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 141 as follows: "Objective: To provide environmentally -sound waste disposal and collection services[.] with a goal to reduce the solid waste stream by 70 percent." 27. Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including No position all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 144 by amending CA. as follows: "Divert at least 70 percent of solid waste [from landfill sites to recycling and reuse by 2023.] through increased source reduction, recycling, biodiversion, and landfill diversion methods." b. Amending page 144 by adding a new C.7. (with appropriate renumbering as needed), as follows: "Provide commercial volume -based collection with enhanced recycling programs, including incentives for businesses to adopt zero -waste collection programs. 28.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 144 as follows: 16 of 17 ATTACHMENT 5 "Objective: [To support the modernization and user - friendliness of Kaua`i's airports and harbors.] To ensure airport and harbor improvements are in balance with the need to manage tourism impacts and keep visitor arrivals at reasonable levels." 29. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 30. If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\MR CCK Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for MR re CCK_dmc.docx 17 of 17 ATTACHMENT 6 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER MEL RAPOZO (By Request) AMENDMENT PLANNING (Based on proposals submitted by the DEPARTMENT'S Community Coalition of Kauai POSITION relating to Affordable Housing) (INFORMATIONAL ONLY) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 10, by adding a new (all items) definition (appropriately alphabetized as needed), as follows: "NNAHU means Net New Affordable Housinz Unit. NNAHUs are calculated by taking the number of affordable units newly created during a given time period minus the number of affordable units lost in any manner during that period. Rental and owner - occupied affordable units are calculated separately. New affordable units may include conversions of existing buildings (in whole or in part) into affordable units, such as commercial spaces converted into affordable residential units, "in -law" apartments, or ADUs on existing residential lots." 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 114 as follows: "Affordable housing refers to housing (both rental and owned) where no more than 30% of household income is required for direct housing costs and no more than 50% of household income is required for total housing costs (including related costs of transportation, utilities, insurance, maintenance reserve, etc.). Government - sponsored or assisted affordable housing refers to those projects funded through County support, Federal tax credits, and /or imposition on developers." 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 114 as follows: ATTACHMENT 6 "Objective: To increase affordable housing opportunities by establishing and maintaining sufficient affordable housing, both for purchase and for rental, for low to moderate and middle income [households.] residents on Kauai " 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices, by amending page 115 by adding a new section 1.3 as follows: "In addition to moving forward with Lima Ola, the County should acquire land with access to transit, water, and wastewater service for future project development. 1.3 Rapidly Eliminate and Prevent Affordable Housing Deficits A new and better approach must be used to produce a better result. The 2000 General Plan had a good description of the affordable housing problem as of 2000 and a stated a widespread desire throughout Kauai to give priority to fixing that problem. However, despite good intentions expressed in the 2000 General Plan, the affordable housing problem of 2000 turned into a crisis over the years since 2000. Kauai was and is not alone in this crisis, and fortunately other areas have developed and used systems of "best practices" that demonstrate successful approaches to resolving and preventing a lack of affordable housing. Adaptive management is a key systems methodology in successful best practices. Another successful practice utilized elsewhere is that whenever a severe affordable housing deficit occurs, declare an emergencv and invoke special powers to rapidly resolve the emergency. By adopting appropriate proven best practices and innovating new paths to success for unique aspects of the affordable housing crisis on Kauai, rapid elimination of Kauai's affordable housing deficit within three to five years can be reasonably expected. Proactive monitoring of appropriate indicators and adaptive management can prevent affordable housing_ deficits from occurring by actions such as outlined in action C.1. below." ATTACHMENT 6 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 115, by adding a new item C.1. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "1. Rapidly eliminate the affordable housing deficit crisis by year -end 2020 through the addition of sufficient Net New Affordable Housing Units (NNAHUs) by following actions: a. Establish an Affordable Housing Task Force with the following_ goals, and give it emergency powers whenever an affordable housing deficit occurs or is predicted to occur within five years. In the event of a deficit, the Mayor may declare an affordable housing emergency and establish an "Affordable Housing Emergency Task Force" with a mandate and all necessary resources and special powers to resolve the deficit within one year. In the case of the large accumulated deficit of 1,400 units as of 2017, the elimination deadline may be extended to three wears. These special powers shall include but not be limited to: modification or waiver of regulations, rules, and procedures that impede the creation of NNAHU sufficient to meet the objective of affordable housing for the majority of Kauai residents. (These housing emergency powers have precedent in the housing emergency declarations by the Governor of Hawaii and by the Mayor of Hawaii County, as well as maw of cities elsewhere. There is also precedent for such powers and incentives related to affordable housing in various State legislation such as: HRS 201 -H, Important Agricultural Lands (IAL), and the proposed Sustainable Living Experimental Permit legislation that passed both Houses of the Hawaii State Legislature.) b. Proactively prevent affordable housing deficits and maintain an equitable, stable, and sustainable affordable housing market for both rental and ownership. Based on present data, this requires the ATTACHMENT 6 _year, for a total of 9,000 NNAHUs on Kauai between 2018 and 2035. This data of total existing affordable housing unit inventory and NNAHUs should be monitored, updated, and published quarterly. [1] 2. Complete the Lima Ola affordable housing project." 6. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 7. If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\MR Housing Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for MR re CCK Housing_dmc.docx A`l "1'ALHMENT 7 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER JOANN A. YUKIMURA AMENDMENT (Restoration of boundary between Hanapepe `Ele`ele and South Kauai Districts as it existed in 2000 General Plan) PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S POSITION (INFORMATIONAL ONLY 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending the following figures as attached (See Attachment 1) to effectuate restoration of the Hanapepe- `Ele`ele district boundary as it existed in the 2000 General Plan: • Figure 2 -2 (Planning Districts and Place Types) • Figure 3 -11 (Kaua`i Visitor Destination Areas) • Figure 3 -16 (Social Equity Map) • Figure 5 -1 (Kaua`i Land Use Map) • Figure 5 -3 (Hanapepe- `Ele`ele Land Use Map) • Figure 5 -4 (South Kauai Land Use Map) • Figure 5 -10 (Hanapep6- `Ele`ele Heritage Resource Map) • Figure 5 -11 (South Kauai Heritage Resource Map) • Figure 5 -17 (Hanapepe- `Ele`ele Hazard Map) • Figure 5 -18 (South Kauai Hazard Map) • Figure 5 -22 (Kaua`i Island Infrastructure Map) • Figure 5 -24 (Hanapep6- `Ele`ele Infrastructure Map) • Figure 5 -25 (South Kauai Infrastructure Map) • Figure 5 -29 (Kaua`i Island Public Facilities) • Figure 5 -31 (Hanapepe- `Ele`ele Public Facilities) • Figure 5 -32 (South Kauai Public Facilities) • Figure 5 -36 (Kaua`i Island -Wide Transportation Map) 2. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 3. If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\JY Hanapepe - Eleele Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for JY Hanapepe - Eleele Boundary_dmc.docx 1of1 ATTACHMEN`' 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Place Types Map - Kauai y,: Kiiauea ,Hanalei R: _ 'Anahola ...,� Anahola North Shore Cpl .: Town Center Arm � 1 ✓.� �. _ �Ka pah'i.. East Kaua`1 Kapa`a Wa i l u a _ _ Hanama'ulu -�� Hanapepe Kapaia' "Ele'ele Uhu e 'Kekaha f 1 Puhi Waimea Nawiliwi I South Kauai '11g Pakala Village Kalaheo _ O Hanapepe; ma o f &= Ele`ele Koloa Kaumakani Lawa'i Numila Kukui`ula P. o' 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles) r ------- ..__ -. -_ 0 2.5 5 10 Large Town Small Town Village Crossroads w Plantation Camp Planning District Boundary Visitor Destination Area Map - Kaua`i 4 North Shore Waimea h onapepe- 'Ele`ele Lihu`e South Kaua'i NORTH 1 in = 5 miles Miles 0 2.75 5.5 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Visitor Destination Areas a ATTACHMEN Y 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Social Equity Map - Kaua`i ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 _ Princeville Kilauea Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads • Priority Equity Area Impoverished Population % 2.6% - 5% 5.01 % - 10% ® 10.01 % - 15% ►�,,�,�, 15.01% 20% , 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Minority Race % - <35% 35.1% - 50% 50.1%-65% - 65.1% - 80% - 80.1% - 100% Land Use Map - Kaua`i ^! Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams Reservoirs ....... Urban Edge Boundary Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) AT 1'ACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 0.01 fl"�� a 7 Pcince-ville, Hanalei Kilauea Ana Ke5li Kapa"a E. �Wailua�. J/r fib` C >, -= f Hanama'ulu Y % Lihu'e South Kai,ia S `� i Kalaheo Hanapepe" 1 •\ ?,rEle e el _ Parks and Recreation V� Golf Course Homestead Residential Community Urban Center Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General - Large Town Small Town OKI � =0 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Resort Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) E, University Zone - Plantation Camp Industrial _ Transportation - Military `� Provisional Agriculture AT 1'ALHMEN`l' 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Land Use Map - Hanapepe, 'Ele'ele Makaweli d4 ��d /�ti Hanapepe Heights` K�a�umakani Lima Ola Hanapepe Workforce Housing OlokeleSugarMill — � El,e'ele o Halewili�Rd /Salt Pond 'Port Allen er Beach Park 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.5 1 2 �` Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation fGolf Course Homestead Residential Community Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General Resort - Plantation Camp Industrial - Transportation - Military SON Provisional Agriculture A TALHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams Reservoirs Natural Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation TGolf Course Homestead Residential Community - Neighborhood Center Neighborhood General - Large Town Small Town Resort Industrial Transportation Military �� Provisional Agriculture ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Heritage Resources Map - Hanapepe, `Ele`ele y ":Kaumakani a' Hanapepe Sugar Mill fir, wp Salt Pond--I '- Beach Park t}- Port Allen Registered Historic Sites E State E National ■ State & National • Cultural Features o Priority Public Access Points ♦ Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies — Major Roads Roads — Trails Planning District Boundary O Ahupua'a Boundaries Wetlands D Coral Reefs Regulated Fishing Areas State & County Parks Q Preserves Reservoirs 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Traditional Cultivation Areas Sand Dunes Open Space Acquisition Priorities i Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species High Density F\\�\ Very High Density ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Registered Historic Sites E State E National ® State & National • Cultural Features o Priority Public Access Points /► Fish Ponds Streams & Waterbodies Major Roads Roads Koloa Scenic Byway Trails Planning District Boundary D Ahupua'a Boundaries Wetlands D Coral Reefs I• Regulated Fishing Areas State & County Parks Q Preserves M Reservoirs Traditional Cultivation Areas M Sand Dunes M Open Space Acquisition Priorities M Critical Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species High Density Very High Density AT 1'ALHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Hazards Map - Hanapepe, 'Ele'ele d Hanapepe Heights 4� y Kaumakani Hanapepet� 01okele 'Ele'ele Sugar Mill ! Hale, 00/0 W�i�'�'Q Workforce Housing Salt Pond_ 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Beach Park Port Allen s ..75 3 Critical Facilities • Airports • Civic Centers • Harbors • Schools Correctional Centers Electric Facilities Hospitals Landfill Wastewater Treatment Plants Dams A Emergency Shelters Streams Major Roads Roads Tsunami Evacuation Zone ExtremeTsunami Zone High Risk Flood Zone - Moderate Risk Flood Zone Wildfire Risk Rating High Medium Low Hazards Map - Koloa, Po`ipu, Kalaheo i VI Kalawai Park Kalaheo 1 J, a`o M ��' J • Koloa l ca _ r KuWVula Critical Facilities • Airports • Civic Centers • Harbors • Schools Correctional Centers • Electric Facilities Hospitals Landfill Wastewater Treatment Plants Po`ipu Beach Park Dams Emergency Shelters Streams Major Roads Roads Tsunami Evacuation Zone ExtremeTsunami Zone Al" 1'AC;HMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 �Waito Reservoir 1 in = 2 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.75 1.5 3 High Risk Flood Zone - Moderate Risk Flood Zone Wildfire Risk Rating High Medium Low ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Infrastructure Map - Kauai Ha'ena j Princeville Ku3W6Hwv Hanalei Kilauea Y Anahola North Shore East Kauai Kealia Ka pa'a d " Waimeaailua , fl- a Lihu'e = o Hanapepe- 'Ele'ele Hanama'ulu Kekaha L ) L1 u'e Waimea South Kaua'i ��Y Nawiilliwili Kalaheo Hanapepe El r e;ele \Koloa Po'i pu A 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Landfill Private Wastewater Service Area • Power Plants State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands • Waste Water Treatment Plant Planning District Boundary Private Water System Service Area Major Roads County Water System Service Area Roads County Waste Water System Service Area Infrastructure Map - Hanapepe, `Ele`ele Hanak 4d/ / yam` Kaumz Olokele Sugar`IVlill Salt Pond— Beach Park Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station A Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center Al "1'ACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area Waste Water Facilities • Waste Water Treatment Plant Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines County Waste Water Cvctom rorviro Aron c 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Miles I I 0 0.75 1.5 Electric Facilities • Power Plants State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Infrastructure Map - Koloa, Po`ipu, Kalaheo Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station A Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area Waste Water Facilities • Waste Water Treatment Plant r. Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines County Waste Water Svstem Service Area Electric Facilities • Power Plants State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Kalawai Park Kalaheo - a "Oma'o Waito Reservoir ° 5W `i Koloa r' v 'w ' Kukuiula� °� Po'ipu fl. Po'ipu Beach Park- 1 in = 2 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.75 1.5 3 Solid Waste Management Facilities Drop -off Recycling Center ■ Refuse Transfer Station A Green Waste Diversion Site Deposit Beverage Container Redemption Center Water Facilities Private Water System Service Area County Water System Service Area Waste Water Facilities • Waste Water Treatment Plant r. Sewer Pump Stations Sewerlines County Waste Water Svstem Service Area Electric Facilities • Power Plants State Land Use District Urban Designated Lands Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Public Facilities Maa - Kaua`i M W i ®° 1 Ha`ena Princeville K•uh�� y Han alei Kilauea Anz blr7 Shore. - Eost Koub'i ( \%/ Kapa. `Wailua Hanama'ulu Y Nppe- 'El (e= Kekah'a. Waimea - - South'Kauo ; X\ S. iwiliwili �— Kalah�eo Hanapepe eI �/ -r s EIe; ea Y ;� Koloa Po' ipu Miles I L 0 2.5 Neighborhood Centers �= Post Offices ® Schools 0 Police Stations Harbors © Hospitals 0 Civic Centers Miles I L 0 2.5 1 in = 4 miles NORTH 5 10 Roads Correctional Centers © Airports © Fire Stations - Parks and Recreation Planning District Boundary ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone Major Roads 1 in = 4 miles NORTH 5 10 Roads Public Facilities Map - Hanapepe, `Ele`ele Olokele ATTACHMENT 7 ATTACHMENT 1 r•X ti i wo`� `R � Hanapepe Heights —V 'Kaumakani' HanapePe� �� � Heights >ugar Mi11I Hanapepe ' x,�mN e 'Ele'ele'``~ Na�a�P petR�- Lima Oal \ r• WnrkfnrrP'Hnucinn �►�� Salt Pond' Beach Park Port Allen 1 in = 1 miles NORTH \ Miles 0 0.5 1 2 U Neighborhood Centers [W Correctional Centers Roads E Post Offices © Airports Schools (3 Fire Stations Police Stations Parks and Recreation Harbors Planning District Boundary © Hospitals ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone El Civic Centers Major Roads Al" 1'ACHMEN`1' 7 ATTACHMENT 1 H Neighborhood Centers Post Offices Schools Police Stations Harbors Hospitals Civic Centers MJ Correctional Centers © Airports Fire Stations - Parks and Recreation Planning District Boundary ExtremeTsunami Evacuation Zone Major Roads Roads ATTACHMENT 7 Transportation Roadway Map - Kauai ATTACHMENT 1 Planning District Boundary Scenic Corridors Major Roads Roads Existing Shared Use Path Future Shared Use Path Improvements to Existing Roads Future Roads ATTACHMENT 8 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER JOANN A. YUKIMURA AMENDMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S POSITION (INFORMATIONAL ONL 1) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: (Supports all except a. Amending page 32 as follows: 10 —no position and "Kaua`i is a place where housing for all ages and 21 —does not income levels is integrated into the fabric of each support) community, and where people can live close to work and [recreational opportunities.] services." b. Amending page 112 as follows: "The complexity of the housing crisis must be addressed on multiple levels if Kauai is to achieve its vision and become a place where housing for all ages and income levels is integrated into all communities and located close to work and [recreation.] services." 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 60 as follows: "In Table 2 -2 Major Changes by Planning District amend the following text in the "North Shore" row: Resort designation makai of highway [limited by Action A.4. Permitting Actions and Code Changes under the Tourism subsection of the Economy sector.] removed and changed to Ayriculture." Iof11 ATTACHMENT S 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 61 as follows: "The previous General Plan utilized ... It is critical that the County focus land entitlement approval in these areas. Properly implemented, Urban Growth Boundaries provide a helpful tool for ensuring compact development. Henceforth when Community Plans are developed and adopted, each community plan shall establish an Urban Edge Boundary to delineate the extent of future town expansion. In the process of identifying a boundary, the Planning Department shall conduct a build -out analysis of the existing urban footprint and use the principles of smart growth to ensure that there is enough room within the boundary for growth desired by the community but the new growth will not sprawl onto agricultural lands or in a pattern that will make poor use of scarce resources." 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending pages 90 -91 as follows: "The Resort designation over the plateau makai of the Prince Golf Club [remains yet limited to an immediate window to seek resort - related zoning approvals pursuant to in Actions by Sector, VI Economy, Section 1 Permitting Actions.] was removed due to the community's desire to not expand the existing Princeville Visitor Destination Area boundaries." 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 112, as follows: "[New development and an inclusionary zoning ordinance have not improved the situation.] The lack of housing supply has been due in part to the effects of the Great Recession of 2007 -2009. For almost 10 years, large -scale private development of housing has been nonexistent. Only high -end individual homes and several County - sponsored affordable housing projects were built (due to reduced land prices or prior inclusionary zoning re uirements. ) For that reason the County's inclusionar 2of11 ATTACHMENT 8 zoning ordinance adopted in 2008 has had little occasion to be applied." 6. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 113, as follows: "[Compounding the problem is population growth that continues to out -pace housing supply.] Spurred by internal and external population growth, the growing number of households continues to outpace housing development. [Since 2000, Kaua`i's population increased by over 10,000 and yet only 5,000 units were added to the housing inventory between 2000 - 2014.]" 7. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 115 as follows: "1.2 Supporting [County -Led] County Sponsored or Required Affordable Housing Programs and Projects In contrast, locally established and funded programs can be customized to serve those who fall between the Federal programs and market -rate units. The Agency also plays a key role in developing affordable rental projects. A major source of capital for these projects is the Federal Low - Income Housing Tax Credit, which incentivizes the use of private equity through public - private partnerships. The tax credit provides a dollar -for- dollar reduction in the developer's federal income tax. However, use of these credits are limited to housing for families with incomes equal to or less than 60% of the median income and are limited in availability through a very competitive Statewide process. Development subsidies also come from development grants and loans. The County's Housing and Community Development Revolving Fund reinvests income from federal rg ant programs in housing projects and first -time homebu er mortgages. These ca ital investments will be 3of11 ATTACHMENT 8 repaid to the revolving fund which provides long -term support for County housinzprograms. Federal HOME and CDBG funds also support affordable housing development. To receive federal CDBG grants, HOME program funds and other federal funding, the County is required to prepare and update a Five -Year Consolidated Plan that addresses housing and community development needs and establishes funding` priorities. Other sources of funds include USDA Rural Development programs, private foundations, State CIP funds, and County Bond funds. While the construction of new affordable housing is needed, the preservation and rehabilitation of existing affordable housing is equally important. The County should ensure that the affordability of subsidized housing is preserved for the longest term possible. Also, it is generally less expensive to rehabilitate existing affordable housing than to construct new housing. Rehabilitation of existing housing supports and improves existing neighborhoods, and can also provide energy efficient upgrades to units. Through active partnerships with landowners and affordable housing developers, the Housing Agency has helped move forward several 100% affordable housing projects in Lihu`e, Hanama`ulu, Princeville,. and Koloa- constructing over 300 affordable rental units since 2000." 8. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 115, item A.S. as follows: "5. Preserve the life of existing affordable housing stock[.] for as long as possible." b. Amending page 115 by adding a new item A.7. as follows: "7. For county- s sponsored housing subsidized with 4of11 ATTACHMENT 8 affordable for the life of the building and the land to remain in county ownership in perpetuity" 9. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 387, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 115, item A.6. as follows: "Design affordable, energy- efficient residential projects with civic spaces, shade trees, and pedestrianibicycle amenities to enhance livability, equity, and safe transit options, especially for children." 10.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled No position "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 121 as follows: "Objective: To reduce KauaTs population of [those] houseless persons by 75 percent of the 2017 level by 2035. [and at risk for houselessness.]" 11.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 121, item C.2. as follows: "[Prevent houselessness and reduce the time spent being houseless by providing a continuum of safe and affordable housing opportunities and supportive programs.] The Mayor and the County Housing Agency shall work with the State of Hawaii Department of Human Services and nonprofit community to implement a robust Housing First program that provides 24/7 wrap- around services and makes available transitional and permanent housing for all houseless persons who desire such housing_" 12.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 389, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 125, item A.1. as follows: "Coordinate [transportation planning with land use] land use planning with transportation to minimize the impact of growth on congestion, improve walkability in town centers, revitalize commercial areas, and enhance 5of11 ATTACHMENT 8 mobility in places where people live, work, learn and play." 13.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 389, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 125, item A.2. as follows: "[Require that transportation impact analysis reports and other traffic studies analyze a project's potential to encourage mode shift.] Require that the traditional traffic impact analysis report be modified to include an analysis of regional transportation impacts, an assessment of a project's potential to encourage mode shift and an identification of mitigating measures as well as the public cost of unmitigated impacts." 14.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 406, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 126, by adding a new item CA. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "4. Consider implementing, Transportation Demand Management strategies with County of Kauai employees who work in Lihu`e as a pilot program that can be replicated by other employers. Strategies may include the following: a. Staggered work hours; b. Bulk rate bus passes; and c. Incentives to encourage commuting by other than single - occupancy vehicles." 15.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 126, item B.4. by adding appropriately- numbered footnotes (�) to read as follows: "In collaboration with HDOT, develop a process to apply "least cost planning "* and "practical design' into transportation planning and projects with a focus on congestion management for Kuhi6 Highway and Kaumuali`i Highway. Select a pilot project to test the process and outcomes." 6of11 ATTACHMENT 8 "Least-Cost Transportation Planning" https : / /www.vtpi.org /tdm /tdm2l.htm. TDM Encyclopedia, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Updated July 18, 2017 * "Brief. Overview of Performance -Based Practical Design P( BPD)„ https : / /www.fhwa.dot.gov /design/pbpd /documents /pbpd brief .cfm. Federal Highway Administration, Updated June 27, 2017" 16.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 406, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 126, by adding a new item D.7. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "7. Regularly evaluate and update Council - determined land transportation user fees, such as bus fares, registration, and fuel and vehicle weight tax rates." 17.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 126, item D.1 (with renumbering as needed) as follows: "[As a percentage of total trips, increase transit trips to 3.6 %, walk trips to 11.5 %, and bicycle trips to 7.6% by 2035, compared to baseline 2010 data of 0.4% for transit, 4.5% for walk, and 2.0% for bicycle trips.]" b. Amending page 125 as follows: "Objective: To safely and efficiently move people and goods [with a choice of transportation options.] about Kauai by creating a more multimodal land transportation system. As a percentage of total trips, increase transit trips to 3.6 %, walking trips to 11.5 %, and bicycle trips to 7.6% by 2035 using 2010 data as a baseline.]" 18.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including 7of11 ATTACHMENT 8 all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G – Action Matrix), by amending page 126, by adding a new item C.3. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "3. Incorporate and integrate transit strategies in the Kapa`a Transportation Solutions framework. [3.] 4. Following a priority evaluation process, complete priority circulation and multimodal capacity projects identified in the General Plan Transportation Maps." 19. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 391, Appendix G – Action Matrix), by amending page 160, item A.1. as follows: "Revitalize— rather than expand —the existing [resort areas] Visitor Destination Areas in Po`ipu, Lihu`e, Wailua, Waimea and Princeville." 20. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 391, Appendix G – Action Matrix), by amending page 160, item A.3. as follows: "Do not expand existing Visitor Destination Area boundaries[ beyond resort - designated areas]." 21.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Does not "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including support all Appendices (e.g., page 391, Appendix G – Action Matrix), by amending page 160, by removing item A.4 and renumbering appropriately, as follows: "[4. Allow existing resort entitlements to build out and require any non - entitled resort - designated areas in this General Plan to attain full State and County zoning resort - related approvals by the year 2027, or within ten years of Community Plan approval if an area is conditionally designated.]" 22.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including 8of11 ATTACHMENT 8 all Appendices (e.g., page 391, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 160, item A.5. as follows: "[Require short - duration expiration dates should development not be constructed as permitted.] To prevent developers from sitting- on zoning permits, impose short - term e.�., 3 -5 years) sunset clauses on zoning permits to ensure timely buildout." 23. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 391, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 160 to delete item A.7. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "[Do not allow spot amendments that expand already - designated resort areas.]" 24.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 391, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 160, by adding a new item A.S. (appropriately renumbered as needed), as follows: "8. Create a regulatory system that ensures resort developers pay their own way by paying their fair share of system expansion for all public systems, including but not limited to land transportation improvements, housing, water, sewer, cables, and parks." 25.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., page 422, Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 160, item D.7. as follows: "[Promote sustainable tourism and educate visitors on the vulnerability of Kaua`i's environment.] Encourage tourism that provides eco- friendly and educational experiences, products, and services; leverages and supports local business and agriculture; relies less on cars; and embraces the rich historic and cultural foundation upon which Kaua`i's communities were built." 9of11 ATTACHMENT 8 26.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by changing the name of Sector VII from "Energy Sustainability" to "Energy Sustainability and Climate Change Mitigation" 27.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 16, by amending all of the following: a. Amending B.2. as follows: "Update and implement the [water inventory and management plan.] Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan." b. Amending B.4. as follows: "[Monitor and report on Kaua`i's agricultural activity to understand local food production trends and water source issues.] Create an agriculture database of key information and indicators that would enable the monitoring of agricultural progress and growth." c. Adding a new item B.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "Update and implement the Kauai Agriculture Strategic Plan." 28.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 202 as follows: "In addition, more lifelong learning and inter - generational education is needed, particularly for developing stronger and more supportive parenting. The County and Kaua`i's business community should work in concert with local K -12 schools to better prepare the next generation of the 21s' century workforce. In an effort to produce high school graduates with fundamental 10 of 11 ATTACHMENT 8 workforce -ready skills, local businesses and employers will partner with educators to provide teachers and students with training opportunities outside of the classroom. Also, educators should coordinate with local businesses and entrepreneurs to incorporate Kaua`i- sspecific learning opportunities into their DOE - approved curricula. This would expose high school graduates to the local job market and help develop interest in working and remaining on. island. By establishing these types of working relationships between K -12 programs and the economy, students can be encouraged to enter the local workforce and improve upon it." 29.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 216 as follows: "The performance measures, introduced in Table 4 -1, are tied to the sector objectives. [The draft measures were selected in part based on the accessibility of consistent baseline data. It is possible that future efforts will refine the performance measures or establish benchmarks.] An important next step will be an effort to refine the Support performance measures and establish benchmarks." 30. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 31.If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V:\AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\JY Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for JY_dmc.docx 11 of 11 A'1'TALHMENT 9 (December 13, 2017) FLOOR AMENDMENT Bill No. 2666, Update to the General Plan of the County of Kauai Introduced by: COUNCILMEMBER ARRYL KANESHIRO (By Request) 1of16 PLANNING AMENDMENT DEPARTMENT'S (Amendment of Planning Committee Chair POSITION Mason K Chock) (INFORMATIONAL ONL1) 1. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 60 (Table 2 -2 Major (Planning Changes by Planning District), by adding the following land supports all) use "Actions" to the "Llhu`e" District as follows, and amend Figures 5 -1 (Kaua`i Land Use Map) and 5 -5 (Lihu`e Land Use Map) as shown in Attachment 1: "New Residential Community added on mauka side of DHHL Wailua Lands (for consistency with DHHL's Kauai Island Plan 2004). New Neighborhood Center added on the mauka and makai side of DHHL Wailua Lands (for consistency with DHHL's Kauai Island Plan 2004)." 2. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 81 (Land Use Map Changes for Lihu`e) as follows: "Instead, the General Plan Urban Center designation is retained in those developable areas outside of designated Neighborhood Centers. Neighborhood Center & Residential Community on DHHL Wailua Lands To ensure consistency with the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) Kauai Island Plan (2004), neighborhood center was designated on the mauka and makai side of DHHL's Wailua lands. Residential .Community was also added on the mauka side of the 1of16 AT 1'ALHMENT 9 highway to reflect DHHL's vision for more beneficiary housing in this area. Natural Hazards and Climate Change Resilience in Lahu`e District" 3. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 101 as follows: "2.1 Understanding our Reliance on Aquifers and Streams Water is a public trust resource in Hawaii. The DLNR is responsible for managing water resources and water use statewide, including the protection of watersheds and natural stream environments. These management activities are guided by the State Water Plan, which includes five components: Water Resource Protection Plan, Water Quality Plan, State Water Projects Plan, Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan, and the County Water Use and Development Plan. The Kauai Water Use and Development Plan (WUDP) assesses the sustainable yield of the aquifer in relation to current and future water demands. The WUDP is currently being updated and will set forth polices to guide the County in its planning and management of water resources. Kaua`i's aquifer supplies the vast majority of our domestic water and is divided into three sectors that are comprised of 13 systems (see Figure 3 -2)." 4. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 103 as follows: "Resource use, waste disposal, sedimentation (as a result of deforestation), and changes in hydrology due 2of16 A`1 TACHMENT 9 to development, dams, and water diversions greatly impact watershed function and water quality. Kaua`i's drainage system is mostly natural — comprised of its streams and rivers. This system is complemented by structures such as irrigation ditch systems and flood protection levees along certain streams. Kauai does not have an islandwide drainage master plan, but has in place drainage standards that require new development to maintain storm runoff to pre - development rates. Drainage master plans for new development must conform the requirements of the Kauai County Storm Water Runoff System Manual. The Department of Public Works intends to focus on specific problem areas by developing strategic plans for flood -prone areas such as Hanalei, Nawiliwili, Kapa`a, Wailua, Po`ipu, and Kekaha. These plans would provide detailed analyses of the flood conditions and specify preventative and remedial actions. Nonpoint source pollution, commonly called polluted runoff, occurs ...." b. Amending page 104, by adding a new item A.7. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "7. Provide for the crossing of water courses by spanning rather than by culverts when possible, so that natural streambeds will not be altered." c. Amending page 104, by adding a new item B.4. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "4. Develop drainage master plans for flood -prone areas such as Hanalei, Nawiliwili, Kapa`a, Wailua, Po`ipu, and Kekaha." d. Amending page 104, by adding a new item C.3. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "Complete the update of the Kauai County Water Use and Development Plan." 3of16 ATTACHMENT 0 e. Amending page 104, by adding a new item D.6. and D.7 (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "6. Seek to prevent stream overflow in low -lying communities by maintaining natural drainageways and preventing the buildup of debris. 7. Support the update of the Hawaii State Water Plan components as they relate to Kauai, including the Water Resource Protection Plan, Water Quality Plan, State Water Projects Plan, and Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan." 5. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 173, item C.1. as follows: "Maintain the character of historic structures and bridges[.] by implementing best management practices that adhere to the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines when rehabilitating and /or renovating historically significant buildings and structures." 6. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 173, item D.1. as follows: "[Preserve] Support partnerships between the County of Kauai, KHPRC, the public, and various historical and archaeological organizations to preserve important historic buildings and structures that illuminate Kauai's history." 7. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 173, by adding a new item D.3. as follows: "3. Develop a County of Kauai standard operating procedure (S.O.P.) for engaging with SHPD and the "Section 106" and /or "HRS 6E" processes. Implement the 4of16 ATTACHMENT 9 S.O.P. to improve interagency coordination and communication between SHPD and the applicable County, State, and Federal agencies." 8. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 173, item D.1. as follows: "Work with the State Historic Preservation Division and KHPRC to educate landowners about the historic preservation review process." 9. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 177, by adding a new item D.6. (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: "6. During the "Section 106" and "HRS 6E" review processes, utilize cultural practitioners and community authorities on historic preservation to serve an advisory function and provide guidance on heritage and cultural issues. 1O.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 215 as follows: "Capital Improvements Program and Appropriations [The County's six -year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) can help guide the incremental investment consistent with the goals set forth in this plan. The CIP update process should include a review and incorporation of General Plan actions, particularly those identified as short term priorities, to ensure the County is making progress on its priority actions. Further, appropriations should also be evaluated in the context of what the community sees as the ideal future state.] The County's charter- mandated Six -Year Capital Improvements Program is a powerful tool for implementing jmplementing the General Plan because infrastructure 5of16 ATTACHMENT 9 and projects have a substantial impact on patterns of growth and development. The Program should be conducted and evaluated on an annual basis. The projects listed in the Program should reflect priorities, such as those projects necessary to facilitate critical needs like housing. Regional priorities for capital projects can be determined through community planning. The "Projects and Programs" actions in Chapter 3 provide broad guidance for project selection and development. The annual report should not be considered a "wish list" for departments but reflect realistic constraints given budgetary availability." 11.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 220 by amending the title of section 4.2.2., amending section 4.2.3., and adding a new section 4.2.4. as follows: 4.2.2 [COMMUNITY EDUCATION & CAPACITY BUILDING] TRACKING AND REPORTING ACTION IMPLEMENTATION [4.2.3 UPDATING THE GENERAL PLAN The Kauai County Code requires the County Planning Department to conduct a comprehensive review and update of the General Plan Update every ten years. In practice, that does not always happen, and even if it did, ten years is a long time when information and conditions are constantly changing. This plan aspires to be adaptable and responsive by building in a bi- annual review and reporting process that allows the County to take stock and keep a record of its progress, evaluate what's working and what's not, and consider how to change course or incorporate the best available information. The policies, actions, and Land Use Map may be updated in response to unexpected trends or new information. In this way, the General Plan can be a "living document. "] 4.2.3 COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING The State and County planning system is complex. From the State Land Use Districts to community plans, it can be 6of16 ATTACHMENT 9 land use laws, plans, and programs that comprise our planning system. Education, especially focused on youth, has the potential to increase the quality of input and the level of discussion on complex issues — especially where tradeoffs are involved. During the General Plan process, many community members expressed a desire to become more educated about land use planning. The Planning Department should continue working with schools to develop community planning curricula and should offer "Planning 101" seminars to coincide with the General Plan monitoring cycle. 4.2.4 UTILIZING AN ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND FEEDBACK LOOP TO CREATE "A LIVING PLAN" The Kauai County Code requires the Planning Department to conduct a comprehensive review and update of the General Plan Update every ten years. This benchmark is difficult to meet on a consistent basis and spans a time frame ill- suited to handle the rapid development of updated projections, new data sources, and changing conditions. Additionally, impact of emerging technology, such as autonomous vehicles, is never fully understood in the present but has the potential to rapidly transform communities. In this modern age, Kauai needs a more dynamic planning system. Adaptive Management is a process to counter uncertainty through: (1) monitoring, 2) iterative decision making, and (3) facilitation of course corrections. This process is implemented through the General Plan's Implementation and Feedback Loop. (Figure 4 -1). The General Plan aspires to be adaptive and responsive through an implementation program based on regular feedback through a transparent process. The Kakou Committee's biennial review will allow the County to take stock and keep a record of its progress, evaluate what's working and what's not, and incorporate the best available information. This will provide the basis for more frequent, timely, and proactive adjustments to the policies and implementation actions as needed. As a result, the General Plan can remain current and dynamic — "A Living Plan." 7of16 ATTACHMENT 9 12.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 220 by adding a new section "4.2.5 IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS" as follows: "4.2.5 IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS A. PERMITTING AND CODE CHANGES 1. Review all Special Management Area permits for consistency with the General Plan. 2. Review all discretionary County permits for consistency with the General Plan. 3. Review all changes in County Zoning Districts for consistency with the General Plan. 4. Review all boundary amendments to State Land Use Districts for consistency with the General Plan. 5. Complete a comprehensive and substantive update of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. B. PLANS AND STUDIES 1. Participate in the Five -Year State Land Use District Boundary Amendment Review. 2. Engage in more regular, focused updates of the General Plan that are topic- specific if deemed necessary by changing circumstances or recommended by the Kakou Committee. 3. Develop a community planning protocol to ensure the efficient and timely update of community and special area Plans. 4. Update the Hanapepe- `Ele`ele Community Plan. 5. Update the Waimea - Kekaha Community Plan. 6. Update the East Kauai Community Plan. 7. Update the North Shore Community Plan. C. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS 1. Convene the Kakou Committee to conduct a biennial review of implementation actions. 2. Refine the draft performance measures through a public process. 3. Utilize strategic planning processes and efforts to set targets related to the indicators. 4. Partner with other organizations and agencies to develop and report on indicators. 8of16 ATTACHMENT 9 5. Conduct the Six -Year Capital Improvements Program on an annual basis and review each proiect for consistency with the General Plan. 6. Increase the capacity of the Planning Department to Administer an ongoing General Plan implementation and monitoring program. D. PARTNERSHIP NEEDS 1. Develop programs to educate community members, including -youth, on land use planning in order to build community capacity_" PROPOSAL FROM LUKE EVSLIN 13.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending 3.0 Actions By Sector, Sector: VIII. Energy Sustainability, Section 2.3 (Addressing Air Travel and Transportation) (page 183) as follows: "While we have progressed with renewable energy production for electricity, we must address and find way to reduce or offset the fuel consumption of the transportation sector. Due to the rapid adoption of renewable energy by KIUC, 2015 marked the first year on Kauai where greenhouse gas emissions from ground transportation were higher than from electricity production. In order to support the General Plan's greenhouse gas reduction policy, Kauai must reduce ground transportation emissions by 100% by 2045, with county vehicles reaching that goal by 2035. Using 2045 as a goal aligns the transportation sector with the electricity sector, which is currently mandated by H.B. 623 to reach 100% renewable energy by 2045. Technological breakthroughs in electric vehicles and alternative fuels support emissions reductions, but until those technologies take hold and become affordable, reductions to fossil fuel consumption for transportation will largely depend on individuals changing personal travel patterns and behaviors." 9of16 Al "1'ALHMENT 9 PROPOSALS FROM DR. MEHANA BLAICH VAUGHAN (11/08/2017) 14.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 45, amending Policy #15 as follows: "It is understood as a resident, native or not, that Na Kanaka o Kauai are treasures to be respected[.] and that lands and resources must be protected for perpetuation of cultural practice." 15.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 46, amending Policy #16 as follows: "In addition, many community members continue to provide for themselves and their families through subsistence practices — [whether] fishing, hunting, or gathering of foods, materials, and medicines —[as it has] that been perpetuated for generations." 16.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 174 as follows: "There is a strong and growing commitment to [deepening awareness and knowledge of] perpetuating and spreading awareness of Native Hawaiian culture, stories, and practices." 17.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 176, item A.7. as follows: "Encourage [the] restoration, management, and [public] practitioner access [of] for significant cultural sites on private land. 18.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including 10 of 16 ATTACHMENT 9 all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 176, item A.8. as follows: "Encourage the restoration, management, and use of Kaua`i's fishponds and lo`i kalo." 19.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 176, item B.I. as follows: "[Acknowledge] Inventory and acknowledge the importance of archaeological sites and wahi pana during Community Planning processes." 20.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending page 177 as follows: "For example, [Crater Hill] Nihoku (Crater Hill) is an important coastal landform near Kilauea Town ...." 21.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 209, by adding a new item D.12. (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: "12. Promote access with kuleana through stewardship agreements, work days, jobs, and other means, to engage community members in caretaknig." 22.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G — Action Matrix), by amending page 209, by adding a new item C.2. (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: "2. Pursue easements, acquisitions, and landowner agreements to expand trails, access, open space, protection of coastal lands, and wilderness areas." 23.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including 11 of 16 ATTACHMENT 9 all Appendices (e.g., Appendix G – Action Matrix), by amending page 209, by adding a new item D.12. (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: "12. Promote access with kuleana through stewardship agreements, work days, jobs, and other means, to engage community members in caretaking." PROPOSALS FROM THE KAUAI WATERSHED ALLIANCE 24. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 98, as follows: "The threats include development, improper agricultural practices, invasive species, erosion, climate change, and natural hazards." 25. Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 99, as follows: "In 2011, the State launched "The Rain Follows the Forest " —a management initiative to sustain fresh water resources by doubling the amount of protected watershed area. State initiatives also include the Aloha+ Challenge and Governor Ige's "World Conservation Congress Legacy Commitment: 30 by 30 Watershed Forests Target" to protect 30% (253,000 acres) of Hawai`i's highest priority watershed forests by 2030." 26.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 99, as follows: "In 2003, the Kauai Watershed Alliance (KWA) was established to bring the State, County, private landowners, and nonprofit partners together to up rsue collaborative management practices to protect the upper native forested [watershed through collaborative management practices.] watersheds that have adapted to catching and holding- water and allow for perennial 12 of 16 ATTACHMENT 9 stream flow, maximum percolation as ground water, and reduced erosion downstream." 27.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 99, as follows: "Management activities include [outplanting,] planning, . strategic animal control, invasive weed control, monitoring of forest health, and constructing and maintaining protective fences. In alignment with the State's goal in "The Rain Follows the Forest" initiative, the KWA [Strategic] Management Plan calls for fencing and managing 25,000 acres in the next ten years." 28.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, page 99, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 99 by moving the existing paragraph to page 103 and adding the following in its place: "[Although the priority for conservation activity is the upper watershed, there is also a need to restore Kaua`i's native lowland forests which have been largely destroyed by human activity, wildfire, and invasive species. Reestablishment of native habitat could provide scenic values, cultural gathering areas, hiking and other recreational uses, and educational opportunities. Carefully managed forestry efforts also provide opportunities for green energy production, food forests, and materials for local manufacturing.] For the Wao Nahele —the Upper Watershed —to benefit from conservation efforts, the community should carefully consider the importance of balancing the sustainable use of this area with the sensitivity and uniqueness of these upper native forests. They have to -date survived the fate of our native lowland forests — destruction by invasive species, wildfires, and incompatible uses by humans. They have a rg eat value to all of us as they make up almost 50% of Kaua`i's land area." 13 of 16 ATTACHMEN`l' 9 b. Amending page 103 by relocating existing language from page 99 as follows: "Making Kaua`i's water quality everyone's kuleana ensures the greatest amount of vigilance to maintaining standards and preserving these irreplaceable resources for future generations (See Subsectors on Water and Agriculture in Chapter 3). Although the priority for conservation activity is the upper watershed, there is also a need to restore Kaua`i's native lowland forests which have been largely destroyed by human activity, wildfires, and invasive species. Reestablishment of native habitat could provide scenic values, cultural gathering areas, hiking and other recreational uses, and educational opportunities. Carefully managed forestry efforts also provide opportunities for green energy production, food forests, and materials for local manufacturing." 29.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending all of the following: a. Amending page 99 by moving the existing B.2. to become CA. (appropriately renumbered as needed) and adding the following in its place: "[Utilize best practice watershed management plans, such as the Hanalei Watershed Action Plan, as examples for other communities to employ.] Through appropriate county departments, support KWA members in the development of future watershed management plans and appropriate studies as needed for the health of the upper native forests." b. Amending page 100 by relocating the existing B.2. to become CA. (appropriately renumbered as needed) as follows: "4. Utilize best practice watershed management plans, such as the Hanalei Watershed Action Plan, as examples for other communities to emplov." 14 of 16 AT 1'ALHMENT 9 c. Amending page 99 by amending C.1. as follows: "Support projects that [restore] conserve and protect our remaining endemic forests and landscapes in the upper watershed." d. Amending page 100 by amending D.1. as follows: "[Improve] Support the management and protection of Kaua`i's forest resources and upper watershed areas in the Conservation District." e. Amending page 100 by amending D.2. as follows: "Support the State's [goal of doubling the amount of protected and managed watershed areas.] "World Conservation Congress Legacy Commitment: 30 by 30 Watershed Forests Target" to protect 30% (253,000 acres) of Hawai`i's highest priority watershed forests by 2030." f. Amending page 100 by removing D.S. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "[Support the establishment of community based councils to assist with watershed management issues.]" g. Amending page 100 (WAO NAHELE — THE UPPER WATERSHED) by removing D.S. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "[Support the establishment of community based councils to assist with watershed management issues.]" h. Amending page 104 (KAHAWAI — MIDDLE WATERSHED, DRAINAGE, AND FRESHWATER RESOURCES) by adding a new D.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "Support the establishment of community based councils to assist with watershed management 15 of 16 ATTACHMENT 9 i. Amending page 100 (WAO NAHELE — THE UPPER WATERSHED) by removing D.7. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "[Provide preferred tax status and other incentives to help community groups, non - governmental organizations, and government agencies restore native lowland forests.]" J. Amending page 108 (KAHAKAI — COASTAL AREAS AND SHORELINES) by adding a new D.6. (with appropriate renumbering as needed) as follows: "Provide preferred tax status and other incentives to help community groups, non - governmental organizations, and government agencies restore native lowland forests." 30.Amend Bill No. 2666 by amending the booklet entitled Support "Planning Commission Draft" dated "June, 2017," including all Appendices, by amending Figure 3 -3 (Hydrologic Cycle) by changing "Surface Runoff' to "Groundwater /Aquifer Recharge." 31. If any provision that is amended is also found elsewhere, such language is hereby amended to provide consistency. 32. If more than one amendment to a same section is adopted on this date, all amendments shall take effect to the extent there is no conflict. If there is a conflict, the latest amendment shall be controlling. (Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material to be added is underscored.) V: \AMENDMENTS \2017 \GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Bill No. 2666 (12-13 - 2017)\MC Floor Amendment \Bill 2666 (General Plan Update) FA for MC— dmc.docx 16 of 16 ATTACHMENT 9 ATTACHMENT 1 Land Use Map - Kaua`i Ha'ena Princewl l K -uhi0 Hwy ` Hanalei �- ?' Kilauea" Anahola t J �'' North Shore East Kauai _ � Kealia d Waimea Wailua a � � Hanama'ulu Y HGnapepe- 'Ele'ele Kekaha y Lihu`e "' Waimea e 3 Q� • oQ° South Kauai Z�'y Nawiliwili ` ��c Ja\\y� iekoko Fishpond Kdlahe0 ��F Waito Reservoir �Hanapepe ^� EI e.,e IeWr 11 Koloa ♦_ i 1 in = 4 miles NORTH Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours j_ Urban Edge Boundary Reservoirs Natural AFriruIfliml Agricultural (IAL) - Small Town - Parks and Recreation Resort ���Golf Course Provisional Resort (Pending Community Plan Process) Homestead University Zone Residential Community - Plantation Camp Urban Center Industrial Neighborhood Center - Transportation Neighborhood General - Military ® I araa Tnwn N" Prnvicinnil Aaririiltwin Land Use Map - Uhu`e um uali=i- ATTACHMENT 9 ATTACHMENT 1 -Kipu Planning District Boundary Major Roads Roads Streams USGS 40 ft. Contours Urban Edge Boundary Reservoirs Natural 'W Fishpond-- -' Agricultural Agricultural (IAL) - Parks and Recreation Golf Course Homestead Residential Community - Urban Center Neighborhood Center r 1 in = 1 miles NORTH Miles 0 0.5 1 2 Neighborhood General Resort University Zone - Transportation - Military