HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022_0425_CRC OP Minutes_Approved.pdf COUNTY OF KAUAI
Minutes of Meeting
OPEN MEETING SESSION
Approved as submitted 05/23/2022.
Board/Commission: CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION Meeting Date APRIL 25, 2022
Location Boards & Commissions Conference Room, Lihue Civic Center Start of Meeting: 3:08 p.m. End of Meeting: 4:15 p.m.
Present Chair Lori Koga, Vice Chair Jan TenBruggencate. Commissioners: Bronson Bautista, Marissa Sandblom, Coty Trugillo (via Microsoft Teams).
Also: Hugo Cabrera, Deputy County Attorney. Boards & Commissions Office Staff: Administrator Ellen Ching, Administrative Specialist Anela
Segreti. Testifier: Bert Lyon.
Excused Reid Kawane
Absent
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
A. Call To Order Chair Lori Koga, called the meeting to order
at 3:08 p.m.
B. Roll Call Roll Call:
Commissioner Bautista-present
Chair Kawane - excused
Commissioner Sandblom- present
Commissioner Trugillo-present
Vice Chair TenBruggencate-present
Chair Koga- present
Quorum: 5 commissioners present
C. Approval of
Agenda
Chair Koga asked about adding another item regarding Salary Commission
request, re: facsimile/digital signatures.
Administrator Ching explained that the guidance received from Office of
County Attorney is that the facsimile signature does not need to be changed
to digital signatures cause those signatures are related to bonds, not all
contracts, so Salary Commission has considered it a moot point.
Chair Koga entertained a motion to approve the agenda.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate moved to
approve the agenda. Commissioner Bautista
seconded.
Voice Vote:
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 5:0
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 2
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
D. Minutes Open Session Minutes of March 28, 2022
Chair Koga entertained a motion to approve the minutes of March 28, 2022.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate moved to
approve the minutes of March 28, 2022.
Commissioner Sandblom seconded.
Voice Vote:
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 5:0
E. Public Testimony Testimony received today by Mr. Jonathan Jay at 2:24 p.m.
Mr. Bert Lyon present. He spoke during agenda item.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate received
testimony submitted by Mr. Jay.
Commissioner Sandblom seconded.
Voice Vote:
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 5:0
F. Communication None
G. Business CRC 2022-08 Discussion and possible action on the report of the Permitted
Interaction Group (PIG). The purpose of the Permitted Interaction Group
(PIG) is to provide a written recommendation on how and whether to create
districting for our County Council.
Chair asked if any Commissioners had any questions regarding the PIG
report.
Mr. Bert Lyon, testifier, stated that he had comments on the report. He shared
that on page 1, it would be helpful to know which years districting it was
discussed and commission voted to not put it on ballot. He added that
districting on neighboring counties, page 3, Maui Council passed a resolution
on March 21, which proposed to eliminate the Charter amendment and on
April 13, the Charter Commission passed a resolution which accepted the
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 3
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Council’s proposal, so that eliminated the Charter amendment on Maui to
have three districts, three members at large, so they remain with nine at-large
with a residency requirement. On page 11, he stated that the report notes that
the cost of the Kaua’i County Council seat is less than the cost of a State
House Representative campaign on Kaua’i or a Hawai’i County Council
campaign despite the similarity of district size. He pointed out that this would
only be applicable if there were on three County Council districts, if there
were more than each would be smaller in size, and he believes it would be
cheaper to campaign in a smaller district than a larger district. For example,
he believes it would be cheaper if there were seven districts than if there were
three. Consequently, testimony referenced on page 7, “the cost of
campaigning for a district vs. island wide would be less” would likely only
apply if there were more than three council districts. He continued that on
page 12, regarding number of Hawai’i County Council candidates, 24 in
2020, which he believes this should be the number rather than the 26 in the
report. He believes it’s much less and would only be applicable to only 3
districts, more candidates for more districts. Regarding the survey and
contracting someone, he believes that the question should be as simple as
possible like the 2016 survey.
Administrator Ching explained that at this point the Commission will decide
if they will adopt the recommendations, and which one(s).
Vice Chair TenBruggencate asked Administrator Ching to outline the PIG’s
recommendation.
Administration Ching outlined recommendations as follow:
1. The Commission should retain a consultant to formulate a plan to seek
and obtain input of a maximum of 5% or registered voters or 2362,
between 5-10% max. The input solicited should be on the larger
questions below.
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 4
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
• Their opinion on districting
• Their opinion on whether there is better representation in the
council or in the house
• What form of districting 3, 5 or 7
Based on Mr. Lyon’s testimony for simpler questions and allowing the
consultant to have more flexibility to determine size of sample. She
suggested that if they wanted to adopt recommendation 1, that they would
leave it more flexible, and allow consultant to work with Commission on
questions and sample size.
2. The Commission would retain a consultant to conduct a study on the
cost of districting in general, as well as with 3-5-7 districts. She noted
that the Office of Boards and Commissions does not have a budget to
retain these consultants and she would need to submit it based on what
the commission wants to do.
3. Upon obtaining the results on the inputs and cost the Commission
should deliberate on the larger questions of the pros and cons of
districting and equal worth of each person’s vote.
4. Upon obtaining the report the Commission should deliberate of the
larger question of the benefits of districting and if it will result on
improvements.
5. Any future proposal must include an appropriation commission.
6. Upon obtaining the reports, future considerations should start with the
2006 ballot question proposal.
7. Upon obtaining the reports, the consideration should start with three
districting first.
8. Upon obtaining the reports, the commission should start with the
concept of a seven-member Council for cost containment and
efficiency.
9. Get the consultant before making any decisions to move forward on
the ballot.
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 5
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Chair Koga asked if there are people doing surveys.
Administrator Ching, answered yes, probably on Oahu, and they would
probably not need to come here to do survey and therefore should not be a
problem, and as far as the cost containment that would probably be an
accounting firm.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate commented that the letter from Mr. Jay asserted
that it was the job of the Charter Review Commission is to confirm the issue
in question is worthy of consideration by the voters. He thinks that it
misstates what the job of the Commission is. He stated that what he reads in
the Charter is very simple, they can only put items on the ballot which they
believe are necessary and desirable. So, he does not believe that they do not
have the authority to put an item on the ballot to just allow people to express
an opinion. He went on to state that the issue that has baffled the Commission
over time is that if districting, which districting. He believes that
recommendation needs to be addressed before anything else is dealt with, and
that on an island of this size a smaller sample than 5% may reveal information
that may be in the high 90% accuracy level. He is proposing receiving with
thanks the PIG report and ask staff to research the details involved in what it
will take to obtain the budget required, how big the budget needs to be, and
bring it back to the commission so they may proceed with asking the public
to help with the concept of if they want districting, what kind of districting.
If this path is taken, there will be nothing on this ballot as budget process will
take time.
Administrator Ching addressed the budget issue and stated that should the
proposal be accepted, she would be researching the cost and submitting with
her budget which is done in December. Her current budget is in its final
stages and she would be researching and submitting it with her December
2022 budget request.
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 6
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Vice Chair TenBruggencate suggested that a mid-budgeting request to the
Council could be made to speed up the process. If not, they would be running
up to the 2024 election. He noted that the Council could say no, but they
could request it as soon as they have a number, if they would consider it.
Commissioner Sandblom stated that she wanted to be clear in response to Mr.
Jay’s letter. She went on to state that no place did they recommend no action
be taken and made nine recommendations to take action and move forward.
She explained that there were areas where they made comparisons with
Hawai’i Island County for some of the costs and ratios, and no where did they
talk about pinning district against district, the maid consideration to take is
that they had robust discussion on the many options of districting, 3, 5, 7, and
looked at pros and cons of each. Each led them to more questions and how
would it actually play out and consider the unintended consequences. She
addressed the 3-2-1 scenario and she stated that they did discuss this scenario,
there are three distinct districts and do they have to live in the district for a
period of time and what may happen if the person elected had to move
because they are renting and house is being sold and they were only able to
find something outside of the district, would there need to be a special
election. They did consider several options and looked at what it would mean
for the County. There is nine recommendations, and it was difficult for them
to agree on what was the front runner, and there is still a lot of questions.
Commissioner Bautista agreed with Commissioner Sandblom and noted that
with the testimonies more questions come up and it opens another door with
questions that they went through in the PIG trying to find answers for.
Everything had pros and cons and none of them could say one is the front
runner. Agrees that seeking more answers would be great and number one
would address that.
Mr. Lyon commented that it was wise for the PIG to want to defer and get
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 7
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
more answers to the many questions. He went on to state that in talking about
a consultant he noticed a Colin Moore that Maui had consulted with from UH
Public Policy that they may want to start in that direction. He commented on
recommendation number six, start with the 2006 ballot question proposal
which was three district and four at-large, he felt that at least if they look at
2016 survey, that he believes that any other survey will have similar results
to, that proposal was the least popular, only receiving 8% of the vote in 2016,
which he did not feel meant it was the most popular. He pointed out the in
the 2016 survey that the five district, two at-large was the most popular, and
seven district, zero at large was only 1% difference. He also reminded the
Commission that the PIG from 2013 recommended the five district, two at
large proposal. He feels one of these would be better to start with than the
three district, four at large. He went on to comment on residency, with
Hawai`i Island and Oahu may be to look at, 90 days is what he’s read, and if
move, continue to work through term and then next election would need to
run for new district.
Administrator Ching suggested that they take each recommendation
separately for adoption.
Commissioner Sandblom recommended all nine, but if there are any that do
not seem to fit to let the PIG know.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate suggested that the Commission accept the PIG
report with its recommendations and use the recommendations as the guide
for future actions. What they are doing if they proceed down this path is
passing to the County Council, and they will need to decide if they will be
providing the funds. He feels that the process should be started and will be
occupying their time for the next year in a half. Staff will need to start looking
at companies, costs and developing a budget and getting it to the County
Council. In discussions once someone is picked than go back to report and
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 8
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
limit to a Council scenario with seven Councilmembers as one of the
recommendations was and consider the various alternatives. He suggested
receiving the report and let the document continue to guide them.
Commissioner Bautista moved to receive
the PIG report and adopt the
recommendations in regard to how they
move forward in districting. Commissioner
Sandblom seconded.
Roll Call Vote:
Commissioner Bautista-aye
Chair Kawane - excused
Commissioner Sandblom- aye
Commissioner Trugillo-aye
Vice Chair TenBruggencate-aye
Chair Koga- aye
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 5:0
CRC 2020-17 Discussion and possible action on proposing a Charter
amendment relating to Council Districting.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate moved to defer
CRC 2020-17 and continue to have it
appear on the agenda. Commissioner
Bautista seconded.
Voice Vote:
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 5:0
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 9
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
CRC 2022-09 Discussion and possible action on a proposal to amend Article
XXIX of the Charter allowing the Salary Commission authority to establish
the maximum salaries of all elected and appointed officials.
Administrator Ching went over the proposed ballot question is simpler than
previously put on the ballot. Purpose and background information has been
added.
Commissioners reviewed submitted proposed ballot question, purpose, and
background.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate commented on the proposed purpose presented.
He would reword it to say that the purpose is to efficiently establish salaries
that attract and retain the best and the brightest. He will assist Administrator
Ching on this with the Commissions permission.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate moved to
resubmit the proposal to staff for clarity and
bring back to Commission at the next
meeting to review. Commissioner Bautista
seconded.
Voice Vote:
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 5:0
CRC 2022-05 Discussion and possible action on proposed ballot question,
purpose, and background on Charter amendment to remove Article XXX
relating to the Electric Power Authority.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate recused himself at 4:09pm
Administrator Ching discussed the second draft of the questions, purpose,
and background with the Commission. She noted that instead of using
roman numerals she used numbers for clarity.
Commission found draft to be acceptable.
Vice Chair TenBruggencate recused himself
from this item, he is a member of the KIUC
board.
Commissioner Sandblom moved to approve
as presented the ballot question, purpose,
and background for proposed Charter
amendment removing Article XXX.
Commissioner Bautista seconded.
Voice Vote:
4 Ayes, 0 Nays
Motion carried 4:0:1 recused
Charter Review Commission
Open Session
April 25, 2022 Page 10
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
H. Announcements Next Meeting: May 23, 2022
Vice Chair returned to meeting at 4:15pm
I. Adjournment Hearing no objections Chair Koga
adjourned the meeting at 4:15 p.m.
Submitted by: __________________________________ Reviewed and Approved by: _________________________________________
Anela Segreti, Administrative Specialist Lori Koga, Chair
(X) Approved as circulated.
( ) Approved with amendments. See minutes of