HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022_0201_CSC_Minutes_Open_ApprvTest.pdf
COUNTY OF KAUAI
Minutes of Meeting
OPEN SESSION
Board/Commission: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Meeting Date: February 1, 2022
Location Microsoft Teams Teleconference Start of Meeting: 2:06 p.m. End of Meeting: 5:18 p.m.
Present Chair Jeffrey Iida. Vice Chair Beverly Gotelli. Commissioners: V. Pamai Cano, Fely Faulkner, and Francis Kaawa.
Deputy County Attorney Mark Ishmael (left at 2:14pm). Director Human Resources Annette Anderson (left at 5:05pm). Office of
Boards and Commissions Staff: Administrator Ellen Ching (left at 2:14pm) and Commission Support Clerk Sandra Muragin.
Excused Commissioner Vonnell Ramos.
Absent
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Commissioner Faulkner entered the meeting at 2:06 p.m. after resolving computer issues.
Call To Order/
Roll Call
Chair Iida called the Open Session meeting to order at 2:06 p.m. and requested a roll call.
Commission Support Clerk Sandra Muragin verified attendance and requested a verbal
response of present or here and to identify if anyone was present with them at their location
during the meeting;
Commissioner Cano replied present and alone.
Commissioner Faulkner present and alone.
Commissioner Kaawa replied here and alone.
Commissioner Ramos replied present and alone.
Vice Chair Gotelli replied present and alone.
Chair Iida replied present and alone.
Deputy County Attorney Ishmael replied present and alone.
Human Resources Director Anderson replied present and identified Deputy County Attorney
Hugo Cabrera in the same room.
Administrator Ching replied present and alone.
Support Clerk Muragin replied present and alone.
Quorum was established with
five commissioners present.
Approval of
Agenda
Vice Chair Gotelli moved to
approve the agenda, as
presented. Ms. Cano seconded
the motion. Motion carried 5:0.
Public Ms. Muragin reported receipt of two written testimonies.
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
February 1, 2022 Page 2
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
Comments and
Testimony
Councilmember Felicia Cowden testified that as the committee member for public safety she
asked the commission to not approve, but defer the January 4, 2022, open session meeting
minutes. She said the concerns of the people were overlooked and it would be wise and
judicious to include the testimonies. She said the group was suing Governor David Ige and it
would go to the Hawai‘i Supreme Court with the intention of it moving up to the U.S. Supreme
Court. She asked that they defer approval of the January 4, 2022, open session meeting
minutes.
Chair Iida asked if anyone else wanted to testify. Hearing none he moved on to the next agenda
item.
Executive
Session
Chair Iida asked for a motion to enter appeal hearing executive session.
Ms. Ching read the Appeal Hearing and Hawaii Revised Statutes to move the meeting into
Executive Session.
Pursuant to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §76-14 the Merit Appeals Board shall decide appeals
from any action under Chapter 76. Pursuant to §76-47, a jurisdiction may continue to use
its Civil Service Commission or Appeals Board, with or without modification, as its Merit
Appeals Board to assume all of the functions and responsibilities under section §76-14.
Pursuant to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §92-6(a)(2)(D), when the Civil Service Commission
is exercising its adjudicatory functions, the appeal hearing may be closed to the public.
Pursuant to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §92-7(a), the Commission may, when deemed
necessary, hold an Executive Session on any agenda item without written public notice if
the Executive Session on any agenda item without written public notice if the Executive
Session was not anticipated in advance. Any such Executive Session shall be held pursuant
to HRS §92-4 and shall be limited to those items described in HRS §92-5(a). Discussion
held in Executive Session are closed to the public.
Ms. Faulkner moved to enter
Appeal Hearing Executive
Session. Vice Chair Gotelli
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
February 1, 2022 Page 3
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5:0.
The commission and staff,
disconnected from open session
at 2:14 p.m. and connected into
appeal hearing executive
session.
Call To Order in
Open Session/
Roll Call
Chair Iida called the Open Session meeting back to order at 5:09 p.m. and requested a roll call.
Commission Support Clerk Sandra Muragin verified attendance and requested a verbal
response of present or here and for the record to announce and identify if anyone was present
with them at their location during the meeting;
Commissioner Cano replied present and alone.
Commissioner Faulkner replied present and alone.
Commissioner Kaawa replied present and alone.
Vice Chair Gotelli replied present and alone.
Chair Iida replied present and alone.
Commission Support Clerk Muragin replied present and alone.
Quorum was established with
five commissioners present.
Ratify Actions Ratify actions taken in executive session for ES-03, ES-04 and ES-05. Ms. Faulkner moved to ratify
actions taken in executive
session for ES-03. Ms. Cano
seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5:0.
Approval of
Meeting Minutes
a) Open Session Minutes of January 4, 2022.
Vice Chair Gotelli moved to
defer approval of the Open
Session Minutes of January 4,
2022. Mr. Kaawa seconded the
motion. Motion carried 5:0.
Announcements Next Meeting: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 – 3:00 p.m., Microsoft Teams Teleconference
Civil Service Commission
Open Session
February 1, 2022 Page 4
SUBJECT DISCUSSION ACTION
The commission discussed available dates to continue the appeal hearing meeting and decided a
first choice of Wednesday, February 23 and second choice of Tuesday, February 22. Ms.
Muragin stated she would confirm the dates with the two parties and notify the commissioners
by email.
Adjournment Chair Iida asked for a motion to adjourn.
Ms. Faulkner moved to adjourn
the meeting. Vice Chair Gotelli
seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5:0.
Chair Iida adjourned the
meeting at 5:18 p.m.
Submitted by: ________________________________________ Reviewed and Approved by: _________________________________________
Sandra Muragin, Commission Support Clerk Jeffrey Iida, Chair
( X ) Approved as circulated. 03/01/22
( ) Approved with amendments. See minutes of________meeting.
From:Christopher Lyden
To:Mayor; Council Members; Sandra Muragin
Subject:Public Comments on Civil Service Comm. meeting , 1-4-22
Date:Wednesday, January 26, 2022 2:08:54 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the County of Kauai. Do not click links or
open attachments even if the sender is known to you unless it is something you were
expecting.
Dear Mayor Kawakami and County Council Members,
In regards to the Civil Service Commission hearing of January
4th, 2022, I was one of the Kauai residents who took the time
to address the Commission in Public testimony against the
proposed policy change that would demand all applicants
wishing to be employed by the County of Kauai would be
required to be vaccinated to be considered for any position.
I saw the proposed minutes of the January 4th meeting in the
agenda packet awaiting approval and was shocked to find that
my and others' verbal testimony, as well as all those who
submitted written testimony, had been excluded from the
minutes. The lack of any record of opposition testimony would
appear to mean the Civil Service Commission did not keep any
record of the public's comments in opposition to their
proposal. If neither the written comments, not the verbal
testimony was recorded, transcribed, or retained for review, I
would not believe this was not a mere oversight. Omitting any
record of public opposition would appear to invalidate any
public involvement in the governmental process. Ignoring
public input invalidates the process of responsive government.
Where are the written comments of opposition? Where are the
transcripts or recordings of the verbal testimony? Why are they
not in the minutes of the meeting (as required)? Why are We,
the People of Kauai being intentionally ignored? To eliminate
any record of opposition is to arrogantly thumb your nose at
the public who wants to be involved in the process of local
governance.
Since you, as Mayor and Council Members, did not get to see
or hear the multiple people who publicly testified in opposition
to the Commission's proposal, I am including a transcript
below, of what I prepared and presented to the Commission,
which has chosen to exclude from the official record.
Should not the agencies of government be open to the opinions
of the public, who they are supposed to be serving? My
comments should be reviewed, as my clinical opinions are
pertinent, and the legal ramifications of the proposal going
forward could be financially devastating to our local
government.
My Public Testimony from Jan. 4, 2022:
"I am Dr. Christopher Lyden, a longtime resident of Kauai. I am a retired Chiropractic
Physician with post-doctoral education in Neurology. I am not a virologist, or
epidemiologist, but since I treated many patients who had been neurologically injured
by vaccines, I studied the benefits and risks of injuries associated with vaccines for
over 30 years. The currently used Covid vaccines are not conventional vaccines, and
are instead referred to as “gene-therapy medicinal products” by their pharmaceutical
manufacturers. They are associated with hundreds of thousands of 'Adverse Events'
(deleterious side effects) and over 20,000 deaths, according to the CDC's VAERS
vaccine recording system.
I would like give public testimony on Counsel member Cowden’s letter: CSC 2022-02,
because I agree with the points she has made. The suggested changes to consider
only ‘vaccinated applicants’ for County employment will create an unfair bias in hiring
practices. Such a policy would be both medically unjustified and unlawful, based upon
Federal Regulations and the Hawaii Revised Statutes.
One of the world experts on vaccines is Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA
technology utilized in the SARS CoV-2 vaccines. According to Dr. Malone, “the viral
genes injected into your cells make toxic Spike Proteins [that] cause permanent
damage in critical organs, including:
The brain and nervous system
The heart and blood vessels
The reproductive system
And this vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to the immune system
This novel technology has not been adequately tested. Once these damages have
occurred they are irreversible and irreparable.” (Dr. Robert Malone)
The American Heart Assoc. journal Circulation (Abstr. 10712) states: Cardiac Risk
increases by 225% after getting the Covid vaccine.
Fully vaccinated adults under 60 are now dying at double the rate of
unvaccinated adults of same age.
There are also legal ramifications of your proposed policy changes:
The NIH has stated (Aug. 18, 2020): “[You] have every Right to refuse a vaccine…If
someone refuses a vaccine…then there’s nothing you can do about that. You cannot
force someone to take a vaccine.”
The US Supreme Court has recognized that a “forcible injection … into a non-
consenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's
liberty.” Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229.
21 C.F.R. Section 50.24 et seq. “…it is unlawful to conduct medical research (even
in the case of emergency) without…informed consent free of coercion.” The act of
injecting an experimental drug into an individual without their informed consent is a
violation of their Human Rights, and the Nuremberg Codes, based on medical
coercion.
Under US Code 2331, subsection 802, any time a US citizen is forced to do
something they might not otherwise wish to do, it is “coercion.” It is a felony,
punishable by a 99 prison term, to coerce anyone in a population to accept a drug or
medical procedure that they do not want to participate in. An ‘Experimental’ vaccine
falls within this classification. Withholding something of value, including employment,
based upon someone needing to comply with a demand is to unlawfully coerce them.
This proposed policy would also violate:
Hawaii Revised Statutes 489-3: Free and Equal Access to Public Accommodations
Hawaii Constitution, Article 1, Section 4: Free exercise of religious expression without
discrimination. Eg. If someone refuses a vaccination because it contains extracts of aborted
human fetal cells (and they all do), their religious freedom has been denied them. Violation of
the above is a felony.
Hawaii Professions & Occupations Code 453-2: Practicing medicine without a license. To
encourage, demand, or require a person to take any medicinal product is to practice medicine,
and requires a medical license to do so.
You have no authority to recommend, much less demand, that applicants participate in a
drug trial. Particularly one in which there are recognized serious health risks, including
permanent disability, and death.
Discriminating against someone based on their medical condition, their medical history,
disability, or personal religious views (which includes refusal to be injected with
inoculations that contain aborted fetal tissue), is a clear violation of their Civli Rights.
Let this serve as a Notice of Liability to each public official on this call:
As a subsection of the County Government, the Civil Service Commission would be wise
to realize that once you have been informed of these facts, you could possibly open
yourselves to legal remedies in both your personal as well as professional capacity.
Aggrieved persons who are denied employment based on discrimination for refusal to
participate in an ongoing experimental drug trial, may be able to recover up to three
times the actual damages from lost wages, including but not limited to injunctive relief,
punitive damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees. Violating the Code of Federal
Regulations and the US Codes mentioned above, would be committing felonies
punishable with extended jail time and sizable fines."
Thank you for reviewing the above.
Dr. Christopher Lyden
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
COUNTY COUNCIL OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
Arryl Kaneshiro, Chair
Mason K. Chock, Vice Chair Jade K. Fountain-Tanigawa, County Clerk
Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr. Scott K. Sato, Deputy County Clerk
Felicia Cowden
Bill DeCosta
Luke A. Evslin Telephone: (808) 241-4188
KipuKai Kuali‘i Facsimile: (808) 241-6349
E-mail: cokcouncil@kauai.gov
Council Services Division
4396 Rice Street, Suite 209
Līhu‘e, Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i 96766
January 28, 2022
TESTIMONY OF FELICIA COWDEN
COUNCILMEMBER, KAUA‘I COUNTY COUNCIL
ON
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
a) Open Session Minutes of January 4, 2022
Civil Service Commission of the County of Kaua‘i
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
2:00 p.m.
Meeting Available Via Microsoft Teams
Dear Chair Iida and Members of the Civil Service Commission:
As an individual member of the Kaua‘i County Council, I oppose the
Commission approving the above-referenced meeting minutes and request that you
defer this agenda item so the minutes can be amended for inclusion of crucial missing
details. Although I understand that the Commission has other matters to address
during its February 1, 2022 meeting, the accuracy and approval of minutes are
important functions for open government.
During the Commission’s January 4, 2022 Open Session, agenda item
CSC 2022-02 was discussed. Numerous participants provided public testimony.
However, the proposed minutes are incomplete because there is no mention of the
names of the testifiers, the nature of their testimony, or whether the testimonies were
in support of or opposition to the agenda item. (Additionally, attaching written
testimony to the minutes, while not required, is more user-friendly for the public, and
furthermore more streamlined for Commission staff, than requiring interested
persons to separately request those records pursuant to the Uniform Information
Practices Act, Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 92F.)
Regarding what must be included in minutes of a “board,” such as the Civil
Service Commission, HRS Section 92-9(a) states in pertinent part:
“(a) The board shall keep written or recorded minutes of all meetings.
Unless otherwise required by law, neither a full transcript nor a recording of
the meeting is required, but the minutes shall give a true reflection of the
matters discussed at the meeting and the views of the participants. Written
minutes shall include, but need not be limited to:
Jeffrey Iida, Chair and Members of the Civil Service Commission
Re: Testimony Relating To Approval Of Meeting Minutes, a) Open Session Minutes
of January 4, 2022
January 28, 2022
Page 2
(1) The date, time and place of the meeting;
(2) The members of the board recorded as either present or absent;
(3) The substance of all matters proposed, discussed, or decided; and
a record, by individual member, of any votes taken; and
(4) Any other information that any member of the board requests be
included or reflected in the minutes.”
(Emphasis added.) The Office of Information Practices (OIP) explained of HRS
Section 92-9 that “the statute requires the minutes to reflect the views of non-board
members who participated in the meetings . . . .” (See OIP Opinion Letter No. 03-13).
Although attaching written testimony to the minutes is not a requirement, “OIP
concludes that, in order for minutes to give a ‘true reflection of the matters discussed
at the meeting and the views of the participants,’ the minutes must generally describe
only the oral testimony or presentations at the meeting . . . .” (See OIP Opinion Letter
No. F14-02). Accordingly, the draft minutes of the January 4, 2022 meeting that
pertain to CSC 2022-02 are inadequate because they do not reflect the substance of
what was discussed, utterly lacking any reflection of the views of the testifier
participants. It is particularly important to avoid defects in minutes and public
records at this time when medical status discrimination (such as the County’s
employment policy that was at issue) is being scrutinized by relevant court cases at
the State and Federal levels.
Additionally, it would be helpful for Members of the Commission to request
additional pertinent information be reflected in the minutes as authorized by HRS
Section 92-9(a)(4). It was stated during the January 4, 2022 meeting that the issues
raised by CSC 2022-02 are not the purview of the Civil Service Commission, but this
is not correct. Pursuant to the Charter of the County of Kaua‘i, Section 15.03.C., one
of the Commission’s powers and duties is to: “Advise the mayor and director of human
resources on problems concerning personnel and classification administration.” One
way of becoming equipped to offer that advice is to consider citizen perspectives on
personnel matters. Therefore, the concerns of the impacted citizens who testified
during CSC 2022-02 should not be dismissed as irrelevant to the Commission. There
were at least two (2) testifiers whose families have been directly impacted by these
policies and were in fact the inspiration for my November 30, 2021 memorandum to
the County Administration (which was not addressed solely to the Commission but
also included the Mayor, Managing Director, County Attorney, and Director of
Human Resources—again, in keeping with the various Charter responsibilities of
each recipient). Lawsuits are currently underway in Hawai‘i and elsewhere that are
likely to refute these types of hiring discrimination policies.
Jeffrey Iida, Chair and Members of the Civil Service Commission
Re: Testimony Relating To Approval Of Meeting Minutes, a) Open Session Minutes
of January 4, 2022
January 28, 2022
Page 3
Based on the above, I believe it is the Commission’s obligation under HRS
Section 92-9 to defer this matter until the January 4, 2022 minutes relating to agenda
item CSC 2022-02 are amended to be legally sufficient.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Should you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at (808) 241-4188.
Sincerely,
FELICIA COWDEN
Councilmember, Kaua‘i County Council
JA:dmc