HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/22/2024 Public hearing minutes on C 2024-96 PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 22, 2024
A public hearing of the Council of the County of Kaua`i was called to order by
Mel Rapozo, Chair, Committee of the Whole, on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, at
8:48 a.m., at the Council Chambers, 4396 Rice Street, Suite 201, Historic County
Building, Lihu`e, and the presence of the following was noted:
Honorable Addison Bulosan
Honorable Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr.
Honorable Felicia Cowden
Honorable Bill DeCosta
Honorable Ross Kagawa
Honorable KipuKai Kuali`i
Honorable Mel Rapozo
The Clerk read the notice of the public hearing on the following:
"C 2024-96-Communication (05/08/2024) from the Mayor, submitting his
Supplemental Budget Communication for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and Proposed
Amendments to the Budget Bills, pursuant to Section 19.02A of the Kauai
County Charter,"
which was ordered to print by the Council of the County of Kaua`i on May 8, 2024,
and published in The Garden Island newspaper on May 11, 2024.
Council Chair Rapozo: Are there any written testimonies?
JADE K. FOUNTAIN-TANIGAWA, County Clerk: No written testimony.
Council Chair Rapozo: Is there anyone on Zoom wishing to testify?
(Note: No one from the public testified on the Bill via written testimony or oral
testimony taken at the beginning of the meeting via the Zoom remote
technology platform.)
Council Chair Rapozo: Are there any registered speakers in the
audience wishing to testify? With that, Mr. Sykos.
The hearing proceeded as follows:
LONNIE SYKOS: For the record, Lonnie Sykos. When I read
through the budget online, I was extremely disappointed to see that the County
Council has no intention of trying to hire an auditor. According to the paperwork
given to the public, there is no search going on for an auditor. Other than the dollar
or whatever that is in the budget, there appears to be no intention of hiring an
auditor. The Supreme Court ruled in a previous ruling that when a Charter says
"shall," it means "may." I believe Chair Rapozo was on the Council at the time that
PUBLIC HEARING 2 MAY 22, 2024
C 2024-96
this occurred. The County was sued by its own County Attorney. Now, we sit here
in the reality that every time the Charter says, "shall," it means "may" because the
County Council has failed to try and protect your powers and authorities versus that
of the Office of the Mayor and so, two (2) things are impacted. Number one, the
Charter states that the Mayor has to present a budget by a certain date, but our
former Mayor sued us and according to the State Supreme Court, the Mayor only
needs to submit a budget one (1) day before the end of the budget period, and he does
not have to give you or the public any time for input into this. This was a big deal at
the time, and yet, the Council...another"can that you kick down the road." The public
never knows when, "shall" means "may," and the Charter says that there "shall" be
an auditor. If you want to use your prerogative to say that "shall" means, "may" and
so we may not hire an auditor because we do not want to, that is an affront to the
civil rights of the public that the auditor that we shall have, you may decide not to
pursue. I have an objection to your budget that you are not trying. You do not have
the money in there to be pursuing an auditor. That is my "two cents." Thank you.
Council Chair Rapozo: Is there anyone else in the audience wishing
to testify?
ALICE PARKER: Alice Parker, for the record. I vehemently
support what he said because auditors find lots of things and keep things honest. We
really need an auditor.
Council Chair Rapozo: Is Tessie Kinnaman here? This is the public
hearing for the supplemental budget.
TESSIE KINNAMAN: Tessie Kinnaman, for the record. I want to
take a second to also congratulate the company (note: Jack Harter Helicopters pilot
Eli Hobbs received a Council certificate earlier in the day). I knew the Harters when
I was a teenager because I used to babysit for them, and I applaud the company
because I think their safety record is impeccable. I came here to testify against the
budget for several items, but the main one would be...I have a list of concerns on the
first page, the Kukui`ula Ordinance, Condition 7 and Condition 15. That
includes 15(a) and especially, 15(d) which is related to the public park at Kukui`ula
Harbor. That park has been completed for a while now and people have been...
Council Chair Rapozo: Tessie, the public hearing is on the budget. I
am not sure which part of the budget...hold her time please. You are speaking on the
Ordinance for Kukui`ula.
Ms. Kinnaman: No, but this is regarding the budget also.
Council Chair Rapozo: Help me. Where does it connect to the
budget? I do not mean to be rude.
Ms. Kinnaman: I guess to provide moneys for the conditions
and also the "Hoban" property."
Council Chair Rapozo: Okay, got it. Alright. Thank you.
PUBLIC HEARING 3 MAY 22, 2024
C 2024-96
Ms. Kinnaman: Anyway. The first and second page has the
Hoban one and you will see that I submitted a picture that I took on
July 20, 2021. I think that this is when the Hoban property was being resold and you
can see the survey pin there. The survey pin ends just before the telephone pole.
That portion from the survey pin to the right, to the other column, is the public access
and as you can see, it has been blocked. It has been blocked for ages. Also, the electric
meter is on that wall that is blocking, also, the telephone pole. The description of the
footpath easement is on the second page and it shows the location. The easement
also...both that and Exhibit "A" page shows the measurements of the easement. The
easement belongs to the County because it is a drainage easement and it was turned
over to the County from the Bruns, way back when Joseph and Martina Brun owned
the property. It is on record at the Bureau of Conveyances. There is a new landowner
now and they are called Kaikapu, LLC and they have been marketing this property.
They are a Transient Vacation Rental (TVR) and an Airbnb and they are marketing
it as a vacation rental with your own private beach. As far as I know, there are no
private beaches in the County or in the State, for that matter. I am trying to bring
this back up again because I think it is about time that we pursue this, no matter
how hard it is for the County Attorney or whoever here in the government. This is
going to be lost forever and we need this access from ages ago.
Council Chair Rapozo: Clarifying question. Go ahead,
Councilmember Kagawa.
Councilmember Kagawa: Tessie, I have a question. I know that we
worked on this issue for many years with Mayor Carvalho back then. I remember
money was in there and we tried to negotiate with the owner and the owner refused.
I guess it was, "what was the next step?" Is that your understanding? From that
point, is your understanding that the money that we had in there disappeared? That
was with the Open Space.
Ms. Kinnaman: Open Space.
Council Chair Rapozo: I will stop that because the public hearing is
specifically to receive...Let me just say Councilmember Kagawa, and to the members,
that we will follow up on this with the Planning Department.
Ms. Kinnaman: I have one last thing to say. The County owns
that easement so I do not see why we should be paying the landowner for anything.
I submitted information and you can go get more information if you want...also four
thousand (4,000) signatures for this public access. It is not like we were sitting on
our °okole for forever. This has been an issue since 1980.
Council Chair Rapozo: Only clarifying questions on her testimony
and not to expand.
Ms. Kinnaman: ...the little that I have given to you
again...the signatures and the information is on file. It should be on file here from...I
am not sure from how many years ago.
PUBLIC HEARING 4 MAY 22, 2024
C 2024-96
Council Chair Rapozo: We will follow up on that.
Councilmember DeCosta: Tessie, I have one clarifying question for you.
When you and I sat on the Open Space Commission together in 2003...
Council Chair Rapozo: That is not a clarifying question. That is a
new question. A clarifying question is if she says something that you do not
understand, then you can ask for clarification. Okay, thank you.
Councilmember Kagawa: I guess that was my question. She was
coming to us, saying to please put money in there. I am saying...did we not have
money in there? Did the County not try to acquire this parcel but there was a reason
why it was...
Council Chair Rapozo: Again, Sunshine Law prohibits us from
discussing this. This is a public hearing. We will follow up, have this item with the
Planning Department, and possibly have a committee meeting on this item.
Councilmember Kagawa: I understand.
Council Chair Rapozo: Thank you. I will say that we are not typically
allowed, but when erroneous statements are made, I will make clarification.
Mr. Sykos alleged that there was a Supreme Court ruling regarding "shall" versus
"may" and that is just not true. The "shall" versus "may" case had nothing to do with
the budget. The "shall" versus "may" case was myself and Councilmember Kuali`i
suing the County...not really suing, but we made a motion for declaratory judgment
on the definition. That case was never heard because the judge ruled that we did not
have any standing. There was no Supreme Case ruling, none of that. I just wanted
to make that clarification for the public watching.
Councilmember Kuali`i: It was regarding the salary resolution.
Council Chair Rapozo: It had nothing to do with the budget. Is there
anyone else in the audience wishing to testify? Seeing none, this budget hearing is
closed.
There being no further testimony on this matter, the public hearing adjourned
at 9:01 a.m.
ctfully submitted,
JADE . FOUNTAIN-TANIGAWA
County Clerk
:slr